DOCSLIB.ORG

Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Reader’s guide To the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested report As with all regional and district plan reviews and plan changes, the Resource Management Act (RMA) requires the council to prepare a report summarising all the decisions requested. The report for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) will be the largest of its kind since the RMA came into effect in 1991, containing more than 93,600 individual requests from more than 9,400 submissions. The information below outlines how the submissions were summarised and provides guidance on how to navigate the Summary of Decisions Requested (SDR) report which is available online at www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/unitaryplan and in hard copy at selected Auckland Council Libraries, service centres and local board offices. 1. Content of the summary of decisions requested report The report is made up of concise summaries of the decisions requested in submissions. The report is not intended to be a summary of the submissions in their entirety and does not include reasons for the request or other supporting material included in the submissions. The original submission should be referred to if you are seeking to make a further submission, or to fully understand the issues raised by a submitter. A number of submissions discuss provisions of the PAUP or other information without providing specific references. No attempt has been made to source these references, or obtain clarification. Any clarification needed should be sourced directly from the submitter. In some cases, the decisions requested by submitters were unclear. Any inferences made are identified by the use of square brackets. For example ‘Reduce parking thresholds [for organised sport and recreation].’ Where a submission requests amendments to the text, this has generally been identified with strikethrough for deleted text and underlining for inserted text. However, if amendments are not apparent, then the complete text as it appears in the submission has been included 1 | Page and should be compared with the text in the PAUP. Some submissions quote substantial sections of the PAUP. The summary either summarises the text and references the reader to the relevant page in the submission, or includes the amended text and omits text that is unchanged by the submission. Ellipses […] have been used to indicate omitted text. Page numbers have been added to all submissions. Large submissions and submissions that were received in parts have been broken down into volumes. The summary refers to the volume (where relevant) and the page number allocated by the council. For example ‘Refer to submission, Volume 5, page 10/90’. You can find a glossary and list of abbreviations used frequently in the summaries at the end of this document. Many submissions included a request for ‘any such consequential amendments’ or similar. Such requests have not been included in the summary. The Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel will be able to consider consequential amendments during the course of the hearings on the PAUP. Some petitions were received. These have been attributed to the person who submitted the petition and the number of people that signed the petition has been recorded. For example ‘J. Citizen and 97 others’. 2. Reading the summary of decisions requested report Each submission has been given a unique number and every decision requested has been assigned a submission point number. The submission point number is annotated on the original submission to guide the reader to the relevant part of the submission. The submission point is identified by a line on the right hand side of the text and the relevant number. As far as possible, the submission point numbers are sequential. However, in some cases, the numbering is not sequential as a result of points being added or deleted as part of the quality assurance process. When reading a summary, you need to refer to the theme, topic and subtopic (if applicable). These indicate the part of the PAUP and provision number (where relevant) that the summary relates to. In the example below, the theme, topic and subtopic identify that the decision requested relates to the Subdivision provisions in the Auckland-wide section, Chapter H5.3 – 4 Assessment. 2 | Page Sub#/ Name Address for Theme Topic Subtopic Summary Point service 1234-56 J. Citizen [email protected] Subdivision Auckland-wide - H5.3 – 4 Add the following controlled general Assessment activity assessment criteria to Table 12: ‘Proposed sites should be able to accommodate development intended by the underlying zone.’ 3. Rezoning, precincts and changes to the Rural Urban Boundary Submissions on precincts, rezoning and changes to the Rural Urban Boundary are organised by area. The maps at the end of this guide show the different areas for submissions relating to rezoning and changes to the Rural Urban Boundary. Submissions relating to precincts are organised by the same areas as for rezoning. 3 | Page Glossary BFA Bonus floor area CMA Coastal Marine Area FAR Floor area ratio GFA Gross floor area GMO Genetically modified organism GSA Gross site area MHWS Mean high water springs NES National Environmental Standards NSA Net site area NPS National Policy Statement NZCPS New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement NZHPT New Zealand Historic Places Trust NZTA New Zealand Transport Agency ONC Outstanding natural character ONF Outstanding natural feature ONL Outstanding natural landscape PAUP Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan RMA Resource Management Act 1991 RPS Regional Policy Statement RUB Rural Urban Boundary SEA Significant Ecological Area Abbreviations C Celsius dB Decibel ha Hectare Km Kilometre(s) l Litre(s) m Metre(s) m3 Metre(s) cubed % Percentage m2 Square metre(s) km2 Square kilometre(s) 4 | Page Mangawhai Te Arai Little Barrier Island Tomarata Pakiri Port Albert Waiteitei Whangaripo Wellsford Leigh Hoteo Wharehine North Wayby Point Wells Omaha Tapora Matakana Waiwhiu Tauhoa Hoteo Sandspit Kaipara Warkworth Flats Mangakura Kawau Algies Bay Island Woodcocks Glorit Pohuehue South Head Mahurangi Komokoriki Mahurangi Araparera Puhoi West Woodhill Tahekeroa Forest Waioneke Makarau Waiwera Shelly Beach Kanohi Orewa Wainui Army Bay Kaukapakapa Silverdale Woodhill Pine Forest Whangaparaoa Waitoki Valley Parkhurst Loch Norrie Parakai Dairy Flat Helensville Okura Long Bay Fairview Heights Rakino Albany Island Schnapper Rock Waimauku Motutapu Kumeu Milford Greenhithe Island Palm Rangitoto Beach Beach Haven Takapuna Island Oneroa Waiheke Island Birkenhead Belmont Taupaki West Harbour Omiha Muriwai Stanley Cowes Point Massey Waitakere CBD Mission Orapiu Bay Lincoln Glendowie Ponui Island (Chamberlins Henderson Te Henga Mount Saint Johns Island) Maraetai (Bethells Glendene Eden Beach) Howick Panmure Anawhata Oratia Pakuranga Onehunga Waiatarua Titirangi Westfield Waitakere Ranges Whitford Piha Favona East Tamaki Kawakawa Parau Bay Orere Mangere Point Karekare Flat Bush Ihumatao Manukau Huia Clevedon Ness Little Cornwallis Wiri Valley Huia Manurewa East Whatipu Ardmore Wattle Takanini Bay Grahams Weymouth Beach Papakura Hunua Awhitu Elletts Beach Opaheke Hunua Ranges Seagrove Moumoukai Karaka Runciman Ponga Kaiaua Clarks Kingseat Pollok Beach Waiau Pa Ararimu Ramarama Paparimu Te Toro Happy Valley Paerata Paparata Patumahoe Kohekohe Bombay Pukekohe Mauku Waipipi Mission Bush Buckland Waiuku Karioitahi This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking NORTH (includes Waiheke) any action.Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Changes to the Rural Urban Boundary WEST Height datum: Auckland 1946. Ref Number: U:\CityWide\Geospatial\Plans - Unitary Plan\3_Workspaces\SUBMISSIONS\Changes to RUB.mxd SOUTH Published Name: Mangawhai Te Arai Little Barrier Island Tomarata Pakiri Port Albert Whangaripo Wellsford Leigh Hoteo Ti Point Wharehine North Wayby Omaha Tapora Omaha Flats Tauhoa Dome Valley Hoteo Tawharanui Sandspit Kaipara Warkworth Flats Mangakura Kawau Algies Bay Island Woodcocks Glorit Pohuehue South Head Mahurangi Komokoriki Mahurangi Araparera Puhoi West Woodhill Tahekeroa Forest Waioneke Makarau Waiwera Shelly Beach Kanohi Orewa Wainui Army Bay Kaukapakapa Silverdale Woodhill Pine Forest Whangaparaoa Waitoki Valley Parkhurst Loch Norrie Parakai Dairy Riverhead Helensville Flat Okura Forest Long Bay Fairview Heights Rakino Albany Island Woodhill Schnapper Rock Waimauku Motutapu Kumeu Milford Island Rangitoto Beach Takapuna Oneroa Haven Island Waiheke Island Birkenhead Belmont Taupaki West Harbour Muriwai Stanley Cowes Point Massey Waitakere CBD Orapiu Lincoln Glendowie Ponui Henderson Island (Chamberlins Te Henga Mount Saint Johns Island) (Bethells Glendene Eden Maraetai Beach) Owairaka Howick Panmure Anawhata Oratia Pakuranga Onehunga Waiatarua Titirangi Westfield Waitakere Ranges Whitford Piha Favona East Tamaki Kawakawa Bay Orere Mangere Point Karekare Ihumatao Manukau Huia Clevedon Ness Wiri Valley Cornwallis Matingarahi Manurewa East Whatipu Ardmore Orua Takanini Bay Grahams Beach Weymouth Papakura Hunua Awhitu Elletts Beach Opaheke Hunua Ranges Karaka Moumoukai Runciman Ponga Kaiaua Clarks Kingseat Pollok Beach Waiau Pa Ararimu Ramarama Paparimu Glenbrook Beach
Recommended publications
  • Meet Your Franklin Local Board Candidates P4-5

    Meet Your Franklin Local Board Candidates P4-5

    6 September 2019 Issue 1317 Stephanie McLean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast Stephanie Mclean Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Election Sales &Marketing Specialist M 021 164 5111 Hoverd&Co. SPeCIAL special AGENTs IAN 0272859314 JENNY02040002564 Meet your NICOLETTE0277029157 Franklin Local Board candidates TING 40 p4-5 RA Y B T E E OR ON A R L MTIMBER E CO.LTD S C 292 8656 • • 19 9 79 – 201 Morton Timber Co. Ltd 226 NorthRoad, Clevedon2248 Ph 292 8656 or 021943 220 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mortontimber.co.nz Like us on Facebook to go in the draw to WIN a$150 voucher fordinneratyour INSIDE: AT proposes road repairs p2 Urban East feature p6-7 Sports news p10-11 favouritelocal restaurant GetaJumponthe Spring Market... Call EliseObern Great Smiles. P:(09) 536 7011 or (021) 182 5939 Better Health. E:[email protected] W: rwbeachlands.co.nz At Anthony Hunt Dental we have been A:81Second View Avenue, Beachlands East Tamaki proud to be serving our local community since 2011. Creating great smiles and FREE PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND better health for the whole family. MARKET UPDATE AVAILABLE NOW! Uniforms&Promotional Products FollowusonFacebook andInstagram Ray White Beachlands (09) 292 9071 [email protected] Lighthouse Real Estate Limited for specials, competitionsand giveaways 52 Papakura-Clevedon Road Licensed (REAA 2008) Cnr Smales and Springs Rds,EastTamaki-09 265 0300 www.ahdental.co.nz DEADLINES: Display advertising - 5pm Friday. Classifieds and News - midday Monday Ph: 536 5715 Email: [email protected] www.pctimes.nz 2 POHUTUKAWA COAST TIMES (6 September 2019) Guest editorial by Orere Community and Boating Association committee member Tim Greene GET IN TOUCH P: 536 5715 The last few years has seen the resi- scheme.
  • High Intensity Rainfall Design System Version 4

    High Intensity Rainfall Design System Version 4

    High Intensity Rainfall Design System Version 4 Prepared for Envirolink August 2018 Prepared by: Trevor Carey-Smith Roddy Henderson Shailesh Singh For any information regarding this report please contact: Trevor Carey-Smith Climate Scientist Climate Dynamics +64-4-386 0394 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie Wellington 6241 Phone +64 4 386 0300 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: 2018022CH Report date: August 2018 NIWA Project: ELF16250 Quality Assurance Statement Charles Pearson, National Manager, Reviewed by: Environmental Information Operations Formatting checked by: Fenella Falconer, Office Administrator Dr Sam Dean, Chief Scientist for Approved for release by: Climate, Atmosphere and Hazards Cover Image: Rainfall depths for 10-minute, 2-hour and 5-day duration events, all with recurrence intervals of 100 years. © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 8 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 9 2 Data .......................................................................................................................
  • Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel

    Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel

    BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARING PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 anD the Local Government (AucklanD TransItIonal ProvIsIons) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Topic 017 RUB South AND IN THE MATTER of the submIssions set out In the PartIes anD Issues Report ________________________________________________________________ JOINT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF COLIN EDWARD GEARY MACARTHUR AND DAVID JOHN ROBERT SMITH ON BEHALF OF BOB DEMLER 16 NOVEMBER 2015 ________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 30 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This Is a joint statement of evIdence prepared by ColIn MacArthur and Dave SmIth of Abley TransportatIon Consultants LImIted (Abley) who have been asked to evaluate the development and consequences of selectIng the Southern RUB for inclusion in the Preliminary AucklanD Unitary Plan, specIfIcally to determIne at a high level, If these processes are suffIcIently robust enough to Demonstrate the outcome represents an effIcIent anD effectIve use of lanD. 1.2 Our analysIs IDentIfIes a number of short comIngs In terms of thoroughness of the evaluation process anD consIDeration of alternative RUB areas that may offer more effIcIent land use than the current proposed Southern RUB. The analysIs demonstrates that greenfIeld development partIcularly in the vicinity of Pukekohe will result in greater adverse Impacts across the AucklanD transport network than alternatIve sites, resulting in less than optimal lanD use anD transportation integration. 1.3 These greater effects wIll necessitate signIfIcant transportatIon infrastructure investment to accommoDate the likely growth in traffic assocIated wIth Pukekohe. At present, these Investments are not planned or funded. 1.4 We concluDe that there remaIns an inaDequate Demonstration of a comprehensive assessment of all viable areas or total construction anD servicing costs, either through the applIcatIon of transportatIon moDellIng or DerIveD from a fIrst prIncIples approach.
  • Agenda of Rodney Local Board

    Agenda of Rodney Local Board

    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Rodney Local Board will be held on: Date: Wednesday 15 July 2020 Time: 3.00pm Meeting Room: Te Whare Oranga ō Parakai Venue: 5 Rere Place Parakai Rodney Local Board OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Phelan Pirrie Deputy Chairperson Beth Houlbrooke Members Brent Bailey Steve Garner Danielle Hancock Tim Holdgate Louise Johnston Vicki Kenny Colin Smith (Quorum 5 members) Robyn Joynes Democracy Advisor - Rodney 10 July 2020 Contact Telephone: +64 212447174 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson. Board Member Organisation Position Brent Bailey Royal NZ Yacht Squadron Member Steven Garner Warkworth Tennis and Squash Club President Sandspit Yacht Club Member Warkworth Gamefish Club Member Louise Johnston Blackbridge Environmental Protection Treasurer Society Vicki Kenny International Working Holidays Ltd Director/Owner/CEO Nannies Abroad Ltd Director/Owner/CEO Waitemata Riding Club Member Treasurer National Party Helensville Electorate Danielle Hancock Kaukapakapa Residents and Ratepayers Member Association Pest Free Kaukapakapa Pest Free Coordinator New Zealand Biosecurity Services Limited Operations Manager Tim Holdgate Landowners Contractors Protection Vice Chairman Association
  • RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY Adopted September 2010

    RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY Adopted September 2010

    RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY Adopted September 2010 RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY - Consultation Draft May 2010 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. CONSULTATION 3. BASIS OF THE RURAL STRATEGY 3.1 Reasons for the Rural Strategy 3.2 Purpose 3.3 Process 3.4 Background Research 3.5 Influences 3.6 Initial Consultation Feedback 3.7 Key Focus Issues 4. STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO THE ISSUES 4.1 Achieving Strategic Imperatives 4.2 Making the Strategy Work 5. SPECIFIC INITIATIVES 5.1 Tailored Management Approaches 5.2 Facilitating A Sustainable Rural Economy 5.3 Improving Development Location 5.4 Subdivision And Natural Area Protection 5.5 Protecting Important Landscapes 5.6 Rural Rates Policy 5.7 Rural Infrastructure 5.8 Restoring and Protecting Biodiversity 5.9 Maori Owned Land 6. WHERE TO FROM HERE 7. APPENDIX – Adopted September 2010 Rodney District Rural Strategy 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Strategic Imperatives The Rural Strategy is a long term (25 year) outcome focused strategy, the purpose The process of developing responses has identified a number of “strategic of which is to: imperatives”. These imperatives are outcomes that the Rural Strategy responses (in addressing the focus issues) are driving towards: foster a sustainable rural economy; protect and enhance rural landscapes and rural character; Viable productive land – for farming, horticulture viticulture, forestry and improve rural development outcomes for communities and the other primary production enterprises environment; Quality landscapes – a country look
  • Warkworth to Wellsford Operational Water — Design Technical Report

    Warkworth to Wellsford Operational Water — Design Technical Report

    :_ . '.',| 1;” I” $ ~ . ‘ firs: wet? .I III".- _ I. I. I. 1'f‘le . 151...!“ '-.r -....'_i ' ' - I I. I . .' . '4 .- 1 fi' II II.- I . A H I I'.‘ a.‘- ': ' I Ii" L'. 1‘); :Ii. :1! . 3"": i" h ll ' .+ - .a'. .- 1": .--' - i ‘ ' ' Warkworth to Wellsford Operational Water — Design Technical Report July 2019 Final Tony Cain Tim Fisher Brad Nobilo 05/07/2019 Tegan Blount GLOSSARY AND DEFINED TERMS Refer to the Water Assessment Report for a master glossary and defined terms table. 5? JACOBS [l LE1? Tonkin +Taylar TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Project description Purpose and scope of this report Overview of operational water management systems U'lNI—‘H EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Catchment description Existing infrastructure Topography |—\|—\ Geology I—‘O©\l\l OPERATIONAL WATER — DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND REQUIREMENTS Operational water design philosophy 14 Stormwater design guidelines and standards 15 Operational water management 16 Specific design requirements 17 OPERATIONAL WATER - DESIGN APPROACH 23 Operational water design 23 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 38 .1 Water quality 38 U'IU'IU1 .2 Water quantity 38 APPENDIX A: WETLAND DESIGN — SUMMARY TABLE 40 APPENDIX B: CULVERT DESIGN — SUMMARY TABLE 42 JACOBS W Tonkin +Taylor 1 INTRODUCTION The Warkworth to Wellsford Project (the Project) crosses the Mahurangi River, Hoteo River and tributaries of the Oruawharo River to the north of Auckland. These freshwater environments drain into the Mahurangi Harbour and Kaipara Harbour. This report has been prepared to support the Water Assessment Report for the Project, and provides details of the operational stormwater management and other operational phase mitigation by design. The Project involves the construction, operation and maintenance of a new four lane state highway.
  • PC 20 Rural Activity Status

    PC 20 Rural Activity Status

    #101 The following customer has submitted a Unitary Plan online submission. Contact details Full name of submitter: John O'Grady and Kevin O'Grady Organisation name: Agent's full name: Email address: [email protected] Contact phone number: Postal address: 152 Hinemoa Street Birkenhead Auckland 0626 Submission details This is a submission to: Plan modification number: Plan Change 20 Plan modification name: Rural Activity Status My submission relates to Rule or rules: The proposed changes to the Auckland Unitary Plan: A) add to the activity tables an activity that essentially makes any activity not provided for in the tables non-complying. B)amend references to "residential buildings" in the Rural chapter to "dwellings". Property address: Map or maps: Other provisions: Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes The reason for my or our views are: We write this submission as affected owners of a rural property at 33 Coutler Road Swanson. Our submission is in support of option 1 (page 10 section 4) to maintain the status quo where activities not listed in the activity table are Discretionary Activities under Chapter C General Rules, C1.7 Activities not provided for. The current policies provide Council with adequate provisions to manage the potential for inappropriate activities to establish in rural zones. Rural zones need to provide broad, sustainable, affordable and user friendly provisions to adequately provide for and manage future advancements in Innovation and Technology. The current test for Landowners in support of Resource consent applications is more sustainable and cost effective.
  • Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967

    Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967

    Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 PREFACE This booklet is prepared as a Memorial to those who carried on the work of the Methodist Church in the Port Albert Circuit. Ministers, Home Missionaries and their wives; Students and Local Preachers, Youth Workers and all who have helped construct and maintain the buildings. Many whose names are not mentioned in this short history have contributed to and shared the Faith. Our especial thanks to Rev. E. W. Hames for preparing and writing this brief account. H. Neal and L. W. Bennett for Church Trust. "THE BEST OF ALL IS GOD IS WITH US." To give and give and give again What God has given thee To spend thyself nor count the cost To serve right gloriously The God who gave all worlds that are And all that are to be. (Studdart Kennedy) Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 Methodism in Port Albert It should not be necessary to tell again at length the 'story of the Albertland settlements. This has been done fully and ably in THE ALBERTLANDERS by Sir Henry Brett and Henry Hook, published 1927, and in the Albertland Centennial Booklet, 1962. The founders of the district planned to do on a smaller scale on behalf of English Nonconformists what had already been accomplished by the Scottish Free Church in Otago and by the Anglicans in Canterbury. It must not be forgotten that at this date the Nonconformists were still second-class citizens in England. Those who joined the Association were fired by the ambition to acquire broad acres in a country where they might hope to be free from the disabilities that still attached to them in the land of their birth.
  • 1502 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 55

    1502 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 55

    1502 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 55 Taihape, Town Hall. Rodney Electoral District­ Taoroa Public Hall. Ahuroa Public School. Tiriraukawa Public School. Albany Public School. Tokorangi Public School. Albany South, Mr M. J. Sheffield's Garage. Upper Tutaenui Public Hall. Algie's Bay, Store. Utiku Public School. Ararua Public School. Waitohi Public School. Brighams Creek, Presbyterian Church Hall. Waituna West Public School. Browns Bay West, 884 East Coast Road, Mr R. B. K. Camp- bell's Garage. Coatesville Public School. Dairy Flat Public School. Glorit Public School. Greenhithe Public School. Hakaru, Library Hall. Helensville, War Memorial Hall. Remuera Electoral District- Herald Island, Fire Station. Green Lane, Great South Road and Green Lane West corner, Hobsonville Public Hall. Congregational Church Hall. Huapai Public School. Meadowbank- Hukatere Public School. Meadowbank Road, Community Hall. Kaipara Flats Public School. Meadowbank Road, St. Chads Hall. Kaiwaka, Community Centre War Memorial Hall. Waiatarua Road, Meadowbank School. Kakanui Maori School. One Tree Hill- Kaukapakapa Public School. Gardner Road, Epsom Presbyterian Church Hall. Kawau Island, Yacht Club's Clubhouse. Green Lane West and Wheturangi Road, Cornwall Park, Kourawhero Hall. District School Hall. Kumeu, Baptist Church Youth Club Hall. Green Lane West, Cornwall Hospital X-ray Hall. Leigh Public School. Green Lane West, Green Lane and National Women's Makarau Public Hall. Hospitals. Mangawhai Public School. Ngaire Avenue, Gospel Hall Schoolroom. Mangawhai Heads, Church of Christ Youth Camp. Ranfurly Road East, St. George's Hall. Manly, Methodist Church Hall. Remuera- Mareretu, Mr G. W. Burke's Garage. 61 Arney Road, Mr J. L. Innes's Garage. Marohemo Hall. Ascot Avenue and St.
  • Supplementary Evidence Provided in Support of Counties Power Limited's

    Supplementary Evidence Provided in Support of Counties Power Limited's

    Supplementary evidence provided in support of Counties Power Limited's presentation to the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel in respect of Topic 016/017 RUB North/West and RUB South IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan Change 12 to the Auckland Council District Plan: Papakura Section, Proposed Private Plan Change 38 to the Auckland Council District Plan: Franklin Section, Proposed Plan Change 19 to the Auckland Regional Policy Statement, ( ) and Proposed Plan Change 3 to the Auckland Council Regional Plan: Air, Land, and Water STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE BY MAURICE HOSKINS FOR COUNTIES POWER LIMITED Introduction 1. My full name is Maurice Max Hoskins and I am the Planning Engineer with Counties Power Limited. I hold the degrees of Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) from the University of Canterbury and Certificate of Electrical Engineering Supply. I have practised as an Electrical Engineer for 38 years working in New Zealand, 2 years in the United Kingdom and 2 years in Saudi Arabia. 2. I was appointed as the Planning Engineer in 1994 and as such I am responsible for the medium and long term planning of the power system in Counties Power. Particular emphasis in this role is placed on the planning of subtransmission, substations and distribution feeders. 3. The purpose of my evidence is to outline the wider significance of the 11 OkV lines that run through the Drury South Structure Plan (DSSP) area, to confirm the difference between supplying a new industrial area and a new residential area, to provide a brief overview of how Counties Power intends to supply power to the DSSP area, and to confirm the importance of retaining flexibility with respect to these distribution lines.
  • A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand: Auckland Conservancy

    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand: Auckland Conservancy

    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand AUCKLAND CONSERVANCY Whangapoua Wetlands (6) Location: 36o09'S, 175o25'E. On the northeast side of Great Barrier Island in the Hauraki Gulf, North Island. Area: c.340 ha. Altitude: Sea level. Overview: The Whangapoua wetlands include Whangapoua Estuary, an associated sandspit and an adjoining area of freshwater wetland. Also included in the wetland area is the Mabey Farm stream which was formerly part of the Whangapoua wetland before Mabeys Road was formed. The estuary shows little sign of modification, and it is partly for this reason that it has been classified as having outstanding values as a wildlife habitat. The importance of this estuary is based on the whole ecosystem rather than individual species, although it is home to some threatened species. The wildlife in the Whangapoua wetlands is the most diverse on the island, with some 36 species of native and introduced birds, one of the most important being the Brown Teal Anas aucklandica chlorotis, which is one of New Zealand's most endangered waterfowl species. Physical features: Inland are volcanic rocks of andesitic and rhyolitic composition. The land to the north of Whangapoua is a basement of greywacke and argillite; around the estuary and the Okiwi Basin are alluvial deposits of Quaternary age, and the shore is derived from sediments from the local catchments. The sandspit and the beach are made up of sands accumulated in the last 6000 years after the last glaciation. Water quality in the estuary is high, and there is a low level of turbidity. This is related to the low density of development in the catchment, the relatively intact nature of the swamp and its margins, and the high level of tidal flushing; the estuary almost completely empties each tidal cycle.
  • KIA PUĀWAI a PUKEKOHE Unlock Pukekohe High-Level Project Plan

    KIA PUĀWAI a PUKEKOHE Unlock Pukekohe High-Level Project Plan

    KIA PUĀWAI A PUKEKOHE Unlock Pukekohe High-Level Project Plan November 2019 ABBREVIATIONS AT Auckland Transport BID Business Improvement District CCO Council-controlled organisation the Council Auckland Council HLPP High Level Project Plan LTP Long-term plan Panuku Panuku Development Auckland 2 PUKEKOHE HLPP CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 THE KEY MOVES – WHERE WE WILL 43 APPENDICES 83 Planning to unlock Pukekohe’s potential 7 FOCUS OUR ENERGY AND EFFORTS Appendix 1: 84 Mihi 8 Three precinct redevelopment key moves 45 Property map of town centre sites Panuku – who we are 9 Three public realm key moves 49 (excluding sites outside of the programme boundary) What we do – shaping spaces for Aucklanders to love 10 Two placemaking key moves 54 Appendix 2: 85 A range of partnering opportunities 56 ABOUT THIS HIGH-LEVEL PROJECT PLAN 13 Property map of all sites and the What’s in the plan 14 HOW WE PLAN TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROJECT 59 full extent of the programme area investment boundary Why Pukekohe? 15 Our approach to delivery 60 Appendix 3: 86 Developing the Kia Puāwai a Pukekohe story 16 Development of key properties 60 Property schedule Working with mana whenua 17 Funding 63 Our partners 18 Other resources 63 ABOUT PUKEKOHE 21 INFORMATION USED TO DEVELOP THIS PLAN 65 A strategic location 22 Other plans and policies 66 A diverse and growing community 24 Transport infrastructure 70 The Kia Puāwai a Pukekohe area and properties 26 Infrastructure capacity 71 Property market dynamics and demand 72 VISION 29 COMMUNICATING WITH THE COMMUNITY 75 THE PRINCIPLES