Report on the Heritage Front Affair
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. File No.: 2800-54 THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR REPORT TO THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA SECURITY INTELLIGENCE REVIEW COMMITTEE December 9, 1994 • .s4- s43 File No.: 2800-54 C.D._ THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR REPORT TO THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA UBRARY SOLICITOR Cit0ERAL CANADA JAN 4 1995 RZLICTI-t.UE r:/-% re.ileRAL CANADA i(r;TARIO) ...•■•111■••■•••10.1.1,.. SECURITY INTELLIGENCE REVIEW COMMITTEE December 9, 1994 Dream furniture is the only kind on which you never stub your toes or bang your knee. C.S. Lewis (1898-1963) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE METHODOLOGY 1-7 FOREWARD 1-2 I. OVERVIEW OF THE EXTREME RIGHT 1-5 1.1 The New Groups 1 1.2 Recent Racism 3 1.3 The 1990's 5 M. TARGETING THE EXTREMISTS 1 - 5 2.1 Targeting the Extremists 1 2.2 The First Certificates of the 90's 2 2.3 The Second Targeting Series 3 2.4 The Current Certificate 5 III. ALLEGED WHITE SUPREMACIST INFORMANT 1 - 15 3.1 Background 1 3.2 The Radical Right 3 3.3 Trip to Libya - Founding the Heritage Front 6 IV. THE HERITAGE FRONT EMERGES 1 - 11 4.1 Events in 1990 1 4.2 The Heritage Front in 1991 2 4.3 Reform Investigation and Clashes with Anti-Racists 5 4.4 The Harassment Campaign Peaks 7 4.5 Leave Taking 10 V. INFORMATION COLLECTION AND HARASSMENT 1-42 5.1 Overview 1 5.2 White Supremacist Information Highway 1 5.3 The Hate Line 3 5.4 The Rise of the Anti-Racist Groups 3 5.5 Recruiting at High Schools 5 5.6 Machine Busters 6 5.7 The "IT" Campaign 8 5.8 Information Collection on the ARA 11 5.9 Harassment of ARA Members 11 5.10 Harassment and Contact with Jewish Groups 26 5.11 The Morgentaler Bombing 39 5.12 Contacts with the Police 40 VI. THE FUNDING OF THE SOURCE IN THE HERITAGE FRONT 1-12 6.1 CSIS Payments to the Source 1 6.2 Expenses 2 6.3 Loss-of-Employment Compensation 5 6.4 The Source's Financial Situation 6 6.5 CSIS Assistance to the Heritage Front 7 6.6 Value of Information and Assistance 9 6.7 Conclusions 12 VII. REFORM PARTY 1-60 7.1 The First Meeting 1 7.2 The International Centre Rally 5 7.3 The Plots Against Reform 11 7.4 Headquarters Instructions and Debates 24 7.5 Final Act 31 7.6 Conspiracies and Plots 37 7.7 Other Issues 54 VIII. THE REFORM PARTY AND A FOREIGN COUNTRY 1-7 8.1 The Tip 1 8.2 The International Environment 2 8.3 The Targeting Decision 2 8.4 The Investigation 4 8.5 Finaings 6 IX. THE METZGER AND MAGUIRE INCIDENTS 1-10 9.1 The Arrest of Sean Maguire 1 9.2 The Metzger Visit 4 X. THE SOURCE AND THE LEGAL PROCESS 1 - 3 10.1 Zundel's Legal Plans 1 10.2 A Discussion about David Irving 1 10.3 Doan Discusses Legal Strategy 2 10.4 Defence Creativity 2 10.5 Solicitor-Client Communications 2 XI. BRISTOW AND CSIS ALLEGED SPYING ON POSTAL WORKERS 1 - 7 11.1 Introduction 1 11.2 The Briefing Note 2 11.3 The CBC's Second Offensive 3 11.4 The SIRC Investigation 4 11.5 Summary 6 XII. SPYING ON THE CBC 1 - 5 12.1 Did CSIS Spy on the CBC? 2 12.2 Did CSIS Lawfully Obtain the Information about the Possible CBC Program? 2 12.3 What Did CSIS Know Prior to Reporting the Information? 2 12.4 Can CSIS Collect Such Information? 3 12.5 CSIS and the Minister 4 12.6 Strictly Necessary 4 12.7 Conclusion 5 lii XIII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1-15 13.1 Source in the Heritage Front 1 13.2 Leadership of the Heritage Front 1 13.3 Recruiting and Funding 2 13.4 The Harassment Campaign 3 13.5 Infiltrating the Reform Party 5 13.6 The Reform Party and a Foreign Government 9 13.7 Maguire and Metzger 9 13.8 Spying on the CBC 11 13.9 Spying on the Postal Workers/Union 11 13.10 The Media and the Heritage Front Affair 11 13.11 Ministerial Direction - CSIS and Policy Concerning Sources 12 13.12 Overview 15 ANNEX A: HOW THE TARGETING PROCESS WORKS 1-3 GLOSSARY 1-3 iv METHODOLOGY The Review Committee has provided a large number of reports to the Solicitor General of Canada. Some of them have been voluminous, some quite brief. This report on "The Heritage Front Affair" comes somewhere between those extremes. In order to describe what we set out to achieve in this investigation, we feel that we can do no better than quote from our Chairman's statement to the Parliamentary Sub-Committee on National Security on September 13, 1994. Only the readers of the report can judge whether we achieved the goals we set for ourselves. "First of all, Mr. Chairman, let me explain what we are doing. As soon as the press report appeared in the Toronto Sun on Sunday, August 14 , we commenced an investigation to find out exactly what CSIS was doing in this area. We had already looked at CSIS activities regarding "extremist groups" in 1990 to early 1991 and reported on the problems we found in our 1990-91 and 1991-92 Annual Reports. That review looked at all investigations underway at the time. It was designed to make sure that: only leaders who could reaso.nably be described as "threats to national security" were being investigated; that the intrusiveness of the investigations was proportionate to the possible threat; and that there was no intrusion on innocent people's privacy. Our review focused on the legality of investigative techniques used by CSIS, including human sources. - 2 - The review we have underway-now will examine every aspect of all allegations that have been made; down to the smallest detail and including everything even remotely relevant to the case. The law gives us absolute and complete authority to look at every file, examine any document (except Cabinet Confidences), or interview any person we consider necessary. Contrary to the impression you may have received from the news media, there are no limitations whatsoever on our access to information held by CSIS. In this case, we are exercising to the full the extraordinary powers given to us by Parliament. But, as you know, Parliament also decided that the results of our reviews should be passed to the Solicitor General pursuant to section 54 of the Act. The Minister must then decide how much of our report can be made public without endangering national security. Only in our Annual Report can we decide what to make public. We are seeking answers to the following questions: 1. Possible CSIS Source in the Heritage Front a. Was there a CSIS human source or sources in the Heritage Front and/or associated organizations? If so, what was the reason for this? b. Did a CSIS source either alone or with others prompt the creation of the Heritage Front? c. Did CSIS allow a source to establish or become an executive member of the Heritage Front? If so, what limitations did the Service place on his or her - 3 - participation? What were the reasons underlying the CSIS decisions? d. If there was a CSIS source in place, what is the likelihood that the Heritage Front would have been established if that source had not been present? e. Did a source direct the development of the Heritage Front computerized hate-line? f. Did a source help to create and sustain the Heritage Front by providing it with substantial funding directly (donations) or indirectly (paydng for accommodation, transportation, etc.)? g. Did a source actively promote the Heritage Front in a non-financial manner? How? 2. Infiltration of the Reform Party a. Did the Heritage Front provide security for Reform Party meetings in 1991? In 1992? b. If so, how did this come about? c. Did a CSIS source play a role in arranging Heritage Front security for Reform Party- meetings in 1991 and 1992? How many rallies and when? d. Did CSIS authorize a source to collect information on the Reform Party? If so, did CSIS receive political direction in that regard? - 4 - e.