How a United Church Congregation Articulates Its Choices from the 41St General Council's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How a United Church Congregation Articulates Its Choices from the 41St General Council's “What Language Shall I Borrow?” How a United Church Congregation Articulates its Choices from the 41st General Council’s Recommendations Regarding Peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine by Donna Patricia Kerrigan A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emmanuel College and the Toronto School of Theology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Ministry awarded by Emmanuel College and the University of Toronto © Copyright by Donna Patricia Kerrigan 2016 “What Language Shall I Borrow?” How a United Church Congregation Articulates its Choices from the 41st General Council’s Recommendations Regarding Peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine Donna Patricia Kerrigan Doctor of Ministry Emmanuel College and the University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The thesis of this dissertation is that members of the United Church of Canada who respond to the Report on Israel/Palestine Policy select from its peacebuilding recommendations according to their attitudes to theological contextualizing. Two attitudes give rise to two different methods, which are seldom articulated but underlie choices regarding peace initiatives such as boycotting or ecumenical/multifaith cooperation. The dissertation includes five parts: an investigation of contextual theologies for peacebuilders; a history of the UCC and ecumenical partners who have struggled to assist peace in Israel/Palestine; strategies for peace-minded ministers; a case-study of one congregation choosing peace strategies; and recommendations for denominational communications and peacebuilding. This thesis poses a taxonomy for theologizing in context, moving from initial interaction with the other by translating local systems of thought into terms of the Gospel message. Contextualizers proceed either to immerse in the local culture (anthropological) or to engage with locals in mutual learning (synthesis). Anthropological attitudes tend toward praxis method. Synthetic attitudes tend toward transcendental method. ii An examination of the UCC and its ecumenical partners shows how anthropological/praxis and synthesis/transcendental modalities have led to differing approaches to, and varying levels of grassroots engagement in, peacebuilding in the Middle-East. For UCC members, the IPP Report offers initiatives that cohere with both modalities, and the case study here shows selected congregants investigating all possibilities and choosing according to their theological commitment to love. This thesis advocates for improved communications and more persuasive reports from the national church, more frequent qualitative research at the grassroots, and persistent search for “a small way” into peace by privileging many voices. iii Acknowledgements All research projects are the product of many generous hearts and minds, and this thesis is a fine example. I am indebted to members of my congregation for their encouragement, and most particularly for having faith in me as we arranged Peace Sunday. This project depended upon peer–reviewers and participants in the focus group, who were outstandingly generous with their time and insights in ways I can never repay. I’m also deeply grateful for the guidance of my professors, especially Dr Joseph Schner at Toronto School of Theology and Drs Pamela Couture and Thomas Reynolds at Emmanuel College. Finally, my family members have sustained me along the way, and I acknowledge that I can’t even borrow language to thank them for their patience and love. iv Glossary of Key Terms Abrahamic faiths the Jewish, Christian and Muslim faiths—all of which trace the birth of their religion to the patriarch, Abraham BDS Boycott, Divestment and Sanction—a movement many hold to be a form of nonviolent protest, currently against Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory. BDS seeks to boycott a wide range of Israeli-made goods, shed investments in corporations that are seen to profit from or assist in the occupation, and support sanctions against Israel and its presence on various international forums. The United Church, by adopting the Report of the Working Group on Israel/Palestine Policy (2012), rejected participation in BDS on the grounds that it is too broad and the movement has in some cases had unacceptable goals. (See “Focused Economic Action,” IPP Report, 100.) That aspect of UCC policy was revisited by the 42nd General Council, 2015, with the responsible commission recommending consultation and education on the issue of BDS as part of the denomination’s policy. contextual theology the over-arching recognition of all theologians that our attempts to understand our faith as God’s living creatures occur in, and are influenced by, the time and place of our existence. This recognition or sensibility has become particularly keen thanks to twentieth century developments such as feminist theology, Asian theology, liberation theology, and the like. For this Doctor of Ministry thesis project, the sensibility toward contextualization is primary, based on Clemens Sedmak’s observation, “Humility is the art of living in a village, the art of being down to earth. Doing local [i.e. contextual] theology is a service, like washing v feet.”1 The claim in this thesis is that doing theology in another’s context involves one of two primary pre-dispositions –the anthropological and the synthetic—leading to the choice of two methodologies—praxis and transcendence. conversation face-to-face speaking encounters that, to be genuine, require of participants an openness to discovering new truths about the world, about each other, or perhaps about themselves. Such encounters require participants to maintain a balance between a strong commitment to their faith values and a willingness to appreciate the other speaker’s perspective, perhaps even to consider the possibility of conversion under the influence of that perspective.2 economic action a recommendation of the United Church to its members regarding their purchase of goods produced by Israelis on the occupied territory of Palestine. The group working on the Israel/Palestine Policy Report (2012) preferred the term “economic action” to “boycott,” which had been used in a motion brought to the 40th General Council (2009), ostensibly to distance their recommendation of “focused action” from the BDS movement (see above). ecumenical late Latin from Greek oikoumenikos, from oikoumenē ‘the (inhabited) earth.’ The word has a distinctly Christian meaning, denoting dialogue, cooperation or unity among Christian 1 Clemens Sedmak, Doing Local Theology (Maryknoll NY: Orbis Books, 2002), 17. 2 Here I am indebted to both Gadamer and Lonergan for notions of what constitutes the hallmark of genuine encounter with the other. Gadamer sets the bar at appreciating another’s perspective to the point of eliminating the sense of threat that comes of not appreciating. See Hans-Georg Gadamer with Carsten Dutt, and others. Gadamer In Conversation: Reflections and Commentary, ed and trans by Richard E. Palmer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001), 11. Lonergan on the other hand stresses the possibility of conversion when one is exposed to a different perspective and then undertakes the often difficult task of understanding and judging. See Bernard Lonergan, Method in Theology (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007), 239-41. vi denominations. Used familiarly, the word has in some contexts broadened to include a multi-faith (Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, etc) or even no-faith, dimension—perhaps suggesting a return to its earlier embrace of all earth’s human inhabitants. embedded theology theological content that shapes, often unconsciously, the thoughts and opinions of the faithful. In this thesis, the word “predisposition” is used to set aside the issue of consciousness while indicating theological formation. GC 40, GC 41, GC 42 40th General Council (Kelowna, 2009) and 41st General Council (Ottawa, 2012), 42nd General Council (Corner Brook, 2015) of the United Church of Canada, a conciliar church grassroots the most basic level of an organization, “the ordinary people.” In the United Church, each congregation’s official governing body constitutes a “court” with voting rights and responsibilities, for example in the case of some types of remit. HMUC Henson Mills United Church (pseudonym), the research site for this thesis. IPP Report formally titled The Report of the Working Group on Israel/Palestine Policy (2012). Commissioned by the 40th GC (2009), this report was adopted as United Church policy and offered to the membership for “study, prayerful discernment and personal action” in relation to Israel and Palestine.3 justice/peace denotes the interdependent relationship between justice and peace. Tannenbaum peacebuilder Yehezkel Landau suggests that the six points of the star of David indicate study of the Torah, worship, acts of lovingkindness, truth, justice and peace. Peace 3 See “The Working Group on Israel/Palestine Policy (2012),” http://www.united- church.ca/beliefs/policies/2012/w536 (accessed June 2015). vii must be a complicated entity, closely related to all other qualities, he explains. Particularly, he draws from Zachariah 8:16: “Render in your gates judgments that are true and make for peace.” A comprehensive peace, he concludes, needs inclusive justice, which is grounded in truth.4 Kairos Palestine Complete title is A Moment of Truth: Kairos Palestine. (Not to be confused with KAIROS, a Canadian ecumenical movement dedicated to the pursuit of justice in peace in Canada and internationally.) Kairos Palestine was introduced in 2011 to Canadians by the
Recommended publications
  • Canada and the Middle East Today: Electoral Politics and Foreign Policy
    CANADA AND THE MIDDLE EAST TODAY: ELECTORAL POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY Donald Barry Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper came to power in 2006 with little experience in foreign affairs but with a well developed plan to transform his minority Conservative administration into a majority government replacing the Liberals as Canada’s “natural governing party.”1 Because his party’s core of Anglo-Protestant supporters was not large enough to achieve this goal, Harper appealed to non- traditional Conservatives, including Jews, on the basis of shared social values. His efforts were matched by those of Jewish leaders and the government of Israel to win the backing of the government and its followers in the face of declining domestic support for Israel and the rise of militant Islamic fundamentalism. These factors accelerated a change in Canada’s Middle East policy that began under Prime Minister Paul Martin, from a carefully balanced stance to one that overwhelm- ingly favors Israel. Harper’s “pro-Israel politics,” Michelle Collins observes, has “won the respect—and support—of a large segment of Canada’s organized Jewish community.”2 However, it has isolated Canada from significant shifts in Middle East diplomacy and marginalized its ability to play a constructive role in the region. Harper and the Jewish Vote When he became leader of the Canadian Alliance party, which merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the Conservative Party of Canada in 2004, Tom Flanagan says that Harper realized “The traditional Conservative base of Anglophone Protestants [was] too narrow to win modern Canadian elections.”3 In a speech to the conservative organization Civitas, in 2003, Harper argued that the only way to achieve power was to focus not on the tired wish list of economic conservatives or “neo-cons,” as they’d become known, but on what he called “theo-cons”—those social conservatives who care passionately about hot-button issues that turn on family, crime, and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • All of Us? Marginalizing Dissent in Toronto's Jewish Community
    ALL OF US? MARGINALIZING DISSENT IN TORONTO'S JEWISH COMMUNITY AMY SARAH KATZ A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO April, 2015 © Amy Sarah Katz, 2015 ABSTRACT Mainstream Jewish institutions like the Canadian Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs and B'nai Brith Canada largely communicate the impression of community-wide support for Israeli government policies and actions to the broader society. When Jewish individuals and groups in Toronto who do not uniformly support Israeli government policy and actions attempt to make their voices heard as Jews they can encounter discursive techniques used by institutions and more broadly to marginalize their points of view. These discursive techniques are not limited to Jewish institutions or to the Jewish community, but, rather, can be characteristic of some processes that serve to 'naturalize' specific ideas and marginalize others. I use elements of Critical Discourse Analysis to explore recent public communications reflecting responses to dissenting Toronto Jews and narratives to identify some of these discursive techniques. I also explore how aspects of selected mainstream Jewish Canadian histories can serve to marginalize present-day dissent. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to my parents, Sheila and Morton Katz, for your humour and for sharing your stories. Thank you to my sister, Jenny Katz, for being you, for inspiring me to try harder, and for making me and so many other people believe some version of coherence is possible. Thank you to my committee Patrick Taylor, Ester Reiter and Michael Ornstein for your insight, kindness and generosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Jewish Libraries N E W S L E T T E R February/March 2008 Volume XXVII, No
    Association of Jewish Libraries N E W S L E T T E R February/March 2008 Volume XXVII, No. 3 JNUL Officially Becomes The National Library of Israel ELHANAN ADL E R On November 26, 2007, The Knesset enacted the “National Li- assistance of the Yad Hanadiv foundation, which previously brary Law,” transforming the Jewish National and University contributed the buildings of two other state bodies: the Knesset, Library (JNUL) at The Hebrew University’s Givat Ram campus and the Supreme Court. The new building will include expanded into the National Library of Israel. reading rooms and state-of-the-art storage facilities, as well as The JNUL was founded in 1892 by the Jerusalem Lodge of a planned Museum of the Book. B’nai B’rith. After the first World War, the library’s ownership The new formal status and the organizational change will was transferred to the World Zionist Organization. With the enable the National Library to expand and to serve as a leader opening of the Hebrew University on the Mount Scopus campus in its scope of activities in Israel, to broaden its links with simi- in 1925, the library was reorganized into the Jewish National and lar bodies in the world, and to increase its resources via the University Library and has been an administrative unit of the government and through contributions from Israel and abroad. Hebrew University ever since. With the founding of the State The law emphasizes the role of the Library in using technology of Israel the JNUL became the de facto national library of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Conference the United Church of Canada the 89 Annual
    Maritime Conference The United Church of Canada The 89th Annual Meeting Sackville, New Brunswick May 22 - 25, 2014 SECTION 1 REPORTS TO CONFERENCE President’s Message This past year has gone by faster than I’d ever anticipated. I have already visited three Presbyteries, and been guest-preacher at two pastoral charges; I am scheduled to visit three more presbyteries, and Bermuda Synod, over the next two months. I have had the privilege of representing Maritime Conference on a number of pastoral occasions. And each visit I have done, has impressed me with the dedication of the church folk who are there. There is confusion and sadness, certainly, as many see attendance falling away from regular Sunday worship services, and as our congregations age. But there is also a sense of excitement, as pastoral charges and congregations start to explore new ways of being church in their communities and in their world. Home church, mission church, coffee bar church, shared ministry, cyber congregations —all are part of the options opening up to those who are passionate about being the hands and feet of Christ. As I sit at my desk this (very!) cold February afternoon, I am reminded of the words of the hymn that tells us, “In the cold and snow of winter, there’s a spring that waits to be, unrevealed until its season, something God alone can see!” Our church is in that waiting stage. We are waiting to see what sort of spring is coming for our church, our mission, our identities as people of faith and a community of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundy St. Lawrence Dawning Waters Regional Council the United Church of Canada
    Fundy St. Lawrence Dawning Waters Regional Council The United Church of Canada The 2nd Annual Meeting Virtual Meeting September 26, 2020 REPORTS TO REGION Every week, regardless of what church I find myself in, regardless of what community of faith has welcomed me, we pray these words ‘…your kingdom come’. Just what does that mean? What does it mean for us as Fundy St Lawrence Dawning Waters? What does it mean for the United Church of Canada? What does it mean for the Christian church as a whole? Brian McLaren writes “Jesus proposed a transformative vision of God. God isn't the one who condemns the poor and weak. God isn't the one who favors the rich and righteous. God isn't the one who ordains the rich to be in the castle and the poor to be in the gutter. God is the one who loves everyone, including the people the rest of us think don't count.” This year has been a continuation of transformation within our church as we continue to live into our new structure and to say goodbye to the old. As we work through our first year as elected officers of the new Region, there are joys and sorrows, losses and blessings. From my personal point of view, it has offered me an opportunity to spend time with the people who are the Fundy St Lawrence Dawning Waters region. I have traveled throughout New Brunswick and PEI and I have had the privilege to meet with and listen to stories from the most amazing people.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement: Activism Across Borders for Palestinian Justice Suzanne Morrison A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 75,359 words. 2 Abstract On 7 July 2005, a global call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) was declared to people around the world to enact boycott initiatives and pressure their respective governments to sanction Israel until it complies with international law and respects universal principles of human rights. The call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian associations, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, charities, and other Palestinian groups. The call mentioned how broad BDS campaigns were utilized in the South African struggle against apartheid, and how these efforts served as an inspiration to those seeking justice for Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Recommendations of Board of Review
    REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF BOARD OF REVIEW Appointed pursuant to s. 44(1) of the Canada Post Corporation Act to Review the Interim Prohibitory Orders dated May 26, 2016 Issued Against Leroy St. Germaine, Laurence Victor St. Germaine and James Sears pursuant to s. 43(1) of the Canada Post Corporation Act 0 | P a g e Table of Contents BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1) Standing .................................................................................................................................. 5 2) Notice of Constitutional Question .......................................................................................... 6 3) Preliminary Issues ................................................................................................................... 6 4) Request for Adjournment Pending Outcome of Criminal Proceedings .................................. 6 HEARING ON THE MERITS ................................................................................................................... 7 1) Evidence .................................................................................................................................. 8 2) Submissions ............................................................................................................................ 8 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BDS: How a Controversial Non Violent Movement Has Transformed The
    8/6/2019 BDS: how a controversial non-violent movement has transformed the Israeli-Palestinian debate | News | The Guardian BDS: how a controversial nonviolent movement has transformed the sraeliPalestinian debate Israel sees the international boycott campaign as an existential threat to the Jewish state. Palestinians regard it as their last resort. By Nathan Thrall Main image: Bethlehem, June 2015. Photograph: Thomas Coex/AFP/Getty Images Tue 14 Aug 2018 06.00 BST he movement for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel – known as BDS – has been driving the world a little bit mad. Since its founding 13 years ago, it has acquired nearly as many enemies as the Israelis and Palestinians combined. It has hindered the efforts of Arab states to fully break their own decades-old boycott in pursuit of increasingly overt cooperation with Israel. It has shamed the Palestinian Authority government in Ramallah by denouncing its security and Teconomic collaboration with Israel’s army and military administration. It has annoyed the Palestine Liberation Organization by encroaching on its position as the internationally recognised advocate and representative of Palestinians worldwide. It has infuriated the Israeli government by trying to turn it into a leper among liberals and progressives. It has exasperated what is left of the Israeli peace camp by nudging the Palestinians away from an anti-occupation struggle and towards an anti-apartheid one. It has induced such an anti-democratic counter-campaign by the Israeli government that it has made Israeli liberals fear for the future of their country. And it has caused major headaches for the Palestinians’ donor governments in Europe, which are pressured by Israel not to work with BDS-supporting organisations in the Palestinian territories, an impossible request given that nearly all major civil society groups in Gaza and the West Bank support the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science The
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LSE Theses Online The London School of Economics and Political Science The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement: Activism Across Borders for Palestinian Justice Suzanne Morrison A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 75,359 words. 2 Abstract On 7 July 2005, a global call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) was declared to people around the world to enact boycott initiatives and pressure their respective governments to sanction Israel until it complies with international law and respects universal principles of human rights. The call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian associations, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, charities, and other Palestinian groups. The call mentioned how broad BDS campaigns were utilized in the South African struggle against apartheid, and how these efforts served as an inspiration to those seeking justice for Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid 499 Fonds 499 United Church of Canada
    FINDING AID 499 FONDS 499 UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA OFFICE OF THE MODERATOR AND GENERAL SECRETARY FONDS UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA Accession Number 1982.002C Accession Number 2004.060C Accession Number 2017.091C Accession Number 1983.069C Accession Number 2004.104C Accession Number 2017.111C Accession Number 1988.123C Accession Number 2004.104C Accession Number 2017.149C Accession Number 1989.161C Accession Number 2005.129C Accession Number 2018.047C Accession Number 1991.163C Accession Number 2006.001C/TR Accession Number 2018.060C/TR Accession Number 1991.196C Accession Number 2007.002C Accession Number 2018.062C Accession Number 1992.074C Accession Number 2007.017C Accession Number 2018.070C Accession Number 1992.082C Accession Number 2007.024C Accession Number 2018.083C Accession Number 1992.085C Accession Number 2007.034C Accession Number 2018.085C Accession Number 1993.076C Accession Number 2008.059C Accession Number 2018.104C/TR Accession Number 1993.144C Accession Number 2009.007C Accession Number 2018.114C Accession Number 1994.045C Accession Number 2009.008C Accession Number 2018.120C Accession Number 1994.162C Accession Number 2009.101C Accession Number 2018.128C Accession Number 1994.172C/TR Accession Number 2009.110C/TR Accession Number 2018.134C/TR Accession Number 1996.026C Accession Number 2010.034C/TR Accession Number 2018.157C Accession Number 1998.167C/TR Accession Number 2012.139C Accession Number 2018.199C Accession Number 2000.100C Accession Number 2014.003C/TR Accession Number 2018.249C/TR Accession Number 2000.117C
    [Show full text]
  • Boycott Divestment Sanctions (Bds) Against Israel an Anti- Semitic, Anti- Peace Poison Pill
    BOYCOTT DIVESTMENT SANCTIONS (BDS) AGAINST ISRAEL AN ANTI- SEMITIC, ANTI- PEACE POISON PILL BY DR. HAROLD BRACKMAN SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER MARCH 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 6 BDS and “the Durban Strategy” for Destroying Israel Not All Boycott Movements Are the Same 7 BDS Movement and Sharansky’s “3Ds” Test for Anti-Semitism 9 BDS’s Multiple Battlefields: From Boardroom to Union Halls To Supermarkets 12 Academic Institutions and the BDS’ Jihad Against Israel 14 BDS’ “Shaming” Cultural War on Israel 16 The Churches and the BDS’ Theology of Hate 17 In their own words: 19 Defenders of BDS 19 Critics of BDS: 20 Conclusion 23 Appendix: BDS Hall of Shame—A Chronology 24 Endnotes 30 copyright 2013 www.wiesenthal.com BOYCOTT DIVESTMENT SANCTIONS (BDS) AGAINST ISRAEL AN ANTI- SEMITIC, ANTI- PEACE POISON PILL 1 preface For decades, diplomats, politicians, and pundits have weighed in as to how best bring peace to the Holy Land. In 2013, U.S. President Barack Obama is paying his first presidential visit to Israel and the Palestinian Territories to try to reboot hopes for peace. There is, however, one campaign—BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions)—that presents itself as a pro-peace initiative but in reality is a thinly-veiled, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic “poison pill,” whose goal is the demonization, delegitimization, and ultimate demise of the Jewish State. Taking a page from the late twentieth century worldwide campaign against the South African Apartheid regime, BDS casts a global anti-Israel net on campuses, among unions, entertainers and Churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for a Grant 899112 Identification This Page Will Be Made Available to Selection Committee Members and External Assessors
    Social Sciences and Humanities Conseil de recherches en Research Council of Canada sciences humaines du Canada Internal use Application for a Grant 899112 Identification This page will be made available to selection committee members and external assessors. Funding opportunity Insight Grants Joint or special initiative Application title Complex Sovereignties: Theories and Practices of Indigenous-Self Determination in Settler States and the International System Applicant family name Applicant given name Initials MacDonald David B Org. code Full name of applicant's organization and department 1350311 University of Guelph Political Science Org. code Full name of administrative organization and department 1350311 University of Guelph College of Social and Applied Human Sciences Preferred Adjudication Committee 435-21 Does your proposal involve Aboriginal Research as defined by SSHRC? Yes No Does your proposal involve human beings as research subjects? If "Yes", consult the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans and submit your proposal to Yes No your organization’s Research Ethics Board. Does any phase of the proposed research or research-related activity: A. Constitute a physical activity carried out on federal lands in Canada, as defined in sub-section 2(1), Yes No in relation to a physical work and that is not a designated project; B. Constitute a physical activity carried out outside of Canada in relation to a physical work and that Yes No is not a designated project; C. (i) Permit a designated project (listed in the CEAA 2012 Regulations Designating Physical Activities Yes No (RDPA)) to be carried out in whole or in part; C.
    [Show full text]