A review of the optical properties of alloys and intermetallics for plasmonics M G Blaber, M D Arnold and M J Ford* Institute for Nanoscale Technology, Department of Physics and Advanced Materials, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia *
[email protected] Abstract. Alternative materials are required to enhance the efficacy of plasmonic devices. We discuss the optical properties of a number of alloys, doped metals, intermetallics, silicides, metallic glasses and high pressure materials. We conclude that due to the probability of low frequency interband transitions, materials with partially occupied d-states perform poorly as plasmonic materials, ruling out many alloys, intermetallics and silicides as viable. The increased probability of electron-electron and electron-phonon scattering rules out many doped and glassy metals. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Plasmonic Materials: Definition and review of metals 2.1 Quality factors and the ideal plasmonic material 2.2 A review of the optical properties of metals 3. Alloys 3.1 Noble metal alloys 3.2 Transition metal alloys 4. Intermetallics 4.1 Alkali metal binary intermetallics 4.2 Noble metal binary intermetallics 4.3 Group 13 binary intermetallics 4.4 Other binary intermetallics 4.5 Ternary Intermetallics 5. Silicides 6. High pressure materials 7. Liquid metals and glassy/amorphous materials 7.1 Liquid Metals 7.2 Metallic Glasses and amorphous alloys 1. Introduction As nanofabrication techniques become increasingly fast and accurate, the performance of plasmonic systems relies less and less on structure fabrication and more on the fundamental limitations of the underlying materials. Plasmonics has seen an exponential growth, due mainly to the sheer diversity of applications, from optical cloaking [1] to superlensing [melville2005, pendry2000] as well as single molecule surface enhanced raman spectroscopy [2], parasite therapy [3] and optical circuits[4] with high speed optical switching[5, 6].