Architectural Periods and Styles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Architectural Periods and Styles II ARCHITECTS IN SCHOOLS CURRICULUM II SECTION 3 3.1 ARCHITECTURAL PERIODS AND STYLES “ In most parts of the West, a child is likely to learn little in school about the geography and history of the region that is shaping him. He gets them through the pores if he gets them at all. Many never get them, some get them late: it is not uncommon for grown men and women to develop a mono- maniac interest in local history that as children they never heard of. The discovery that it has been around them all the time, and they deprived of it, forever shatters their ability to take it for granted as inheritors of a stabler tradition might do.” Wallace Stegner “The Sound of Mountain Water” ACTIVITY CHECKLIST FOR PAGES 3.7-3.168 II ARCHITECTS IN SCHOOLS CURRICULUM II Architectural Periods and Styles 3.2 Section 3 Activities in the seven periods of architecture These activities contain the following Content Standards in The Arts: n AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM • Explain, analyze works of art, applying knowledge of technical, organizational, and aesthetic elements. • Respond to works of art, giving reasons for preferences. n HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES • Relate to works of art from various time periods and cultures. • Describe how historical and cultural contents influence works of art. n CREATE, PRESENT, AND PERFORM • Apply artistic elements and technical skills to create, present and/or perform works of art for a variety of audiences and purposes. • Communicate verbally and in writing about one’s own art work. Description of Activity A variety of activities have been written for each of the architectural periods. As these activities were written in the original documents for this program, they tend to lean more toward the rote style of learning. To utilize these activities for helping students work toward state content standards, teachers could add ideas to the existing materials and activities. For example: the drawing done on page 3.20 could fit the Aesthetics and Art Criticism content standard if the teacher introduced the ideas of line and shape. Content Standards are written using much of the language from Discipline BasedArt Education. On page 1.13, you will find a brief, simplified introduction to those DBAE concepts. Grade 3 and Grade 5 Content Standards in the arts have the expectation that students have an understanding and are able to recognize elements of art appreciation and artistic creation: technical (techniques and tools), aesthetic (line, shape, color, texture, value and space) and organizational (harmony, balance, repetition). The activities presented in this architectural program can enhance students’ understandings of those concepts. ACTIVITY CHECKLIST continued II ARCHITECTS IN SCHOOLS CURRICULUM II Architectural Periods and Styles 3.3 Section 3 Student Opportunities for Connecting to Content Standards in the Arts: 1. Aesthetics and Art Criticism: Given basic information on Aesthetics (shape, space, and line) students will be able to identify a variety of shapes, lines and spaces in their own art work. Older students will be able to identify personal preferenc- es and their relationship to the artistic elements of shape, line, and space. 2. Historical and Cultural Perspectives Given these lessons from the Architectural Periods, the students will be able to identify historical events and conditions that inspired the styles of architecture. Opportunities abound within these activities for making historical and cultural connections to the Content Standards. 3. Create, Present and Perform: Given above lessons, students will be able to communicate verbally and orally about historical, cultural and aesthetic parts of Native Americans’ lives. Many opportunities exist in the activities presented for students to create and present works, either individually or in small groups. Specific Lessons and Their Possible Connections to Content Standards: Following many of the activities presented in these periods of Architecture, are specific Activity Checklists. These checklists will connect the activity to one of the areas of Aesthetics and Art Criticism; Historical and Cultural Perspectives; or Create, Present and Perform. Not all activities lend themselves to these connections. Some of the connections require a minimal amount of teacher input. II ARCHITECTS IN SCHOOLS CURRICULUM II Methods for Introduction of the Materials 3.4 Architectural Periods and Styles In the process of preparing these materials a number of There is a great deal of material to be covered and a methods have been tested. The one suggested here has limited time in which to cover it. This method allows been the most successful. It is surprising how interest- students to learn one portion of the material and then ed the students become in observing buildings in their teach it to the other students by using sketches and an community. They are eager to share information about outline method to aid in telling about it. things they have seen at home or as they traveled This process involves art, history, math, written and about. Parents often comment on things their students verbal communication, and personal growth. have told them about, and some have even asked if they could have copies of the materials. Materials: The materials have been prepared with these things in • Ideally these materials are to be copied and distrib- mind: uted in a packet for each participating student. The 1. Most of the examples of the architectural styles are packets can be kept for use with future classes. If those that students can find in this area. “Archi- making copies of the whole “Student Packet Materi- tecture Oregon Style” (see, “BOOKS, WEBSITES, als” is not possible, make a copy of one of the styles FILMS, VIDEOS AND FIELD TRIPS”), provides a for each student, including both the information source of information and photographs of examples sheet and the full page drawing of the example of of buildings that are found in Oregon. Most other the style. books on architectural styles are focused on the • Cut unlined 8 1/2 X 11-inch sheets of paper into examples found on the East Coast. Every region has fourths. Each student may use several of these for its interpretations, and “way out on the West Coast,” sketches of details. people had their own innovations. • Cut lined paper in half vertically. Have enough for at 2. The examples are the most prevalent styles of each least one piece for each student. period. It should be noted that categorizing architec- tural styles is often controversial among architectur- • Six three by four-foot pieces of butcher paper. Use al historians, so the choice was made to follow the the lighter colors so the writing will show up well. categories as indicated in the source book. Write the name of each period at the top in large letters with the dates. Tape these sheets up around 3. The information has been condensed to give the stu- the room. dents an opportunity to combine reading, writing, drawing and verbal communication in the available • Wide felt pens and masking tape. time. The suggested method for presenting the materials Introduction of the materials: to the students is one example of a successful way of 1. Hand out the materials and give the students a few handling the material. It is hoped teachers and design minutes to look them over. professionals will make innovative adaptations that 2. The design professional or the teacher will make a will fit the individual classroom situation. few comments about the periods shown on the large sheets and explain why these particular styles were chosen. 3. The teacher will explain that each student will be assigned a portion of the materials and will then be responsible for telling the rest of the class about their style. They will want to be prepared to give as much information as possible to the other students in a way that will be easy to understand. II ARCHITECTS IN SCHOOLS CURRICULUM II Methods for Introduction of the Materials 3.5 Architectural Periods and Styles 4. Each student will study his or her style and make Hopefully, these sheets can be left up for the rest of the notes about the information on the lined strips of time the program is being implemented, so referenc- paper. The sections on roofs, shape and size, etc., es can be made as the students make more drawings should be used as the framework for the outlining. A and view additional materials. These might include few notes from the information at the bottom of the personal family dates, local or world historical events, sheet should also be included. current events that make historic reference, etc. 5. On the unlined paper, the students will make sketches of two or three of the details illustrated on How to do the illustrations: the sheet. The full sheet drawings will not be used After the class has done the reading, sketching and at this time except as a reference – the labels on the presentations of the materials, they are ready to make drawings will help by illustrating vocabulary words sketches from the full sheet illustrations of each style. they may not understand. Either have them continue with the style they have The design professional and teacher will circulate been assigned or reassign them so each student can among the students and help them with the project. read another description page and then do the illustra- tion. Give the students a 15-minute and then a five minute warning before the preparation time is up. Have the student put the illustration up on the wall in a location where it will be comfortable to observe Making the presentations: while doing the drawing. Making the drawing by looking at the illustration from some distance simu- The design professional or the teacher will call atten- lates the conditions they will encounter when going on tion to the large sheets of paper taped up in the front sketching walks.
Recommended publications
  • State of the River 2006-07
    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Century Modern Architecture of Norwich
    COVID-19 Response Following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local public health authorities, park operations continue to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining public access, particularly outdoor spaces. Before visiting a park, please check the park website to determine its operating status. Updates about the overall NPS response to COVID-19, including safety information, are posted on www.nps.gov/coronavirus. Please recreate responsibly. National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Weekly List 20200925 KEY: State, County, Property Name, Address/Boundary, City, Vicinity, Reference Number, NHL, Action, Date, Multiple Name ALASKA, MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, Wasilla Depot, Parks Hwy. and Knik Rd., Wasilla, MV77000218, PROPOSED MOVE APPROVED, 9/21/2020 ARKANSAS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, Woolsey Farmstead Cemetery, 535 South Broyles Rd., Fayetteville, SG100005595, LISTED, 9/21/2020 CONNECTICUT, NEW HAVEN COUNTY, Pinto, William, House, 275 Orange St., New Haven, MV85002316, PROPOSED MOVE APPROVED, 9/21/2020 IOWA, BENTON COUNTY, Preston’s Station Historic District, 402 4th Ave., Belle Plaine, SG100005572, LISTED, 9/21/2020 IOWA, GRUNDY COUNTY, Grundy Center High School, 1001 8th St., Grundy Center, SG100005565, LISTED, 9/18/2020 IOWA, MUSCATINE COUNTY, Ijem Avenue Commercial Historic District, Ijem Ave. between Railroad St. and Main St., Nichols, SG100005566, LISTED, 9/18/2020 IOWA, POLK COUNTY, Acadian Manor Historic District, 2801- 2815 Grand Ave., Des Moines, SG100005567, LISTED, 9/18/2020 IOWA, POLK COUNTY, Argonne Building, 1723 Grand Ave. (1723-1733 Grand Ave., plus 515 18th St.), Des Moines, SG100005608, LISTED, 9/24/2020 IOWA, SCOTT COUNTY, Davenport Downtown Commercial Historic District, 2nd St.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Events in Portland Planning History: Pioneer Courthouse Square
    Portland State University PDXScholar Ernie Bonner Collection Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 4-11-2004 Major Events in Portland Planning History: Pioneer Courthouse Square Ernest Bonner Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_bonner Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bonner, Ernest, "Major Events in Portland Planning History: Pioneer Courthouse Square" (2004). Ernie Bonner Collection. 302. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_bonner/302 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ernie Bonner Collection by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Major Events in Portland Planning History: Pioneer Courthouse Square personal files] 1980-08-22 PDC Organizational Meeting. Items discussed include: - It will take $100-200,000 for fund raising and events; - Architect will do sketch on painting the square; - Architect to provide outline of items to be donated. PDC has budgeted $50,000 for interim use related items, i.e., painting the square; - Mike Cook wants proposal from Architect on fee and product on the various phases of work, street right of way not in main contract. Will Martin notes to file [in Mark Bevins personal files] 1980-08-25 Meeting with Bob Packard (Zimmer Gunsul Frasca) on Light Rail Transit station planning. First fee breakdown by M. Bevins and J. Matteson. 1980-08-27 Meeting on street improvements. Architect asked to break down improvements into phasing for grant proposal, also must determine street profile at interface with Square.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL NOMINATION of the Mission Hills Branch Public Library 925 West Washington Street ~ Mission Hills Neighborhood San Diego, California
    HISTORICAL NOMINATION of the Mission Hills Branch Public Library 925 West Washington Street ~ Mission Hills Neighborhood San Diego, California Ronald V. May, RPA Kiley Wallace Legacy 106, Inc. P.O. Box 15967 San Diego, CA 92175 (858) 459-0326 (760) 704-7373 www.legacy106.com June 2019 Ronald V. May, RPA Kiley Wallace Legacy 106, Inc. P.O. Box 15967 San Diego, CA 92175 (858) 459-0326 (760) 704-7373 www.legacy106.com August 2019 1 HISTORIC HOUSE RESEARCH Ronald V. May, RPA, President and Principal Investigator Kiley Wallace, Vice President and Architectural Historian P.O. Box 15967 • San Diego, CA 92175 Phone (858) 459-0326 • (760) 704-7373 http://www.legacy106.com 2 3 State of California – The Resources Agency Primary # ___________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ______________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial __________________________________ NRHP Status Code 3S Other Listings ___________________________________________________________ Review Code _____ Reviewer ____________________________ Date __________ Page 3 of 24 *Resource Name or #: The Mission Hills Branch Public Library P1. Other Identifier: 925 West Washington St., San Diego, CA 92103 *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: San Diego and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Point Loma Date: 2015 T ; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 925 West Washington St. City: San Diego Zip: 92103 d. UTM: Zone: 11 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc.) Elevation: 380 feet Legal Description: It is Tax Assessor’s Parcel (APN) # 444-611-03-00.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Architectural and Historical Intensive Survey Report of Residential Properties Phase 2 By Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA & Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 Project Director Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Sponsoring Agency Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019-2020 Acknowledgments This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office of the Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Park-Above-Parking Downtown: a Spatial-Based Impact Investigation
    PARK-ABOVE-PARKING DOWNTOWN: A SPATIAL-BASED IMPACT INVESTIGATION by LANBIN REN A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Landscape Architecture and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Lanbin Ren Title: Park-above-Parking Downtown: A Spatial-Based Impact Investigation This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Landscape Architecture by: Mark Gillem Chairperson Deni Ruggeri Member Robert Ribe Member Yizhao Yang Outside Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research & Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded December 2012 ii © 2012 Lanbin Ren iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Lanbin Ren Doctor of Philosophy Department of Landscape Architecture December 2012 Title: Park-above-Parking Downtown: A Spatial-Based Impact Investigation Parking and parks are both crucial to downtown economic development. Many studies have shown that downtown parks significantly contribute to increasing surrounding property values and attract residents, businesses and investment. Meanwhile, sufficient available parking promotes accessibility to downtown that also contributes to increasing tax revenue for local government. However, both downtown parks and parking raise problems. Many downtown parks have become places for drug dealing, shooting and vandalism since the decline of downtowns in the 1960s. At the same time, residents and visitors alike oftentimes complain about the lack of parking while in fact parking spaces occupy a large amount of land in downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. X New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Mid-Century Modern Residential Architecture in Norwich, Vermont B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. Residential Architecture in Norwich, Vermont, 1945-1975 II. Architects Working in Norwich, Vermont, 1945-1975 C. Form Prepared by: name/title Lyssa Papazian & Brian Knight, Historic Preservation Consultants organization Lyssa Papazian Historic Preservation Consultant street & number 13 Dusty Ridge Road city or town Putney state Vermont zip code 05346 e-mail [email protected] telephone (802) 579-3698 date 6/20/19 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclid Avenue Historic District
    EUCLID AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT AERIAL & MAP OF The Euclid Avenue Historic District contains the portion of the Avenue which is north of G and south of the I-10. All properties which front Euclid Avenue in this portion have been included within the Historic District boundaries. HISTORY Euclid Avenue was designed and laid out in 1882 by EUCLID AVENUE MEDIAN IS LISTED ON THE George & William Chaffey to be the backbone and NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES centerpiece for the “Model Irrigation Colony”. The brothers designed the avenue to be a thing of functionality and lasting beauty. Euclid Avenue had provisions for an electric railway, water rights for each landowner, electric lights, and long distance telephone lines, and a local educational institution. All of these components were integral to the growth and development that occurred along the avenue. The avenue was designed to run from San Antonio Heights at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains at the north end of the colony to the southern edge of the colony at the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Construction of the avenue began that same year under the Chaffey brother’s direct supervision and, by 1884, four miles of the avenue had been graded. The median was landscaped with Palm trees and faster growing Pepper trees. The curbs and streets were made of granite cobblestone. The cobblestone streets have been paved over with asphalt several times over the years and are no longer visible. In 1886, the Chaffey’s sold their interest in Ontario to Charles Frankish who then formed the Ontario Land and Improvement Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer Courthouse Square Market Research Results
    Portland State University PDXScholar Portland City Archives Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 1-1-1984 Pioneer Courthouse Square Market Research Results Keith L. Crawford Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityarchives Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Crawford, Keith L., "Pioneer Courthouse Square Market Research Results" (1984). Portland City Archives. 97. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityarchives/97 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Portland City Archives by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. PIONEER COURTHOUSE SQUARE MARKET RESEARCH SURVEY RESULTS Conducted in cooperation with Portland State University Under the auspices of Pioneer Courthouse Square of Portland, Inc By Keith L. Crawford Copyright 1984, all rights reserved. PIONEER COURTHOUSE SQUARE MARKET RESEARCH SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Acknowledgements i Introduction ii The reason and the method • iii SURVEY RESULTS: All about the Brickowners Where they live 1 Their relatives before 1900 2 Their ancestors who attended Central School 3 The Portland Hotel Their stories about the Portland Hotel 4 The Meier & Frank parking lot - 5 When they visit downtown When they got involved with the Square How they heard about the fundraising 6 Most effective
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS
    Intensive Level Historic Resources Survey Town of Clarence 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS CBCA PN 05-012A May 2009 Intensive Level Historic Resources Survey Town of Clarence 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS This section provides a brief academic description and generalized viewing context for architectural styles and forms found to be represented in the Town of Clarence. 4.1 Residential Architectural Styles and Forms: 4.1.1 Colonial Houses (1600-1820) 1 The early colonists of America brought with them the prevailing architectural styles and building practices of their native lands. In the early 1700s, the English colonists of the successful eastern seaboard colonies imported from their mother country the Renaissance-inspired Georgian style, which was quickly adopted and adapted. Nearly a century later, this then-dominant style was replaced by the related Adam style. Both styles are marked by a simple box-like plan, strict symmetry and distinct, even ornamentation emphasizing the entrances and fenestration. Figure 20. – Rice Sinclair House, Main Street Local Historic Designated Landmark Remaining, original examples of Colonial homes are relatively rare. Much more common are later “revivals.” It is often difficult to distinguish these “revivals” from the originals. Two points may be help in this determination: the location, as each Colonial style was built in a rather limited area of the country; and a significant element of hand-crafting evident in the construction and detailing of the dwelling, as Colonials were built before the era of industrialization. Based on dates, location, and local history, the Town of Clarence may have a small handful of remaining Colonial houses of later Adam influenced styling, albeit with later period adaptation and modification; further investigation will yield conclusive determination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portland Building Assessment
    The Portland Building Building Systems and Interior Assessment April 2015 Contract #30002867 FFA Architecture and Interiors, Inc. | 520 SW Yamhill Suite 900 Portland OR 97204 | T 503.222.1661 F 503.222.1701 | www.ffadesign.com Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 32 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 34 Design Concept ................................................................................................................................... 34 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................ 38 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 46 Building Interior Description ........................................................................................................ 50 Condition Assessment ................................................................................................................. 54 MEP Condition Assessment
    [Show full text]