The Portland Building Reconstruction Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE PORTLAND BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PHASE 1 REPORT DECEMBER 2, 2016 / PHASE 1 DELIVERABLES Table of Contents 2 DBR Project Team 4 Executive Summary 5 Basis of Design Narrative 16 Basis of Design Drawings (Refer to separate package) Conceptual Budget 35 Project Master Schedule 36 Space Program 38 Sustainability Targets & Plans 57 Constructability, Phasing & Logistics Plan 62 Project Risk Matrix 64 Code & Regulatory Requirements 66 TABLE OF CONTENTS /CITY OF PORTLAND / HOWARD S. WRIGHT / DLR Group 2 /THE PORTLAND BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT / DRAWINGS GENERAL STRUCTURAL 0.0 Cover Sheet S1.0 Floor Plan, Basement S1.1 Floor Plan, First Level S1.2 Floor Plan, Second Level S1.3 Floor Plan, Third Level ARCHITECTURAL S1.4 Floor Plan, Typical Level (4th - 14th) A1.0 Floor Plan, Basement S1.15 Floor Plan, Fifteenth Level A1.1 Floor Plan, First Level S1.16 Floor Plan, Machine Room A1.2 Floor Plan, Second Level A1.3 Floor Plan, Third Level S2.0 Details A1.4 Floor Plan, Fourth Level A1.5 Floor Plan, Typ. Level (5-14) A1.15 Floor Plan, Fifteenth Level A1.16 Floor Plan, Penthouse & Roof MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING MEP1.0 Floor Plan, Basement A3.0 Reflected Ceiling Plan, Basement MEP1.1 Floor Plan, First Level A3.1 Reflected Ceiling Plan, First Level MEP1.2 Floor Plan, Second Level A3.2 Reflected Ceiling Plan, Second Level MEP1.3 Floor Plan, Third Level A3.3 Reflected Ceiling Plan, Third Level MEP1.4 Floor Plan, Typical Level (4th - 14th) A3.4 Reflected Ceiling Plan, Fourth Level MEP1.5 Floor Plan, Typical Level (4th - 14th) - A3.5 Reflected Ceiling Plan, Typ. Level (5-14) Chilled Beam Layout A3.15 Reflected Ceiling Plan, 15th Level MEP1.15 Floor Plan, Fifteenth Level MEP1.16 Floor Plan, Machine Room A4.0 Roof Plan, Overall A5.1 Building Elevation, Main St A5.2 Building Elevation, 4th Ave A5.3 Building Elevation, Madison St A5.4 Building Elevation, 5th Ave A5.5 Building Elevations A6.1 Building Section, Overall North-South A6.2 Building Section, Overall East-West A10.1 Building Details TABLE OF CONTENTS Dec 2, 2016 / PHASE 1 REPORT / 3 DBR Team Specialty Consultants General Contractor Howard S. Wright Architectural Carleton Hart Architecture Architect DLR Group Architectural Convergence Architecture Structural Engineer KPFF Consulting Engineers Brokerage / Transition Planning JLL Mechanical Engineer PAE Engineers Building Envelope Facade Forensics Electrical Engineer PAE Engineers Code Pielow Consulting Electrical Samata Consulting Engineers Environmental Graphics Mayer/Reed Trade Partners Geotech GeoDesign Building Envelope Benson Industries Historic Preservation Architectural Resources Group Electrical On Electric Group Historic Preservation Venerable Group Mechanical General Sheet Metal Interior Design DLR Group Mechanical TCM Corp Interiors Czopek Design Studio Lighting Little Fish Mechanical Whole Building Solutions Mentor Protégé Services Donaldson Enterprises Security Securadyne Structural ABE Design Structural James G. Pierson Sustainability Brightworks Sustainability Eggleston Consulting Group Technology RLF Enterprises DESIGN-BUILD-RELOCATE (DBR) TEAM /CITY OF PORTLAND / HOWARD S. WRIGHT / DLR Group 4 /THE PORTLAND BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dec 2, 2016 / PHASE 1 REPORT / 5 PROJECT BACKGROUND On behalf of Howard S. Wright and DLR Group, we are pleased to submit for your consideration The Portland Building, designed by Michael Graves and built In July, 2016, the City of Portland engaged the design-build in 1982 as administrative offices for the City of Portland, team of Howard S. Wright & DLR Group (DBR team) to the attached Basis of Design package which summarizes the DBR team’s efforts for this Phase 1 is an award winning design of Post Modern architecture. perform a “reconstruction” of the existing Portland Building Concept/ Criteria Design phase of work. The building was later placed on the National Register of to holistically address the building’s issues by designing Historic Places as a building of “exceptional importance,” and constructing a building renovation that would meet the but it currently faces problems with its structure, exterior, City’s requirements for the Project. The City chose to use and operational systems that repairs alone cannot address. a progressive design-build delivery model for the project To protect and preserve this major public investment, the including a Collaborative Project Delivery (CPD) method City has initiated a $195 million project to reconstruct the that brings the City and the DBR team into the design and Portland Building by the end of 2020. The City will create construction process in a way that makes best use of each an adaptable building that will last another 50-100 years, member’s unique knowledge and skill sets to increase value, providing a productive work environment for employees and reduce waste and maximize efficiency. a welcoming space for community members. The DBR team in collaboration with City staff and the Owner’s The Project scope includes envelope repair/replacement, Representative, Day CPM has completed Phase 1 of the seismic upgrades, system replacements, interior remodel, project. This report documents the important outcomes and and relocation services to accommodate the construction recommendations that were developed during the Phase 1 work. The Portland Building is a 15-story high-rise building – Validation, Conceptualization, and Criteria Design scope of that is occupied primarily by City bureaus and is located at work. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oregon. The building is approximately 360,000 SF plus basement. In addition to the repair and replacement scope of work outlined above, the City outlined the following goals for the Project: • The Project will seek, at a minimum, LEED™ Gold certification • The Project should maintain its historic elements and character and should seek to ensure the Portland Building’s place in Portland’s history, • The Project should result in a significantly improved efficiency and functionality of the building as a workplace, • The Project should result in reduced maintenance and operational costs for the Portland Building. • The Project should utilize comprehensive strategies to support and contract with Disadvantaged, Minority-Owned, Women-Owned, and Emerging Small Businesses (“DMWESB”) and support the hiring of minority and women workforce in the trades. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /CITY OF PORTLAND / HOWARD S. WRIGHT / DLR Group 6 /THE PORTLAND BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PHASE 1 SCOPE OF WORK PHASE 1 PROCESS PHASE 1 TEAM The Phase 1 Validation, Conceptualization, and Criteria Design An important first step in the Collaborative Project Delivery As part of the Project Phase 1 process, the DBR team, scope of work served to validate and refine the project scope, (CPD) process was implementing a focused partnering with City input, selected specialized design consultants budget and schedule recommendations for the Project—all session that helped strengthen the integrated owner/DBR and key design assist trade partners to join the team. while staying within the project constraints of $195 million team. This partnering “alignment to purpose” was achieved These consultants and design trade partners developed and completion by the end of 2020. Extensive engagement through Howard S. Wright’s SmartStart® process. Executed recommendations and provided valuable expertise as we with City project staff, City Bureaus, and other stakeholders as part of the project kick-off, this process focused on the validated and developed the outcomes that are documented allowed the team to develop programming and design alignment of the team members in the areas of Behavior, in this report. Please refer to page 4 of this report for a recommendations that were then tested against target Values, Governance, and Milestones. The early partnering complete list of the consultants and trade partners that budget and schedule assumptions. The following key tasks session ensured that the team understood the project participated on the DBR team during this project phase. were performed by the team during this phase: goals and allowed the team to establish a plan for how to effectively work as a group to achieve the goals. The shared • Examined previous feasibility and assessment studies, alignment of goals and vision guided the team in making other City-provided information, and other data to decisions during Phase 1 and will continue to be beneficial COMMUNITY AND STAFF INPUT understand the City’s needs; throughout the remaining phases of the project. • Examined the options previously considered by the City During Phase 1 the project moved along two simultaneous The Project team participated in a number of community and consider applicability to the current project; paths. Along one path, specialized workgroups were and City staff engagement activities during Phase 1 to seek established to focus the team’s expertise on each area of input in the development and design of the project. The • Examined the Project Site and conducted investigations the project scope—building envelope; mechanical/electrical/ community had opportunities to learn about the project and into site conditions and legal and regulatory plumbing; seismic upgrade; workplace/interiors; technology; provide design input in two separate open house activities— requirements for the Project; sustainability and social equity. These workgroups focused one at the Portland Building and one at the Ron Russell • Engaged with City project staff, Bureaus and stakeholders