Operations with Complex Numbers Adding & Subtracting: Combine Like Terms (풂 + 풃풊) + (풄 + 풅풊) = (풂 + 풄) + (풃 + 풅)풊 Examples: 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Operations with Complex Numbers Adding & Subtracting: Combine Like Terms (풂 + 풃풊) + (풄 + 풅풊) = (풂 + 풄) + (풃 + 풅)풊 Examples: 1

Name: __________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Period: _________ Chapter 2: Polynomial and Rational Functions Topic 1: Complex Numbers What is an imaginary number? What is a complex number? The imaginary unit is defined as 풊 = √−ퟏ A complex number is defined as the set of all numbers in the form of 푎 + 푏푖, where 푎 is the real component and 푏 is the coefficient of the imaginary component. An imaginary number is when the real component (푎) is zero. Checkpoint: Since 풊 = √−ퟏ Then 풊ퟐ = Operations with Complex Numbers Adding & Subtracting: Combine like terms (풂 + 풃풊) + (풄 + 풅풊) = (풂 + 풄) + (풃 + 풅)풊 Examples: 1. (5 − 11푖) + (7 + 4푖) 2. (−5 + 7푖) − (−11 − 6푖) 3. (5 − 2푖) + (3 + 3푖) 4. (2 + 6푖) − (12 − 4푖) Multiplying: Just like polynomials, use the distributive property. Then, combine like terms and simplify powers of 푖. Remember! Multiplication does not require like terms. Every term gets distributed to every term. Examples: 1. 4푖(3 − 5푖) 2. (7 − 3푖)(−2 − 5푖) 3. 7푖(2 − 9푖) 4. (5 + 4푖)(6 − 7푖) 5. (3 + 5푖)(3 − 5푖) A note about conjugates: Recall that when multiplying conjugates, the middle terms will cancel out. With complex numbers, this becomes even simpler: (풂 + 풃풊)(풂 − 풃풊) = 풂ퟐ + 풃ퟐ Try again with the shortcut: (3 + 5푖)(3 − 5푖) Dividing: Just like polynomials and rational expressions, the denominator must be a rational number. Since complex numbers include imaginary components, these are not rational numbers. To remove a complex number from the denominator, we multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the Remember! You can simplify first IF factors can be canceled. NO breaking up terms. Examples: 7+4푖 5+4푖 1. 2. 2−5푖 4−2푖 Operations with Square Roots of Negative Numbers Begin by expressing all square roots of negatives in terms of 푖, then proceed with the operation Examples: 1. √−18 − √−8 −14+√−12 2. 2 2 2 3. (−1 + √−5) 4. (−2 + √−3) 5. √−27 + √−48 −25+√−50 6. 15 Quadratic Formula with Complex/Imaginary Solutions Remember that the discriminant of the quadratic formula tells us ABOUT the roots of the equation. (How would the discriminant behave if it were under the square roots in the full quadratic formula?) When the discriminant is negative, it tells us that the quadratic equation has two complex, conjugate roots. Examples: Using the quadratic formula, find the roots of the following 1. 3푥2 − 2푥 + 4 = 0 2. 푥2 − 2푥 + 2 = 0 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Section 3.6 Complex Zeros
210 Chapter 3 Section 3.6 Complex Zeros When finding the zeros of polynomials, at some point you're faced with the problem x 2 −= 1. While there are clearly no real numbers that are solutions to this equation, leaving things there has a certain feel of incompleteness. To address that, we will need utilize the imaginary unit, i. Imaginary Number i The most basic complex number is i, defined to be i = −1 , commonly called an imaginary number . Any real multiple of i is also an imaginary number. Example 1 Simplify − 9 . We can separate − 9 as 9 −1. We can take the square root of 9, and write the square root of -1 as i. − 9 = 9 −1 = 3i A complex number is the sum of a real number and an imaginary number. Complex Number A complex number is a number z = a + bi , where a and b are real numbers a is the real part of the complex number b is the imaginary part of the complex number i = −1 Arithmetic on Complex Numbers Before we dive into the more complicated uses of complex numbers, let’s make sure we remember the basic arithmetic involved. To add or subtract complex numbers, we simply add the like terms, combining the real parts and combining the imaginary parts. 3.6 Complex Zeros 211 Example 3 Add 3 − 4i and 2 + 5i . Adding 3( − i)4 + 2( + i)5 , we add the real parts and the imaginary parts 3 + 2 − 4i + 5i 5 + i Try it Now 1. Subtract 2 + 5i from 3 − 4i .
[Show full text]
How to Show That Various Numbers Either Can Or Cannot Be Constructed Using Only a Straightedge and Compass
How to show that various numbers either can or cannot be constructed using only a straightedge and compass Nick Janetos June 3, 2010 1 Introduction It has been found that a circular area is to the square on a line equal to the quadrant of the circumference, as the area of an equilateral rectangle is to the square on one side... -Indiana House Bill No. 246, 1897 Three problems of classical Greek geometry are to do the following using only a compass and a straightedge: 1. To "square the circle": Given a circle, to construct a square of the same area, 2. To "trisect an angle": Given an angle, to construct another angle 1/3 of the original angle, 3. To "double the cube": Given a cube, to construct a cube with twice the area. Unfortunately, it is not possible to complete any of these tasks until additional tools (such as a marked ruler) are provided. In section 2 we will examine the process of constructing numbers using a compass and straightedge. We will then express constructions in algebraic terms. In section 3 we will derive several results about transcendental numbers. There are two goals: One, to show that the numbers e and π are transcendental, and two, to show that the three classical geometry problems are unsolvable. The two goals, of course, will turn out to be related. 2 Constructions in the plane The discussion in this section comes from [8], with some parts expanded and others removed. The classical Greeks were clear on what constitutes a construction. Given some set of points, new points can be deﬁned at the intersection of lines with other lines, or lines with circles, or circles with circles.
[Show full text]
CHAPTER 8. COMPLEX NUMBERS Why Do We Need Complex Numbers? First of All, a Simple Algebraic Equation Like X2 = −1 May Not Have
CHAPTER 8. COMPLEX NUMBERS Why do we need complex numbers? First of all, a simple algebraic equation like x2 = 1 may not have a real solution. − Introducing complex numbers validates the so called fundamental theorem of algebra: every polynomial with a positive degree has a root. However, the usefulness of complex numbers is much beyond such simple applications. Nowadays, complex numbers and complex functions have been developed into a rich theory called complex analysis and be- come a power tool for answering many extremely difficult questions in mathematics and theoretical physics, and also finds its usefulness in many areas of engineering and com- munication technology. For example, a famous result called the prime number theorem, which was conjectured by Gauss in 1849, and defied efforts of many great mathematicians, was finally proven by Hadamard and de la Vallée Poussin in 1896 by using the complex theory developed at that time. A widely quoted statement by Jacques Hadamard says: “The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain”. The basic idea for complex numbers is to introduce a symbol i, called the imaginary unit, which satisfies i2 = 1. − In doing so, x2 = 1 turns out to have a solution, namely x = i; (actually, there − is another solution, namely x = i). We remark that, sometimes in the mathematical − literature, for convenience or merely following tradition, an incorrect expression with correct understanding is used, such as writing √ 1 for i so that we can reserve the − letter i for other purposes. But we try to avoid incorrect usage as much as possible.
[Show full text]
Lecture 15: Section 2.4 Complex Numbers Imaginary Unit Complex
Lecture 15: Section 2.4 Complex Numbers Imaginary unit Complex numbers Operations with complex numbers Complex conjugate Rationalize the denominator Square roots of negative numbers Complex solutions of quadratic equations L15 - 1 Consider the equation x2 = −1. Def. The imaginary unit, i, is the number such that p i2 = −1 or i = −1 Power of i p i1 = −1 = i i2 = −1 i3 = i4 = i5 = i6 = i7 = i8 = Therefore, every integer power of i can be written as i; −1; −i; 1. In general, divide the exponent by 4 and rewrite: ex. 1) i85 2) (−i)85 3) i100 4) (−i)−18 L15 - 2 Def. Complex numbers are numbers of the form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers. a is the real part and b is the imaginary part of the complex number a + bi. a + bi is called the standard form of a complex number. ex. Write the number −5 as a complex number in standard form. NOTE: The set of real numbers is a subset of the set of complex numbers. If b = 0, the number a + 0i = a is a real number. If a = 0, the number 0 + bi = bi, is called a pure imaginary number. Equality of Complex Numbers a + bi = c + di if and only if L15 - 3 Operations with Complex Numbers Sum: (a + bi) + (c + di) = Diﬀerence: (a + bi) − (c + di) = Multiplication: (a + bi)(c + di) = NOTE: Use the distributive property (FOIL) and remember that i2 = −1. ex. Write in standard form: 1) 3(2 − 5i) − (4 − 6i) 2) (2 + 3i)(4 + 5i) L15 - 4 Complex Conjugates Def.
[Show full text]
Theory of Trigintaduonion Emanation and Origins of Α and Π
Theory of Trigintaduonion Emanation and Origins of and Stephen Winters-Hilt Meta Logos Systems Aurora, Colorado Abstract In this paper a specific form of maximal information propagation is explored, from which the origins of , , and fractal reality are revealed. Introduction The new unification approach described here gives a precise derivation for the mysterious physics constant (the fine-structure constant) from the mathematical physics formalism providing maximal information propagation, with being the maximal perturbation amount. Furthermore, the new unification provides that the structure of the space of initial ‘propagation’ (with initial propagation being referred to as ‘emanation’) has a precise derivation, with a unit-norm perturbative limit that leads to an iterative-map-like computed (a limit that is precisely related to the Feigenbaum bifurcation constant and thus fractal). The computed can also, by a maximal information propagation argument, provide a derivation for the mathematical constant . The ideal constructs of planar geometry, and related such via complex analysis, give methods for calculation of to incredibly high precision (trillions of digits), thereby providing an indirect derivation of to similar precision. Propagation in 10 dimensions (chiral, fermionic) and 26 dimensions (bosonic) is indicated [1-3], in agreement with string theory. Furthermore a preliminary result showing a relation between the Feigenbaum bifurcation constant and , consistent with the hypercomplex algebras indicated in the Emanator Theory, suggest an individual object trajectory with 36=10+26 degrees of freedom (indicative of heterotic strings). The overall (any/all chirality) propagation degrees of freedom, 78, are also in agreement with the number of generators in string gauge symmetries [4].
[Show full text]
Truly Hypercomplex Numbers
TRULY HYPERCOMPLEX NUMBERS: UNIFICATION OF NUMBERS AND VECTORS Redouane BOUHENNACHE (pronounce Redwan Boohennash) Independent Exploration Geophysical Engineer / Geophysicist 14, rue du 1er Novembre, Beni-Guecha Centre, 43019 Wilaya de Mila, Algeria E-mail: [email protected] First written: 21 July 2014 Revised: 17 May 2015 Abstract Since the beginning of the quest of hypercomplex numbers in the late eighteenth century, many hypercomplex number systems have been proposed but none of them succeeded in extending the concept of complex numbers to higher dimensions. This paper provides a definitive solution to this problem by defining the truly hypercomplex numbers of dimension N ≥ 3. The secret lies in the definition of the multiplicative law and its properties. This law is based on spherical and hyperspherical coordinates. These numbers which I call spherical and hyperspherical hypercomplex numbers define Abelian groups over addition and multiplication. Nevertheless, the multiplicative law generally does not distribute over addition, thus the set of these numbers equipped with addition and multiplication does not form a mathematical field. However, such numbers are expected to have a tremendous utility in mathematics and in science in general. Keywords Hypercomplex numbers; Spherical; Hyperspherical; Unification of numbers and vectors Note This paper (or say preprint or e-print) has been submitted, under the title “Spherical and Hyperspherical Hypercomplex Numbers: Merging Numbers and Vectors into Just One Mathematical Entity”, to the following journals: Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences on 08 August 2014, Hypercomplex Numbers in Geometry and Physics (HNGP) on 13 August 2014 and has been accepted for publication on 29 April 2015 in issue No.
[Show full text]
Chapter I, the Real and Complex Number Systems
CHAPTER I THE REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBERS 1, i; AND p2 In order to make precise sense out of the concepts we study in mathematical analysis, we must first come to terms with what the \real numbers" are. Everything in mathematical analysis is based on these numbers, and their very definition and existence is quite deep. We will, in fact, not attempt to demonstrate (prove) the existence of the real numbers in the body of this text, but will content ourselves with a careful delineation of their properties, referring the interested reader to an appendix for the existence and uniqueness proofs. Although people may always have had an intuitive idea of what these real num- bers were, it was not until the nineteenth century that mathematically precise definitions were given. The history of how mathematicians came to realize the necessity for such precision in their definitions is fascinating from a philosophical point of view as much as from a mathematical one. However, we will not pursue the philosophical aspects of the subject in this book, but will be content to con- centrate our attention just on the mathematical facts. These precise definitions are quite complicated, but the powerful possibilities within mathematical analysis rely heavily on this precision, so we must pursue them. Toward our primary goals, we will in this chapter give definitions of the symbols (numbers) 1; i; and p2: − The main points of this chapter are the following: (1) The notions of least upper bound (supremum) and greatest lower bound (infimum) of a set of numbers, (2) The definition of the real numbers R; (3) the formula for the sum of a geometric progression (Theorem 1.9), (4) the Binomial Theorem (Theorem 1.10), and (5) the triangle inequality for complex numbers (Theorem 1.15).
[Show full text]
Notes on Complex Numbers
Computer Science C73 Fall 2021 Scarborough Campus University of Toronto Notes on complex numbers This is a brief review of complex numbers, to provide the relevant background that students need to follow the lectures on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Students have previously encountered this material in their linear algebra courses. p • The \imaginary unit" i = −1. This is a quantity which, multiplied by itself, yields −1; i.e., i2 = −1. It is called \imaginary" because no real number has this property. • Standard representation of complex numbers. A complex number has the form z = a + bi, where a and b are real numbers; a is the \real part" of z and b is the \imaginary part" of z. We can think of z as the pair (a; b), and so complex numbers can be mapped to the Cartesian plane. Just as we can geometrically view the set of real numbers as the set of points along a straight line (the \real line"), we can view complex numbers as the set of points on a plane (the \complex plane"). So in a sense complex numbers are a way of \packaging" a pair of real numbers into a single quantity. • Equality between complex numbers. We deﬁne two complex numbers to be equal to each other if and only if they have the same real parts and the same imaginary parts. In other words, if viewed as points on the plane, the two numbers coincide. • Operations on complex numbers. We can perform addition and multiplication on compex num- bers. Let z = a + bi and z0 = a0 + b0i.
[Show full text]
Contents 0 Complex Numbers
Linear Algebra and Dierential Equations (part 0s): Complex Numbers (by Evan Dummit, 2016, v. 2.15) Contents 0 Complex Numbers 1 0.1 Arithmetic with Complex Numbers . 1 0.2 Complex Exponentials, Polar Form, and Euler's Theorem . 2 0 Complex Numbers In this supplementary chapter, we will outline basic properties along with some applications of complex numbers. 0.1 Arithmetic with Complex Numbers • Complex numbers may seem daunting, arbitrary, and strange when rst introduced, but they are (in fact) very useful in mathematics and elsewhere. Plus, they're just neat. • Some History: Complex numbers were rst encountered by mathematicians in the 1500s who were trying to write down general formulas for solving cubic equations (i.e., equations like x3 + x + 1 = 0), in analogy with the well-known formula for the solutions of a quadratic equation. It turned out that their formulas required manipulation of complex numbers, even when the cubics they were solving had three real roots. ◦ It took over 100 years before complex numbers were accepted as something mathematically legitimate: even negative numbers were sometimes suspect, so (as the reader may imagine) their square roots were even more questionable. ◦ The stigma is still evident even today in the terminology (imaginary numbers), and the fact that complex numbers are often glossed over or ignored in mathematics courses. ◦ Nonetheless, they are very real objects (no pun intended), and have a wide range of uses in mathematics, physics, and engineering. ◦ Among neat applications of complex numbers are deriving trigonometric identities with much less work (see later) and evaluating certain kinds of denite and indenite integrals.
[Show full text]
Meta-Complex Numbers Dual Numbers
Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews Complex Numbers Meta-Complex Numbers Dual Numbers Split- Complex Robert Andrews Numbers Visualizing Four- Dimensional Surfaces October 29, 2014 Table of Contents Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews 1 Complex Numbers Complex Numbers Dual Numbers 2 Dual Numbers Split- Complex Numbers 3 Split-Complex Numbers Visualizing Four- Dimensional Surfaces 4 Visualizing Four-Dimensional Surfaces Table of Contents Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews 1 Complex Numbers Complex Numbers Dual Numbers 2 Dual Numbers Split- Complex Numbers 3 Split-Complex Numbers Visualizing Four- Dimensional Surfaces 4 Visualizing Four-Dimensional Surfaces Quadratic Equations Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews Recall that the roots of a quadratic equation Complex Numbers 2 Dual ax + bx + c = 0 Numbers Split- are given by the quadratic formula Complex Numbers p 2 Visualizing −b ± b − 4ac Four- x = Dimensional 2a Surfaces The quadratic formula gives the roots of this equation as p x = ± −1 This is a problem! There aren't any real numbers whose square is negative! Quadratic Equations Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews What if we wanted to solve the equation Complex Numbers x2 + 1 = 0? Dual Numbers Split- Complex Numbers Visualizing Four- Dimensional Surfaces This is a problem! There aren't any real numbers whose square is negative! Quadratic Equations Meta- Complex Numbers Robert Andrews What if we wanted to solve the equation Complex Numbers x2 + 1 = 0? Dual Numbers The quadratic formula gives the roots of this equation as Split-
[Show full text]
Doing Physics with Quaternions
Doing Physics with Quaternions Douglas B. Sweetser ©2005 doug <[email protected]> All righs reserved. 1 INDEX Introduction 2 What are Quaternions? 3 Unifying Two Views of Events 4 A Brief History of Quaternions Mathematics 6 Multiplying Quaternions the Easy Way 7 Scalars, Vectors, Tensors and All That 11 Inner and Outer Products of Quaternions 13 Quaternion Analysis 23 Topological Properties of Quaternions 28 Quaternion Algebra Tool Set Classical Mechanics 32 Newton’s Second Law 35 Oscillators and Waves 37 Four Tests of for a Conservative Force Special Relativity 40 Rotations and Dilations Create the Lorentz Group 43 An Alternative Algebra for Lorentz Boosts Electromagnetism 48 Classical Electrodynamics 51 Electromagnetic Field Gauges 53 The Maxwell Equations in the Light Gauge: QED? 56 The Lorentz Force 58 The Stress Tensor of the Electromagnetic Field Quantum Mechanics 62 A Complete Inner Product Space with Dirac’s Bracket Notation 67 Multiplying quaternions in Polar Coordinate Form 69 Commutators and the Uncertainty Principle 74 Unifying the Representations of Integral and Half−Integral Spin 79 Deriving A Quaternion Analog to the Schrödinger Equation 83 Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 86 Time Reversal Transformations for Intervals Gravity 89 Unified Field Theory by Analogy 101 Einstein’s vision I: Classical unified field equations for gravity and electromagnetism using Riemannian quaternions 115 Einstein’s vision II: A unified force equation with constant velocity profile solutions 123 Strings and Quantum Gravity 127 Answering Prima Facie Questions in Quantum Gravity Using Quaternions 134 Length in Curved Spacetime 136 A New Idea for Metrics 138 The Gravitational Redshift 140 A Brief Summary of Important Laws in Physics Written as Quaternions 155 Conclusions 2 What Are Quaternions? Quaternions are numbers like the real numbers: they can be added, subtracted, multiplied, and divided.
[Show full text]
List of Mathematical Symbols by Subject from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
List of mathematical symbols by subject From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This list of mathematical symbols by subject shows a selection of the most common symbols that are used in modern mathematical notation within formulas, grouped by mathematical topic. As it is virtually impossible to list all the symbols ever used in mathematics, only those symbols which occur often in mathematics or mathematics education are included. Many of the characters are standardized, for example in DIN 1302 General mathematical symbols or DIN EN ISO 80000-2 Quantities and units – Part 2: Mathematical signs for science and technology. The following list is largely limited to non-alphanumeric characters. It is divided by areas of mathematics and grouped within sub-regions. Some symbols have a different meaning depending on the context and appear accordingly several times in the list. Further information on the symbols and their meaning can be found in the respective linked articles. Contents 1 Guide 2 Set theory 2.1 Definition symbols 2.2 Set construction 2.3 Set operations 2.4 Set relations 2.5 Number sets 2.6 Cardinality 3 Arithmetic 3.1 Arithmetic operators 3.2 Equality signs 3.3 Comparison 3.4 Divisibility 3.5 Intervals 3.6 Elementary functions 3.7 Complex numbers 3.8 Mathematical constants 4 Calculus 4.1 Sequences and series 4.2 Functions 4.3 Limits 4.4 Asymptotic behaviour 4.5 Differential calculus 4.6 Integral calculus 4.7 Vector calculus 4.8 Topology 4.9 Functional analysis 5 Linear algebra and geometry 5.1 Elementary geometry 5.2 Vectors and matrices 5.3 Vector calculus 5.4 Matrix calculus 5.5 Vector spaces 6 Algebra 6.1 Relations 6.2 Group theory 6.3 Field theory 6.4 Ring theory 7 Combinatorics 8 Stochastics 8.1 Probability theory 8.2 Statistics 9 Logic 9.1 Operators 9.2 Quantifiers 9.3 Deduction symbols 10 See also 11 References 12 External links Guide The following information is provided for each mathematical symbol: Symbol: The symbol as it is represented by LaTeX.
[Show full text]