DOCSLIB.ORG

Documento 70,3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Documento 70,3 CATÁLOGO DE LOS COLEÓPTEROS DEL PARQUE NATURAL DEL CADÍ-MOIXERÓ 1 2 AMADOR VIÑOLAS ET AL. COLEOPTEROLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS © Asociación Europea de Coleopterología ISSN: 2339-7799 (online edition) Legal Register: B-46.598-1998 Published by the Asociación Europea de Coleopterología Publication date: October 2014 Graphic design by Jesús del Hoyo Composition: Amador Viñolas CATÁLOGO DE LOS COLEÓPTEROS DEL PARQUE NATURAL DEL CADÍ-MOIXERÓ 3 ÍNDICE Abstract ..........................................................................................................................5 Resumen .........................................................................................................................5 Resum ............................................................................................................................6 Introducción ...................................................................................................................6 Metodología empleada .................................................................................................10 Acrónimos de las colecciones depositarias de los especímenes estudiados ................12 Resultados y Discusión ................................................................................................12 Agradecimientos ..........................................................................................................14 Referencias ...................................................................................................................15 Anexo 1 ........................................................................................................................20 Anexo 2 ........................................................................................................................22 Anexo 3 ........................................................................................................................23 Anexo 4 ........................................................................................................................23 Catálogo de los coleópteros del Parque Natural del Cadí-Moixeró .............................25 Gyrinidae ............................................................................................................25 Carabidae ...........................................................................................................25 Haliplidae ...........................................................................................................35 Dytiscidae ..........................................................................................................35 Hydrophilidae ....................................................................................................37 Histeridae ...........................................................................................................38 Hydraenidae .......................................................................................................40 Ptiliidae ..............................................................................................................40 Leiodidae ............................................................................................................41 Silphidae ............................................................................................................42 Staphylinidae ......................................................................................................43 Geotrupidae ........................................................................................................48 Trogidae .............................................................................................................49 Lucanidae ...........................................................................................................49 Scarabaeidae ......................................................................................................49 Scirtidae .............................................................................................................56 Buprestidae ........................................................................................................56 Byrrhidae ............................................................................................................60 Elmidae ..............................................................................................................60 Dryopidae ...........................................................................................................61 Eucnemidae ........................................................................................................61 Elateridae ...........................................................................................................61 Drilidae ..............................................................................................................65 Lycidae ...............................................................................................................66 Lampyridae ........................................................................................................66 4 AMADOR VIÑOLAS ET AL. Cantharidae ........................................................................................................66 Dermestidae .......................................................................................................68 Bostrichidae .......................................................................................................69 Ptinidae ..............................................................................................................69 Trogossitidae ......................................................................................................71 Cleridae ..............................................................................................................71 Melyridae ...........................................................................................................72 Byturidae ............................................................................................................74 Biphyllidae .........................................................................................................74 Sphindidae ..........................................................................................................74 Monotomidae .....................................................................................................74 Cryptophagidae ..................................................................................................74 Silvanidae ...........................................................................................................75 Cucujidae ...........................................................................................................75 Kateretidae .........................................................................................................75 Nitidulidae ..........................................................................................................75 Cerylonidae ........................................................................................................76 Endomychidae ....................................................................................................76 Coccinellidae ......................................................................................................77 Latridiidae ..........................................................................................................79 Mycetophagidae .................................................................................................79 Ciidae .................................................................................................................80 Melandryidae .....................................................................................................80 Mordellidae ........................................................................................................80 Zopheridae .........................................................................................................81 Tenebrionidae .....................................................................................................81 Oedemeridae ......................................................................................................84 Meloidae ............................................................................................................85 Mycteridae .........................................................................................................86 Pythidae ..............................................................................................................86 Pyrochroidae ......................................................................................................86 Salpingidae .........................................................................................................86 Anthicidae ..........................................................................................................87 Scraptiidae ..........................................................................................................87 Vesperidae ..........................................................................................................88 Cerambycidae ....................................................................................................88 Chrysomelidae .................................................................................................101
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Trichoferus Arenbergeri with Description of Male (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)
    Fragmenta entomologica, Roma, 40 (1): 105-114 (2008) NOTES ON TRICHOFERUS ARENBERGERI WITH DESCRIPTION OF MALE (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) ALESSANDRO B. BISCACCIANTI (*) and DANIELE SECHI (**) Trichoferus arenbergeri Holzschuh, 1995 was described from Sar- dinia based upon three females collected in the following localities: “2 km westl, Siniscola [NU], Monte Albo” (locus typicus), “Siniscola (Nuoro)” and “Ozieri” [SS] (Holzschuh 1995: 15). The male of this taxon is still unknown, as well as its biology, ecology and preimaginal stages. During several surveys carried out from 2002 to 2007 at differ- ent sites in southern Sardinia, several specimens (larvae, pupae and adults of both sexes) of this poorly known longhorn beetle were col- lected and observed. The aim of this paper is to describe the male morphology, the biology and the habitat of the species, with a discus- sion about its relationship to other congeneric species. Larval and pu- pal morphology will be treated in a further contribution (Biscaccianti & Di Giulio unpublished data). Specimens examined are listed from North to South and from East to West; they are preserved in the collections listed below. Measures of specimens are taken in the following way. Total length: from the forehead to the apex of elytra; elytral length: from humerus to elytral apex; elytral width: maximum width at humeri; tarsal joint length: from the base of joint (excluding articulation) to the apical margin, or to the midpoint of a line tangential to the apex of the lobes (for bilobed joints); tarsal joint width: maximum width. Nomenclature of associated beetle-fauna follows Liberti (2007), plant nomenclature follows Conti et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Environmental Changes Led To
    Kergoat et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2014, 14:220 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/220 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Cretaceous environmental changes led to high extinction rates in a hyperdiverse beetle family Gael J Kergoat1*, Patrice Bouchard2, Anne-Laure Clamens1, Jessica L Abbate3, Hervé Jourdan4, Roula Jabbour-Zahab3, Gwenaelle Genson1, Laurent Soldati1 and Fabien L Condamine5 Abstract Background: As attested by the fossil record, Cretaceous environmental changes have significantly impacted the diversification dynamics of several groups of organisms. A major biome turnover that occurred during this period was the rise of angiosperms starting ca. 125 million years ago. Though there is evidence that the latter promoted the diversification of phytophagous insects, the response of other insect groups to Cretaceous environmental changes is still largely unknown. To gain novel insights on this issue, we assess the diversification dynamics of a hyperdiverse family of detritivorous beetles (Tenebrionidae) using molecular dating and diversification analyses. Results: Age estimates reveal an origin after the Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction (older than previously thought), followed by the diversification of major lineages during Pangaean and Gondwanan breakups. Dating analyses indicate that arid-adapted species diversified early, while most of the lineages that are adapted to more humid conditions diversified much later. Contrary to other insect groups, we found no support for a positive shift in diversification rates during the Cretaceous; instead there is evidence for an 8.5-fold increase in extinction rates that was not compensated by a joint increase in speciation rates. Conclusions: We hypothesize that this pattern is better explained by the concomitant reduction of arid environments starting in the mid-Cretaceous, which likely negatively impacted the diversification of arid-adapted species that were predominant at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleópteros Saproxílicos De Los Bosques De Montaña En El Norte De La Comunidad De Madrid
    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid T e s i s D o c t o r a l Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales 2014 Departamento de Producción Vegetal: Botánica y Protección Vegetal Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales Directores: D. Pedro del Estal Padillo, Doctor Ingeniero Agrónomo D. Marcos Méndez Iglesias, Doctor en Biología 2014 Tribunal nombrado por el Magfco. y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid el día de de 2014. Presidente D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Secretario D. Suplente D. Suplente D. Realizada la lectura y defensa de la Tesis el día de de 2014 en Madrid, en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos. Calificación: El Presidente Los Vocales El Secretario AGRADECIMIENTOS A Ángel Quirós, Diego Marín Armijos, Isabel López, Marga López, José Luis Gómez Grande, María José Morales, Alba López, Jorge Martínez Huelves, Miguel Corra, Adriana García, Natalia Rojas, Rafa Castro, Ana Busto, Enrique Gorroño y resto de amigos que puntualmente colaboraron en los trabajos de campo o de gabinete. A la Guardería Forestal de la comarca de Buitrago de Lozoya, por su permanente apoyo logístico. A los especialistas en taxonomía que participaron en la identificación del material recolectado, pues sin su asistencia hubiera sido mucho más difícil finalizar este trabajo.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatorial Corrections for Dasytidae and Malachiidae (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2003 Nomenclatorial corrections for Dasytidae and Malachiidae (Coleoptera) Adriean J. Mayor Great Smoky Mountains National Park Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Mayor, Adriean J., "Nomenclatorial corrections for Dasytidae and Malachiidae (Coleoptera)" (2003). Insecta Mundi. 40. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, March-June, 2003 85 Nomenclatorial corrections for Dasytidae and Malachiidae (Coleoptera) Adriean J. Mayor Great Smoky Mountains National Park 107 Park Headquarters Road, Gatlinburg, TN 37738 Abstract: Nomenclatorial corrections are proposed for 9 cases of homonymy and 5 cases of synonymy in the Dasytidae and Malachiidae. For the homonyms, the following new names are proposed: Aplocnemus montbabor Mayor, new name, for A. baborensis Pic 1922; Dasytes loboensis Mayor, new name, for D. nevadensis Pic 1954; DasytesminorMayor,newname,forD. minutusCasey1895; Amalthocus pici Mayor,newname,forA. metallicus (Pic 1955); Attalus tribandipennis Mayor, new name, for
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Els Coleòpters Del Delta Del Llobregat. Aproximació Històrica I Noves Aportacions
    13. ELS COLEÒPTERS DEL DELTA DEL LLOBREGAT. APROXIMACIÓ HISTÒRICA I NOVES APORTACIONS Miguel Prieto Manzanares1 1. Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. delta-llobregat.indb 407 12/12/2018 16:51:22 408 ELS SISTEMES NATURALS DEL DELTA DEL LLOBREGAT 13.1. INTRODUCCIÓ Els treballs esmentats no es limiten a una llista taxonòmica, sinó que també inclouen El valor natural del delta del Llobregat va ser informació sobre l’hàbitat i la biologia de les reconegut ben aviat pels entomòlegs, que des espècies. Mateu (1947), en particular, ofereix de mitjan segle xix van freqüentar la zona una descripció exhaustiva del territori i el per a la recol·lecció i l’estudi dels coleòpters. seus ecosistemes a propòsit de l’estudi de la La proximitat amb els nuclis metropolitans família dels caràbids (de la qual va citar gai- de les comarques del Baix Llobregat i el Bar- rebé 150 espècies). Amb vocació conserva- celonès, especialment amb la ciutat de Barce- cionista, aquest i altres entomòlegs alerten de lona, va afavorir la presència dels naturalis- la degradació i l’empobriment del Delta cau- tes, atrets per la gran diversitat d’hàbitats, sats pel creixement industrial i la urbanitza- aleshores inalterats o sotmesos a transforma- ció, ja evidents en aquella època (Mateu, cions incipients. El primer catàleg de coleòp- 1947; Español, 1949a; Lagar, 1967a, 1970 i ters de Catalunya (Cuní Martorell i Martorell 1976; Lagar i Lucas, 1981). A partir del anys Peña, 1876) recull, de fet, nombrosos regis- setanta disminueixen els estudis sobre els co- tres de la desembocadura del Llobregat i leòpters de la zona, coincidint amb un nou àrees adjacents, la majoria corresponents a impuls en els plans de desenvolupament, localitats clàssiques de l’hemidelta esquerre.
    [Show full text]
  • 293 315 Nikitskij.P65
    Åâðàçèàòñêèé ýíòîìîë. æóðíàë 4(4): 293315 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2005 Ñèñòåìàòè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê æåñòêîêðûëûõ (Insecta, Coleoptera) Óäìóðòèè Checklist of beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) of Udmurtia Ñ.Â. Äåäþõèí*, Í.Á. Íèêèòñêèé**, Â.Á. Ñåì¸íîâ*** S.V. Dedyukhin*, N.B. Nikitsky**, V.B. Semenov*** * Êàôåäðà ýêîëîãèè æèâîòíûõ, Óäìóðòñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò, óë. Óíèâåðñèòåòñêàÿ 1, Èæåâñê 426034 Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: [email protected]. * Department of animal ecology, Udmurt State University, Universitetskaya str. 1, Izhevsk 426034 Russia. ** Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ èì. Ì.Â. Ëîìîíîñîâà, óë. Áîëüøàÿ Íèêèòñêàÿ 6, Ìîñêâà 125009 Ðîññèÿ. Email: [email protected]. ** Zoological Museum of Moscow Lomonosov State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya 6, Moscow 125009 Russia. *** Èíñòèòóò ìåäèöèíñêîé ïàðàçèòîëîãèè è òðîïè÷åñêîé ìåäèöèíû èì. Å.È. Ìàðöèíîâñêîãî, óë. Ìàëàÿ Ïèðîãîâñêàÿ 20, Ìîñêâà 119435 Ðîññèÿ. *** Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Malaya Pirogovskaya 20, Moscow 119435 Russia. Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: Coleoptera, ôàóíà, Óäìóðòèÿ. Key words: Coleoptera, fauna, Udmurtia. Ðåçþìå. Ïðèâîäèòñÿ ïîëíûé ñïèñîê æåñòêîêðûëûõ óêàçàííûå â ïåðâîì ñïèñêå, çäåñü îòñóòñòâóþò, ÷òî, íàñåêîìûõ (Coleoptera) Óäìóðòèè, ãäå îòìå÷åíî íåìíî- ïî-âèäèìîìó, ãîâîðèò îá èõ îøèáî÷íîì îïðåäåëåíèè. ãèì áîëåå 2400 âèäîâ æóêîâ èç 91 ñåìåéñòâà. Âïåðâûå Ñ íàèáîëüøåé (ïðîïîðöèîíàëüíî îáùåìó ïîòåíöèàëü- äëÿ ðåãèîíà ïðèâåäåíî 1482 âèäà (ïîìå÷åíû â ñïèñêå íîìó ÷èñëó âèäîâ) ïîëíîòîé áûëè èçó÷åíû ñåìåéñòâà: çâåçäî÷êîé *, ñ ïðàâîé ñòîðîíû îò íàçâàíèÿ âèäà). Carabidae (139 âèäîâ), Cerambycidae (58), Scarabae- Abstract. A complete checklist (2400 species in 91 idae (s. l.) (57 âèäîâ), Elateridae (50 âèäîâ), à òàêæå families) of the beetles (Coleoptera) of Udmurtia is provided. Curculionidae (s. l.) (76), Buprestidae (20), Coccinellidae 1482 species are reported from Udmurtia for the first time, (17), äëÿ îñòàëüíûõ ïðèâåäåíû ëèøü îòäåëüíûå ïðåä- as indicated by an asterisk (*) in the list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity of Flying Coleoptera Associated With
    THE BIODIVERSITY OF FLYING COLEOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT OF THE DOUGLAS-FIR BEETLE (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins) IN INTERIOR DOUGLAS-FIR (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco). By Susanna Lynn Carson B. Sc., The University of Victoria, 1994 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming To t(p^-feguired standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 2002 © Susanna Lynn Carson, 2002 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. 1 further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) Abstract Increasing forest management resulting from bark beetle attack in British Columbia's forests has created a need to assess the impact of single species management on local insect biodiversity. In the Fort St James Forest District, in central British Columbia, Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) (Fd) grows at the northern limit of its North American range. At the district level the species is rare (representing 1% of timber stands), and in the early 1990's growing populations of the Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsuage Hopkins) threatened the loss of all mature Douglas-fir habitat in the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Histoires Naturelles N°16 Histoires Naturelles N°16
    Histoires Naturelles n°16 Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Cyrille Deliry - Avril 2011 ! - 1 - Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Les Coléoptères forment l"ordre de plus diversifié de la Faune avec près de 400000 espèces indiquées dans le Monde. On en compte près de 20000 en Europe et pus de 9600 en France. Classification des Coléoptères Lawrence J.F. & Newton A.F. 1995 - Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names) In : Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera. - éd. J.Pakaluk & S.A Slipinski, Varsovie : 779-1006. Ordre Coleoptera Sous-ordre Archostemata - Fam. Ommatidae, Crowsoniellidae, Micromathidae, Cupedidae Sous-ordre Myxophaga - Fam. Lepiceridae, Torridincolidae, Hydroscaphidae, Microsporidae Sous-ordre Adephaga - Fam. Gyrinidae, Halipidae, Trachypachidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Rhysodidae, Carabidae (Carabinae, Cicindelinae, Trechinae...) Sous-ordre Polyphaga Série Staphyliniformia - Superfam. Hydrophyloidea, Staphylinoidea Série Scarabaeiformia - Fam. Lucanidae, Passalidae, Trogidae, Glaresidae, Pleocmidae, Diphyllostomatidae, Geotrupidae, Belohinidae, Ochodaeidae, Ceratocanthidae, Hybrosoridae, Glaphyridae, Scarabaridea (Scarabaeinae, Melolonthinae, Cetoniinae...) Série Elateriformia - Superfam. Scirtoidea, Dascilloidea, Buprestoidea (Buprestidae), Byrrhoidea, Elateroidea (Elateridae, Lampyridae, Cantharidae...) + Incertae sedis - Fam. Podabrocephalidae, Rhinophipidae
    [Show full text]
  • Coleópteros Del Parque Natural De Las Fragas Del Eume
    Coleópteros del Parque Natural de las Fragas del Eume (Galicia, noroeste de la Península Ibérica), II: Scarabaeoidea, Buprestoidea, Byrrhoidea, Elateroidea, Bostrichoidea, Lymexyloidea, Cleroidea, Cucujoidea, Tenebrionoidea, Chrysomeloidea y Curculionoidea ANDRÉS BASELGA y FRANCISCO NOVOA Departamento de Biología Animal. Facultad de Biología. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. 15706 Santiago de Compostela. España. Recibido: 1-VI-2003. Aceptado: 27-I-2004 ISSN: 0210-8984 RESUMEN Se realiza un inventario de 286 especies de Scarabaeoidea, Buprestoidea, Byrrhoidea, Elateroidea, Bostrichoidea, Lymexyloidea, Cleroidea, Cucujoidea, Tenebrionoidea, Chrysomeloidea y Curculionoidea del Parque Natural de las Fragas del Eume (Galicia, noroeste de la Península Ibérica). Destacan especialmente las citas de Aphthona sandrae Baselga y Novoa, 2002 que fue descrita del Parque Natural, así como Chrysobyrrhulus asturiensis Allemand, 1997, Grynobius planus (Fabricius, 1787), Phyllotreta exclamationis (Thunberg, 1784) y Longitarsus fulgens (Foudras, 1860) por ampliar significativamente su distribución. Debido al carácter atlántico del clima y la vegetación, los elementos septentrionales (25,1%) suponen una proporción mucho mayor que los mediterráneos (7,8%). Los endemismos ibéricos son bastan- te abundantes (14,8%) y aparecen numerosas especies típicas de áreas montañosas, datos que indican un alto grado de conservación de esta zona de baja altitud. Palabras clave: Coleoptera, Fragas del Eume, Galicia, Península Ibérica, faunística, biogeografía. ABSTRACT
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Nepal's Insects
    An Inventory of Nepal's Insects Volume III (Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera & Diptera) V. K. Thapa An Inventory of Nepal's Insects Volume III (Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera& Diptera) V.K. Thapa IUCN-The World Conservation Union 2000 Published by: IUCN Nepal Copyright: 2000. IUCN Nepal The role of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) in supporting the IUCN Nepal is gratefully acknowledged. The material in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for education or non-profit uses, without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. IUCN Nepal would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication, which uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purposes without prior written permission of IUCN Nepal. Citation: Thapa, V.K., 2000. An Inventory of Nepal's Insects, Vol. III. IUCN Nepal, Kathmandu, xi + 475 pp. Data Processing and Design: Rabin Shrestha and Kanhaiya L. Shrestha Cover Art: From left to right: Shield bug ( Poecilocoris nepalensis), June beetle (Popilla nasuta) and Ichneumon wasp (Ichneumonidae) respectively. Source: Ms. Astrid Bjornsen, Insects of Nepal's Mid Hills poster, IUCN Nepal. ISBN: 92-9144-049 -3 Available from: IUCN Nepal P.O. Box 3923 Kathmandu, Nepal IUCN Nepal Biodiversity Publication Series aims to publish scientific information on biodiversity wealth of Nepal. Publication will appear as and when information are available and ready to publish. List of publications thus far: Series 1: An Inventory of Nepal's Insects, Vol. I. Series 2: The Rattans of Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota) of the Canary Islands
    VIERAEA Vol. 32 107-115 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, diciembre 2004 ISSN 0210-945X Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota) of the Canary Islands ERIK ARNDT * & SERGI SANTAMARÍA** *Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Department LOEL, Strenzfelder Allee 28, D-06406 Bernburg, Germany. Correspondence address. *Unitat de Botànica, Departament de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia, Facultat de Ciències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193-Bellaterra (Barcelona), SPAIN ARNDT, E. & S. SANTAMARÍA (2004). Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota) de las islas Canarias. VIERAEA 32: 107-115. RESUMEN: Se presenta una lista con 23 especies y 8 géneros de Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota). Seis de ellas son primeras citas para las islas Canarias. La mayoría de las especies citadas infectan Carabidae (Coleoptera). Muchas de las especies de hospedantes (23) son endémicas, siendo sólo nueve las de hospedantes que también se encuentran fuera de la región Macaronésica. Los Carabidae, como familia más diversa de hospedantes, incluyen 21 especies endémicas y 6 de amplia distribución. Las pautas de distribución de Laboulbeniales dependen de dos factores ecológicos (humedad y biodiversidad de los hospedantes) que varían mucho entre las distintas islas. Palabras clave: Laboulbeniales, Carabidae, Staphylinidae, Anthicidae, Blattaria, Ephydridae, islas Canarias. ABSTRACT: The list includes 23 species of Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota) in 8 genera. Six species are new for the Canary Islands. The majority of recorded species infests Carabidae (Coleoptera). Most host species (23) are endemic, only nine hosts also occur outside the Macaronesian region. There are 21 endemic and 6 widespread host species in the Carabidae as most diverse host family. The distribution pattern of Laboulbeniales corresponds with two ecological factors (moisture and host biodiversity respectively) which vary strongly between the different islands.
    [Show full text]