DOCSLIB.ORG

POLICY RE-CATEGORIZATION and INTEGRATION Europeanization Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

POLICY RE-CATEGORIZATION AND INTEGRATION Europeanization of Nordic Alcohol Control Policies Trygve Ugland Dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of doctor rerum politicarum on 10 August 2001 CONTENTS List of Figures……………………………………...……………..…………………………. 6 Acknowledgments………….….……………………………………..……………………… 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION, THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY……………………………………...……..…….….…..…………. 9 1.1 Introduction….…………………………………….….……………………………… 9 1.1.1 Policy integration and disintegration…………..………………...………………… 9 1.1.2 Policy matches and mismatches…………………………..……………………...... 14 1.2 Policy areas as more or less integrated systems……..………………………….… 18 1.2.1 Policy consistency………………………………………..…………………………. 21 1.2.2 Policy interdependence..……….…………………………………………………… 23 1.2.3 Policy and structural connectedness……..……………………………………….. 24 1.3 Implications of variations in patterns and degrees of policy integration….....…. 25 1.3.1 Re-categorization as consequential versus rule-based action……...………...… 28 1.3.2 Policy integration, legitimacy and justification………………….…………….… 32 1.4 Methodology………………………………………………..………………..……… 36 1.4.1 An embedded multiple case study………………………….…………………….... 36 1.4.2 Pattern-matching: A policy re-categorization model………..………...……….... 38 1.4.3 Empirical sources………….……………………………….……………………….. 42 1.4.4 Reflections on the empirical sources………………………….……….………….. 46 1.5 Dissertation structure…………………….……..……………………..…….…...… 48 CHAPTER 2: NORDIC ALCOHOL CONTROL POLICIES AS MORE OR LESS INTEGRATED SYSTEMS……………..……………………………….………..….. 51 2.1 Background……….………….………………………….…….……………….....… 51 2.2 Nordic alcohol control policies and policy consistency……....……………..……. 54 2.2.1 The state alcohol monopoly systems………………………………………..……... 56 2.2.2 Taxation and pricing of alcoholic beverages……………………………..……… 64 2.2.3 Nordic variations in policy consistency……………………………..……………. 66 2.3 Nordic alcohol control policies and policy interdependence….….……………… 68 2.3.1 Nordic variations in policy interdependence………………………..…………… 69 2.4 Nordic alcohol control policies and structural connectedness….……….………. 72 2.4.1 Nordic variations in structural connectedness…………………..………………. 73 2.5 Contrasting patterns and degrees of alcohol control policy integration in Finland, Norway and Sweden…………….…………………………………...….... 82 2.6 History as inefficient: Continuity and change in Nordic alcohol control policies…………………………………………………..…………………………... 84 -3- CHAPTER 3: ALCOHOL, ALCOHOL CONTROL AND THE EU……….……...………...…… 87 3.1 Introduction………………………….………………………………..…………..... 87 3.2 Alcohol and alcohol control in the EU member states…………..……………..... 88 3.2.1 A disintegrated approach towards alcohol control…………..………………….. 88 3.2.2 Economic, cultural and historical aspects in relation to alcohol……….…….... 92 3.3 Alcohol and alcohol control on the EU level………....………………………….... 97 3.3.1 Alcohol control measures on the EU policy agenda…………………………..… 97 3.3.2 Alcohol and the European Court of Justice………………….…...…………….. 100 3.4 Specification of the substantive policy mismatch……...……….……………...... 101 3.5 Policy re-categorization in the area of alcohol control policy.…...………....….. 103 CHAPTER 4: NORDIC ALCOHOL CONTROL POLICIES IN THE MEETING WITH THE EU…….……..……………………………………..………..…… 105 4.1 Introduction……….……………………………………………..…...…………… 105 4.2 EFTA, EU and the Nordic countries…………...…………..……..……………... 107 4.3 The state alcohol monopoly systems.……....………………….....………………. 110 4.3.1 The Nordic version: Instruments of health and social policy……..…………... 110 4.3.2 The EU version: Monopolies of a commercial character………..……………. 113 4.3.3 A partial de-monopolisation: Nordic discord and separate adaptations…..... 115 4.3.4 The monopoly issue on the domestic arenas………………………………..…... 117 4.3.5 Finnish and Swedish exchange of letters with the Commission………..……... 122 4.3.6 Norwegian exchange of letters with the ESA…………………...……..……….. 123 4.3.7 Continuation of the retail monopolies: Towards a new Nordic accord…...…. 127 4.3.8 The Swedish retail monopoly before the ECJ……………………………..……. 128 4.3.9 The Norwegian retail monopoly before the EFTA Court……………..……….. 130 4.4 The high alcohol taxes and prices……….……….………….....……....………… 132 4.4.1 Tax harmonisation within the EU…………………….……………..…………… 133 4.4.2 Establishment of common tax legislation………………………..……………… 133 4.4.3 Free movement of goods…………………………………………..……………… 136 4.4.4 A Nordic derogation in the accession negotiations…….……..…….…...……... 136 4.4.5. Renegotiating the restrictions on travellers’ imports: Nordic discord and separate adaptations…………………………………………..…………………. 141 4.4.6 Cross-border trade in alcohol within the internal market…..…...……………. 144 4.4.7 Cross-border trade in Alcohol with Third Countries..………………………… 145 4.5 The two main pillars of Nordic alcohol control policies in the meeting with the EU………………………………………….…………………… 147 -4- CHAPTER 5: RE-CATEGORIZATION OF NORDIC ALCOHOL CONTROL POLICIES…..…..……………………………………………………….…………...… 149 5.1 Policy integration, justification and adaptation…...……….…………………… 149 5.2 The partial de-monopolisation…………………….……….....……………….…. 150 5.2.1 Finland: Abolition of the “Foreign trade monopolies”…..…………………… 151 5.2.2 Sweden: Striking a compromise with the Commission……..………………….. 153 5.2.3 Norway: Court driven adaptation towards the compromise solution…..……. 154 5.2.4 Discussion: Policy integration and justification………………………..……… 159 5.3 The tax and price instrument under pressure………….……….………………. 167 5.3.1 Discussion: Policy integration and justification……………………..……….... 168 5.4 Policy re-categorization, reconsideration and reinterpretation: A question of appropriate use of policy instruments…………..………………………..……… 172 CHAPTER 6: DISINTEGRATION AND REINTEGRATION OF NORDIC ALCOHOL CONTROL POLICIES…….….…………………………………….…...……. 179 6.1 Introduction…………….………………………………………………..………... 179 6.2 Disintegration of Nordic alcohol control policies?…………………..….….…… 180 6.3 Disintegration of Nordic alcohol control policy cooperation?…....………..…… 185 6.4 Policy integration and national problem- solving………………….……….…… 191 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSIONS………….……………………….…...…….…………..…. 199 7.1 Europeanization of Nordic alcohol control policies….…….…….…...………… 199 7.1.1 The policy context: Policy mismatch and re-categorization…...……………… 200 7.1.2 The policy process: Policy reconsideration and justification.…….…..………. 202 7.1.3 The policy outcomes: Disintegration and reintegration…..….…….……….…. 206 7.1.4 Different affiliation but similar outcomes………..…………….....…..…………. 211 7.1.5 Trends of policy homogenisation?……………………………..………………… 213 7.2 Dynamics of public policy change and continuity….……....…………………… 215 7.2.1 Eight theoretical themes on policy dynamics…...…..………………………….. 216 Appendix 1: Nordic Alcohol Control Policies and the EU – A Chronology……..… 221 Appendix 2: Letters………………………………………………………………..……... 235 Appendix 3: Informants………………………………………………………..………… 237 References………………………………………………………………………………… 239 -5- FIGURES Figure 1.1 A policy re-categorization model……...……………………………...…..... 39 Figure 3.1 Comparative dollar price levels on alcoholic beverages of final expenditure of GDP in 1993…...………………………………..…….....… 89 Figure 3.2 Principal exporting countries of alcoholic beverages in the world in 1992... 93 Figure 3.3 Per capita alcohol consumption in 15 European countries in 1990…….….. 95 Figure 4.1 Excises on alcohol in the EU member states and Norway, 1995…………. 138 Figure 4.2 Maximum quantities of beer, wine, strong wine and spirits that can be brought back by travellers for personal consumption after visits in other countries within the EEA Area as of 1995…..…...……...…......…... 141 Figure 6.1 Excises on beer (5 %) in Euro per litre pure alcohol, 1995-2001…..…..… 194 Figure 6.2 Excises on wine (11%) in Euro per litre pure alcohol, 1995-2001……….. 194 Figure 6.3 Excises on strong wine in Euro per litre pure alcohol, 1995-2001….……. 195 Figure 6.4 Excises on spirits in Euro per litre pure alcohol, 1995-2001…...….…...… 195 -6- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation owes much of its content to the thoughts and efforts of persons other than the author. My greatest debts are to my supervisor Johan P. Olsen, whose ideas and insights inspired me throughout this study. His comments and suggestions on various drafts were always pertinent, and I never left his office without having learnt something. Johan also welcomed me to the stimulating multi- disciplinary research environment at ARENA (Advanced Research on the Europeanization of the Nation State), University of Oslo; a contact that I have benefited substantially from. I am also deeply grateful to the National Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research, SIRUS (former SIFA) for their financing of this study, as well as for providing me with excellent working conditions continuously since 1996. My appreciation goes to both academic colleagues and administrative staff. Through SIRUS I was introduced to the very active alcohol research community in the Nordic countries at an early stage. This co-operation has lead to several books and articles, and my thanks go to co-authors, editors and reviewers of these collaborative projects. Thanks also to the GRASP (Health and Prevention Research Group), University of Montreal where I worked as a visiting researcher for some months on two occasions during this study. My gratitude also goes to Elizabeth Meehan at the Queen’s University of Belfast for stimulating
Recommended publications
  • Multikulturell Rugekasse

    Multikulturell Rugekasse

    Multikulturell Rugekasse Fremskrittspartiets argumentasjon om innvandring før valg 1987-2001 Universitetet i Bergen • Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap MEVI350 • Masteroppgave medievitenskap • Oskar Hjartåker Vår 2017 1 Tittel: Hentet fra et sitat av Jan Christensen (FrP) som omtalte bydelen sin som en «multikulturell rugekasse» (Ringheim, 2016: 155). Bilde: 21st Century Schizoid Man, lagd av undertegnede. Navnet er hentet fra sangtittelen til en låt av King Crimson. 2 Sammendrag Avhandlingen tar utgangspunkt avistekster fra Aftenposten, Verdens Gang og Stavanger Aftenblad, samt bøker om Fremskrittspartiets historie for å se på sammenhengen mellom Fremskrittspartiets indre konflikter og partiets argumentasjon om innvandring før valg mellom 1987-2001. Den historiske gjennomgangen viser sammenheng mellom konflikter og partiets argumentasjon om innvandring i avisene. Særskilt to konflikter skiller seg ut. Første konflikt ender med Dolkesjø-oppgjøret i 1994, hvor den liberalistiske medlemsmassen i partiet ble sterkt redusert. Den andre går fra Godlia-møtet frem til perioden rundt millenniumskiftet, hvor de upopulære innvandringskritikerne ble kastet ut eller fikk en redusert rolle i partiet. Argumentene til Fremskrittspartiet viser også at partiets representanter ikke utelukkende bruker retorisk argumentasjon om hva som bør gjøres, men også adresserer nåværende verdier, samt hva som har vært. Dette er ikke uvanlig i seg selv, analysen viser der i mot at dette skjer ofte. Samtidig knytter argumentasjonen til Fremskrittspartiet seg til en streng forståelse av statsborgerskap, noe som blir tydeliggjort i argumentasjonen. Fremskrittspartiet bruker tidvis bevisst strategi om stillhet i innvandringsdebatten, for eksempel under innvandringsdebatten i 1991. Implikasjonene for debatten er blant annet underinformering av innvandringsteamet. Her vises det til et eksempel i klartekst som viser svarunnvikelse av spørsmål fra partiet i perioden.
  • Institutt for Offentlig Retts Bibliografi 1957-2006

    Institutt for Offentlig Retts Bibliografi 1957-2006

    Institutt for offentlig retts bibliografi 1957-2006 Utarbeidet ved Det juridiske fakultetsbibliotek av Lars Finholt Jansen Randi Halveg Iversby (red.) Bård Sverre Tuseth (red.) I forbindelse med Institutt for offentlig retts 50-årsjubileum har Det juridiske fakultetsbibliotek utarbeidet instituttets bibliografi, det vil si en oversikt over skriftlige arbeider av instituttansatte i løpet av IORs første femti år. Bibliografien er begrenset til juridiske arbeider produsert ved Institutt for offentlig rett eller de instituttene som er innlemmet i Institutt for offentlig rett innenfor den enkeltes ansettelsesperiode. Forord til den elektroniske utgaven: Bibliografien foreligger hovedsakelig slik den ble publisert i Institutt for offentlig retts skriftserie nr 9 2007. Noen mindre feil er rettet og blanke sider er fjernet for å tilpasse dokumentet til det elektroniske formatet. Redaktørene, 15. mars 2012. Shaheen Sardar Ali ........................................................................................................... 10 Ivar Alvik .......................................................................................................................... 10 Johs. Andenæs................................................................................................................... 11 Kjell V. Andorsen ............................................................................................................. 31 Ole Rasmus Asbjørnsen ...................................................................................................
  • Persistence of Populism the Norwegian Progress Party, 1973-2009

    Persistence of Populism the Norwegian Progress Party, 1973-2009

    PhD thesis 2015 Persistence of Populism The Norwegian Progress Party, 1973-2009 A.R. Jupskås, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo © Anders Ravik Jupskås, 2015 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo No. 527 ISSN 1504-3991 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Hanne Baadsgaard Utigard. Printed in Norway: AIT Oslo AS. Produced in co-operation with Akademika publishing, Oslo. The thesis is produced by Akademika publishing merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Acknowledgements When I, as a student, was welcomed by the staff at Institutt for statsvitenskap (Department of political science, ISV) at the University of Oslo in 2003, I remember one the professors, Raino Malnes stressed – borrowing a quote from the famous English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley – that students in political science should ‘try to learn something about everything and everything about something’. Throughout my time as a student, I focused primarily on the first part of the advice. As a PhD student, however, I’ve tried to focus on the latter part by writing an in-depth analysis of the ideological and organizational development of one single party, namely Fremskrittspartiet (The Norwegian Progress Party, FrP). Whether or not I have succeeded is obviously up to the reader to decide. It wasn’t always supposed to be like this. For a long time I didn’t realize that writing (almost) everything about something was impossible without a very limited research question.
  • A Menace to Society

    A Menace to Society

    Faculty of Law University of Helsinki A Menace to Society Radicalism and Legal Scholarship in the United States, Scandinavia, and Finland, 1965─1980 Juhana Mikael Salojärvi ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Law of the University of Hel- sinki, for public examination in lecture room P III, Porthania, on the 23th November 2013, at 10 am. Helsinki 2013 Cover photo by Niko Kilpi Cover design by Juhana Salojärvi ISBN 978-952-10-9328-9 (pbk.) ISBN 978-952-10-9329-6 (PDF) (ethesis.helsinki.fi) Unigrafia Helsinki 2013 meanwhile, every 2 or 3 years, somebody in the academy, wanting to keep his place in the university structure (and if you think Vietnam is hell you ought to see what goes on between those so-called brains in battles of intrigue and power within their own little cellblocks) brings out the same old collection of glass and gutless poetry and labels it THE NEW POETRY or THE NEW NEW POETRY but it’s still the same marked deck Charles Bukowski This book is dedicated to nobody Preface Something has changed. The building at the other side of my room stares at me through my window as it has for the past three years, but something is different. It might be that the building is the same, but my perception of it has changed. Maybe I have changed. The past four years that I have spent writing this thesis, the first one just around the cor- ner and the last three in this room, have been truly remarkable in my life.
  • Efta-Annual-Report-1997.Pdf

    Efta-Annual-Report-1997.Pdf

    1997 T h i r t y- s e v e n t h An n e a l R e p o r t OP T h e E u r o p e a n F r e e T r a d e As s o c ia t io n April 1998 T h ir t y - s e v e n t h A n n u a l R e p o r t o f iT h e E u r o p e a n F r e e T r a d e A s s o c ia t io n Editor: Nikulas Hannigan Assistant editor: Camilla Blom EFTA Rue de Treves 74 1040 Brussels Design and production by Tuuli Sauren INSPIRIT International Advertising, Brussels Printed by Edition Imprimerie S.A., Brussels ■ // rC - T h ir t y - s e v e n t h A n n u a l R e p o r t o f T h e E u r o p e a n F r e e T r a d e A s s o c ia t io n FOREWORD Last year we took time out from our ordinary tasks to look at what EFTA am ounts to in world terms. The figures provide support for our belief that EFTA is a grouping which makes polit­ ical and economic sense - four countries which have a lot in common and much to offer to present and future free trade and cooperation partners.
  • Right Wing Populism in Europe: a Discoursive Rhetoric Focused on European Union, Ethno-Nationalism, Democracy and Globalization

    Right Wing Populism in Europe: a Discoursive Rhetoric Focused on European Union, Ethno-Nationalism, Democracy and Globalization

    RIGHT WING POPULISM IN EUROPE（DE CUETO NOGUERAS） Article RIGHT WING POPULISM IN EUROPE: A DISCOURSIVE RHETORIC FOCUSED ON EUROPEAN UNION, ETHNO-NATIONALISM, DEMOCRACY AND GLOBALIZATION DE CUETO NOGUERAS, Carlos Key words: Right-wing parties, populism, Euroscepticism, ethno-nationalism, democracy, globalization. 1. POPULISM IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS. Despite the fact that the term “populism” is highly ambivalent, it is increasingly used in the social sciences and has become a particular field in political analysis, without being precisely defined. Populism is a particular political rhetoric, which extremely simplifies complex problems and offers apparently easy, painless but at the same time vague solutions. However, due to the negative connotation of the term, far-right populist parties prefer to define themselves to be centrists, reject most of labels normally associated with them -con- servative, right-wing, racist, xenophobic- and threaten to take legal actions or denounce in some cases media companies and journalists who do. After a Swedish journalist of Sveriges Radion called the Sweden Democrats party xenophobic in 2013, the party reacted with a complaint lodged to the broadcasting regulator. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Hungary ruled that Jobbik couldn’t be labelled “far-right” in any domestic radio or television transmission. They present themselves as common men and women who understand and represent people, especially the under-privileged and under-represented segments, who know and voice their concerns, in contrast to the corrupt and established elites. Populism relies on charismatic leaders with decisive roles in their parties and on popular support. Populism respects the basic criteria of democracy but rejects all existing ideologies as insufficient for the particular society and tries to find and adopt its “own new path”.
  • Stortingsvalget 1997 (NOS C478)

    Stortingsvalget 1997 (NOS C478)

    oges oisiee saisikk Oicia Saisics o oway Strtnvlt 1997 Strtn Eltn 1997 Sttt ntrlbrå • Sttt r Oso-Kogsige r ffll I ee seie uisees oesakeig imæsaisikk saisikk a saisiske ttt egskassyseme og esuae a sesiee eige og uesøkese Seie a øs og ems eease- og okumeasosomå eseasoe ske eseig i om a aee igue og øeig iomaso om aamaeiae isamigs- og eaeiigsmeoe sam egee og eiisoe I iegg gis e e ko oesik oe oeesuaee Seie omae også uikasoee Saisisk åok isoisk saisikk og egioasaisikk sam Saae o osk saisikk og eiise i osk saisikk Offl Sttt f is seies cosiss maiy o imay saisics saisics om saisica accouig r sysems a esus o secia cesuses a sueys o eeece a ocume- aio uoses eseaio is asicay i e om o aes igues a ecessay iomaio aou aa coecio a ocessig meos a coces a eiiios I aiio a so oeiew o e mai esus is gie e seies aso icues e uicaios Saisica Yeaook isoica Saisics a egioa Saisics as we as Saas o owegia Saisics a Guie o owegia Saisics C Saisisk seayå seeme 199 e uk a maeiae a ee uikasoe eigs ogi Saisisk seayå som kie IS -537-573-7 ISS -97 Stndrdtn tbllr Sbl n tbl Sbl a ka ikke oekomme Caegoy o aicae Enrpp Ogae mage aa o aaiae 1 ag Ogae mage oeøig aa o ye aaiae a ka ikke oeiggøes o o uicaio Enrd u i oiiske aie eeseae Mie e 5 ess a 5 o ui Semmea a e uke eee emoye Soigsag Mie e 5 ess a 5 o ui ag a e uke eee emoye 0,0 ageakig oeøige a oisioa o eimiay igue u i e oee seie eak i e omogeeiy o a eica seies esig Eo ige esig u i e aee seie eak i e omogeeiy o a oioa seies ykk ac uigykk ee sie oige ugae eise sice e eious issue Norges offisielle statistikk Strtnvlt 1997 rrd
  • Til Høyre for Høyre

    Til Høyre for Høyre

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Til høyre for Høyre - Hvordan Høyre forholdt seg til Fremskrittspartiet 1973-1990 Fredrik Bøyesen Larsen Masteroppgave ved IAKH UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Høsten 2015 II Til høyre for Høyre - Hvordan Høyre forholdt seg til Fremskrittspartiet 1973-1990 Fredrik Bøyesen Larsen Høsten 2015 III © Fredrik Bøyesen Larsen 2015 Til høyre for Høyre – Hvordan Høyre forholdt seg til Fremskrittspartiet 1973-1990 Fredrik Bøyesen Larsen http://www.duo.uio.no Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Forord Norsk politisk historie har alltid vært min store interesse innenfor historiefaget, og spesielt hvordan de ulike partiene har forholdt seg til hverandre. Derfor var valget av tema på en måte lett da planleggingen av masteroppgaven begynte. Hvilke politiske aktører jeg skulle velge var på ingen måte gitt. Til slutt falt likevel valget på Fremskrittspartiet, først og fremst på grunn av dets fascinerende bakgrunnshistorie. Siden Fremskrittspartiet av mange blir regnet som et parti plassert på ytterste høyre fløy i norsk politikk, var det naturlig å se det i forhold til det partiet som tidligere hadde vært enerådende på høyresiden i norsk politikk, nemlig Høyre. Utgangspunktet for masteroppgaven ble hvordan Høyre forholdt seg til Fremskrittspartiet i perioden 1973-1990. Å få anledning til å undersøke de to partiene nærmere over en lengre periode har både vært interessant og givende. Resultatet foreligger her, og kan forhåpentligvis bidra til å belyse og nyansere temaet ytterligere. Forfatteren er ikke medlem av noe parti, og det har vært en målsetting å presentere historien objektivt, i den grad historieskrivning kan være objektiv.
  • Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway. a Collection Of

    Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway. a Collection Of

    Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway A Collection of Country Reports Edited by Esa Österberg and Thomas Karlsson 3 The authors and their affiliation ALLAMAN A LLAMANI: Centro Alcologico Integrato e Unità di epidemiologia dell’Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy SIMONA ANAV: Permanent Observatory on Youth & Alcohol, Rome, Italy ANNIE BRITTON: Health Promotion Sciences Unit, Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, The United Kingdom SEAN BYRNE: Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland FRANCESCO CIPRIANI: Centro Alcologico Integrato e Unità di epidemiologia dell’Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy IRMGARD EISENBACH-STANGL: Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Addiction Research, Vienna, Austria DIMITRA GEFOU-MADIANOU: Department of Social Policy & Social Anthropology, Section of Social Anthropology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece ANN HOPE: National Alcohol Surveillance Project, Health Promotion Unit, Department of Health, Dublin, Ireland SVEN JÜNGER: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany THOMAS KARLSSON: Alcohol and Drug Research, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland LUDWIG KRAUS: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany PETRA KÜMMLER: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany ESA ÖSTERBERG: Alcohol and Drug Research, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland DANIELE ROSSI: Permanent Observatory on Youth & Alcohol, Rome, Italy ALFRED UHL: Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute
  • Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway

    Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Julkari Alcohol Policies in EU Member States and Norway A Collection of Country Reports Edited by Esa Österberg and Thomas Karlsson 3 The authors and their affiliation ALLAMAN A LLAMANI: Centro Alcologico Integrato e Unità di epidemiologia dell’Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy SIMONA ANAV: Permanent Observatory on Youth & Alcohol, Rome, Italy ANNIE BRITTON: Health Promotion Sciences Unit, Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, The United Kingdom SEAN BYRNE: Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland FRANCESCO CIPRIANI: Centro Alcologico Integrato e Unità di epidemiologia dell’Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy IRMGARD EISENBACH-STANGL: Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Addiction Research, Vienna, Austria DIMITRA GEFOU-MADIANOU: Department of Social Policy & Social Anthropology, Section of Social Anthropology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece ANN HOPE: National Alcohol Surveillance Project, Health Promotion Unit, Department of Health, Dublin, Ireland SVEN JÜNGER: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany THOMAS KARLSSON: Alcohol and Drug Research, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland LUDWIG KRAUS: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany PETRA KÜMMLER: Institute for Therapy Research, Munich, Germany ESA ÖSTERBERG: Alcohol and Drug Research, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland DANIELE ROSSI: Permanent Observatory on Youth & Alcohol, Rome, Italy ALFRED UHL: Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Addiction Research, Vienna, Austria FABIO VOLLER: Centro Alcologico Integrato e Unità di epidemiologia dell’Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy 5 Contents Foreword By David Byrne ...................................................................... 13 Acknowledgements ................................................................................. 15 Chapter 1.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Books and Edited Books Aasved, M. J. (2003). The biology of gambling (The gambling theory and research series, Vol. 13). Springfi eld: Charles C Thomas Publisher Ltd. American Psychiatric Association (Ed.) (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Vol. 5). Washington, DC/London: American Psychiatric Publishing. Andrew, D. T. (2013). Aristocratic vice: The attack on duelling, suicide, adultery, and gambling in eighteenth-century England . New Haven: Yale University Press. Andenas, M., & Roth, W.-H. (2002). Services and free movement in EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arai-Takahashi, Y. (2002). The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR . Intersentia Uitgevers NV: Antwerp/Oxford/New York. Baker, A. (2000). Serious shopping: Essays in psychotherapy and consumerism . London: Free Association Books. Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes : Neuro linguistic programming. Moab: Real People Press. Bartlett, P., Lewis, O., & Thorold, O. (2007). Mental disability and the European convention on human rights . Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Baudenbacher, C. (1997). A brief guide to European state aid law (European Business Law and Practice Series, Vol. 13). The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International. Baudenbacher, C. (2008). EFTA Court – Legal framework and case law (3rd ed.). Luxembourg: EFTA Court. Baudenbacher, C. (2010). The EFTA Court in action – Five lectures . Stuttgart: German Law Publishers. Baudenbacher, C., & Brauchlin, E. (Eds.) (1993) Nach dem schweizerischen Nein und dem liechtensteinischen Ja zum EWR . St.Gallen: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. Baudenbacher, C., & Planzer, S. (2011). The role of precedent (International Dispute Resolution Conference, Vol. 3). Stuttgart: German Law Publishers.
  • Strukturert 1 Tore.Fm

    Strukturert 1 Tore.Fm

    Innst. S. nr. 1 (2001-2002) Innstilling fra fullmaktskomiteen om fullmaktene Til Stortinget INNLEDNING Når det gjelder listeforslagene fra Det Liberale Fol- Den forberedende fullmaktskomité som det 145. kepartiet, viser komiteens flertall, Asmund Storting valgte til å avgi foreløpig innstilling om full- Kristoffersen, Bendiks H. Arnesen, maktene for stortingsrepresentantene og deres varare- Marit Nybakk, Signe Øye, Ansgar Gabri- presentanter på det 146., 147., 148. og 149. Storting, la elsen, Ivar Kristiansen, Elisabeth fram sin innstilling 28. september 2001. Røbekk Nørve, Sonja Irene Sjøli, Rolf Da Stortinget trådte sammen 1. oktober 2001, ble Reikvam, Heidi Grande Røys, Åse Gun- følgende representanter valgt til medlemmer av full- hild Woie Duesund, Ingmar Ljones, Mor- maktskomiteen: ten Lund, Odd Einar Dørum og Steinar Bendiks Harald Arnesen, Steinar Bastesen, Åse Bastesen, til merknadene fra flertallet i den forbere- Gunhild Woie Duesund, Odd Einar Dørum, Ansgar dende komité, og er enig i disse. Gabrielsen, Carl I. Hagen, Ivar Kristiansen, Asmund Kristoffersen, Ingmar Ljones, Morten Lund, Marit Komiteens medlemmer Carl I. Hagen og Nybakk, Elisabeth Røbekk Nørve, Rolf Reikvam, Lodve Solholm viser til merknadene fra den forbe- Heidi Grande Røys, Sonja Irene Sjøli, Lodve Solholm redende komités medlemmer Carl I. Hagen og Hans J. og Signe Øye. Røsjorde, og er enig i disse. Fullmaktskomiteen valgte samme dag Komiteens medlem Steinar Bastesen Asmund Kristoffersen som leder, Ansgar Gabrielsen viser til sine merknader i innstillingen fra den forbere- som nestleder og Lodve Solholm som sekretær. dende komité. Stortinget oversendte i sitt møte 1. oktober 2001 inn- stillingen fra den forberedende komité til fullmaktsko- miteen. KLAGE FRA ODDBJØRN MARKUSSEN Innstillingen fra den forberedende komité følger som OVER FORHÅNDSSTEMMEGIVNINGEN vedlegg 1.