DOCSLIB.ORG

Trepanation: History, Discovery, Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trepanation: History, Discovery, Theory CONTENTS i TREPANATION ii CONTENTS CONTENTS iii TREPANATION History, Discovery, Theory Edited by ROBERT ARNOTT Centre for the History of Medicine, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, UK STANLEY FINGER Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA C.U.M. SMITH Aston University, Birmingham, UK With the Support of BOLESLAV LICHTERMAN Postgraduate Medical Academy, Moscow, Russia RUPERT BREITWIESER Institute for Ancient History, University of Salzburg, Austria LISSE ABINGDON EXTON (PA) TOKYO This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Applied for Copyright © 2003 Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publishers. Although all care is taken to ensure the integrity and quality of this publication and the information herein, no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to property or persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein. Published by: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers www.szp.swets.nl ISBN 0-203-97094-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 90 265 1923 0 (Print Edition) CONTENTS v Contents Preface ix Part 1: Trepanation: Discovery and Palaeopathology Chapter 1. Ephraim George Squier’s Peruvian Skull and the Discovery of Cranial Trepanation Hiran R. Fernando & Stanley Finger 3 Chapter 2. On the Birth of Trepanation: The Thoughts of Paul Broca and Victor Horsley Stanley Finger & William T. Clower 19 Chapter 3. The Pathology of Trepanation: Differential Diagnosis, Healing and Dry Bone Appearance in Modern Cases Andreas G. Nerlich, O. Peschel, Albert Zink & Friedrich W. Rösing 43 Part 2: Trepanation in Europe Chapter 4. Review of Trepanations in British Antiquity Focusing on Funerary Context to Explain their Occurrence Charlotte Roberts & Jaqueline McKinley 55 Chapter 5. Trepanations and Pseudotrepanations: Evidence of Cranial Surgery from Prehistoric and Early Historic Ireland Barra Ó Donnabhain 79 Chapter 6. Ancient Trepanations and Differential Diagnosis: A Re-Evaluation of Skeletal Remains from Denmark Pia Bennike 95 Chapter 7. Trepanation in the Portuguese Late Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Periods Ana Maria Silva 117 Chapter 8. A Neolithic Case of Cranial Trepanation (Eira Pedrinha, Portugal) Rui Pedro Gama & Eugénia Cunha 131 vi CONTENTS Chapter 9. New Cases of Cranial Trepanation Gaspare Baggieri & Martina di Giacomo 137 Chapter 10. Celtic Trepanations in Austria Rupert Breitwieser 147 Chapter 11. A Bregmatic Ossicle Resembling a Trepanation from an Eleventh-Century Skeleton Excavated from a Cemetary Area Now Within the Prague Castle, Czech Republic Marshall Joseph Becker 155 Chapter 12. Prehistoric Trepanations in Russia: Ritual or Surgical? Maria Mednikova 163 Chapter 13. Cranial Surgery: The Epipalaeolithic to Neolithic Populations of Ukraine Malcolm Lillie 175 Part 3: Trepanation in Africa, Asia and The Americas Chapter 14. Perforating Skull Trauma in Ancient Egypt and Evidence for Early Neurosurgical Therapy Andreas G. Nerlich, Albert Zink, Ulrike Szeimies, Hjalmar G. Hagedorn & Friedrich W. Rösing 191 Chapter 15. Four Cases of Trepanation from Mongolia, Showing Surgical Variation Naran Bazarsad 203 Chapter 16. Trepanations and Perforated Crania from Iron Age South Siberia: An Exercise in Differential Diagnosis Eileen Murphy 209 Chapter 17. Trepanation in Prehistoric South America: Geographic and Temporal Trends over 2,000 Years John W. Verano 223 Chapter 18. Pre-Columbian Skull Trepanation in North America James L. Stone & Javier Urcid 237 CONTENTS vii Part 4: Trepanation in Western Medicine Chapter 19. Galen and the Uses of Trepanation Julius Rocca 253 Chapter 20. Lorenz Heister (1683-1758) and the “Bachmann Case”: Social Setting and Medical Practice of Trepanation in Eighteenth-Century Germany Marion Maria Ruisinger 273 Chapter 21. The Evolution of Cranial Saws and Related Instruments John Kirkup 289 Part 5: Global Perspectives and Future Research Chapter 22. Trepanation from the Palaeolithic to the Internet Charles C. Gross 307 Chapter 23. Why Trepan? Contributions from Medical History and the South Pacific Graham Martin 323 Chapter 24. An Overview from Neolithic Times to Broca F. Clifford Rose 347 Chapter 25. The Future Direction of Research Don Brothwell 365 Subject Index 373 Author Index 391 Name Index 399 viii CONTENTS “I have the honour to present to the Academy an ancient Peruvian skull on which trepanning was performed during the lifetime of the individual” Paul Broca, 1867 CONTENTS ix Preface After examining the pre-Columbian skull sent to him by United States diplomat to Peru, E. G. Squier, in 1867, French surgeon-anthropologist Paul Broca astounded the world of science and medicine by suggesting that the cranial opening was the result of some form of prehistoric surgery. Moreover, the Inca on whom the procedure had been performed had survived the ordeal by a few weeks. This was not the first reported example of a man-made opening of a skull, nor was it by any means the earliest. But it was the first case of trepanation to be correctly identified, interpreted, and accepted, and as such it made people think about why the skulls of living people were opened in the distant past. Clearly, the Squier skull marked the start of serious study and intense fascination with trepanation. Within a few decades, scholarly (and sometimes not so scholarly) contributions were beginning to fill the journals. This growth has continued to accel- erate and researchers today are by any standard exceedingly prolific. In 1975 Guido Majno remarked that the number of papers on the subject of cranial trepanation prob- ably exceeds the number of specimens known throughout the world! Today, even with more skulls unearthed, we would be pressed to think of the multiple. Despite the exponential growth of research on this subject, something important has been lacking. Simply put, there is little cohesion. The study of cranial trepanation has, over the years, gone in many different directions, and the leading scholars now actively involved represent many regions, disciplines, and approaches. These diverse researchers, historians, and theorists, however, have rarely come together, never mind engaging in a large group discussion to consider common problems and future direc- tions for the field. The need for more interaction, more cooperation, and a fruitful exchange of ideas was apparent to all of the editors of this volume. The “time had come”, we all agreed, for research on cranial trepanation to be taken forward. This volume arises out of the first International Colloquium on Cranial Trepanation in Human History, which was held at the University of Birmingham (UK) between the 7th and the 9th of April, 2000. The idea for this much-needed colloquium was conceived by Robert Arnott of the Department of Ancient History and Archaeology (now of the Centre for the History of Medicine) of the University of Birmingham. It was officially supported by the International Society for the History of the Neuro- sciences, the Institute of Ancient History of the University of Salzburg (Austria), and the Russian Postgraduate Medical Academy (Moscow). The conference was truly an international gathering, as had been hoped for by the organizers, bringing together 89 scholars from 16 countries across four continents. Before Birmingham, many of these scholars had not only never met each other, but in some cases had never even heard of each other’s work. Taking the podium with slides too numerous to count were archaeologists, anthropologists (physical and social), pa- thologists, anatomists, surgeons, historians of medicine, and others with their own specializations. The material they described (all papers were in English) ranged chro- nologically from the Epipaleolithic Ukraine to eighteenth-century Germany. Geograph- ically they not only covered the rich terrains of Eastern and Western Europe and the x PREFACE New World, but also recent finds from Polynesia and even Mongolia. Many participants addressed the features of crania and theorized about the patho- logical conditions that might have led to the surgery. But there were also discussions about the evolution of instruments and thoughtful reassessments of specimens studied in the past and the methodologies used. The doyen of British paleopathology, Don Brothwell, fittingly closed the symposium by telling those in the audience where, from his perspective, new efforts should be directed. Because there had not been a book providing an extensive, up-to-date overview or synthesis of our understanding of cranial trepanation in human history, it was decided early on that the material presented at the Birmingham conference should be edited and published under one cover. Our intent was not only to serve laboratory and field scientists, but to provide a balanced volume on cranial trepanation for any profession- al or layman who might have an interest in this fascinating subject. The opening chapters in this volume deal with how trepanned skulls were initially found, and the theories
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummies and Mummification Practices in the Southern and Southwestern United States Mahmoud Y
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 1998 Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States Mahmoud Y. El-Najjar Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan Thomas M. J. Mulinski Chicago, Illinois Karl Reinhard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard El-Najjar, Mahmoud Y.; Mulinski, Thomas M. J.; and Reinhard, Karl, "Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States" (1998). Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications. 13. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in MUMMIES, DISEASE & ANCIENT CULTURES, Second Edition, ed. Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore A. Reyman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 7 pp. 121–137. Copyright © 1998 Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States MAHMOUD Y. EL-NAJJAR, THOMAS M.J. MULINSKI AND KARL J. REINHARD Mummification was not intentional for most North American prehistoric cultures. Natural mummification occurred in the dry areas ofNorth America, where mummies have been recovered from rock shelters, caves, and over­ hangs. In these places, corpses desiccated and spontaneously mummified. In North America, mummies are recovered from four main regions: the south­ ern and southwestern United States, the Aleutian Islands, and the Ozark Mountains ofArkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global History of Paleopathology
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd i 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:58:03:58 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY Pioneers and Prospects EDITED BY JANE E. BUIKSTRA AND CHARLOTTE A. ROBERTS 3 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiiiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 1 Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With o! ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland " ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © #$%# by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. %&' Madison Avenue, New York, New York %$$%( www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. CIP to come ISBN-%): ISBN $–%&- % ) * + & ' ( , # Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iivv 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN To J.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cremation in Mexico 3,000 Years Ago
    Human cremation in Mexico 3,000 years ago William N. Duncan*†, Andrew K. Balkansky‡, Kimberly Crawford‡, Heather A. Lapham‡, and Nathan J. Meissner‡ *Department of Anthropology, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY 14618; and ‡Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 Edited by Joyce Marcus, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and approved February 22, 2008 (received for review November 10, 2007) Mixtec nobles are depicted in codices and other proto-historic ological contexts and osteological analyses of the burials, and documentation taking part in funerary rites involving cremation. evaluate the evidence based on known aspects of the Mixtec The time depth for this practice was unknown, but excavations at mortuary program. These early examples of cremation, along the early village site of Tayata, in the southern state of Oaxaca, with other factors, could reflect the emergence of ranked Mexico, recovered undisturbed cremation burials in contexts dat- society in the ancient Mixteca Alta and indicate that proto- ing from the eleventh century B.C. These are the earliest examples historic methods of marking social status had precursors of a burial practice that in later times was reserved for Mixtec kings extending back 3,000 years from the present. and Aztec emperors. This article describes the burial contexts and human remains, linking Formative period archaeology with eth- Archaeological Context nohistorical descriptions of Mixtec mortuary practices. The use of Survey and excavation indicate that Tayata was among the cremation to mark elevated social status among the Mixtec was largest villages of the preurban Formative period in the established by 3,000 years ago, when hereditary differences in Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico (18, 19).
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Officers and Students of Transylvania University
    atrairgglfranfa Journal of iftmcfnfr»=3Ertra. A OP THE OFFICERS AND STUDENTS ' y TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY. LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY, JANUARY, 18*6. LEXINGTON, KY: CLARKE S; CO. PRINTERS—UPPER STREET. 1836. TRUSTEES. ROBERT WICKLIFFE, Esq., CA’m., Hon. THOMAS M. HICKEY, BENJAMIN GRATZ, A. M., THOMAS NELSON, Esq., Rev. NATHAN H. HALL, HENRY CONYERS PAYNE, Esq., Rev. SPENCER COOPER, BENJAMIN TAYLOR, Esq., Rev. JACOB CREATH, Jr., WILLIAM RICHARDSON, Esq., Hon. FIELDING L. TURNER, WILLIAM A. LEAYY, Esq., WALTER DUNN, Esq., LESLIE COMBS, Esq., JAMES WEIR, Esq., THOMAS A. RUSSELL, E.q, FACULTY. Ret. THOMAS W. COIT, D. D., President, and Morrison Professor of Moral Philosophy and Metaphysics. BENJAMIN WINSLOW DUDLEY, M. D., Professor of Anatomy and Surgery. CHARLES CALDWELL, M. D., Professor of the Institutes aud Clinical Practice. JOHN ESTEN COOKE, M. D., Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine. WILLIAM HALL RICHARDSON, M. D., Professor of Obstetrics and the Diseases of Womenand Children. CHARLES WILKINS SHORT, M. D., a and Medical and Dean Professor of Materia Medic Botany, of the Medical Faculty. LUNSFORD PITTS YANDELL, M. D., Professor of Chemistry and Pharmacy. ROBERT PETER, M. D., Librarian of the Medical Library. Hon. DANIEL MAYES, Professor of Statute and Common Law. Hon. GEORGE ROBERTSON, L. L. D., and Constitutional Law and Professor of National , Equitable Jurisprudence. CHARLES CALDWELL, M. D., Professor of Medical Jurisprudence. BENJAMIN MOORE, A. M., Professor of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy. Rev. SAMUEL Y. MARSHALL, A. M., Professor of Languages. ROBERT PETER, M. D., Professor of Chemistry in Morrison College. JOHN A. ROUSSEAU, Principal of the Preparatory Department. GEORGE AITKIN, Assistant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ötzi the Iceman Worksheets
    From mummies to mitochondria, skeletons to sequencing, Denisovans to DNA, molecules to murder…. Our human Inheritance Understanding our genetic ancestry & what makes us human featuring Ötzi the iceman Look at the mummy! Did you know: The Making of Ötzi’s Replica What type of images were used to make Ötzi’s ancient tattoos were the 3D print of Ötzi? made by making fine cuts in his skin and then rubbing charcoal in the cuts. Where in Italy is the real mummy stored? Ancient Ink Ötzi has 57 visible tattoos in the form of small lines and crosses. (4 cannot be seen.) Fatal Wound FIND and DRAW as many tattoos as you can on the illustration of the iceman’s mummy Evidence suggests that Ötzi was shot by (each line counts as a single tattoo; a cross an arrow, and this caused his death. would count as two). MARK the location of the arrow wound with an “X” on the Ötzi to the right. Damage CIRCLE the area of the mummy that is damaged. Did you know? The arrowhead that caused Ötzi to Did you know: bleed to death wasn’t This damage was caused discovered until 10 years after accidentally by a power tool the mummy was found. during the recovery of the mummy in 1991. Ötzi the iceman Read the panels! Did you know? Did you know? A paper published in 2016 All except one of Ötzi’s shows that Otzi also carried H. fingernails were missing; a pylori, a bacteria associated single detached nail was with stomach ulcers! found by his body! DNA Analysis Scientists identified DNA from different bacteria One of Ötzi’s fingernails had horizontal ridges and other living things.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egypt – How Were Mummies Made?
    Notes for teachers Ancient Egypt – How were mummies made? Aims To help students understand the process of mummification To provide students with initial information suggesting why bodies were mummified To encourage students to consider a range of sources in their enquiries Description A sequence of 10 slides to explore an overall question: ‘How were mummies made?’ Slide 2 is a quote from Herodotus describing mummification Slides 3 to 9 describe the process of mummification Teaching ideas The presentation can be used on a whiteboard with the whole class or could be followed by individual students or groups. Use slide 2, Herodotus’ description of mummification, to break the process into stages. These could be supported and linked to images of objects used during each process. Explore the types of evidence used to show the process of mummification in this presentation. Discuss the use of written evidence and evidence derived from objects. Use the presentation as a starting point for understanding why mummification and the survival of the body was important to the ancient Egyptians. Explore the Mummification chapter of the British Museum’s Ancient Egypt website: www.ancientegypt.co.uk which provides information on mummification, a virtual mummy and coffin to explore and a challenge to journey through the underworld. Notes on the pictures Slide 3: Removal of the organs (images listed below in the order they appear) Bronze probe from Egypt, after 664 BC. Hooks such as this were used to remove the brain. X-rays of mummies sometime show small broken bones in the naval cavity caused when removing the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Art
    PREHISTORIC ART THE BEGINNING Not until 25,000 years ago did out forebears invent art • The first art objects were created not to adorn the body or decorate the cavern--- But attempt to control or appease natural forces CAVE PAINTING • FIRST PAINTINGS WERE MADE ABOUT 15,000 YEARS • BEFORE THE DISCOVERY IN 1996 THE IMAGES AT LASCAUX, FRANCE WERE THE OLDEST KNOWN PAINTINGS IN EUROPE • PAINTINGS MOST REMOTE RECESSES OF THE CAVE—WHERE THERE WAS NO SUNLIGHT WHY DID THEY PAINT THESE IMAGES? • Maybe : • certain animals are symbolic • others represent mythical spirits • to contact spirits in another world • to track migration patterns • related to ritual occasions HORSE CAVE PAINTING 13,000 B.C. SCULPTURE OLDEST SURVIVING ART OBJECTS ARE SCULPTURES VENUS OF WILLENDORF • 25,000- 20,000 BC • ONE OT THE EARLIEST KNOWN HUMAN FIGURES • VENUS GODDNESS OF LOVE • FERTILITY IMAGE • CARRIED AROUND AS AN AMULET—GOOD LUCK CHARM • ONLY FEATURES SHOWING BELLY, BREASTS AND PUBIC AREA • ONLY 5 INCHES TALL • Paleolithic Period:::OLD STONE AGE • After 4000 years gave way to: • NEOLITHIC OR NEW STONE AGE • New stone tools---learned to farm—domesticate animals (cattle—goats –etc.)help with labor, food, milk and leather • Technology of pottery • Settled communities ---architecture of stone and wood were starting to be built ARCHITECTURE STONE HENGE 2,000 B.C. Certain conditions foster preservation of Art • Durable materials ( stone-metal-fired clay) • Local of environment not destructive to artworks • Stable population- • Putting artworks in places of limited or no
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Death at the Pe Ş Tera Cu Oase
    Life and Death at the Pe ş tera cu Oase 00_Trinkaus_Prelims.indd i 8/31/2012 10:06:29 PM HUMAN EVOLUTION SERIES Series Editors Russell L. Ciochon, The University of Iowa Bernard A. Wood, George Washington University Editorial Advisory Board Leslie C. Aiello, Wenner-Gren Foundation Susan Ant ó n, New York University Anna K. Behrensmeyer, Smithsonian Institution Alison Brooks, George Washington University Steven Churchill, Duke University Fred Grine, State University of New York, Stony Brook Katerina Harvati, Univertit ä t T ü bingen Jean-Jacques Hublin, Max Planck Institute Thomas Plummer, Queens College, City University of New York Yoel Rak, Tel-Aviv University Kaye Reed, Arizona State University Christopher Ruff, John Hopkins School of Medicine Erik Trinkaus, Washington University in St. Louis Carol Ward, University of Missouri African Biogeography, Climate Change, and Human Evolution Edited by Timothy G. Bromage and Friedemann Schrenk Meat-Eating and Human Evolution Edited by Craig B. Stanford and Henry T. Bunn The Skull of Australopithecus afarensis William H. Kimbel, Yoel Rak, and Donald C. Johanson Early Modern Human Evolution in Central Europe: The People of Doln í V ĕ stonice and Pavlov Edited by Erik Trinkaus and Ji ří Svoboda Evolution of the Hominin Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable Edited by Peter S. Ungar Genes, Language, & Culture History in the Southwest Pacifi c Edited by Jonathan S. Friedlaender The Lithic Assemblages of Qafzeh Cave Erella Hovers Life and Death at the Pe ş tera cu Oase: A Setting for Modern Human Emergence in Europe Edited by Erik Trinkaus, Silviu Constantin, and Jo ã o Zilh ã o 00_Trinkaus_Prelims.indd ii 8/31/2012 10:06:30 PM Life and Death at the Pe ş tera cu Oase A Setting for Modern Human Emergence in Europe Edited by Erik Trinkaus , Silviu Constantin, Jo ã o Zilh ã o 1 00_Trinkaus_Prelims.indd iii 8/31/2012 10:06:30 PM 3 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Professor Alice Roberts' Citation
    PROFESSOR ALICE ROBERTS Pro-Chancellor, Professor Alice Roberts is an anatomist, author and broadcaster. She qualified as a medical doctor with a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery and an intercalated Bachelor of Science in Anatomy from the University of Wales College of Medicine (now part of Cardiff University). Later she took a PhD in paleopathology, the study of disease in ancient human remains. After graduating in 1997 she worked for a year in clinical medicine as a junior doctor in South Wales. In the following year she moved to the University of Bristol, first as a demonstrator in the Anatomy Department and then, a year later, as a lecturer. Later, as Senior Teaching Fellow at the University’s Centre for Comparative and Clinical Anatomy, she taught clinical anatomy, embryology, and physical anthropology, as well as researching in osteoarchaeology and paleopathology. She left the University in 2009 to become a freelancer, but remained a Visiting Fellow in both the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology and the Department of Anatomy. Alice has been Director of Anatomy for the National Health Service Severn Deanery Postgraduate School of Surgery since 2009. Last year she took up her present post as the University of Birmingham's first Professor of Public Engagement in Science. She is also an Honorary Fellow of the British Science Association and of the Society of Biology, But Alice is most widely known for a remarkably eclectic range of TV programmes in which she has indeed promoted public engagement in science to great effect. Her broadcasting career began with Channel 4’s Time Team in 2001; she later appeared in the Coast series, and went on to present (and in some cases to design) a range of series and individual documentaries on BBC2.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY VERSION 1 COLLEGE of the CANYONS COLLEGE Physical Anthropology
    ANTH 101 PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY VERSION 1 COLLEGE OF THE CANYONS COLLEGE Physical Anthropology An Open Educational Resources Publication by Taft College Authored and compiled by Sarah Etheredge Editor: Trudi Radtke Version 2 2019 1 | Physical Anthropology – College of the Canyons Acknowledgements We would like to extend appreciation to the following people and organizations for allowing this textbook to be created: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Chancellor Dianne G. Van Hook Santa Clarita Community College District College of the Canyons Distance Learning Office Written & Compiled by: Sarah Etheredge Special Thank You to Editor Trudi Radtke for formatting, readability, and aesthetics. Disclaimer: “The contents of this (insert type of publication; e.g., report, flyer, etc.) were developed under the Title V grant from the Department of Education (Award #P031S140092). However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.” *Unless otherwise noted, the content in this textbook is licensed under CC BY 4.0 2 | Physical Anthropology – College of the Canyons Table of Contents Physical Anthropology .................................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Case Study
    Impact case study (REF3b) Institution: University College London Unit of Assessment: 17A – Geography, Environmental Studies & Archaeology: Archaeology Title of case study: Voicebox: Research on the physics and evolution of speech facilitating science teaching in secondary schools 1. Summary of the impact (indicative maximum 100 words) As part of an EU-funded project on human evolution, a multi-disciplinary team led by a UCL archaeologist reconstructed the vocal tracts and potential speech sounds of Neanderthals (our most closely related extinct relatives). This experience was used to develop Voicebox: The Physics and Evolution of Speech, a pre-GCSE science teaching resource, with a booklet, DVD and physical apparatus. The booklet and DVD were distributed to about 6,500 UK science teachers. A follow-up evaluation in London schools confirmed that the Voicebox is seen as a valuable extension activity that has the potential to interest and engage pupils, including those with a low general level of interest in science subjects. 2. Underpinning research (indicative maximum 500 words) As part of a wider study of the evolution of the human brain, language, and tool use [c], a multidisciplinary team led by Dr James Steele (UCL Institute of Archaeology since 2006) reconstructed the Neanderthal vocal tract and its potential to articulate speech sounds. The anatomical reconstruction used 3D scans of Neanderthal skulls, and 3D scans of the soft tissue of human and chimpanzee vocal tracts (from which a predictive model of the position of the tongue root in the Neanderthal vocal tract was obtained by 3D morphometric analysis). The software modelling of the vocal tract’s speech potential was done using purpose-built software (Simus_Neanderthal) based on a pre-existing software articulatory model of the human vocal tract and its acoustic properties.
    [Show full text]