DOCSLIB.ORG

Stanford Chronic Pain Management Resident Rotation Syllabus Version 2009-10 Updated December 1, 2010 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stanford Chronic Pain Management Resident Rotation Syllabus Version 2009-10 Updated December 1, 2010 Contents Stanford Chronic Pain Management Resident Rotation Syllabus Version 2009-10 Updated December 1, 2010 http://paincenter.stanford.edu Contents Pain Management Faculty .................................................................................................................................... 3 Volunteer Clinical Faculty .................................................................................................................................. 3 Goals & Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Patient Care ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Medical Knowledge ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Practice-Based Learning & Improvement ......................................................................................................... 4 Interpersonal & Communication Skills .............................................................................................................. 5 Professionalism ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Systems-Based Practice ................................................................................................................................... 5 Procedural Rotation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Patient Care ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Medical Knowledge ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Practice-Based Learning & Improvement ...................................................................................................... 6 Interpersonal & Communication Skills ........................................................................................................... 6 Professionalism ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Systems-Based Practice ............................................................................................................................... 7 Pathophysiology ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Cancer-related Pain .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Neuropathy ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Metastatic cancer-induced bone pain ............................................................................................................... 8 Directly tumor-related pain ................................................................................................................................ 8 Chemical ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Chronic Pain States .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1 | Page Stanford Chronic Pain Management Resident Rotation Syllabus Acute and Chronic Neck and Low Back Pain .................................................................................................... 8 Neuropathic Pain States ................................................................................................................................... 8 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Types 1 & 2 ......................................................................................... 8 Postherpetic Neuralgia .................................................................................................................................. 9 Phantom Limb Pain ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Peripheral Neuropathies (e.g., Diabetic Neuropathy) .................................................................................. 10 Somatic Pain Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 10 Facet Arthropathy ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Myofascial Pain: .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Fibromyalgia ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Further Reading: .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Treatment ........................................................................................................................................................... 31 Cancer-Related Pain .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Cancer Bone Pain ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Spinal Anesthesia ........................................................................................................................................... 34 Neurolysis ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 World Health Organization (WHO) 3-step Analgesic Ladder (1984 ................................................................ 40 Chronic Pain (Non-Cancer Related) ................................................................................................................... 43 Opioid Analgesics – Incl. Tolerance & Addiction ............................................................................................. 43 Anticonvulsants ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Muscle Relaxants for Back Spasms ................................................................................................................ 43 Epidural Analgesia .......................................................................................................................................... 44 Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Chronic Pain ....................................................................................................... 48 Sympathetic Nerve Blocks .............................................................................................................................. 51 Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation ................................................................................................................. 55 Spinal Cord Stimulation ................................................................................................................................... 56 Radiofrequency ............................................................................................................................................... 59 Other General Components ................................................................................................................................ 61 Physical Examination ...................................................................................................................................... 61 Outcomes in Pain Medicine ............................................................................................................................ 63 Radiation Risk and Interventional Pain Procedures ........................................................................................ 71 2 | Page Stanford Chronic Pain Management Resident Rotation Syllabus Pain Management Faculty Sean Mackey, M.D., Ph.D., Chief, Division of Pain Management, Associate Professor Raymond Gaeta, M.D., Associate Professor, Medical Director, Pain Management Center Ravi Prasad, Ph.D., Clinical Assistant Professor, Assistant Director, Division of Pain Management Wendye Robbins, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Ian Carroll, M.D., Clinical Instructor Kale Wedemeyer, M.D., Clinical Instructor Vanila Singh, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Josh Kirz, Ph.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Tim Dawson, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Alpana Gowda, M.D., Clinical Instructor Meredith Barad, M.D., Clinical Instructor Mike Brook, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Michael Leong, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Einar Ottestad, M.D., Clinical Instructor Stephen Coleman, M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor Jiang-Ti Kong, M.D., Clinical Instructor
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Structure and Function of Breathing
    CHAPTERCONTENTS The structure-function continuum 1 Multiple Influences: biomechanical, biochemical and psychological 1 The structure and Homeostasis and heterostasis 2 OBJECTIVE AND METHODS 4 function of breathing NORMAL BREATHING 5 Respiratory benefits 5 Leon Chaitow The upper airway 5 Dinah Bradley Thenose 5 The oropharynx 13 The larynx 13 Pathological states affecting the airways 13 Normal posture and other structural THE STRUCTURE-FUNCTION considerations 14 Further structural considerations 15 CONTINUUM Kapandji's model 16 Nowhere in the body is the axiom of structure Structural features of breathing 16 governing function more apparent than in its Lung volumes and capacities 19 relation to respiration. This is also a region in Fascla and resplrstory function 20 which prolonged modifications of function - Thoracic spine and ribs 21 Discs 22 such as the inappropriate breathing pattern dis- Structural features of the ribs 22 played during hyperventilation - inevitably intercostal musculature 23 induce structural changes, for example involving Structural features of the sternum 23 Posterior thorax 23 accessory breathing muscles as well as the tho- Palpation landmarks 23 racic articulations. Ultimately, the self-perpetuat- NEURAL REGULATION OF BREATHING 24 ing cycle of functional change creating structural Chemical control of breathing 25 modification leading to reinforced dysfunctional Voluntary control of breathing 25 tendencies can become complete, from The autonomic nervous system 26 whichever direction dysfunction arrives, for Sympathetic division 27 Parasympathetic division 27 example: structural adaptations can prevent NANC system 28 normal breathing function, and abnormal breath- THE MUSCLES OF RESPIRATION 30 ing function ensures continued structural adap- Additional soft tissue influences and tational stresses leading to decompensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebral Column and Thorax
    Introduction to Human Osteology Chapter 4: Vertebral Column and Thorax Roberta Hall Kenneth Beals Holm Neumann Georg Neumann Gwyn Madden Revised in 1978, 1984, and 2008 The Vertebral Column and Thorax Sternum Manubrium – bone that is trapezoidal in shape, makes up the superior aspect of the sternum. Jugular notch – concave notches on either side of the superior aspect of the manubrium, for articulation with the clavicles. Corpus or body – flat, rectangular bone making up the major portion of the sternum. The lateral aspects contain the notches for the true ribs, called the costal notches. Xiphoid process – variably shaped bone found at the inferior aspect of the corpus. Process may fuse late in life to the corpus. Clavicle Sternal end – rounded end, articulates with manubrium. Acromial end – flat end, articulates with scapula. Conoid tuberosity – muscle attachment located on the inferior aspect of the shaft, pointing posteriorly. Ribs Scapulae Head Ventral surface Neck Dorsal surface Tubercle Spine Shaft Coracoid process Costal groove Acromion Glenoid fossa Axillary margin Medial angle Vertebral margin Manubrium. Left anterior aspect, right posterior aspect. Sternum and Xyphoid Process. Left anterior aspect, right posterior aspect. Clavicle. Left side. Top superior and bottom inferior. First Rib. Left superior and right inferior. Second Rib. Left inferior and right superior. Typical Rib. Left inferior and right superior. Eleventh Rib. Left posterior view and left superior view. Twelfth Rib. Top shows anterior view and bottom shows posterior view. Scapula. Left side. Top anterior and bottom posterior. Scapula. Top lateral and bottom superior. Clavicle Sternum Scapula Ribs Vertebrae Body - Development of the vertebrae can be used in aging of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 the Thorax ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 2 ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 3
    ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 1 Part 1 The Thorax ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 2 ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 3 Surface anatomy and surface markings The experienced clinician spends much of his working life relating the surface anatomy of his patients to their deep structures (Fig. 1; see also Figs. 11 and 22). The following bony prominences can usually be palpated in the living subject (corresponding vertebral levels are given in brackets): •◊◊superior angle of the scapula (T2); •◊◊upper border of the manubrium sterni, the suprasternal notch (T2/3); •◊◊spine of the scapula (T3); •◊◊sternal angle (of Louis) — the transverse ridge at the manubrio-sternal junction (T4/5); •◊◊inferior angle of scapula (T8); •◊◊xiphisternal joint (T9); •◊◊lowest part of costal margin—10th rib (the subcostal line passes through L3). Note from Fig. 1 that the manubrium corresponds to the 3rd and 4th thoracic vertebrae and overlies the aortic arch, and that the sternum corre- sponds to the 5th to 8th vertebrae and neatly overlies the heart. Since the 1st and 12th ribs are difficult to feel, the ribs should be enu- merated from the 2nd costal cartilage, which articulates with the sternum at the angle of Louis. The spinous processes of all the thoracic vertebrae can be palpated in the midline posteriorly, but it should be remembered that the first spinous process that can be felt is that of C7 (the vertebra prominens). The position of the nipple varies considerably in the female, but in the male it usually lies in the 4th intercostal space about 4in (10cm) from the midline.
    [Show full text]
  • ADESIONE ALLE TERAPIE a LUNGO TERMINE Problemi E Possibili Soluzioni
    ADESIONE ALLE TERAPIE A LUNGO TERMINE problemi e possibili soluzioni Published by the World Health Organization in 2003 under the title Adherence to long term therapies: Evidence for action © World Health Organization 2003 The Director-General of the World Health Organization has granted translation rights for an edition in Italian to Critical Medicine Publishing s.r.l., which is solely responsible for the italian edition. Edizione italiana a cura di E. Grossi Tutti i diritti riservati. Nessuna parte di questa pubblicazione può essere riprodotta o trasmessa in alcuna forma o con alcun mezzo, compresa la registrazione o le fotocopie, senza il permesso scritto dell’editore. © 2006 - Critical Medicine Publishing Editore 00143 Roma - Via G. Squarcina, 3 - Tel. 06.51951.1 www.cmpedizioni.it Realizzazione grafica e stampa: Istituto Arti Grafiche Mengarelli - Roma ISBN 88-88415-25-4 Questa pubblicazione, realizzata con la collaborazione di Bracco S.p.A. è offerta in omaggio ai sigg. Medici Indice Sezione I Disegnare lo scenario 19 Capitolo I Definire il concetto di adesione ai trattamenti 21 Capitolo II Le dimensioni del problema della scarsa adesione ai trattamenti 27 Capitolo III Come può la scarsa adesione ai trattamenti interessare politici e manager della sanità? 31 SEZIONE II Migliorare l’adesione ai trattamenti: una guida per i paesi 37 Capitolo IV Le lezioni apprese 39 Capitolo V Verso la soluzione 51 Capitolo VI Come può il miglioramento dell’adesione ai trattamenti tradursi in benefici economici e per la salute? 71 SEZIONE III Review
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Injectate Spread and Nerve
    Journal name: Journal of Pain Research Article Designation: Original Research Year: 2018 Volume: 11 Journal of Pain Research Dovepress Running head verso: Baek et al Running head recto: Ultrasound-guided GON block open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S17269 Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Comparing the injectate spread and nerve involvement between different injectate volumes for ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block at the C2 level: a cadaveric evaluation In Chan Baek1 Purpose: The spread patterns between different injectate volumes have not yet been investigated Kyungeun Park1 in ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve (GON) block at the C2 level. This cadaveric study Tae Lim Kim1 was undertaken to compare the spread pattern and nerve involvements of different volumes of Jehoon O2 dye using this technique. Hun-Mu Yang2,* Materials and methods: After randomization, ultrasound-guided GON blocks with 1 or 5 mL dye solution were performed at the C2 level on the right or left side of five fresh cadavers. The Shin Hyung Kim1,* suboccipital regions were dissected, and nerve involvement was investigated. 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Results: Ten injections were successfully completed. In all cases of 5 mL dye, we observed the Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University deeply stained posterior neck muscles, including the suboccipital triangle space. The suboccipital College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic and third occipital nerves, in addition to GONs, were consistently stained when 5-mL dye was 2 of Korea; Department of Anatomy, used in all injections (100%). Although all GONs were successfully stained in the 1-mL dye Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea cases, three of five injections (60%) concomitantly stained the third occipital nerves.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Data Mining Reveals Analgesic Effects of Lapatinib in Cancer Patients
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Clinical data mining reveals analgesic efects of lapatinib in cancer patients Shuo Zhou1,2, Fang Zheng1,2* & Chang‑Guo Zhan1,2* Microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase 1 (mPGES‑1) is recognized as a promising target for a next generation of anti‑infammatory drugs that are not expected to have the side efects of currently available anti‑infammatory drugs. Lapatinib, an FDA‑approved drug for cancer treatment, has recently been identifed as an mPGES‑1 inhibitor. But the efcacy of lapatinib as an analgesic remains to be evaluated. In the present clinical data mining (CDM) study, we have collected and analyzed all lapatinib‑related clinical data retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov. Our CDM utilized a meta‑analysis protocol, but the clinical data analyzed were not limited to the primary and secondary outcomes of clinical trials, unlike conventional meta‑analyses. All the pain‑related data were used to determine the numbers and odd ratios (ORs) of various forms of pain in cancer patients with lapatinib treatment. The ORs, 95% confdence intervals, and P values for the diferences in pain were calculated and the heterogeneous data across the trials were evaluated. For all forms of pain analyzed, the patients received lapatinib treatment have a reduced occurrence (OR 0.79; CI 0.70–0.89; P = 0.0002 for the overall efect). According to our CDM results, available clinical data for 12,765 patients enrolled in 20 randomized clinical trials indicate that lapatinib therapy is associated with a signifcant reduction in various forms of pain, including musculoskeletal pain, bone pain, headache, arthralgia, and pain in extremity, in cancer patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 Fractures of the Upper Thoracic Spine: Approaches and Surgical Management
    Chapter 21 Fractures of the Upper Thoracic Spine: Approaches and Surgical Management Sean D Christie, M.D., John Song, M.D., and Richard G Fessler, M.D., Ph.D. INTRODUCTION Fractures occurring in the thoracic region account for approximately 17 to 23% of all traumatic spinal fractures (1), with 22% of traumatic spinal fractures occurring between T1 and T4 (16). More than half of these fractures result in neurological injury, and almost three-quarters of those impaired suffer from complete paralysis. Obtaining surgical access to the anterior vertebral elements of the upper thoracic vertebrae (T1–T6) presents a unique anatomic challenge. The thoracic cage, which narrows significantly as it approaches the thoracic inlet, has an intimate association between the vertebral column and the superior mediastinal structures. The supraclavicular, transmanubrial, transthoracic, and lateral parascapular extrapleural approaches each provide access to the anterior vertebral elements of the upper thoracic vertebrae. However, each of these approaches has distinct advantages and disadvantages and their use should be tailored to each individual patient’s situation. This chapter reviews these surgical approaches. Traditional posterior approaches are illustrated in Figure 21.1, but will not be discussed in depth here. ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND STABILITY The upper thoracic spine possesses unique anatomic and biomechanical properties. The anterior aspects of the vertebral bodies are smaller than the posterior aspects, which contribute to the physiological kyphosis present in this region of the spine. Furthermore, this orientation results in a ventrally positioned axis of rotation, predisposing this region to compression injuries. The combination and interaction of the vertebral bodies, ribs, and sternum increase the inherent biomechanical stability of this segment of the spine to 2 to 3 times that of the thoracolumbar junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Polyarthritis for the Primary Care Physician
    24 Osteopathic Family Physician (2018) 24 - 31 Osteopathic Family Physician | Volume 10, No. 5 | September / October, 2018 REVIEW ARTICLE Approach to Polyarthritis for the Primary Care Physician Arielle Freilich, DO, PGY2 & Helaine Larsen, DO Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, New York KEYWORDS: Complaints of joint pain are commonly seen in clinical practice. Primary care physicians are frequently the frst practitioners to work up these complaints. Polyarthritis can be seen in a multitude of diseases. It Polyarthritis can be a challenging diagnostic process. In this article, we review the approach to diagnosing polyarthritis Synovitis joint pain in the primary care setting. Starting with history and physical, we outline the defning characteristics of various causes of arthralgia. We discuss the use of certain laboratory studies including Joint Pain sedimentation rate, antinuclear antibody, and rheumatoid factor. Aspiration of synovial fuid is often required for diagnosis, and we discuss the interpretation of possible results. Primary care physicians can Rheumatic Disease initiate the evaluation of polyarthralgia, and this article outlines a diagnostic approach. Rheumatology INTRODUCTION PATIENT HISTORY Polyarticular joint pain is a common complaint seen Although laboratory studies can shed much light on a possible diagnosis, a in primary care practices. The diferential diagnosis detailed history and physical examination remain crucial in the evaluation is extensive, thus making the diagnostic process of polyarticular symptoms. The vast diferential for polyarticular pain can difcult. A comprehensive history and physical exam be greatly narrowed using a thorough history. can help point towards the more likely etiology of the complaint. The physician must frst ensure that there are no symptoms pointing towards a more serious Emergencies diagnosis, which may require urgent management or During the initial evaluation, the physician must frst exclude any life- referral.
    [Show full text]
  • Provocative Discography 4 5 Irina Melnik , Richard Derby , and Ray M
    Provocative Discography 4 5 Irina Melnik , Richard Derby , and Ray M. Baker Key Points • Technical challenges, potential complications, and • Discography is an invasive diagnostic procedure interpretation mistakes can be avoided with proper not intended to be an initial screening examination selection of patients, including favorable psycho- due to associated potential risk to a patient. logical pro fi ling, use of sterile technique, intravenous • It is a con fi rmatory test, which can reveal the true and intradiscal antibiotics, judicious use of sedation, source of pain and thus leads to precise and effec- and good technical training of a practitioner. tive treatment as well as might help patients to avoid • Emerging alternative approaches including anes- unnecessary surgical interventions. thetic discography and functional discography are • The value of the test is not only in providing morpho- gaining attention, as well as noninvasive MRI spec- logic characteristics of the disc structure and degrees troscopy and other imaging tests, as an attempt to of internal annular disc disrupture but also in providing provide similar clinical information without putting unique clinical information by potentially evoking patients at a potential short- or long-term risk. patients typical/concordant pain and con fi rming a speci fi c level of the painful disc. • As a provocative test, discography is liable to false- positive results, which can be potentially avoided Introduction by adherence to strict operational standards and interpretation criteria, including pain ³ 7/10, pres- Discography was introduced in the 1940s to diagnose her- sure <50 psi a.o. , concordant pain, ³ grade 3 annu- niation and internal annular disruption of the lumbar and lar tear, volume £ 3.5 mL, and the presence of a subsequently cervical and thoracic intervertebral discs [ 1, 2 ] .
    [Show full text]
  • Pathological Cause of Low Back Pain in a Patient Seen Through Direct Margaret M
    Pathological Cause of Low Back Pain in a Patient Seen through Direct Margaret M. Gebhardt PT, DPT, OCS Access in a Physical Therapy Clinic: A Case Report Staff Physical Therapist, Motion Stability, LLC, and Adjunct Clinical Faculty, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA ABSTRACT cal therapists primarily treat patients that sporadic.9 Deyo and Diehl6 found that the Background and Purpose: A 66-year- fall into the mechanical LBP category, but 4 clinical findings with the highest positive old male presented directly to a physical need to be aware that although infrequent, likelihood ratios for detecting the presence therapy clinic with complaints of low back 7% to 8% of LBP complaints are due to of cancer in LBP were: a previous history of pain (LBP). The purpose of this case report is nonmechanical spinal conditions or visceral cancer, failure to improve with conservative to describe the clinical reasoning that led to disease.5 Malignant neoplasms are the most medical treatment in the past month, an age a medical referral for a patient not respond- common of the nonmechanical spinal con- of at least 50 years or older, and unexplained ing to conservative treatment that ultimately ditions causing LBP, but comprise less than weight loss of more than 4.5 kg in 6 months led to the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. 1% of all total LBP conditions.6 (Table 1).10 In Deyo and Diehl’s6 study, they Methods: Data was collected during the In this era of autonomous practice, analyzed 1975 patients that presented with course of the patient’s treatment in an out- increasing numbers of physical therapists are LBP and found 13 to have cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoulder Anatomy & Clinical Exam
    MSK Ultrasound - Spine - Incheon Terminal Orthopedic Private Clinic Yong-Hyun, Yoon C,T-spine Basic Advanced • Medial branch block • C-spine transforaminal block • Facet joint block • Thoracic paravertebral block • C-spine intra-discal injection • Superficial cervical plexus block • Vagus nerve block • Greater occipital nerve block(GON) • Third occipital nerve block(TON) • Hydrodissection • Brachial plexus(1st rib level) • Suboccipital nerve • Stellate ganglion block(SGB) • C1, C2 nerve root, C2 nerve • Brachial plexus block(interscalene) • Recurrent laryngeal nerve • Serratus anterior plane • Cervical nerve root Cervical facet joint Anatomy Diagnosis Cervical facet joint injection C-arm Ultrasound Cervical medial branch Anatomy Nerve innervation • Medial branch • Same level facet joint • Inferior level facet joint • Facet joint • Dual nerve innervation Cervical medial branch C-arm Ultrasound Cervical nerve root Anatomy Diagnosis • Motor • Sensory • Dermatome, myotome, fasciatome Cervical nerve root block C-arm Ultrasound Stallete ganglion block Anatomy Injection Vagus nerve Anatomy Injection L,S-spine Basic Advanced • Medial branch block • Lumbar sympathetic block • Facet joint block • Lumbar plexus block • Superior, inferior hypogastric nerve block • Caudal block • Transverse abdominal plane(TAP) block • Sacral plexus block • Epidural block • Hydrodissection • Interlaminal • Pudendal nerve • Transforaminal injection • Genitofemoral nerve • Superior, inferior cluneal nerve • Rectus abdominal sheath • Erector spinae plane Lumbar facet
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Withdrawal ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 15 Mark S
    Magdalena Anitescu Honorio T. Benzon Mark S. Wallace Editors Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine 123 Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine Magdalena Anitescu Honorio T. Benzon • Mark S. Wallace Editors Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine Editors Magdalena Anitescu Honorio T. Benzon Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Department of Anesthesiology University of Chicago Medicine Northwestern University Chicago, IL Feinberg School of Medicine USA Chicago, IL USA Mark S. Wallace Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology University of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla, CL USA ISBN 978-3-319-60070-3 ISBN 978-3-319-60072-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017960332 © Springer International Publishing AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]