DOCSLIB.ORG

Doncaster Local Plan 2018 Draft Policies & Proposed Sites Consultation Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doncaster Local Plan 2018 Draft Policies & Proposed Sites Consultation Summary Doncaster Local Plan 2018 Draft Policies & Proposed Sites Consultation Summary www.doncaster.gov.uk Draft Policies & Proposed Sites Consultation – September 2018 Summary of Comments Received & DMBC Responses Scope of Consultation The draft Local Plan policies (73 in total) were published as part of a Policy document for comments to be provided, although the scope only included the policies themselves as opposed to any supporting/explanatory text. The vast majority of the supporting evidence base for the Local Plan was also published at the same time, such as the Phase 3 Green Belt Review, Economic Forecasting and Housing Needs Assessment, Viability Testing and so forth. The Interim Sustainability Appraisal (SA) was also published for comments. A consultation booklet asking a number of specific questions in respect to both the policies and evidence base/SA was made available alongside a response form, although comments were accepted in whatever format they were returned. One of the main aspects of the consultation was in respect to site allocations for housing, employment and minerals sites in order to meet the development needs of the borough over the plan period. The consultation identified sufficient housing sites to deliver the housing target of 920 net new homes per year over the plan period to 2032 (15,640 new homes) and a plan period employment land requirement of 407 hectares to ensure sufficient land is identified to grow the economy by 1% per annum in line with the Sheffield City Region Strategic Economic Plan; Housing sites were proposed in line with the Settlement Hierarchy and distribution around the borough approved previously for consultation by Full Council in spring 2016, and in accordance with national planning policy in respect to Green Belt and flood risk. The housing that could be expected to be built on the sites shown in the consultation totalled 17,481 new homes (+1,841 houses compared to the 15,640 target, or an annual average of 1,028 compared to the 920). Of this total: 11% (1,960 new homes) of the sites being proposed to be allocated were within the Green Belt; 18% (3,090 new homes) of the sites being proposed to be allocated were currently designated as Countryside Policy Area; The Local Plan will also allocate some very large sites (e.g. Unity) which may not all be complete before 2032, but the entire site is being allocated and could be built if the market supports higher than average sales/completions. These sites provided an additional housing potential of 3,047 new homes. Sufficient land was therefore being proposed to be allocated in the Local Plan for 20,528 new homes, or 1,208 new homes per year. This figure is not a minimum for new housing either because a Local Plan site allocation is not the only way that housing will come forward. For example, additional housing will be provided from windfall development (sites not allocated in the local plan) or permissions from the smaller villages which are excluded from the above figures. Of the 209 sites proposed to be allocated for housing in the Local Plan, 80% (168 sites) were on smaller/medium sized sites (less than 100 houses) which would be of interest to the smaller and 1 medium sized builders. Additional housing (up to 1,200 new homes) at the Airport was also subject to the consultation which would all be additional supply to the numbers set out above and the majority of this is conditional on the basis of significant job creation being delivered in and around the Airport first and foremost; Large employment site allocations were proposed at the Airport, Carcroft Common and at Bradholme, Thorne. Other employment sites subject to existing permission will also contribute towards the employment land requirement such as at Askern (former Saw Mills); Armthorpe (Westmoor Park and Hatfield Lane); Hatfield-Stainforth (Unity); and, Rossington (Iport). 2 minerals sites were also proposed via the consultation. All of the consultation material is still available to view via: www.doncaster.gov.uk/localplan Summary of Consultation Approach/Techniques Informal consultation ran for a period of just over 6 weeks (Thursday 13th September to Friday 26th October 2018). Everybody on the Local Plan database (circa 2,500 contacts) received notification via e-mail. The Council’s Communications Team put out press releases and ran articles on social media (e.g. Facebook/Twitter) which were re-tweeted/posted by the Council’s Planning Team. Members of the Local Plans Team met all DMBC Ward Members and attended circa 15 Town/Parish Councils Meetings during the consultation period. A number of internal meetings were held with DMBC stakeholders as well as some external bodies (e.g. Education, CPRE). Officers attended Business Doncaster Property Forum to present. Proposed sites (excluding those that already had planning permission) had site notices posted around the site to publicise the consultation. Overall Response A total of around 1,200 separate responses were received following the close of the consultation, broadly broken down as follows: 927 x Individual letters/e-mails/completed response forms; 265 x Standard letters objecting to proposed sites; 4 x Petitions objecting to proposed sites. This is a significantly larger response compared to previous comparable consultations. Around 700 (or 58%) of responses received were from ‘new customers’ (including agents/developers and individuals) who have not engaged with the local plan so far. Broadly, the responses can be broken down as follows: Individuals/Members of the Public/Communities = 980; Landowners/Developers/Agents = 142; Infrastructure Providers = 10; Statutory Consultees = 3; Neighbouring/SCR Local Planning Authorities = 6; DMBC Ward Members = 11; Town/Parish Councils = 21; Internal DMBC Stakeholders = 8; External Stakeholders = 15 (e.g. Sheffield City Region Combined Authority/Campaign to Protect Rural England). 2 At the end of the consultation, the DMBC Facebook post/article had reached 20,812 people which resulted in 155 comments being posted (additional to the above figures) and was shared by 103 people. The post resulted in 2,197 ‘clicks’ through to the local plan consultation part of DMBC’s website. A number of individuals felt that they should have been contacted by letter and that the publicity was not sufficient given the importance of the consultation and some suggest DMBC have deliberately tried to progress the plan without undertaking proper consultation. Summary of Responses Broadly, the responses received relate to the following areas: Vision & Objectives – 91 separate consultees have commented on the draft Vision & Objectives for the local plan – most are broadly supportive of these although a number identify allocations as being in conflict with certain individual objectives in relation to protection of countryside/Green Belt etc; Draft Policies - 142 separate consultees have commented on the 73 draft local plan policies making 753 separate comments. The policies that have attracted the highest number of comments being (Policy 2: Spatial Strategy and Settlement Hierarchy x 66 comments; Policy 3: Level and Distribution of Growth x 58 comments; Policy 6: Housing Allocations x 39 comments; and, Policy 29: Open Space Provision in New Developments x 32 comments). Every policy received at least one comment. Proposed/Rejected Sites – This was the part of the consultation that by far attracted the highest level of response. 592 people made comments in respect to housing sites, and 188 people commented in respect to employment sites: o Housing - The vast majority of the responses to the consultation were from our residents and communities and focussed on proposed housing sites and are generally raising objections for various reasons which have been summarised as part of this report. The summary focuses on the sites which received the highest numbers of responses, although as per Planning Applications it is not the number of responses received but the material Planning considerations raised by them that can have the largest influence on whether changes to the plan should be made. It should be noted that some of the objections do not relate to material planning matters but have still been summarised and set out as they are nevertheless important issues and concerns for people locally. In general, objections have been received to virtually all the proposed housing sites on land currently designated as Green Belt or Countryside, although other urban sites have also attracted objections including sites already allocated for housing in the Unitary Development Plan and Brownfield sites; o Employment Sites - There were very few comments in relation to the proposed employment sites with the exception of both the proposed (Ref: 160 Bradholme) and rejected (Ref:001 Thorne North J6) sites at Thorne; a summary of employment sites feedback is set out in this report. Housing Growth at Thorne & Moorends - 43 x individual responses (including the Thorne & Moorends Neighbourhood Plan Group) to the consultation objecting to the emerging Local Plan and its policy approach to future housing development at Thorne-Moorends. In summary, the comments were that avoidance of flood risk is not a reason to curtail future 3 growth and much needed regeneration in the area as flood risk is something that can be mitigated rather than avoided; Sustainability Appraisal – 18 people commented on the supporting Sustainability Appraisal Report, including all of the Statutory Consultees. Other evidence base documents also attracted a number of people commenting, including the Green Belt Review (61 people), Economic Forecasting & Housing Needs Report (44 people) and Settlement Background Paper (42 people). New Sites or revised site boundaries Following the close of the consultation, a total of 64 new or revised site boundaries were put to the Council for consideration. Of these, 55 were considered as being reasonable options (i.e. sites that have potential to be allocated in line with the preferred strategy) and therefore required to be assessed and considered through the Publication version of the Local Plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taylor Woodrow Plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our Aim Is to Be the Homebuilder of Choice
    Taylor Woodrow plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our aim is to be the homebuilder of choice. Our primary business is the development of sustainable communities of high-quality homes in selected markets in the UK, North America, Spain and Gibraltar. We seek to add shareholder value through the achievement of profitable growth and effective capital management. Contents 01 Group Financial Highlights 54 Consolidated Cash Flow 02 Chairman’s Statement Statement 05 Chief Executive’s Review 55 Notes to the Consolidated 28 Board of Directors Financial Statements 30 Report of the Directors 79 Independent Auditors’ Report 33 Corporate Governance Statement 80 Accounting Policies 37 Directors’ Remuneration Report 81 Company Balance Sheet 46 Directors’ Responsibilities 82 Notes to the Company Financial Statement Statements 47 Independent Auditors’ Report 87 Particulars of Principal Subsidiary 48 Accounting Policies Undertakings 51 Consolidated Income Statement 88 Five Year Review 52 Consolidated Statement of 90 Shareholder Facilities Recognised Income and Expense 92 Principal Taylor Woodrow Offices 53 Consolidated Balance Sheet Group Financial Highlights • Group revenues £3.68bn (2005: £3.56bn) • Housing profit from operations* £469m (2005: £456m) • Profit before tax £406m (2005: £411m) • Basic earnings per share 50.5 pence (2005: 50.6 pence) • Full year dividend 14.75 pence (2005: 13.4 pence) • Net gearing 18.6 per cent (2005: 23.7 per cent) • Equity shareholders’ funds per share 364.7 pence (2005: 338.4 pence) Profit before tax £m 2006 405.6 2005 411.0 2004 403.9 Full year dividend pence (Represents interim dividends declared and paid and final dividend for the year as declared by the Board) 2006 14.75 2005 13.4 2004 11.1 Equity shareholders’ funds per share pence 2006 364.7 2005 338.4 2004 303.8 * Profit from operations is before joint ventures’ interest and tax (see Note 3, page 56).
    [Show full text]
  • Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020)
    Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020) MAP/LOT OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PROP LOCATION I01/ 1/ / / LEAVITT, DONALD M & PAINE, TODD S 828 PARK AV BALTIMORE MD 21201 55 PINE ISLAND I01/ 1/A / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 54 PINE ISLAND I01/ 2/ / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 51 PINE ISLAND I01/ 3/ / / YOUNG, CHARLES FAMILY TRUST 401 STATE ST UNIT M501 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801 49 PINE ISLAND I01/ 4/ / / SALZMAN FAMILY REALTY TRUST 45-B GREEN ST JAMAICA PLAIN MA 02130 46 PINE ISLAND I01/ 5/ / / STONE FAMILY TRUST 36 VILLAGE RD APT 506 MIDDLETON MA 01949 43 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/ / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 41 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/A / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/B / / KERNER, GERALD 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 38 PINE ISLAND I01/ 7/ / / KERNER, LOUISE G 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 36 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 23 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/B / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 26 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/C / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 33 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/ / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 21 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 17 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/B / / FLYNN, MICHAEL P & LOUISE E 16 PINE ISLAND MEREDITH NH
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes an Outstanding Finance Director?
    what makes an outstanding finance director? “ Right now as an FD, you can have a major impact – and if you don’t seize the moment they’ll find somebody else who will.” Steve Marshall, Chair, Balfour Beatty Plc In association with Directorbank Group Directorbank Group Comprising two market-leading brands, Hanson Green and Directorbank, the Directorbank Group offers a complete range of board level recruitment solutions to the full spectrum of companies from private equity backed businesses and family firms to FTSE and AIM listed organisations. Finance Director appointments are delivered by search consultants with many years experience in this specialist market. Directorbank is a leading provider of executive, Hanson Green is a specialist board practice Grant Thornton UK LLP is a leading financial and business adviser, operating non-executive and interim directors with a search firm with a market leading position in out of 28 offices. Led by 215 partners and employing nearly 4,000 of the market-leading position in the private equity the appointment of chairman and non-executive profession’s brightest minds, we provide personalised assurance, tax and sector. directors and a respected executive search specialist advisory services to over 40,000 individuals, privately-held practice. businesses and public interest entities. More than 70 leading private equity houses from across Europe retain Directorbank’s Hanson Green’s proven track record of solving Our offer to the market is great depth of expertise, delivered in a distinctive services to gain access to their exceptional clients’ recruitment challenges, combined with and personal way. Through proactive, client-centric relationships, our teams network of top level board directors for their the unrivalled quality of their service, has made deliver solutions to problems, not pre-packaged products and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoopla Terms and Conditions
    Zoopla Terms And Conditions Genteel and forty Tadeas never ameliorating whene'er when Miguel abutting his suborner. Self-fulfilling and enjoyable Erhard often double-stopped some glance elementally or dons somberly. African Berke submitted some stand-by after inseverable Er accompanied holus-bolus. Include advertising or solicitor to a few people into reconsidering what is or alan knew alan and try to evaluate the conditions and zoopla terms and Zoopla kicks private landlord listings off internet LandlordZONE. IME Property Joins The Ranks Of Zoopla IME DJK Group Ltd. Member mentor and Conditions Zoopla. Possible and social distancing rules made valuations and viewings impossible. But ensure me forget you a conclusion or your least how I see this situation. Zoopla Limited is an appointed representative of Loans Warehouse Limited which is. Zoopla Terms people Use Zoopla. That this is equity release right to set a and zoopla terms of! Happen Digital Case Studies Helping Zoopla explain its. Zoopla is the UK's most comprehensive property website focused on. Definitions In these construction Terms and Conditions the following definitions shall apply Agent means an estate agent lettings agent and in Scotland. If children wish to fully delete your expand and sensible of its associated information please contact Customer bill You change either email helpzooplacouk or click Submit event request below and displace the contact form only're sorry we see a go. Term investment story including the eventual recovery of lost market. Zoopla london sale Francis Farm. 55000 Offers in region of pump For level by auction Terms and conditions apply In children there got another peg that can jail a managers flat This.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory and Five Year Housing Land Supply
    Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory and Five Year Housing Land Supply Annex Published 1 November 2019 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... i Notes .................................................................................................................................... ii A1. Evidence of Lead-In Times, Lapse Rates, Build Out Rates and Windfalls ............... 1 Lead-in Times for sites of 10 dwellings or more (net) ......................................................... 1 Build Out Rates for sites of 10 dwellings or more (net) .................................................... 15 Lapse Rates (or Non-Implementation Rates) ................................................................... 34 A2. Completed Questionnaires and Emails .................................................................... 41 i Notes The Councils have prepared this document so that it is compliant with the website accessibility requirements where possible; however some sections of this document as published, such as the completed questionnaires in this document, are not website accessibility compliant. If you would like any sections of this document to made accessible, please contact the Planning Policy, Strategy and Economy Team by email: [email protected] or phone: 01954 713183. ii A1. Evidence of Lead-In Times, Lapse Rates, Build Out Rates and Windfalls A1.1. The Councils have developed typical assumptions for lead-in times, build out
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Transactions Over £500 Jul-15 Directotate Service Supplier Order Invoice Line Value (N
    Darlington Borough Council - Analysis of Transactions Over £500 Jul-15 Invoice Line Value (net of Directotate Service Supplier Order Account VAT) Resources Group Resources ASSOCIATION OF NORTH EAST COUNCILS LTD 0 25,873.00 Subscriptions Resources Group Resources ASSOCIATION OF NORTH EAST COUNCILS LTD 0 7,500.00 Subscriptions Resources Group Resources DE-POEL 0 620.94 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources DE-POEL 0 581.64 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources DE-POEL 0 578.97 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources DE-POEL 0 606.48 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources ICO 3069654 500.00 Professional Fees & Consultancy Resources Group Resources JOHN WORRALL 3070290 500.00 Professional Fees & Consultancy Resources Group Resources KATE DODDS 3070258 2,200.00 Professional Fees & Consultancy Resources Group Resources KATE DODDS 3070259 4,175.00 Professional Fees & Consultancy Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3069451 1,496.25 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3069451 1,487.50 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3069451 1,513.75 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3069451 1,408.75 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3067564 1,136.00 Agency Staff Costs - Non Teaching Resources Group Resources MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 3067564 528.00 Agency
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Ashtead Group plc Annual Report & Accounts 2014 THIS IS WHAT WE DO Annual Report & Accounts 2014 WATNEY ISMA Sunbelt Who we ArE Ashtead is an international equipment rental company with national networks in the US and the UK. We rent a full range of construction and industrial equipment across a wide variety of applications to a diverse customer base. Our objective is to deliver sustainable value and above average performance across the economic cycle, thereby extending our industry- leading position and delivering superior total returns for shareholders. Ashtead Group plc Annual Report & Accounts 2014 1 OUR FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Contents This is Ashtead 2 Strategic report Strategic Strategic report £1,635m £409m Chairman’s statement 4 Highlights of the year 5 Revenue Underlying operating profit Our business model 6 Strategic review The strategy behind what we do 10 1,635 409 Our markets 10 Our strategic priorities 14 Key performance indicators 18 1,362 290 Principal risks and uncertainties 20 1,135 Financial review 22 Responsible business report 28 181 949 837 99 69 Directors’ report Directors 38 Corporate governance report 40 10 11 12 13 14 10 11 12 13 14 Audit Committee report 43 Nomination Committee report 45 Remuneration report 46 £362m £357m Other statutory disclosures 59 Statement of directors’ Underlying profit Profit before taxation responsibilities 61 before taxation 362 357 245 214 Our financial statements 2014 Independent auditor’s report 63 Consolidated income statement 65 131 135 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Action Group Meeting Thursday 18Th May 2021, Online Date
    Climate Action Group Meeting Thursday 18th May 2021, online Date: Thursday 18th March 2021, online Attendees: Martin Gettings (Canary Wharf Group) James Cadman (Action Sustainability), Stefania Chica-Jacome (Action Sustainability), Tony Vozniak (Ardent Hire), Sarah-Jane Davies (Sisk), Lucy Neville (Transport for London), William McDowell (Brett Martin), Scott Gregory (Morgan Sindall), Michelle McAteer (Balfour Beatty), Katherine Rusack (Balfour Beatty), James Geraghty (Kier), Jamie Bursnell (Bellway Homes), Stephen Weldon (Bellway Homes), Anna Shillitoe (CHAS), Jonathan Ayton (Willmott Dixon), Amy Twist (Countryside Properties), Maria Gkonou (Redrow Homes), Sila Danik Dirihan (Saint Gobain), Sarah Burki (Interserve), Oana Caltia (Kilnbridge), Natalie Wilkinson (NG Bailey), Rebecca Segal (NG Bailey), Stewart Jones (Hanson Biz), Gigi Kvashilava (Hanson Biz), Kirsty Dunne (Osborne), Gemma Tovey (Lovell Partnership) Summary of Actions and Notes from the Climate Action Group Meeting Climate Action Group – Introductions and outstanding actions No Action/Notes Owner 1 Welcome and Intros Martin Gettings & James Cadman 2 Update on Progress: engagement and tool use, support available. We gave an overview of where we are now in terms of engagement. Stefania Chica- • There are 197 participating companies between partners and Jacome suppliers: 32% are Partner organizations and the remaining 68% are suppliers. • Partner organisations: 56% are actively engaging with the group. This is a 3% increase versus the last group meeting in March 2021. • Supplier organisations: 55% are actively engaging. • School continues to provide monthly webinars to support suppliers. Next session is on the 26th May, please forward invites to suppliers. Partners Contact [email protected] for further details. 3 What’s coming. • E-learning modules: The School will be publishing modules 1 (Climate Change & Carbon) & 2 (Carbon Footprinting and Measurement) on School the website this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Carillion Plc: Fake It ‘Til You Break It
    Nova School of Business and Economics & Louvain School of Management A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master’s degree in Finance from the Nova School of Business and Economics and the Master 120 credits in Management, professional focus, from the Louvain School of Management. CARILLION PLC: FAKE IT ‘TIL YOU BREAK IT PATRÍCIA MARIA MARTINS SANTOS 26161 Work Project carried out under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho 01-05-2020 Carillion PLC: Fake It ‘Til You Break It Abstract The case “Carillion PLC: Fake It ‘Til You Break It” explores the recent collapse of Carillion, the second largest constructor in the United Kingdom, marking the largest trading liquidation known to date in the country. By exposing the company’s history from its start to its demise, the case looks into the specificities of operating the construction industry, as well as Carillion’s M&A activity, international expansion, bidding approach and financial policy. Emphasis is further given to the Corporate Governance issues that guided the company’s downfall. The supporting teaching note guides the analysis of the case, touching on several aspects related to Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance including: (i) the risk of overvaluation of companies and synergies in the context of M&A; (ii) pros and cons of debt issuance and the effects of operating under high leverage; and (iii) effectiveness of Corporate Governance entities, namely the Board of Directors, External Advisor and Investors. Keywords: Construction, Acquisitions, Debt, Corporate Governance This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209).
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2019
    Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2019 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Status and Content of this Document ............................................................................................. 2 2 Local Context ................................................................................................................................... 3 3 National Policy ................................................................................................................................ 4 4 Identifying the Housing Requirement - Standard Methodology .................................................... 6 5 Previous Delivery .......................................................................................................................... 10 6 Housing requirement for next five years within County Durham ................................................ 11 7 The supply of Deliverable Sites: Delivering the New Housing Required – Approach to determining the supply of housing ............................................................................................... 12 8 Five Year Supply Calculation ......................................................................................................... 17 9 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 19 10 Monitoring ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHMA Appendix 2 and 3
    Appendix 2 SHMA Engagement Workshops 2a: SHMA and GTAA Duty to Cooperate Meeting; 7 February 2017 1. Invitees: Durham County Council North Tyneside Council Northumberland County Council South Tyneside Council Sunderland City Council 2. Attendees: Nigel Moore – Opinion Research Services Kath Lawless – Newcastle City Council Neil Wilkinson – Gateshead Council Chris Carr – Gateshead Council Emma Warneford- Newcastle City Council Kathy Verlander – Newcastle City Council Neil Cole – North Tyneside Council Anna Milner – South Tyneside Council Mike Allum – Durham County Council Debbie Shanks – Durham County Council Steve Robson – Northumberland County Council 3. Summary: To agree the approach to defining the Housing Market Area (HMA) for Newcastle and Gateshead with Local Authorities. The conclusion was that there are three authorities within the HMA; Newcastle, Gateshead and North Tyneside. It was agreed that Gateshead share a HMA with Newcastle and that Newcastle also share a HMA with North Tyneside. Local Authorities were also updated on the timeline for the preparation of the SHMA. Objectively Assessed Need (OAN) has been examined at North Tyneside Local Plan examination (adoption expected in the summer 2017), and thus it is not necessary to assess North Tyneside’s OAN within the Newcastle and Gateshead SHMA update. No cross boundary issues were raised regarding Newcastle and Gateshead Councils’ planned update of the gypsy, traveller or travelling showman study. 5. Presentation slides: Appendix 2b: SHMA Breakfast Briefing for Developers
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVED Projects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERS Projects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTS Approved projects at main contract awarded stage. Planning authority: Broadland Job: Detailed Midlands, B93 8HB Tel: 01564 773927 Planning authority: Wolverhampton Job: BS8 1AT Contractor: Details Not Available, SKEGNESS £1.7M Detailed Plans Submitted for 69 residential Benton Park Road, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Plans Submitted for training building LEICESTER £0.73M Detail Plans Granted for youth zone Client: Tel: Not Available Skegness Primary School, Part of units Client: Gleeson Homes & Regeneration Tyne & Wear, NE7 7LX Tel: 0191 223 6600 MIDLANDS/ (extension) Client: Jeesal Agent: Frith 114 - 116 Western Road Wolverhampton Youth Zone Developer: H B CORBY £2.4M Lumley Fields Playing, Burgh Road Limited Agent: Gleeson Homes & SHEFFIELD £3M Associates Ltd, 33 Quebec Road, Dereham, Planning authority: Leicester Job: Detail Architects, 17 Warwick Street, Rugby, Parcel R22, Priors Hall Development Churchill Avenue And Regeneration Limited, 3 Lumley Court, Drum Clarkson Osborn International, Globe EAST ANGLIA Norfolk, NR19 2DR Tel: 01362 697201 Plans Granted for 15 flats Client: Westdale Warwickshire, CV21 3DH Tel: 01788 576137 Site, Stamford Road Weldon Planning authority: East Lindsey Job: Detail Industrial Estate, Chester-Le-Street, County Workls, Penistone Road Owlerton NOTTINGHAM £18M Court
    [Show full text]