DOCSLIB.ORG

SHMA Appendix 2 and 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix 2 SHMA Engagement Workshops 2a: SHMA and GTAA Duty to Cooperate Meeting; 7 February 2017 1. Invitees: Durham County Council North Tyneside Council Northumberland County Council South Tyneside Council Sunderland City Council 2. Attendees: Nigel Moore – Opinion Research Services Kath Lawless – Newcastle City Council Neil Wilkinson – Gateshead Council Chris Carr – Gateshead Council Emma Warneford- Newcastle City Council Kathy Verlander – Newcastle City Council Neil Cole – North Tyneside Council Anna Milner – South Tyneside Council Mike Allum – Durham County Council Debbie Shanks – Durham County Council Steve Robson – Northumberland County Council 3. Summary: To agree the approach to defining the Housing Market Area (HMA) for Newcastle and Gateshead with Local Authorities. The conclusion was that there are three authorities within the HMA; Newcastle, Gateshead and North Tyneside. It was agreed that Gateshead share a HMA with Newcastle and that Newcastle also share a HMA with North Tyneside. Local Authorities were also updated on the timeline for the preparation of the SHMA. Objectively Assessed Need (OAN) has been examined at North Tyneside Local Plan examination (adoption expected in the summer 2017), and thus it is not necessary to assess North Tyneside’s OAN within the Newcastle and Gateshead SHMA update. No cross boundary issues were raised regarding Newcastle and Gateshead Councils’ planned update of the gypsy, traveller or travelling showman study. 5. Presentation slides: Appendix 2b: SHMA Breakfast Briefing for Developers and Registered Providers; 05/07/2017 1. Invitees: Keepmoat Rivergreen Developments Railway Housing Association Esh Property Services Countryside Properties Richmond Fellowship Galliford Try Kier Regeneration Riverside Bellway Mandale Group Thirteen Avant Homes Northumbria University Two Castles Persimmon Homes Newcastle University Tyne Housing Association Banks Group Newcastle College The William Sutton Housing Taylor Wimpey Accent North East Association Ltd NGP Consortium Adler Housing South Tyneside Homes Barratt David Wilson Homes Anchor Trust Your Homes Newcastle Cussins Bernicia Assisi House Hammerson Byker Bridge Byker Community Trust Downing Centre Point Coast and Country Metnor Changing Lives Four Housing Group Adderstone Group Derwentside Homes Habinteg Housing Group Hanro Group Durham Aged Miners Peabody Trust Malhotra Group Four Housing Three Rivers Housing Association Home Group Gary Lewis Derwentside Homes Varsity Halls Gateshead Housing Company St Anthony of Padua Strawsons Property Ltd Guinness Partnership Ltd Methodist Homes Motcomb Estates Ltd Hanover First Port Grantside Developments Ltd Home Group Abbeyfield Yuill Homes Housing & Care 21 McCarthy & Stone Grainger PLC Home Builders Federation Creative Support Morgan Sindall ISOS Haven Muse Developments Jewish Community Council Mental Health Concern Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd Gateshead Gateshead Access Panel Adamson Developments ‘Johnnie’ Johnson Housing Trust Clinical Commissioning Group Robertson Developments Keelman Homes Elders Council WA Fairhurst & Partners Oasis Aquila Quality of Life Partnership Places for People Homes Ltd 2. Attendees: Opinion Research Services, Nigel Moore Gateshead Council, Neil Wilkinson Newcastle City Council, Kath Lawless Gateshead Council, Chris Carr Gateshead Council, Anneliese Hutchinson Newcastle City Council, Kathy Verlander Bellway Homes, Caroline Strugnell Newcastle City Council, Emma Warneford Bernicia, Jeff Boyd Keelman Homes, Amanda Gallagher Clic Land and Planning, Julie Hunter Keepmoat Homes, Claire Slater Cussins, David Brocklehurst Keepmoat Regeneration, Simon Williams Elders Council of Newcastle, Alan Gowers Mears New Homes, Beverley Grey Fairhurst, Miles Walker Miller Homes, Alan Davies Fordinghall Ltd, Bernard Dunner Persimmon Homes, Lee Crawford Galliford Try, Alex Ross Persimmon Homes, Richard Holland Gentoo Homes, Amanda Stephenson Quality of Life Partnership, Barbara Douglas Gentoo Homes, Shaun Cuggy Story Homes, Nick McLellan Gleeson Homes, Emma Carling Taylor Wimpey, Philip James Home Group, Chris Haggon Thirteen Group, Joanne Wakefield Karbon Homes, Michael Farr Tolent Living, Dave Dixon 3. Purpose: Meeting to discuss the emerging Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) survey, and what the purpose of a SHMA is. This sets a joint target for 30,000 homes across the two authorities. The presentation provides stakeholders an update on the findings of the Opinion Research Services study into Objectively Assessed Need. This would allow the Council to review housing and planning polices ahead of the Development and Allocations Plan. Stakeholders were briefed on the findings of the study and given an opportunity to comment on the findings. 4. Minutes and Questions: Q. What evidence is available to support the adoption of a policy requiring new build homes to be constructed to national space standards (NDSS), wheelchair adaptable homes, etc.? What work is being done to estimate the impact on viability of development? The Joint Core Strategy (JCS) has a non-specific requirement to “provide adequate space inside and outside of the home”. MSGP will provide a more specific policy approach to space standards, defining what would be an appropriate level of space standards in new build homes. There was a comment that the evidence base necessary for adopting similar housing standards in the North Tyneside Local Plan was believed to be light by some in the development industry. Q. Newcastle and Gateshead Councils appear to be over delivering in the current housing market – how has this been reconciled with new policy requirements? In addition, what are the Councils doing to promote housing delivery on Council-owned land? There is a need to look at the overall supply of land, not just at Council-owned land or any other individual sites. Local Authorities do not have sufficient resources to substantially expand delivery on Council-owned land without private sector investment. The Plan needs to take account of the market as a whole and take the evidence base as a starting point for policy. Q. Noted concern at a potential higher affordable housing requirement. Is there a reason for the significant change in the affordable housing need, i.e. change in methodology? Nigel Moore (ORS) explained that the SHMA 2017 has a higher rate of new household formation and allows for an increased level of in-migration than in 2013. The intention is to retain the 15% affordable housing provision established in the JCS, however affordable housing is of importance to Members. Q. What is the value of wheelchair adaptable homes? Why is the emerging policy promoting this when wheelchair homes are not as attractive in the market? There was a discussion over the perceived failure of the market to deliver homes suitable for an ageing population. It was suggested that developers could better market their wheelchair homes to the people that need them. The Local Authority is incurring costs for adapting existing housing stock to meet the needs of elderly people. The need for homes suitable for an ageing population may be a more important need than the affordable housing need, however the views of Members should be taken into account. The main issues discussed at the Q&A were the higher affordable housing need, the merits of housing standards including NDSS, wheelchair housing and housing stock suitable for an ageing population. The areas of difference arising appear to be over the impact on viability of introducing housing standard requirements, and how these should be delivered by developers and targeted at the appropriate parts of the market. 5. Presentation slides: Appendix 3: Newcastle City Council Ward Boundary Changes May 2018 .
Recommended publications
  • Housing First Feasibility Study for the Liverpool City Region

    Housing First Feasibility Study for the Liverpool City Region

    Housing First Feasibility Study for the Liverpool City Region Final Report Imogen Blood, Ian Copeman, Mark Goldup, Nicholas Pleace, Joanne Bretherton & Shelly Dulson, Contents Glossary 4 4.9 Mental health 62 Forewords 6 4.10 Access to health and social care 63 Introduction 8 4.11 Peer support 64 4.12 Asset-based community development 65 Chapter 1: The current homelessness system in LCR 12 4.13 Referral routes and assessment 67 1.1 Current homelessness provision 12 4.14 Estimating demand for the Housing First model in the LCR 68 1.2 Demand for homelessness services in LCR 14 4.15 The cost of the proposed Housing First model 68 1.3 Participants’ views on how existing service provision is working 16 4.16 How will the Housing First service link to the wider Housing-Led system? 69 1.4 Barriers within the wider system 17 4.17 Examples of existing LCR resources which Housing First 70 1.5 Strategic challenges, threats and opportunities for LCR in relation to 19 might support people to access homelessness Chapter 5: Financial and Commissioning Implications 72 Chapter 2: Current provision and use of services by people 22 5.1. Housing First: Commissioning approach 72 with complex needs 5.2. Financial Implications: Potential for cashable savings and 78 2.1 Existing services and initiatives focusing on people with complex needs 22 efficiencies from implementing Housing First in LCR 5.3. Housing First Implementation: Potential transitional and phasing 84 2.2 Homelessness service usage by people with complex needs 23 arrangements 2.3 ‘Revolving doors’
  • Zoopla Terms and Conditions

    Zoopla Terms and Conditions

    Zoopla Terms And Conditions Genteel and forty Tadeas never ameliorating whene'er when Miguel abutting his suborner. Self-fulfilling and enjoyable Erhard often double-stopped some glance elementally or dons somberly. African Berke submitted some stand-by after inseverable Er accompanied holus-bolus. Include advertising or solicitor to a few people into reconsidering what is or alan knew alan and try to evaluate the conditions and zoopla terms and Zoopla kicks private landlord listings off internet LandlordZONE. IME Property Joins The Ranks Of Zoopla IME DJK Group Ltd. Member mentor and Conditions Zoopla. Possible and social distancing rules made valuations and viewings impossible. But ensure me forget you a conclusion or your least how I see this situation. Zoopla Limited is an appointed representative of Loans Warehouse Limited which is. Zoopla Terms people Use Zoopla. That this is equity release right to set a and zoopla terms of! Happen Digital Case Studies Helping Zoopla explain its. Zoopla is the UK's most comprehensive property website focused on. Definitions In these construction Terms and Conditions the following definitions shall apply Agent means an estate agent lettings agent and in Scotland. If children wish to fully delete your expand and sensible of its associated information please contact Customer bill You change either email helpzooplacouk or click Submit event request below and displace the contact form only're sorry we see a go. Term investment story including the eventual recovery of lost market. Zoopla london sale Francis Farm. 55000 Offers in region of pump For level by auction Terms and conditions apply In children there got another peg that can jail a managers flat This.
  • Tyne & Wear Archives Service

    Tyne & Wear Archives Service

    Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Archives Collection, Acquisition and Disposal Policy V1.3 Approved by JAMC 22 November 2012 Date for review:1/11/2015 Tyne & Wear Archives Collection, Acquisition and Disposal Policy Background A county archives service for Tyne and Wear was established in 1974 by Tyne and Wear County Council, on the foundation of the collections of the Newcastle Archives Office, whose remit was extended to cover the whole of Tyne and Wear. A branch archive was maintained in North Tyneside until 1988, when the collections there were centralised, and significant archive collections held by libraries and museums in the other Tyne and Wear local authorities have also been transferred to Tyne & Wear Archives over the years. Rationalisation of holdings has also taken place from 1974 with Durham County Record Office and Northumberland Archives, particularly (though not exclusively) in relation to the archives of local authorities and their predecessors. Introduction Tyne & Wear Archives accepts records for continuing preservation in accordance with its Collection, Acquisition and Disposal policy. This policy sets out criteria for selection decisions and also identifies material that falls outside the scope of the collection. For the purposes of this policy, archives are defined as an accumulation of records from an organisation or individual, which are no longer needed to conduct current business and which are selected for preservation because of the evidential and historical information they contain or as evidence of activities. Records are defined as including, but not restricted to, manuscripts, typescripts, maps, plans, drawings, photographs, digital records, sound and moving image recordings, printed works and any other formats that form an archive, or an integral part of an archive, of an organisation or individual.
  • Your Guide to Council Tax

    Your Guide to Council Tax

    Your guide to Council Tax 2021-2022 Important information for people who pay Council Tax. www.newcastle.gov.uk Message from the Leader of the Council This year we have faced uncertainty about the impact of Brexit alongside being plunged into a global pandemic. This, with yet another single year Local Government Finance Settlement, makes planning for the future an even greater challenge than usual. At the start of the Covid crisis, the government promised to do ‘whatever it takes’ to help us. Despite some very welcome one off grants, we were forced to increase expenditure controls during the current financial year, to address the major losses of income and significant additional costs. The impact of Covid will be felt for several years. We are faced with the difficult choice to increase Council Tax by 1.949% and use the 3% adult social care precept increase to help towards the rising cost of caring for older people and our most vulnerable residents. The adult social care precept was introduced by the Government as a way of asking local residents to provide additional funding for social care. So the austerity and cuts of the last decade are clearly far from over. Newcastle has lost £305 million since 2010, £2,270.92 per household. The government have so far refunded less than half of Councils’ £12.6 billion national Covid costs from last year, and have done nothing to fundamentally change the fact that councils all around the country will be forced to make severe cuts in 2021 to balance their books.
  • Friends & Family Care Policy

    Friends & Family Care Policy

    Children, Adults and Families Friends & Family Care Policy August 2015 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 3 2. PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................... 3 3. LEGAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 4 3.1 “Informal Family Care” ..................................................................................... 4 3.2 Private fostering ............................................................................................... 4 3.3 Family, friends and connected foster care ....................................................... 4 3.4 Child Arrangements Orders and Special Guardianship Orders ....................... 5 4. TYPES OF SUPPORT & SERVICES .............................................................. 6 4.1 Family Group Conferences .............................................................................. 6 4.2 Contact ............................................................................................................ 7 5. FINANCIAL SUPPORT .................................................................................... 8 5.1 Section 17 Children Act 1989/ Family Support Payments ............................... 8 5.3 Child Arrangement Order Allowances .............................................................. 9 5.4 Special Guardianship Orders ........................................................................
  • Correct As at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust

    Correct As at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust

    Correct as at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust Charity Allerdale Borough Council Local Government Arch Commercial Enterprise Service provider Association of Police & Crime Commissioners Blue Light Avon & Somerset Constabulary Blue Light Aylesbury Vale District Council Local Government Basildon Borough Council Local Government Bath & North East Somerset Council Local Government Bedford Borough Council Local Government Blackburn with Darwin Council Local Government Blackpool Council Local Government Boston Borough Council Local Government Bristol City Council Local Government Brunel University London University Bury Council Local Government Cambridgeshire County Council Local Government Cardiff County Council Local Government Carmarthenshire County Council Local Government Central Bedfordshire Council Local Government Chapter Homes Housing Association Cheltenham Borough Council Local Government Cherwell District Council & South Northamptonshire Council Local Government Cheshire East Borough Council Local Government Chiltern District Council Local Government City of Lincoln Council Local Government City of London Corporation Local Government City of York Council Local Government Cornwall Council Local Government County Durham Housing Group Housing Association Cranfield University University Cumbria County Council Local Government Darlington Borough Council Local Government Denbighshire County Council Local Government Derbyshire Dales District Council Local Government Doncaster & Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Publication - Duty to Co-Operate Statement

    Core Strategy and Development Plan Publication - Duty to co-operate Statement December 2018 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 2. Strategic Context of the North East ..................................................................................... 5 3. Duty to Cooperate between Seven Local Authorities ........................................................... 11 Status of Local Plan ............................................................................................................. 11 Working together to meet the Duty ...................................................................................... 11 Governance ........................................................................................................................ 12 North of Tyne Devolution ..................................................................................................... 13 Working together going forward ........................................................................................... 13 4. Duty to Cooperate with Each Authority .............................................................................. 15 Sunderland City Council and Gateshead Council ..................................................................... 15 Sunderland and South Tyneside Council ................................................................................ 22 Sunderland City Council and Durham County Council ............................................................
  • Map of Car Parks in the City Centre

    Map of Car Parks in the City Centre

    A6 N 9, A E C 69 LA 6) TOWN MOOR . R R D EM A D O ON R T : \ . ND R To Ashington (A189) OA To Jesmond O D and Gosforth and hotels SM .--· JE ····· """ Royal Jesmond To Ponteland, Jedburgh & Airport Morpeth, Scotland (A1), Hexham (A1, A69) Skateboard Grammar P park School O O A167(M) 8 R R. 05 S K TE T 1 B C 6 E A A L K O L R N R A A A S C R P R N E I University M N H N D O G W N of Newcastle INDSO T B T R E T T TER E O O . upon Tyne R C . N L Medical R D T E D T R A C School R E O C D 1 R B C E 1 A B A D E C D R D . OA FO 2 University R Y 2 Dental Library 24 SAND Hospital Museum of D ON 0) 07 The Hatton GalleryGreat North 16 M -7 13 and Shefton Museum S . 1 B Museum JE os CASTLE LEAZES Royal Victoria (N 31 Infirmary D Antiquities, D A A St. Georges O O R 28 R A 18 I 5 K D R R L University of I A 29 R C O S Northumbria H T W O Northern Stage A at Newcastle A C F R I R Y D V R S Civic D O A S B Centre N N N City G University of BRIDGE A E N Stadium R I Newcastle S University O E K upon Tyne A U Gallery D Q St.
  • City Council Meeting Inquiry of the Co-Ordinating O&S Committee

    City Council Meeting Inquiry of the Co-Ordinating O&S Committee

    City Council Meeting Inquiry of the Co-ordinating O&S Committee 1 Purpose 1.1 One of the recommendations in the Review of Scrutiny, agreed by City Council in March 2018, was that an inquiry into the role and purpose of the full City Council meeting was held. The Co- ordinating agreed to undertake this inquiry at its last meeting and to review the arrangements for City Council meetings. 1.2 A draft terms of reference are appended for the Committee to agree (Appendix 1), which have several lines of enquiry: Understand the statutory requirements and responsibilities of full Council and its role in decision-making in the council; Review Standing Orders to ensure they are fit for purpose; Consider whether the agenda items properly reflect the responsibilities of the council at all levels – from regional to local level; Review the operation of the meetings – the timings, the formalities and use of technology – to ensure it is fit for purpose; Explore the role of Council Business Management Committee (CBM) in supporting Council in non-Executive functions; Explore the role City Council plays in local democracy and public engagement. 1.3 This note sets out some background information and key questions for each area. 2 Previous Reviews of the City Council Process 2.1 The note below includes some findings from previous inquiries and from a recent officer review of the processes associated with the City Council meeting. 2.2 In 2005, the Co-ordinating O&S Committee conducted a review of the Role of Members and the Full Council. The report can be found at: https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/downloads/file/507/role_of_members_at_full_council_scrutiny _report_april_2005pdf .
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne Green Party 2021

    Newcastle Upon Tyne Green Party 2021

    Newcastle upon Tyne Green Party 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 3 Covid-19 ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 HEALTH ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Collaboration ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Social Care ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Public health .............................................................................................................................................. 6 MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING ................................................................................................................ 7 Investing in communities ........................................................................................................................... 7 Regulatory changes prioritising health and wellbeing ................................................................................. 8 Create Healthy Environments ....................................................................................................................
  • Newcastle City Council Duty to Cooperate Statement of Common Ground (Dtcsocg)

    Newcastle City Council Duty to Cooperate Statement of Common Ground (Dtcsocg)

    Newcastle City Council Duty to Cooperate Statement of Common Ground (DtCSoCG) Section Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Legislative and Procedural Requirements of the Duty to Cooperate 3 3 Strategic Context of the North East 6 4 Profile of Newcastle 12 5 Governance Arrangements 18 6 Duty to Cooperate with Newcastle’s Neighbouring Authorities 26 7 Core Strategy Review 32 8 Joint Working Authority Tables 33 Appendices 64 1. Introduction 1.1 This document has been prepared to support the submission of the Development and Allocations Plan (DAP). The DAP will form Part 2 of our statutory Local Plan. It includes non-strategic detailed site allocations and designations together with Development management policies. The Duty to Cooperate Statement of Common Ground (DtCSoCG) demonstrates how the Council has complied and continues to comply with the requirements of the Duty to Cooperate as set out in section 110 of the Localism Act. It sets out the strategic cross-boundary matters relevant to the administrative area of Newcastle City Council and details the engagement that has continued to take place between Newcastle City Council, its neighbouring local authorities, and other relevant public bodies. 1.2 The Duty to Cooperate was introduced through the Localism Act 2011 and is set out in section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. It places a legal duty on local planning authorities and county councils in England, and prescribed public bodies to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis to maximise the effectiveness of local plan and marine plan preparation in the context of strategic cross-boundary matters.
  • Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2019

    Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2019

    Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2019 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Status and Content of this Document ............................................................................................. 2 2 Local Context ................................................................................................................................... 3 3 National Policy ................................................................................................................................ 4 4 Identifying the Housing Requirement - Standard Methodology .................................................... 6 5 Previous Delivery .......................................................................................................................... 10 6 Housing requirement for next five years within County Durham ................................................ 11 7 The supply of Deliverable Sites: Delivering the New Housing Required – Approach to determining the supply of housing ............................................................................................... 12 8 Five Year Supply Calculation ......................................................................................................... 17 9 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 19 10 Monitoring ...............................................................................................................................