DOCSLIB.ORG

Authority Grade Validated Allerdale Borough Council Gold V Bath & NE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Authority Grade Validated Allerdale Borough Council Gold V Bath & NE Authority Grade Validated Allerdale Borough Council Gold V Bath & NE Somerset DC Gold Bedford Bereavement Care Gold Bournemouth Gold Bramcote Bereavement Services Gold Broxbourne Gold Cambridge CC Gold V Cardiff City Council Gold Carlisle Gold V Colchester BC Gold V Conwy CBC Gold Coop Funeral Service Shrewsbury Gold V Cornwall Council Gold Dignity - Rotherham Gold V Doncaster MBC Gold V Durham County Council Gold East Ayrshire Gold V Eastleigh Borough Council Gold Enable LC - LB of Wandsworth Gold V Falkirk Council Gold Fife Gold V Gloucester City Council Gold V Harrogate BC Gold Herefordshire Gold Kent and Sussex Crematorium Gold Kingston Upon Thames Gold V LB of Barking & Dagenham Gold LB of Croydon Gold LB of Ealing Gold LB of Havering Gold LB of Lambeth Gold Manchester City Council Gold Mansfield DC Gold Middlesbrough BC Gold Newcastle City Council Gold Newcastle Under Lyme Gold North Ayrshire Gold North Lanarkshire Gold North Tyneside Gold Nottingham City Council Gold Orbitas, Bereavement Services Ltd Gold Peterborough City Council Gold Reading BC Gold Redditch Borough Council Gold Regional Enterprise (LB Barnet) Gold Royal Borough of Greenwich Gold Rugby Borough Council Gold Salford CC Gold Sandwell Gold South Ayrshire Gold St Albans DC Gold Stafford BC Gold Stoke on Trent City Council Gold Thanet DC Gold Warrington BC Gold V Watford Borough Council Gold Wirral Gold Wolverhampton CC Gold Wyre BC Gold Bradford MDC Silver Caerphilly Silver Cannock Chase Silver Craven District Council Silver Darlington BC Silver Derby Silver V Dunstable Council Silver East Riding of Yorkshire Council Silver Eden District Council Silver Elmbridge BC Silver Hull City Council Silver Id Verde (Northampton) Silver North Northamptonshire Silver LB of Islington Silver LB of Richmond Upon Thames Silver V Leicester City Council Silver Mid Devon DC Silver V North Lincolnshire Silver Oldham Silver Oxford Silver Salisbury City Council Silver V South Lanarkshire Silver South Tyneside Council Silver Southampton City Council Silver St Edmundsbury BC Silver Tameside MBC Silver V Trafford Council Silver V Wavney Norse Ltd Silver Tunbridge Wells Silver Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Silver Worcester Council Silver Amber Valley BC Bronze V Barry Town Council Bronze Belfast City Council Bronze Chesterfield Bronze City of York Council Bronze Eastbourne BC Bronze Erewash BC Bronze Guildford BC Bronze Kirklees MC Bronze Knowsley Borough Council Bronze LB of Newham Bronze LB of Sutton Bronze Leeds CC Bronze V Pembrokeshire County Council Bronze Scottish Borders Council Bronze Sefton MBC Bronze Telford & Wrekin Borough Council Bronze Tendring District Council Bronze Torfaen County Borough Council Bronze Wakefield MBC Bronze Westerleigh - Parndon Wood Bronze Wrexham CBC Bronze Authority Grade Validated Bath & NE Somerset DC Gold Bedford Bereavement Care Gold Bournemouth Gold Bradford MDC Gold Bramcote Bereavement Services Gold Cambridge CC Gold V Cardiff City Council Gold Carlisle Gold V Chesterfield Gold Chilterns Crematorium Joint Committee Gold City of York Council Gold Colchester BC Gold V Conwy CBC Gold Coop Funeral Services Shrewsbury Gold V Co-operative Funeralcare Grenoside Gold Cornwall Council Gold Craven District Council Gold Darlington BC Gold Derby Gold V Dignity - Rotherham Gold V Doncaster MBC Gold V Dorset Council Gold Durham County Council Gold Enable - North East Surrey Gold Falkirk Council Gold Fife Gold V Gloucester City Council Gold V Greater Gwent Cremation Committee Gold Harrogate BC Gold Herefordshire Gold Hull City Council Gold Kent and Sussex Crematorium Gold North Northamptonshire Gold Kingston Upon Thames Gold V Lea Fields Gold LB of Croydon Gold LB of Havering Gold LB of Lambeth Gold Leeds CC Gold V Leicester City Council Gold Manchester City Council Gold Mansfield DC Gold Middlesbrough BC Gold Mortlake JC Gold Nene Valley Gold Newcastle City Council Gold Newcastle Under Lyme Gold North Lincolnshire Gold North Tyneside Gold Nottingham City Council Gold Oldham Gold Orbitas, Bereavement Services Limited Gold Peterborough City Council Gold Reading BC Gold Redditch Borough Council Gold Regional Enterprise (LB Barnet) Gold Royal Borough of Greenwich Gold Rugby Borough Council Gold Salford CC Gold Salisbury City Council Gold V Sandwell Gold South Ayrshire Gold South Lanarkshire Gold South Tyneside Council Gold South West Middlesex Gold Southampton City Council Gold Stafford BC Gold Stoke on Trent City Council Gold Tameside MBC Gold V Thanet DC Gold Trafford Council Gold V Tunbridge Wells Gold Warrington BC Gold V Westerleigh - Parndon Wood Gold Wirral Gold Wolverhampton CC Gold Worcester Council Gold Co-operative Funeralcare (Lichfield) Silver Eastbourne BC Silver Erewash BC Silver Kirklees MC Silver LB of Islington Silver Pembrokeshire County Council Silver Portchester Crematorium JC Silver Sefton MBC Silver Tendring Distrcit Council Silver Wakefield MBC Silver Wrexham CBC Silver Belfast City Council Bronze Guildford BC Bronze Authority Grade Burials Grade Cremations Bath & NE Somerset DC Gold Gold Bedford Bereavement Care Gold Gold Bournemouth Gold Gold Bramcote Bereavement Services Gold Gold Cambridge CC Gold Gold Cardiff City Council Gold Gold Carlisle Gold Gold Colchester BC Gold Gold Conwy CBC Gold Gold Coop Funeral Services Shrewsbury Gold Gold Cornwall Council Gold Gold Dignity - Rotherham Gold Gold Doncaster MBC Gold Gold Durham County Council Gold Gold Enable LC - LB of Wandsworth Gold Gold Falkirk Council Gold Gold Fife Gold Gold Gloucester City Council Gold Gold Harrogate BC Gold Gold Herefordshire Gold Gold Kent and Sussex Crematorium Gold Gold Kingston Upon Thames Gold Gold LB of Croydon Gold Gold LB of Havering Gold Gold LB of Lambeth Gold Gold Manchester City Council Gold Gold Mansfield DC Gold Gold Middlesbrough BC Gold Gold Newcastle City Council Gold Gold Newcastle Under Lyme Gold Gold North Tyneside Gold Gold Nottingham City Council Gold Gold Orbitas, Bereavement Services Limited Gold Gold Peterborough City Council Gold Gold Reading BC Gold Gold Redditch Borough Council Gold Gold Regional Enterprise (LB Barnet) Gold Gold Royal Borough of Greenwich Gold Gold Rugby Borough Council Gold Gold Salford CC Gold Gold Sandwell Gold Gold South Ayrshire Gold Gold Stafford BC Gold Gold Stoke on Trent City Council Gold Gold Thanet DC Gold Gold Warrington BC Gold Gold Wirral Gold Gold Wolverhampton CC Gold Gold Bradford MDC Silver Gold Craven District Council Silver Gold Darlington BC Silver Gold Derby Silver Gold Hull City Council Silver Gold North Northamptonshire Silver Gold Leicester City Council Silver Gold North Lincolnshire Silver Gold Oldham Silver Gold Salisbury City Council Silver Gold South Lanarkshire Silver Gold South Tyneside Council Silver Gold Southampton City Council Silver Gold Tameside MBC Silver Gold Trafford Council Silver Gold Tunbridge Wells Silver Gold Worcester Council Silver Gold Chesterfield Bronze Gold City of York Council Bronze Gold Leeds CC Bronze Gold Westerleigh - Parndon Wood Bronze Gold LB of Islington Silver Silver Eastbourne BC Bronze Silver Erewash BC Bronze Silver Kirklees MC Bronze Silver Pembrokeshire County Council Bronze Silver Sefton MBC Bronze Silver Tendring District Council Bronze Silver Wakefield MBC Bronze Silver Wrexham CBC Bronze Silver Belfast City Council Bronze Bronze Guildford BC Bronze Bronze Original Scores Bronze Silver Gold Cremation 344 and below 345 to 389 390 and above Burial 491 and below 492 to 534 535 and above New Scores Cremation <= 354 355-399 400 => Burial <= 530 531-569 570 =>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Equality and Health Inequalities Pack: NHS Trafford
    Equality and Health Inequalities Pack NHS Trafford CCG December 2018 Email for enquiries: [email protected] OFFICIAL Gateway ref: 08541 v 13:09:20 v 13:09:20 Acknowledgements We wouldjjjjjlike to thank Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) for their help developing and testing these packs. In particular we would like to thank: Newham, Bromley, Somerset and Dorset for reviewing and discussing various versions of their packs with us. We would like to thank Professors Chris Bentley (Health Inequalities National Support Team Associate) and Richard Cookson of York University for their regular inputs during the development of these packs. In particular we would like to thank them for their time reviewing successive iterations, engaging with CCGs and making suggestions for both developing the analyses and for making them more accessible to CCGs. We would like to thank Public Health England (PHE) and Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) analysts for discussing a sample pack and for making suggestions for improving the analyses within it. We would like to thank the many colleagues across NHS England for their help developing these packs, including the Equalities and Health Inequalities Unit, NHS England analysts, directors across business priorities and National Clinical Directors. NHS Trafford CCG NHS RightCare 2 Contents • Foreword 4 • Executive Statistical Summary 5-6 • Executive Summary - Case Studies and Resources 7 • Your Equality and Health Inequalities Pack 8 • The National Big Picture 9 • Why Should Addressing Health Inequalities
    [Show full text]
  • Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1)
    Allerdale Borough Council Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Strategic and Development Management Policies July 2014 www.allerdale.gov.uk/localplan Foreword To meet the needs of Allerdale’s communities we need a plan that provides for new jobs to diversify and grow our economy and new homes for our existing and future population whilst balancing the need to protect the natural and built environment. This document, which covers the area outside the National Park, forms the first part of the Allerdale Local Plan and contains the Core Strategy and Development Management policies. It sets a clear vision, for the next 15 years, for how new development can address the challenges we face. The Core Strategy will guide other documents in the Allerdale Local Plan, in particular the site allocations which will form the second part of the plan. This document is the culmination of a great deal of public consultation over recent years, and extensive evidence gathering by the Council. The policies in the Plan will shape Allerdale in the future, helping to deliver sustainable economic development, jobs and much needed affordable housing for our communities. Councillor Mark Fryer Economic Growth Portfolio holder Contents What is the Allerdale Local Plan? ......................................................................... 1 What else is it delivering? ..................................................................................... 6 Spatial Portrait .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Property Newsletter
    Property Newsletter Properties available for bidding 22/09/21 to 27/09/21 Property Reference: 4251 Property Reference: 42510 Property Reference: 42511 Landlord: Sandwell MBC Landlord: Sandwell MBC Landlord: Sandwell MBC Type: 2 Bed Ground Floor Flat High Rise Type: 1 Bed Bungalow Semi Detached Type: 1 Bed Ground Floor Flat Low Rise Address: Aldridge Road Oldbury Address: Conway Avenue Millfields West Address: Crown Walk Tipton West Midlands Bromwich Rent: £79.78 Rent: £70.52 Rent: £84.01 EPC Asset Rating - Band Awaiting EPC EPC Asset Rating - Band C EPC Asset Rating - Band Awaiting EPC Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Minimum Age: 40+ Minimum Age: 40+ Minimum Age: 55+ Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Description: B68 0HB. LAWRENCE COURT. Description: DY4 7SY. CROWN WALK. Located Located in the Brandhall area of Oldbury. No Child Description: B71 2PB. Located in the Millfields in the Burnt Tree area of Tipton. PROPERTY HAS Block.All Occupants must be aged 40+ No Dogs area of West Bromwich. Property has a Wet A LEVEL ACCESS SHOWER. Applicants must Allowed. Property has Step up Shower. Room. 2x steps to front door and a 6 inch step to have a recognised need for the adaptations in the rear. Preference will be given to applicants who property.MAY BECOME AVAILABLE.All have a recognised meduical need or priority for GF occupants must be aged 40+ accommodation. Property Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Land Review Screening South Tyneside Local Plan
    South Tyneside Local Plan Habitat Regulation Assessment: Strategic Land Review Screening South Tyneside Local Plan Jul 2017 [Blank Page – inside front cover] Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. What is a Habitat Regulation Assessment (HRA)? 2 3. HRA Methodology Overview 5 4. Stage One – South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Introduction 7 5. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Identification of and Information Gathering for European 9 Sites 6. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Identification of Impact Pathways 15 7. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Analysis of SLR Options 21 8. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Analysis of Evidence Base 24 9. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Screening of SLR Sites 41 Page Appendices: A. Durham Coast SAC Citation, Conservation Objectives and Natura 2000 Single Data Form 20 B. Northumbria Coast SPA Citation, Conservation Objectives and Natura 2000 Single Data Form 24 C. APIS Data – Air pollution vulnerabilities: Durham Coast SAC and Northumbria Coast SPA 28 D. Other Plans and Projects – In combination assessment 31 E. Annex E -Survey Site Assessments – Visitor and Non-breeding Bird Survey Summaries 62 F. Preliminary Screening for Likely Significant Effects of the SLR (either alone or in-combination) – Site by Site 72 Analysis 1. Introduction 1.1 It is a requirement of Habitat Regulations that Local Plans are subject to a Habitat Regulations Assessment Local Plan -indicative structure and summary timetable: (HRA). The purpose of a HRA is to assess the potential impacts of a plan against the conservation objectives of South Tyneside Local Plan development plan European sites - Special Protection Areas (SPA), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Ramsar Sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Add Presentation Title Here
    EDRM - Why BBW Choose OpenText A solution and Partner to deliver benefits • EDRMs to meet our needs for the whole organisation and beyond – For BBW – For NTC across all retained services – Joining up processes with mutli-agency collaboration • A partner with proven expertise and Local Government reference ability – BBW have OpenText tools (training communications etc) already developed with other Councils that can accelerate implementation (and hence benefits) • A partner rated highly by independent analysts – Gartner, Forrester and others • A partner who the BBW team have used before BBW are confident that OpenText will help achieve benefits in our services and support similar levels of savings for NTC. It will also support multi agency collaboration as a potential income stream to NTC % of the 90 Fortune 500 Companies are leveraging Enterprise Information Management (EIM) from OpenText to turn vision into reality $1 20 Billion years Global of Innovation Revenue $1 5000 # EIM Billion R&D Investment # of Employees 50k 141 60 Countries Offices around the world # of Customers # Supported Customers (by Industry) Food & Beverage Financial Services Oil & Gas Pharmaceuticals Transportation Government Media Legal Manufacturing Examples of Local Government Customers London Borough of Ealing Stockport Metropolitan BC Mid Sussex District Council London Borough of Haringey Buckinghamshire County Council Cambridge City Council London Borough of Hounslow Central Bedfordshire East Hertfordshire District Council London Borough of Merton Cornwall County
    [Show full text]
  • IMPROVING ADULT REHABILITATION SERVICES in ENGLAND Sharing Best Practice in Acute and Community Care
    NHS Improving Quality IMPROVING ADULT REHABILITATION SERVICES IN ENGLAND Sharing best practice in acute and community care Contents 3 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Background 6 Common elements and top tips 7 Case studies 12 DEVELOPING A REHABILITATION STRATEGY 1: North of England Commissioning Support Unit - Developing a rehabilitation 12 strategy for South of Tyne and Wear to drive improvement 2: South West Commissioning Support Unit - An integrated rehabilitation 14 strategy for Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire INTEGRATED SERVICES 3: Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust and Royal Borough of Greenwich Adult 16 Community Services - Rapid response service providing rehabilitation to older people 4: Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust - Developing a single 18 integrated community rehabilitation service – the ‘ICARES’ Service 5: The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust - Development of an integrated 20 community rehabilitation service 6: South Cheshire Clinical Commissioning Group - Commissioner led redesign of 22 extended rehabilitation service SPECIALIST MODELS 7: South East London Regional Amputee Service and Guy’s and St Thomas’ 24 NHS Foundation Trust - Integrated amputee rehabilitation service 8: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust - Pulmonary rehabilitation support for 26 elective lung surgery 9: Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust and Trafford Community Rehabilitation 28 Services - Developing standardised rehabilitation guidelines to reduce local variation 10: Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Partnership NHS Trust - ‘Adult
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing First Feasibility Study for the Liverpool City Region
    Housing First Feasibility Study for the Liverpool City Region Final Report Imogen Blood, Ian Copeman, Mark Goldup, Nicholas Pleace, Joanne Bretherton & Shelly Dulson, Contents Glossary 4 4.9 Mental health 62 Forewords 6 4.10 Access to health and social care 63 Introduction 8 4.11 Peer support 64 4.12 Asset-based community development 65 Chapter 1: The current homelessness system in LCR 12 4.13 Referral routes and assessment 67 1.1 Current homelessness provision 12 4.14 Estimating demand for the Housing First model in the LCR 68 1.2 Demand for homelessness services in LCR 14 4.15 The cost of the proposed Housing First model 68 1.3 Participants’ views on how existing service provision is working 16 4.16 How will the Housing First service link to the wider Housing-Led system? 69 1.4 Barriers within the wider system 17 4.17 Examples of existing LCR resources which Housing First 70 1.5 Strategic challenges, threats and opportunities for LCR in relation to 19 might support people to access homelessness Chapter 5: Financial and Commissioning Implications 72 Chapter 2: Current provision and use of services by people 22 5.1. Housing First: Commissioning approach 72 with complex needs 5.2. Financial Implications: Potential for cashable savings and 78 2.1 Existing services and initiatives focusing on people with complex needs 22 efficiencies from implementing Housing First in LCR 5.3. Housing First Implementation: Potential transitional and phasing 84 2.2 Homelessness service usage by people with complex needs 23 arrangements 2.3 ‘Revolving doors’
    [Show full text]
  • 191010-2019-Annual-Report-Final
    Chairman's Statement 2018-2019 The difficult trading conditions continued during the year and the effect of losing the South Tyneside contract is plain to see in the audited accounts. Fortunately, NECA was aware that this situation could develop so was able to successfully manage the resulting reduction in income, therefore to return a small surplus is a very satisfactory result. The withdrawal of support by South Tyneside Council meant Ambassador House could not continue nor the blue light café on Beach Road. Fortunately NECA was able to reach an agreement with Karbon Homes to transfer the lease of Ambassador House to The Key Project at no cost to the Charity. I’d like to thank Karbon Homes for their valued assistance in facilitating this arrangement. On a positive note NECA was delighted to be chosen to run the pilot scheme for Hungry Britain. This involved the NECA Community Garden providing lunch and activities for children in South Tyneside during the school holidays. The pilot scheme was extremely successful and the event was rolled-out across other areas of the country. Thank you to South Shields MP, Emma Lowell-Buck for her involvement and valued assistance with this project. The NECA Community Garden was also extremely proud to be invited to take part in the Queens Commonwealth Canopy project. This involved planting trees to commemorate Her Majesty The Queen’s 65 years on the throne. Two saplings were planted in the garden by the Lord Lieutenant of Tyne & Wear, Mrs. Susan Winfield ably assisted by local schoolchildren. The success of those two events has encouraged the Trustees to widen the organisation’s remit so that it can offer services to the wider community and not just to those affected by drug and alcohol misuse, and gambling.
    [Show full text]
  • DUTY to REFER North-East Housing Referral Form (S213b)
    DUTY TO REFER North-East Housing Referral Form (s213b) Please use this referral for any service users that may be homeless or threatened with homelessness within 56 days. If the referral is urgent, and/or the service user has no accommodation tonight, you may wish to make contact by telephone to the relevant authority. Referrer Details Name of person completing form Public Body (name of organisation) Section/department and location/base of referrer Referrer Telephone Referrer E-mail Service User Details Name D.O.B (dd/mm/yyyy) NI Number Current Address Tenancy Type Contact Telephone Contact Email Other person to call Other contact details Household Type (please tick ONE) Single (no children) Couple (no children) Single & Pregnant Couple & Pregnant Single Parent Couple with dependent children Single Parent with non-dependent children Couple with non-dependent children Reason for Homelessness/Threat of Homelessness (please tick no more than TWO) Domestic Abuse Left Institution End of Private Tenancy (AST) Non-racially motivated violence/harassment End of Private Tenancy (non-AST) Mortgage repossession End of Social Rented Tenancy Property disrepair Eviction from supported accommodation Racially motivated violence/harassment Family no longer willing to accommodate Relationship breakdown (non-violent) Fire, Flood, Emergency Required to leave by the Home Office Friends no longer willing to accommodate Other Left HM Forces Support Needs (please tick all that apply) Young person aged 16-17 Young person aged 18-25 Young parent Care leaver aged
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Credit National Expansion
    Universal Credit national expansion – Tranches One and Two Following the successful roll out of Universal Credit in the north-west of England, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) can provide details of the first and second tranches of national expansion to local authorities and jobcentre areas. Universal Credit will roll out to new claims from single people, who would otherwise have been eligible for Jobseeker’s Allowance, including those with existing Housing Benefit and Working Tax Credit claims. The list below confirms the go live dates for Tranches One and Two which will begin to deliver Universal Credit between February and July 2015. The Commencement Order for Tranches One and Two of national expansion, which confirmed the areas that will be going live, can be accessed here: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/101/pdfs/uksi_20150101_en.pdf And the list of postcodes that will be going live can be accessed here – https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/402501/ universal-credit-index-of-relevant-districts.pdf This list is in alphabetical order by local authority. Tranche One: February 2015 – April 2015 Local authority Jobcentre area Go live date Ashford Borough Council Ashford JCP 13 April 2015 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Barnsley JCP 2 March 2015 Goldthorpe JCP Wombwell JCP Basildon Council Basildon JCP 16 March 2015 Bassetlaw District Council Retford JCP 23 February 2015 Worksop JCP Bedford Borough Council Bedford JCP 2 March 2015 Birmingham City Council Broad Street JCP 13 April
    [Show full text]