DOCSLIB.ORG

BMF-Ghettoliste Positivbearbeitung

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BMF-Ghettoliste Positivbearbeitung BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Abaújszántó [Hun] Ungarn, Operationszone 16. April 1944 15. Juni 1944 (Szántó) I (Gebiet Abaúj) Reichskommissariat Abol’tsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], Generalbezirk 14. August 1941 Oboltzi [Yid], Obolce Weißruthenien, heute [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, Operationszone Nagyabony, 28. April 1944 27. Juni 1944 IV Szolnokabony) Alba Iulia Rumänien 01.07.1941 23.08.1944 Ungarn (Pest-Pilis-Solt- Alberti Kiskun County) 01.05.1944 Ende Juni 1944 Operationszone VI Aleksandriya [Rus] Reichskommissariat (Aleksandria [Pol, Ukraine (1941-1944), Yid], Oleksandriia heute: Ukraine, Gebiet 1. September 1941 23. September 1943 [Ukr], Aleksandriia, Riwne; früher: Polen, Aleksandrija, Gebiet Wolyn Aleksandrya) Aleksandrów Lódzki [Pol] (Aleksander Reichsgau Wartheland [Yid], Aleskandrów, (1939-1945); heute: 27.12.1939 Aleksandrova, Polen, Gebiet Lódzkie Aleksandor) Alytus [Lith] (Olita [Pol, Rus], Alita [Yid], Litauen Ende Juli 1941 09.09.1941 Al īta [Latv], Alytaus, Alitus, Alyta) Ambarowo, Ambrose, Transnistrien, Bezirk Kornejewo-Dalni 30.08.1941 18.03.1944 Odessa (Rus), Lichtenfeld, Amsterdam (Judenviertel I, II und Niederlande 15. September 1941 September 1943 III) BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Amsterdam- Niederlande 01.04.1942 30.09.1943 Asterdorp Anan'yiv, Anan'yer, Ukraine, Odessaer Ende August 1941 Ende März 1944 Anan'yev, Anan'yer Oblast Transnistrien, Bezirk Androtefca Oceacov, Rajon 01.08.1942 18.03.1944 (Avdotefca) Varvarovca Andrychów [Pol] (Yandrichov [Yid], Preußen (Provinz Andrichau [Ger], Oberschlesien); heute 01.09.1941 12.11.1943 Andrichov, Polen, Gebiet Andrikhov, Małopolskie Yendrikhov) Annopol [Pol] (Anapol [Yid], Generalgouvernement, Annopol (Lublin), Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.06.1942 01.10.1942 Annopol-Rachów, 1944); heute: Polen Rachów-Annopol) Antonowka, (Antonovka [Rus, Ukraine, Gebiet Rowno, Yid], Antonówka 1. September 1941 31. Oktober 1942 Rayon Kostopol' [Pol], Antonivka [Ukr], Antonuvka) Reichskommissariat Antonyny (Antoniny Ukraine (1941-1944), 05.09.1941 Jul 42 [Rus], Antonin [Yid]) heute Gebiet Kamjanez- Podilskyj Antopol [Rus, Pol] 1941 bis 1945: (Antapoli [Yid], Reichskommissariat Antopal [Bel], Ukraine; heute: Belarus, Frühling 1942 November 1942 Antepolye, Antipolye, Kreis Drogotschin, Antopole) Gebiet Brest Artemivs'k [Ukr] (Artëmovsk [Rus, since 1924], Bakhmut Reichskommissariat [Rus, before 1924], Ukraine (1941-1944), 1. Novmeber 1941 15. Februar 1942 Bachmut [Yid, Pol], heute: Ukraine, Gebiet Artemowsk, Stalino (Donets'k) Artemovsk, Artiomovsk) Asipovichy [Bel] (Osipovichi [Rus, Reichskommissariat Yid], Osipowicze Ostland (1941-1944), [Pol], Ossipowitschi Generalbezirk 2. August 1941 Mai 1942 [Ger], Asipovi čy, Weißruthenien; heute: Ospipovichi, Belarus, Gebiet Mogilev Sipovichi) BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Augustów [Pol] (Ogustove [Yid], Avgustov [Rus], Augustavas [Lith], Preußen (Provinz Augustuva [Latv], Ostpreußen); heute: 01.08.1942 10.11.1942 Agustov, Augustov, Polen, Gebiet Bialystok Oygstova, Yagestov, Yagistov, Yagustova, Augusthal) Bacau, Bac ău Rumänien 01.07.1941 23.08.1944 Ba čka Topola [Serb] Ungarn, Operationszone (Backa Topola, IV; heute: Serbien; 28. April 1944 26. Juni 1944 Topolya [Hun], zwischen WW: Topolo) Jugoslawien Ba čko Petrovo Selo [Serb] (Backo Petrovo Selo, Petrovoszello [Hun], Ungarn, Operationszone Péterréve [Hun], IV; heute: Serbien; 28. April 1944 Mai 1944 Batschko Petrovo zwischen WW: Selo [Ger], Jugoslawien Bácspetrovoszello, Boacko Petrovo Selo) Bácsalmás [Hun] (Almás, Bácsahná, Ungarn, Operationszone Aljmaš [Croa], Aljmaš 28. April 1944 28. Juni 1944 IV [Serb], Almasch [Ger]) Ungarn, Operationszone Bagolyuk, Bagolyuki 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 IV Baia Mare [Rom] Baia Mare [Rom] (Nagybána [Hung], (Nagybána [Hung], Frauenbach [Ger], Frauenbach [Ger], Anfang Mai 1944 07.06.1944 Baja Mare, Baia- Baja Mare, Baia-Mare, Mare, Nagybanya) Nagybanya) Baja [Hun, Serb] Ungarn, Operationszone (Frankenstadt [Ger], 16.04.1944 Ende Juni 1944 IV (Gebiet Bács-Bodrog) Francovilla [Lat]) Balaklava [Rus, Ukr], (Balıqlava [Tatar], Ukraine, Sewastopol', 1. September 1941 31. Oktober 1942 Balıklava [Turk], Crimea Balaklawa) Balaniwka Ukraine, Gebiet Vinnitsa (Balanowka, Ende August 1941 Ende März 1944 (Transnistrien) Balanovka) BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Balassagyarmat [Hun] (Balážske Ďarmoty [Slov], Balašské Ďarmoty Ungarn, Operationszone 24. April 1944 12. Juni 1944 [Cz], Jahrmarkt [Ger], III Yarmit [Yid], Dzhormet, D ěrmet, Balassa-Gyarmat) Ukraine, Gebiet Balky (Balki) Ende August 1941 Ende März 1944 Winnyzja; Transnistrien Ungarn, Operationszone Balmazújváros [Hun] 28. April 1944 28. Juni 1944 IV Balsoia-Caranica Transnistrien, Bezirk (Balsoi Caranica, Oceacov, Rajon 01.08.1943 18.03.1944 Balsaia-Caranica, Varvarovca Balschaja Karanika) Balta (Balte [Yid], Ukraine, Gebiet Ende August 1941 Ende März 1944 Bałta [Pol]) Odessa; Transnistrien Bandisovca Transnistrien 30.08.1941 18.03.1944 Ukraine, Gebiet Bar [Rus, Ukr, Yid] Juli 1941 Ende März 1944 Winnyzja; Transnistrien Baranovka [Rus, Yid] (Baranivka [Ukr], Ukraine, Gebiet Zhitomir 10. Juli 1941 31. Oktober 1943 Baranówka [Pol], Baronovka) Baranów Sandomierski [Pol] Generalgouvernement, (Baranów, Baranov Distrikt Krakau (1939- 03.06.1942 30.07.1942 [Yid], Barniv, 1944) Bornov) Baranow, (Baranów [Pol], Baranov [Yid], Generalgouvernement, Baranuv [Rus], Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 08.05.1942 Baranów nad 1944) Wieprzem) BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Baranowitschi (Baranavichy [Bel], Baranovichi [Rus], Baranowicze [Pol], Baranovich [Yid], 1941 bis 1944/1945: Baranawitschy [Ger], Reichskommissariat September/ Baranovi čiai [Lith], Ostland Dezember 1941 November 1943 Baranovitch, (Weißruthenien); heute: Baranovitsh, Belarus, Gebiet Brest Baranovits, Baranovitsh, Baranoviche, Baranavi čy) Barcs [Hun], (Dravaszentes,Somo gytarnoca,Somogytar Ungarn, Operationszone 26.April 1944 Juni 1944 nóca,Somogy V (Gebiet Somogy) Tarnocza,Drávaszent es) Baremel' [Ukr] (Boremel [Pol], Boromel [Yid], Boreml, Boremla, Polen, Gebiet Volyn; Sommer 1942 8. Oktober 1942 Beremelia, heute: Ukraine Mochalivka, Michałówka, Michailowka) Barlad, B ȃrlad Rumänien 01.07.1941 23.08.1944 Barysaw [Bel] (Borisov [Rus, Yid], Borysów [Pol], Reichskommissariat Baryssau [Ger], Ostland, Generalbezirk 2. August 1941 November 1943 Borisovas [Lith], Weißruthenien; heute Borissow, Barysa ŭ) Belarus, Gebiet Minsk (Krasnoarmejskaja und Slobodka) Batakiai [Lith], (Batok [Yid], Botoki [Rus, Pol], Botocken Reichskommissariat [Ger], Batakyay, Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 Sep 41 Batakiaj, Bataki ų, Generalbezirk Litauen Botoka, Botak, Botik, Batuk) Generalgouvernement, Batorz Distrikt Lublin (1939- 1.Januar 1940 2. Oktober 1942 1944); heute Polen Batsevichi Weißrussland 01.09.1941 31.12.1941 Battonya (Romanian: Ungarn, Operationszone Batania, Serbian: 28. April 1944 26. Juni 1944 IV Batanja) BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Beclean [Rom] Ungarn, Operationszone (Bethlen [Hun], 20. April 1944 5.Mai 1944 II Betlen, Bethlensdorf) Będków [Pol] Generalgouvernement, (Bendkov [Yid], Distrikt Radom (1939- 01.04.1942 01.09.1942 Bendkuv [Rus]) 1945) Będzin [Pol] (Bendin Preußen (Provinz [Yid], Bendsburg Oberschlesien) (1939- 01.01.1941 02.08.1943 [Ger, 1939-45], 1945) Bendzin [Ger, Rus]) Békés [Hun] (Békéš Ungarn, Operationszone [Slov], Bichi ş [Rom], 21. Mai 1944 26. Juni 1944 V (Gebiet Bekes) Bekes) Békéscsaba [Hun] (Békešská Čaba Ungarn, Operationszone [Slov], Bichi şciaba 21. Mai 1944 26. Juni 1944 V [Rom], Nagymajor, Mez őmegyer, Gerla) Ungarn, Operationszone Bekesmegyer 1. März 1944 30. Juni 1944 IV Bełchatów [Pol] Reichsgau Wartheland (Belchatov [Yid], (1939-1945); heute: 01.03.1941 01.08.1942 Belkhatuv [Rus], Polen, Gebiet Lódzkie Belkhatov) Ungarn, Operationszone Beled [Hun] 21. Mai 1944 5. Juli 1944 V BMF-Ghettoliste in Überarbeitung Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Belilovka [Rus] Ukraine, Gebiet Shitomir 06. September 1941 Frühjahr 1942 (Bilylivka, Byelilovka) Bels [Ger], (Belz Generalgouvernement, [Rus, Ukr, Yid], Bełz Distrikt Galizien (1941- 06.09.1941 Sep 42 [Pol], Bełsk, Beltz, 1944) Belzec, Beltsy) Beł żec [Pol], Generalgouvernement, (Belzhetz [Yid], Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 Mai 42 Belzhets, Belzec) 1944) Beł życe [Pol] (Belzhitza [Yid], Generalgouvernement, Belzhytze [Rus], Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.06.1940 01.05.1943 Belzhitse, Belzhyce, 1944) Belzhits) Bendery [Rus], (Bender [Yid, Ger], Tighina [Rom], Transnistrien 11.11.1941 Mrz 44 Benderî, Tehinia, Tigina, Tiginia) Berbesti (Berbe şti [Rom], Bárdfalva Rumänien, früher: 16. April 1944 Mai 1944 [Hun], Berbesht Ungarn [Yid], Bárdfalu) Berdychiv [Ukr], Berdichev [Rus] (Barditchev [Yid], Berdyczów [Pol], Berdicev [Rom], Ukraine, Gebiet 22. August 1941 Sommer 1943 Berditchev, Shytomyr Berditchov, Berditschew, Berdytschiw, Berdyciv) Berehovo (Berehove [Ukr], Beregszász [Hun], Beregovo Transkarpatien (am [Rus], Berehowo 19.03.1944 als Teil Apr 44 Mai 44 [Pol], Beregsaz [Yid], Ungarns von deutschen Bergsaß [Ger], Truppen besetzt) Sachsisch-Bereg, Berekhovo) Berestechko [Rus, Reichskommissariat Ukr] (Beresteczko Ukraine (1941-1944), [Pol], Berestetchka 1. Oktober 1941 9. September 1942 heute Gebiet Wolyn; [Yid], Brestitski, früher Polen Berestetschko) Transnistrien, Bezirk Beretchi (Bereschi, Golta, Rajon Crivoi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalsozialistische Schulverwaltung in Hamburg. Vier Führungspersonen
    H H H F HF Hamburger Historische Forschungen | Band 1 Hamburger Historische Forschungen | Band 12 Uwe Schmidt Nationalsozialistische Schul- verwaltung in Hamburg Nach dem Machtwechsel in Hamburg Neben Karl Witt waren dies die Prote- wurde am 8. März 1933 die Schulver- gés des Gauleiters und Reichsstatthal- Vier Führungspersonen waltung dem Deutschnationalen und ters Karl Kaufmann Wilhelm Schulz, späteren Nationalsozialisten Karl Witt Albert Henze und Ernst Schrewe. Ihre unterstellt. Umgestellt auf das natio- Nähe zum Machtzentrum um Kauf- nalsozialistische Führungsprinzip wur- mann führte zu sehr unterschiedlichen de sie in zunehmendem Maße für die formalen wie informellen Verankerun- Durchsetzung nationalsozialistischer gen in den Mechanismen des poly- Erziehungsvorstellungen instrumen- kratischen nationalsozialistischen talisiert. Diese wurden vor allem über Systems. Der politische Druck, der von die Personen durchgesetzt, welche die der Spitze der Schulverwaltung auf die Behörde leiteten oder aber durch in- Schulen ausgeübt wurde, verstärkte formell ausgeübte Macht dominierten. sich seit Kriegsbeginn und erreichte sei- Verdeutlicht wird daher die Position nen Höhepunkt in der Machtfülle und der vier schulbezogenen Funktionsträ- rücksichtslosen Machtausübung des ger im Macht- und Herrschaftssystem nationalsozialistischen Senatsdirektors des Hamburger Nationalsozialismus. und Gauschulungsleiters Albert Henze. Nationalsozialistische Schulverwaltung in Hamburg ISBN 978-3-937816-49-4 ISSN 1865-3294 2 Hamburg University Press Nationalsozialistische
    [Show full text]
  • Arani, Miriam Y. "Photojournalism As a Means of Deception in Nazi-Occupied Poland, 1939– 45." Visual Histories of Occupation: a Transcultural Dialogue
    Arani, Miriam Y. "Photojournalism as a means of deception in Nazi-occupied Poland, 1939– 45." Visual Histories of Occupation: A Transcultural Dialogue. Ed. Jeremy E. Taylor. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 159–182. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 23 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350167513.ch-007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 23 September 2021, 13:56 UTC. Copyright © Jeremy E. Taylor 2021. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 7 Photojournalism as a means of deception in Nazi-occupied Poland, 1939–45 Miriam Y. Arani Introduction Outside Europe, the conflicting memories of Germans, Poles and Jews are hard to understand. They are informed by conflicts before and during the Second World War. In particular, the impact of Nazism in occupied Poland (1939–45) – including the Holocaust – is difficult to understand without considering the deceitful propaganda of Nazism that affected visual culture in a subliminal but crucial way. The aim of this chapter is to understand photographs of the Nazi occupation of Poland as visual artefacts with distinct meanings for their contemporaries in the framework of a specific historical and cultural context. I will discuss how Nazi propaganda deliberately exploited the faith in still photography as a neutral depiction of reality, and the extent of that deceit through photojournalism by the Nazi occupiers of Poland. In addition, I will outline methods through which to evaluate the reliability of photographic sources. For the purposes of reliability and validity, I use a large, randomized sample with all kinds of photographs from archives, libraries and museums in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles Under German Occupation the Situation and Attitudes of Poles During the German Occupation
    Truth About Camps | W imię prawdy historycznej (en) https://en.truthaboutcamps.eu/thn/poles-under-german-occu/15596,Poles-under-German-Occupation.html 2021-09-25, 22:48 Poles under German Occupation The Situation and Attitudes of Poles during the German Occupation The Polish population found itself in a very difficult situation during the very first days of the war, both in the territories incorporated into the Third Reich and in The General Government. The policy of the German occupier was primarily aimed at the liquidation of the Polish intellectual elite and leadership, and at the subsequent enslavement, maximal exploitation, and Germanization of Polish society. Terror was conducted on a mass and general scale. Executions, resettlements, arrests, deportations to camps, and street round-ups were a constant element of the everyday life of Poles during the war. Initially the policy of the German occupier was primarily aimed at the liquidation of the Polish intellectual elite and leadership, and at the subsequent enslavement, maximal exploitation, and Germanization of Polish society. Terror was conducted on a mass and general scale. Food rationing was imposed in cities and towns, with food coupons covering about one-third of a person’s daily needs. Levies — obligatory, regular deliveries of selected produce — were introduced in the countryside. Farmers who failed to deliver their levy were subject to severe repressions, including the death penalty. Devaluation and difficulty with finding employment were the reason for most Poles’ poverty and for the everyday problems in obtaining basic products. The occupier also limited access to healthcare. The birthrate fell dramatically while the incidence of infectious diseases increased significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • General Conclusions and Basic Tendencies 1. System of Human Rights Violations
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND BASIC TENDENCIES 1. SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS The year 2003 was marked by deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus. While the general human rights situation in the country did not improve, in its certain spheres it significantly changed for the worse. Disrespect for and regular violations of the basic constitutional civic rights became an unavoidable and permanent factor of the Belarusian reality. In 2003 the Belarusian authorities did not even hide their intention to maximally limit the freedom of speech, freedom of association, religious freedom, and human rights in general. These intentions of the ruling regime were declared publicly. It was a conscious and open choice of the state bodies constituting one of the strategic elements of their policy. This political process became most visible in formation and forced intrusion of state ideology upon the citizens. Even leaving aside the question of the ideology contents, the very existence of an ideology, compulsory for all citizens of the country, imposed through propaganda media and educational establishments, and fraught with punitive sanctions for any deviation from it, is a phenomenon, incompatible with the fundamental human right to have a personal opinion. Thus, the state policy of the ruling government aims to create ideological grounds for consistent undermining of civic freedoms in Belarus. The new ideology is introduced despite the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus which puts a direct ban on that.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Reichsgau Wartheland in Den Jahren 1939–1945
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS WRATISLAVIENSIS No 3840 Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 40, nr 2 Wrocław 2018 DOI: 10.19195/2300-7249.40.2.4 WOJCIECH WICHERT Oddziałowe Biuro Badań Historycznych IPN w Szczecinie ORCiD: 0000-0003-1335-592X „Exerzierplatz des Nationalsozialismus“ — der Reichsgau Wartheland in den Jahren 1939–1945 Kein anderes Land befand sich so lange unter der Besatzung des Dritten Reiches wie Polen. Polen war das erste Opfer der deutschen Aggression und hat als erstes Land unter großen Opfern zuerst bewaffneten Widerstand geleistet und später in den Jahren 1939–1945 beispiellose Personen-, Kultur- und Materialver- luste erlitten. Der deutsche Überfall auf Polen im September 1939, die Einstel- lung und die Verbrechen gegenüber Polen waren eine Form von Ausführung des antislawischen Rassismus. Die neueren Forschungen, insbesondere die, die seit den neunziger Jahren geführt wurden, offenbaren die tatsächliche Größe der ver- brecherischen Politik gegenüber den slawischen Völkern. Sie zeigen, wie sich der deutsche Nationalismus zum Rassismus entwickelt hat, das Ziel verfolgend die slawische Bevölkerung durch die nationalsozialistische Germanisierungspolitik aus ihrer Heimat zu vertreiben und sie durch die „höhere arische Rasse“ zu be- siedeln1. Diese Maßnahmen der Besatzung wurden in den schon vor dem Krieg ausgearbeiteten Generalplan Ost aufgenommen, in ein großangelegtes Kolonisie- rungs- und Germanisierungsprojekt der Gebiete in Ostmitteleuropa und in Ost- europa, das mit der Aussiedlung beziehungsweise mit der Eliminierung der hier niedergelassenen slawischen Bevölkerung verbunden war2. Vor allem aus dieser 1 A. Wolff-Powęska, Pamięć, brzemię i uwolnienie. Niemcy wobec nazistowskiej przeszłości (1945–2010) [Erinnerung — Last und Befreiung. Die Deutschen gegenüber die nationalsozialisti- schen Vergangenheit (1945–2010)], Poznań 2011, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in Belarus
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2009 CONTENTS Results of 2008 in the Sphere of Mass Media in Belarus …………………………………………………………………………… 3 Statistical Information ……………………………………………………… 7 Changes in Legislation ……………………………………………………… 8 Summons to the Prosecutor’s Office. Warnings Issued by the Prosecutor’s Office and by the Ministry of Information ………………………………………………………………………… 12 Attacks on Journalists, Detentions, Attempts of Pressure ……………………………………………………………………………... 17 Interference in Professional Independence of Editions. Censorship …………………………………………………………………………. 27 Infringements Related to Access to Information (Refusals to Grant Information, Restrictive Use of the Institute of Accreditation) …………………………………………….….. 29 Conflicts Related to Reception and Distribution of Foreign Information or Activity of Foreign Mass Media … 35 Economic Pressure, Obstacles to Printing and Distribution ………………………………………………………………………… 38 Conflicts Related to Elections …………………………………………. 45 Judicial conflicts with participation of mass media subjects ……………………………………………………………………………… 49 Mass-media in Belarus: 2008 Results of 2008 in the Sphere of Mass Media in Belarus The year 2008 has turned out difficult and ambiguous for the Belarusian journalism. Despite of some positive changes at the end of one year, the most important problems in the sphere of mass media (economic discredit of independent editions, discrepancy of legislation in the sphere of mass media to democratic standards, restrictions of access to information) have not been resolved. The first months of 2008 have been especially worrying. On January 18 deputy chief editor of the newspaper "Zhoda" Aliaksandr Zdvizhkou was sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment for «kindling of religious enmity» (Part 2, Article 130 of the Criminal Code). The newspaper was closed back in 2006 following the suit of the Ministry of information for reprinting some of the Danish caricatures featuring prophet Mohammad.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Schaarschmidt Mulit-Level Governance in Hitler's Germany
    www.ssoar.info Multi-Level Governance in Hitler's Germany: Reassessing the Political Structure of the National Socialist State Schaarschmidt, Thomas Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Schaarschmidt, T. (2017). Multi-Level Governance in Hitler's Germany: Reassessing the Political Structure of the National Socialist State. Historical Social Research, 42(2), 218-242. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.2.218-242 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51891-0 Multi-Level Governance in Hitler’s Germany: Reassessing the Political Structure of the National Socialist State ∗ Thomas Schaarschmidt Abstract: »Mehrebenenverwaltung im Nationalsozialismus: Eine Neubewer- tung der politischen Struktur des NS-Staats«. To explain the fatal efficiency and relative stability of the Nazi dictatorship, it is necessary to analyze how governmental institutions and society at various levels of the political system interacted. Contrary to the expectation that polycratic structures hampered administrative efficiency and tended to undermine well-established political structures it turns out that new models of governance evolved from the chaot- ic competition and short-lived cooperation of traditional administrations, party structures and newly created special institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Buildings and Urban Planning in Gdańsk/Danzig from 1933–1945
    kunsttexte.de/ostblick 3/2019 - 1 Ja!oda ?a5@ska-Kaczko &ublic .uildin!s and Brban &lannin! in "da#sk/$anzi! fro% 193321913 Few studies have discussed the Nazi influence on ar- formation of a Nazi-do%inated Denate that carried chitecture and urban lanning in "dańsk/Danzig.1 Nu- out orders fro% .erlin. /he Free Cit' of $anzi! was %erous &olish and "erman ublications on the city’s formall' under the 7ea!ue of Nations and unable to history, %onu%ent reservation, or *oint ublications run an inde endent forei!n olic') which was on architecture under Nazi rule offer only !eneral re- entrusted to the Fe ublic of &oland. However) its %arks on local architects and invest%ents carried out newl' elected !overn%ent had revisionist tendencies after 1933. +ajor contributions on the to ic include, a and i% le%ented a Jback ho%e to the FeichK %ono!ra h b' Katja .ernhardt on architects fro% the a!enda <0ei% ins Feich=. 4ith utter disre!ard for the /echnische 0ochschule $anzig fro% 1904–1945,2 rule of law) the new authorities banned o osition .irte &usback’s account of the restoration of historic and free ress) sought to alter the constitution) houses in the cit' fro% 1933–1939,3 a reliminary %ar!inalized the Volksta!) and curtailed the liberties stud' b' 4iesław "ruszkowski on unrealized urban of &olish and 8ewish citizens) the ulti%ate !oal bein! lanning rojects fro% the time of 4orld 4ar 66)1 their social and econo%ic exclusion. 6n so doin!) the which was later develo ed b' &iotr Lorens,3 an ex- Free Cit' of $anzi! sou!ht to beco%e one with the tensive reliminary stud' and %ono!ra h b' 8an Feich.
    [Show full text]
  • Domesticating the German East: Nazi Propaganda and Women's Roles in the “Germanization” of the Warthegau During World Wa
    DOMESTICATING THE GERMAN EAST: NAZI PROPAGANDA AND WOMEN’S ROLES IN THE “GERMANIZATION” OF THE WARTHEGAU DURING WORLD WAR II Madeline James A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the History Department in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Konrad Jarausch Karen Auerbach Karen Hagemann © 2020 Madeline James ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Madeline James: Domesticating the German East: Nazi Propaganda And Women’s Roles in the “Germanization” of the Warthegau during World War II (Under the direction of Konrad Jarausch and Karen Auerbach) This thesis utilizes Nazi women’s propaganda to explore the relationship between Nazi gender and racial ideology, particularly in relation to the Nazi Germanization program in the Warthegau during World War II. At the heart of this study is an examination of a paradox inherent in Nazi gender ideology, which simultaneously limited and expanded “Aryan” German women’s roles in the greater German community. Far from being “returned to the home” by the Nazis in 1933, German women experienced an expanded sphere of influence both within and beyond the borders of the Reich due to their social and cultural roles as “mothers of the nation.” As “bearers of German culture,” German women came to occupy a significant role in Nazi plans to create a new “German homeland” in Eastern Europe. This female role of “domesticating” the East, opposite the perceived “male” tasks of occupation, expulsion, and resettlement, entailed cultivating and reinforcing Germanness in the Volksdeutsche (ethnic German) communities, molding them into “future masters of the German East.” This thesis therefore also examines the ways in which Reich German women utilized the notion of a distinctly female cultural sphere to stake a claim in the Germanizing mission.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Germanization' in Occupied Poland: Disunity, Inconsistency, And
    Mosher ‘Germanization’ in Occupied Poland: Disunity, Inconsistency, and Contradiction within the Nazi Administration. BEN MOSHER Following the invasion of Poland in September 1939, the Nazi’s began a program designed to Germanize the territory in which they occupied. The Germanization program involved reordering Polish society, and its people, according to the requirements of Nazi racial theory, thus bringing it in line with Hitler’s vision for the German Reich. However, Hitler’s grand vision for Poland was not implemented with any uniformity, and the Germanization program was plagued by internal inconsistency and contradiction from the outset. Drawing upon Ian Kershaw’s work, this paper will advance a reconceptualization of Hitler’s role as leader of the Nazi administration, emphasizing his characteristic detachment from the everyday functions of the Nazi bureaucracy. Instead of working from the dictates of their Fuehrer, Nazi officials worked to advance Hitler’s general vision with their own personalized policies. As a consequence, in Poland, the Germanization program varied tremendously according to the personal judgment of individual Nazi administrators. This point is illustrated through an analysis of Hitler’s laissez-faire brand of administrative rule, the autonomous competition that was cultivated amongst Nazi officials, and the ambiguities associated with the ‘racial status’ of the Polish population. This paper demonstrates that the fragmented nature of the Nazi Germanization program stems from Hitler’s non-interventionist brand of leadership, which afforded district officials with the administrative autonomy to enact his vision as they saw fit. On October 8, 1939, Adolf Hitler issued the Annexation Decree, officially commencing what would become a 6-year Nazi occupation of Polish territory.
    [Show full text]