DOCSLIB.ORG

Rih[Llnevvs Release O KENNEDY SPACE CENTER FLORIDA ERONAUTICS and SPACE ADMINISTRATION RELEASE NO" KSC-1-68 II for RELEASE: Immediate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rih[Llnevvs Release O KENNEDY SPACE CENTER FLORIDA ERONAUTICS and SPACE ADMINISTRATION RELEASE NO rIH[llnevvs release o _KENNEDY SPACE CENTER FLORIDA ERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION RELEASE NO" KSC-1-68 II FOR RELEASE: Immediate January3, 1968 APOLLO/SATURN2 04 UNDERGOESPREFLIGHT TESTS KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla. -- The Apollo/Saturn 204 launch vehicle, toppedby the first flight-ready Lunar Module, is undergoingmajor prelaunchtests in preparationfor the unmannedApollo 5 mission, scheduledto take place no earlier than January 18. A combinedKSC-contractor launch teamconducts the checkout, headedby Launch Director Rocco Petroneand Launch Operations ManagerPaul Donnelly. Similar to the Lunar Module configuration that eventually will ferry Apollo astronauts to and from the moon's surface, LM-1 will be launchedfrom CapeKennedy's Complex37 into a near-earth orbit. The upratedSaturn 1 and its LM-1 Grumman-builtpayload underwenttests that verified compatibility betweenspace vehicle electrical and mechanicalsystems, Complex37 groundsupport equipmentand the Air Force Eastern Test Range. The space vehicle recordedsimulated prelaunchactivities through in-fl ight milestones, while on both external power(plugs-in) and internal power(plugs-out). A third major highlight, the Flight ReadinessTest, was conductedas an all- systemsverification of the total spacevehicle, paving the way for hypergolics to be loadedaboardthe spacecraft and launch vehicle upperstage. Additional testing will continue throughto about six days before liftoff, when the CountdownDemonstrationTest begins. The CDDT is a dress rehearsal for the actual launch countdown, which gets underwayafter a 32-hour recycle. - more - PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE, COCOA BEACH - 783-7781, KSC - 867-2467 _ KSC-1-68 -2- Duringthe nine-hour flight, the LM's ascent and descent stage engines will be fired twice, an abort simulated and all other on-board systemsthoroughly monitored. The LM will deploy from its adapterat approximately T plus 50 minutes, and the descent engine will be burnedthe first time some3 1/2 hours after liftoff. During an actual mannedlunar landing, the astronautswould fire the LM's descent stage engine to powertheir gradual descent to the moon's surface, and would activate the ascent stage engine for rendezvousingand docking with the commandmodule in lunar orbit. A LM abort would take place during a real lunar flight if the two-man crew decided to return to the orbiting command module before descending to the moon's surface. They would perform this maneuver by firing the LM's ascent stage engine, which will pull that stage away from the descent stage. Engineers on the ground will send a radio signal to the orbiting LM-1 to initiate the simulated abort, and will monitor its planned separation. One of the most critical systems that must be checked and maintained prior to launch is the LM's environmental control system, according to Larry Cervellino, special assistant to GrummanAircraft's project manager at the Spaceport, George Skurla. Spacecraft temperature must be maintained on the ground, according to Cervellino, so that the ECS does not overheat during liftoff and orbital insertion. Once in orbit, a heat exchanger takes over to sustain a 75-degree temperature. The first LM flight follows nearly five years' research and development. The design was conceived years before the Lunar Orbiter and Surveyor spacecraft returned hundreds of highly-detailed lunar photographs. LM-1 will be launched [rom Complex 37, last used more than 1 1/2 years ago for the Apollo/Saturn 203 mission. During the LM-1 preflight preparations, the Spaceport's probing Acceptance Checkout Equipment is automatically monitoring thousands of spacecraft systems, and radio linking these minute measurements from pad computers to data reduction and readout equipment at the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building. NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center is responsible for launch vehicle development. The Manned Space Flight Center has responsibility for the spacecraft. - more - KSC-I-68 .p The Apollo 5 spacevehicle stands about 181 feet, or some43 feet shorter than the standard uprated Saturn 1 space vehicle configuration. This height difference is due to the fact that the Apollo 5 launch vehicle will not betopped by the usual command-servicemodule. (The 32-thousand-pound LM and its adapterwill be capped by a protective covering which will detach following orbital insertion.) LM-1 does not contain an ablative heat shield and will burn up during reentry. It also will not be equippedwith the four landing pads similar to the type that eventually will be used for the mannedlunar touchdown. Key NASA launch personnelfor the upcomingmission include: Don Phillips, test supervisor; Bert Grenville, assistant test supervisor; GeneSestile, launch vehicle test conductor; andWilliam Criddle, spacecraft test conductor. Contractor stage and spacecraft test conductorsare: first stage: Ken Stewart, Chrysler; upperstage, John Latherow, Douglas; InstrumentUnit, Justin Hall and Donald Heins, International Business Machines and lunar module, James Harrington, Grumman. - end - RoSECSNCPN ENspCADMTFNLTADAsENOTcRE RELEAreSE lNO:eaKsSeC-2-68 FOR RELEASE: Immediate January 3), 1968 SEVERAL SPACEPORT FACILITIES COMPLETED DURING1967 KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla. -- Several major facilities at the Spaceportwere completedduring 1967. In the Industrial Areai additions were completedto the Flight CrewTraining Bui Iding, the Occupational Health Facility, the MannedSpacecraft Operations BuiIding, and the Heating Plant. The interim Visitor InformationCenterwas completed in July. The only major project still underconstruction in the Industrial Area is the addition to the HeadquartersBuilding. At Complex39, major construction projects included the press site, Pad B - the secondpad of Complex39-the Propellant Laboratory Complex, and the resurfacing of two parking lots. High Bay 2 in the Vehicle Assembly Bui Iding wherethe Apollo/ Saturn V spacecraft is assembled, and firing room 3 in the Launch Control Centerare being activated, f In addition, the Flight Crew Training Building, finished in July, now housesa secondApollo mission simulator, a documentationcenter, an operational area and storage space. Examinationrooms, laboratories and administrative offices were completedat the Occupational Health Facility in August, tripling the size of the facility. At the Manned SpacecraftOperations Building, a Lunar Module activation pro- ject involving the completion of a high pressuregas distribution system was completed in March. Additions and alterations were madeto the heating plant to accommodatea 16 million BTU boiler relocated from the VAB. The addition is essentially completeand will becomeoperational pendingtesting of the boiler. -more- PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE, COCOA BEACH - 783-7781, KSC- 867-2467 KSC'2-68 -2- The interim Visitor Information Center opened to the public August 1, consists of two buildings connected by a covered portico. The VIC features free lectures, ex- hibits and films on space exploration and technology, and serves as a terminal for con- ducted bus tours of the Space Center. Two wings being built at each end of the Headquarters Building are 70 percent finished and will provide 120,000 square feet of engineering and administrative space for KSC personnel now working in trailer offices. The project is scheduled for com- pletion in March. At Complex 39, the press site for viewing Saturn V launches was completed in April and inaugurated November 9 for Apollo 4. In addition to a covered bleacher view- ing area, the site also includes a communications terminal building and parking areas for vans owned by news media organizations. Basic construction on Pad B at Launch Complex 39 was finished in September. Although there are about 20 minor activation tanks presently being worked on, major ground support equipment systems are complete and are being used in the checkout of Mobile Launcher .3. The Propellant Systems Components Laboratory Complex was finished in August. In includes a propellant components lab, operations building, gaseous nitrogen charging station, de-ionized water plant, propellant-transporter repair and maintenance facility, propel lant-trai let parking areas and storage facilities. Two parking lots located behind the VAB low bay area were upgraded in November to provide an all-weather surface. The parking lots accommodate about 900 cars. About 80 percent of the construction effort in High Bay 2 of the VAB is expected to be completed this year. Interior architectural work is generally finished, and instal- lation of moveable platforms will be 50 percent complete by the end of the year. Three high rise elevators were installed in September. Electrical and mechanical systems will be checked out early next year. Construction in Firing Room 3 of the LCC consists of installation of communications and operational television systems. -end- r..elec..,e SKENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA ERONAUTiCS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION I • RELEASE NO, KSC-4-68 FOR RELEASE: Immediate January4, 1968 NASA SECRETARY RECALLS TRAVEL WITH JFK KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla. - - A younglady who once served President John F. Kennedyhopesto be on handherewhenthe space age commitmenthe made becomesreality. In 1961, the late President committedthis nation to landing men on the moon. Onefor whomthis presidential proclamationwould have special meaningwas Antoinette E. Hickey. That year she was a memberof the delegation that accompaniedMr. Kennedy to a meetingwith Russian Premier Khrushchevin Vienna. Today, as secretary to Miles Ross, Deputy Director for Center Operations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress Report on Apollo Program
    PROGRESS REPORT ON APOLLO PROGRAM Michael Collins, LCol. USAF (M) Astronaut NASA-MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER It is a great pleasure to be here today and to greet you hardy suMvors of the pool party. I will do my best to avoid loud noises and bright colors during my status report. Since the last SETP Symposium, the Apollo Program has been quite busy in a number of different areas. (Figure 1) My problem is to sift through this information and to talk only about those things of most interest to you. First, to review briefly our hardware, we are talking about two different spacecraft and two different boosters. (Figure 2) The Command Module is that part of the stack COLLINS which makes the complete round trip to the moon. Attached to it is the Service Module, containing expendables and a 20,000 pound thrust engine for maneuverability. The Lunar Module will be carried on later flights and is the landing vehicle and active rendezvous partner. The uprated Saturn I can put the Command and Service Modules into earth orbit; the Saturn V is required when the Lunar Module is added. Since the last symposium, we have flown the Command and Service Modules twice and the Lunar Module once, all unmanned. Apollo 4, the first Saturn V flight, was launched in November 1967. (Figure 3) The Saturn V did a beautiful, i.e. nominal, job of putting the spacecraft into earth parking orbit. After a coast period, the third stage (S-IVB by McDonnell Douglas) was ignited a second time, achieving a highly elliptical orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 1997 KSC Contact: Joel Wells KSC Release No
    January 6, 1997 KSC Contact: Joel Wells KSC Release No. 1-97 Note to Editors/News Directors: KSC TO CELEBRATE GRAND OPENING OF APOLLO/SATURN V CENTER JAN. 8 On Wednesday, Jan. 8, news media representatives will have several opportunities to interview former Apollo astronauts, NASA and KSC officials, and Space Shuttle astronauts at the new Apollo/Saturn V Center. From 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. members of the media will be able to interview several former Apollo astronauts at the Apollo/Saturn V Center. Media interested in conducting interviews during this time block must contact Melissa Tomasso, KSC Visitor Center, at (407) 449-4254 by close of business on Jan. 7. She will schedule all interview appointments. Media members should arrive at the KSC Press Site 30 minutes before their scheduled interview time for transport to the Apollo/Saturn V Center. In addition, a formal grand opening gala is planned for Wednesday evening. Several Apollo astronauts will also be available for interview at 6 p.m. at the Apollo/Saturn V Center. Media interested in this opportunity must be at the KSC Press Site by 5:30 p.m. for transport to the new facility. Invited guests and media wishing to attend the gala at the regular time will meet at the KSC Visitor Center (KSCVC) between 6:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. for transport to the Apollo/Saturn V Center. A tour of the new facility’s shows and exhibits is included. A ceremony featuring presentations from NASA Administrator Dan Goldin, KSC Director Jay Honeycutt, and former astronauts John Young and Eugene Cernan will begin at 8 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond
    Reproducible Master PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond GRADE 4 – 5 OBJECTIVES PAGE 1 Students will: ö Read Snoopy, First Beagle on the Moon! and Shoot for the Moon, Snoopy! ö Learn facts about the Apollo Moon missions. ö Use this information to complete a fill-in-the-blank fact worksheet. ö Create mission objectives for a brand new mission to the moon. SUGGESTED GRADE LEVELS 4 – 5 SUBJECT AREAS Space Science, History TIMELINE 30 – 45 minutes NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS ö 5-ESS1 ESS1.B Earth and the Solar System ö 3-5-ETS1 ETS1.B Developing Possible Solutions 21st CENTURY ESSENTIAL SKILLS Collaboration and Teamwork, Communication, Information Literacy, Flexibility, Leadership, Initiative, Organizing Concepts, Obtaining/Evaluating/Communicating Ideas BACKGROUND ö According to NASA.gov, NASA has proudly shared an association with Charles M. Schulz and his American icon Snoopy since Apollo missions began in the 1960s. Schulz created comic strips depicting Snoopy on the Moon, capturing public excitement about America’s achievements in space. In May 1969, Apollo 10 astronauts traveled to the Moon for a final trial run before the lunar landings took place on later missions. Because that mission required the lunar module to skim within 50,000 feet of the Moon’s surface and “snoop around” to determine the landing site for Apollo 11, the crew named the lunar module Snoopy. The command module was named Charlie Brown, after Snoopy’s loyal owner. These books are a united effort between Peanuts Worldwide, NASA and Simon & Schuster to generate interest in space among today’s younger children.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987 (5.2Mb Pdf)
    1'4evvs National Aeronautics and Space Administration JohnF.KennedySpace Center Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899 AC305 867-2468 , ... I For Release: David W. Garrett April 13, 1987 Headquarters, Washington, D.C. (Phone: 202/453-8400) RELEASE: 87-56 SHEEHAN NAMED ASSOCIATE AE_INISTRATOR FOR _NICATIONS William Sheehan has been appointed Associate Administrator for Cournnunications, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., effective May 4, 1987. This new position, announced in February 1987, reflects the importance that NASA management places on full and complete communications within and outside the agency. Sheehan will be the principal advisor to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator on public affairs matters. He will be responsible for policy level management and direction of NASA's public affairs, television development and internal communications organizat ions. Sheehan comes to NASA from The Executive Television Workshop, Inc., where he was director of the Detroit office. Prior to this position he was executive director, Corporate Public Affairs, Ford Motor Co. and vice president Public Affairs, Ford Aerospace and Corrrnunications Corp., Detroit. In 1974, Sheehan was appointed president of ABC News, a position he held until 1977. He had held various positions at ABC since 1961 including five years as a national and foreign correspondent. He was a radio and television anchorman, labor reporter and chief of ABC News' London bureau between 1961 and 1966. In 1966, he returned to New York to become vice president, Television News,_"';iseni.o.r _ vice president and then president, ABC News. Recently, Sheehan has been/working in public television on the local and national level as chairman of the board of station WTVS of Detroit and is a member of the board of directors and on the executive committee of the Public Broadcasting Service.
    [Show full text]
  • APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM by Jumes E
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7564 w= ro VI h d z c Q rn 4 z t APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM by Jumes E. Puulosky und Leslie G, St. Leger Ly12d012 B. Johlzson Space Center Honst0~2, Texus 77058 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, 0. C. JANUARY 1974 ~--_. - .. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. D-7564 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 1974 APOLLOEXPERIENCEREPORT THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM 6. Performing Organization Code I 7. Author(s) I 8. Performing Organization Report No. JSC S-383 James E. Pavlosky and Leslie G. St. Leger, JSC 10. Work Unit No. I 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 11. Contract or Grant No. Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code National Aeronautics and SDace Administration Washington, D. C. 20546 1 15. Supplementary Notes The JSC Director waived the use of the International System of Units (SI) for this Apollo Experienc Report because, in his judgment, the use of SI units would impair the usefulness of th'e report or result in excessive cost. 16. Abstract The Apollo command module was the first manned spacecraft to be designed to enter the atmos- phere of the earth at lunar-return velocity, and the design of the thermal protection subsystem for the resulting entry environment presented a major technological challenge. Brief descrip- tions of the Apollo command module thermal design requirements and thermal protection con- figuration, and some highlights of the ground and flight testing used for design verification of the system are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
    Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region August 2008 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN MERRITT ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Brevard and Volusia Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 3 U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 4 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 4 Legal Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 5 National Conservation Plans and Initiatives .................................................................................6 Relationship to State Partners .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Are Edited Excerpts from Two Interviews Conducted with Dr
    Interviews with Dr. Wernher von Braun Editor's note: The following are edited excerpts from two interviews conducted with Dr. Wernher von Braun. Interview #1 was conducted on August 25, 1970, by Robert Sherrod while Dr. von Braun was deputy associate administrator for planning at NASA Headquarters. Interview #2 was conducted on November 17, 1971, by Roger Bilstein and John Beltz. These interviews are among those published in Before This Decade is Out: Personal Reflections on the Apollo Program, (SP-4223, 1999) edited by Glen E. Swanson, whick is vailable on-line at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4223/sp4223.htm on the Web. Interview #1 In the Apollo Spacecraft Chronology, you are quoted as saying "It is true that for a long time we were not in favor of lunar orbit rendezvous. We favored Earth orbit rendezvous." Well, actually even that is not quite correct, because at the outset we just didn't know which route [for Apollo to travel to the Moon] was the most promising. We made an agreement with Houston that we at Marshall would concentrate on the study of Earth orbit rendezvous, but that did not mean we wanted to sell it as our preferred scheme. We weren't ready to vote for it yet; our study was meant to merely identify the problems involved. The agreement also said that Houston would concentrate on studying the lunar rendezvous mode. Only after both groups had done their homework would we compare notes. This agreement was based on common sense. You don't start selling your scheme until you are convinced that it is superior.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 13 Mission Review
    APOLLO 13 MISSION REVIEW HEAR& BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS SECOR’D SESSION JUR’E 30, 1970 Printed for the use of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47476 0 WASHINGTON : 1970 COMMITTEE ON AEROKAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES CLINTON P. ANDERSON, New Mexico, Chairman RICHARD B. RUSSELL, Georgia MARGARET CHASE SMITH, Maine WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washington CARL T. CURTIS, Nebraska STUART SYMINGTON, bfissouri MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon JOHN STENNIS, Mississippi BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona STEPHEN M.YOUNG, Ohio WILLIAM B. SAXBE, Ohio THOJfAS J. DODD, Connecticut RALPH T. SMITH, Illinois HOWARD W. CANNON, Nevada SPESSARD L. HOLLAND, Florida J4MES J. GEHRIG,Stad Director EVERARDH. SMITH, Jr., Professional staffMember Dr. GLENP. WILSOS,Professional #tad Member CRAIGVOORHEES, Professional Staff Nember WILLIAMPARKER, Professional Staff Member SAMBOUCHARD, Assistant Chief Clerk DONALDH. BRESNAS,Research Assistant (11) CONTENTS Tuesday, June 30, 1970 : Page Opening statement by the chairman, Senator Clinton P. Anderson-__- 1 Review Board Findings, Determinations and Recommendations-----_ 2 Testimony of- Dr. Thomas 0. Paine, Administrator of NASA, accompanied by Edgar M. Cortright, Director, Langley Research Center and Chairman of the dpollo 13 Review Board ; Dr. Charles D. Har- rington, Chairman, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel ; Dr. Dale D. Myers, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, and Dr. Rocco A. Petrone, hpollo Director -___________ 21, 30 Edgar 11. Cortright, Chairman, hpollo 13 Review Board-------- 21,27 Dr. Dale D. Mvers. Associate Administrator for Manned SDace 68 69 105 109 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIOSS 1. Internal coinponents of oxygen tank So. 2 ---_____-_________________ 22 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Project: Apollo 8
    v ._. I / I NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TELS WO 2-4155 NEWS WASHINGTON,D.C.20546 • WO 3-6925 FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY December 15, 1968 RELEASE NO: 68.208 P PROJECT: APOLLO 8 R E contents GENERAL RELEASE----------~-------~·~-~-~--~~----~----~-~--~-l-lO MISSION OBJECTIVES------------------------------------------11 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS-------------~-------------~----~----~--~~12-14 5 Launch W1ndow~~-~----~--~-~--~-------~-----~---------w--~-14 MISSION DESCRIPTION-----------------------------------------15-19 FLIGHT PLAN--~---~-----·------------~------~----~---~----~--20-23 ALTERNATE MISSIONS---------------------------------~--------24-26 5 ABORT MODES-----~--------------~--~--~------------~---~~--~-27~29 PHOTOGRAPHIC TASKS------------------------------------------30-32 SPACECRAFT STRUCTURE SYSTEMS--------------------------------33-37 SATURN V LAUNCH VEHICLE-------------------------------------38-50 APOLLO 8 LAUNCH OPERATIONS----------------------------------51.64 MISSION CONTROL CENTER--------------------------------------65-66 MANNED SPACE FLIGHT NETWORK---------------------------------67-71 APOLLO 8 RECOVERY-------------------------------------------72-73 APOLLO 8 CREW-------------~--~--~~-~~---~---~~~-------------74-86 K LUNAR DESCRIPTION-------------------------------------------87-88 APOLLO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/CONTRACTORS---~-------------------39-94 I APOLLO 8 GLOSSARY-------- -----------------------------------95-101 T -0- 12/6/68 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WO 2-4155 NEWS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 TELS.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)
    chl APOLLO OVER THE MOON: A VIEW FROM ORBIT (NASA SP-362) Chapter 1 - Introduction Harold Masursky, Farouk El-Baz, Frederick J. Doyle, and Leon J. Kosofsky [For a high resolution picture- click here] Objectives [1] Photography of the lunar surface was considered an important goal of the Apollo program by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The important objectives of Apollo photography were (1) to gather data pertaining to the topography and specific landmarks along the approach paths to the early Apollo landing sites; (2) to obtain high-resolution photographs of the landing sites and surrounding areas to plan lunar surface exploration, and to provide a basis for extrapolating the concentrated observations at the landing sites to nearby areas; and (3) to obtain photographs suitable for regional studies of the lunar geologic environment and the processes that act upon it. Through study of the photographs and all other arrays of information gathered by the Apollo and earlier lunar programs, we may develop an understanding of the evolution of the lunar crust. In this introductory chapter we describe how the Apollo photographic systems were selected and used; how the photographic mission plans were formulated and conducted; how part of the great mass of data is being analyzed and published; and, finally, we describe some of the scientific results. Historically most lunar atlases have used photointerpretive techniques to discuss the possible origins of the Moon's crust and its surface features. The ideas presented in this volume also rely on photointerpretation. However, many ideas are substantiated or expanded by information obtained from the huge arrays of supporting data gathered by Earth-based and orbital sensors, from experiments deployed on the lunar surface, and from studies made of the returned samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Accident in a Rogers Commission Hearing at KSC
    CHALLENGER By Arnold D. Aldrich Former Program Director, NSTS August 27, 2008 Recently, I was asked by John Shannon, the current Space Shuttle Program Manager, to comment on my experiences, best practices, and lessons learned as a former Space Shuttle program manager. This project is part of a broader knowledge capture and retention initiative being conducted by the NASA Johnson Space Center in an “oral history” format. One of the questions posed was to comment on some of the most memorable moments of my time as a Space Shuttle program manager. Without question, the top two of these were the launch of Challenger on STS‐51L on January 28, 1986, and the launch of Discovery on STS‐26 on September 29, 1988. Background The tragic launch and loss of Challenger occurred over 22 years ago. 73 seconds into flight the right hand Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) broke away from the External Tank (ET) as a result of a burn‐ through in its aft most case to case joint and the Space Shuttle vehicle disintegrated resulting in the total loss of the vehicle and crew. The events leading up to that launch are still vivid in my mind and deeply trouble me to this day, as I know they always will. This paper is not about what occurred during the countdown leading up to the launch – those facts and events were thoroughly investigated and documented by the Rogers Commission. Rather, what I can never come to closure with is how we, as a launch team, and I, as one of the leaders of that team, allowed the launch to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Oral History Transcript
    NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT FAROUK EL-BAZ INTERVIEWED BY REBECCA WRIGHT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS – NOVEMBER 2, 2009 WRIGHT: Today is November 2, 2009. This oral history interview is being conducted with Dr. Farouk El-Baz in Boston, Massachusetts, for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. Interviewer is Rebecca Wright, assisted by Jennifer Ross-Nazzal. We certainly would like to start by telling you thank you. We know you‘re a very busy person with a very busy schedule, so thank you for finding time for us today. EL-BAZ: You‘re welcome to come here, because this is part of the history of the United States. It‘s important that we all chip in. WRIGHT: We‘re glad to hear that. We know your work with NASA began as early as 1967 when you became employed by Bellcomm [Incorporated]. Could you share with us how you learned about that opportunity and how you made that transition into becoming an employee there? EL-BAZ: Just the backdrop, I finished my PhD here in the US. First job offer was from Germany. It was in June 1964; I was teaching there [at the University of Heidelberg] until December 1965. I went to Egypt then, tried to get a job in geology. I was unable for a whole year, so I came back to the US as an immigrant in the end of 1966. For the first three months of 1967, I began to search for a job. When I arrived in the winter, most of the people that I knew 2 November 2009 1 Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Farouk El-Baz were at universities, and most universities had hired the people that would teach during the year.
    [Show full text]