DOCSLIB.ORG

Sams Valley Reinforcement Project Draft EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sams Valley Reinforcement Project Draft EA United States Department ofthe Interior BUREAU OF LA ND l\lANAGEl\IENT ;\lt'dford Di~tri ct Offi t'e :\().1() 13iclcllt• Road Medford. Ort•i!on !)7:i0-1 email ncldrcss: I3Ll\1 OR_:\TO ;\lai]ublm.~o,· l:S: REPL'i 1rnrnH TO. ~!~I/ 1 7 2016 1792(0R MOSO) Dear Interested Public: The Butte Fal Is Resource Area, Medford District Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has completed the environmental analysis for the proposed Sams Valley Rei nforcement Project. This letter is to inform you that the Sams Valley Reinforcement Project Environmental Assessment (EA) is available for your review on the Pac ific Power's project website at: https://www.pacificpower.net/ed/tp/sams-valley.html and BLM's national register website at: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front­ office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=renderDefaultPlanOrProjcctSite&projectI d=53292&dctmld=Ob0003e88091174 I. The EA analyzed the following activities proposed on ELM-administered lands located between Sams Valley, nonhwcst of the city of Medford, and Grants Pass, Oregon in the Grants Pass­ Rogue River, Evans Creek, and Gold Gill-Rogue River 5th field watersheds (sec attached map). The Sams Valley Reinforcement Project Arca is located on SLM-administered lands in T. 35S. R. 2 and 3W; T. 36S, R. 2, 3, and 4W; and T. 36N, R SW., Wi llamette Meridian; Jackson County, Oregon. What is the Sam's Va lley Rein fo rcement Project? Pacific Power proposes to construct, operate, and maintai n a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line which will run from the existing Grants Pass Substation in Josephine County near Grants Pass, Oregon cast to a proposed new 500-kV substation in Jackson Count y, Oregon north or Medford (sec maps). The addi tional transmission line on BLM would be constructed as part of a double circuit with the existing 11 5 kV li ne. Thi s double circuit line will carry both the existing 115-kV line and the new 230 kV line on new poles and take advantage of' the existing right-of­ way to greatest extent possible. Pacifi c Power applied fo r an amendment to a ri ght-of-way grant they currently hold to accom modate the addition of a 230 kilovolt (kV) transmi ssion line along an existing route that would cross lands managed by BLM. The power line runs between an existing substation near Grants Pass and a new proposed substation site on private lands in Sams Valley for a di stance of' approximately 18 mil es; 4.6 mi les crosses BLM-admini stered lands and the remai nder crosses private lands. The BLM is proposing to expand the right-of-way width along the 4.6 miles of existing power line ri ght-of-way from I 00 feet to 135 feet. /\n additional 4. 7 miles of line between the new substation and the ex isting Whetstone Substation would have conductors replaced; the right-of-way width would not be expanded along this section. The BLM's decision will on ly address the 4.6 miles that cross BLM land. The I3LM docs not have jurisdiction to authorize any actions on non-federal lands. The majority ofthe project (approximately 75%), including the new substation site, would be located on private land. For portions ofthe project that cross private land, additional right-of­ way easements would be negotiated with landowners. The new substation would be located on private land owned by Pacific Power. The 30-day comment period for this EA will begin when the legal notice is published in the Medford Mail Tribune newspaper on November 21, 2016. Any comments you may have regarding this project must be received by December 21, 2016 to be considered in final decisions for this proposal. Please send your comments to the Bureau of Land Management, Attention: Tony Kerwin, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, OR 97504, or e-mail your comments to [email protected] (Attention: Tony Kerwin). You may also submit comments through the BLM's national register website by selecting "Comment on Document" in the Documents section ofthe webpage for this EA. Questions on the proposed project should be directed to Tony Kerwin at 541-618-2402. Please note that all written submissions from private individuals in response to this notice, including your name, address, telephone number, email address, or other personal identifying information may be made available for public inspection and disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, unless you specifically request confidentiality. If you wish to withhold your personal identifying information from public review or disclosure, you must state this at the beginning ofyour written comment and provide justification for doing so. We will honor such requests to the extent allowed by law, but you should be aware that release ofthat information may be required under certain circumstances. All submissions from organizations or businesses and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials oforganization or business will be made available for public inspection and disclosure in their entirety. Thank you for your continued interest in the Sams Valley Reinforcement Project. Your input plays an important role in our land management decisions. Sincerely, _____.,) \ ~ fVv'reresa J. Tnilock Field Manager Butte Falls Resource Area Enclosure Environmental Assessment Sams Valley Reinforcement Project DOI-BLM-ORWA-M050-2016-0002-EA Jackson and Josephine Counties November 2016 Environmental Assessment Sams Valley Reinforcement Project Contents 1 Purpose of and Need for Action ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Summary of Proposed Project ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1-4 1.3.1 Proponent .................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3.2 System Modeling ....................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Lead and Cooperating Agency ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.6 Decisions to be Made ............................................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.1 Bureau of Land Management .................................................................................... 1-6 1.6.2 Cooperating Agency .................................................................................................. 1-6 1.7 Authorizations, Permits, Reviews, and Approvals ................................................................. 1-6 1.8 Scoping and Public Involvement ............................................................................................ 1-7 1.8.1 Issues and Concerns................................................................................................. 1-8 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Alternatives Considered in Detail ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action ................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Proposed Action Components ............................................................................................. 2-10 2.3.1 Right-of-Way Acquisition ......................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.2 Access ..................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.3.3 Staging Areas .......................................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.4 Transmission Facilities ............................................................................................ 2-13 2.3.5 Substations .............................................................................................................. 2-18 2.3.6 System Maintenance ............................................................................................... 2-19 2.3.7 Vegetation Clearing and Management.................................................................... 2-19 2.3.8 Project Design Features .......................................................................................... 2-21 2.4 Summary of Environmental Impacts of Alternatives ............................................................ 2-26 2.5 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study .............................................. 2-32 2.5.1 Transmission Route Alternatives ............................................................................ 2-32 2.5.2 Substation Siting Alternatives ................................................................................. 2-32 3 Affected Environment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Click Here to Download the 4Th Grade Curriculum
    Copyright © 2014 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. All rights reserved. All materials in this curriculum are copyrighted as designated. Any republication, retransmission, reproduction, or sale of all or part of this curriculum is prohibited. Introduction Welcome to the Grand Ronde Tribal History curriculum unit. We are thankful that you are taking the time to learn and teach this curriculum to your class. This unit has truly been a journey. It began as a pilot project in the fall of 2013 that was brought about by the need in Oregon schools for historically accurate and culturally relevant curriculum about Oregon Native Americans and as a response to countless requests from Oregon teachers for classroom- ready materials on Native Americans. The process of creating the curriculum was a Tribal wide effort. It involved the Tribe’s Education Department, Tribal Library, Land and Culture Department, Public Affairs, and other Tribal staff. The project would not have been possible without the support and direction of the Tribal Council. As the creation was taking place the Willamina School District agreed to serve as a partner in the project and allow their fourth grade teachers to pilot it during the 2013-2014 academic year. It was also piloted by one teacher from the Pleasant Hill School District. Once teachers began implementing the curriculum, feedback was received regarding the effectiveness of lesson delivery and revisions were made accordingly. The teachers allowed Tribal staff to visit during the lessons to observe how students responded to the curriculum design and worked after school to brainstorm new strategies for the lessons and provide insight from the classroom teacher perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Environment of Native Inhabitants of Southwestern Oregon, Late Prehistoric Era
    Overview of the Environment of Native Inhabitants of Southwestern Oregon, Late Prehistoric Era Research and Writing by Reg Pullen Pullen Consulting RR 2 Box 220 Bandon,OR 97411 TELEPHONE: (503) 347-9542 Report Prepared for USDA Forest Service Rogue River National Forest, Medford, Oregon Siskiyou National Forest, Grants Pass, Oregon DOI Bureau of Land Management Medford District Office, Medford, Oregon 1996 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was directed by Janet Joyer of the United States Forest Service (Grants Pass), and Kate Winthrop of the Bureau of Land Management (Medford). Both provided great assistance in reviewing drafts of the manuscript, as did Jeff LeLande of the United States Forest Service (Medford). Individuals from three southwest Oregon Native American tribes participated in the collection of ethnographic and historic data contained in the report and appendix. Robert Kentta of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians reviewed ethnographic material from the John Harrington collection. Don Whereat of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians provided extensive help with records from the National Archives, Bancroft Library, and the Melville Jacobs collection. Troy Anderson of the Coquille Tribe helped to review materials relating to his tribe found in the Melville Jacobs collection. The staff of the Bancroft Library at the University of California at Berkeley helped to track down several early journals and diaries relating to the historic exploration of southwest Oregon. Gary Lundell of the University of Washington helped to locate pertinent materials in the Melville Jacobs collection. The staff at the Coos Bay Public Library assisted in accessing sources in their Oregon collection and through interlibrary loan.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF M. Susan Van Laere for the degreeof Master of Arts in Applied Anthropologypresented on March 6, 2000. Title: The Grizzly Bear andthe Deer: The History of Federal Indian Policy and Its Impacton the Coast Reservation Tribes of Oregon, 1856-1877. Abstract Approved Redacted for privacy David R. Brauner The Coast Reservation of Oregonwas established under Executive Order of President Franklin Pierce in November,1855, as a homeland for the southern Oregon tribes. It was an immense, isolatedwilderness, parts of which had burned earlier inthe century. There were some prairies where farmingwas possible, but because the reservation system itself and farming,particularly along the coast,were unknown entities, life for the Indianswas a misery for years. Those responsible for the establishmentof the reservation were subject to the vagaries of the weather, the wilderness,the Congress, and the Office of Indian Affairs. Agents were accountable, not only forthe lives of Oregon Indians, but also for allof the minute details involved in answeringto a governmental agency. Some of the agentswere experienced with the tribes ofwestern Oregon; others were not. All of them believedthat the only way to keep the Indiansfrom dying out was to teach them theEuropean American version of agriculturalism.Eventually, if possible, Oregon Indians would be assimilated into the dominant culture. Mostagents held out little hope for the adults of the tribes. This thesis lays out the background for thedevelopment of United States Indian policies. European Americans' etimocentricideas about what constituted civilization became inextricablywoven into those policies. Those policies were brought in their infant stage to Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • A “Most Disastrous” Affair
    Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Southern Oregon University Laboratory A “Most Disastrous” Affair The Battle of Hungry Hill, Historical Memory, and the Rogue River War MARK AXEL TVESKOV “Do you know the story of the Battle of Hungry Hill? A woman—Queen Mary — led the Native Americans from horseback, and her booming voice could be heard across the battlefield. They won that battle”1 — Coquille elder George Bundy Wasson Jr., 1994 IN EARLY NOVEMBER 1855, news reached the Willamette Valley of a defeat suffered by a force of Oregon territorial volunteers and two compa- nies of the U.S. Army’s First Regiment of U.S. Dragoons at the hands of the Takelma in the remote mountains of southern Oregon.2 A correspondent for the Oregon Statesman newspaper reported: The war in the South has become a real and earnest affair. The battle in the Grave Creek hills has proved most disastrous to our side. It is supposed that there were not more than 100 fighting Indians engaged in the action. On our side were over 300 volunteers and more than 100 regulars. The loss on the side of the Indians was very trifling, probably not more than 7 or 8 killed. The Indians had taken a position in the mountains, about 15 miles west of the road to Jacksonville — an almost inaccessible place. After two days of [the] hard- est kind of fighting the Indians were left in possession of the field. In about ten days it is proposed to renew the attack. The exterminators are rather down in the mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of the Confederated Tribes of The
    TERMINATION OF THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON: POLITICS, COMMUNITY, IDENTITY by DAVID GENE LEWIS A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department ofAnthropology and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy March 2009 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation ofApproval and Acceptance ofDissertation prepared by: David Lewis Title: "Termination ofthe Confederated Tribes ofthe Grand Ronde Community ofOregon: Politics, Community, Identity" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the Doctor ofPhilosophy degree in the Department of Anthropology by: Lynn Stephen, Chairperson, Anthropology Philip Young, Member, Anthropology Brian Klopotek, Member, Anthropology Deanna Kingston, Member, Not from U of 0 Jeffrey Ostler, Outside Member, History and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University ofOregon. March 20, 2009 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 © 2009 David Gene Lewis IV An Abstract ofthe Dissertation of David Gene Lewis for the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy in the Department ofAnthropology to be taken March 2009 Title: TERMINATION OF THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON: POLITICS, COMMUNITY, IDENTITY Approved: _ Lynn Stephen In 1954, one hundred years after the western Oregon Indians were removed to the Grand Ronde Reservation; the antecedent peoples were subjected to the final effort by the United States to colonize the remainder oftheir lands through Federal termination policy. The permanent Grand Ronde Reservation, settled in 1855 and established by presidential executive order in 1857, was terminated by Congress, and the tribal people lost their Federal recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • 131P. MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 999 RC 005 938 AUTHOR Hewlett, Leroy, Ed. TITLE Indians of Oregon;ABibliography of Materials in the Oregon State Library. INSTITUTION Oregon State Library, Salem. PUB DATE 69 NOTE 131p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS American Indian Languages; *AmericanIndians; *Bibliographies; *Cultural Background; Government Role; History;*LibraryCollections; Mythology; *Reference Materials IDENTIFIERS Northwest ABSTRACT Over 1300 publications are citedin this bibliography on the American Indiansof Oregon. The citations representthe Oregon State Library collection of materials onIndians of the Pacific Northwest. Although the emphasis is onIndians of Oregon, materials about the Indians of California, Idaho,Montana, Washington, and British Columbia are cited if inf ormationpertinent to the Indians of Oregon is also represented.Citations of various types of materials (books, periodical articles, pamphlets,Government publications, and some newspaper art3.cles)published in the 19th and 20th centuries are included. Some of the documents publishedin the 19th century are valuable as primary source material, as are someof the diaries and manuscript materials,' reprinted in the',Oregon Historical Quarterly.', The bibliography was prepared as 'lacomprehensive, up-to-date research tool to aid researchers andstudents in the search for references on the Indians of Oregon. (JH) 1 U S DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HASBEEN REPRO DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVEDFROM THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEWOR OPIN IONS STATED DO NOTNECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICEOF EDU CATION POSITION OR POLICY `S. I r, e trrtn. "I ":4 ,%='0 .1 -"Ale ;;) TRUSTEES of the OREGON STATE LIBRARY William P. Murnford, Chairman HowArd C.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Culture and History
    Our Culture and History The Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians By Don Whereat with Patty Whereat Phillips, Melody Caldera, Ron Thomas, Reg Pullan and Stephen Dow Beckham The Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians Our Culture and History He’ihl Tamahlis ta Laqauwiyat’as Our History and Culture~Hanis Language Namhliitnhl Nishchima’muu Customs, History ~ Siuslaw Language Laqauwiyat’as Culture ~ Milluk Language By Don Whereat with contributing articles by Patty Whereat Phillips, Melody Caldera, Ron Thomas, Reg Pullan and Stephen Dow Beckham Copyright © 2010 by Don Whereat. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from Don Whereat. None of the articles written by Dr. Stephen Dow Beckham, Patty Whereat Phillips, Reg Pullman, Rob Thomas, and Melody Caldera may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the authors. This book is printed by ii ABOUT THE BOOK COVER The cover painting is based on the “Five Bears” story (page 315) and painted by Pam Stoehsler for this book. This story, which is at least many hundreds of years old, is important to the Siuslaw People. The cover for this book was inspired by an experience Don Whereat had many years ago while driving south on Highway 101. This experience had a lasting and profound impression on him.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans of the Rogue Valley with a Focus on the Ashland Area
    An introduction to the Native Americans of the Rogue Valley with a Focus on the Ashland Area North Mountain Park Nature Center A division of the Ashland Parks and Recreation Department November 2012 About this Booklet This booklet is intended as an educational piece for park visitors, classroom teachers and others who are interested in learning about the indigenous inhabitants of this region. Although based on numerous ethnographies, historical accounts, archaeological records, and the input of tribal people today, this booklet is not meant to be a scholarly document, rather, the purpose of this booklet is to form a general picture of what life was like for the Native Americans who lived in and around Ashland prior to, and following contact with, Euro-Americans, including their role as long-term stewards of this region. The events that occurred during the 19th century and the impact they have had on the land and people of this region are still being felt today. For tribal people, whose ancestors resided in the Rogue Valley for thousands of years, it is about maintaining a relationship with their homeland while moving forward in a new land. For others, it is about trying to learn from the past while looking toward a better, more sustainable and more honorable future for everyone. Nature Center staff are grateful to all of the people who have contributed to the writing of this booklet and to the efforts of artists Irene Brady and Nancy Wylie. Top left cover photo by Michelle Alaimo/Smoke Signals North Mountain Park Nature Center 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERVIEW Of
    PREHISTORY and HISTORY of the ROGUE RIVER NATIONALFOREST: A CULTURALRESOURCE OVERVIEW Forest Service USDA Pacific Northwest Region Rogue River National Forest PREHISTORY and HISTORY of the ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST A CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERVIEW by: Jeffrey M. LaLande Cultural Resource Specialist Rogue River National Forest Medford, Oregon June 1980 CR Job RR-280 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This volume is an attempt to compile a narrative review of what is known about the human past of a portion of southwestern Oregon and northwestern California -- an area now eiithraced within the boundaries of the Rogue River National Forest -- and to provide some direction relative to the continuing management of the physical evidence of that past -- the Forest's cultural resources. The Overview resulted from several years of archival research and field work. Much of it was accomplished as part ofa wide variety of site- specific cultural resource inventory projects undertaken by the U. S. Forest Service. This document is intended to be of both wide-enough scope and adequate detail so thatit will havea long life asa useful cultural resource management tool. A number of persons have helped to bring the Overview to completion. Among them are Donald H. Smith, Forest Supervisor, who has encouraged the Rogue's endeavors in cultural resource management; Bob R. Lichlyter (Recreation Staff Officer) and Lawrence D. Wheeler (Land Management Planning StaffOfficer), both of whomallocated to theprojectthe necessary financial as well as moral support. Dorothy Newell(Resources Section) typed the rough draft and the final, photo-ready copy for publication.Gary Handschug (Forest Illustrator) assisted with the graphics; he and Marilynn Pantel (Forester) helped to prepare the document for printing.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistorical Overview of Groups with Ties to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
    An Ethnohistorical Overview of Groups with Ties to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site Douglas Deur 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D., College of Forest Resources, University of Washington and Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit National Park Service, Pacific West Region Seattle, Washington Research and report production done under Cooperative Agreement between the Pacific West Region, National Park Service and the College of Forest Resources, University of Washington: Cooperative Agreement No. CA 9088A008; and, Task Agreement No. J9W88050025. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series Publication Number 2011-12 Frederick F. York, Ph.D. Regional Anthropologist and Social Science Series Editor Northwest Cultural Resources Institute Report No. 15 The cover image was cropped at the bottom to delete the caption “Interior of Blackfoot Lodge,” which is incorrect. The entire image is represented above. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methods 5 Before the Hudson’s Bay Company 9 Questions of Tribal Affiliation in the Chinookan Realm 17 The Cascades 26 Clackamas 29 Multnomah 31 Skillute 32 Cowlitz, Klickitat, and other Area Tribes 33 “A Sort of Communal Range”: A Case for Overlapping Claims 35 The Configuration of the Fort Vancouver Community 39 Navigating Trade Networks and Mutual Interests 43 Defense and Punishment on the Northwestern Frontier 51 Society and Structure in the Fort Vancouver Community 56 Strategic Marriages between HBC Employees and Native Women 61 The Unique Roles of Iroquois and Cree Employees 73 “The Greater Part
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L, Jordan Cove Energy Project Draft
    APPENDIX L Cultural Resources Appendix Jordan Cove Energy Project Draft EIS This appendix provides additional information pertaining to the cultural context of the Jordan Cove LNG Project and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Jordan Cove Energy Project Project, or Project) as well as additional details of consultations conducted thus far under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), surveys conducted for the Project, and cultural resources identified by those surveys. Specifically, it includes the following sections related to section 4.11 of this EIS: 1. Ethnohistoric Context of Native Occupations in Southern Oregon for the Jordan Cove Energy Project 2. Tables of Communications with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) a. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Consultations b. Applicant Communications 3. Tables of Communications with Indian Tribes a. FERC Consultations b. Applicant Communications i. Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P. ii. Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, L.P. 4. Brief History of Archaeological Studies in the Project Region 5. Narrative of Previous Overviews, Surveys, and Testing Completed for the Jordan Cove LNG Project 6. Table of Previously Recorded Sites Along the Proposed Pacific Connector Pipeline Route 7. Table of Sites Identified on Federal Lands Along the Proposed Pacific Connector Pipeline Route 8. Table of Sites Where Additional Investigations Recommended Along the Proposed Pacific Connector Pipeline Route 9. Table of Sites and Site Leads Identified Within the Proposed Jordan Cove LNG Project Area of Potential Effects (APE) 10. Table of Sites Identified Along the Proposed Pacific Connector Pipeline Route APE 11. References L-1 Appendix L – Cultural Resources Draft EIS Jordan Cove Energy Project Ethnohistoric Context of Native Occupations in Southern Oregon for the Jordan Cove Energy Project Below, we discuss the Indian tribes that historically occupied or used the Project area.
    [Show full text]