Overview of the Environment of Native Inhabitants of Southwestern Oregon, Late Prehistoric Era

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Overview of the Environment of Native Inhabitants of Southwestern Oregon, Late Prehistoric Era Overview of the Environment of Native Inhabitants of Southwestern Oregon, Late Prehistoric Era Research and Writing by Reg Pullen Pullen Consulting RR 2 Box 220 Bandon,OR 97411 TELEPHONE: (503) 347-9542 Report Prepared for USDA Forest Service Rogue River National Forest, Medford, Oregon Siskiyou National Forest, Grants Pass, Oregon DOI Bureau of Land Management Medford District Office, Medford, Oregon 1996 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was directed by Janet Joyer of the United States Forest Service (Grants Pass), and Kate Winthrop of the Bureau of Land Management (Medford). Both provided great assistance in reviewing drafts of the manuscript, as did Jeff LeLande of the United States Forest Service (Medford). Individuals from three southwest Oregon Native American tribes participated in the collection of ethnographic and historic data contained in the report and appendix. Robert Kentta of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians reviewed ethnographic material from the John Harrington collection. Don Whereat of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians provided extensive help with records from the National Archives, Bancroft Library, and the Melville Jacobs collection. Troy Anderson of the Coquille Tribe helped to review materials relating to his tribe found in the Melville Jacobs collection. The staff of the Bancroft Library at the University of California at Berkeley helped to track down several early journals and diaries relating to the historic exploration of southwest Oregon. Gary Lundell of the University of Washington helped to locate pertinent materials in the Melville Jacobs collection. The staff at the Coos Bay Public Library assisted in accessing sources in their Oregon collection and through interlibrary loan. Other individuals who provided assistance through their comments, reviews, and/or help in locating relevant data include Thomas Atzet of the United States Forest Service (Grants Pass), Richard Drehobl and Larry Zowada of the Bureau of Land Management (Medford), and Ken Wilson of the United States Forest Service (Eureka, California). Table of Contents Pagzes Executive Summary 1-4 Map of the Study Area 5 1. Objectives and Purpose I-1 to I-2 2. Research Questions and Problems 11-1 to 11-5 3. Environmental Overview III-1 to 11-3 4. Cultural Overview IV-1 to IV-21 5. Land Management Overview V-1 to V-17 Table of Use of Fire follows 6. Native Environment VI-1 to VI-20 Table of Vegetative Cover follows 7. Recommendations VII-1-VII-2 Bibliography Appendix Index to Appendix I-EI I. Cultural Overview, including subsistence 11. Land Management Overview, including use of fire III. Native Environment, including historic references I Executive Summnary This project provides a comprehensive study of the native ecosystems of the Applegate and Illinois River watersheds of southwestern Oregon. Research conducted shows that the native people inhabiting this area combined trading I networks, inter-tribal marriage, careful resource and land management practices and additional skills to encourage the bio-diversity and food production necessary to survive. U The Applegate and Illinois Rivers of southwestern Oregon have their headwaters in the Siskiyou Mountains that separate Oregon and California. Both rivers flow in a northwesterly direction to confluences with the Rogue River, and are part of one of the largest drainage basins in Oregon. Much of the Applegate River was inhabited prehistorically by the Da-ku-be-te- J de people and the upper Illinois River by the Gu-sla-dada. These groups spoke dialects of the same language, Athapascan, and shared many cultural attributes. Both groups utilized large portions of their respective drainage basins in the quest for food and other resources. They also actively managed portions of the landscape, through the use of fire and manipulation of root and seed crops, in an I effort to maintain a desirable environment in which to live. This landscape reflected their presence in the form of a greater diversity of habitats, a broader expanse of oak-pine woodland, and higher populations of certain plant and animal species. The removal of Native Americans from southwestern Oregon in 1856 dramatically changed the environmental, as well I as cultural, diversity of the region. Hunting, fishing, and gathering were of relatively equal importance to the Native people. The elaborate fishing technology of the lower Klamath River, I with massive group efforts for weir construction, was paralleled on the Applegate and Illinois Rivers by an elaborate hunting technology and the | construction of sometimes miles-long fences that required a major group effort. It is probable that elaboration of ritual occurred with deer-fence construction, just as it did with weir construction on the Klamath River. I Snares were set in small openings in the fences. Snares were made of beargrass, which was a very important resource because of its role in the hunting technology. Beargrass was readily available in Applegate territory but not in abundance in Takelma territory in the neighboring Rogue Valley. Because of this, beargrass became an important trade item. Chapter 1: Executive Summary Page 1 Root gathering was of major importance to this area. A great abundance and diversity of root species were available, and comprised a major part of the diet during significant portions of the year. Although acorn production fluctuated greatly in the Applegate-Illinois area, root crops were relatively dependable. This situation was reversed in the Klamath region to the south, so the Applegate and I Illinois peoples were able to trade roots for acorns. Scheduling was a significant problem for the people of the Applegate and Illinois Rivers. Resources were abundant during certain times of the year, and almost non-existent at others (i.e., early spring). In addition, major fluctuations occurred in salmon runs and acorn crops. This created a cycle of periodic 3 abundance and scarcity of food, and a certain amount of stress. Planning, therefore, became an essential element of survival. Because of resource and scheduling problems, an elaborate regional l redistribution system (one based on trade, intermarriage, and social stratification) was developed to help compensate for periodic food shortages. This system was 3 destroyed during the historic era by the impact of epidemic disease, which cut across social lines and shattered trading networks and reciprocal relationships. Several subtle but significant differences, related to environmental factors, I appear between the Applegate and Illinois peoples. Illinois territory contained a greater diversity of resources, which may have allowed the Gu-sla-dada to live in semi-permanent villages for more of the year and to have larger village populations than the Applegate people. Tanoak, myrtle, and Sadler oak acorns are found in the Illinois drainage, but not in the Applegate. The Illinois has runs I of lamprey eels while the Applegate did not; and the Illinois possessed a run of exceptionally large salmon, as opposed to the Applegate, which was noteworthy only for its large steelhead population. In addition, several large falls along the Illinois provided for better fishing during the high winter runoff, whereas the Applegate River possessed no major obstructions to fish runs along its lower length. Biodiversity was extremely important as a survival factor for the Applegate a and Illinois peoples, and they managed the landscape in certain areas to promote it. This biodiversity, as exemplified by a variety of ecotones and vegetation communities, was maintained at lower elevations near semi-permanent | villages, and at higher elevations near seasonal camps. It included a mix of forest types, stands of chaparral, and prairies or meadows. One of the most important features of this environment was cover, including stands of chaparral. Villages were often built in heavy cover. Brush fences were constructed around houses as a windbreak in cases where vegetation was absent. Deer hunting usually took place in areas of considerable chaparral growth, both Chapter 1: Executive Sunmmary Page 2 l as cover for stalking hunters, and to make it easier for brush fences to force deer I into trails where snares were set. The berry of one of the dominant chaparral species of this area, manzanita, was also an important food resource. Fires were set during the spring, summer, and fall to promote a variety of | resources, both plant and animal. The Applegate and Illinois people were well aware of the varied impacts of burning by season. They developed the art of limited burning to achieve specific objectives to a well-defined science. I Fires were usually set by "specialists" who owned formulas that were prescriptions for successful burning. Temperature, wind direction, and impacts 3 to specific plants were all carefully considered before fires were set. Fire was viewed as a valuable tool, but it had the potential to damage precious resources that were essential for survival. I Some fires may have been set for ceremonial as well as utilitarian purposes. On the lower Klamath River, for example, certain mountain slopes were set ablaze each year as part of rituals to ensure a bountiful harvest and to protect against the death of married people. This practice may have been employed by the Applegate and Illinois peoples as well. I Research also indicates that root gathering areas were carefully managed to ensure sustainability and were "cultivated" to some extent. Methods employed included burning to remove competing vegetation, tilling, weeding, thinning, X replanting, and maintaining reserve areas. Grasses, tarweed, oaks, and deer browse may also have been spread by deliberate planting of seeds. j Conservation measures were employed in the management of fish and wildlife populations. Deer and elk were hunted before or after the mating season and springtime birthing. Fish harvests were carefully regulated through an I elaborate system of rituals, and a conscious effort was made to ensure that enough fish escaped to maintain the runs. The oak-pine woodland was much more prevalent than today, especially at lower elevations.
Recommended publications
  • In Partial Fulfillment Of
    WATER UTILI AT'ION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE 11ILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN by CAST" IR OLISZE "SKI A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1954 School Graduate Committee Data thesis is presented_____________ Typed by Kate D. Humeston TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION Statement and History of the Problem........ 1 Historical Data............................. 3 Procedure Used to Explore the Data.......... 4 Organization of the Data.................... 8 II. THE WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED Orientation................................. 10 Orography................................... 10 Geology................................. 11 Soil Types................................. 19 Climate ..................................... 20 Precipitation..*.,,,,,,,................... 21 Storms............'......................... 26 Physical Characteristics of the River....... 31 Physical Characteristics of the Major Tributaries............................ 32 Surface Water Supply ........................ 33 Run-off Characteristics..................... 38 Discharge Records........ 38 Ground Water Supply......................... 39 CHAPTER PAGE III. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL UTILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT.. .... .................... 44 Flood Characteristics ........................ 44 Flood History......... ....................... 45 Provisional Standard Project: Flood......... 45 Flood Plain......... ........................ 47 Flood Control................................ 48 Drainage............
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Fixed-Station Water-Quality Data in the Umpqua River Basin, Oregon
    ANALYSIS OF FIXED-STATION WATER-QUALITY DATA IN THE UMPQUA RIVER BASIN, OREGON By Joseph F. Rinella Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4253 Portland, Oregon 1986 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Services Section Water Resources Division Western Distribution Branch 847 N.E. 19th Ave., Suite 300 Box 25425, Federal Center Portland, Oregon 97232 Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 776-7476) 11 CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction----------------------------------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope------------------------------------------- 2 Description of study area----------------------------------- 2 Hydrogeology----------------------------------------------------- 5 Hydrology-------------------------------------------------------- 8 Population------------------------------------------------------- 10 Land use--------------------------------------------------------- 11 Point-source effluent-------------------------------------------- 11 Surface-water quality-------------------------------------------- 12 Description of available data base-------------------------- 12 Correlations between water-quality constituents and instantaneous river discharge----------------------------- 14 Comparision of constituent concentrations, loadings, and yields ------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study
    US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study DRAFT Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment November 2017 Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study Executive Summary The Willamette River basin is located entirely within the state of Oregon, beginning south of Cottage Grove, and extending approximately 187 miles to the north where the Willamette River flows into the Columbia River. The basin is more than 11,200 square miles, averages 75 miles in width, and encompasses approximately 12 percent of the total area of the state (Figure ES-1). Within the watershed are most of the state’s population (nearly 70 percent), larger cities, and major industries. The basin also contains some of Oregon’s most productive agricultural lands and supports nationally and regionally important fish and wildlife species. Thirteen of Oregon’s thirty-six counties intersect or lie within the boundary of the Willamette River basin. Through a series of Flood Control Acts the U.S. Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to construct, operate, and maintain thirteen major dams1 in the Willamette River basin. Collectively, these dams, reservoirs and associated infrastructure are known as the Willamette Valley Project (WVP). With a combined conservation storage capacity of approximately 1,590,000 acre-feet, the WVP is capable of providing important benefits for flood damage reduction, navigation, hydropower, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, flow augmentation for pollution abatement and improved conditions for fish and wildlife, and recreation. Feasibility Study History The Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study began in 1996 to investigate future Willamette River basin water demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii I 11 1111111111111111111
    A 13.2: K ~ -- Nry K 67x Cultural Resource Overview Klamath National Forest, California James A. McDonald USDA-Forest Service Klamath National Forest 6-02Ma . ., Doca-I..S. A 13.2:K 67x McDonald, James A. Cultural resource overview Klamath Natl I ~111111111IIIII J3 5138 11 000657291111111111111111111 3 Management Summary This report synthesizes information on the Klamath National Forest area environment and culture history, discusses the significance of the Forest's cultural resources, and makes recommendations for managing those resources. This report is one of a series of reports which will also provide descriptive summaries of Forest cultural resources, predict their distribution, and evaluate the effects of Forest activities on the resources. The Klamath National Forest environment is varied and complex. It includes the Klamath Mountains and Cascades/Modoc Plateau geomorphic provinces. The ruggedness of the Klamath Mountains province and water supply problems in the Cascades/Modoc Plateau province create challenges for those who occupy and use them. Variations in elevation, soil, moisture, aspect and vegetation create numerous local environments within each province. Little is known about the early prehistory of the Forest, although it is likely that the area was occupied by at least 4000 B.C. By the time European-Americans arrived in the area, it was occupied by people belonging to three cultures: the Karok, Shasta, and Modoc. Differences between these cultures may have originated partly from adaptation to differing local environments. The first European-Americans to enter the Forest area were members of Hudson's Bay Company trapping and exploring expeditions. They appeared in the late 1820's.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy Harvest, Climate Change, and Forest Carbon in the Oregon Coast Range
    Portland State University PDXScholar Environmental Science and Management Faculty Publications and Presentations Environmental Science and Management 3-2016 Bioenergy Harvest, Climate Change, and Forest Carbon in the Oregon Coast Range Megan K. Creutzburg Portland State University, [email protected] Robert M. Scheller Portland State University, [email protected] Melissa S. Lucash Portland State University, [email protected] Louisa B. Evers Bureau of Land Management Stephen D. LeDuc United States Environmental Protection Agency See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/esm_fac Part of the Forest Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Creutzburg, M. K., Scheller, R. M., Lucash, M. S., Evers, L. B., LeDuc, S. D., & Johnson, M. G. (2015). Bioenergy harvest, climate change, and forest carbon in the Oregon Coast Range. GCB Bioenergy. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Science and Management Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Megan K. Creutzburg, Robert M. Scheller, Melissa S. Lucash, Louisa B. Evers, Stephen D. LeDuc, and Mark G. Johnson This article is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/esm_fac/118 GCB Bioenergy (2016) 8, 357–370, doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12255 Bioenergy harvest, climate change, and forest carbon in the Oregon Coast Range MEGAN K. CREUTZBURG1 , ROBERT M. SCHELLER1 , MELISSA S. LUCASH1 , LOUISA B. EVERS2 , STEPHEN D. LEDUC3 and MARK G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregon Coast Range- Considerations for Ecological Restoration Joe Means Tom Spies Shu-Huei Chen Jane Kertis Pete Teensma
    Forests of the Oregon Coast Range- Considerations for Ecological Restoration Joe Means Tom Spies Shu-huei Chen Jane Kertis Pete Teensma The Oregon Coast Range supports some of the most dense Ocean, so they are warm and often highly productive, com- and productive forests in North America. In the pre-harvest- pared to the Cascade Range and central Oregon forests. ing period these forests arose as a result of large fires-the Isaac's (1949) site index map shows much more site class I largest covering 330,000 ha (Teensma and others 1991). and I1 land in the Coast Range than in the Cascades. In the These fires occurred mostly at intervals of 150 to 300 years. summers, humid maritime air creates a moisture gradient The natural disturbance regime supported a diverse fauna from the coastal western hemlock-Sitka spruce (Tsuga and large populations of anadromous salmonids (salmon heterophylla-Piceasitchensis) zone with periodic fog extend- and related fish). In contrast, the present disturbance re- ing 4 to 10 km inland, through Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga gime is dominated by patch clearcuts of about 10-30 ha menziesii var. rnenziesii)-western hemlock forests in the superimposed on most of the forest land with agriculture on central zone to the drier interior-valley foothill zone of the flats near rivers. Ages of most managed forests are less Douglas-fir, bigleaf maple (Acer rnacrophyllum)and Oregon than 60 years. This logging has coincided with significant oak (Quercus garryana). declines in suitable habitat and populations of some fish and wildlife species. Some of these species have been nearly extirpated.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Crags State Park Brochure
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Castle Crags to provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping he lofty spires and to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological T State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and granite dome of Castle Crags cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. rise to more than 6,500 feet. The grandeur of the crags has been revered as California State Parks supports equal access. an extraordinary place Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park for millennia. at (530) 235-2684. This publication can be made available in alternate formats. Contact [email protected] or call (916) 654-2249. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ Castle Crags State Park 20022 Castle Creek Road Castella, CA 96017 (530) 235-2684 © 2014 California State Parks M ajestic Castle Crags have inspired The Okwanuchu Shasta territory covered A malaria epidemic brought by European fur enduring myths and legends since about 700 square miles of forested mountains trappers wiped out much of the Okwanuchu prehistoric times. More than 170 million from the headwaters of the Sacramento River Shasta populace by 1833. years old, these granite formations in to the McCloud River and from Mount Shasta With the 1848 gold discoveries at the the Castle Crags Wilderness border the to Pollard Flat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perilous Last Leg of the Oregon Trail Down the Columbia River
    Emigrant Lake County Park California National Historic Trail Hugo Neighborhood Association and Historical Society Jackson County Parks National Park Service The 1846 Applegate Trail—Southern Route to Oregon The perilous last leg of the Oregon Trail down the “Father and Uncle Jesse, seeing their children drowning, were seized with ‘ Columbia River rapids took lives, including the sons frenzy, and dropping their oars, sprang from their seats and were about to make a desperate attempt to swim to them. But Mother and Aunt Cynthia of Jesse and Lindsay Applegate in 1843. The Applegate cried out, ‘Men, don't quit your oars! If you do, we'll all be lost!’” brothers along with others vowed to look for an all- -Lindsay Applegate’s son Jesse land route into Oregon from Idaho for future settlers. “Our hearts are broken. As soon as our families are settled and time can be spared we must look for another way that avoids the river.” -Lindsay Applegate In 1846 Jesse and Lindsay Applegate and 13 others from near Dallas, Oregon, headed south following old trapper trails into a remote region of Oregon Country. An Umpqua Indian showed them a foot trail that crossed the Calapooya Mountains, then on to Umpqua Valley, Canyon Creek, and the Rogue Valley. They next turned east and went over the Cascade Mountains to the Klamath Basin. The party devised pathways through canyons and mountain passes, connecting the trail south from the Willamette Valley with the existing California Trail to Fort Hall, Idaho. In August 1846, the first emigrants to trek the new southern road left Fort Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Creek Watershed Assessment
    Yamhill Basin Council Mill Watershed Assessment December 30, 1999 Funding for the Mill Assessment was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and Resource Assistance for Rural Environments. Mill Assessment Project Manager: Robert J. Bower, Principal Author Co-authors: Chris Lupoli, Linfield College intern, for Riparian section and assisted with Wetlands Conditions section. Tamara Quandt, Linfield College intern, for Sensitive Species section. Editors: Melissa Leoni, Yamhill Basin Council, McMinnville, OR Alison Bower, Forest Ecologist, Corvallis, OR Contributors: Bill Ferber, Salem, Water Resources Department (WRD) Chester Novak, Salem, Bureau Land Management (BLM) Dan Upton, Dallas, Willamette Industries David Anderson, Monmouth, Boise Cascade Dean Anderson, Dallas, Polk County Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Dennis Ades, Salem, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Gary Galovich, Corvallis, Oregon Department Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Mark Koski, Salem, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Patrick Hawe, Salem, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Rob Tracey, McMinnville, Natural Resource and Conservation Service (NRCS) Stan Christensen, McMinnville, Yamhill Soil Water Conservation District Susan Maleki, Corvallis, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Warren Tausch, Tillamook Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Special Thanks: ! John Cruickshank, Gooseneck Creek resident for his assistance with the Historical, and Channel Modification sections and in the gathering of historical photographs. ! Gooseneck Creek Watershed Group for their support and guidance. ! John Caputo, Yamhill County GIS. ! BLM and Polk County GIS for providing some of the GIS base layers used to create the maps in this assessment. ! USDA Service Center, Natural Resource Conservation Service, McMinnville, for copying and office support. ! Polk and Yamhill Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ! Nick Varnum, PNG Environmental Inc., Tigard, for assisting with the Hydrology and Channel Habitat Typing sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I: Trail Maps, Research Methods & Historical Accounts
    Coquille Indian Tribe Cultural Geography Project Coquelle Trails: Early Historical Roads and Trails of Ancestral Coquille Indian Lands, 1826 - 1875 Volume I: Trail Maps, Research Methods & Historical Accounts Report Prepared by: Bob Zybach, Program Manager Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc. & Don Ivy, Manager Coquille Indian Tribe Historic Preservation Office – Cultural Resources Program North Bend, Oregon January 4, 2013 Preface Coquelle Trails: Early Historical Roads and Trails of Ancestral Coquille Indian Lands, 1826 - 1875 renews a project originally started in 2006 to investigate and publish a “cultural geography” of the modern Coquille Indian Tribe: a description of the physical landscape and geographic area occupied or utilized by the Ancestors of the modern Coquille Tribe prior to -- and at the time of -- the earliest reported contacts with Europeans and Euro- Americans. Coquelle Trails is the first of what is expected to be several installments that will complete this renewed Cultural Geography Project. Although ships and sailors made contact with Indians in earlier years, the focus of this report begins with the first historical land-based contacts between Indians and foreigners along the rivers and beaches of Oregon’s south coast. Those few and brief encounters are documented in poorly written and often incomplete journals of men who, without maps or a true fix on their locations, wandered into and across the lands of Hanis, Miluk, and Athapaskan speaking Indians in what is today Coos and Curry Counties. Those wanderings were the first surges of the tidal wave of America’s Manifest Destiny that would soon wash over the Indians and their country.
    [Show full text]
  • "Preserve Analysis : Saddle Mountain"
    PRESERVE ANALYSIS: SADDLE MOUNTAIN Pre pare d by PAUL B. ALABACK ROB ERT E. FRENKE L OREGON NATURAL AREA PRESERVES ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the STATE LAND BOARD Salem. Oregon October, 1978 NATURAL AREA PRESERVES ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the STATE LAND BOARD Robert Straub Nonna Paul us Governor Clay Myers Secretary of State State Treasurer Members Robert Frenkel (Chairman), Corvallis Bill Burley (Vice Chainnan), Siletz Charles Collins, Roseburg Bruce Nolf, Bend Patricia Harris, Eugene Jean L. Siddall, Lake Oswego Ex-Officio Members Bob Maben Wi 11 i am S. Phe 1ps Department of Fish and Wildlife State Forestry Department Peter Bond J. Morris Johnson State Parks and Recreation Branch State System of Higher Education PRESERVE ANALYSIS: SADDLE MOUNTAIN prepared by Paul B. Alaback and Robert E. Frenkel Oregon Natural Area Preserves Advisory Committee to the State Land Board Salem, Oregon October, 1978 ----------- ------- iii PREFACE The purpose of this preserve analysis is to assemble and document the significant natural values of Saddle Mountain State Park to aid in deciding whether to recommend the dedication of a portion of Saddle r10untain State Park as a natural area preserve within the Oregon System of I~atural Areas. Preserve management, agency agreements, and manage­ ment planning are therefore not a function of this document. Because of the outstanding assemblage of wildflowers, many of which are rare, Saddle r·1ountain has long been a mecca for· botanists. It was from Oregon's botanists that the Committee initially received its first documentation of the natural area values of Saddle Mountain. Several Committee members and others contributed to the report through survey and documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • All Our Relations
    Praise for All Our Relations “A brilliant, gripping narrative ... I urge that everyone read [All Our Relations] ... which describes the ravages of corporations and government activity on the reservations of our first natives. This is a beautifully written book.... As Winona LaDuke describes, in moving and often beautiful prose, [these] misdeeds are not distant history but are ongoing degradation of the cherished lands of Native Americans.” —Ralph Nader “As Winona LaDuke’s All Our Relations shows, a vital Native American environmentalism is linking indigenous peoples throughout North America and Hawaii in the fight to protect and restore their health, culture, and the ecosystems on their lands. LaDuke herself is a member of the Anishinaabeg nation and was Ralph Nader’s Green Party running mate in 1996. These Native American activists take inspiration from their forebears’ responsible treatment of natural systems, based on a reverence for the interconnectedness of all life forms.” —The Nation “In this thoroughly researched and convincingly written analysis of Native American culture ... LaDuke demonstrates the manners in which native peoples face a constant barrage of attacks that threaten their very existence.” —Choice “[LaDuke presents] strong voices of old, old cultures bravely trying to make sense of an Earth in chaos.” —Whole Earth “With a good ear and sharp eye, LaDuke introduces us to Native activists and records gross environmental abuse and creative resistence. By placing people in the center of the industrial soup, LaDuke tells a story that has not been told before in this way.” —Radcliffe Quarterly “A rare perspective on Native history and culture.” —Sister to Sister “LaDuke unabashedly confronts spiritual and political grassroots missions with a tenacity that, as she explains, springs up from devotion to the land.” —City Pages “A thoughtful, candid, in-depth account of Native resistance to environmental and cultural degradation ..
    [Show full text]