A CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERVIEW Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERVIEW Of PREHISTORY and HISTORY of the ROGUE RIVER NATIONALFOREST: A CULTURALRESOURCE OVERVIEW Forest Service USDA Pacific Northwest Region Rogue River National Forest PREHISTORY and HISTORY of the ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST A CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERVIEW by: Jeffrey M. LaLande Cultural Resource Specialist Rogue River National Forest Medford, Oregon June 1980 CR Job RR-280 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This volume is an attempt to compile a narrative review of what is known about the human past of a portion of southwestern Oregon and northwestern California -- an area now eiithraced within the boundaries of the Rogue River National Forest -- and to provide some direction relative to the continuing management of the physical evidence of that past -- the Forest's cultural resources. The Overview resulted from several years of archival research and field work. Much of it was accomplished as part ofa wide variety of site- specific cultural resource inventory projects undertaken by the U. S. Forest Service. This document is intended to be of both wide-enough scope and adequate detail so thatit will havea long life asa useful cultural resource management tool. A number of persons have helped to bring the Overview to completion. Among them are Donald H. Smith, Forest Supervisor, who has encouraged the Rogue's endeavors in cultural resource management; Bob R. Lichlyter (Recreation Staff Officer) and Lawrence D. Wheeler (Land Management Planning StaffOfficer), both of whomallocated to theprojectthe necessary financial as well as moral support. Dorothy Newell(Resources Section) typed the rough draft and the final, photo-ready copy for publication.Gary Handschug (Forest Illustrator) assisted with the graphics; he and Marilynn Pantel (Forester) helped to prepare the document for printing. Drafts of the manuscript were reviewed by Dr. David Brauner (Department of Anthropology -- OregonStateUniversity), TedCobo (Cultural Resource Coordinator -- Rogue River National Forest), and Dr. Leslie E.Wildesen (1egiona1 Archaeologist -- USFS Pacific Northwest Region), each of whom made a number of helpful suggestions. The author would like to express his appreciation to these people, as well as a number of others -- both within andoutside the Forest Servvice -- who offered their interest and encouragement during the project. 1 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose 1 Scope and Format 3 NORTH SISKIYOU CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 9 Physical Setting 9 Prehistoric Period 11 Historic Period 21 III.ASHLAND CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 51 Physical Setting 51 Prehistoric Period 52 Historic Period 64 McLOUGHLIN CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 109 Physical Setting 109 Prehistoric Period 110 Historic Period 125 UPPER ROGUE CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 161 Physical Setting 161 Prehistoric Period 162 Historic Period 172 SUMMARY AND SYNTHESIS 203 Summary Statement 203 Cultural Patterns of Forest Use 205 Cultural Resources: Summary of Current Site Inventory 206 VII.THE CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ON THE ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND FUTURE NEEDS 213 Progress Report: The Current Situation 213 Future Management Needs 218 Conclusion 220 REFERENCES 225 Comment on Sources 225 References Cited 226 Personal Sources 249 v APPENDIX I: LIST OF POTENTIAL NATIONAL REGISTER SITES FOR THE ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST 25 3 APPENDIX II: )GUE RIVER TIME-LINR -- A C2RONOLOGY OF THE NTTIONAL FOREST AND ENVIRONS 261: APPENDIX III: FROM ABBOTT BIYPTE TO ZIMMERMAN BURN - A GPX)GRAPHIC NAME GLOSSARY OF THE ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST -. 71 MAPS LOCATION ps 2 MAJOR ECOLOGICAL ZONES 4 NORTH SISKIYOU CiJL'X'URALRESOURCE UNIT. ASHLAND CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT ... .. .. 53 McLOUGHLIN CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT Li UPPgR ROGUE CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 163 TABLES CULTURAl4 RESOURCE SITES by ThEMATIC CATEGORY AND CULTURAL RESOURCE UNIT 20 OUTLINE OF CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FUNCTIONS 216 SUMMARY OF SPPS FOR CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT EFFECTS UPON NkTIONAL REGISTER PROPERTIES 217 vi PHOTOGRAPHS MILL WORKERS POSED AT THE NEIL CREEK SAWMILL CIRCA 1900. (SOUTHERN OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY) COVER GROUP I 6 I-i Southern Pacific R.R. survey r'rew, Ca. 1885. 1-2 Mt. McLoughlin from Ranche-ia Prairie, Ca. 1880. GROUP II 43 11-1. View of Siskiyou Crest from Craggy Mtn. 11-2. Indian dancers, Kiamath River area. 11-3 & 4. Chinese men in Jacksonville, Ca. 1875. 11-5. Miners at Blue Ledge Mine, Ca. 1910. 11-6. Eileen Hotel, Ca. 1908. 11-7. Hutton, Ca. 1908. 11-8. Oregon Caves, Ca. 1915. 11-9. Cattle range, sign-posting by USFS. 11-10. Windy Peak Lookout. 11-11. Prospector in the Upper Applegate drainage, 1930s. 11-12. Denxnan Cabin. 11-13. Whisky Peak Lookout. 11-14. Carberry Creek bridge, 1940s. 99 Aerial view of Applegate Valley. Chief John, Ca. 1860. Squaw Creek hydraulic mining operation, Ca. 1880. Steamboat stamp mill, "bull wheel." Mining trommel, Elliott Creek, Ca. 1965. Blair Granite Quarry, Ca. 1920. "Swinging bridge," Ca. 1910. Cattle round-up, ca. 1930. Oxen hauling logs to Yale Creek, Ca. 1912. Neil Creek sawmill, Ca. 1916. Garretsonts Cinnabar Springs, Ca. 1910. Family group of "Excursionists," Ca. 1915. Swnxnit of Mt. Ashland, Ca. 1925. Ashland Creek powerhouse. Star Banger Station, Ca. 1916. McKee Campground "community kitchen" shelter, 1936. Dutchman Peak Lookout, 1943. Mt. Ashland Ski Lodge, 1963. Applegate River during 1964 flood. GROUP IV 151 IV- 1 Mt. McLoughlin from Big Elk Meadow. IV-2 "Squaw Mary" and daughters, Ca. 1865. IV-3 Deer hunters camped in High Cascades, Ca. 1890. IV-4 Sullivan homestead cabin, 1910. 'v-S Homestead family on the Dead Indian Plateau, 1910. IV-6 Fish Lake impoundment, 1927. IV-7 Butte Falls, ca. 1908. vii GROUP IV (continued) Butte Falls Lumber Company's woods crew at donkey engine, Ca. 1910. "High wheels" on Brownlee-Olds logging show, Ca. 1922. Owen-Oregon caterpillar logging on Fourbit Creek Sale, Ca. 1926. Owen-Oregon'sMcGiffert" loading logs onto railroad Car, Ca. 1926. Big Elk Guard Station, 1927. U.S. Army troops on Cat Hill Burn, 1910. South Lake SCS snow survey cabin, Ca. 1930. - Camp South Fcrk of the CCC, ca. 1936. EmegenCy Relief Administration roCk work at Dead Indian Soda Springs, 1936. Xmas tree Cutting at Twin Ponds, 1937. Caterpillar logging with steel "logging arch's, 1953. Devils Peak Lookout, Ca. 1968. GROUP V 192 V-i. Rogue River Canyon. Indian woman with burden basket, ca. 1860. "Union Creek Trail" (old Crater Lake Road), ca. 1910. Berry pickers at Huckleberry Mtn., Ca. 1890. Boothby family at Prospect store, ca. 1895. Prospect area barn-raising, Ca. 1900. Auto on old Diamond Lake Road, Ca. 1926. Brown's Cabin Ranger Station, 1911. COPCO powerhouse on Upper Rogue, Ca. 1914. V-b. Cattle drive to Rogue-Umpqua divide, Ca. 1930s. V-li. Fly fishing on the Upper Rogue, 1925. Tourist autos at Prospect, ca. 1930. Union creek Resort gas station, Ca. 1930. canning berries at Huckleberry Mtn., Ca. 1935. V-iS. Farewell Bend Campground, Ca. 1938. Ribes Eradication project work, 1936. Truck hauling sugar pine logs to Medford, Ca. 1940. Svindth railroad tie mill, 1944. Windfall tree from Columbus Day storm, 1962. GROUP VI 221 VI-i. Bert McKee at Beaver Creek homestead, 1910. viii I. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE A Cultural Resource Overview is defined as a "broad-based inventory of a large geographic area, based on previously known or recorded information" (Wildesen 1977:2). This particular document provides a narrative review of the prehistory and historyof lands contained withinthe Rogue River National Forest. It is drawn from the available ethnographic, archaeological and historical source literature, as well as from interviews with local residents who were familiar with specific aspects of the area's history. This Overview is intended to serve asa master sourcebook for future reference -- to provide an organized, documented context in which to place the variousculturalresourceslocated onor adjacenttoForest Service-administered land. The U. S. Forest Service,as a Federal land-managing agency, has the responsibility to inventory,evaluate and manage the significant cultural resources under its jurisdiction "in a spirit of stewardship and trusteeship"forfuturegenerations (ExecutiveOrder11593). The term "cultural resources",as used here, refers to physically discrete sites, structures and objects made or used by human beings in the past -- in effect,the "on-the-ground" remnants and reminders of historical(in the broad sense) patterns and events. They actually are more than mere "places and things" however -- some cultural resources are repositories of important scientific information; many are sources of public education and enjoyment; and all ofthem providetangible links to the lifeways of previous generations. In brief,the Cultural Resource Overview is intended to serve asa large-scale research document prepared for the Rogue River National Forest's Lend Management Plan; as an aid in the on-going inventory and evaluation of the Forest's cultural resources; and as a basis for planning future cultural resource management needs. The Cultural Resource Overview was written with several potential audi- ences in mind. It is expected to be useful to persons with diverse expec- tations and needs. Among those at which the document is aimed are the responsible Forest Service officials (i.e., the Forest Supervisor and the District Rangers) and their staffs. The Overview provides specific cultural resource information relative to their geographic areas of concern; in most cases, a review of Chapters VI and VII will meet their needs. The Overview also gives broad background data on past resource development and land-use patterns for use by theRogue River NationalForest's Land Management Planning team in complying with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act,theNationalForest Management Act and other le9islation. 1 Location Maps r..Ob& Ce.k Lake Cl' G*ANT8 P$ CINTRA*. POINT (ó) PDFORD Q 'I, AI441.AND AbhIhd R.S. App.9te RS I,. Cofornc' (1 Legend Red Butt Condtey Rbu.. R,ve' Nto Prehistory & History of the ogue Rve N.ionI Rogue River National Forest 0 5 10 I I iN MUS The Overview is intended as a site- and area-specific research tool for the Forest's cultural resource specialists and technicians.
Recommended publications
  • Crater Lake Reflections Summer-Fall 2018
    Crater Lake National Park National Park Service Crater Lake U.S. Department of the Interior Refections Visitor Guide Summer/Fall 2018 Park News 2 ... Camping, Lodging, Food Discovering Crater Lake 3 ... Ranger Programs f Water Restrictions in Effect Please help us conserve water during 12 Great Ways to Enjoy Your Stay 4 ... Hiking Trails your visit. In March, the state of 5 ... Driving Map Oregon declared a drought emergency The frst European-American to see Crater Lake was lucky to ... In the News: Bull Trout for our county. In 8 of the past 10 survive the experience. On June 12, 1853, gold prospector John 6 years, the park has received less snow Wesley Hillman was riding his mule up a long, sloping mountain. 7 ... Feature Article: Lake Level than normal. Last winter’s snow total He was lost, tired, and not paying attention to the terrain ahead. was 15 feet below average. While 8 ... Climate Chart Suddenly, his mule stopped. Hillman sat up and found himself you’re here, please take short showers, on the edge of a clif, gazing in astonishment at “the bluest and don’t run the tap, and reuse towels most beautiful body of water I had ever seen.” He added: “If and sheets if staying overnight in park Look Inside! I had been riding a blind mule, I frmly believe I would have lodging. Thanks for your help! ridden over the edge to death and destruction.” f Leave Your Drone at Home While mules—no matter how sharp their eyesight—are no longer Operating remote-controlled aircraft permitted to approach the rim of Crater Lake, there are many in the park is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • National History Bee: Round 3 Tournament Room Division Round Moderator Scorer 3 (Circle 1) V JV
    Final Final JV score 35 V 34 33 8 points 32 Division (circle 1) 31 30 . 3 29 28 9 points 27 incorrect interrupt), place running running place incorrect interrupt), rd Round 26 25 24 23 10 points 10 22 21 20 19 Room 18 11 points 11 17 16 15 14 12 pts 13 Scorer 12 13 Make column scoresplace sure the to in forcorrect the question 11 10 14 9 8 7 . 6 ifscore no change. 5 National History Bee: Round 3 History Round Bee: National 4 15 points 15 3 2 1 ) Cross out entire columnCross entire out include school . Remove student from round. In “Final score” column, place student’s total score (refer to the bottom row for the question on which +8 was Remove from was student +8 score” score “Final (referwhich column, In total on round. bottom student’s forplace to the question the row For correct answers, place new running total in student’s row for the corresponding question. For -1’s (3 for question. corresponding the row student’s in total running For correct new place answers, and Cross remainder out of row student’s circle it Moderator full name Total pts for +8 reaching Student namesStudent ( Tournament INSTRUCTIONS: SCORING: and total +8: REACHING reached). NHBB Nationals Bee 2017-2018 Bee Round 3 Bee Round 3 Regulation Questions (1) This empire's naval commanders included the native Dutchman Jan Janszoon. In the 18th century, this empire's capital was briefly taken over by the sailor Patrona Halil. This empire's other naval commanders included Dragut, who served as a galley slave after this empire lost a pivotal battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Applegate Hydrology Report
    Little Applegate Watershed Hydrology Report Michael Zan * Hydrologist April 1995 Little Applegate Watershed Analysis Hydrology Report SECTION 1 LITTLE APPLEGATE RIVER HYDROLOGY Mean Monthly Flows: Except for some data collected from May through October 1913, and from June through October 1994. there is no known flow data for the Little Applegate River or its tributaries. With this in mind it was necessary to construct a hydrograph displaying mean monthly flows by utilizing records from nearby stations that have been published in USGS Surface Water Records and Open-File Reports. In constructing a hydrograph, a short discussion of low flows is first in order. Since low streamflows have been identified as a key question pertaining to the larger issues of water quantity/quality and fish populations, the greatest need is to gain a reasonable estimate of seasonal low flows to help quantify the impacts of water withdrawals on instream beneficial uses. With this in mind, extreme caution must be used when extrapolating data from gaged to ungaged watersheds. This is particularly important in determining low-flow characteristics (Riggs 1972, Gallino 1994 personal communications). The principle terrestrial influence on low flow is geology and the primary meteorological influence is precipitation. Neither have been adequately used to describe effects on low flow using an index so that estimation of low flow characteristics of sites without discharge measurements has met with limited success. Exceptions are on streams in a region with homogeneous geology, topography, and climate, in which it should be possible to define a range of flow per square mile for a given recurrence interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2011 The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861 Cessna R. Smith Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smith, Cessna R., "The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861" (2011). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 258. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.258 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861 by Cessna R. Smith A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: William L. Lang, Chair David A. Horowitz David A. Johnson Barbara A. Brower Portland State University ©2011 ABSTRACT This thesis examines how the pursuit of commercial gain affected the development of agriculture in western Oregon’s Willamette, Umpqua, and Rogue River Valleys. The period of study begins when the British owned Hudson’s Bay Company began to farm land in and around Fort Vancouver in 1825, and ends in 1861—during the time when agrarian settlement was beginning to expand east of the Cascade Mountains. Given that agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon
    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Places to Go Fishing Within 60 Minutes of Medford
    41. ROGUE RIVER ABOVE LOST CREEK 48. VALLEY OF THE ROGUE STATE PARK, Common Fish RESERVOIR, Prospect – 42 mi, 55 min. Gold Hill – 16 mi., 20 min. Trout Salmon, steelhead, trout 50 places Premier summer trout fishery stocked with rainbow trout weekly Campground with river access, boat ramp and ADA restroom. between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Campgrounds and Take I-5 N for 15.5 miles to Exit 45B. Right onto Twin Bridges to go fishing within other public access sites are stocked. More fishing on naturally Rd. Go under the freeway into the park. ORSP produced trout is available in tributaries, and on the South and 49. WHITEHORSE PARK, Grants Pass – Salmon Middle Forks. Take OR-62 E about 42 miles and look for access Trout Steelhead 60 minutes points and campgrounds. USFS 38 mi., 45 min. Salmon, steelhead, trout 42. SARDINE CREEK/ROCK POINT, Gold Hill – of Medford County campground and day use fee park with restrooms, picnic 13 mi., 18 min. Let’s go fishing on Saturday. Not enough time to go fishing? Think again – if you live in the Salmon, steelhead, trout area, and boat ramp. Take I-5 N 28 miles to Exit 58. Left onto 6th Str. and go about 2 miles. Right onto G Str. and go 1.3 miles Medford area, there are many places you can get to in less than an hour. Mileage and generalized Undeveloped access site on the Rogue River at the junction of where it becomes Upper River Rd. Go another 4.5 miles to where directions are from Rogue Valley Mall, 1968 Crater Lake Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment
    Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment Little Butte Creek Watershed Council August 2003 Abstract The Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment has been prepared for the Little Butte Creek Watershed Council with funding from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). The Assessment was prepared using the guidelines set forth in the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board’s 1999 Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The purpose of this document is to assess the current conditions and trends of human caused and ecologic processes within the Little Butte Creek Watershed and compare them with historic conditions. Many important ecological processes within the watershed have been degraded over the last 150 years of human activity. This Assessment details those locations and processes that are in need of restoration as well as those that are operating as a healthy system. The Assessment was conducted primarily at the 5th field watershed level, that of the entire Little Butte Creek Watershed. List and describe field watershed levels below. Where possible, the analyses was refined to the smaller 6th field watershed level, thirteen of which exist within the Little Butte Creek Watershed. The assessment also notes gaps in data and lists recommendations for future research and data collection. It is intended that this document, and the Little Butte Creek Watershed Action Plan be used as guides for future research and watershed protection and enhancement over the next decade. The document was developed using existing data. No new data was collected for this project. Where data was lacking, it was detailed for future work and study. Acknowledgements This assessment was compiled and written by Steve Mason.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit K Land Use
    Exhibit K Land Use Sams Valley Reinforcement Projects December 2017 Prepared for PacifiCorp Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. This page intentionally left blank EXHIBIT K: COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Site Certificate Condition Compliance .............................................................................................................. 2 Land Use Analysis Area – OAR 3450-021-0010 (1)(k)(A) ....................................................................... 3 Local Land Use Approval – OAR 3450-021-0010 (1)(k)(B) .................................................................... 3 EFSC Determination on Land Use – OAR 3450-021-0010 (1)(k)(C) ................................................... 4 5.1 Utility Facilities Necessary for Public Service .......................................................................................... 5 5.1.1 PacifiCorp’s Planning and Public Service Obligation (Project Need) .................................... 6 5.1.2 Reasonable Alternatives .......................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Identification of Applicable Substantive Criteria – OAR 3450-021-0010 (1)(k)(C)(i) ......... 10 5.3 Applicable Substantive Criteria from OAR 3450-021-0010 (1)(k)(C)(ii) .................................. 12 5.3.1 Josephine County
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon 635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 Theodore R Kjibngdski, Governor (503) 373-0050 Fax (503) 378-5518 Www
    Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon 635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 Theodore R KjibngDski, Governor (503) 373-0050 Fax (503) 378-5518 www. lc d. s tat e. or. us NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT Mis. 7/29/2009 TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments FROM: Plan Amendment Program Specialist SUBJECT: Jackson County Plan Amendment DLCD File Number 005-09 The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of adoption. A Copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government office. Appeal Procedures* DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Monday, August 10, 2009 This amendment was not submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoptionPursuant to OAR 660-18-060, the Director or any person is eligible to appeal this action to LUBA under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley by Gregory V
    Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University The Rogue Valley region is one of many intermountain valley areas along the west coast of the United States. Nestled in the southwestern portion of Oregon, the landscape of the Rogue Valley is extremely diverse, coming from the joining of three mountain ranges of varying ages and structure: the Klamath and Siskiyou Mountains to the southwest to southeast, the Coastal Range to the west, and the Cascades to the east and north. The region is drained mainly by the Rogue River and its major tributaries; the Applegate River, the Illinois River, and Bear Creek. At the largest scale, the weather and climate of the region is mainly influenced by the North Pacific Ocean and the westerly winds of the mid-latitudes. The maritime air masses that originate over the Pacific are cooled by the ocean currents offshore and moderate the climate of the region. Seasonally the west coast undergoes shifts between cooler, moister conditions in the winter with a strengthening of the Aleutian Low that brings storms into the region; to warmer, drier conditions in the summer that are associated with the dominance of the Pacific High. On a regional scale, the general north-south or northwest-southeast oriented valleys, with their proximity to the Pacific Ocean and the number and height of mountain barriers, help to create climate conditions of wetter and cooler areas in the western parts of the region and warmer and drier eastern areas. At the local scale, site differences in elevation, topography, and orientation to the sun influence the variation in gardening potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Our Rivers Interview with the Rogue Riverkeeper 2
    Volume 4, Issue 14 // July 6 - July 19, 2017 FOOD pg 22 Mod Pizza Sizzles OUTDOORS pg 26 Keeping Jetboats Local FILM pg 27 An Eastern Oregon Documentary Protect our rivers Interview With The Rogue Riverkeeper 2 / WWW.ROGUEVALLEYMESSENGER.COM SUMMER EXHIBITIONS Tofer Chin: 8 Amir H. Fallah: Unknown Voyage Ryan Schneider: Mojave Masks Liz Shepherd: East-West: Two Streams Merging Wednesday, June 14 through Saturday, September 9, 2017 The Summer exhibitions are funded in part by a generous donation from Judy Shih and Joel Axelrod. MUSEUM EVENTS Tuesday Tours: IMAGES (LEFT TO RIGHT, TOP TO BOTTOM, DETAILS): Tofer Chin, Overlap No. 3, 2016, Acrylic on canvas, 48 x 34” Free Docent-led Tours of the Exhibitions Amir H. Fallah, Unknown Voyage, 2015, Acrylic, colored pencil and collage on paper mounted on canvas, 48 x 36” Ryan Schneider, Many Headed Owl, 2016, Oil on canvas, 60 x 48” Liz Shepherd, Mount Shasta at Dawn, 2012, Watercolor on riches paper, 19.5 x 27.5” Tuesdays at 12:30 pm MUSEUM HOURS: MONDAY – SATURDAY, 10 AM TO 4 PM • FREE AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC mailing: 1250 Siskiyou Boulevard • gps: 555 Indiana Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-552-6245 • email: [email protected] web: sma.sou.edu • social: @schneidermoa PARKING: From Indiana Street, turn left into the metered lot between Frances Lane and Indiana St. There is also limited parking behind the Museum. JULY 6 – JULY 19, 2017 / THE ROGUE VALLEY MESSENGER / 3 The Rogue Valley Messenger PO Box 8069 | Medford, OR 97501 CONTENTS 541-708-5688 page page roguevalleymessenger.com FEATURE FOOD [email protected] Rivers are the lifeblood Mod Pizza is a THE BUSINESS END OF THINGS that flows throughout Seattle-based chain.
    [Show full text]