December 21, 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

December 21, 2006 06-12/21 p 01-07 12/20/06 8:28 PM Page 1 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE PARK SLOPE FOOD COOP Established 1973 Volume AA, Number 26 December 21, 2006 Member Profile: Giving What Debbie Kaplan Comes Naturally Public By Ed Levy Health he annual orgy of giv- ongoing non-seasonal gifts of since 1973 it has donated ing is here again, for food and labor in the neigh- food that is edible but can no T better or worse. borhood. Should it—can it— longer be sold to the soup Programs According to a nonprofit do more? Just how does the kitchen Christian Help in Park organization that tracks the Coop stack up in the giving Slope. And because the vol- patterns of charitable giving department? ume of food donated to That in the United States, 89% of According to General CHIPS is far more than the : all American households give Coordinators Joe Holtz and soup kitchen can prepare Work to charity, an average of Jess Robinson, the Coop with its own staff, the Coop $1,620 per household, to the takes its lead regarding chari- provides it with labor in the By Frank Haberle tune of $260.28 billion dollars table giving from the General form of more than 60 workers BY ZOË KAPLAN-LEWIS PHOTO in 2005. That amounts to Meeting, and over the years per month to prepare meals. trike up a conversation Public Health from Hunter 2.1% of the country’s gross the GM has consistently The Coop also sends labor in the Coop checkout College, then returned to the domestic product. Of that, opposed it. Appeals to the and food waste for compost S line. You might meet a field to monitor quality businesses contribute 5.3%. GM for food or money fail for to the garden on Union community activist, or a assurance and oversee clini- Giving is also good busi- a variety of reasons, Holtz Street. City Harvest also takes proud mother, or a 30-year cal services for Planned Par- ness—as well as a tax deduc- said, but most of all because food from the Coop that can- Coop member, or a singer in enthood of New York City. In tion, a subtle form of the diverse membership can- not be sold. a choir, or a public health 2001 she joined the DOHMH, advertising and a cheaper not agree on which charities Aside from gifts of candy in official who’s changing the where she now applies her means of improving a compa- are worthy of donations, and previous years to the bank way reproductive health ser- hands-on experience to pre- tellers who handled the vices are delivered in poor serve and expand programs Coop’s accounts, Holtz communities across the city. that work. remembers only one occasion And with a little luck, you “It’s the best job I’ve ever when the General Coordina- might meet all five at once: had,” Debbie says. “I get to tors made decisions about Debbie Kaplan, Coop mem- do things on a city-wide charitable giving without the ber number 693, and Assis- scale that can help women consent of the General Meet- tant Commissioner for the and teens, mothers and ing. That occurred just after New York City Department of babies. We’ve got four main the events of 9/11, five years Health and Mental Hygiene’s goals: to reduce infant and ago, when practically all (DOHMH) Bureau of Mater- maternal mortality, to lower donations to charity were nal, Infant & Reproductive teen and unintended preg- going to victims of the attacks Health. nancy, to promote breast and other charities were suf- For almost three decades, feeding and to address dis- fering. At that time, the Gen- Debbie has worked to parities in perinatal and eral Coordinators made improve health services for reproductive health.” The modest cash donations to underserved New Yorkers. last is especially important CHIPS and City Harvest at She started as a physician in a city where babies born their own initiative, and gave assistant in an outpatient to black mothers are twice as away a few hundred dollars clinic at Jacobi Hospital, then likely to die in their first year ILLUSTRATION BY LYNN BERNSTEIN BY LYNN ILLUSTRATION worth of food to workers at worked at a methadone detox as white babies, and black ny’s branding than other because enough people usu- Ground Zero. In the aftermath residential program, then women are more than four forms of generosity. Wal- ally object to any forms of of the attacks the firemen at launched a school-based times as likely to die during Mart, to take one example, largesse that will potentially the station next door to the health center. In the mid 80’s or after childbirth. Latina the object of numerous law- raise Coop prices. Coop were also granted hon- she received her Master’s in CONTINUED ON PAGE 3 suits for its ungenerous poli- “People have come to me orary member status by the cies toward employees, and said, ‘This is a really great GM so that they could shop nevertheless leads the list of school,’ or ‘Could the Coop whenever they wished—more businesses giving grants in take out an ad in our newspa- a gesture of neighborliness Next General Meeting on January 30 the United States. Compa- per,’ but it has never worked than it was of charity. The General Meeting of the Park Slope Food Coop is held on the nies that give to “non-com- out,” Holtz told the Gazette. The Coop also sends 40 peo- last Tuesday of each month.* The next General Meeting will be mercial” public radio now get ple to the Park Slope Communi- Tuesday, January 30, 7:00 p.m. at the Congregation Beth Elohim mini-advertisements dis- Organic Giving ty Council Civic Sweep twice Temple House (Garfield Temple), 274 Garfield Pl. guised as announcements. On the other hand, the every year, which spruces up the The agenda will appear in the next Gazette and will be avail- Many small businesses, too, Coop does engage in forms of nearby community by painting able as a flyer in the entryway of the Coop beginning Wednes- engage in charitable giving symbiotic giving naturally mailboxes, sweeping and clean- day, January 3. For more information about the GM and about and benefit from it. The Coop, related to its presence in the ing up trash. As part of the com- Coop governance, please see the center of this issue. not easy to categorize by any Park Slope and New York munity contributing to the wear * Exceptions for November and December will be posted. means, largely engages in communities. For example, CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 IN THIS ISSUE Thu, Jan 4 •Food Class: Sea Vegetables, 7:30 p.m. Holiday Cookbook . 5 Coop Fri, Jan 5 •Film Night: Media That Matters—Short Films About Coop Hours, Coffeehouse, Puzzle . 6 Good Food, 7:00 p.m. Coop Calendar, Workslot Needs Event Sat, Jan 6 •Sustainable New Year: 4:30 p.m. Governance Information, Mission Statement . 7 Fri, Jan 19 •The Good Coffeehouse: Swing Street, 8:00 p.m. Workslot Needs . 7 Highlights Letters to the Editor . 9 Look for additional information about these and other events in this issue. Classified Ads . 11 06-12/21 p 01-07 12/20/06 8:28 PM Page 2 2 December 21, 2006 Park Slope Food Coop, Brooklyn, NY Giving What Comes Naturally CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 and tear of the neighborhood, advertising at all, except for Because it is not a nonprofit the General Coordinators point- the line item that covers the (it might more accurately be ed out, it makes sense for us to cost of a PSFC string shop- called a “no profit corpora- be part of maintaining it and to ping bag that goes to every tion”), donations to the Coop be well thought of. new member. itself are not entitled to a tax Does the Coop need to write-off. Therefore, people engage in public relations or The Coop, not easy to catego- who give items like computers advertising in the communi- rize by any means, largely and scanners to the Coop ty? In a sense, yes Holtz engages in ongoing non- receive no tax deduction. The believes: The Coop has large Coop could potentially turnover. Because it loses at seasonal gifts of food and labor receive a tax write-off for any least 20% of its membership in the neighborhood. Should donations it makes, but every year (at current levels, it—can it—do more? because its profit is so small, about 2,600 members), and in most years deliberately amounting to a loss, it has to Technically and legally, the nonexistent, such a tax bene- remain known and respected Coop is a cooperative corpo- fit would be negligible. in the community in order to ration governed by a statute Holtz commented that a attract new members. At pre- known as the New York State small annual profit would not sent there is no budget for Cooperative Corporation Law. necessarily be a bad thing for the Coop, as it could serve as a hedge against any decline in the investments support- ing the defined pension plan Do you have for Coop employees. If there were such a decline, and the actuaries managing the plan WINTER CLOTHES determined it was necessary to add funds, a profit margin ILLUSTRATION BY LYNN BERNSTEIN BY LYNN ILLUSTRATION would serve as the reserve to you can’t use? guarantee its viability. Several other members aside from what it already said they strongly support gives? “I think it could afford Members’ Views the Coop’s helping other $10-15,000.00 a year,” Holtz Someone else needs them! A brief informal survey of food Coops.
Recommended publications
  • Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium
    Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Ohio State University Alexandra Mary Jenkins, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Jared Gardner, Advisor Sean O’Sullivan Robyn Warhol Copyright by Alexandra Mary Jenkins 2014 Abstract Feminist activism in the United States and Europe during the 1960s and 1970s harnessed radical social thought and used innovative expressive forms in order to disrupt the “grand perspective” espoused by men in every field (Adorno 206). Feminist student activists often put their own female bodies on display to disrupt the disembodied “objective” thinking that still seemed to dominate the academy. The philosopher Theodor Adorno responded to one such action, the “bared breasts incident,” carried out by his radical students in Germany in 1969, in an essay, “Marginalia to Theory and Praxis.” In that essay, he defends himself against the students’ claim that he proved his lack of relevance to contemporary students when he failed to respond to the spectacle of their liberated bodies. He acknowledged that the protest movements seemed to offer thoughtful people a way “out of their self-isolation,” but ultimately, to replace philosophy with bodily spectacle would mean to miss the “infinitely progressive aspect of the separation of theory and praxis” (259, 266). Lisa Yun Lee argues that this separation continues to animate contemporary feminist debates, and that it is worth returning to Adorno’s reasoning, if we wish to understand women’s particular modes of theoretical ii insight in conversation with “grand perspectives” on cultural theory in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • The True Cost of American Food – Conference Proceedings
    i The True Cost of American Food – Conference proceedings Foreword Patrick Holden Founder and Chief Executive of the Sustainable Food Trust I am delighted to be writing this foreword for the proceedings of our conference. I hope it will be a useful resource for everyone with an interest in food systems externalities and True Cost Accounting; and that should include everyone who eats! The True Cost of American Food Conference brought together more than 600 participants to listen to high quality presentations from a wide range of leading experts, representing farming, food businesses, research and academic organizations, policy makers, NGOs, public health institutions, organizations representing civil society and food justice, the investment community, funding foundations and philanthropists. As an organization which has contributed in a significant way to the development of the conceptual framework for True Cost Accounting in food and farming, we were delighted that the conference attracted such an impressive attendance of leaders from a range of sectors, all actively committed to taking this initiative forward. Looking forward, clearly one of the key challenges is how we can best convey an easy-to- grasp understanding of True Cost Accounting to individual citizens, who have reasonably assumed until now that the price tag on individual food products reflects of the true costs involved in its production. As we have now come to realize, this is often far from the case; in fact it would be no exaggeration to state that the current food pricing system is dishonest, in that it fails to include the hidden impacts of the production system, both negative and positive, on the environment and public health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year of the Pig
    The Year of the Pig FOOD FORWARD FORUM Toolkit The China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation is a proactive environmental non-governmental organization and social legal entity working to protect the environment, preserve natural resources and biodiversity in China and all around the globe. Founded in 1985, it is China’s oldest environmental non-governmental organization. The Good Food Fund aims to facilitate shifts in food production, distribution, and consumption patterns towards a healthier and more sustainable food system, by supporting relevant research, communication, and entrepreneurship efforts. Toolkit research, creation, and compilation: Caroline Wimberly*, Wanqing Zhou*, and Yi-Wen Lee Design: Tingting Xiong Copyright © Good Food Fund August 2019 Special thanks to Mia MacDonald, Jian Yi, Tiran Zhang, Ruiqi Xie, Jieli Xie, Cecilia Zhou, Cui Xin, Hailey Chang, Wenjing Zhu, Shuman Liu, Adam Millman, Chelsey Toong, and Cheng Qiu for your input and assistance Food Forward Forum logo design: William Wilson, Yale Hospitality Food Forward Forum Partners: The contents of this toolkit do not necessarily reflect the official positions of any organization, institution, or private enterprise that partnered with or participated in the Food Forward Forum in February 2019 or any of the organizations, networks, corporations, or individuals described in the text. *Brighter Green Contents Part I – Background and the Basics 03 Introduction to some key terms and concepts about food Part II – Deeper Dive: The Issue Nexus 11
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving the Meatrix? Transformative Learning and Denialism in the Case of Meat Consumption
    Environmental Education Research ISSN: 1350-4622 (Print) 1469-5871 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ceer20 Leaving the Meatrix? Transformative learning and denialism in the case of meat consumption Reingard Spannring & Tomaž Grušovnik To cite this article: Reingard Spannring & Tomaž Grušovnik (2018): Leaving the Meatrix? Transformative learning and denialism in the case of meat consumption, Environmental Education Research, DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1455076 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455076 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 25 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 365 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ceer20 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455076 OPEN ACCESS Leaving the Meatrix? Transformative learning and denialism in the case of meat consumption Reingard Spannringa and Tomaž Grušovnikb aInstitute for Educational Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; bInstitute for Educational Sciences, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Despite growing evidence of many environmental and other problems being Received 27 April 2017 caused by industrialized meat production, the issue of meat consumption Accepted 8 March 2018 is still generally seen as a private affair that has nothing to do with politics KEYWORDS or education. This article problematizes meat consumption and discusses Transformative learning transformative learning theory in the light of the authors’ experiences with theory; meat consumption; denialism in critical meat education. It reveals the potential of a cross- denialism fertilization through which transformative learning theory gains complexity and critical meat education benefits from a more coherent theoretical and practical frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Fed Beef Training Manual
    Training Manual for Participants 4/4/2019 GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Forage Module Part I: Pasture Management Uma Karki, PhD Tuskegee University Cooperative Extension Program GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Pasture Improvement GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Pasture Improvement Steps • Soil test • Seed calculation • Weed control • Legume seed inoculation • pH amendment • Planting • Land preparation • After planting • Fertilizer application • Building organic matter • Selecting forages 1 4/4/2019 GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Find Out About Your Soil • NRCS Web soil survey - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byo0fBSnPCfjUHVZSl9EY19XM1k/edit • Use this tool to identify soil and other aspects of your pastureland • Soil type • Slope • Other properties • Step by step procedure to use this site is available at this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byo0fBSnPCfjUHVZSl9EY19XM1k/edi t GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Soil Test • Very important and the very first step • Regular soil test evaluates major nutrient contents and pH • Nutrients – plants need different nutrients for growth • Major nutrients - Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium • pH – Right pH is necessary for nutrient availability for plants • 5.8 – 6.5 pH suitable for most Southern forages • Legumes require higher pH than grasses - ≥6 - 7 GRASSFED BEEF IN THE SOUTHEAST: FROM SEED TO PLATE Soil Test.. • Collect representative samples - 15-20 random sub-samples in a zigzag manner from a plot (20 acres maximum area - one composite sample) with uniform soil having same forage and topography • Sample collection depth - 0-4 inches depth for perennial pastures, 0-6 inches or to the depth of tillage for annual pastures • Avoid areas such as shade, watering and feeding facilities, and manure piles.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Issues Research for English 120
    Nancy McEnery, Reference Librarian Napa Valley College Environmental Issues Research for English 120 The library is a great place to start your research for environmental issues because we have both print and digital sources of information. While there are many good sources of information freely available on the Web, oftentimes, the better sources of information require a subscription (to provide access to full-text articles). Napa Valley College Library has some great online databases that are available to you as a student and community member (all you need is a SNAP library card for off-campus access – see page 3). Typical Research Flow It is important to use a variety of information sources when conducting research. One approach is to start with print sources and work your way toward online information. You do not absolutely have to follow this sequence, but it helps to make sure you are covering all types of information available to you. Reference Books Circulating Books Articles from Online Databases The Web Associations 1 REFERENCE BOOKS Reference books provide general background information (facts, definitions, dates, details), assistance in focusing your topic, quick access to important factual and statistical information, and references to other sources of information. It is therefore a good place to begin your research. Subject-Specific Encyclopedia Examples Napa Valley College has the following subject-specific encyclopedias: Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Marc Bekoff, ed. Call Number: REF 179.3 Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of Global Warming and Climate Change. S. George Philander, ed. Call Number: REF 363.7387 v1-3. Pollution A to Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Dairy Management Conference 1
    Section A Wednesday 8:00 Welcome 8:10 No Room at the Inn: Stocking Density and Time Rick Grant Miner Institute Budgets 8:50 Animal Welfare: How Can We Assure the Consumer? Jim Reynolds University of California- Davis 9:30 Making the Most from Manure Deanne Meyer University of California 10:10 Break 10:30 The Latest on Cross Ventilation of Barns—Panel Joe Harner Kansas State University Discussion 11:30 Improving Dairy Cattle Welfare: Implications of Marina von University of British Columbia Freestall Housing on Behavior and Health Keyerlinkgk 12:10 Lunch 1:40 Straddling the Barbwire Fence: How Dairy Farmers Can Ben Yale Yale Law Office Legally Employ Immigrant Labor 2:20 Production and Markets: What Part of the Roller Mary Ledman Keough Ledman Associates Coaster are We on? 3:00 Break 3:30 Recognizing Stress, Anger, Depression, and Suicidal Robert Fetsch Colorado State University Thinking and Knowing What to do Next? 4:10 The Future of Ag Biotechnology: Who Prevails? Terry Etherton Pennsylvania State University 4:50 The Latest on Transition Cow Management Mike Overton University of Georgia 5:30 Adjourn Thursday 7:30 Reproductive Efficiency and Economics of Timed AI Carlos Risco University of Florida vs. Natural Service 8:10 Heat Detection and AI Technician Evaluation Joe Dalton University of Idaho 8:50 National Heifer Supply and the Effects of Sexed Semen Albert DeVries University of Florida 9:30 Break 10:00 Managing the Costs of Cow Mortality Frank Garry Colorado State University 10:40 What’s the Connection Between Animal Diseases and
    [Show full text]
  • The Simple Man's Burden
    Burden The Simple Man’s Observations and Reflections from Within the Complex Burden The Simple Man’s Observations and Reflections from Within the Complex Vergil Den © 2010, Vergil Den. First Edition No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage, and retrieval system without written permis- sion from both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Published by Aventine Press 750 State St. #319 San Diego CA, 92101 www.aventinepress.com ISBN: 1-59330-700-4 www.vergilden.com Printed in the United States of America ALL RIGHTS RESERVED For my wife and family whom I love dearly. Thank you for saving me and burning those damned suits. TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue 1 Chapter 1 - 6:17 AM – Ground Hog Day 9 Chapter 2 - 6:42 AM – Science as Fiction 15 Chapter 3 - 8:09 AM – Of Atrophy and Hypertrophy 27 Chapter 4 - 10:10 AM – The Upside-Down Map 37 Chapter 5 - 11:59 AM – Optimizing Our Nature 43 Chapter 6 - 1:27 PM – Danger Zone: Empty Suits 55 Chapter 7 - 2:22 PM – The “Stone Soup” Aside 69 Chapter 8 - 3:00 PM – Logic is in the Eye of the Beholder 75 Chapter 9 - 4:45 PM – Negative Power of Positive Thinking 85 Chapter 10 - 6:30 PM – Checking Out 95 Postscript 103 Glossary 113 Acknowledgments 117 Index 125 PROLOGUE Back in high school, my religion teacher Mr. Carey had us read vari- ous works from Henry David Thoreau.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Future Discussions
    Options for Future Discussions on Genetically Modified and Cloned Animals Proceedings from a workshop sponsored by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology and Michigan State University and including the paper... Engineering Animals: Ethical Issues and Deliberative Institutions Prepared for the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology by Sheila Jasanoff and Stefan Sperling (with Sang-Hyun Kim) Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology © Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced by any means, electronic or mechanical, without per- mission in writing from the publisher. This report was supported by a grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts to the University of Richmond. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Pew Charitable Trusts or the University of Richmond. THE PEW INitiatiVE ON FOOD AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Contents OPTIONS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSIONS ON GENETICALLY ModIFIED AND CLONED ANIMALS ................. 5 Proceedings from a workshop sponsored by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology and Michigan State University Preface .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Section 1: Discussion
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 16, ISSUE 5, November 2019
    VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 5 November 2019 ISSN 1948-352X Journal for Critical Animal Studies Editor Dr. Amber E. George Peer Reviewers Dr. Stephen R. Kauffman Michael Anderson Christian Vegetarian Association Drew University Zoie Mcneill Dr. Julie Andrzejewski Central European University St. Cloud State University Dr. Anthony J. Nocella II Mandy Bunten-Walberg Salt Lake Community College Independent Scholar Dr. Emily Patterson-Kane Sarat Colling American Veterinary Medical Independent Scholar Association Dr. Tara Cornelisse Dr. Nancy M. Rourke Center for Biological Diversity Canisius College Christian Dymond N. T. Rowan Queen Mary University of London York University Stephanie Eccles Jerika Sanderson Concordia University Independent Scholar Adam J. Fix Monica Sousa SUNY ESF York University Dr. Carrie P. Freeman Tayler E. Staneff Georgia State University University of Victoria Dr. Cathy B. Glenn Elizabeth Tavella Independent Scholar University of Chicago David Gould Dr. Siobhan Thomas University of Leeds London South Bank University Krista Hiddema Tyler Tully Royal Roads University University of Oxford William Huggins Dr. Rulon Wood Independent Scholar Boise State University i Contents Issue Introduction: Cultivating Nonhuman Animal pp. 1-2 Cruelty in Advertisements Amber E. George Essay: Animals in Advertising: War, Vulnerability, and pp. 3-28 the Return of the Repressed Bridget Sutherland and Paul Judge Book Review: The Anthropocentricity of the Future of pp. 29-37 Food: A Review of Meat Planet Richard Giles Author Biographies p. 38 JCAS Submission Guidelines pp. 39-40 ii Issue Introduction: Cultivating Nonhuman Animal Cruelty in Advertisements Amber E. George The media is saturated with imagery that uses nonhuman animals to send poignant messages about animal abuse and environmental issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation 7-06
    ENVIRONMENTALISM ON THE WEB: POLITICAL ACTIVISM IN THE AGE OF NEW MEDIA by DYLAN WOLFE (Under the Direction of Kevin DeLuca) ABSTRACT This dissertation is a study of the rhetoric of environmental activism in the communication context of new media. I specifically focus on how the rhetoric of environmental activism operates on the internet. The group of media technologies known as “new media” are characterized by a high volume of cursory message fragments circulating speedily yet detached from a clear distinction between producers and consumers. I propose that in this communication context, circulation of new media texts is rhizomatic, moving on lines of flight rather than clearly delineated pathways. Determining the force of rhetoric requires engagement of textual elements, a surveying of relationships between textual fragments and technological characteristics in a discursive plateau. In this study I offer resonance as a conceptual basis for considering the rhetoric of advocacy in new media communication. Resonance aligns the rhetoric of a text with potential viewers’ experiences in discourse. Resonant elements of a text challenge dominant meaning, seeking to articulate knowledge more favorably to environmentalists. In order to account for the implications of an image-centered communicative circumstance, I also forward image resonance, a counterpart and compliment to resonance. Image resonance aligns with the rhetorical forces at the surface of images with the communicative conditions of the accelerated and surface-oriented world. INDEX
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the Agricultural and Food Truck Transportation Industry
    ThreatsThreats toto thethe AgriculturalAgricultural andand FoodFood TruckTruck TransportationTransportation IndustryIndustry Kay Johnson Executive Vice President American Trucking Association Arlington, VA April 25, 2007 A United Voice Role Mission A national umbrella Communicate the important organization through role of modern animal which all stakeholders agriculture to our nation’s in animal agriculture and economy, productivity, and the food industry can vitality, security and work together to develop that animal well-being is programs and messages central to producing to reach consumers safe, high-quality, to enhance their affordable food and other understanding and products essential to our appreciation daily lives for food animal production ALLIANCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Executive Committee Board of Directors Don Butler, Chair Terry Prince, Ph.D. Dan Harper Murphy-Brown, LLC North American Nutrition Cos. The Duckling Council Don Dalton, Ex-Officio Paul Dubois, DVM Donna Stephens U.S. Poultry & Egg Assn. Cargill Animal Nutrition Bayer Animal Health Cliff Becker, Chair-elect John Adams Joel Newman Vance Publishing – Food 360° National Milk Producers Federation American Feed Industry Assn. Terry Stokes David Thomas Tracy Snider Nat’l Cattlemen's Beef Assn. Rabobank United Soybean Board Richard Lobb Peter Orwick Al Pope National Chicken Council American Sheep Industry Assn. United Egg Producers Chris Ashworth, DVM Bryan Oedzes Monsanto Company American Veal Association Brett Whitehead Jeff Hill, Ph. D. Intervet Premium Standard Farms
    [Show full text]