DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B – Projects by District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX B – PROJECTS BY DISTRICT 2019 - 2024 WORKINGCommonwealth DRAFT Transportation Board Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank 656 04/18/2018 FY2019-2024 Six-Year Improvement Program Appendix B - Projects by District FY19 DRAFT ($ in thousands) Appendix B - Projects by District Bristol Interstate (sorted by district, system, route, jurisdiction) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0077 098 - Wythe County T21385 #SGR-I77 over Cove Crk VA 2035 & 2036 Fed ID 19565 & 19566 $17,000 $17,000 0077 098 - Wythe County 103320 #HB2.FY17 Add merging lane on I-77N in Ft. Chiswell $6,893 $9,100 0077 098 - Wythe County 109512 I-77 Wythe Co. Median Barrier $925 $925 0081 086 - Smyth County 97555 I-81 BRIDGE PROJECT ROUTE 11 PE ONLY #17478 PE CN $13,820 $13,820 #17480 0081 086 - Smyth County 107117 #SGR I-81 STRUCTURES 17470 & 17472 OVER RTE. 686 $14,200 $14,200 0081 086 - Smyth County 109920 I-81 Shoulder Improvements - Smyth Co. $1,765 $1,765 0081 086 - Smyth County 111265 #SGR - I-81 NBL Smyth Co VA #2034 Federal Structure #17478 $12,500 $12,500 0081 095 - Washington 97856 INTERSTATE 81 AT EXIT 14 RAMP MODIFICATIONS $42,700 $42,700 County 0081 095 - Washington 109440 #HB2.FY17 I-81 Exit 19 Ramp Improvements $9,736 $9,736 County 0081 098 - Wythe County T21067 I-81 Median Barrier Safety Initiative - Wythe Co. $972 $972 0081 098 - Wythe County 104936 #SGR I-81 Structures 19596 & 19597 over Reed Creek in Wythe $23,500 $23,500 0081 M02 - Multi- 109419 #HB2.FY17 I-81 at State Route 75 (Exit 17) Interchange Mod. $24,955 $21,200 jurisdictional: Bristol MPO 0081 M02 - Multi- 110380 #HB2.FY17 I-81 AT RT 75 (Exit 17) INCHG GARVEE DEBT $27,472 $11,373 jurisdictional: Bristol SERVICE MPO 9999 961 - Bristol District- 110881 #SGR FY19 SGR Interstate PM1M $1,618 $1,618 wide Interstate Total $180,408 Primary (sorted by district, system, route, jurisdiction) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0011 086 - Smyth County 110796 #SMART18 - US 11 at SR 107 Int. Impr. w/radius $3,042 $3,042 0011 086 - Smyth County 110797 #SMART18 - US 11 at Railroad Drive Inter. Improvement $2,783 $2,783 0011 086 - Smyth County 110798 #SMART18 - US 11 at SR 16 Int. -Improve turning movement $942 $942 0011 095 - Washington 109921 U.S. Route 11 Shoulder Initiative - Washington Co. $2,025 $2,025 County 0011 095 - Washington 110794 #SMART18 - INT. IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCESS MGMT. Rtes. $1,113 $1,113 County 11 & 140 0011 095 - Washington 112750 Route 11 Structure 1021 over Sinking Creek - Fed ID 18844 $1,450 $1,450 County 0011 140 - Abingdon T21087 RTE.11 SIDEWALK EAST SIDE OF EAST MAIN ST. ABINGDON $52 $52 0016 086 - Smyth County T21069 Appalachian Trail Crossing - Route 16 Smyth Co. $1,200 $1,200 0016 092 - Tazewell County T21584 Rt 16 VA 1017 Fed ID 18399 Rt 601 VA 6151 Fed ID 18531 $700 $700 04/18/2018 657 FY2019-2024 Six-Year Improvement Program Appendix B - Projects by District FY19 DRAFT ($ in thousands) Bristol Primary (sorted by district, system, route, jurisdiction) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0016 158 - Tazewell T21316 #SGR-Fairground Rd Rt 16 Clin Riv Tazewell VA 1802 Fed 22544 $2,300 $2,300 0019 092 - Tazewell County 109504 #SGR ROUTE 19 STR 1135 NSRR & WRIGHTS VALLEY CREEK $2,800 $2,800 - 18461 0019 095 - Washington 110793 #SMART18 - Intersection improvements - Routes 11 and 19 $1,704 $1,704 County 0021 961 - Bristol District- 109513 US Route 21 Rumble Stripe Initiative $4,565 $4,565 wide 0023 052 - Lee County 105960 Bridge Repl - Rte 23 SBL over NSRR (Fed ID 10696) $1,900 $1,900 0023 084 - Scott County T21054 RTE. 23 INSTALL RUMBLE STRIPS, GUARDRAIL, DRAINAGE $563 $563 IMPROV. 0023 084 - Scott County 86598 SB&NB 23 over NF Holston R Va struc 1003 & 1108 FED ID 16543 $8,908 $8,908 0023 084 - Scott County 107125 US Route 23 Corridor Improvments in Weber City Area $2,050 $2,050 0023 097 - Wise County 103505 Bridge (Fed ID19255) Rte 23 Over Rte610&Powell River VA#1016 $1,949 $1,949 0023 097 - Wise County 107074 Route 23 Median Shoulders $2,511 $2,511 0023 097 - Wise County 111746 Route 23 and 671 Wise Co. - Dual Actuated Beacons $186 $186 0023 961 - Bristol District- 107073 US 23 Shoulder Initiative $2,800 $2,800 wide 0058 038 - Grayson County 109437 #HB2.FY17 - Route 21 and 58 Intersection Radius Improvement $250 $250 0058 052 - Lee County 86601 58 over Powell River Va struc 1045 $8,810 $8,810 0058 052 - Lee County 106513 US 58 Rumble Strips - Lee County $2,235 $2,235 0058 052 - Lee County 109439 #HB2.FY17 Add climbing lane to Rte. 58 Lee Co. $4,995 $4,995 0058 052 - Lee County 111272 #SMART18 - Rte. 58 Truck Climbing Lane Phase 2 $4,970 $5,320 0058 084 - Scott County 109438 #HB2.FY17 - US58/23 Access Management With Park & Ride $7,105 $7,105 0058 095 - Washington 16382 RTE 58 - PARALLEL LN-CORRIDOR DEV PE AND R/W ONLY IN $48,807 $48,807 County SYP 0058 146 - Norton T21262 #SGR-Route 58 VA Structure #1808 Federal #22453 $2,840 $2,840 0058 961 - Bristol District- 109923 Alternate Route 58 Shoulder Initiative -Lee Co. $1,635 $1,635 wide 0058 961 - Bristol District- 109924 U.S. 58 Rumble Stripe Initiative $3,110 $3,110 wide 0061 092 - Tazewell County T21329 #SGR Route 61 over Cove Crk Tazewell VA 1069 Fed ID 18469 $750 $750 0063 025 - Dickenson T21263 #SGR-Route 63 1042 over Russell Fork River - Fed ID 5792 $3,828 $3,828 County 0065 084 - Scott County T21560 Route 65 over Big Branch VA Structure 1098 Fed ID 16600 $505 $505 0067 148 - Richlands T21264 #SGR-2nd St Rt 67 Clinch Riv Richlands VA 1804 Fed 22469 $1,650 $1,650 0072 025 - Dickenson 109672 Route 72 Structure 1017 over Laurel Branch Fed ID 5798 $623 $623 County 0080 083 - Russell County T21185 Rte. 80 Russell Co. Rumble Strip Iniative $949 $949 0080 083 - Russell County 109922 Route 80 Shoulder Initiative $1,665 $1,665 0083 013 - Buchanan 107124 Route 83 Rumble Strip Initiative $3,616 $3,616 County 658 04/18/2018 FY2019-2024 Six-Year Improvement Program Appendix B - Projects by District FY19 DRAFT ($ in thousands) Bristol Primary (sorted by district, system, route, jurisdiction) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0083 025 - Dickenson 112292 Route 83 Shoulder Initiative - Dickenson Co. $5,094 $5,094 County 0091 095 - Washington 103503 Bridge (Fed ID 18969) Rte 91 Over Laurel Creek $2,460 $2,460 County 0107 086 - Smyth County 110795 #SMART18 - Add lane to Rte. 107 under I-81 exit 35 $2,516 $2,516 0121 013 - Buchanan 90282 121 CFX - 460 Corridor Q Poplar Creek Phase A Finish $199,289 $199,289 County 0224 084 - Scott County 104189 Safety Improvements-Rte. 224 (Phase II-remove curve) $4,641 $6,644 0460 013 - Buchanan 88140 Oversight Corridor Q - 460 Conn. 2, Interchange & Hawks Nest $174,191 $174,191 County 0460 013 - Buchanan 107072 US 460 Shoulder Initiative - Buchanan County $3,029 $3,029 County 0460 961 - Bristol District- 107122 District WIde PSI / TSN Intersection Improvements $500 $500 wide 9999 961 - Bristol District- 112855 #SGR F19/C19 PM1J Bland Primary $1,931 $1,931 wide 9999 961 - Bristol District- 112856 #SGR F19/C19 PM1K Wise Lee Dickenson Primary $999 $999 wide Primary Total $540,889 Secondary (sorted by district, system, jurisdiction, route) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0606 010 - Bland County 81548 606-010-6016_Bridge Superstructure Replacment_Fed Id 03062 $725 $725 0607 010 - Bland County 111636 Route 607 Bland Co Replace Struct 6057 Fed ID 3068 $653 $653 0608 010 - Bland County 104901 Bridge Repl-Skydusky Rd over Big Walker Crk (Fed ID 3071) $2,039 $2,039 0680 013 - Buchanan T21065 Buchanan County Route 680 Rumble Strips $1,394 $1,394 County 0708 038 - Grayson County 109180 RTE. 708 - Reconstruct and Surface-treat $358 $358 0811 052 - Lee County 86294 Route 811, Super Str Replacement, Fed ID 10995, Va str 6507 $1,000 $1,000 0627 084 - Scott County 101379 Bridge Replacement Rte 627 over Copper Ck (VA Str 6140) $2,853 $2,853 0609 092 - Tazewell County T21206 WIDENING EXISTING RTE. 609 $99 $99 0609 092 - Tazewell County 104773 Bridge Replacement Rte 609 over Little River (Fed ID 18548) $2,010 $2,010 0717 092 - Tazewell County 101374 Bridge Replacement Rte 717, Fed ID 18657 (VA Str 6113) $1,550 $1,550 0670 095 - Washington 105145 Bridge Repl-Gen Spr Rd over Wolf Creek (Fed ID 19089) $2,380 $2,380 County 0677 095 - Washington 104831 Bridge Repl-Watauga Rd over Fifteen Mile Creek(Fed ID 19098) $3,400 $3,400 County 0725 095 - Washington 104828 Bridge Repl-Tayor Valley Rd over Laurel Creek (Fed ID 19162) $1,740 $1,740 County 0743 095 - Washington 111428 Route 743 - Yellow Springs Road - Rural Rustic $80 $180 County 04/18/2018 659 FY2019-2024 Six-Year Improvement Program Appendix B - Projects by District FY19 DRAFT ($ in thousands) Bristol Secondary (sorted by district, system, jurisdiction, route) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 1203 095 - Washington 104994 Bridge Repl-Water St over Beaver Dam Creek (Fed ID 19212) $2,187 $2,187 County 0619 098 - Wythe County 112635 RTE. 619 - Reconstruct and surface-treat $544 $544 0664 098 - Wythe County 104902 Bridge Repl-Glade Road over Reed Creek (Fed ID 19734) $1,729 $1,729 9999 098 - Wythe County T21201 GROUSE RIDGE ROAD - RURAL ADDITION $270 $270 9999 098 - Wythe County T21192 READY MIX ROAD-RURAL ADDITION $127 $127 0665 221 - Gate City T21093 MANVILLE RD - REPLACE AND CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK $402 $402 9999 - 999991 BRISTOL SSYP $0 $11,556 Secondary Total $37,196 Urban (sorted by district, system, jurisdiction, route) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0058 101 - Big Stone Gap 110879 #SMART18 - Gilley Ave.
Recommended publications
  • Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service

    Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service

    GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 1996 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 I. THE MOUNT VERNON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • • • 7 II. THE CAPPER-CRAMTON ACT 21 III. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1931-1952 • 33 IV. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1952-1970 57 V. THE UNFINISHED PARKWAY. 87 VI. ARLINGTON HOUSE .•• . • 117 VII. THEODORE ROOSEVELT ISLAND . • 133 VIII. OTHER ADDITIONS AND SUBTRACTIONS • . • • . 147 Fort Hunt •.. • • . • • . • • . 147 Jones Point . • • . • • . • . • • . • • . • • • . 150 Dyke Marsh and Daingerfield Island . • • • . • • . • 153 Arlington Memorial Bridge, Memorial Drive, and Columbia Island • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . • 164 The Nevius Tract • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • 176 Merrywood and the Riverfront Above Chain Bridge • • • . 184 Fort Marcy . • • • • . • • • • . • • . • • • . 187 The Langley Tract and Turkey Run Farm • • • • . • • • 188 Glen Echo Park and Clara Barton National Historic site • 190 GWMP Loses Ground • • • . • • • • .. • . • • . • • • 197 INTRODUCTION The George Washington Memorial Parkway is among the most complex and unusual units of the national park system. The GWMP encompasses some 7,428 acres in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. For reasons that will later be explained, a small part of this acreage is not administered by its superintendent, and a greater amount of land formerly within GWMP now lies within another national park unit. Some of the GWMP acreage the superintendent administers is commonly known by other names, like Great Falls Park in Virginia and Glen Echo Park in Maryland. While most national park units may be characterized as predominantly natural, historical, or recreational, GWMP comprises such a diverse array of natural, historic, and recreational resources that it defies any such categorization. Further complicating matters, GWMP's superintendent also administers four other areas classed as discrete national park units-Arlington House, The Robert E.
  • The Judge Advocate Journal, Bulletin No. 31, January, 1961

    The Judge Advocate Journal, Bulletin No. 31, January, 1961

    Bulletin No. 31 .January, 1961 The Judge Advocate PR R F THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S SCHOOL LIBRARY Published By JUDGE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION An affiliated organization of the American Bar Association, composed of lawyers of all components of the Army, Navy, and Air Force Denrike Building Washington 5, D. C. JUDGE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION Officers for 1960-61 REGINALD c. HARMON, Virginia..........................................................Pl'C$ident ERNEST M. BRANNON, District of Columbia................ Pirst Vice Pnsident FREDERICK R. BOLTON, Michigan ................................ Second Vice Preside11t PENROSE L. ALBRIGHT, Virginia.... ..... ..................................... .Secretary CLIFFORD A. SHELDON, District of Columbia ............................... .. Trerrnurer JOHN RITCHIE, III, Illinois .......................... ........................Dele[!Clte to AB,1 Directors Joseph A. Avery, Va.; Franklin H. Berry, N. J.; Robert G. Burke, N. Y.; Perry H. Burnham, Colo.; Charles L. Decker, D C.; John H. Finger, Calif.; Robert A. Fitch, Va.; Osmer C. Fitts, Vt.; James Gar­ nett, Va.; George W. Hickman, Calif.; J. Fielding Jones, Va.; Stanley 'iV. Jones, Va.; Herbert M. Kidner, Pa.; Thomas H. King, Md.; Albert M. Kuhfeld, Va.; William C. Mott, Md.; Joseph F. O'Connell, Mass.; Alexander Pirnie, N. Y.; Gordon Simpson, Texas; Clio E. Straight, Va.; Moody R. Tid\Yell, Va.; Fred Wade, Pa.; Ralph W. Yarborough, Texas. Executive Secretary and Editor RICHARD H. LOVE Washington, D. C. Bulletin No. 31 January, 1961 Publication Notice The views expressed in articles printed herein are not to be regarded as those of the Judge Advocates Association or its officers and directors or of the editor unless expressly so stated. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE The Federal Legislative Process.............................................................. 1 The 1960 Annual Meeting........................................................................ 35 Limitation of Settlements Under FTCA.............................................
  • History of Roads in Fairfax County, Virginia from 1608

    History of Roads in Fairfax County, Virginia from 1608

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with with permission permission of the of copyright the copyright owner. owner.Further reproductionFurther reproduction prohibited without prohibited permission. without permission. A HISTORY OF ROADS IN FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1608-1840 by Heather K. Crowl submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Anthropology Chair: Richard J.
  • Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area

    Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area

    ....... County Une Parks -Arlington Ridge Boundary 1 inch: 900 feel l!Jppt~ll'Olt'd~tAd.,glQo!Cfll'li!)'G,l!;M1N)i'lgC.~ ~d~d..,d,QJ\llf~ •50 000 Feo1 C.f'CKI 14 •I $1•~•rlnjjlt.nv.11& l0<s.pa~•I JGkl!CnN "°~' Internet, see footnote 1 Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area 34 ARLINGTON H ISTORICAL M AGAZINE On the Street Where You Live: Arlington Ridge, Virginia BY MARTY SUYDAM What's in a name of a place? How did that name get decided? Whose life is now memorialized? The story of the names of places can represent a fascinating tale about the place where we live, yet often, know little about. We live in an area named Arlington Ridge, a topographic "finger" that points to Arlington House, the Lee mansion in Arlington Cemetery, through the area of the Pentagon. In the 1800's Anthony Fraser and James Roach owned the properties. Today, the following streets, clockwise from the north, bound the area: S. Joyce St, S. Glebe Road, and Army Navy Drive. Parts of the area have been known as: Green Valley, Club Manor Estates, Aurora Hills, Virginia Highlands, and Aurora Highlands. Most of the paved roadways in the immediate surroundings of South Nash Street are less than 100 years old. Though some roads date back to the Revolu­ tion, most have new names. 1 So, what is the name evolution on Arlington Ridge? The area was once part of the 1,000-acre estate of Anthony Fraser. The area was known as Green Valley, likely named for James Green, who lived on the land near the present location of the clubhouse at Army Navy Country Club.
  • Little Hunting Creek Bridge HAER No. VA-42D

    Little Hunting Creek Bridge HAER No. VA-42D

    Mount Vernon Memorial Highway: Little Hunting Creek Bridge HAER No. VA-42D Carries the Mount Vernon Memorial Highway over Little Hunting Creek along the Potomac, 8.6 miles south of 1-95 Mount Vernon Vicinity Fairfax County Virginia 3\ <*-> PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Recoi National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD MOUNT VERNON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY: LITTLE HUNTING CREEK BRIDGE b~$ HAER No. VA-42D Location: Carrying the Mount Vernon Memorial Highway across Little Hunting Creek at the Potomac, 8.6 miles south of 1-95 and 1.1 miles north of Mount Vernon in Fairfax County, Virginia, UTM: 18/319650/4286750 Quad.: Mount Vernon Date of Construction: Designed 1929, Completed 1932 Architect: Gilmore D. Clarke Engineer: E.J. Budge, Resident Engineer F.M. DeWaters, Assistant Resident Engineer J.V. McNary, Senior Engineer, U.S. Bureau of Public Roads Contractor: Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, New York, New York Present Owner George Washington Memorial Parkway National Park Service Department of the Interior Present Use: Vehicular bridge Significance: This parkway bridge is significant because it typifies the style of bridges which were designed for this new type of roadway. This bridge was designed to harmonize with the landscape by incorporating the natural shape of the arch, facing the bridge with native stone, and using careful attention regarding the plantings and landscape surroundin; the bridge. Historian: Elizabeth M. Nolin, 1988 LITTLE HUNTING CREEK BRIDGE HAER Mo. VA-42D (page 2) The final bridge on the Mount Vernon Memorial Highway (see HAER Mo.
  • Nomination Form, N.D

    Nomination Form, N.D

    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024--0018 (Rev. Au g. 2002) United States Department of the ln.terior Vt-fL 1z/10(0o National Park Service fJ tttf .~w NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any Item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative Items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor. or computer. to complete all items. ==================================================================================-===-======= 1. Name of Property =======================·-=================================--==============-===-===-==-======== historic name Arl ington Ridge Park (000-9707) '> other names/site number U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial (000-9707-0001/000-1233): Netherl3nds Carillon (000-9707- 0002/000-1239): Nevius Tract: lwo Jima Memorial -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------·----------------------------------------·-------------·--- ··---·--·---------------·-·-----------------------·--·-------------
  • Crystal City Vision Plan 2050

    Crystal City Vision Plan 2050

    CRYSTAL CITY VISION PLAN 2050 COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMUNITIES OF ARLINGTON RIDGE AND AURORA HIGHLANDS SUBMITTED TO THE LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY THE ARLINGTON RIDGE CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND AURORA HIGHLANDS CIVIC ASSOCIATION 17 August 2009 CRYSTAL CITY VISION PLAN 2050 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Prologue ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Our Vision ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Challenge ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Defining the ‘Community’ ............................................................................................................................ 8 Determining Community Benefit ................................................................................................................. 9 Requirements for Planning, Today and for the Future ............................................................................. 10 Concerns of the Community .....................................................................................................................
  • Prospect Hill As Seen Before Demolition in 1965

    Prospect Hill As Seen Before Demolition in 1965

    Courtesy of Arlington Historical Society The 1841 James Roach mansion on Prospect Hill as seen before demolition in 1965. 14 ARLINGTON HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Prospect Hill A Lost Arlington Historical Treasure BY SHERMAN w. PRATT In the 1960s, Arlington and Northern Virginia lost one of their most price­ less and unique historical assets with the rezoning and destruction of the ante­ bellum dwelling of early settler James Roach, standing majestically on Arling­ ton Ridge and overlooking the Capital City area. The dwelling dated from Arlington's early history after the Revolutionary War and the establishment of the Republic, when the area was still a part of the Capital City. In the late 1830s, Philip Roach, with his wife and two daughters and son James, arrived in Alexandria from his former home in Ireland. He immediately set about to find land upon which to establish a New World home for himself and his family. In due course, he focused on one of the most desirable and attractive pieces of real estate in Northern Virginia. The site was well elevated, located about a mile from the Potomac River, and today comprises approximately the northern portion of Arlington Ridge, parts of Crystal City, and Pentagon City and their nearby environs. The land was part of the 1669 original patent 1 of ship captain Robert Howson that was purchased by John Alexander, passed to his son Philip, and even­ tQally conveyed in 1811 to William Henry Washington. It was taken over· by the Bank of the United States in 1836, and then purchased by James Roach on June 29, 1837.2 The senior Roach died on June 9, 1838 at the age of 50, and James, still then residing in Alexandria, promptly looked around for a proper lo­ cation on which to build his home on his new property.
  • Appendix 3: Background of APS School Names APS Elementary Schools

    Appendix 3: Background of APS School Names APS Elementary Schools

    Appendix 3: Background of APS School Names APS Elementary Schools Abingdon – named for a planation in Arlington (part of its location is now included in the grounds of Reagan National Airport); associated with both the Custis family and the Alexander family for which Alexandria was named, both slaveholder families. Arlington Science Focus – named for the instructional focus of the school. Arlington Traditional – named for the instructional approach and focus of the school. Ashlawn – possibly named for Ash Lawn Plantation near Charlottesville, home of James Monroe, a slaveholder, Founding Father, U.S. Ambassador, Governor of Virginia, Secretary of State and War, 5th U.S. President and author of the Monroe Doctrine. Barcroft – named after the Barcroft Community House (built for the the Methodist Episcopal Church and housed the original Barcroft School until 1925) and the name of the local neighborhood and civic association where the school is located. Barrett – named for Kate Waller Barrett, prominent Virginia physician, humanitarian, philanthropist and social reformer. Campbell – named for Elizabeth Campbell, former APS School Board member and founder of WETA, and her husband, Edmund Campbell, legal representative for Arlington and Virginia families to declare the “Massive Resistance” segregation laws as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court Claremont – named for the Claremont neighborhood and civic association where the school is located, and name of a port town on the navigable portion of the James River. Discovery – named for the Discovery space shuttle and in remembrance of the mission flown by John Glenn, US astronaut, Senator and at one time, resident of the Discovery school neighborhood Drew – named for Dr.
  • USACE, Baltimore District Overview of Upcoming Work Opportunities SAME and ACEC Forum 17 June 2015

    USACE, Baltimore District Overview of Upcoming Work Opportunities SAME and ACEC Forum 17 June 2015

    USACE, Baltimore District Overview of upcoming work Opportunities SAME and ACEC Forum 17 June 2015 Presented by: William Tully, PE , DBIA Program Manager, Capital Area 6050 1st Street – Bldg 1444 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 Contact info: Phone: 202-345-7573 Email: [email protected] US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® BUILDING STRONG® Baltimore District: What are we known for? . One of the largest and most visible military missions in the country (National Capital Region) . Support to the Intelligence Community (NSA, DIA and others) . Support to the Port of Baltimore and regional economy . The Washington Aqueduct – drinking water for Washington DC . Protection and restoration of the Chesapeake Bay . Regional HTRW Design Center/National Military Munitions Design Center . Regulatory oversight for natural gas industry pipelines in PA’s Marcellus Shale Formation 2 BUILDING STRONG® Military Missions …through a very large military program in support of 12 military installations in the states of: USAMRIID, Fort Detrick Maryland NGA, Fort Belvoir Pennsylvania West Virginia District of Columbia Northern Virginia • Projects include design and construction of: USAMRICD, Aberdeen Administrative spaces DISA, Fort Meade Proving Ground Medical and laboratory facilities Training facilities Childcare centers Barracks • $1.9 billion program in the next 5 FYs • We made major contributions to the success of BRAC ’05 ($4.2 billion) Horse Stables, Fort Myer Lincoln Hall, Fort McNair BUILDING STRONG® Civil
  • M a R Y L a N D V I R G I N

    M a R Y L a N D V I R G I N

    300 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 12 26 SEP 2021 77°20'W 77°W 76°40'W 76°20'W 39°N Annapolis Washington D.C. 12289 Alexandria PISCATAWAY CREEK 38°40'N MARYLAND 12288 MATTAWOMAN CREEK PATUXENT RIVER PORT TOBACCO RIVER NANJEMOY CREEK 12285 WICOMICO 12286 RIVER 38°20'N ST. CLEMENTS BAY UPPER MACHODOC CREEK 12287 MATTOX CREEK POTOMAC RIVER ST. MARYS RIVER POPES CREEK NOMINI BAY YEOCOMICO RIVER Point Lookout COAN RIVER 38°N RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER Smith VIRGINIA Point 12233 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 12 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 12 ¢ 301 Chesapeake Bay, Potomac River (1) This chapter describes the Potomac River and the above the mouth; thence the controlling depth through numerous tributaries that empty into it; included are the dredged cuts is about 18 feet to Hains Point. The Coan, St. Marys, Yeocomico, Wicomico and Anacostia channels are maintained at or near project depths. For Rivers. Also described are the ports of Washington, DC, detailed channel information and minimum depths as and Alexandria and several smaller ports and landings on reported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), these waterways. use NOAA Electronic Navigational Charts. Surveys and (2) channel condition reports are available through a USACE COLREGS Demarcation Lines hydrographic survey website listed in Appendix A. (3) The lines established for Chesapeake Bay are (12) described in 33 CFR 80.510, chapter 2. Anchorages (13) Vessels bound up or down the river anchor anywhere (4) ENCs - US5VA22M, US5VA27M, US5MD41M, near the channel where the bottom is soft; vessels US5MD43M, US5MD44M, US4MD40M, US5MD40M sometimes anchor in Cornfield Harbor or St.
  • Known Wetlands Within the District of Columbia

    Known Wetlands Within the District of Columbia

    Government of District 36 of Columbia District Department of the of the Environment Water Quality Division 1200 First St. NE, 5th Floor Washington, DC 20002 (202) 535-2190 46 47 48 40 38 4 3 37 11 5 41 6 1 10 8 39 12 7 14 17 2 15 13 9 16 42 44 18 19 45 43 20 21 22 23 26 24 27 Key to Features 29 25 30 31 32 28 Wetlands Waterbodies 33 34 Known Wetlands within the Note: 1. Delineation based on 1996 field reconnaissance 2. Wetland boundaries shown are intended for District of Columbia planning purposes and do not reflect jurisdiction 35 under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Identified by Number 3. Wetlands shown do not include the Potomac and Anacostia open water areas. Source: District of Columbia Wetland Conservation Plan, 1997 3036Miles Projection: UTM spheroid Clarke 1866 Zone: 18 Date: January, 2001 The following is a list of the KNOWN wetlands in the District of Columbia based on the District of Columbia Wetland Conservation Plan (1997). There are many wetlands within the city that are not listed here including the open water areas of the Potomac and Anacostia. Wetland Location ADC Grid Longitude Latitude No. 1 Beaverdam Creek at Kenilworth Courts 11-D11 76-56'-38"/56'06" 38-54'-56"/54'-39" 2 Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens 11-B,C12 76-57'-00"/56'-28" 38-54'-54"/54'-30" 3 Fort Lincoln New Town between Rt. 50 and 11-C9 76-56'-39" 38-55'-02" Fort Lincoln cemetery 4 Fort Lincoln between Rt.