What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do for Us?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do for Us? Routledge Revivals What Did The Baby Boomers Ever Do For Us? First published in 2010, this book explores the legacy of the baby boomers: the generation who, born in the aftermath of the Second World War, came of age in the radical sixties where for the first time since the War, there was freedom, money, and safe sex. In this book, Francis Beckett argues that what began as the most radical-sounding generation for half a century turned into a random collection of youthful style gurus, sharp-toothed entrepreneurs and management consultants who believed revolution meant new ways of selling things; and Thatcherites, who thought freedom meant free markets, not free people. At last, it found its most complete expression in New Labour. The author argues that the children of the 1960s betrayed the genera- tions that came before and after, and that the true legacy of the swinging decade is in ashes. This page intentionally left blank What Did The Baby Boomers Ever Do For Us? Francis Beckett First published in 2010 by Biteback This edition first published in 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2010 Francis Beckett The right of Francis Beckett to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. Disclaimer The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact. A Library of Congress record exists under LC control number: 2010671722 ISBN 13: 978-1-138-94742-9 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-1-315-67003-4 (ebk) What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do For Us? Why the children o f the sixties lived the dream and failed the future Francis Beckett First published in Great Britain in 2010 by Biteback Publishing Ltd Heal House 375 Kennington Lane London SE11 5QY Copyright © Francis Beckett 2010 Francis Beckett has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. Ah rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the publisher s prior permission in writing. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition, including this condition, being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. ISBN 978-1-84954-026-1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Set in Joanna by SoapBox, soapboxcommunications.co.uk Printed and bound in Great Britain byTJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall Contents Author’s note and acknowledgements vii Introduction ix 1. How the baby boomers got their freedom: 1945-51 1 2. When we were very young: 19 5 0-5 6 14 3. The cradle of the sixties: 1956 29 4. The baby boomers go to school 47 5. What if Mr Macmillan’s out? 1957-63 61 6. The very model of a modern fluent technocrat: 1964-67 78 7. The end of the adventure: 1968 97 8. How the baby boomers destroyed the trade unions and made Thatcherism: 1969-79 118 9. The radical conservatives: 19 7 9-9 7 144 10. The baby boomer Prime Ministers: 1994-2010 163 11. The children of the baby boomers 180 Notes 199 Index 207 This page intentionally left blank Author’s note and acknowledgements The precise definition of a baby boomer is disputed, but I have defined it as anyone born between 1945 and 1955. David Willetts in his book The Pinch defines it very differently, as people born between 1945 and 1965, but he is quite wrong, because this period contains not one but two baby booms, separated by a small slump. The classic baby boom­ ers, born between 1945 and 1955, were a completely different sort of generation from those born at the start of the sixties. The complaint may be made that I have not written an objective history of the sixties, but have selected those events and quotes that bear out my thesis. I have a ready answer to this, which is: yup, thats what I’ve done. I have told the story of the baby boomer generation partly through the lives of individuals. Among many others, I have made use of the lives of the only two baby boomer Prime Ministers Britain has ever had, or is ever likely to have, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown; of the singer Marianne Faithfull, whose autobiography Faithfull is full of insights into what the children of the sixties thought they were, and what they really were; of the student-Trotskyist-turned-far-right-commentator Peter Hitchens and of Paul Mackney, student Trotskyist who kept the faith and became an important and successful trade union leader; and of Greg Dyke, representing that part of the baby boomer generation which made a fortune in business, in a peculiarly sixties way. I’m particularly grateful to three of them - Greg Dyke, Peter Hitchens and Paul Mackney - for long and illuminating interviews; and to Gordon Brown for an interview while I was writing his biography, which has helped me here too. Other baby boomers make occasional appearances, and some of them have been kind enough to read and comment on certain passages and chapters, or to help with information. They include Eddie Barrett and Tony Russell, who between them — or so it seems to me — know V ll everything there is to know about popular music (and this book was completed in Eddie Barrett’s charming house in Calabria, looking out at islands and mountains). They also include the playwright Steve Gooch, and old university friends who were especially helpful on 1968: Mike Brereton, Malcolm Clarke, Marshall Colman, John Howkins, Marina Lewycka, Linden West and Martin Yarnit. I also want to thank the readers of U3A News, the magazine of the University of the Third Age, and the best place in the world for anyone writing about events in the last fifty years or so to find people who will remember them. Among the generation betrayed by the baby boomers, I would like to thank in particular two Leeds University graduates in their twenties for information and insights: my son Peter Beckett, now a political lob­ byist, and the former National Union of Students president Kat Fletcher. yin Introduction The baby boomers saw themselves as pioneers of a new world — freer, fresher, fairer and infinitely more fun. But they were wrong. The world they made for their children to live in is a far harsher one than the world they inherited. The first of the men and women born in the baby boom that followed the Second World War started to come of age in the radical six­ ties. Not since 1918 had the young talked serious revolutionary politics as they did in the sixties. But in 1918, the men who came back from the war knew that the world was amiss, and knew what they wanted to do about it. So when at last the generation that fought the First World War came to power, in 1945 under Major Clement Attlee, they changed the world. The 1942 Beveridge Report had called for the abolition of the ‘five giants’ - Want, Ignorance, Disease, Squalor and Idleness - and between 1945 and 1951, despite a war-ruined economy, the Attlee government set about a systematic and remarkably successful assault on those evils. Exactly fifty years later, revolutionary talk was heard across the land again. But the generation of 1968 was not at all like the generation of 1918. Sixties radicalism decayed fast. It decayed, not because it was groundless, but because it was not grounded. What began as the most radical-sounding generation for half a century turned into a random collection of youthful style gurus who thought the revolution was about fashion; sharp-toothed entrepreneurs and management consultants who believed revolution meant new ways of selling things; andThatcherites, who thought freedom meant free markets, not free people. At last it decayed into New Labour, which had no idea what either revolution or freedom meant, but rather liked the sound of the words. The sixties really began in 1956 with John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger, but few people noticed until the Beatles released ‘Love Me Do’ in October 1962. By then the oldest of the baby boomers were fully seventeen years IX old, and within three years they were to know everything there was to know, from the secrets of the universe to the correct way to roll a joint. The short sixties - from the release o f‘Love Me Do’ to the student sit-ins and the Paris événements of summer 1968 - was a wonderful time to be young.
Recommended publications
  • The Communist Party of Great Britain Since 1920 Also by David Renton
    The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 Also by David Renton RED SHIRTS AND BLACK: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in Oxford in the ‘Thirties FASCISM: Theory and Practice FASCISM, ANTI-FASCISM AND BRITAIN IN THE 1940s THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: A Century of Wars and Revolutions? (with Keith Flett) SOCIALISM IN LIVERPOOL: Episodes in a History of Working-Class Struggle THIS ROUGH GAME: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in European History MARX ON GLOBALISATION CLASSICAL MARXISM: Socialist Theory and the Second International The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 James Eaden and David Renton © James Eaden and David Renton 2002 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2002 978-0-333-94968-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2002 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socialist Schism
    A Socialist Schism: British socialists' reaction to the downfall of Milošević by Andrew Michael William Cragg Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Marsha Siefert Second Reader: Professor Vladimir Petrović CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright notice Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This work charts the contemporary history of the socialist press in Britain, investigating its coverage of world events in the aftermath of the fall of state socialism. In order to do this, two case studies are considered: firstly, the seventy-eight day NATO bombing campaign over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, and secondly, the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in October of 2000. The British socialist press analysis is focused on the Morning Star, the only English-language socialist daily newspaper in the world, and the multiple publications affiliated to minor British socialist parties such as the Socialist Workers’ Party and the Communist Party of Great Britain (Provisional Central Committee). The thesis outlines a broad history of the British socialist movement and its media, before moving on to consider the case studies in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturliste
    Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Sommersemester 2007 Institut für Politische Wissenschaft und Soziologie Hauptseminar für den Magister-Studiengang: Tony Blair und New Labour. Was bleibt? Dr. Brigitte Seebacher Literaturliste Signatur Titel A 06-07035 Astle, Julian (Ed.): Britain after Blair : a Liberal agenda. London 2006 POL 500 GROS Beck Becker, Bernd: Politik in Großbritannien. Paderborn 2002 X 08480/2001, 5 Suppl. Bischoff, Joachim / Lieber, Christoph: Epochenbegriff. „Soziale Gerechtigkeit“. Hamburg 2001 A 98-00618 Blair, Tony: Meine Vision. London 1997 A 05-04584 Coates, David: Prolonged labour : the slow birth of New Labour in Britain. Basingstoke 2005 A 06-03088 Coughlin, Con: American Ally. Tony Blair and the War on Terror. London 2006 A 00-04093 Dixon, Keith: Ein würdiger Erbe. Anthony Blair und der Thatcherismus. Konstanz 2000 C 06-00792 Haworth, Alan / Hayter, Dianne: Men Who Made Labour. 2006 A 06-07010 Hennessy, Peter: The prime minister. The office and its holders since 1945. London 2001 POL 500 GROS Hüb Hübner, Emil: Das politische System Großbritannien. Eine Einführung. 1999 [im Bestand nur die Auflage von 1998] A 06-07017 Jenkins, Simon: Thatcher & Sons: A Revolution in Three Acts. London 2006 A 06-00968 Kandel, Johannes: Der Nordirland Konflikt. Bonn 2005 POL 900 GROS Kaste Kastendiek, H / Sturm, R: (Hrsg): Länderbericht Großbritannien, Bonn 2006 (3. Aktualisierte und neu bearbeitete Auflage der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. POL 500 GROS Krumm Krumm, Thomas/ Noetzel, Thomas: Das Regierungssystem Großbritanniens. Eine Einführung. München 2006. POL 500 GROS Leach Leach, Robert/ u.a.: British politics. Basingstoke 2006 A 05-04568 Leonard, Dick: A century of premiers. Salisbury to Blair.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Byron Criticism in the Age of Margaret Thatcher and Michael
    1 Byron Criticism in the age of Margaret Thatcher and Michael Foot (6053 words) By Jonathan Gross, DePaul University In Nice Work, David Lodge describes Robyn Penhurst‟s failed efforts to obtain a job at Cambridge University, her alma mater.1 Peter, a mediocre Ph.d. candidate plays it safe in a tight academic job market by writing a dissertation on the Romantic Sublime in Literature, while Robyn‟s post-structuralism so threatens her colleagues that she is dismissed. Lodge based the novel on a well known incident (the MacCabe affair) in which a young lecturer, Colin MacCabe, was denied the Cambridge equivalent of tenure in 1981 in a standoff between F.R. Leavis‟ acolytes and Frank Kermode. The two-day debate in the University Senate that followed this affair was only exacerbated by Margaret Thatcher‟s cuts to university research funds and tenure appointments.2 Two books came out the same year as David Lodge‟s portrait of Thatcher‟s England: Malcolm Kelsall‟s Byron’s Politics (1987) and Michael Foot‟s The Politics of Paradise: A Vindication of Byron (1988). These books I will argue, were no less determined by the particular conflicts and tensions of Thatcher‟s England, in particular the fight between labor and laissez faire economics. Michael Foot was the leader of the opposition Labour party from 1980-1983, a period in which he spoke on nuclear proliferation34, at Kelsall‟s own university in Cardiff, Wales. Foot opposed Margaret Thatcher‟s efforts to break up trade unions that governed mining in Wales, a constituency (Ebbw Vale) Foot represented in Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Thought of Aneurin Bevan Nye Davies Thesis
    The Political Thought of Aneurin Bevan Nye Davies Thesis submitted to Cardiff University in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Law and Politics September 2019 DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of …………………………(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… WORD COUNT 77,992 (Excluding summary, acknowledgements, declarations, contents pages, appendices, tables, diagrams and figures, references, bibliography, footnotes and endnotes) Summary Today Aneurin Bevan is a revered figure in British politics, celebrated for his role as founder one of the country’s most cherished institutions, the National Health Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York
    promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author produced version of a paper published in Political Quarterly White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/78536 Paper: Theakston, K and Gill, M (2011) The Postwar Premiership League. Political Quarterly, 82 (1). 67 - 80. ISSN 0032-3179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02170.x White Rose Research Online [email protected] The Post-war Premiership League Kevin Theakston and Mark Gill Who has been the best British prime minister since the Second World War? As David Cameron passes up and down the Grand Staircase in Number 10 Downing Street every day, the portraits of his predecessors as prime minister stare down at him. They are arranged in chronological order, with the most recent at the top of the stairs. If they were to be arranged in order of greatness, success or effectiveness in office, or policy achievement and legacy, the sequence would look very different. We report here the results from the latest survey of academic experts polled on the performance of post-1945 prime ministers. Academic specialists in British politics and history rate Clement Attlee as the best post-war prime minister, with Margaret Thatcher in second place just ahead of Tony Blair in third place. Gordon Brown’s stint in Number 10 was the third- worst since the Second World War, according to the respondents to the survey that rated his premiership as less successful than that of John Major.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Tribune, December 3, 1943, in Paul Anderson ed. Orwell in Tribune (London: Politico’s, 2006), 57. 2. Margaret Tapster, WW2 People’s War, an online archive of wartime memories con- tributed by members of the public and gathered by the BBC. The archive can be found at bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/ 65/a5827665.shtml Accessed May 30, 2013. 3. Paul Addison, No Turning Back: The Peacetime Revolutions of Post-War Britain (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010); Peter Hennessy, Having It So Good: Britain in the Fifties (London: Allen Lane, 2006); David Kynaston Aus- terity Britain, 1945–51 (London, Berlin and New York: Bloomsbury, 2007); David Kynaston, Family Britain, 1951–1957 (London, Berlin, New York: Bloomsbury, 2009); Mark Donnelly, Sixties Britain: Culture, Society and Politics (Harlow: Pearson, 2005); Alwyn W. Turner, Crisis? What Crisis? Britain in the 1970s (London: Aurum Press, 2008); Andy Beckett, When the Lights Went Out: Britain in the Seventies (London: Faber and Faber, 2009); Dominic Sandbrook, Seasons in the Sun: The Battle for Britain, 1974–1979 (London: Allen Lane, 2012); Alwyn W. Turner, Rejoice! Rejoice! Britain in the 1980s (London: Aurum, 2010) and Andy McSmith, No Such Thing as Society: A History of Britain in the 1980s (London: Constable, 2011). 4. British and European resistance to American culture is expounded by Dick Hebdige, Subculture: The Meaning of Style (London and New York: Routledge, 1979); Rob Kroes et al. Cultural Transmissions and Receptions: American Mass Culture in Europe (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1993) and Rob Kroes, If You’ve Seen One, You’ve Seen the Mall: Europeans and American Mass Culture (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Fascist in the Family
    John Beckett was a political chameleon: first at one with the fist- clenching left, then in awe of the goose-stepping fascists. He was also a Walter Mitty so who really knows? This author does. Francis Beckett’s personal partiality doesn’t blunt his fine jour- nalist’s pen nor cloud his judgement and integrity; but the pain shines through. He writes with compelling candour about his father. It is as moving for the reader as it must have been painful for the author. Alastair Stewart OBE, ITV News The youngest Labour MP in 1925, by 1940 John Beckett was in prison as a danger to the war effort. His son has written a coura- geously honest, moving and sensitive account of a socialist who ended up despising the workers, a Jew who ended up hating Jews, a democrat who became contemptuous of democracy. It is a pene- trating analysis of the political times in which he lived, not least because it illuminates the conditions that can – if freedom is not strong, vigilant and purposeful – breed bigotry and fascism. It is a valuable history as well as an instructive biography. Neil Kinnock, Leader of the Labour Party 1983–92 A fascinating insight into the unsavoury practices of the security services, and a moving portrait of a talented, wayward father who denied his Jewishness at great cost to himself and all around him. Paul Routledge, political biographer and commentator for the Daily Mirror and Tribune magazine, UK John Beckett was a Labour MP who later took up with fascism. In Fascist in the Family his son Francis, journalist, historian and play- wright, engages in the difficult task of tracing his father’s tempestu- ous and ultimately unfulfilled life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Working-Class and Post-War Britain in Pete Townshend's
    Class, Youth, and Dirty Jobs: the working-class and post-war Britain in Pete Townshend’s Quadrophenia This chapter examines Pete Townshend’s Quadrophenia (1973) and the way in which it depicts continuity and change in the lives of the British working-class in the period that the album documents (1964/5), the political milieu in which it was written (1972/3), and the legacy of the concept that was depicted in the screen version directed by Franc Roddam (1978/9).1 Quadrophenia was recorded and released in a fraught period of industrial militancy in Britain that had not been witnessed since the general strike of 1926.2 The album can be ‘read’ as both a social history of an element of youth culture in the mid-1960s, but also a reflection on contemporary anxieties relating to youth, class, race, and national identity in the period 1972/3.3 Similarly, the cinematic version of Quadrophenia was conceived and directed in 1978/9 in the months prior to and after Margaret Thatcher was swept to power, ushering in a long period of Conservative politics that economically, socially, and culturally reshaped British society.4 Quadrophenia is a significant historical source for ‘reading’ these pivotal years and providing a sense of how musicians and writers were both reflecting and dramatizing a sense of ‘crisis’, ‘continuity’, and ‘change’ in working-class Britain.5 Along with the novels and films of the English ‘new wave’ and contemporary sociological examinations of working-class communities and youth culture, Quadrophenia represents a classic slice of ‘social realism’, social history, and political commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cynical State
    THE CYNICAL STATE COLIN LEYS ‘Mendacity is a system that we live in’. (Tennessee Williams, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof) overnments have always lied. They naturally deny it, even long after it Gis abundantly clear that they have lied, trailing multiple red herrings, dismissing inconvenient evidence, implying that there is counter-evidence they are not free to produce. When a lie can no longer be credibly denied it is justified, usually by an appeal to the national interest. Governments of modern representative democracies are no different, even if they are more liable than dictators to be exposed. Half-truths and outright lies are routinely told. Facts are routinely concealed. Files are unaccountably lost. Tapes are mysteriously erased. Democratic checks and balances are rarely effective and the public’s collective memory is short. Even so, in recent years state cynicism has broken new ground. The British government’s flagrant abuse of military intelligence to persuade parliament and the public to endorse its attack on Iraq was a dramatic case in point. In July 2003, soon after the official end of the war, a British government weapons expert, David Kelly, killed himself after being revealed as the source for a BBC report that the government’s dossier outlining the intelligence had been knowingly ‘sexed up’. The government appointed a reliable judge, Lord Hutton, to hold a public enquiry into Kelly’s death. The evidence given to the enquiry showed that the Prime Minister’s staff had been working flat out to make it appear that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to Britain that would justify invading Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • British Fascism from a Transnational Perspective, 1923 to 1939
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive Breaking Boundaries: British Fascism from a Transnational Perspective, 1923 to 1939 MAY, Rob Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/26108/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version MAY, Rob (2019). Breaking Boundaries: British Fascism from a Transnational Perspective, 1923 to 1939. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Breaking Boundaries: British Fascism from a Transnational Perspective, 1923 to 1939 Robert May A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2019 I hereby declare that: 1. I have been enrolled for another award of the University, or other academic or professional organisation, whilst undertaking my research degree. I was an enrolled student for the following award: Postgraduate Certificate in Arts and Humanities Research University of Hull 2. None of the material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award. 3. I am aware of and understand the University's policy on plagiarism and certify that this thesis is my own work. The use of all published or other sources of material consulted have been properly and fully acknowledged. 4. The work undertaken towards the thesis has been conducted in accordance with the SHU Principles of Integrity in Research and the SHU Research Ethics Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Robinson, Emily. 2010. Our Historic Mission' Party Political Pasts And
    Robinson, Emily. 2010. Our Historic Mission’ Party Political Pasts and Futures in Contemporary Britain. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [Thesis] https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/29014/ The version presented here may differ from the published, performed or presented work. Please go to the persistent GRO record above for more information. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Goldsmiths, University of London via the following email address: [email protected]. The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. For more information, please contact the GRO team: [email protected] 'Our Historic Mission' Party Political Pasts and Futures in Contemporary Britain Emily Robinson Goldsmiths College, University of London PhD 2010 ABSTRACf The temporal positioning of political parties is an important aspect of their philosophical stance. This cannot simply be characterised as forward-facing progressivism and backwards-looking conservatism; since at least the late nineteenth century both progressive and conservative positions have involved a complex combination of nostalgia, obligation and inheritance. But while conservatives have emphasised a filial duty towards the past as enduring tradition, progressives have stressed the need to bear memories of past injustice forward, in order to achieve a different future. The contention of this thesis is that since the late 1970s these temporal positions have begun to dissolve. Both Labour and the Conservatives now favour what might be termed an 'affirmative presentist' approach to political time, whereby the present is viewed as both the 'achievement' of the past and the 'creator' of the future.
    [Show full text]