Chronicles Newsletter of the UCSD Emeriti Association

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chronicles Newsletter of the UCSD Emeriti Association Chronicles Newsletter of the UCSD Emeriti Association September 2009 Volume IX, No. 1 ARMS AND THE SCIENTIST: HERB YORK’S R ACE AGAINST OBLIVION By Sandy Lakoff on the “cardinal decisions” – those af- fecting war and peace. In 1604 – at the early dawn of the The partnership was uneasy on both modern era – Francis Bacon predicted sides. Politicians already felt, with Clem- that science would become a novum orga- enceau, that war was too important to num – a new instrument – through which be left to the generals. Now they came humanity would acquire ever greater to believe that it should no more be en- command over the forces of nature. trusted to a “scientific and technological Herb York belonged to a generation of elite,” as President Eisenhower warned physicists who lived and worked during in his farewell address. When Niels Bohr a time when that prophecy was fulfilled, tried to persuade Churchill to inform the in fateful form, by research showing that Soviets of the bomb project so as to fore- the tremendous energy locked in the nu- stall a post-war arms race, he was rudely cleus of the atom could be released and rebuffed. “I did not like the man when put to controlled use. The application of you showed him to me, with his hair this knowledge to the development of Herb York all over his head, at Downing Street,” atomic explosives determined the path Portrait by Manuel Rotenberg Churchill growled to his scientific advis- of Herb’s career. As he worked to build er. President Truman was just as dismis- and design these devices, he grew to un- technologists were admitted, sometimes sive when Leo Szilard tried to persuade derstand the terrible perils they pose and grudgingly and suspiciously, to the cor- him and Secretary of State Byrnes to therefore did his utmost to end the arms ridors of political power. “With the dis- demonstrate the bomb rather than use it competition he described as a “race to covery of fission,” C. P. Snow remarked, against Japan. Years after Robert Oppen- oblivion.” “physicists became almost overnight, the heimer gained honor and fame as direc- In 1943, as a precocious 21-year old, most important military resource a na- tor of the Los Alamos Laboratory, where he was drawn out of graduate studies tion-state could call upon.” For the first the first bombs were built and tested, he at Berkeley to work in the Manhattan time in history, he observed, they were was declared a “security risk” because Project “Rad Lab” run by his mentor and being asked on a regular basis to advise during the war he had misled security of- Nobel laureate Ernest O. Lawrence. In ficers (to protect innocent friends) and earlier times, scientists and engineers socialized with radicals. had bent their talents only sporadically For their part, scientists had conflict- to improving the arts of war. As a result ing feelings about working on defense v v v v v v of their role in World War II they en- Inside projects. Norbert Wiener, the math- tered into a new symbiotic relationship President’s Message. 3 ematician and father of cybernetics, de- with politicians. Science was now seen as cided early on to have nothing to do with an “endless frontier” that would provide The Budget Crisis & UCSD. 4 military applications. Alvin Weinberg, not only national security but also con- Mentoring Program . 6 Director of the Oak Ridge lab, called the tinued prosperity. Government became dependence of science on government Anecdotage . 7 the patron of science, at first especially support a “Faustian bargain.” The same of military “R&D” and eventually across Mark Your Calendar . 8 Robert Oppenheimer who said, after the board. In exchange, scientists and Continued on p.2 ➝ UCSD Emeriti Association Page 2 September 2009 v Chronicles the atomic bomb was dropped over Ja- pact on him while he was growing up in York became more his own man and grew pan, “we scientists have tasted sin” also Rochester, New York. He followed cur- accustomed, through service on a series remarked, upon learning of a new ap- rent events in the newspapers but was of committees, to give his views as a spe- proach to designing the H-bomb, “when most fascinated by a book on astronomy cialist on technical feasibility. On one of you see something technically sweet, you that opened his mind to science. When those committees, he was at first reluc- go ahead and do it and you argue about the atomic bombs used against Hiro- tant to join the other scientists in going it only after you have had your technical shima and Nagasaki brought the war to beyond a technical evaluation of how a success.” Hans Bethe said that he agreed an end, York shared the general elation, test ban might be verified to add an opin- to work on the “Super” in the hope “that convinced that the bombings had saved ion about its strategic and political advis- it might be possible to prove that ther- perhaps a million American casualties ability. That experience persuaded him to monuclear reactions were not feasible and even more among the Japanese. be more forthcoming because he realized at all.” Szilard, who had urged Albert Afterward, Lawrence “wangled” that if scientists were asked about ways Einstein to warn President Roosevelt (Herb’s word) a combined appointment to restrain the arms race, they should ex- that the Germans were working on mak- for him teaching physics and doing re- press their opinions, in view of their “spe- ing military use of atomic energy, was so search at the Rad Lab. When, at the cial knowledge”: they “understand better appalled by the prospect of atomic war- urging of Edward Teller, a new lab was than others the thermonuclear horror fare that in 1946 he gave up physics and opened at Livermore to work on the H- that is always only thirty minutes away turned to biology – before the science of bomb, York was tapped, again by Law- from happening.” life ironically became another potential rence, to be its director. Given his close In four months at the White House, route to weapons of mass destruction. ties to Lawrence and his new role run- and afterward for three years in the Pen- York, like most scientists in all the ning the lab, it is perhaps not surprising tagon, where he became Chief Scientist countries involved in the war and subse- that when news that Oppenheimer had of the new Advanced Research Projects quently in the Cold War, did not hesitate been branded a security risk aroused ire Agency (now DARPA) and then Direc- to pitch in. He was thrilled to be asked among physicists, many of whom were fu- tor of Defense Research and Engineer- by Lawrence to work (along with Hugh rious at Teller for testifying against him, ing under Eisenhower and briefly under Bradner) on one of the techniques for York, like Lawrence, was conspicuously President Kennedy, he found himself separating the U-235 isotope of uranium silent. York gave Teller a central role at resisting efforts by “hard-sell technolo- needed for the first bomb. As victory the lab, including a veto power over all gists” to push all sorts of impractical and loomed in Europe but Japan continued scientific elements during the first year, costly schemes, justifying them by worst- to resist, Szilard and James Franck cir- and thought he did an excellent job. case scenarios of what the Russians were culated a petition at Chicago and Los It was only later that York made up to. He would later agree with Robert Alamos calling on our government not amends by writing The Advisors, a study McNamara that the arms race was fu- to use the atomic bomb as a weapon but of the conflict over the crash program in elled by an “action-reaction syndrome” to arrange a demonstration of its destruc- which he defended Oppenheimer’s pro- in which our side was usually the initiator. tive power to persuade the Japanese to posal to sound out the Soviets about a He came to appreciate the critical stance make peace. York said later that the issue mutual moratorium before proceeding to of public-advocacy groups like the Fed- did not arouse much concern at Berkeley build a weapon that would be so unnec- eration of American Scientists (in which and Oak Ridge. The culture of the Rad essarily destructive. In his later memoir, he became a leading figure) and took part Lab reflected the attitude of Lawrence, a however, York said nothing at all about in Pugwash meetings with Soviet coun- prototypical American pragmatist and an any feelings he may have had about the terparts, hoping to promote arms control experimentalist rather than an abstract treatment of Oppenheimer, at the time and limitations on nuclear testing. But he theoretician. Lawrence said at the time, or later. This behavior on York’s part did confessed frustration at the debates that York recalled, “that such matters were not necessarily indicate agreement with were swirling around nuclear weapons at best left in the hands of the higher politi- Teller that the H-bomb was needed, nor the time. The scientists’ public-interest cal and military authorities . Scientists, is it likely to have been a case of simple groups were correct in their warnings, he said, especially younger ones, should opportunism. The most plausible expla- he felt, but their prescriptions of what to not waste precious working time on ex- nation is that at the time he was still very do about the problems were often naïve traneous issues for which they had no much under the spell of his institutional and biased.
Recommended publications
  • Marye Anne Fox Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8fn19bp No online items Marye Anne Fox Papers Finding aid prepared by Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California, 92093-0175 858-534-2533 [email protected] Copyright 2014 Marye Anne Fox Papers MSS 0764 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Marye Anne Fox Papers Identifier/Call Number: MSS 0764 Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California, 92093-0175 Languages: English Physical Description: 2.0 Linear feet (5 archives boxes) Date (inclusive): 1969 - 2011 Abstract: The papers of physical organic chemist Marye Anne Fox, documenting her career as a researcher and professor. The collection dates from 1969-2011 and includes reprints, teaching files, subject files, notebooks, and grant proposals. Creator: Fox, Marye Anne, 1947- Scope and Content of Collection The papers of Marye Anne Fox, seventh chancellor of UC San Diego and National Medal of Science laureate, document her career as a researcher and professor of physical organic chemistry. The collection dates from 1969-2011 and is arranged in five series: 1) REPRINTS, 2) TEACHING FILES, 3) SUBJECT FILES, 4) NOTEBOOKS and 5) GRANT PROPOSALS. SERIES 1: REPRINTS The REPRINTS series contains most of Fox's published scientific articles from 1970-1999, arranged chronologically, including collaborative works with other researchers. Her research in the fields of organic photochemistry and electrochemistry has applications in solar energy, semiconductors, functional polymers, and environmental chemistry. SERIES 2: TEACHING FILES The TEACHING FILES series (1969-1993) includes notes, syllabi, problem sets, exam questions and departmental memoranda used by Fox while teaching advanced organic chemistry and photochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Life
    Second Annual John H. Chafee Memorial Lecture on Science and the Environment The Future of Life Dr. Edward O. Wilson Pellegrino University Research Professor, Harvard University December 6, 2001 THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT (NCSE) has been working since 1990 to improve the scientific basis of environmental decisionmaking and has earned an impressive reputa- tion for objectivity, responsibility, and achievement. The Council envisions a society where environmental decisions are based on an accurate understanding of the underlying science, its meaning, and its limitations. In such a society, citizens and decisionmakers receive accurate, understandable, and integrated science-based information. They understand the risks, uncertainties, and potential consequences of their action or inaction. Supported by over 500 academic, scientific, environmental, and business organizations, and federal, state, and local government, NCSE works closely with the many communities creating and using environmental knowledge to make and shape environmental decisions. The Council operates a range of innovative activities in the areas of: Promoting Science for the Environment The Council played an instrumental role in stimulating the National Science Foundation initiative to triple its annual budget for environmental research, education, and scientific assessment. The Council presents expert testimony to Congressional committees, consults regularly with key decisionmakers in government, and works to promote funding for environmental programs at numerous federal agencies. Enhancing Programs at Institutions of Higher Learning NCSE brings members of the academic community together to improve their environmental programs and increase their value to society through the University Affiliate Program, the Council of Environ- mental Deans and Directors, and the Minority Programs Office.
    [Show full text]
  • INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 901 North Stuart Street, Arlington
    INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 901 North Stuart Street, Arlington, VA 22203 Phone, 703-841-3800 Board of Directors: ........ Chairman ........Frank D. Yturria Vice Chairman ........James R. Whelan Directors ........Mark Schneider, Anne Brownell Sloane, Norton Stevens, Paul E. Sussman, Alexander F. Watson, (2 vacancies) Staff: ........ President ........George A. Evans Executive Vice President ........(vacancy) Vice President for Programs ........Linda Borst Vice President for Learning and Dissemination ........Anne Ternes Vice President for Financial Management and Systems ........Winsome Wells, Acting General Counsel ........Adolfo A. Franco The Inter-American Foundation is an independent Federal agency that supports social and economic development in Latin America and the Caribbean. It makes grants primarily to private, indigenous organizations that carry out self-help projects benefiting po or people. The Inter-American Foundation was created by Congress in 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f) to support the self-help efforts of poor people in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Foundation was established because of congressional concern that traditional p rograms of development assistance were not reaching poor people. Instead of working through governments, the Foundation responds directly to the initiatives of the poor by supporting local and private organizations. Approximately 75 percent of the Foundat ion's funds are derived from congressional appropriations and the remainder from the Social Progress Trust Fund of the Inter-American Development Bank. The Foundation is governed by a nine-member Board of Directors appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. By law, six members of the Board are from private organizations and three are from the Government. The Foundation has made 3,642 grants, totaling over $385 million in 36 countries of Latin America and the Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel M. Blake
    Air Daniel M. Blake National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 I A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Operated by Midwest Research Institute I for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC36-83CH10093 NRELr'Tp-430-22197 UC Category 1600 DE97000084 Daniel M. Blake National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Operated by Midwest Research Institute for the U. S . Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC36-83CH10093 Prepared under TaskNo. SI513010 January 1997 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the .United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from: Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available by calling (423)576-8401 Available to the public from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • William E. Mahoney Annual Lecture in Chemistry
    ILLIAM E. MAHONEY OBERT M. MAHONEY Wis a 1955 alumnus of the Department of Chemistry at is President and Chief R the University of Massachusetts, Executive Officer of Belmont Amherst. Professor Mahoney was Savings Bank. Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Mahoney received his M.B.A. Officer, as well as Chairman of the from Columbia Business School Executive Committee of the Board of in 1971. He is a 1970 graduate of Directors, of Witco Corporation (now Chemtura Corporation), a Fortune 500 manufacturer of the University of Massachusetts, specialty chemical and petroleum products. where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry. He received the 1996 After retiring from Witco in 1996, Professor Mahoney diverted Distinguished Alumnus Award from the University of his energies to developing the next generation of leadership Massachusetts, and the 2006 Columbia University in science and industry. Professor Mahoney was a longtime School of Business Leadership Award. He is the recipient adjunct faculty member in the UMass Chemistry Department. of the 2009 Henry L. Shattuck Boston City Champion He taught a highly successful seminar series entitled “The Award and the 2011 USS Constitution Museum’s Charles Business of Science: Contemporary Practices” for several Francis Adams Award for public service. years. Through this seminar series, students were introduced In February 2014, Mahoney was named the “most- to topics in the management of science and technology by speakers from the business management communities. admired CEO of a small or mid-sized company in Professor Mahoney also chaired the Natural Sciences William E. Mahoney Massachusetts” by the Boston Business Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry Enterprise in 2015
    The Chemistry Enterprise in 2015 William F. Carroll, Jr., Occidental Chemical Corp., ACS President 2005 Douglas J. Raber, GreenPoint Science ACKNOWLEDGMENT First, we would like to thank the members of the Senior Analysis. Thanks to those chemists who contributed specific Advisory Group who were interviewed extensively to com- predictions contained in the paper itself. Finally, thanks to all prise the first part of the project, the Situation Analysis. In the ACS members and staff who participated in or facilitated addition, we thank the Governance Advisory Team who dialog and debate; you provided the engine to bring the helped us with the strategy and peer review of the Situation Enterprise Project to completion. Senior Advisory Group Governance Advisory Team Samuel W. Bodman, Alvin L. Kwiram, Michael Betenbaugh, C. Dale Poulter, Deputy Secretary, U.S. University of Washington Johns Hopkins University University of Utah Department of the Treasury Robert S. Langer, Chris Hollinsed, Carolyn Ribes, Ronald Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of DuPont Co. Dow Chemical Co. Columbia University Technology Michael Jaffe, Ron Webb, Donald M. Burland, Jeffrey M. Lipton, New Jersey Institute of Procter & Gamble National Science Foundation Nova Chemicals Technology Marinda Wu, Ralph J. Cicerone, Thomas E. Reilly, Jr., Michael Nevill, Science is Fun! University of California, Irvine American Chemistry Council Solvay America, Inc. Thomas E. D’Ambra, Alfred P. Sattelberger, Albany Molecular Research, Inc. Los Alamos National Laboratory Predictions Peter B. Dervan, Jay Short, California Institute of Technology Diversa Corp. Ronald Breslow, Simon Campbell, Arthur B. Ellis, Jeffrey J. Siirola, Columbia University Royal Society of Chemistry National Science Foundation Eastman Chemical Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2009 Abbott Chemistry Lectures
    George A. Abbott, 1874-1973 Dr. George Alonzo Abbott, Professor Emeritus at the University of North Dakota, had a long and fruitful career of service to the State of North Dakota and the science of Chemistry. He was born July 7, 1874, in Alma, Illinois. Dr. Abbott received both the B.S. and M.A. pro merito from DePauw University. From 1896 until 1904 he taught chemistry in high schools in Evansville, Indiana; Duluth, Minnesota; and Indianapolis, Indiana. In 1903, through a contact with Professor Talbot, he received the Austen Research Fellowship at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Under the guidance of A. A. Noyes, Professor of Physical Chemistry at M.I.T., he received the Ph.D. in 1908. In this first class of doctorates in chemistry were such notables as Edward Washburn, Charles Kraus and Richard Tolman. Dr. Abbott joined the chemistry staff of the North Dakota Agricultural College (North Dakota State University) in 1909. In 1910 he was appointed Professor and Chairman of the Department of Chemistry at the University of North Dakota. His devotion to teaching and the application of chemistry for the betterment of North Dakota was one of his outstanding contributions. His interests in quality water and in natural products such as lignite, for which North Dakota is recognized, gave him national recognition. For half a century he was the only toxicologist in a wide area of the upper midwest. He found time to do a weekly radio program “Science from the Sidelines” which was broadcast for over twenty years. Professor Abbott was a founder and charter member of the North Dakota Academy of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsb-00-123 Approved Minutes Open Session 358 Meeting
    NSB-00-123 APPROVED MINUTES1 OPEN SESSION 358th MEETING NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD The National Science Foundation Arlington, Virginia May 4, 2000 Members Present: Members Absent: Eamon M. Kelly, Chairman Robert M. Solow Diana S. Natalicio, Vice Chair John A. White, Jr. John A. Armstrong Pamela A. Ferguson Mary K. Gaillard Sanford D. Greenberg M.R.C. Greenwood Stanley V. Jaskolski Anita K. Jones George M. Langford Jane Lubchenco Eve L. Menger Joseph A. Miller, Jr. Claudia T. Mitchell-Kernan Robert C. Richardson Vera Rubin Maxine Savitz Luis Sequeira Bob H. Suzuki Richard Tapia Chang-Lin Tien Warren M. Washington Rita R. Colwell, NSF Director 1 The minutes of the Open Session of the 358th meeting were approved at the 359th meeting, August 3, 2000 OS-5-001 The National Science Board (Board) convened in Open Session at 11:35 a.m. on Thursday, May 4, 2000, with Dr. Kelly, Chairman of the Board, presiding (Agenda NSB- 00-67). In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act, this portion of the meeting was open to the public. AGENDA ITEM 3: Presentation by Dr. Michael Turner a. Presentation Dr. Kelly called on Dr. Richardson to introduce the guest speaker. In introducing Dr. Michael Turner, Chairman of the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics and the Bruce V. and Diana M. Rauner Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago, Dr. Richardson commented that recent discoveries in astronomy and astrophysics supported by the National Science Foundation contradict arguments in a currently popular book that the best and most exciting scientific discoveries are past.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program in Pdf Format
    35th Reaction Mechanisms Conference University of California, Davis Davis, CA June 22 – 25, 2014 Welcome ..................................................................................................................2 Program ..................................................................................................................3 RMC Information and Governing Board ............................................................6 Previous Reaction Mechanism Conferences .......................................................7 Sponsors ..................................................................................................................9 UC Davis Campus Map .......................................................................................10 Program at a Glance ............................................................................................11 Speaker Abstracts ................................................................................................12 List of Participants ...............................................................................................29 Index of Poster Presenters...................................................................................35 Poster Abstracts ...................................................................................................36 1 Welcome from the Program Chair It is with great pleasure that I welcome you to the 35th Reaction Mechanisms Conference on the beautiful campus of UC Davis. The RMC, to me, is a special conference that
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Seventh DOE Solar Photochemistry Research Conference
    Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh DOE Solar Photochemistry Research Conference Sponsored by: Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy Held at: Airlie Conference Center Warrenton, Virginia June 6 - 9, 2004 I Cover Graphics The figure on the cover portrays a single wall carbon nanotube (SWNT)-ferrocene (Fc) conjugate as a novel donor-acceptor nanohybrid. Photoexcitation of the SWNT band gap is followed by a rapid intraensemble charge separation, which yields a long-lived charge-separated (SWNT)'- (Fc) ' + state (i.e., lifetime of 1110 i 100 ns). The presence of SWNT'-, detected by laser flash photolysis, has been confirmed by time-resolved pulse radiolysis and steady-state bulk electrolysis. (Dirk Guldi, Notre Dame Radiation Laboratory) I I I I I I IRidge Associated Universities I I This document was produced under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22750DE-AC05-OOOR22750 between the U.S. Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. 3 FOREWORD ~I The 27th Department of Energy Solar Photochemistry Research Conference, sponsored by the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, is being held June 6-9, 2004, at the Airlie Conference Center, in Warrenton, Virginia. These proceedings include the meeting agenda, abstracts of the formal presentations and posters presented at the conference, and an address list for the 85 participants. ~I The Solar Photochemistry Research Conference brings together grantees and contractors of the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division who are engaged in fundamental research on solar photochemical energy conversion. The meeting provides a forum for exchange of new information and ideas, identification of needs and opportunities, and fosters collaboration among investigators.
    [Show full text]
  • J Efferson S Cience F Ellows 2 0
    J e f f e r s o n S c i e n c e F e l l o w s 2 0 0 4 – 2 0 1 7 2017 – 2018 Fellows NANCY D. CONNELL Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Bio - Nancy D. Connell is Professor and Director of Research in the Division of Infectious Disease in the Department of Medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences. A Harvard University PhD in Microbiology, Dr. Connell’s major research focus is antibacterial drug discovery in respiratory pathogens such as M. tuberculosis and B. anthracis; recent work also focuses on the use of predatory bacteria as novel therapeutics for treatment of Gram negative bacterial infections. Dr. Connell has been continuously funded by the NIH, the Department of Defense, industry, and other agencies since 1993. Dr. Connell chairs the Institutional Biosafety Committee of Rutgers University and directs the institution’s biosafety level three containment laboratory. She serves on or has chaired multiple NIH review panels. Dr. Connell has a long-standing interest in the development of regulatory policies associated with biocontainment work and so-called Dual Use Research of Concern. To this end, she has served on a number of committees of the National Academy of Sciences, e.g., the Advances in Technology and the Prevention of their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Agents (2004), Trends in Science and Technology Relevant to the Biological Weapons Convention (2010), and Review [of] the Scientific Approaches used in the FBI's Investigation of the 2001 Bacillus anthracis Mailings (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Visit the National Academies Press Online, the Authoritative Source For
    Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition Steering Committee on Science and Creationism, National Academy of Sciences ISBN: 0-309-53224-8, 48 pages, 8.5 x 11, (1999) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6024.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online, free • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books • Purchase PDFs • Explore with our innovative research tools Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This free book plus thousands more books are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the Web address of the online, full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the National Academies Press. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6024.html Science and Creationism AView from the National Academy of Sciences SECOND EDITION National Academy of Sciences • National Academy of Engineering • Institute of Medicine • National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, DC 1999 Copyright © National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]