Review Article Helicobacter Pylori Infection, Virulence Genes’ Distribution and Accompanying Clinical Outcomes: the West Africa Situation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review Article Helicobacter Pylori Infection, Virulence Genes’ Distribution and Accompanying Clinical Outcomes: the West Africa Situation Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2019, Article ID 7312908, 13 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7312908 Review Article Helicobacter pylori Infection, Virulence Genes’ Distribution and Accompanying Clinical Outcomes: The West Africa Situation Eric Gyamerah Ofori ,1,2 Cynthia Ayefoumi Adinortey ,1 Ansumana Sandy Bockarie,3 Foster Kyei ,1 Emmanuel Ayitey Tagoe,4,5 and Michael Buenor Adinortey 2 1Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana 2Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana 3Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana 4West Africa Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Disease and Pathogens, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 5Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Ghana Correspondence should be addressed to Michael Buenor Adinortey; [email protected] Received 15 May 2019; Revised 18 July 2019; Accepted 20 August 2019; Published 10 December 2019 Academic Editor: Gail B. Mahady Copyright © 2019 Eric Gyamerah Ofori et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and virulence factors in countries across West Africa are scattered. is systematic review seeks to present an update on the status of H. pylori infection focusing on prevalence rate, distribution of virulent genes, and their link to clinical outcomes across countries in the western part of Africa. is information is expected to broaden the knowledge base of clinicians and researchers regarding H. pylori infection and associated virulence factors in West African countries. Search Method. A comprehensive search of the scientic literature in PubMed and ScienceDirect was conducted using the search terms including “Helicobacter pylori infection in West Africa”. Databases were sourced from January 1988 to December 2018. Results. Data on the incidence of H. pylori infection and related pathological factors were found for some countries, whereas others had no information on it. Smoking, alcohol, exposure to high levels of carcinogens and diet were reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal diseases and gastric cancer. Besides the environmental factors and genetic characteristics, there are important characteristics of H. pylori such as the ability to infect, replicate, and persist in a host that have been associated with the pathogenesis of various gastroduodenal diseases. Concluding Remarks. is systematic search has provided information so far available on H. pylori virulence factors and clinical outcomes in West Africa. Accordingly, this piece has identied gaps in the body of knowledge highlighting the need for more studies to clarify the role of H. pylori virulence factors and associated clinical outcomes in the burden of this bacterial infection in West Africa, as data from these countries do not give the needed direct relation. 1. Introduction from H. pylori has also been linked to some other diseases such as iron-deciency anemia [5, 6], immune thrombocyto- Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are common microaerophilic penia (ITP), [5, 7] cardiovascular diseases, [8, 9], hepatobiliary bacteria known to obstinately inhabit the human stomach diseases [10, 11], diabetes mellitus [12], allergies, and asthma mucous layer, aecting about half the world’s population [1–3]. [13] among others. Although Marshall and Warren [14] e pathogen is known to be present in the mucous, on the reported the rst isolation of H. pylori in 1983, isolation of the surface of the stomach lining and its presence causes chronic organism is still not commonly done in West Africa with only inammation, which remains a major cause of prolonged gas- few countries such as Senegal [15] and Ghana [16] having tritis. Also, H. pylori has been identied to increase the risk of recorded their rst successful isolation from gastric biopsy. developing gastric adenocarcinoma [4]. Apart from the gas- ere is no certainty in the mode of transmission for trointestinal tract (GIT) related diseases such as gastroesoph- H. pylori infection; however, various epidemiological studies ageal reux disease, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer, infection have made several claims in this regard. e primary means 2 BioMed Research International of spread of the disease has been linked to transmission from Several factors have been reported to contribute to this vari- one individual to another and usually higher when occurring ation such as, host genetic factors, type of H. pylori virulence within a family [17–19]. e spread from person-to-person factors and sensitivity of the method of detection employed has been identified to be the most likely and could be by [38, 39]. ere is inadequate information on the role of these oral-oral, gastro-oral or fecal-oral [20]. In this regard, the factors in H. pylori infection rates and associated clinical out- practice of good hygiene and improved living conditions comes across the countries in the Western area of Africa which becomes an essential factor in reducing the rate of transmis- makes tackling of the growing disease burden increasingly sion of the infection [21]. Infection occurs in children as well difficult. Assembling data on the type of virulent genes, factors and an infected child maintains a strain, which has a genetic involved in infection and associated clinical outcome is, there- characteristic indistinguishable from that observed in their fore, important [40, 41]. is systematic review hence looks parents [22–24]. ese characteristics remain unchanged at available information in the West African zone on the prev- upon any alteration in the environment in which they are alence of H. pylori infection, virulence factors and their rela- found. tion to clinical outcomes. e prevalence of infection from H. pylori varies geo- graphically with the developing world carrying the higher burden [25]. Infection in peptic ulcer diseases (PUDs) 2. Method of Literature Search patients ranges from almost 25% in countries of the indus- trialized world, and is anticipated to be around 90% in under- A comprehensive search of the scientific literature in PubMed developed countries [26, 27]. e prevalence across countries and ScienceDirect was conducted using the search terms in the West African region is generally high with variations “Helicobacter pylori infection in West Africa”. e search was existing from country to country. e reportedly high prev- repeated with “West Africa” replaced with each of the follow- alence observed in Africa (79.1%) and Asia (54.7%) as com- ing countries; Sierra Leone, Cape Verde, Ghana, Liberia, pared to lower prevalence found in other geographic Benin, Senegal, Sao tome and Principle, Mali, Burkina Faso, locations such as Northern America (37.1%) and Oceania Mauritania, Cote D’ivoire, Guinea Bissau, Niger, Guinea, e (24.4%) [28] have been found not to correlate with the rather Gambia, and Togo. e key words “Helicobacter pylori” was low occurrence of gastric cancer [29, 30]. is situation has replaced with “H. pylori” and the search was repeated. Some been described as the “Asian and African enigmas”. ese other keywords employed were “Helicobacter pylori”, “epide- so-called “enigmas” have been explained by several factors miology”, “prevalence”, and “virulent factors”. e search including host genetic and immune response, different protocol is shown in Figure 1. tumor-inducing potential of explicit strains of H. pylori as e search in PubMed was done with the following acti- well as environmental factors [29, 31]. Again, insufficient vated filters; publication date from 1st January 1988 to 31st African population sampling obtained through endoscopy December 2018, language filter had English and French acti- as well as poor access to health care has also been found to vated and the species selected was Human. Filters activated contribute to this so-called mystery. In this regard, a stronger for the search in ScienceDirect database were the selection of and elaborate data on gastric ulcer in Africans and the prev- the article types; Review articles, Research articles, and alence of associated cancer have established that the low mini-reviews as well as the year range of 1988–2018. Duplicate occurrence is not exactly so [32]. In contrast to the “Asian searches were first removed; aer which the abstracts of arti- enigma”, a report by Irino et al. [33] shows that the incidence cles retrieved were reviewed for relevance before an attempt of gastric cancer (GC) is mainly high in Asian countries, a was made to retrieve the full paper. Selection of articles was situation attributed to the high prevalence in infection from based on the following considerations; (1) Study participants H. pylori. were West Africans. (2) Participants who showed up for endos- It is imperative to mention that an individual that is copy at a gastroenterology unit and diagnosed with H. pylori infected with H. pylori faces a strenuous task of getting rid of infection. (3) Studies investigating virulent factors; Vacuolating the bacterium and hence disease eradication, a situation that cytotoxin (VacA), Cytotoxin-associated gene A (cagA), Outer
Recommended publications
  • Adaptive Clinical Trials: an Introduction
    Adaptive clinical trials: an introduction What are the advantages and disadvantages of adaptive clinical trial designs? How and why were Introduction adaptive clinical Adaptive clinical trial design is trials developed? becoming a hot topic in healthcare research, with some researchers In 2004, the FDA published a report arguing that adaptive trials have the on the problems faced by the potential to get new drugs to market scientific community in developing quicker. In this article, we explain new medical treatments.2 The what adaptive trials are and why they report highlighted that the pace of were developed, and we explore both innovation in biomedical science is the advantages of adaptive designs outstripping the rate of advances and the concerns being raised by in the available technologies and some in the healthcare community. tools for evaluating new treatments. Outdated tools are being used to assess new treatments and there What are adaptive is a critical need to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical trials? clinical trials.2 The current process for developing Adaptive clinical trials enable new treatments is expensive, takes researchers to change an aspect a long time and in some cases, the of a trial design at an interim development process has to be assessment, while controlling stopped after significant amounts the rate of type 1 errors.1 Interim of time and resources have been assessments can help to determine invested.2 In 2006, the FDA published whether a trial design is the most a “Critical Path Opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Experimental Studies in the Fields of Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance, Ten Years Later: a Systematic Review
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Infect Control Manuscript Author Hosp Epidemiol Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 November 12. Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 February ; 39(2): 170–176. doi:10.1017/ice.2017.296. Quasi-experimental Studies in the Fields of Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance, Ten Years Later: A Systematic Review Rotana Alsaggaf, MS, Lyndsay M. O’Hara, PhD, MPH, Kristen A. Stafford, PhD, MPH, Surbhi Leekha, MBBS, MPH, Anthony D. Harris, MD, MPH, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Abstract OBJECTIVE.—A systematic review of quasi-experimental studies in the field of infectious diseases was published in 2005. The aim of this study was to assess improvements in the design and reporting of quasi-experiments 10 years after the initial review. We also aimed to report the statistical methods used to analyze quasi-experimental data. DESIGN.—Systematic review of articles published from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, in 4 major infectious disease journals. METHODS.—Quasi-experimental studies focused on infection control and antibiotic resistance were identified and classified based on 4 criteria: (1) type of quasi-experimental design used, (2) justification of the use of the design, (3) use of correct nomenclature to describe the design, and (4) statistical methods used. RESULTS.—Of 2,600 articles, 173 (7%) featured a quasi-experimental design, compared to 73 of 2,320 articles (3%) in the previous review (P<.01). Moreover, 21 articles (12%) utilized a study design with a control group; 6 (3.5%) justified the use of a quasi-experimental design; and 68 (39%) identified their design using the correct nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prediction Model Performance
    RESEARCH METHODS AND REPORTING A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance Thomas P A Debray,1,2 Johanna A A G Damen,1,2 Kym I E Snell,3 Joie Ensor,3 Lotty Hooft,1,2 Johannes B Reitsma,1,2 Richard D Riley,3 Karel G M Moons1,2 1Cochrane Netherlands, Validation of prediction models is diagnostic test accuracy studies. Compared to therapeu- University Medical Center tic intervention and diagnostic test accuracy studies, Utrecht, PO Box 85500 Str highly recommended and increasingly there is limited guidance on the conduct of systematic 6.131, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands common in the literature. A systematic reviews and meta-analysis of primary prognosis studies. 2Julius Center for Health review of validation studies is therefore A common aim of primary prognostic studies con- Sciences and Primary Care, cerns the development of so-called prognostic predic- University Medical Center helpful, with meta-analysis needed to tion models or indices. These models estimate the Utrecht, PO Box 85500 Str 6.131, 3508 GA Utrecht, summarise the predictive performance individualised probability or risk that a certain condi- Netherlands of the model being validated across tion will occur in the future by combining information 3Research Institute for Primary from multiple prognostic factors from an individual. Care and Health Sciences, Keele different settings and populations. This Unfortunately, there is often conflicting evidence about University, Staffordshire, UK article provides guidance for the predictive performance of developed prognostic Correspondence to: T P A Debray [email protected] researchers systematically reviewing prediction models. For this reason, there is a growing Additional material is published demand for evidence synthesis of (external validation) online only.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Worthwhile Including Observational Studies in Systematic Reviews of Effectiveness?
    CRD_mcdaid05_Poster.qxd 13/6/05 5:12 pm Page 1 Is it worthwhile including observational studies in systematic reviews of effectiveness? The experience from a review of treatments for childhood retinoblastoma Catriona Mc Daid, Suzanne Hartley, Anne-Marie Bagnall, Gill Ritchie, Kate Light, Rob Riemsma Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK Background • Overall there were considerable problems with quality Figure 1: Mapping of included studies (see Table). Without randomised allocation there was a Retinoblastoma is a rare malignant tumour of the retina and high risk of selection bias in all studies. Studies were also usually occurs in children under two years old. It is an susceptible to detection and performance bias, with the aggressive tumour that can lead to loss of vision and, in retrospective studies particularly susceptible as they were extreme cases, death. The prognoses for vision and survival less likely to have a study protocol specifying the have significantly improved with the development of more intervention and outcome assessments. timely diagnosis and improved treatment methods. Important • Due to the considerable limitations of the evidence clinical factors associated with prognosis are age and stage of identified, it was not possible to make meaningful and disease at diagnosis. Patients with the hereditary form of robust conclusions about the relative effectiveness of retinoblastoma may be predisposed to significant long-term different treatment approaches for childhood complications. retinoblastoma. Historically, enucleation was the standard treatment for unilateral retinoblastoma. In bilateral retinoblastoma, the eye ■ ■ ■ with the most advanced tumour was commonly removed and EBRT Chemotherapy EBRT with Chemotherapy the contralateral eye treated with external beam radiotherapy ■ Enucleation ■ Local Treatments (EBRT).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get Started with a Systematic Review in Epidemiology: an Introductory Guide for Early Career Researchers
    Denison et al. Archives of Public Health 2013, 71:21 http://www.archpublichealth.com/content/71/1/21 ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH METHODOLOGY Open Access How to get started with a systematic review in epidemiology: an introductory guide for early career researchers Hayley J Denison1*†, Richard M Dodds1,2†, Georgia Ntani1†, Rachel Cooper3†, Cyrus Cooper1†, Avan Aihie Sayer1,2† and Janis Baird1† Abstract Background: Systematic review is a powerful research tool which aims to identify and synthesize all evidence relevant to a research question. The approach taken is much like that used in a scientific experiment, with high priority given to the transparency and reproducibility of the methods used and to handling all evidence in a consistent manner. Early career researchers may find themselves in a position where they decide to undertake a systematic review, for example it may form part or all of a PhD thesis. Those with no prior experience of systematic review may need considerable support and direction getting started with such a project. Here we set out in simple terms how to get started with a systematic review. Discussion: Advice is given on matters such as developing a review protocol, searching using databases and other methods, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and data synthesis including meta-analysis. Signposts to further information and useful resources are also given. Conclusion: A well-conducted systematic review benefits the scientific field by providing a summary of existing evidence and highlighting unanswered questions. For the individual, undertaking a systematic review is also a great opportunity to improve skills in critical appraisal and in synthesising evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Reporting Meta-Epidemiological Methodology Research
    EBM Primer Evid Based Med: first published as 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713 on 12 July 2017. Downloaded from Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research Mohammad Hassan Murad, Zhen Wang 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713 Abstract The goal is generally broad but often focuses on exam- Published research should be reported to evidence users ining the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect, describing the distribu- Evidence-Based Practice with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal tion of research evidence in a specific setting, exam- Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication Minnesota, USA by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting ining heterogeneity and exploring its causes, identifying are available for several types of studies but not for and describing plausible biases and providing empirical meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta- evidence for hypothesised associations. Unlike classic Correspondence to: epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review epidemiology, the unit of analysis for meta-epidemio- Dr Mohammad Hassan Murad, or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact logical studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes Evidence-based Practice Center, of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street 6–8 observed effect and provide empirical evidence for outcomes. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta- In this guide, we adapt the items used in the PRISMA murad. mohammad@ mayo. edu 9 epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The statement for reporting systematic reviews and outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually meta-analysis to fit the setting of meta- epidemiological not clinical outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Designs in Clinical Trials: Why Use Them, and How to Run and Report Them Philip Pallmann1* , Alun W
    Pallmann et al. BMC Medicine (2018) 16:29 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7 CORRESPONDENCE Open Access Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them Philip Pallmann1* , Alun W. Bedding2, Babak Choodari-Oskooei3, Munyaradzi Dimairo4,LauraFlight5, Lisa V. Hampson1,6, Jane Holmes7, Adrian P. Mander8, Lang’o Odondi7, Matthew R. Sydes3,SofíaS.Villar8, James M. S. Wason8,9, Christopher J. Weir10, Graham M. Wheeler8,11, Christina Yap12 and Thomas Jaki1 Abstract Adaptive designs can make clinical trials more flexible by utilising results accumulating in the trial to modify the trial’s course in accordance with pre-specified rules. Trials with an adaptive design are often more efficient, informative and ethical than trials with a traditional fixed design since they often make better use of resources such as time and money, and might require fewer participants. Adaptive designs can be applied across all phases of clinical research, from early-phase dose escalation to confirmatory trials. The pace of the uptake of adaptive designs in clinical research, however, has remained well behind that of the statistical literature introducing new methods and highlighting their potential advantages. We speculate that one factor contributing to this is that the full range of adaptations available to trial designs, as well as their goals, advantages and limitations, remains unfamiliar to many parts of the clinical community. Additionally, the term adaptive design has been misleadingly used as an all-encompassing label to refer to certain methods that could be deemed controversial or that have been inadequately implemented. We believe that even if the planning and analysis of a trial is undertaken by an expert statistician, it is essential that the investigators understand the implications of using an adaptive design, for example, what the practical challenges are, what can (and cannot) be inferred from the results of such a trial, and how to report and communicate the results.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Quasi-Experimental Study Designs in the Fields of Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance
    INVITED ARTICLE ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE George M. Eliopoulos, Section Editor A Systematic Review of Quasi-Experimental Study Designs in the Fields of Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance Anthony D. Harris,1,2 Ebbing Lautenbach,3,4 and Eli Perencevich1,2 1 2 Division of Health Care Outcomes Research, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Veterans Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/41/1/77/325424 by guest on 24 September 2021 Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland; and 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, and 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We performed a systematic review of articles published during a 2-year period in 4 journals in the field of infectious diseases to determine the extent to which the quasi-experimental study design is used to evaluate infection control and antibiotic resistance. We evaluated studies on the basis of the following criteria: type of quasi-experimental study design used, justification of the use of the design, use of correct nomenclature to describe the design, and recognition of potential limitations of the design. A total of 73 articles featured a quasi-experimental study design. Twelve (16%) were associated with a quasi-exper- imental design involving a control group. Three (4%) provided justification for the use of the quasi-experimental study design. Sixteen (22%) used correct nomenclature to describe the study. Seventeen (23%) mentioned at least 1 of the potential limitations of the use of a quasi-experimental study design.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Epidemiology Based on Current Evidence
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Epidemiology Based on Current Evidence Minah Park, Alex R. Cook *, Jue Tao Lim , Yinxiaohe Sun and Borame L. Dickens Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National Health Systems, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore; [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (J.T.L.); [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (B.L.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +65-8569-9949 Received: 18 March 2020; Accepted: 27 March 2020; Published: 31 March 2020 Abstract: As the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread rapidly across the globe, we aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence on epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and the effectiveness of control measures to inform policymakers and leaders in formulating management guidelines, and to provide directions for future research. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and preprints on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak following predefined eligibility criteria. Of 317 research articles generated from our initial search on PubMed and preprint archives on 21 February 2020, 41 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Current evidence suggests that it takes about 3-7 days for the epidemic to double in size. Of 21 estimates for the basic reproduction number ranging from 1.9 to 6.5, 13 were between 2.0 and 3.0. The incubation period was estimated to be 4-6 days, whereas the serial interval was estimated to be 4-8 days. Though the true case fatality risk is yet unknown, current model-based estimates ranged from 0.3% to 1.4% for outside China.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Quasi
    Open access Protocol BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258 on 9 September 2020. Downloaded from Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta- analysis of quasi- experimental evidence Lucy Karwatowska ,1 Simon Russell,1 Francesca Solmi ,2 Bianca Lucia De Stavola,1 Sara Jaffee,3 Jean- Baptiste Pingault,4,5 Essi Viding4 To cite: Karwatowska L, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Russell S, Solmi F, et al. Introduction Disruptive behaviour disorders, including Risk factors for disruptive oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a behaviours: protocol for a ► The strengths of the current study include systemat- common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, systematic review and meta- ically evaluating quasi- experimental research, which analysis of quasi- experimental with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any aims to estimate causal effects, of a wide range of evidence. BMJ Open disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and risk factors for a variety of disruptive behaviours. 2020;10:e038258. doi:10.1136/ conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic ► The risk factors will not be selected a priori allowing bmjopen-2020-038258 and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours any risk factor to be included in the review and the and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in ► Prepublication history and quality of evidence will be assessed to provide con- additional material for this recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an fidence in the effect estimates. paper are available online. To escalating major public health concern and it is important ► The present study will be the first to synthesise view these files, please visit to understand what factors may influence the risk of these quasi- experimental evidence for disruptive be- the journal online (http:// dx.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials on Physical Interventions for Lateral Epicondylalgia
    411 REVIEW A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia L Bisset, A Paungmali, B Vicenzino, E Beller ............................................................................................................................... Br J Sports Med 2005;39:411–422. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170 A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of to May 1999), and non-steroidal anti-inflamma- tory drugs (NSAIDs; databases searched to June physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia (tennis 2001).11–14 Another systematic review (databases elbow) was carried out. Seventy six randomised controlled searched to June 2002) within the Cochrane trials were identified, 28 of which satisfied the minimum Library has looked at the effectiveness of transverse friction massage on general tendino- criteria for meta-analysis. The evidence suggests that pathy conditions.15 The prevailing conclusion extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not beneficial in the drawn by many of these reviews was that of treatment of tennis elbow. There is a lack of evidence for insufficient evidence to support any one treat- ment over another, predominantly because of the the long term benefit of physical interventions in general. low statistical power, inadequate internal validity, However, further research with long term follow up into and insufficient data reported in most of the trials. manipulation and exercise as treatments is indicated. Before the systematic review of Smidt et al,10 there was
    [Show full text]
  • Has a Systematic Review Been Done on Your Topic?
    U T S CHOOL OF P UBLIC H EALTH L IBRARY Has a Systematic Review Been Done on Your Topic? Before you begin the process of developing a systematic review, you need to determine if a systematic review been done on your topic. Is it identical to your proposed topic? How current is it? The number of completed SRs has increased dramatically over the past few years so don’t be discouraged as you begin searching the literature for prior SRs. You may very well find a systematic review that is similar to yours, but your focus might include a different aspect of the topic. The prior SR may have included only clinical trials and you intend to review case-control studies or it may have included subjects over 50 but you want to look at populations younger than 30. Another key consideration is the currency of prior SRs you find as even those that are only a few years old can be out of date. In some cases, an SR can be out of date in only a year, especially if a new treatment or diagnostic method for a disease or condition has come into use. Therefore, even if you find SRs on your topic, be sure to look at them to make certain your topic really isn’t taken. If your topic is taken, look at their conclusions. What do they feel is missing from their review? What are their recommendations for follow-up reviews? Is it something that you can do? For this handbook, the starting topic will be: How can patient compliance for treatment of latent tuberculosis be improved? Inclusion criteria include: English language, and multiple research methodologies including clinical trials, evaluation studies, pre-post design, and case-control studies.
    [Show full text]