<<

book reviews

Science in culture

A year in Pangaea Walking With , a BBC Television series BBC (first UK episode, 4 October) Henry Gee Makers of films about dinosaurs march in the footsteps of giants. There can be few who cannot remember watching, as awe-struck children, the doom-laden dinosaurs in Walt Disney’s Fantasia, marching across the desert to the strains of Igor Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring. Then came , ’s film (based on ’s novel) in which the latest technology brought dinosaurs startlingly to life. Jurassic Park, said the publicists, was a film “65 million years in the making”. The BBC’s new series makes greater claims for itself. “Forget Jurassic Park,” trumpets the hype. Walking With Dinosaurs is “the biggest thing on various creatures over the course of what might on the BBC, so it must be true. television in 200 million years”. be called A Year in Pangaea, weaving — in the But more ominous problems loom. In the In a series of six, half-hour episodes, Walking cause of reanimation — known fact with various cause of narrative, the programme discusses the With Dinosaurs gives us snapshots of life from degrees of speculation. evolutionary fates of creatures in very old- the (220 million years ago) to the end of In the first episode, for example, we meet a fashioned terms, talking of “the day of the the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago). breeding pair of -like living dinosaurs” and “missing links” as if evolution Each episode follows, quite deliberately, the in a burrow (for which evidence exists), laying were nothing more than a scala naturae format of a standard wildlife documentary. eggs (a reasonable inference), suckling their animated by natural selection. This way of As a genre, such documentaries are young (rather more speculative) and pair- thinking of evolution — as the working out of remarkably formulaic. They are usually called A bonding for life (ditto). A baby is eaten preordained fate — was on its last legs in the Year in ... [insert exotic locale of your choice], by a marauding (a predatory 1920s and completely abolished by the advent of and start with a bloated, blood-red sunrise. They ) and the cynodont couple, looking like phylogenetic systematics in the 1960s and . plot the lives of over the course of a year demented, mutilated badgers, waddle Why, when palaeontology has come so far, do and contain lines such as ‘The herd of [insert disconsolately off (stage left) to make a new programme-makers still peddle concepts as herbivore name here] is nervous as a lone home. antique as alchemy? [append carnivore name of choice] approaches. As a wildlife ‘docu-soap’, it all works Leaving these problems aside, the script is so The [carnivore] is desperately hungry. She hasn’t beautifully. What is worrying, though, is the relentlessly monotonous that even the eaten since last Tuesday fortnight and this is her mixture of fact and speculation melded into a prodigious skills of the narrator — the actor last chance to feed her cubs/pups/chicks/kittens seamless whole: this is fine for drama or science — cannot animate it. (delete as applicable) before the dry season. If she fiction, but I question whether it is entirely Everything in the world is seen as doesn’t get a meal now, her [offspring name] will proper for something billed as a science doom-laden: an must be constantly die — victims of the ceaseless, merciless Struggle programme. This is where comparisons with vigilant in case something bigger threatens to for Existence.” The credits roll over a bloated, Jurassic Park become rather awkward. bite its head off. A sequence in which a small blood-red sunset. In Jurassic Park, for example, the predator takes a bath in a puddle could have Judged from the first episode, at least, has bright warning coloration and been an excuse for some lightness in the gloom, Walking With the ability to spit venom. We could not possibly but no: we are told that the benighted creature Dinosaurs know or infer, from the fossil remains, takes a terrible risk and doesn’t know the grim

BBC follows this that Dilophosaurus has any such end that fate has in store for it. This depressing tradition, attributes: but this is an example of message of doom, doom and more doom is charting the precisely the point that Jurassic emphasized by a score that sounds like one long, lives of Park is trying to make. That is, if half-remembered excerpt from Gustav Holst’s people insist on tampering with Mars, Bringer of War. , such as by recreating Which brings us back to Fantasia. Truly, a dinosaurs from ancient DNA, programme on dinosaurs, even one as ambitious they will be forced to contend as this, cannot escape its influences. A sequence with a variety of unguessable in the first episode has a herd of Placerias consequences. (looking like mobile sofas with teeth) trudging Things are different for a across the desert — a scene guaranteed to bring wildlife documentary, in Fantasia to mind. The genius of the Mouse which viewers should have the (aided, in this case, by Leopold Stokowski) was to right to expect that everything is true; or, if it think of a Stravinsky . In Walking isn’t, they should be able to tell fact from With Dinosaurs, we have to put up with imitation fiction. This is not the case for Walking with upHolstery. Walking With Dinosaurs will be a hit, Dinosaurs: what will parents and teachers but as Noël Coward once said, one can only do when inquiring 12-year-olds insist marvel at the potency of cheap music. I that cynodonts suckled their young? It was Henry Gee is a senior editor at Nature.

530 © 1999 Macmillan Magazines Ltd NATURE | VOL 401 | 7 OCTOBER 1999 | www.nature.com