To Academy Oral Histories Marvin J. Levy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Beyond Westworld
“We Don’t Know Exactly How They Work”: Making Sense of Technophobia in 1973 Westworld, Futureworld, and Beyond Westworld Stefano Bigliardi Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane - Morocco Abstract This article scrutinizes Michael Crichton’s movie Westworld (1973), its sequel Futureworld (1976), and the spin-off series Beyond Westworld (1980), as well as the critical literature that deals with them. I examine whether Crichton’s movie, its sequel, and the 1980s series contain and convey a consistent technophobic message according to the definition of “technophobia” advanced in Daniel Dinello’s 2005 monograph. I advance a proposal to develop further the concept of technophobia in order to offer a more satisfactory and unified interpretation of the narratives at stake. I connect technophobia and what I call de-theologized, epistemic hubris: the conclusion is that fearing technology is philosophically meaningful if one realizes that the limitations of technology are the consequence of its creation and usage on behalf of epistemically limited humanity (or artificial minds). Keywords: Westworld, Futureworld, Beyond Westworld, Michael Crichton, androids, technology, technophobia, Daniel Dinello, hubris. 1. Introduction The 2016 and 2018 HBO series Westworld by Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy has spawned renewed interest in the 1973 movie with the same title by Michael Crichton (1942-2008), its 1976 sequel Futureworld by Richard T. Heffron (1930-2007), and the short-lived 1980 MGM TV series Beyond Westworld. The movies and the series deal with androids used for recreational purposes and raise questions about technology and its risks. I aim at an as-yet unattempted comparative analysis taking the narratives at stake as technophobic tales: each one conveys a feeling of threat and fear related to technological beings and environments. -
Las Aportaciones Al Cine De Steven Spielberg Son Múltiples, Pero Sobresale Como Director Y Como Productor
Steven Spielberg Las aportaciones al cine de Steven Spielberg son múltiples, pero sobresale como director y como productor. La labor de un productor de cine puede conllevar cierto control sobre las diversas atribuciones de una película, pero a menudo es poco más que aportar el dinero y los medios que la hacen posible sin entrar mucho en los aspectos creativos de la misma como el guión o la dirección. Es por este motivo que no me voy a detener en la tarea de Spielberg como productor más allá de señalar sus dos productoras de cine y algunas de sus producciones o coproducciones a modo de ejemplo, para complementar el vistazo a la enorme influencia de Spielberg en el mundo cinematográfico: En 1981 creó la productora de cine “Amblin Entertainment” junto con Kathleen Kenndy y Frank Marshall. El logo de esta productora pasaría a ser la famosa silueta de la bicicleta con luna llena de fondo de “ET”, la primera producción de la firma dirigida por Spielberg. Otras películas destacadas con participación de esta productora y no dirigidas por Spielberg son “Gremlins”, “Los Goonies”, “Regreso al futuro”, “Esta casa es una ruina”, “Fievel y el nuevo mundo”, “¿Quién engañó a Roger Rabbit?”, “En busca del Valle Encantado”, “Los picapiedra”, “Casper”, “Men in balck”, “Banderas de nuestros padres” & “Cartas desde Iwo Jima” o las series de televisión “Cuentos asombrosos” y “Urgencias” entre muchas otras películas y series. En 1994 fundaría con Jeffrey Katzenberg y David Geffen la productora y distribuidora DreamWorks, que venderían al estudio Viacom en 2006 tras participar en éxitos como “Shrek”, “American Beauty”, “Náufrago”, “Gladiator” o “Una mente maravillosa”. -
Grammar & Reading Section
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRANCE EXAMINATION 2021 SCHOOL YEAR KANSAI GRAMMAR & READING SECTION Student Name: ______________________________________________ Applicant Number: ______________________________________________ 1 CONTENTS This booklet contains the following sections: Section 1 Error identification 15 Questions Section 2 Choosing the appropriate words 15 Questions Choosing the best response to the Section 3 10 Questions 40 minutes prompt Reading A 5 Questions Reading Comprehension Reading B 5 Questions If anything is missing, please inform the examiner immediately. 2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3 Section 1: Error identification INSTRUCTIONS Find the mistakes in the following sentences. If there is no mistake, choose option d), (no mistake). Only ONE answer will be accepted. If two or more answers are chosen for a question, ZERO points will be given for that question. e.g. ‘Everyone knows that Osaka is more smaller than Tokyo.’ a) Everyone knows b) more smaller c) than Tokyo d) no mistake The answer is b (more smaller). Mark your answer on the sheet provided as indicated below (on the left). Section 1 Section 1 1. (a) (b) (c) (d) 1. (a) (b) (c) (d) THE CORRECT WAY THE INCORRECT WAY FULL points ZERO points If you have a problem, please ask for help. 4 1) What part of Japan is your family from? a) What part b) is c) family from d) no mistake 2) I’m not use to speaking so much English at school. a) use to b) so much c) at school d) no mistake 3) I’m sorry for being lately to class. a) for b) lately c) to d) no mistake 4) Could you speak more slow please? a) Could b) speak c) slow d) no mistake 5) You haven’t seen this movie before, did you? a) haven’t b) before c) did you d) no mistake 5 Section 1: Error identification 6) Your not going home after school, are you? a) Your b) going home after c) are you d) no mistake 7) I think geography class is more harder than history class. -
RAPPORTO Il Mercato E L’Industria Del Cinema in Italia 2008
RAPPORTO Il Mercato e l’Industria del Cinema in Italia 2008 fondazione ente dello spettacolo RAPPORTO Il Mercato e l’Industria del Cinema in Italia 2008 In collaborazione con CINECITTA’ LUCE S.p.A. Con il sostegno di Editing e grafica: PRC srl - Roma fondazione ente Realizzazione a cura di: Area Studi Ente dello Spettacolo Consulenza: Redento Mori dello spettacolo Presentazione el panorama della pubblicistica italiana sul cinema, è mancata fino ad oggi una sintesi che consentisse una visione organica del settore e tale da misurare il peso di una realtà produttiva che per qualità e quantità rappresenta una delle voci più significative Ndell’intera economia. Il Rapporto 2008 su “Il Mercato e l’Industria del Cinema in Italia” ha lo scopo primario di colmare questa lacuna e di offrire agli operatori e agli analisti un quadro più ampio possibile di un universo che attraversa la cultura e la società del nostro Paese. Il Rapporto è stato realizzato con questo spirito dalla Fondazione Ente dello Spettacolo in collaborazione con Cinecittà Luce S.p.A., ed è il frutto della ricerca condotta da un’équipe di studiosi sulla base di una pluralità di fonti e di dati statistici rigorosi. Questo rigore si è misurato in alcuni casi con la relativa indeterminatezza di informazioni provocata dall’assenza di dati attualizzati (ad esempio, per i bilanci societari) e dalla fluidità di notizie in merito a soggetti che operano nel settore secondo una logica a volte occasionale e temporanea. La Fondazione Ente dello Spettacolo opera dal 1946. Finora si è conosciuto molto del cinema italiano soprattutto in termini di È una realtà articolata e multimediale, impegnata nella diffusione, promozione consumo. -
Cablelabs Studio Code List 05/01/2006
CableLabs Studio Code List 05/01/2006 Studio Name Code Last Update 05/05/2006 1 120 Degree Films 120D 2 1st National FSN 3 2 Silks Releasing 2SR 4 20th Century Fox FOX 5 21st Century 21ST 6 2nd Generation 2GN 7 4th & Broadway 4TH 8 50th Street 50TH 9 7th Planet Prods 7PP 10 8X Entertainment 8X 11 A.D.G. ADG 12 A.I.P. Studios AIPS 13 Abramorama Entertainment ABR 14 Academy ACD 15 Access Motion Picture Group ACM 16 ADV Films ADV 17 AFD Theatrical AFDT 18 Alive ALV 19 Alliance Atlantis Communications AA 20 Alliance International Pictures AIP 21 Almi ALM 22 American International Pictures AINT 23 American Vacation Production AVP 24 American World Pictures AWP 25 American Zoetrope AZO 26 Amoon AMO 27 Andora Pictures AND 28 Angelika ANG 29 A-Pix APIX 30 Apollo APO 31 Apple and Honey Film Corp. AHFC 32 Arab Films ARAB 33 Arcangelo Entertainment ARC 34 Arenaplex ARN 35 Arenas Entertainment ARNS 36 Aries ARI 37 Ariztical Entertainment ARIZ 38 Arrival Pictures ARR 39 Arrow Releasing ARW 40 Arthouse Films AHF 41 Artificial Eye ARTI 42 Artisan ARTS 43 Artist View Ent. ARV 44 Artistic License ARTL 45 Artists Releasing Corp ARP 46 ArtMattan Productions AMP 47 Artrution Productions ART 48 ASA Communications ASA 49 Ascot ASC 50 Associated Film Distribution AFD 51 Astor Pictures AST 1 CableLabs Studio Code List 05/01/2006 Studio Name Code Last Update 05/05/2006 52 Astral Films ASRL 53 At An Angle ANGL 54 Atlantic ATL 55 Atopia ATP 56 Attitude Films ATT 57 Avalanche Films AVF 58 Avatar Films AVA 59 Avco Embassy AEM 60 Avenue AVE 61 B&W Prods. -
Elizabeth Taylor: Screen Goddess
PRESS RELEASE: June 2011 11/5 Elizabeth Taylor: Screen Goddess BFI Southbank Salutes the Hollywood Legend On 23 March 2011 Hollywood – and the world – lost a living legend when Dame Elizabeth Taylor died. As a tribute to her BFI Southbank presents a season of some of her finest films, this August, including Giant (1956), Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966). Throughout her career she won two Academy Awards and was nominated for a further three, and, beauty aside, was known for her humanitarian work and fearless social activism. Elizabeth Taylor was born in Hampstead, London, on 27 February 1932 to affluent American parents, and moved to the US just months before the outbreak of WWII. Retired stage actress Sara Southern doggedly promoted her daughter’s career as a child star, culminating in the hit National Velvet (1944), when she was just 12, and was instrumental in the reluctant teenager’s successful transition to adult roles. Her first big success in an adult role came with Vincente Minnelli’s Father of the Bride (1950), before her burgeoning sexuality was recognised and she was cast as a wealthy young seductress in A Place in the Sun (1951) – her first on-screen partnership with Montgomery Clift (a friend to whom Taylor remained fiercely loyal until Clift’s death in 1966). Together they were hailed as the most beautiful movie couple in Hollywood history. The oil-epic Giant (1956) came next, followed by Raintree County (1958), which earned the actress her first Oscar nomination and saw Taylor reunited with Clift, though it was during the filming that he was in the infamous car crash that would leave him physically and mentally scarred. -
Paramount Pictures and Dreamworks Pictures' "GHOST in the SHELL" Is in Production in New Zealand
April 14, 2016 Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures' "GHOST IN THE SHELL" is in Production in New Zealand HOLLYWOOD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures have announced that production is underway on "GHOST IN THE SHELL," starring Scarlett Johansson ("AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON," "LUCY") and directed by Rupert Sanders ("SNOW WHITE AND THE HUNTSMAN"). The film is shooting in Wellington, New Zealand. This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160414005815/en/ Paramount Pictures will release the film in the U.S. on March 31, 2017. The film, which is based on the famous Kodansha Comics manga series of the same name, written and illustrated by Masamune Shirow, is produced by Avi Arad ("THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 1 & 2," "IRON MAN"), Ari Arad ("GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE"), and Steven Paul ("GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE"). Michael Costigan ("PROMETHEUS"), Tetsu Fujimura ("TEKKEN"), Mitsuhisa Ishikawa, whose animation studio Production I.G produced the Japanese "GHOST IN THE SHELL" film and television series, and Jeffrey Silver ("EDGE OF TOMORROW," "300") will executive produce. Scarlett Johansson plays the Major in Ghost in the Shell from Paramount Pictures Based on the internationally-acclaimed sci-fi and DreamWorks Pictures in Theaters March 31, 2017. (Photo: Business Wire) property, "GHOST IN THE SHELL" follows the Major, a special ops, one-of-a-kind human-cyborg hybrid, who leads the elite task force Section 9. Devoted to stopping the most dangerous criminals and extremists, Section 9 is faced with an enemy whose singular goal is to wipe out Hanka Robotic's advancements in cyber technology. -
Media Release Dreamworks Studios, Participant Media
MEDIA RELEASE DREAMWORKS STUDIOS, PARTICIPANT MEDIA, RELIANCE ENTERTAINMENT AND ENTERTAINMENT ONE FORM AMBLIN PARTNERS, A NEW FILM, TELEVISION AND DIGITAL CONTENT CREATION COMPANY Steven Spielberg Also an Investor in Amblin Partners Mumbai, December 17, 2015: Steven Spielberg, Principal Partner, DreamWorks Studios, Jeff Skoll, Chairman, Participant Media, Anil Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Group and Darren Throop, President and Chief Executive Officer, Entertainment One (eOne) announced today the formation of Amblin Partners, a new film, television and digital content creation company. The new company will create content using the Amblin, DreamWorks Pictures and Participant brands and leverage their power and broad awareness to tell stories that appeal to a wide range of audiences. Participant Media will remain a separate company that continues to independently develop, produce and finance projects with socially relevant themes. Amblin Partners will be led by CEO Michael Wright and President and COO Jeff Small. In addition, Amblin Television will become a division of Amblin Partners and continues to be run by co- presidents Justin Falvey and Darryl Frank, who maintain their longtime leadership roles. They join Producer Kristie Macosko Krieger and President of Production Holly Bario on the film side, to complete Amblin Partners’ senior management team. David Linde, Chief Executive Officer of Participant Media, and Participant’s narrative feature team, led by Executive Vice President Jonathan King, will work closely with Amblin Partners to develop and produce specific content for the new venture in addition to exploring opportunities for co-productions and other content. In making the announcement about Amblin Partners, Mr. Spielberg said, “We are thrilled to partner with Jeff Skoll, Participant Media, and to continue our prolific relationship. -
Coming Soon Now Open
NOW OPEN COMING SOON HARRY POTTER, characters, names and related indicia are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Harry Potter Publishing Rights © JKR. (s14) TRANSFORMERS and its logo and all related characters are trademarks of Hasbro and are used with permission. © 2014 Hasbro. All Rights Reserved. © 2014 DreamWorks L.L.C. and Paramount Pictures Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Jurassic Park, Jurassic Park River Adventure, Camp Jurassic ® Universal Studios/Amblin. Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends TM & © Ward Prods. All Popeye characters TM & © 2014 KFS, Inc. TM Hearst Holdings, Inc. © MARVEL. Dr. Seuss properties TM & © 2014 Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. All rights reserved. © 2014 BMP. Jimmy Buffett’s ® Margaritaville ® Jimmy Buffett. Pat O’Brien’s, Hurricane Glass logo, Have Fun! and Iron Grill Design ® Pat O’Brien’s Bar, Inc. © 2014 Pat O’Brien’s Bar, Inc. All rights reserved. Emeril’s ® Emeril Lagasse. Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. TM & © 2014 Par. Pic. Hot Dog Hall of Fame is a registered trademark of Creative Attractions, LLC. The Cowfish and all related logos TM The Cowfish Sushi Burger Bar, LLC. All rights reserved. Hollywood Drive-In Golf and associated logos are trademarks of Adventure Golf Design & Development, Inc. ©2014 AMC. Shrek 4-D © 2014 DreamWorks Animation L.L.C. T2, TERMINATOR ® StudioCanal S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2014 Lyons Partnership, L.P. The Barney name and character, related characters and the overlapping dino spots and Barney and star logos are trademarks of Lyons Partnership, L.P. Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off. and other countries. THE SIMPSONS RIDE TM Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. -
The Creative Process
The Creative Process THE SEARCH FOR AN AUDIO-VISUAL LANGUAGE AND STRUCTURE SECOND EDITION by John Howard Lawson Preface by Jay Leyda dol HILL AND WANG • NEW YORK www.johnhowardlawson.com Copyright © 1964, 1967 by John Howard Lawson All rights reserved Library of Congress catalog card number: 67-26852 Manufactured in the United States of America First edition September 1964 Second edition November 1967 www.johnhowardlawson.com To the Association of Film Makers of the U.S.S.R. and all its members, whose proud traditions and present achievements have been an inspiration in the preparation of this book www.johnhowardlawson.com Preface The masters of cinema moved at a leisurely pace, enjoyed giving generalized instruction, and loved to abandon themselves to reminis cence. They made it clear that they possessed certain magical secrets of their profession, but they mentioned them evasively. Now and then they made lofty artistic pronouncements, but they showed a more sincere interest in anecdotes about scenarios that were written on a cuff during a gay supper.... This might well be a description of Hollywood during any period of its cultivated silence on the matter of film-making. Actually, it is Leningrad in 1924, described by Grigori Kozintsev in his memoirs.1 It is so seldom that we are allowed to study the disclosures of a Hollywood film-maker about his medium that I cannot recall the last instance that preceded John Howard Lawson's book. There is no dearth of books about Hollywood, but when did any other book come from there that takes such articulate pride in the art that is-or was-made there? I have never understood exactly why the makers of American films felt it necessary to hide their methods and aims under blankets of coyness and anecdotes, the one as impenetrable as the other. -
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK AN INTERVIEW WITH ARNOLD SPIELBERG FOR THE RUTGERS ORAL HISTORY ARCHIVES WORLD WAR II * KOREAN WAR * VIETNAM WAR * COLD WAR INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY SANDRA STEWART HOLYOAK and SHAUN ILLINGWORTH NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY MAY 12, 2006 TRANSCRIPT BY DOMINGO DUARTE Shaun Illingworth: This begins an interview with Mr. Arnold Spielberg on May 12, 2006, in New Brunswick, New Jersey, with Shaun Illingworth and … Sandra Stewart Holyoak: Sandra Stewart Holyoak. SI: Thank you very much for sitting for this interview today. Arnold Spielberg: My pleasure. SI: To begin, could you tell us where and when you were born? AS: I was born February 6, 1917, in Cincinnati, Ohio. SH: Could you tell us a little bit about your father and how his family came to settle in Cincinnati, Ohio? AS: Okay. My father was an orphan, born in the Ukraine, in a little town called Kamenets- Podolski, in the Ukraine. … His parents died, I don’t know of what, when he was about two years old and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle’s name was Avrahom and his father’s name was Meyer Pesach, and so, I became Meyer Pesach Avrahom. So, I was named after both his uncle and his father, okay, and my father came to this country after serving six years in the Russian Army as a conscript. That is usually what happens to people. … Also, when he was raised on his uncle’s farm, he rode horses and punched cattle. So, he was sort of a Russian cowboy. -
The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960S
The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960s By Zachary Saltz University of Kansas, Copyright 2011 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Film and Media Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. John Tibbetts ________________________________ Dr. Michael Baskett ________________________________ Dr. Chuck Berg Date Defended: 19 April 2011 ii The Thesis Committee for Zachary Saltz certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960s ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. John Tibbetts Date approved: 19 April 2011 iii ABSTRACT The Green Sheet was a bulletin created by the Film Estimate Board of National Organizations, and featured the composite movie ratings of its ten member organizations, largely Protestant and represented by women. Between 1933 and 1969, the Green Sheet was offered as a service to civic, educational, and religious centers informing patrons which motion pictures contained potentially offensive and prurient content for younger viewers and families. When the Motion Picture Association of America began underwriting its costs of publication, the Green Sheet was used as a bartering device by the film industry to root out municipal censorship boards and legislative bills mandating state classification measures. The Green Sheet underscored tensions between film industry executives such as Eric Johnston and Jack Valenti, movie theater owners, politicians, and patrons demanding more integrity in monitoring changing film content in the rapidly progressive era of the 1960s. Using a system of symbolic advisory ratings, the Green Sheet set an early precedent for the age-based types of ratings the motion picture industry would adopt in its own rating system of 1968.