Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 byguest on 26 September 2021
ABSTRACT may have derived from 1). (Fig. problem cat,” which became synonymous with an illegal solution to a a cat” comes the expression expression the comes cat” a “like pole a climbing by cables electrical installing illegally of practice the From [11]. lights attached with wire tension (1881), Originally Gambiarra contexts. andglobal local examine we first, but ments, application of of the musical instrument. Later in this article, we look at the and materiality, each of these terms suggests a reenvisioning marking [10]. By reinforcing the connections between sound technografic and [9] residualism [8], technology opera [7], media cracked [6], electronics dirty [5], hacking hardware [4], bending circuit design, sound instrumentit-yourself ”), ( DIY as such trends, and practices diverse includes it visual arts to music [2] to sound art to media activism [3] and art encapsulatesThe Brazil[1]. in term scene productionsfrom local the within institutions and/or technology vices, de materials, with working of method improvisational an The expression . instruments, orgambioluthiery at theuseofgambiarrainproductionmusicandsoundart gambiarra, includingitsglobalandlocalcontexts,thenlooks firstanalyzesthegenealogyofword discourse. Thisarticle 21st century, ofBrazilianart gambiarrahasbeenapart theterm ofthe needed toolsorresourcesarenotavailable.Sincetheturn problemwhen wayofsolvinganeveryday improvised andinformal Gambiarra isapopularBrazilianexpressionthatdescribesan Gambioluthiery ©2017 ISAST with thisissue. See
“ do- - - approach to problemsinvolvingapproachinventiveness,to intelligence, tively, it may describe any of the following: an unconventionalDIY.to orpatchwork, handyman, totricks, a to Alternato- repair,mend,adapt, improvise referorassemble; italso can cape, or flee” [12]. expression the from (Photo ©J.P. Oliveira) Fig. 1. Popularly,word the Illegal electricityextensionsonapole,also calledgambiarra. LEONARDO MUSICJOURNAL, Vol. 27, pp. 87–92,2017 , meaning “to run, es- run, “tomeaning gâmbias , às darn gambiarra fix, fit, tovariously means 87 creativity and the ability to come up with extemporaneous dystopias. This paradoxical gap between the advances and solutions to problems; an uncommon, unusual practice; ver- limitations of techno-consumption is described by cyber- nacular, autochthonous, popular art; the act of taking advan- punk writer William Gibson in terms of high technology tage of a situation; or an irregular, illicit, dishonest, marginal, and precarious life, “high tech and low life” [17]; likewise, illegal or fraudulent custom. Gambiarra is scruffy, precari- Nam June Paik regards anti-technological technology as an ous, rustic, rough, crude, ephemeral, palliative, volatile, in- “electronic humanization” [18] or even a search for the pri- formal, inadequate, imperfect or unfinished [13]. mordial music (Fig. 2). This broad spectrum of meanings makesgambiarra a flex- ible and adaptable term across various contexts and involv- ing diverse ways of working with objects and technologies. Gambiarra twists industrial design logic, establishing short circuits between a product’s form and its functionality. In principle, it emerges from an existing design, but, depend- ing on the degree of interference, it can also result in a new design object.
Global Context Gambiarra is related in meaning to some English words that are used in the context of improvisation, adaptation, creative problem-solving and autonomy, such as hacking, kludging, jury-rigging, workarounds, do-it-yourself and makeshift. Like bricolage, as described by Claude Lévi-Strauss, the idea of gambiarra arises from the logic that “something can al- ways be used for something,” thereby privileging collected or found elements and eschewing preconceived plans [14]. Fig. 2. Nam June Paik, Urmusik, 1961, wooden box, wire, various materials, can, 1961. (© Estate of Nam June Paik) Urmusik is a German term meaning Diverging far from the processes and norms adopted by “in- “ancestral or primordial music.” strumental technical thought,” the bricoleur uses fragmented or prefabricated materials to carry out projects. Neither low nor high technology, gambiarra is closer to Gambiarra is also close in meaning to several other popu- being a “technology without extremes” that combines archaic lar global expressions. Revolico and rikimbili in Cuba refer techniques with modern machines [19]. Beyond identifying to “technological disobedience,” or resistance to the scar- creativity and invention as ways to overcome restrictive con- city of material resources and technological access [15]; in ditions, gambiarra subverts polarized logic and discourse. It Mexico rasquache designates art that reflects the ghetto at- sits in between and on the edge. Marginal and anti-nostalgic, titude rasquachismo, an artistic movement working within it gravitates toward analog technologies or optimistic ap- technical and material limitations [16]; in Uruguay, chapuza, proaches to new technological and/or digital currents. arreglo temporal (“temporary arrangement”) and lo atamos Despite its similarities with other global terms, gambiarra con alambre (“tie with wire”) represent quick and careless carries distinct local characteristics. It is relevant within execution; solución parche in Chile means a kind of amend- Brazilian artistic movements such as the 1920s modernist ment or temporary solution; in Colombia arreglo hechizo or anthropophagic movement [20] and tropicalism in the late reparación hechiza have connotations similar to gambiarra; 1960s [21]. Cultural icons of local culture commonly related desenrascar in Portugal is a creative, unorthodox process to the gambiarra approach include jeitinho, malandragem that nevertheless produces a solution. In India, Pakistan and the carnival; the latter is used to illustrate it below [22]. and some African countries, jugaad refers to the assembly of low-cost vehicles and provisory solutions. And out of the Local Context: informal markets that emerge in the context of precarious Carnivalization of Technique economic development come the terms jua kali in Kenya Characterized by freedom of expression and movement, car- and zizhu chuangxin in China, terms that have connotations nival has a central theme of subversion and temporal inver- akin to gambiarra. sion of social hierarchy. Characterized by “inside-out” and “world-upside-down” logic, it does not equate with hierar- Technology without Extremes chical extinction but rather with a controlled and temporary The diverse practices represented by these terms reveal a experience [23]. It dismantles a system for a short period, global culture based on the benefits, but also the limitations, playing with the possibility of upending social roles [24]. of techno-products as residual effects of product design. In Like carnival, gambiarra subverts subject positions and a world mediated by object paraphernalia—artifacts, gad- the form-function of design objects. The user assumes a gets, interfaces, operational systems, applications and various temporary inventor role, imbuing artifacts with other uses technological devices and accessories—people share prod- and purposes and moving from being a passive consumer ucts as well as attendant modes of subjectivity, utopias and to being an active creator. If carnival is a provisory term for
88 Obici, Gambioluthiery
Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 by guest on 26 September 2021 social roles, gambiarra is an ephemeral solution. Gambiarra lation and even between musical project and sound design. reverses the order of artifacts, serving as a carnivalization of By exploiting sound without necessarily drawing from the technique [25], technology and design. syntax of traditional musical instruments, its practice does not necessarily exist outside music but rather emerges from Sound and Gambiarra a tension within the concept of a musical instrument and its What would gambiarra be in the context of music and sound? material context. Despite their different cultural contexts,Elektronische Musik The boundaries between utilitarian object and instrument and musique concrète are similar to gambiarra regarding the are confused, dynamic and unstable in gambioluthiery. In substitution of nontraditional technological tools for tra- this peripheral zone, gambioluthiery can also be thought of as ditional ones—such as using radio transmission devices as a practice of “technology without extremes” [32], established instruments to compose music. Experimental music has via an upending of hierarchies between high and low tech- further connections to gambiarra: the presence of chance, nology or even between composer and interpreter. an emphasis on process and the adaptation of tools such as Reviewing the history of certain musical instruments, one prepared piano or different media devices. notes the blurred lines that separate an everyday tool from its Gambiarra in music lies between “playing within the rules” use in a musical context. Consider what unites and separates and “playing to subvert the rules” of a musical system. It’s blowpipe and flute; the stretched rope of an arch and arrow similar to hacking. As Richard Stallman, founder of the free and the monochord, lyre or berimbau; ceramic vessel and software movement, wrote, the“ 1950s ‘musical piece’ by John percussion instrument; calabash with seeds and matchbox Cage, 4’33” [which has no notes] is more of a hack than a shaker; wooden box and flamenco cajón; or grater and guiro musical composition” [26]. or reco-reco. What distinguishes the mouth that eats from the Given gambiarra’s primary concerns with subversion and mouth that speaks and from the mouth that sings? Gambio- repurposing, it is easy to associate it with musical practices luthiery reconnects with this broad overlap of instrument like circuit bending and hardware hacking. In these practices, with utilitarian object. electronic circuits are manipulated using cables and jacks to Gambioluthiery reinforces connections between sound alter the energy flow, producing sounds far different from and its materiality as well as the paradoxical gaps between their original design. The resulting sounds, as well as the for- advantage and limitations that techno-consumption pro- mal interfaces, are altered, creating “alien instruments” [27]. duces globally. While the term refers locally to a particular When lack of resources and precariousness are a work’s Brazilian repertoire [33]—examples of which are described foundational elements, the need for adaptation and repair— below—it enhances a general tendency of expanding the idea as well as the risk of failure, glitch and crack—is high. This of the musical instrument through sound art. implies a creative openness to error and unplanned occur- rences—conditions that permeate cracked media. Likewise, Repertoire “dirty electronics” emphasize the exploration of invented in- A precursor tracing the route toward gambioluthiery is the struments and prioritize gesture and social interaction [28]. composer, cellist and luthier Walter Smetak (1913–1984), “Dirt” and “lack” here refer not to substandard quality but whose search for a new music came from his invention of in- rather to the practice of contradicting technology’s suppos- struments meant to extend musical boundaries. This search edly universalizing character to reveal aspects of the dream defined Smetak’s musical and spiritual journey, synthesized that lies hidden in technology. Along similar lines, Paul De- by the wordplay he used to describe the instrument as an Marinis proposed rebuilding obsolete and absurd technolo- object or vehicle that instructs minds: “instru- to instruct; gies [29], a proposal that resembles gambiarra’s “technology ment- to mind. Instruct minds” [34]. From experimental lu- without extremes,” or the carnivalization of design. thiery to plásticas sonoras silenciosas (“silent sound plastic”) [35], extrapolated music proposed other spaces and methods Gambioluthiery for experiencing sound (installations, sculptures, objects and Gambioluthiery is my neologism formed by the prefix actions), which would later be defined as sound art [36]. gambio- (from gambiarra) and luthiery (construction of in- Several of Smetak’s instruments can be related to gam struments) [30]. It refers to construction of instruments ori- biarra by his use of available materials: Piston Cretino (1976), ented around the logic of gambiarra, which involves activities comprising aluminum kitchen funnel, plastic hose and such as composing, decomposing, inventing, proposing, con- piston nozzle; Bicho (Fig. 3); Disco Voador (Fig. 4); kinetic structing, collecting, adapting and appropriating materials, instruments like Treis Sóis (1971), made with wood, metal, objects, artifacts, devices, instruments or system setups. As Styrofoam and PVC pipe; collective instruments such as Pin- such, gambioluthiery intervenes between the form and the dorama (1973), a 2.2-meter-high wind instrument made of purpose of objects and devices, resulting in a new instru- gourds, plastic tubes, bamboo, PVC pipe, wood and metal; ment, performance, intervention, action, music, sound file, and even plasticas sonoras silenciosas like Caosonância installation or sculpture. (1972)—to name a few. Gambioluthiery works in a peripheral zone, pre- or post- In the early 2000s Brazilian artists were using the term musical instrument [31], between the audible and visible, the gambiarra to describe a bricoleur, an objet trouvé, or a ready- musical and the sound arts, the performance and the instal- made creative process that engages different materials, media
Obici, Gambioluthiery 89
Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 by guest on 26 September 2021 Fig. 3. Walter Smetak, Bicho, springs, gourds, wires, spirals, wooden cables and fi ne metal bars that are coupled to a wooden base with pickup that ampli- fi es the noises and friction of objects, 1972. (© Ass. Amigos Walter Smetak)
Fig. 4. Walter Smetak, Disco Voador, wooden base, metal rim, strings, metal disc, two metal rods, Styrofoam box as resonator, 1974. (© Ass. Amigos Walter Smetak)
and artifacts. In the fi eld of sound art, Chelpa Ferro describes gambiarra instruments as “half adapted, constructed in a way . . . [and] the sound is also half limited, half raw” [37]; Paulo Nenfl idio describesgambiarra as a process he used in creat- ing his piece Polvo (2010) “to modify an original function of these materials” [38]; similarly, the sound art duo En Minus One (n-1) explains that “adapting, hacking, building, pro- gramming, improvising, pirating and appropriation were all part of the process” of their work [39]. In addition, gambiarra was present in the local discourse of visual and media art; it was pointed out that the interest in “establishing relations with a political and aesthetic accent” [40] was a feature of its technological culture [41]. Inspired by Cage’s piece Imaginary Landscape no. 4 (1951), Paulo Nenfl idio (1976–) created Decabráquio Radiofônico
to simultaneously play ten radios (Fig. 5). Nenfl idio works Fig. 5. Paulo Nenfl idio, Decabráquio Radiofônico, keyboard, wood, with fragmented elements, starting from ideas, pieces of electronic circuit, radios, speakers, 2006. (© Paulo Nenfl idio) music, performance situations or interactive installations. As something between instrument and installation, Nen- fl idio’s work is a hybrid ins(trumen)tallation, as the term “handmade contraptions” and “design products”—a realm gambioluthiery suggests. He adapts traditional and nontra- in which the work of inventor, luthier and sculptor merge. ditional instruments to the electric context, as in the case of Chelpa Ferro’s work Samba (Fig. 6) uses a table with a Berimbau Elétrico (2003), or to mechanisms of movement, sewing machine on one side, a fi shing reel on another and a as in Bicicleta Maracatu (2000); or he uses existing devices: snare drum in the middle. Th e reel connects to the sewing electronic gadgets such as razors (solenoids) or electrome- machine through a fi shing line stretched over it. When the chanical mechanisms such as hammers or PVC pipe (Teclado machine is turned on, the line hits the snare drum, creating Sismico, 2008). Nenfl idio’s works exist somewhere between a rhythm similar to that of the samba. Due to the line’s
90 Obici, Gambioluthiery
Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 by guest on 26 September 2021 Fig. 6. Chelpa Ferro, Samba, table, sewing machine, fi shing reel and line, Fig. 7. Tato Taborda, Geralda, multiple sound sources, 1988–2001. (© Tato snare drum, 2009. (© Chelpa Ferro) Taborda)
malleability, the sewing machine motor produces a regular A mix of multi-instrument and electroacoustic orchestra cre- rhythm with occasional faults, creating a noisy oscillation ated by Tato Taborda (1960–), Geralda is essentially a one- that adds to the sewing machine noise and spool gears picked man band instrument, where the player activates more than up by microphones placed in each source (drum, reel, ma- 70 sound sources using hands, elbows, knees, head and feet chine). Th e swing is not very convincing, because the source [43]. Designed in 1992–1993, the instrument continued to is a machine: “Samba is treacherous: a machine that wants evolve over the next decade as Taborda added sound layers to have swing (ginga), a kind of gambiarra that wants to be and incorporated or abandoned materials, instruments and precise” [42]. Some features of this work are related to gam- devices. It emerged as an exclusive project based on instru- bioluthiery: assemblage, bricolage, trickery, sonorous visual ments and acoustic objects, which were later microphoned installation, and the unstable procedural rhythm that juxta- (1998–1999) and in 2001 incorporated live electronics. Over posed mechanisms generate. its trajectory, Geralda accumulated three layers of sound Another work that exemplifi es gambioluthiery as an ex- (acoustic, electric and digital), suggesting a possible tax- panded sense of the musical instrument is Geralda (Fig. 7). onomy for gambioluthiery.
References and Notes 7 C. Kelly, Cracked Media: Th e Sound of Malfunction (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009). 1 Th is article is adapted from G. Obici, “Gambiarra e Experimental- ismo Sonoro” (PhD diss., University of São Paulo, 2014). 8 E. Huhtamo, “Tinkering with Media: On the Art of Paul DeMari- nis,” in Paul DeMarinis: Buried in Noise (Heidelberg: Kehrer, 2010) 2 L. Lagnado, “O malabarista e a gambiarra” (2003):
Obici, Gambioluthiery 91
Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 by guest on 26 September 2021 Contemporânea e seu Contexto Sócioeconômico (São Paulo: FAU- 28 Richards [6]. USP, 2013). 29 P. DeMarinis and I. Beirer, eds., Paul DeMarinis: Buried in Noise 14 C. Lévi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago (Heidelberg: Kehrer, 2010). Press, 1966 [1962]). 30 Although luthiery normally refers to the making of stringed instru- 15 E. Oroza, “Desobediencia Tecnológica. De la revolucion al revolico” ments, I use it here to describe the construction of instruments in (2012):
92 Obici, Gambioluthiery
Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01025 by guest on 26 September 2021