DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What Is the Future?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What Is the Future? The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 60(4), 2008, 213-229. 213 Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What is the Future? A Review I. Frans1,2†, B. Lievens1,2*†, C. Heusdens1,2 and K.A. Willems1,2 1 Scientia Terrae Research Institute, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium 2 Research Group Process Microbial Ecology and Management, Department Microbial and Molecular Systems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Association, De Nayer Campus, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium, and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Centre (LfoRCe), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium (Received 1.8.08, Accepted 20.8.08) Key words: biosecurity, diagnosis, DNA array, multiplexing, real-time PCR Abstract Fish diseases pose a universal threat to the ornamental fish industry, aquaculture, and public health. They can be caused by many organisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The lack of rapid, accurate, and reliable means of detecting and identifying fish pathogens is one of the main limitations in fish pathogen diagnosis and disease management and has triggered the search for alternative diagnostic techniques. In this regard, the advent of molecular biology, especially polymerase chain reaction (PCR), provides alternative means for detecting and iden- tifying fish pathogens. Many techniques have been developed, each requiring its own protocol, equipment, and expertise. A major challenge at the moment is the development of multiplex assays that allow accurate detection, identification, and quantification of multiple pathogens in a single assay, even if they belong to different superkingdoms. In this review, recent advances in molecular fish pathogen diagnosis are discussed with an emphasis on nucleic acid-based detec- tion and identification techniques. Major features and applications of current predominant meth- ods and promising methods likely to impact future fish disease control and prevention are out- lined. Introduction Diseases caused by fish pathogens, including that address aquatic animal pathogens and bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, can diseases are becoming an increasingly impor- cause considerable economic losses to the tant focus of these industries (Scarfe et al., ornamental fish and aquaculture industries. 2006). Nevertheless, the lack of rapid, accu- Biosecurity (pathogen preventing) programs rate, and reliable means by which fish * Corresponding author. Tel.: +32-15-305590, fax: +32-15-305599, e-mail: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. 214 Frans et al. pathogens can be timely detected and identi- specific, more sensitive, and more accurate fied has been one of the main limitations in (Cunningham, 2002). fish pathogen diagnosis, fish disease man- One of the most common serological iden- agement, and biosecurity policies. tification techniques is the enzyme-linked Conventional diagnosis methods often rely immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Clark and on interpretation of clinical and histological Adams, 1977) and its variations, which are all signs, culturing pathogens in or on a suitable based on the binding between diagnostic anti- medium, and analysis of morphological, phe- bodies and specific antigens of the target. notypic, or biochemical characteristics of the Because of their versatility, simplicity, speed, presumptive pathogen. Although these meth- and possibility to quantify the target pathogen, ods are fundamental to the development of ELISA assays have been frequently used in any alternative diagnostic method, the accura- pathogen diagnosis, especially for the detec- cy and reliability of these techniques largely tion of viruses and bacteria (Martinez-Govea depend on competent (taxonomical) expertise. et al., 2001; Wagner et al., 2001; Adkison et Further, diagnosis requiring a culturing step is al., 2005; Reschova et al., 2007). Highly spe- generally time-consuming and labor intensive. cific assays can be developed using mono- For example, assays for Flavobacterium or clonal antibodies that recognize a specific epi- Mycobacterium species may require several tope of the pathogen. However, to detect the days for growth with specialized media and different strains of a given virus, for example, growth conditions (Nematollahi et al., 2003; polyclonal antibodies that target multiple epi- Van Trappen et al., 2003). Detection of topes of the pathogen are needed. Renibacterium salmoninarum, the causative Nevertheless, major limitations for the devel- agent of bacterial kidney disease in salmonids, opment of serological assays include that the can take up to 12 weeks (Benediktsdottir et al., required antiserum for detection of a 1991). Moreover, these techniques rely on the pathogen be accessible and affordable and ability of the organism to be cultured in vitro. that the required degree of sensitivity and This aspect considerably limits the applicabili- specificity is often difficult to reach (Adkison et ty of these methods since possibly less than al., 2005). 1% of the microorganisms in an environmental On the other hand, nucleic acid-based sample may be cultured (Rappe and techniques, especially if they make use of Giovannoni, 2003). Viruses are usually detect- polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Mullis and ed by designated virology laboratories using Faloona, 1987), have the advantage of being isolation, electron microscopy, in vitro viral cul- exceedingly sensitive and specific and requir- ture or, if available, serological assays to ing reagents that are easily available. As a detect viral antigens or test for the immune result, PCR-based techniques have increas- response to a given virus (Leong, 1995; ingly been developed for (fish) pathogen diag- Lightner and Redman, 1998; Storch, 2000). nosis (Cunningham, 2002). This trend is stim- Indeed, disadvantages associated with ulated by the continuously growing availability traditional identification techniques have trig- of sequence data in databases such as gered the search for alternative culture-inde- GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Gen pendent detection and identification tech- bank/; Benson et al., 2004) and the increasing niques, such as those based on the detection availability of microbial full genome sequences of antigenic determinants (serological tech- (e.g., http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Microbes/). niques) or nucleic acids (nucleic acid-based Nevertheless, although most of these techniques). Compared to traditional assays, methods are convenient for the detection of a these molecular techniques can avoid prob- single pathogen, screening for large numbers lems in investigating organisms for which no of different pathogens relies on a significant culture medium, cell lines (for viruses), or number of parallel tests, often using different detection method is available. In addition, technologies (Evangelopoulos et al., 2001; these techniques are generally faster, more Lievens et al., 2005a). Consequently, testing Molecular identification of fish pathogens 215 multiple targets using these methods is ineffi- sequence domains, (c) its high discriminatory cient, laborious, and expensive. Therefore, a potential over a wide range of taxonomical number of methods have recently been devel- levels, (d) its, often, multiple-copy nature, oped that can be used for the simultaneous resulting in more sensitive analyses, and (e) detection of multiple pathogens, encompass- the extensive availability of ribosomal DNA ing multiplex PCR, DNA arrays, and PCR sequences in public databases. These exten- arrays (Elnifro et al., 2000; del Cerro et al., sive sequence data allow comparison of 2002; Wang et al., 2002, 2003; Gonzalez et sequences and, in turn, determination of diag- al., 2004; Mata et al., 2004; Warsen et al., nostic regions that can be used to design spe- 2004; Lievens et al., 2005a). cific primers, probes, or oligonucleotides. In this manuscript some recent advances Nevertheless, ribosomal DNA sequences do in fish pathogen diagnosis are described, with not always reflect sufficient variation to dis- an emphasis on nucleic acid-based detection cern particular species (Mollet et al., 1997; and identification of the two major fish patho- Blackwood et al., 2000; Thompson et al., genic groups for which classical detection 2004; Kupfer et al., 2006). Therefore, other may be problematic: bacteria and viruses. housekeeping genes showing intertaxa Major features and applications of the most sequence variation are becoming more inten- predominant methods used nowadays and sively studied, including the DNA gyrase sub- some methods that look promising for the unit B gene (gyrB; Watanabe et al., 2001; future are outlined. Yanez et al., 2003), genes encoding the RNA polymerase subunits A and B (rpoA and rpoB; Nucleic Acid-Based Identification of Fish Dahllof et al., 2000; Thompson et al., 2005; Pathogens Tarr et al., 2007), the recombinase subunit A Choice of target sequences. The first stage in gene (recA; Thompson et al., 2004), genes the development of nucleic acid-based diag- encoding heat shock proteins (hsp60, hsp65 nostic assays is the selection of specific and dnaJ; Nhung et al., 2007), the elongation sequences that can be used to identify factor-Tu encoding (tuf) gene (Mignard and pathogens. There are some generally applic- Flandrois, 2007), and the gene encoding a able techniques for bacteria and fungi, but manganese-dependent enzyme (sodA; viruses usually need different approaches. Adekambi and Drancourt, 2004). However, in Regarding bacteria, the most common strate- comparison
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease
    Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease Larry Hammell - Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Craig Stephen- Centre for Coastal Health, University of Calgary, Canada Ian Bricknell- School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, USA Øystein Evensen- Norwegian School of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, Norway Patricio Bustos- ADL Diagnostic Chile Ltda., Chile With Contributions by: Ricardo Enriquez- University of Austral, Chile 1 Citation: Hammell, L., Stephen, C., Bricknell, I., Evensen Ø., and P. Bustos. 2009 “Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease” commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, available at http://wwf.worldwildlife.org/site/PageNavigator/SalmonSOIForm Corresponding author: Larry Hammell, email: [email protected] This report was commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue. The Salmon Dialogue is a multi-stakeholder, multi-national group which was initiated by the World Wildlife Fund in 2004. Participants include salmon producers and other members of the market chain, NGOs, researchers, retailers, and government officials from major salmon producing and consuming countries. The goal of the Dialogue is to credibly develop and support the implementation of measurable, performance-based standards that minimize or eliminate the key negative environmental and social impacts of salmon farming, while permitting the industry to remain economically viable The Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue focuses their research and standard development on seven key areas of impact of salmon production including: social; feed; disease; salmon escapes; chemical inputs; benthic impacts and siting; and, nutrient loading and carrying capacity. Funding for this report and other Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue supported work is provided by the members of the Dialogue‘s steering committee and their donors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ASEAN-FEN 9Th International Fisheries Symposium BOOK of ABSTRACTS
    2019 ASEAN-FEN 9th International Fisheries Symposium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS A New Horizon in Fisheries and Aquaculture Through Education, Research and Innovation 18-21 November 2019 Seri Pacific Hotel Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Contents Oral Session Location… .................................................................... 1 Poster Session ...................................................................................... 2 Special Session… ................................................................................ 3 Special Session 1: ....................................................................... 4 Special Session 2: ..................................................................... 10 Special Session 3: ..................................................................... 16 Oral Presentation… ......................................................................... 26 Session 1: Fisheries Biology and Resource Management 1 ………………………………………………………………….…...27 Session 2: Fisheries Biology and Resource Management 2 …………………………………………………………...........….…62 Session 3: Nutrition and Feed........................................................ 107 Session 4: Aquatic Animal Health ................................................ 146 Session 5: Fisheries Socio-economies, Gender, Extension and Education… ..................................................................................... 196 Session 6: Information Technology and Engineering .................. 213 Session 7: Postharvest, Fish Products and Food Safety… ......... 219 Session
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Disorders of Fish
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Disorders of the Respiratory System in Pet and Ornamental Fish a, b Helen E. Roberts, DVM *, Stephen A. Smith, DVM, PhD KEYWORDS Pet fish Ornamental fish Branchitis Gill Wet mount cytology Hypoxia Respiratory disorders Pathology Living in an aquatic environment where oxygen is in less supply and harder to extract than in a terrestrial one, fish have developed a respiratory system that is much more efficient than terrestrial vertebrates. The gills of fish are a unique organ system and serve several functions including respiration, osmoregulation, excretion of nitroge- nous wastes, and acid-base regulation.1 The gills are the primary site of oxygen exchange in fish and are in intimate contact with the aquatic environment. In most cases, the separation between the water and the tissues of the fish is only a few cell layers thick. Gills are a common target for assault by infectious and noninfectious disease processes.2 Nonlethal diagnostic biopsy of the gills can identify pathologic changes, provide samples for bacterial culture/identification/sensitivity testing, aid in fungal element identification, provide samples for viral testing, and provide parasitic organisms for identification.3–6 This diagnostic test is so important that it should be included as part of every diagnostic workup performed on a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • AQUATIC SCIENCES and ENGINEERING
    AQUATIC SCIENCES and ENGINEERING VOLUME: 33 ISSUE: 3 2018 EISSN 2602-473X AQUATIC SCIENCES and ENGINEERING OWNER OF JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences Prof. Genario Belmonte University of Salento, Italy EDITOR IN CHIEF Prof. Carsten Harms Prof. Devrim Memiş Applied University Bremerhaven, Germany İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey Prof. Konstantinos Kormas University of Thessaly, Greece DEAN Prof. Sergi Sabater Prof. Dr. Meriç Albay Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Spain Prof. Maya Petrova Stoyneva-Gaertner CO EDITOR IN CHIEF Sofia University “St Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria Prof. Özkan Özden Prof. Nuray Erkan İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey LANGUAGE EDITOR Prof. Reyhan Akçaalan İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey Joanne Bates Department of Foreign Languages, İstanbul University, Prof. Saadet Karakulak İstanbul, Turkey İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey Prof. Sühendan Mol Tokay İstanbul University Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Lukas Kalous Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Dr. Klaus Kohlmann Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Germany Dr. Piero Addis University of Cagliari, Italy Dr. Nico Salmaso Research and Innovation Centre, Italy Dr. Petra Viser University of Amsterdam, Netherlands Publisher Copyright © 2018 İstanbul University Press Journal Adress: İstanbul University Faculty Aquatic Sciences, Ordu Caddesi No:8 34134 Laleli Fatih/İstanbul Turkey E-mail: [email protected] for submussion instructions, subcription and all other information visit http://dergipark.gov.tr/tjas Publication Services Publisher Publication Coordinators Graphics Department İbrahim KARA Betül ÇİMEN Ünal ÖZER Özlem ÇAKMAK Neslihan YAMAN Publication Director Ali ŞAHİN Okan AYDOĞAN Deniz DURAN Merve SAĞLAMER Finance and Administration İrem DELİÇAY Contact Zeynep YAKIŞIRER Elif İLKKURŞUN Address: Büyükdere Cad.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches
    microorganisms Review A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches Jie Ma 1,2 , Timothy J. Bruce 1,2 , Evan M. Jones 1,2 and Kenneth D. Cain 1,2,* 1 Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (T.J.B.); [email protected] (E.M.J.) 2 Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 October 2019; Accepted: 14 November 2019; Published: 16 November 2019 Abstract: Fish immunization has been carried out for over 50 years and is generally accepted as an effective method for preventing a wide range of bacterial and viral diseases. Vaccination efforts contribute to environmental, social, and economic sustainability in global aquaculture. Most licensed fish vaccines have traditionally been inactivated microorganisms that were formulated with adjuvants and delivered through immersion or injection routes. Live vaccines are more efficacious, as they mimic natural pathogen infection and generate a strong antibody response, thus having a greater potential to be administered via oral or immersion routes. Modern vaccine technology has targeted specific pathogen components, and vaccines developed using such approaches may include subunit, or recombinant, DNA/RNA particle vaccines. These advanced technologies have been developed globally and appear to induce greater levels of immunity than traditional fish vaccines. Advanced technologies have shown great promise for the future of aquaculture vaccines and will provide health benefits and enhanced economic potential for producers. This review describes the use of conventional aquaculture vaccines and provides an overview of current molecular approaches and strategies that are promising for new aquaculture vaccine development.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Disease Impacts of Hatcheries on Downstream Salmonids in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michelle Jakaitis for the degree of Master of Science in Microbiology presented on November 4th, 2014. Title: Assessing Disease Impacts of Hatcheries on Downstream Salmonids in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________________ Jerri L. Bartholomew Hatcheries are often perceived as a source of pathogen amplification, potentially increasing disease risk to free-ranging populations; at the same time, free-ranging fishes may introduce pathogens into hatcheries through untreated water sources. Many pathogens exist naturally within the environment (with the exception of introduced pathogens) and the presence of a pathogen does not guarantee infection or disease (Naish, Taylor III, Levin, Quinn, Winton, Huppert & Hilborn 2007). Infections can be acute, chronic, or asymptomatic, fish may die, recover, or become carriers (Naish et al. 2007), and pathogens may be shed from any of these stages (Scottish Executive 2002). Most salmon and trout hatcheries along the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, USA, utilize an untreated river water supply for their rearing ponds and release this water, untreated, back into the river. This creates a potential for waterborne pathogens present in free-ranging hosts to be transmitted through the water supply to hatchery populations. Moreover, any hatchery epizootic can amplify pathogens and release these into the water, which could have a direct impact on free- ranging populations exposed to those pathogens in hatchery effluent. The goal of this thesis was to assess transmission of the pathogens Flavobacterium columnare, F. psychrophilum, Aeromonas salmonicida, Renibacterium salmonicida, and Infectious Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus (IHNV), at selected hatcheries in the Willamette River Basin. To accomplish this, I considered historical data and hatchery-specific and pathogen-specific factors involved in transmission and disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Pathology Section Laboratory Manual
    FISH PATHOLOGY SECTION LABORATORY MANUAL Edited by Theodore R. Meyers, Ph.D. Special Publication No. 12 2nd Edition Alaska Department of Fish and Game Commercial Fisheries Division P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, Alaska 99802-5526 January 2000 Rev. 03/98 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................................................v CHAPTER/TITLE Page .................................................................................................................... 1. Sample Collection and Submission.............................................................................1-1 to 1-8 I. Finfish Diagnostics....................................................................................................... 1-1 II. Finfish Bacteriology ..................................................................................................... 1-2 III. Virology ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 IV. Fluorescent Antibody Test (FAT) ................................................................................ 1-4 V. ELISA Sampling of Kidneys for the BKD Agent (see ELISA Chapter 9).................... 1-5 VI. Parasitology and General Necropsy ........................................................................... 1-5 VII. Histology ...................................................................................................................... 1-5
    [Show full text]
  • Disease of Aquatic Organisms 80:241
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 80: 241–258, 2008 Published August 7 Dis Aquat Org COMBINED AUTHOR AND TITLE INDEX (Volumes 71 to 80, 2006–2008) A (2006) Persistence of Piscirickettsia salmonis and detection of serum antibodies to the bacterium in white seabass Atrac- Aarflot L, see Olsen AB et al. (2006) 72:9–17 toscion nobilis following experimental exposure. 73:131–139 Abreu PC, see Eiras JC et al. (2007) 77:255–258 Arunrut N, see Kiatpathomchai W et al. (2007) 79:183–190 Acevedo C, see Silva-Rubio A et al. (2007) 79:27–35 Arzul I, see Carrasco N et al. (2007) 79:65–73 Adams A, see McGurk C et al. (2006) 73:159–169 Arzul I, see Corbeil S et al. (2006) 71:75–80 Adkison MA, see Arkush KD et al. (2006) 73:131–139 Arzul I, see Corbeil S et al. (2006) 71:81–85 Aeby GS, see Work TM et al. (2007) 78:255–264 Ashton KJ, see Kriger KM et al. (2006) 71:149–154 Aguirre WE, see Félix F et al. (2006) 75:259–264 Ashton KJ, see Kriger KM et al. (2006) 73:257–260 Aguirre-Macedo L, see Gullian-Klanian M et al. (2007) 79: Atkinson SD, see Bartholomew JL et al. (2007) 78:137–146 237–247 Aubard G, see Quillet E et al. (2007) 76:7–16 Aiken HM, see Hayward CJ et al. (2007) 79:57–63 Audemard C, Carnegie RB, Burreson EM (2008) Shellfish tis- Aishima N, see Maeno Y et al. (2006) 71:169–173 sues evaluated for Perkinsus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Monitoring for Your Zebrafish Colonies
    Discover better insight Health Monitoring for your zebrafish colonies The clear choice for a comprehensive health monitoring program. BioResearch Your partner in discovery Contents Introduction . 3 Edwardsiella ictaluri. 4 Flavobacterium columnare . 5 Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. 6 Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) . 7 Mycobacterium abscessus . 8 Mycobacterium chelonae . .9 Mycobacterium fortuitum. 10 Mycobacterium haemophilum. 11 Mycobacterium marinum. 12 Mycobacterium peregrinum . 13 Piscinoodinium pillulare . 14 Pleistophora hyphessobryconis . 15 Pseudocapillaria tomentosa . 16 Pseudoloma neurophilia . 17 Profiles. 18 Specimen preparation and shipping . 20 Additional resources . 21 Introduction A growing number of researchers are choosing zebrafish as models for biomedical research because of the advantages zebrafish offer over other animal models for certain studies. First, their small size and ease of breeding make zebrafish relatively inexpensive to maintain, which allows researchers to perform experiments using zebrafish that would be cost prohibitive using larger animal models. Secondly, embryos are transparent, which allows easy visualization of cell and organ development and permits experimental manipulations involving DNA or mRNA injection, cell labeling and transplantation. Zebrafish are now commonly employed as models in a diverse range of bioresearch fields, such as immunology, infectious disease, cardiac and vascular disease research, chemical and drug toxicity studies, reproductive biology and cancer research to name a few. As with other vertebrate models used in research, undetected infections can alter, confound or invalidate experimental results. Therefore, it is important to develop and utilize a health monitoring program to detect infectious agents that may affect the animal and the research outcomes. IDEXX BioResearch has developed sensitive molecular diagnostic assays to improve health monitoring for zebrafish colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Diseases of Cultured Striped Bass, Morone Saxatilis, and Its Hybrid (M
    PUBLICATION 600-080 Common Diseases of Cultured Striped Bass, Morone saxatilis, and Its Hybrid (M. saxitilis x M. chrysops) Stephen A. Smith, Professor, Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech David Pasnik, Research Scientist, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Fish Health and Disease Parasites Striped bass (Morone saxitilis) and hybrid striped bass Parasitic infestations are a common problem in striped (M. saxitilis x M. chrysops) are widely cultured for bass culture and may have harmful health consequences both food and sportfishing markets. Because these fish when fish are heavily parasitized (Smith and Noga 1992). are commonly raised in high densities under intensive aquaculture situations (e.g., cages, ponds, tanks), they Ichthyophthiriosis or “Ich” is caused by the ciliated are often exposed to suboptimal conditions. Healthy protozoan parasite Ichthyophthirius multifiliis in fresh- striped bass can generally resist many of the viral, water or Cryptocaryon irritans in saltwater. These bacterial, fungal, and parasitic pathogens, but the fish parasites cause raised, white lesions visible on the become increasingly susceptible to disease agents when skin and gill (commonly called “white spot disease”) immunocompromised as a result of stress. and can cause high mortalities in a population of fish. The parasite burrows into skin and gill tissue (figure A number of noninfectious problems are commonly 1), resulting in osmotic stress and allowing secondary encountered in striped bass and hybrid striped bass bacterial and fungal infections to become established culture facilities. Factors such as poor water quality, at the site of penetration. The life cycle of the parasite improper nutrition, and gas supersaturation can directly can be completed in a short time, so light infestations cause morbidity (clinical disease) and mortality.
    [Show full text]