DOCSLIB.ORG

November/December 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

november/december 2015 January/February 2009 DEPARTMENTS From The President 2 From The Editor 3 18 Parasite Treatment Reduces Flavobacterium Columnare GAA Activities 5 Infection In Tilapia Advocacy And Advances 10 De-Hai Xu, Ph.D.; Craig Shoemaker, Ph.D.; Dunhau Zhang, Ph.D. Advocate Advertisers 80 20 Increased Density Improves Feeding Response, Growth Performance In Grouper Ingrid Lupatsch, Ph.D. On the cover: 22 Study: Inbreeding Affects Body Weight, But Not Survival In White Shrimp Responsible aquaculture provides healthy food and important employ- Dr. Lidia de los Ríos-Pérez, Dr. Gabriel R. Campos-Montes, ment opportunities around the world. The Global Aquaculture Alliance Dr. Alfonso Martínez-Ortega, Dr. Héctor Castillo Juárez, has been proud to share this news through the Global Aquaculture Advo- Dr. Hugo H. Montaldo cate magazine. Please continue to read the new Advocate online. Photo by Noppharat_th. 26 Natural Feed Additive Improves Shrimp Productivity In Ecuador Demonstration Juan Carlos Valle; Peter Coutteau, Ph.D. Page 20 28 The Bottom Line Density Ups Feeding Feed And Water Quality Revisited Response In Grouper Thomas R. Zeigler, Ph.D. Contrary to common perceptions, 32 Sustainable Aquaculture Practices grouper stocked at high density had Efficiency Of Mechanical Aeration greater feed intake and better feed Claude E. Boyd, Ph.D. conversion. 35 Biofilter Inoculation In Recirculating Aquaculture Systems Dr. Adrian A. Bischoff, Laura Koch, Marcus Thon, Prof. Dr. Bela H. Buck Page 66 37 Dietary Acidification In Aquaculture Enhanced AHPND Detection Christian Lückstädt, Ph.D. A study found that shrimp allowed to decompose prior to processing 39 Maximizing Nutrition For Adult Marine Fish reflected improved PCR detection of AHPND. Jorge A. Suarez, Ph.D.; Carlos Tudela; Christina Belfranin; Steven Sutton; Matthew Taynor; Ronald Hoenig; Drew Davis; Thiago Raggi; Daniel D. Benetti, Ph.D. 42 Biomass Density Affects Bass Production, Not Feed Conversion, Growth Rates In RAS 62 Double-Stranded RNA Against WSSV Genes Jeonghwan Park, Ph.D.; Nilima Renukdas, Ph.D.; Trevor Luna; Provides Antiviral Protection In Shrimp Luke A. Roy, Ph.D.; David Heikes C. M. Escobedo-Bonilla, S. Vega-Peña, C. H. Mejía-Ruíz 45 Soy-Fed Fish News 64 From Bench To Farm – Innovative On-Site Diagnostic Kit Soy-Based Feeds Evaluated For Production Identifies WSSV In Shrimp Of Fast-Growing Amazonian Paiche Mary Beth B. Maningas; Joselito A. Tabardillo, Jr.; Herbert E. Quintero, Ph.D.; Michael C. Cremer, Ph.D.; Christopher Marlowe Caipang Jairo Amezquita; Francisco De la Torre; Luis Henostroza 66 Limited Decomposition Enhances PCR Detection 48 Community-Based Approach Supports Aquaculture Of AHPND Vibrio In Shrimp Development In Pacific Islands Nathene L. Antonio, B.S.; James A Brock, DVM; Hank Bauman Meredith Brooks; Cheng-Sheng Lee, Ph.D. 68 NIRS Technology Ensures Shrimp Feed Quality At Farm Level Alberto J. P. Nunes, Ph.D.; Thiago Costa Paiva; Sergio de Lima Cavalcanti 50 Russian Food Embargo: Who Have Been Hurt? Kristin Lien; Ragnar Tveteras, Ph.D. 71 Novel Air-Based System Transfers Large Salmon During Harvest 53 Seafood And Health Steven Summerfelt, Ph.D.; Travis May; Curtis Crouse; Abundant Food, Yet People Are Starving Jeanne McKnight, Ph.D.; Vincent Byran III Roy D. Palmer, FAICD 73 Natural Feed Additives Enhance Rainbow Trout 55 Food Safety And Technology Performance Human Enteric Viruses In Shellfish – Seunghan Lee, Fasil Taddese, Seonghun Won, Hyeonho Yun, Part IV. Norovirus Prevalence In Europe Sangeun Kim, Jungkeug Park, Dr. S. C. Bai George J. Flick, Jr., Ph.D.; David D. Kuhn, Ph.D. 76 Indoor-Raised Shrimp Find Potential Market 58 U.S. Seafood Market In Kentucky State University Test Paul Brown, Jr.; Janice Schreiber; Angel Rubio Andrew J. Ray, Ph.D. 78 Metabolomics Approaches To Improve Mussel Larval Production Andrea C. Alfaro, Ph.D.; Tim Young, Ph.D. ii November/December 2015 global aquaculture advocate global aquaculture advocate November/December 2015 1 from the president from the editor GLOBAL AQUACULTURE FOUNDING MEMBERS ALLIANCE Advancement One Journey Ends, Agribrands International Inc. The Global Aquaculture Alli ance is an in- ternational non-profit, non-gov ernmental Agromarina de Panamá, S.A. association whose mission is to further envi - Aqualma – Unima Group ronmen tally responsible aquaculture to meet And Nostalgia Another Begins world food needs. Our members are produc- From the outset, the Global Aquaculture Alliance Incredible, truly quantum leaps have taken place Aquatec/Camanor ers, pro cessors, marketers and retailers of sea- Asociación Nacional de Acuicultores de Colombia food prod ucts worldwide. All aqua­­culturists was convinced that aquaculture has enormous poten- in our industry in the last two decades, and the in all sectors are welcome in the organization. tial to grow and feed the world, provided it is prac- Global Aquaculture Advocate has been privileged to Asociación Nacional de Acuicultores de Honduras OFFICERS ticed in a responsible way. During our brief history, cover them for you during the last 17 years. In our Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Camarão Bangladesh Chapter – Global Aquaculture Alliance George Chamberlain, President many challenges have threatened to block this special “Advocacy and Advances” section in this last George Belize Aquaculture, Ltd. Bill Herzig, Vice President growth, but we have overcome these by working regular print issue of the Advocate, we highlight some Darryl E. Jory, Ph.D. Lee Bloom, Secretary together. Aquaculture stakeholders around the world Chamberlain, Ph.D. Editor, Development Manager Bluepoints Co., Inc. President of the major developments made during our tenure. Jeff Fort, Treasurer and throughout the value chain have found solutions Global Aquaculture Advocate Cámara Nacional de Acuacultura Wally Stevens, Executive Director Global Aquaculture Alliance Aquaculture continues to grow and currently con- [email protected] Camaronera de Coclé, S.A. BOARD OF DIRECTORS to help avoid habitat destruction and improve social [email protected] tributes more than 50% of the world’s seafood pro- Cargill Animal Nutrition welfare, efficiency of resource use, food safety and duction. Annual global aquaculture output has more Bert Bachmann accountability throughout the production chain. Chicken of the Sea Frozen Foods Mike Berthet than doubled during these 17 years, from around 30 mmt in 1999 to close to 70 mmt Continental Grain Co. We still have far to go on this journey, but we’ve learned that communication is a Lee Bloom today. Aquaculture plays a critical part in the global food security portfolio, and contin- C.P. Aquaculture Business Group Rittirong Boonmechote vital tool in the GAA mission to advocate, educate and demonstrate responsible aqua- ued development will be essential. Darden Restaurants George Chamberlain culture. We don’t see our role in communication as reporting daily news events. We are According to a recent estimate by the international research organization WorldFish Deli Group, Ecuador Shahridan Faiez more involved with recognizing trends, anticipating the challenges and working Robert Fields Center, by 2030, the world’s population will require 232 mmt of seafood, approximately Deli Group, Honduras together with stakeholders to identify and describe potential solutions. Jeff Fort 62 mmt more than we are expected to produce unless significant steps are taken. Only Delta Blue Aquaculture John Galiher We have been greatly assisted in this process by the digital revolution in communi- Diamante del Mar S.A. Laura Garrido our farmed seafood industry can provide this additional production. cations, from faxes to dial-up and now WiFi Internet access. From basic e-mail to text Eastern Fish Co. Nelson Griffin messaging on smart phones, Facebook, YouTube, Skype and a myriad of social media Bill Herzig Efficiency And More El Rosario, S.A. Ray Jones mechanisms. As the tools for communication have advanced, the Global Aquaculture How do we get there? I believe improving the efficiency of aquaculture production is Empacadora Nacional, C.A. Alex Ko Advocate has also adapted to serve your needs more efficiently. Expack Seafood, Inc. Jordan Mazzetta the major strategy with the potentially largest impact. Ours is already a relatively effi- The Advocate began in 1998 as a 16-page black and white newsletter with a circula- Expalsa – Exportadora de Alimentos S.A. Robins McIntosh cient industry when compared to terrestrial livestock production. But we need to do Sergio Nates tion of a few hundred. In 1999, it became a magazine with partial color content, and in much more. FCE Agricultural Research and Management, Inc. John Peppel June 2005, it became a full-color magazine. Circulation gradually increased to a peak of Increasing sustainable production will require more output from established species; High Liner Foods John Schramm 5,000 print copies per issue. In 2013, a searchable archive of all published articles was production development for new species; expansion into new inland, near- and offshore India Chapter – Global Aquaculture Alliance Jeff Sedacca developed. This archive now includes thousands of articles. In 2010, a free digital Advo- Indian Ocean Aquaculture Group Wally Stevens areas; improved domestication and genetic selection; better aquafeeds and new ingredi- INVE Aquaculture, N.V. cate was developed and offered to over 12,000 e-mail subscribers. ents; improved health management; new production technologies with increased con-
Recommended publications
  • Technical and Economical Feasibility of On-Farm Fish Feed Production Using Fishmeal Analogs Kerry W

    Technical and Economical Feasibility of On-Farm Fish Feed Production Using Fishmeal Analogs Kerry W

    North Central Regional Aquaculture Center North Central Regional Aquaculture Center Publications and Papers 1996 Technical and economical feasibility of on-farm fish feed production using fishmeal analogs Kerry W. Tudor Illinois State University Ronald R. Rosati United States Department of Agriculture Patrick D. O'Rourke Illinois State University Y. Victor Wu United States Department of Agriculture David Sessa United States Department of Agriculture See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ncrac_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Tudor, Kerry W.; Rosati, Ronald R.; O'Rourke, Patrick D.; Wu, Y. Victor; Sessa, David; and Brown, Paul, "Technical and economical feasibility of on-farm fish feed production using fishmeal analogs" (1996). North Central Regional Aquaculture Center Publications and Papers. 1. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ncrac_pubs/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the North Central Regional Aquaculture Center at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Central Regional Aquaculture Center Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Technical and economical feasibility of on-farm fish feed production using fishmeal analogs Abstract Ten experimental diets and one control diet were fed to 720 tilapia (20 fish × 12 cages × three replicates) in a recirculating aquaculture system to determine the economic significance of replacing fishmeal with fishmeal analogs if the fishmeal analogs were processed on-site by the producer.
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
  • COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products

    COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products

    Validity date from COUNTRY United States 22/01/2021 00499 SECTION Fishery products Date of publication 28/07/2007 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000025102 GET SEAFOOD, INC. Winter Haven Florida PP 08/04/2013 1000025909 Fagan Alligator Products, Inc. Dade City Florida PP 1000084596 Sea-Trek Enterprises, Inc. East Greenwich Rhode Island PP O! 10/07/2008 1000112376 Pontchartrain Blue Crab Slidell Louisiana PP 14/04/2010 1000113172 Fishermen's Ice & Bait, Inc. Madeira Beach Florida PP 1000113708 Beck's Smokery Pompano Beach Florida PP 1000113902 Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Port Everglades Florida CS 16/11/2011 1000114005 D & D Seafood Corporation Marathon Florida PP 1000114027 BAMA SEA PRODUCTS St. Petersburg Florida PP 1000114048 Moon's Seafood Company W. Melbourne Florida PP O! 1000114049 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc., Florida Sunrise Florida PP 13/10/2017 Facility 1000114069 Placeres & Sons Seafood Hialeah Florida PP 1000114070 Webb's Seafood, Inc. Youngstown Florida PP 14/10/2009 1000114156 Cox's Wholesale Seafood, Inc. Tampa Florida PP 1000114170 Kings Seafood, Inc. Port Orange Florida PP 1 / 59 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000114326 Optimus, Inc. Dba Marky's Miami Florida PP 1000115645 AMERIQUAL FOODS LLC Evansville Indiana PP 06/02/2019 1000115810 Henriksen Fisheries, Inc Sister Bay Wisconsin PP 1000117125 RB Manufacturing LLC Salt Lake City Utah PP 08/01/2015 1000120312 Stauber Performance Ingredients, Inc. Florida New York PP 08/08/2019 1000120556 Plenus Group, Inc. Lowell Massachusetts PP 06/05/2008 1000120753 GARBO LOBSTER LLC Groton Connecticut PP 17/10/2016 1000121950 True World Foods, NY LLC Elizabeth New Jersey PP Aq 1000122358 Lamonica Fine Foods, Inc.
  • Thailand's Shrimp Culture Growing

    Thailand's Shrimp Culture Growing

    Foreign Fishery Developments BURMA ':.. VIET­ ,' . .' NAM LAOS .............. Thailand's Shrimp ...... Culture Growing THAI LAND ,... ~samut Sangkhram :. ~amut Sakorn Pond cultivation ofblacktigerprawns, khlaarea. Songkhla's National Institute '. \ \ Bangkok........· Penaeus monodon, has brought sweep­ ofCoastal Aquaculture (NICA) has pro­ , ••~ Samut prokan ing economic change over the last2 years vided the technological foundation for the to the coastal areas of Songkhla and establishment of shrimp culture in this Nakhon Si Thammarat on the Malaysian area. Since 1982, NICA has operated a Peninsula (Fig. 1). Large, vertically inte­ large shrimp hatchery where wild brood grated aquaculture companies and small­ stock are reared on high-quality feeds in .... Gulf of () VIET­ scale rice farmers alike have invested optimum water temperature and salinity NAM heavily in the transformation of paddy conditions. The initial buyers ofNICA' s Thailand fields into semi-intensive ponds for shrimp postlarvae (pI) were small-scale Nakhon Si Thammarat shrimp raising. Theyhave alsodeveloped shrimp farmers surrounding Songkhla • Hua Sai Songkhla an impressive infrastructure ofelectrical Lake. .. Hot Yai and water supplies, feeder roads, shrimp Andaman hatcheries, shrimp nurseries, feed mills, Background Sea cold storage, and processing plants. Thailand's shrimp culture industry is Located within an hour's drive ofSong­ the fastest growing in Southeast Asia. In khla's new deep-waterport, the burgeon­ only 5 years, Thailand has outstripped its Figure 1.-Thailand and its major shrimp ing shrimp industry will have direct competitors to become the region's num­ culture area. access to international markets. Despite ber one producer. Thai shrimp harvests a price slump since May 1989, expansion in 1988 reached 55,000 metric tons (t), onall fronts-production, processingand a 320 percent increase over the 13,000 t marketing-continues at a feverish pace.
  • New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: a Comprehensive Landscape Analysis

    New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: a Comprehensive Landscape Analysis

    Photo by Pablo Sanchez Quiza New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Environmental Defense Fund | Oceans Technology Solutions | April 2021 New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Authors: Christopher Cusack, Omisha Manglani, Shems Jud, Katie Westfall and Rod Fujita Environmental Defense Fund Nicole Sarto and Poppy Brittingham Nicole Sarto Consulting Huff McGonigal Fathom Consulting To contact the authors please submit a message through: edf.org/oceans/smart-boats edf.org | 2 Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................7 2. Transformative Technologies......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Sensors ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Satellite remote sensing ...........................................................................................................................12 2.3 Data Collection Platforms ......................................................................................................................
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions

    Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions

    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
  • Ecosystem Services Generated by Fish Populations

    Ecosystem Services Generated by Fish Populations

    AR-211 Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 253 –268 ANALYSIS Ecosystem services generated by fish populations Cecilia M. Holmlund *, Monica Hammer Natural Resources Management, Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, S-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract In this paper, we review the role of fish populations in generating ecosystem services based on documented ecological functions and human demands of fish. The ongoing overexploitation of global fish resources concerns our societies, not only in terms of decreasing fish populations important for consumption and recreational activities. Rather, a number of ecosystem services generated by fish populations are also at risk, with consequences for biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and ultimately human welfare. Examples are provided from marine and freshwater ecosystems, in various parts of the world, and include all life-stages of fish. Ecosystem services are here defined as fundamental services for maintaining ecosystem functioning and resilience, or demand-derived services based on human values. To secure the generation of ecosystem services from fish populations, management approaches need to address the fact that fish are embedded in ecosystems and that substitutions for declining populations and habitat losses, such as fish stocking and nature reserves, rarely replace losses of all services. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ecosystem services; Fish populations; Fisheries management; Biodiversity 1. Introduction 15 000 are marine and nearly 10 000 are freshwa­ ter (Nelson, 1994). Global capture fisheries har­ Fish constitute one of the major protein sources vested 101 million tonnes of fish including 27 for humans around the world. There are to date million tonnes of bycatch in 1995, and 11 million some 25 000 different known fish species of which tonnes were produced in aquaculture the same year (FAO, 1997).
  • Development Shrimp Farming Pakistan

    Development Shrimp Farming Pakistan

    Current status on European lobster aquaculture in Europe Report from the 3rd annual ELCE meeting held in Stavanger, Norway on 18 – 19 May 2015 Sponsored by: Report from workshop held on 18-19 May 2015 in Stavanger, Norway Address: Kjelsbergtunet 29 N-4050 Sola, Norway Telephone: +47 51 32 59 00 Fax: +47 51 32 59 01 Cellular: +47 90 19 67 31 E-mail: [email protected] Title: Serial No. Date Current status on European lobster aquaculture in Europe. 0X – 2015 25 September 2015 Report from the 3rd annual ELCE meeting held in Stavanger, Report/Document Pages: Norway 18 – 19 May 2015. No. 35 pp. Author: Geographical Topic group: Distribution: Asbjørn Drengstig, Ivar Lund, Ann- area: Lobster aquaculture Open Lisbeth Agnalt, Dom Boothroyd, Carly Europe Daniels, Knut Jørstad, Susanne Eriksen, Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir, Roberta Cimmaruta, Gonzalo Pèrez Benavente, Jane McMinn & Beth Evensen File/Archive: Client/Employer: Europe/workshops-lobster/01-15 European Lobster Centre of Excellence Abstract: On behalf of the network European Lobster Centre of Excellence (ELCE), Norwegian Lobster Farm hosted the 3rd annual meeting. Altogether 36 participants from a total of eight countries were present during the two days workshop. The main aim of the meeting was to organise a 3rd workshop in the ELCE network. ELCE wanted to continue the positive development within the network between Nordic companies and institutions carrying out research and commercial attempts with the European lobster. Due to a strong interest from countries outside the Nordic region, several European companies and research institutions were also invited in order to highlight status on lobster aquaculture in Europe.
  • Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease

    Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease

    Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease Larry Hammell - Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Craig Stephen- Centre for Coastal Health, University of Calgary, Canada Ian Bricknell- School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, USA Øystein Evensen- Norwegian School of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, Norway Patricio Bustos- ADL Diagnostic Chile Ltda., Chile With Contributions by: Ricardo Enriquez- University of Austral, Chile 1 Citation: Hammell, L., Stephen, C., Bricknell, I., Evensen Ø., and P. Bustos. 2009 “Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease” commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, available at http://wwf.worldwildlife.org/site/PageNavigator/SalmonSOIForm Corresponding author: Larry Hammell, email: [email protected] This report was commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue. The Salmon Dialogue is a multi-stakeholder, multi-national group which was initiated by the World Wildlife Fund in 2004. Participants include salmon producers and other members of the market chain, NGOs, researchers, retailers, and government officials from major salmon producing and consuming countries. The goal of the Dialogue is to credibly develop and support the implementation of measurable, performance-based standards that minimize or eliminate the key negative environmental and social impacts of salmon farming, while permitting the industry to remain economically viable The Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue focuses their research and standard development on seven key areas of impact of salmon production including: social; feed; disease; salmon escapes; chemical inputs; benthic impacts and siting; and, nutrient loading and carrying capacity. Funding for this report and other Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue supported work is provided by the members of the Dialogue‘s steering committee and their donors.
  • Or a Fish Meal-Based Diet on Water Quality, Waste

    Or a Fish Meal-Based Diet on Water Quality, Waste

    Aquacultural Engineering 52 (2013) 45–57 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Aquacultural Engineering journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Comparing the effects of feeding a grain- or a fish meal-based diet on water quality, waste production, and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss performance within low exchange water recirculating aquaculture systems a a b a John Davidson , Christopher Good , Frederic T. Barrows , Carla Welsh , c a,∗ P. Brett Kenney , Steven T. Summerfelt a The Conservation Fund’s Freshwater Institute, 1098 Turner Road, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, United States b United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States c West Virginia University, Division of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Feeding a fish meal-free grain-based diet (GB) was compared to feeding a fish meal-based diet (FM) Received 1 December 2011 relative to water quality criteria, waste production, water treatment process performance, and rainbow Accepted 3 August 2012 trout Oncorhynchus mykiss performance within six replicated water recirculating aquaculture systems (WRAS) operated at low exchange (0.26% of the total recycle flow; system hydraulic retention time = 6.7 Keywords: days). Rainbow trout (214 ± 3 g to begin) were fed the GB diet within three WRAS and the FM diet within Recirculating aquaculture system the other three WRAS for 3 months. Feeding the GB diet resulted in significantly greater total ammonia Alternative protein diet nitrogen (TAN) throughout the study, as well as significantly greater total suspended solids (TSS) and Sustainable Aquafeeds carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) over the greater part of the study.
  • Aquaculture Engineering

    Aquaculture Engineering

    AQU AQUACULTURE ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SECOND EDITION ODD-IVAR LEKANG AC Aquaculture has been expanding at a rate of 9% per year for more than 20 years, and is projected to AQUACULTURE continue growing at a very rapid rate into the foreseeable future. In this completely updated and revised new edition of a highly successful, best-selling and well-received book, Odd-Ivar Lekang provides the latest ULTURE must-have information of commercial importance to the industry, covering the principles and applications of all major facets of aquaculture engineering. ENGINEERING Every aspect of the growing field has been addressed with coverage spanning water transportation and treatment; feed and feeding systems; fish transportation and grading; cleaning and waste handling; and instrumentation and monitoring. Also included in this excellent new edition are comprehensive details of major changes to the following subject areas: removal of particles; aeration and oxygenation; recirculation and water reuse systems; ponds; and the design and construction of aquaculture facilities. Chapters providing information on how equipment is set into systems, such as land-based fish farms and cage farms, are also included, and the book concludes with a practical chapter on systematic methodology for planning S a full aquaculture facility. ECOND Fish farmers, aquaculture scientists and managers, engineers, equipment manufacturers and suppliers to the aquaculture industry will all find this book an invaluable resource. Aquaculture Engineering, Second Edition, will be an essential addition to the shelves of all libraries in universities and research establishments where aquaculture, biological sciences and engineering are studied and taught. E DITION ABOUT THE AUTHOR Odd-Ivar Lekang is Associate Professor of Aquaculture Engineering at the Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences in Ås.
  • Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019

    Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019

    FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA 2019 37.2’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region June 2019 Fish and Aquatic Conservation, Fish Passage Engineering Ecological Services, Conservation Planning Assistance United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA June 2019 This manual replaces all previous editions of the Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Suggested citation: USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts. USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. x List of Equations ............................................................................................................................ xi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xii 1 Scope of this Document ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Role of the USFWS Region 5 Fish Passage Engineering ............................................