Ingilizce Kitap Tiresiz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ingilizce Kitap Tiresiz TURKISH – ARMENIAN RELATIONS (1918-2008) M. Serdar PALABIYIK* Yıldız DEVECİ BOZKUŞ** Introduction he relations of Turkey with Armenia, is a rarely studied subject in the Tliterature, in general. When speaking of the relations between the two countries, the first thing that often comes to mind is the Armenian “genocide” claims, which has resulted in the undermining of the political, economic and socio-cultural dimensions of the Turkish-Armenian relations. Recently, during the period when the “genocide” claims have frequently been put in front of Turkey, Turkish-Armenian relations, especially the last ten years, has become a subject of study and some articles have been published on this issue. Nevertheless, the publications, especially concerning the relations in the early years of the establishment of Armenian Republic, have remained limited. This article is written to examine the relations between Turkey and Armenia as a whole and to analyze how these countries perceive and assess each other. In doing this, the structure of the problems between the two countries, including the “genocide” issue, and the proposals for a solution that have been developed throughout the years are examined without ignoring the roles of different political actors in foreign policy making. In other words, the aim of this article is to chronologically analyze the relations of Armenia with Turkey since the year 1918 when the Armenian state first gained its independence until today. The article is mainly composed of four parts. In the first part, the direct relations of Democratic Republic of Armenia (1918-1920) – the short-lived state that appeared on the historical scene – and the indirect relations established with Turkey after it fell under Soviet control (1920-1991) is examined. This is followed by the second part where Turkish-Armenian relations in the period of Levon Ter- Petrossian (1991-1998), the first President of the State of Armenia that again * Research Assistant, Middle East Technical University, Department of International Relations ** Coordinator, TRT External Broadcasting Divison, Multi-Language Channel Department 231 TURKISH – ARMENIAN RELATIONS (1918-2008) became an independent republic, are analyzed. The third part, which is the focal point in the article, constitutes an examination of the course of relations between the two countries in the period of Robert Kocharian, who has occupied the seat of the Armenian Presidency after Ter-Petrossian. In the final part, Turkey- Armenia relations during the period of Serzh Sarkisyan’s Presidency (2007 and after) is analyzed. As it is stated above, the article will continue in a chronological structure. However, from time to time, different dimensions of the relations between the two countries will be displayed with thematic subsections. This chronological classification is made by considering Armenian history, not Turkish history; while Turkish foreign policy with regard to Armenia exhibits continuation despite some nuances, it is possible to observe a relative differentiation with regard to political factors, especially in the Armenian Republic’s foreign policy for Turkey. Emphasis of this differentiation will be extremely useful for a better understanding of the course of relations between the two countries. This article does not claim to make a detailed analysis of all the events within this long time period. While some issues are excluded since they are not well- suited for the general course of the article, some issues are merely examined narrowly when emphasizing some periods or themes. If the transformations experienced in the relations between the two countries can be generally presented to the reader, then it can be said that this article achieves its purpose. 1. The Historical Background of the Turkish-Armenian Relations: From the Democratic Republic of Armenia to the Independence of Armenia (1918-1991) When examining Turkish-Armenian relations, it will be useful to return to the era of the first independent Armenian Republic rather than starting immediately from 1991 and to examine the historical background of the relations between the two countries by departing from this point in order to understand the subject better. For this reason, in this part, Turkish-Armenian relations from 1918 to 1991 will be analyzed on the basis of the relations of the independent governments of Armenia and the subsequent Soviet administration with Turkey. The Russian government, which was established after the October Revolution that had started in 1917 and had abolished the Tsarist regime in Russia, aimed to institute control in the periphery regions after it had gained control at the center. Within this regard, a mission that was composed of three delegates who were representing the three communities of the region (Turkish, Armenian, and Georgian) was sent to Caucasus.1 Meanwhile, the peoples of the region, who perceived the turmoil that was created as a result of the October Revolution as an opportunity, attempted to establish independent states. The convening of the Armenian National Assembly in 1917 September was one of the 1 This mission was composed of Babajanian from Armenian origin, Chengeli from Georgian origin, and Caferof from Turkish origin. See Esat Uras, Tarihte Ermeniler ve Ermeni Meselesi, İstanbul: Belge Yayınları, 1998, p. 639. 232 M. Serdar PALABIYIK - Yıldız DEVECİ BOZKUŞ examples of these independence movements. However, the revolutionaries did not initially allow for independence and established an administrative structure in the region under the name of the Caucasus Executive Assembly. They tried to prevent these separatist movements by giving the right of representation to the three major communities living in the region. The Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic was proclaimed with the establishment of this Assembly. After the proclamation of this state, a government was established among the Caucasus Executive Assembly where five of the ministers were Georgian, three were Armenian, and three were Turkish.2 Following the Russian peace proposal to the Ottoman State to quit the war, the Brest-Litovsk Treaty was signed with this state on 3 March 1918 and the Ottoman State took Kars, Ardahan, Batum and Erzurum back from the Russians. This situation led to a great conflict between the three states that formed the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. Especially the Armenians were reacting against the silence of the other two communities by claiming that the territories which the Ottomans had taken back were theirs. As a result of this disagreement, the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic was dissolved on May 1918 by seizing the opportunity while the revolutionaries were in conflict among themselves. Georgia and Azerbaijan declared independence on 26 May, and Armenia on 28 May. Thus, the Democratic Republic of Armenia, whose life lasted only in two years, was established. The Prime Minister of the Armenian Government, which was mainly composed of the Dashnaks, became Hovhannes Katchaznouni. Just after its establishment, Armenia began to come into conflict with almost all of its neighbors. It firstly attacked Georgia under the pretext of the border conflict in the Lori and Cevahati regions. When it was defeated, a ceasefire was signed between the two states with the mediation assistance of Britain. In 1919, Armenia attacked Azerbaijan this time and invaded the surroundings of Shusha; but the Azerbaijan army flung back the Armenians from the occupied territories in early 1920.3 Meanwhile the Ottoman State withdrew from Kars, Ardahan and Batum by signing the Armistice of Mudros in 1918. The Armenians seized this opportunity to attack Kars and Ardahan and capture them; they held the de facto control of the region for nearly one and a half years. Beginning from the summer of 1920, the Turkish forces under the command of Kazim Karabekir took action to put an end to the Armenian occupation. They took back Oltu on 3 September, Sarıkamış and Kağızman on 29 September; they surrounded Kars on 28 October. On 30 October they took Kars back. This was followed by the seizure of Gumru on 7 November. On 8 November, Armenians demanded peace from Kazım Karabekir who had set up his headquarters in Gumru. Following the peace negotiations that had started on 26 November, the Gumru Treaty was signed on the night between 2 and 3 December. According to 2 Uras, op. cit., p. 640. 3 Richard Hovannisian, “The Republic of Armenia.” In Richard Hovannisian (Ed.), Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times, Volume 2, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2004, p. 318. 233 TURKISH – ARMENIAN RELATIONS (1918-2008) this treaty, the Kars region would be handed back to Turkey; all the agreements that Armenia signed with the other states against Turkey would be nullified; the line lying from Aras River to Çıldır Lake would be drawn as the Eastern border; the Armenian government would not accept the Treaty of Sèvres and the treaties which were contradictory to the Turkish interests; the Armenians in Turkey and the Muslims in Armenia would enjoy the equal rights like other citizens; diplomatic relations, telegraph and telephone communications would be established between the two countries at the earliest time; the Itur and Nakhcivan cities, to which local autonomy would be granted under the guardianship of Turkey, would determine their own destiny; Turkey would give military help to Armenia if Armenia was attacked and demanded help; Armenia would not import arms; both sides would not demand war
Recommended publications
  • Agbu Armenia Newsletter Issue 16, September-October, 2011
    ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION AGBUAGBU ARMENIAARMENIA NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER Yerevan, Armenia IN THIS ISSUE ISSUE 16, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER, 2011 ♦ AGBU President awarded ARMENIAN PRESIDENT BESTOWS ORDER OF HONOR Order of Honor (p. 1) UPON AGBU PRESIDENT ON THE OCCASION OF THE ♦ Dinner in honor of His Holi- ness Karekin II (p. 2) 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIA’S INDEPENDENCE ♦ Sinan Sinanian and Sam On Friday, September 23, Armenian President Serge Sargsyan awarded AGBU pre- Simonian awarded Anania sident Berge Setrakian with the Order of Honor for his significant contributions to the Shirakatsi medal (p. 3) Republic of Armenia. The honor, one of the highest bestowed by the Republic of Ar- ♦ Alexis Govciyan and Berdj menia, was awarded Terzian awarded Mkhitar during the 20th Anni- Gosh medal (p. 3, 4) versary of Independ- ♦ AUA: 20 years of advance- ence of the Republic ment (p. 4, 5) of Armenia gala at Cipriani Wall Street in ♦ AGBU AVC celebrates 2nd Manhattan's financial year of successful operation district. (p. 6) ♦ AGBU AVC labs opened in The event, which was Rostov and Tbilisi (p. 7) attended by 700 New York-area Armenians, ♦ AGBU AVC participates in was jointly organized education conferences and by the Armenian Em- expos (p. 7) bassy in the United ♦ AGBU delegation at Arme- States, the Permanent Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan bestows Order of Honor upon nia-Diaspora conference (p.8) Mission of the Repub- AGBU President Berge Setrakian ♦ AGBU celebrates 20th anni- lic of Armenia at the versary of Armenia’s inde- United Nations, and leading Armenian-American organizations. The Order of Honor pendence (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Pashinyan Urges End to Anti- Government Protests in Artsakh
    JUNE 9, 2018 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVIII, NO. 46, Issue 4541 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF Pashinyan Meets with Pashinyan Urges End to Anti- Catholicos, Supreme Spiritual Council YEREVAN (Armenpress) — Prime Minister Nikol Government Protests in Artsakh Pashinyan visited the Mother See of Holy Echmiadzin where he met with the participants of STEPANAKERT (RFE/RL) — Armenia’s the annual meeting of the Supreme Spiritual Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Council and the Bishops’ Assembly. Monday, June 4, called for an end to anti- Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of government protests in Nagorno-Karabakh All Armenians, congratulated the prime minister (Artsakh) sparked by a violent dispute on his birthday and wished him success. Touching between security officers and other local upon the recent domestic political events in residents. Armenia, Karekin II highlighted their peaceful res- Pashinyan made what he described as a olution and stated that as a result of it the coun- “brotherly request” as about 200 people try’s and people’s reputation has increased among demonstrated in Stepanakert for a fourth the international community. He expressed confi- day to demand the resignation of the heads dence that it is possible to create a powerful, pro- of Artsakh’s two main law-enforcement gressive country by the joint work of the leader- agencies blamed for the violence. ship, the church and the people. The starting incident was a brawl that Pashinyan thanked the catholicos for the warm broke out outside a Stepanakert car wash sentiments.
    [Show full text]
  • AGBU Armenia Newsletter (April-May, 2011)
    ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION AGBUAGBU ARMENIAARMENIA NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER Yerevan, Armenia IN THIS ISSUE ISSUE 13, APRIL-MAY, 2011 ♦ Tsitsernakabert visit (p. 1) AGBU ARMENIA PAYS TRIBUTE TO THE VICTIMS ♦ AGBU “Groong” choir on tour in Armenia (p. 1, 2) OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ♦ Mr. and Mrs. Yacoubian visit the renovated library teaching On April 24th, on the occasion of the 96th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, center (p. 3) the Armenia-based structures and members of the Armenian General Benevolent ♦ Working meeting at the RA Union (AGBU), headed by AGBU Armenian Representation Director Ashot Ghaza- Diaspora Ministry (p. 3) rian, AGBU Armenian ♦ Final round of the 5th Republi- Representation Deputy can Chess Tournament (p. 4) Director Hovig Eorde- kian and AGBU Dias- ♦ AGBU continues its support of “Renaissance” festival (p. 5) pora Youth Programs Coordinator in Armenia ♦ AGBU Nork Youth Center Hermine Duzian, vis- children in Beirut (p. 6) ited Tsitsernakabert to ♦ APO presents Tchaikovsky's pay tribute to the 1,5 “Nutcracker” (p. 6) million innocent victims ♦ APO continues the series of of the Armenian Geno- university concerts (p. 7) cide. Carrying the flags ♦ Artsakh Chamber Orchestra’s of the Republic of Ar- concert dedicated to the Arme- menia, AGBU and the nian Genocide (p. 7) scout movement, mem- ♦ AGBU YP Yerevan new pro- bers of the AGBU Yer- jects (p. 8) evan Scout movement, AGBU Armenia-based structures and members visit Tsitsernakabert ♦ AGBU Yerevan Scouts’ events AGBU Young Profes- (p. 9) sionals Yerevan team, AGBU Armenia members and AGBU Armenian representa- ♦ AGBU Switzerland honors the tion staff, accompanied by the AGBU Montevideo “Groong” choir, who were on a leaders of Topalian Foundation concert tour in Armenia during that time, walked to the Genocide memorial and (p.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 16475 AM STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA HEALTH FINANCING AND PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized June 30, 1997 Public Disclosure Authorized Municipal and Social Services Country Department IV Europe and Central Asia Region CUR-RENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of May, 1997) Dram I = US$0.0021 US$1 Dram 470 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ASIF A:rmenia Social Investment Fund BBP Basic Benefits Package BoD lBurdenof Disease CAS Country Assistance Strategy CEE Central and Eastern Europe EU/TACIS Iluropean Union Technical Assistance to CIS countries ECA Europe and Central Asia FSU lFormerSoviet Union FY l'iscal Year FM/GP l'amily Medicine/General Practice GDP (iross Domestic Product GoA (iovernment of Armnenia HCE hlealth Care Expenditures IDA International Development Association IMF International Monetary Fund MCH Maternal and Child Care MoH Ministry of Health MoFE Ministry of Finance and Economy NGO Non-Governmental Organization NIH National Institute of Health OM Operational Manual PER Public Expenditure Review PHRD P'olicy and Human Resources Development Fund IJapanese Grant Facility) PHC PlrimaryHealth Care PHCDP Plrimary Health Care Development Program PIP P'roject Implementation Plan PMU PlrojectManagement Unit SAC Structural Adiustment Credit SATAC Structural Adjustment Technical Assistance Credit SHA State Health Agency SMU State Medical University TA rechnical Assistance UNDP iJnited Nations Development Program UNICEF United Nations Children Fund USAID UJSAgency for International Development WHO/EURO World Health Organization Europe Office FISCAL YEAR: January I - December 31 Vice President, Europe and Central Asia Region: Johannes Linn (ECA) Director, Europe and Central Asia Country Department IV: Basil Kavalsky (EC4DR) Chief, Municipal and Social Services Division: ThomnasA.
    [Show full text]
  • Ermeni Arastirmalari 50 Layout 1
    ÖZEL SAYI: Ermenilerin Sevk ve İskanı'nın 100ncü Yılı ERMENİ ARAŞTIRMALARI Dört Aylık Tarih, Politika ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 50sayı 2015 Seçil KARAL AKGÜN Brian JOHNSON Sina AKŞİN Birsen KARACA Leyla BUDAK Ömer Engin LÜTEM Uluç GÜRKAN Jean-Louis MATTEI Cemil HASANLI Pulat TACAR ERMENİ ARAŞTIRMALARI Dört Aylık, Tarih, Politika ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 2015, Sayı 50 YAYIN SAHİBİ Ali Kenan ERBULAN SORUMLU YAZI İŞLERİ MÜDÜRÜ Aslan Yavuz ŞİR EDİTÖR Ömer Engin LÜTEM YAZI KURULU Alfabetik Sıra İle Prof. Dr. Seçil KARAL AKGÜN Ömer E. LÜTEM (E. Büyükelçi) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin BAĞCI (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Nurşen MAZICI (Marmara Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Nedret KURAN BURÇOĞLU (Boğaziçi Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Nesib NESSİBLİ (Khazar Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Sadi ÇAYCI (Başkent Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Hikmet ÖZDEMİR (Siyaset Bilimci) Prof. Dr. Kemal ÇİÇEK (İpek Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin PAZARCI Dr. Şükrü ELEKDAĞ Prof. Dr. Mehmet SARAY (E. Büyükelçi) (Tarihçi) Prof. Dr. Temuçin Faik ERTAN Dr. Bilal N. ŞİMŞİR (Ankara Üniversitesi) (E. Büyükelçi) Dr. Erdal İLTER Dr. Pulat TACAR (Tarihçi) (E. Büyükelçi) Alev KILIÇ (E. Büyükelçi, AVİM Başkanı) DANIŞMA KURULU Alfabetik Sıra İle Ertuğrul APAKAN Dr. Ayten MUSTAFAYEVA (E. Büyükelçi) (Azerbeycan Milli Bilimler Akademisi) Prof. Dr. Edward ERICKSON Jeremy SALT (Tarihçi) Prof. Dr. Norman STONE Prof. Dr. Michael M. GUNTER (Bilkent Üniversitesi) (Tennessee Teknoloji Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Ömer TURAN Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Jean-Louis MATTEI Prof. Dr. Hakan YAVUZ (Tarihçi) (Utah Üniversitesi) Prof. Dr. Justin MCCARTHY (Louisville Üniversitesi) Ermeni Araştırmaları yılda üç kez yayımlanır. Yerel Süreli Yayın. Ermeni Araştırmaları hakemli bir dergidir. Ermeni Araştırmaları dergisi TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM tarafından taranmaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian
    MARCH 16, 2013 MirTHErARoMENr IAN -Spe ctator Volume LXXXIII, NO. 35, Issue 4280 $ 2.00 NEWS IN BRIEF The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 Top World Chess Player Praises Aronian ahead Armenian Modern Art Great Hakob Hakobian Dies Of Tournament YEREVAN (Combined Malishka” are among his best- LONDON (ArmeniaNow) — International Chess Sources) — Renowned known paintings. Federation (FIDE) current number top player Armenian painter Hakob Hakobian was laid to rest on Magnus Carlsen sees Armenia’s Levon Aronian as Hakobian died on March 9 of a Tuesday, March 12. A govern - his main rival at a Chess Candidates Tournament to heart attack. He ment commis - be open in London later this week, according to was 89. sion headed by See an editorial in The Guardian. Born in Egypt, Prime Minister appreciation, page 13 “He has supreme confidence and belief in him - Hakobian repa - Tigran Sargisian self, is very well prepared, can evaluate non-stan - triated to Soviet Armenia in was appointed to organize the dard positions very well and never backs down,” 1962, where he later earned a artist’s funeral. said the Norwegian of Aronian, who is ranked third “People’s artist” title. President Serge Sargisian by FIDE. “A Woman Frying Fish,” issued a letter of condolence Aronian and Carlsen square off in the opening “Spring,” “The Village of on the death of Hakobian, who round of the competition to be held in the British had received the title of capital from March 15 to April 1. People’s Artist of Armenia. “Hakob Hakobian’s death is a major loss for Armenia’s UK Backs OSCE Minsk artistic life.
    [Show full text]
  • Brosura-Genocidul-Armean.Pdf
    The Armenian Genocide: History, Memory, Responsibility International Conference Bucharest City Museum, Casa Filipescu-Cesianu, October 13-14, 2017 Organizers: Union of Armenians of Romania, Lepsiushaus Potsdam, Bucharest City Museum, Orbis Tertius Association Conveners: Varujan Vosganian, Rolf Hosfeld, Bedros Horasangian, Sorin Antohi The first proof of Armenian presence on the territories inhabited by Romanians is a Cetatea Albă tombstone dated 967 AD. Over time, this presence has become ever more significant. Thus, historian Nicolae Iorga was right to say that Armenians are somehow the ancestors of the medieval principality of Moldova. On the vast map of the Armenian diaspora, the Romanian lands have remained an important location ever since. In Romania’s historical mesoregion, defined by geopolitical in- stability and fluid, multiple, contested identities, many people of various, entangled backgrounds (ethnic, religious, linguistic, social) could trace back their origins to some Armenian ancestor. After the 1915 genocide, a tragic new wave of Armenian immigrants has reached Romania, and some of their descendants are still around. Rumor had it that a government of Armenia could be easily formed in interwar Bucharest by the post-genocide refugees. In recent years, worldwide attention has been devoted to the history, memory, and official recognition of the Armenian genocide. This attention has triggered a multitude of conferences and publications, research programs and civic, education- al, artistic, and media initiatives. With this in mind, an international conference is convened in Bucharest to ex- plore the history of the Armenian genocide and of its lasting consequences (with an emphasis on their conceptual and comparative dimensions), its memory (includ- ing its forgetting, denial, forgiveness, transgenerational trauma, and public signifi- cance), and the related issues of responsibility (from the ethics of memory to politi- cal recognition, from moral solidarity to retrospective justice).
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Thesis University of Trento School in Social Sciences Doctoral Program in Sociology and Social Research 25 Cycle Mayr H
    Doctoral Thesis University of Trento School in Social Sciences Doctoral Program in Sociology and Social Research 25th Cycle Mayr Hayastan Im Hairenik: Memory and the Politics of Construction of the Armenian Homeland Ph.D. candidate: Turgut Kerem Tuncel Advisor: Professor Giolo Fele Trento, June 2014 I dedicate this dissertation to my mother Fatma Tuncel and my father Bekir Hikmet Tuncel 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank to the School in Social Sciences at the University of Trento for granting me the opportunity to complete this dissertation. I would also like to acknowledge Prof.Giolo Fele for supervising my research. I would like to offer my greatest appreciation and thanks to Simon Payaslian (Boston University), Tsypylma Darieva (Friedrich-Schiller University) and Carlo Ruzza (University of Trento) for being the members of my dissertation committee and providing me with valuable criticisms and guidance. I wish to express my deepest gratitude to Gerard Libaridian and Armenian Studies Program at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, where I had been a pre-doctoral fellow in the 2011-2012 academic year. This dissertation has been a long journey during which I met many wonderful people in Ankara, Istanbul, Trento, Yerevan and Michigan. I will always remember the 24th and 25th cycle PhD candidates in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Trento with whom I shared the working space for almost two years. The people of the Studentato di San Bartolameo between October 2009 and June 2010 from different corners of the World had not been only the ones I shared the common spaces but wonderful friends that I shared joy and happiness.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 12TH CONGRESS of SOUTH-EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES BUCHAREST, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2019 Dynamiques Religieuses Entre Le Pont-Euxin Et La
    THE 12TH CONGRESS OF SOUTH-EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES BUCHAREST, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2019 POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS DYNAMICS IN SOUTH-EAST EUROPE / DYNAMIQUES POLITIQUES, SOCIALES ET RELIGIEUSES DANS LE SUD-EST EUROPÉEN Dynamiques religieuses entre le Pont-Euxin et la mer Egée dans l’Antiquité/ Religious Dynamics between the Pontos Euxeinos and the Aegean Sea in Antiquity Organisateurs/Convenors: Vasilica Lungu, Adrian Robu The list of the papers will be available soon. Urbanisation dans le Sud-Est européen à l’époque romaine / Urbanization in South-East Europe in Roman times Organisateur/Convenor: Constantin C. Petolescu The list of the papers will be available soon. La rhétorique religieuse du pouvoir à Byzance et dans le Sud-Est européen / The Religious Rhetoric of Power in Byzantium and South-East Europe Organisateurs/Convenors: Andrei Timotin, Ivan Biliarsky 1. Ivan Biliarsky (Institut de Recherches Historiques, Sofia) La rhétorique du pouvoir dans l’œuvre littéraire du patriarche Euthymius de Tarnovgrade 2. Thomas Daiber (Institut für Slavistik, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen) Allegory and Genealogy in Arguments with Jews in the 9th c. The Case of Vita Constantini-Cyrilli 3. Elena Firea (Cluj-Napoca) Holy Relics and the Legitimization of Princely Power in Moldavia (15th to 17th centuries) 4. Sashka Georgieva ((Institute for Historical Studies – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) Marriage Law and Diplomatic Marriages in Mediaeval Bulgaria 5. Ivelin Argirov Ivanov (St. Cyril and St. Methodius University, Bulgaria) Looking south: The Bulgarian Medieval Policy Towards Constantinople and Thessaloniki (8th – 14th c.) 6. Margarita Kuyumdzhieva (Institute of Art Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) The Archbishop’s Staff: Rhetoric in Images 7.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMENIAN Ctator Volume LXXXX, NO
    FEBRUARY 8, 2020 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXX, NO. 29, Issue 4622 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF PACE Concerned about Armenian, Azeri FMs End Two-Day ‘Intensive’ Talks Tension between Court, GENEVA (RFE/RL) — The foreign consecutive days in the presence of the peace; principles and elements forming PM Office ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan U.S., Russian and French diplomats co- the basis of a future settlement; and tim- STRASBOURG (PanArmenian.am) — The concluded on Thursday, January 30, heading the Organization for Security ing and agenda for advancing the settle- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe two days of fresh negotiations on the and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) ment process.” (PACE) has expressed concern over “the high level Nagorno-Karabakh conflict which offi- Minsk Group. The two ministers and the The mediators again stressed the of tension” between the Armenian Prime Minister’s cial Baku said were the “most inten- mediators shed little light on the talks in importance of “confidentiality in the Office and the Presidency of the Constitutional sive” in years. (See related editorial on an ensuing joint statement issued there. settlement process” and “the need for Court. Page 18.) The statement said that the “intensive creativity and a spirit of compromise,” “We are very concerned by the high level of ten- Zohrab Mnatsakanyan and Elmar discussions” focused on “possible next it said. sion between two State institutions in Armenia, the Mammadyarov met in Geneva for two steps to prepare the populations for see TALKS, page 3 Prime Minister’s Office and the Presidency of the Constitutional Court,” said the co-rapporteurs of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe for the monitoring of Armenia, Andrej Sircelj (Slovenia, EPP/CD) and Kimmo Kiljunen Macron Attends French-Armenian Gala (Finland, SOC) on February 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-Soviet Resettlement Policies and Their Implications for Ethno-Territorial Conflicts in the South Caucasus
    THE RUSSIAN-SOVIET RESETTLEMENT POLICIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ETHNO-TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS By Farid Shafiyev A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2015 Farid Shafiyev Abstract This dissertation investigates the Imperial Russian and Soviet resettlement policies in the South Caucasus with a focus on Azerbaijan, and their implications for the ethno-territorial conflicts in the region. The periods of 1817-1840 as well as from 1878- 1914 during Russian Imperial rule are juxtaposed to the period of 1941-1953 of the Soviet administration in the South Caucasus. The selection of this time frame is based on the most active phases of the resettlement practices carried out by respective empires in the South Caucasian borderland. According to this time period, the most affected ethnic groups involved in the Russian-Soviet resettlement policies were Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Germans and Russians. As a contribution to transhistorical studies, this dissertation seeks to find not only parallels and continuity between the resettlement policies of Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union, but also aims at analyzing the modalities and complexities of empire- building in the borderlands under investigation. Thus, the dissertation will focus on differences in methods and approaches employed by the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union as they had different ideologies in empire- and state-building, which subsequently affected their resettlement practices. The research examines the imperial tools employed for refashioning the population in the borderland, such as Christianization and the “civilizing mission” and their connection to resettlement practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Reporter
    JANUARY 10, 2015 MirTHErARoMENr IAN -Spe ctator Volume LXXXV, NO. 25, Issue 4370 $ 2.00 NEWS IN BRIEF The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 Shoah Foundation Armenian Reporter Newspaper Closes To Add Armenian MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. (Armenian Reporter) — Kathleen Cafesjian Baradaran, chair of the Genocide Survivor Cafesjian Family Foundation, announced on December 16, 2014 that “The Cafesjian Foundation Testimonies has taken a difficult decision to close the Armenian Reporter . We regret that we are forced to take this LOS ANGELES — In honor of the decision after more than eight years of publishing. upcoming 100th anniversary of the We thank our readers and all individuals who have Armenian Genocide, the University of contributed to the Reporter.” Southern California (USC) Shoah The Armenian Reporter was founded by Foundation — The Institute for Visual Edward K. Boghossian in 1967 and published in History and Education, is readying at New York City. It was sold to CS Media, of which least 40 of the nearly 400 Armenian tes - Gerard Cafesjian was a major shareholder, in timonies it has secured from the 2006. Armenian Film Foundation for inclusion in the Visual History Archive. It is antici - pated the entire collection will be inte - Azeri Incursion in NKR grated by fall 2015. The Armenian float in the Tournament of Roses on New Year’s Day USC Shoah Foundation and the Results in Deaths of Armenian Film Foundation signed an Two Soldiers agreement in April of 2010 to digitize First-Ever Armenian Float in Tournament of the interviews the late Dr. J. Michael YEREVAN (Armenpress) — The Ministry of Hagopian recorded on 16-mm film Roses Parade Wins Presidential Award Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia issued between 1972 and 2005.
    [Show full text]