In Re Victor Romm
United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division Transmittal Sheet for Opinions for Publishing and Posting on Website Will this Opinion be Published? No Bankruptcy Caption: In re Victor Romm Bankruptcy No. 05 B 46897 Adversary Caption: Pearle Vision, Inc. and Pearle, Inc. v. Victor Romm Adversary No. 06 A 69 Date of Issuance: December 13, 2006 Judge: A. Benjamin Goldgar Appearance of Counsel: Attorney for debtor Victor Romm: John O. Noland, Jr., Chicago, IL Attorneys for Pearle Vision, Inc. and Pearle Inc.: John D. Silk, Rothschild, Barry & Myers, Chicago, IL, Craig P. Rieders, Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., Miami, FL UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 ) VICTOR ROMM, ) No. 05 B 46897 ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) PEARLE VISION, INC., and PEARLE, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 06 A 69 ) VICTOR ROMM, ) ) Defendant. ) Judge Goldgar MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the court for ruling is the motion of debtor Victor Romm to dismiss the first amended adversary complaint of plaintiffs Pearle Vision, Inc. and Pearle, Inc. (collectively “Pearle”). For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss will be denied. 1. Background In deciding Romm’s motion, the court has considered both the first amended complaint and its exhibits, taking all facts alleged to be true. See Hollander v. Brown, 457 F.3d 688, 690 (7th Cir. 2006). The court has also reviewed the debtor’s petition and schedules, along with the district court’s docket and papers filed in the related action styled Pearle Vision, Inc., et al. v. Romm, et al., No. 04 C 4349 (N.D.
[Show full text]