Program Update: Year Three

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Program Update: Year Three PHYSICAL SCIENCES-ONCOLOGY CENTER PROGRAM Program Update: Year Three Fall 2012 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................1 2. Physical Sciences-Oncology Program Organization ...............................................................................................................5 2.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................7 2.2. Office of Physical Sciences-Oncology Mission ............................................................................................................7 2.3. Program History ...........................................................................................................................................................8 2.3.1 Overview of Spring 2008 Think Tank Meetings ................................................................................................8 2.3.2 Program Development and Funding History ...................................................................................................10 2.4. Strategic Approach and Objectives ...........................................................................................................................11 2.4.1 A Focus on Addressing “Big Questions” in Oncology ....................................................................................11 2.4.2 Structure of the PS-OC Network .....................................................................................................................12 2.4.3 Overall Goals of the PS-OC Program ..............................................................................................................12 2.5. Program Infrastructure ...............................................................................................................................................13 2.5.1 Introduction to the 12 PS-OCs ........................................................................................................................13 2.5.2 Organization and Policies of Individual PS-OCs .............................................................................................16 2.6. Organization and Activities of the PS-OC Network ...................................................................................................18 2.6.1 PS-OC Steering Committee .............................................................................................................................18 2.6.2 Data Sharing ...................................................................................................................................................19 2.6.3 Trans-Network Projects ..................................................................................................................................20 2.6.4 Annual PS-OC Network Investigators’ Meeting .............................................................................................21 2.6.5 PS-OC Network Working Groups ....................................................................................................................21 2.6.6 PS-OC Program Evaluation ..............................................................................................................................24 2.7. PS-OC Network Resources ........................................................................................................................................26 2.7.1 Network Bioresources ....................................................................................................................................26 2.7.2 Data Collection and Coordination ...................................................................................................................28 2.7.3 Genomic Characterization ...............................................................................................................................29 Program Update - Fall 2012 i 3. Program Performance ...........................................................................................................................................................31 3.1. Reported Scientific Outputs and Research Highlights ..............................................................................................33 3.2. Key Scientific Advancements with a Physical Sciences Perspective ........................................................................34 3.2.1 Evolution and Evolutionary Theory .................................................................................................................34 3.2.2 Physics Principles and Technologies in Cancer ..............................................................................................44 3.2.3 Information Transfer and Decoding ................................................................................................................55 3.2.4 De-convoluting Cancer’s Complexity ..............................................................................................................65 3.3. Reported Outputs of the PS-OC Network ..................................................................................................................74 3.3.1 Publications .....................................................................................................................................................74 3.3.2 Patents ............................................................................................................................................................77 3.3.3 PS-OC Related Clinical Trials ..........................................................................................................................77 3.3.4 Leveraged Funds .............................................................................................................................................79 4. PS-OC Pilot Projects ..............................................................................................................................................................81 4.1. PS-OC Center Pilot Projects ............................................................................................................................83 4.2. PS-OC Outreach Pilot Project ..........................................................................................................................93 5. PS-OC Network Projects and Activities ..............................................................................................................................101 5.1. Trans-Network Projects: Answering the “Big Questions” .......................................................................................103 5.2. PS-OC Cell Line Pilot Study .....................................................................................................................................111 5.3. “United Nations” (UN) of Cell Modulus ..................................................................................................................114 5.4. PS-OC Scientific orkingW Groups ............................................................................................................................117 5.4.1 Evolution of Drug Resistance Working Group ..............................................................................................117 5.4.2 Physics in Cancer Working Group .................................................................................................................118 5.4.3 Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Transport Working Group ................................................................................121 5.5. PS-OC Network Retreat ...........................................................................................................................................123 6. PS-OC Program Center Highlights ......................................................................................................................................125 iiProgram Update - Fall 2012 Physical Sciences-Oncology Center Programii 7. Outreach Activities .............................................................................................................................................................145 7.1. PS-OC Outreach Programs .......................................................................................................................................147 7.2. Outreach and Dissemination Working Group ..........................................................................................................154 7.3. PS-OC Investigators in the Media/Conferences ......................................................................................................157 7.4. OPSO Outreach Activities ........................................................................................................................................159 7.4.1 OPSO Website ..............................................................................................................................................159 7.4.2 OPSO Publications and Collections ..............................................................................................................160 7.4.3 Scientific Conferences ..................................................................................................................................162 7.4.4 NIH Symposiums ...........................................................................................................................................163
Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Tumor Stromal Architecture on Therapy Response and Clinical Progression
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/451047; this version posted October 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. The impact of tumor stromal architecture on therapy response and clinical progression Philipp M. Altrock*,1, Nara Yoon*,2, Joshua A. Bull*,3, Hao Wu4, Javier Ruiz-Ramírez 5, Daria Miroshnychenko1, Gregory J. Kimmel1, Eunjung Kim1, Robert J. Vander Velde1, Katarzyna Rejniak1, Brandon J. Manley1, Fabian Spill*,6, Andriy Marusyk*,1 Abstract— Advances in molecular oncology research complicated by the fact that stroma is spatially complex and culminated in the development of targeted therapies that act on heterogeneous and dynamically changing during disease defined molecular targets either on tumor cells directly (such as progression and therapy response. This lack of attention to inhibitors of oncogenic kinases), or indirectly by targeting the tumor stroma is also fully applicable to clinical diagnostics and tumor microenvironment (such as anti-angiogenesis drugs). decision-making in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), an These therapies can induce strong clinical responses, when aggressive epithelial malignancy. Despite availability of properly matched to patients. Unfortunately, most targeted targeted therapy directed against neoplastic cells directly therapies ultimately fail as tumors evolve resistance. Tumors (mTOR inhibitors) or indirectly (anti-angiogenic agents), late consist not only of neoplastic cells, but also of stroma, whereby stage ccRCC remains incurable7,8. The different stages of this “stroma” is the umbrella term for non-tumor cells and disease show distinct stromal architectures (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rosalind & Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre
    The Rosalind & Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre Annual Symposium May 6-7, 2021 McGill University Montreal (Qc) Canada Conference ! PROGRAM Table of Contents Sponsors 3 Policies 4 Welcome from the Organizing Committee 5 Program 6 Meet the Keynote Speakers 9 Abstracts 13 Research Staff Recognitions 16 The GCRC Annual Symposium, May 6-7, 2021 2 Sponsors This Symposium was made possible thanks to financial support from the Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre and McGill University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences sponsored by the Rose Wiselberg Foundation. The GCRC Annual Symposium, May 6-7, 2021 3 Policies Harassment Policy The Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre (GCRC) is committed to maintaining a positive and respectful environment at its Symposia and other events. We expect participants in our events to engage in constructive and professional discussion, in which all are valued for their scien- tific contributions and work. We value diversity, and desire that no participant should be subjected to harassment while involved in our events. For purposes of this policy, harassment means unwelcome and offensive comments or be- haviour directed to the participant's sex, race, colour, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity, disability, or other status protected under applicable law. Harassment can include, for example, unwelcome attention, comments or jokes that focus on gender differences or sexual topics and that distract from the professional topics under discussion, unwelcome advances or re- quests for dates or sexual activities, and the use of language or images that demean or degrade per- sons of particular gender, racial, ethnic, religious or national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Microenvironment Influences Cancer Cell Mechanics from Tumor Growth
    Microenvironment Influences Cancer Cell Mechanics from Tumor Growth 5 to Metastasis Deepraj Ghosh and Michelle R. Dawson Abstract cell motility can easily be combined with anal- The microenvironment in a solid tumor in- ysis of critical cell fate processes, including cludes a multitude of cell types, matrix pro- adhesion, proliferation, and drug resistance, teins, and growth factors that profoundly in- to determine how changes in mechanics con- fluence cancer cell mechanics by providing tribute to cancer progression. This biophysical both physical and chemical stimulation. This approach can be used to systematically inves- tumor microenvironment, which is both dy- tigate the parameters in the tumor that control namic and heterogeneous in nature, plays a cancer cell interactions with the stroma and to critical role in cancer progression from the identify specific conditions that induce tumor- growth of the primary tumor to the develop- promoting behavior, along with strategies for ment of metastatic and drug-resistant tumors. inhibiting these conditions to treat cancer. In- This chapter provides an overview of the bio- creased understanding of the underlying bio- physical tools used to study cancer cell me- physical mechanisms that drive cancer pro- chanics and mechanical changes in the tumor gression may provide insight into novel thera- microenvironment at different stages of cancer peutic approaches in the fight against cancer. progression, including growth of the primary tumor, local invasion, and metastasis. Quan- titative single cell biophysical analysis of in- Keywords tracellular mechanics, cell traction forces, and Cell mechanics · Deformation · Microrheology · Traction force · Epithelial to D. Ghosh mesenchymal transition (EMT) · Motility · Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Adhesion · Metastasis Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA M.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Architectural Cues Drive the Emergence of Non-Random Trafficking of Human Tumor
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/233361; this version posted December 13, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Tissue architectural cues drive the emergence of non-random trafficking of human tumor cells in the larval zebrafish. Colin D. Paula, Kevin Bishopb, Alexus Devinea, William J. Wulftangec, Elliott L. Painea, Jack. R. a d d a c Staunton , Steven Shema , Val Bliskovsky , Lisa M. Miller Jenkins , Nicole Y. Morgan , Raman Soodb, and Kandice Tannera* aLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health bZebrafish Core, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health cNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health d CCR Genomics Core, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health * Corresponding author information: Dr. Kandice Tanner; Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Building 37, Room 2132, Bethesda, MD 20892; Ph: 260-760-6882; Email: [email protected] Keywords: Cancer metastasis; organotropism; extravasation; organ intravital imaging; confined cell migration; topographical cues; tissue mechanics; tissue architecture bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/233361; this version posted December 13, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of Candidates 2017 Y C C ! OO S UUN T
    ELECTION SPECIAL SECTION FROM THE AMS SECRETARY R VO U T O E Biographies of Candidates 2017 Y C C ! OO S UUN T Biographical information about the candidates has been supplied and verified by the candidates. Candidates have had the opportunity to make a statement of not more than 200 words (400 for presidential can- didates) on any subject matter without restriction and to list up to five of their research papers. Candidates have had the opportunity to supply a photograph to accompany their biographical information. Acronyms: AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science); AMS (American Mathematical Society); ASA (American Statistical Association); AWM (Association for Women in Mathematics); CBMS (Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences); IAS (Institute for Advanced Study), ICERM (The Institute for Computational and Experimen- tal Research in Mathematics; ICM (International Congress of Mathematicians); IMA (Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications); IMS (Institute of Mathematical Statistics); IMU (International Mathematical Union); IPAM (Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics); LMS (London Mathematical Society); MAA (Mathematical Association of America); MSRI (Mathematical Sciences Research Institute); NAS (National Academy of Sciences); NRC (National Research Council); NSF (National Science Foundation); PIMS (Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences); SIAM (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics); STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics). President ety, Inaugural Class, 2012; Member, Society for Industrial Jill C. Pipher and Applied Mathematics Committee on Science Policy, Elisha Benjamin Andrews Pro- 2014–2018; American Academy of Arts and Sciences, fessor of Mathematics, Brown Elected 2015; Member, Mathematical Association of University. America, Committee on Prizes and Awards, 2015–2017; PhD: University of California, Los Subcommittee Chair, NSF-Division of Mathematical Sci- Angeles, 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Transient External Force Induces Phenotypic Reversion of Malignant
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Transient external force induces phenotypic reversion of malignant epithelial structures via nitric oxide signaling Benjamin L Ricca1†, Gautham Venugopalan1†, Saori Furuta2, Kandice Tanner2,3‡, Walter A Orellana2,3, Clay D Reber1, Douglas G Brownfield1,2§, Mina J Bissell2*, Daniel A Fletcher1,2* 1Bioengineering Department and Biophysics Program, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; 2Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States; 3Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States *For correspondence: [email protected] (MJB); [email protected] (DAF) Abstract Non-malignant breast epithelial cells cultured in three-dimensional laminin-rich extracellular matrix (lrECM) form well organized, growth-arrested acini, whereas malignant cells † These authors contributed form continuously growing disorganized structures. While the mechanical properties of the equally to this work microenvironment have been shown to contribute to formation of tissue-specific architecture, how Present address: ‡Laboratory of transient external force influences this behavior remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that Cell Biology, Center for Cancer brief transient compression applied to single malignant breast cells in lrECM stimulated them to Research, National Cancer form acinar-like structures, a phenomenon we term ‘mechanical reversion.’ This is analogous to Institute, Bethesda, United previously
    [Show full text]
  • MAA FOCUS October 2008
    MAA FOCUS October 2008 MAA FOCUS is published by the Mathematical Association of America in January, February, March, April, May/June, MAA FOCUS August/September, October, November, and December. Volume 28 Issue 7 Editor: Fernando Gouvêa, Colby College; [email protected] Managing Editor: Carol Baxter, MAA Inside [email protected] 4 ‘I can wear a math hat and a computer science hat’ Senior Writer: Harry Waldman, MAA An Interview with Margaret Wright [email protected] By Ivars Peterson Please address advertising inquiries to: [email protected] 6 Financial Information for Members is Now on the MAA Web Site By John W. Kenelly President: Joseph Gallian First Vice President: Elizabeth Mayfield, 7 It’s All About MAQ Second Vice President: Daniel J. Teague, By Kay Weiss Secretary: Martha J. Siegel, Associate Secretary: James J. Tattersall, Treasurer: 9 Letters to the Editor John W. Kenelly Executive Director: Tina H. Straley 10 Consternation and Exhilaration Director of Publications for Journals and Early Experiences in Conducting Undergraduate Research Communications: Ivars Peterson By Robin Blankenship Donald MAA FOCUS Editorial Board: 12 MathFest 2008 in Pictures J. Albers; Robert Bradley; Joseph Gallian; Jacqueline Giles; Colm Mulcahy; Michael Orrison; Peter Renz; Sharon Cutler Ross; An- 14 Report of the Secretary nie Selden; Hortensia Soto-Johnson; Peter By Martha J. Siegel Stanek; Ravi Vakil. 16 Renowned Mathematician Oded Schramm Dies in Fall Letters to the editor should be addressed to Fernando Gouvêa, Colby College, Dept. of Mathematics, Waterville, ME 04901, or by 17 In Memoriam email to [email protected]. Subscription and membership questions . should be directed to the MAA Customer 18 Joint Mathematics Meetings Service Center, 800-331-1622; email: [email protected]; (301) 617-7800 (outside U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Models of Angiogenesis
    ID: XX-XXXX; -19-0026 1 1 E Zucchelli et al. 3D angiogenesis models 1:1 H135–H143 MINI REVIEW New artery of knowledge: 3D models of angiogenesis Eleonora Zucchelli1, Qasim A Majid1 and Gabor Foldes1,2 1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK 2Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary Correspondence should be addressed to G Foldes: [email protected] Abstract Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis are complex processes by which new blood vessels are Key Words formed and expanded. They play a pivotal role not only in physiological development f angiogenesis and growth and tissue and organ repair, but also in a range of pathological conditions, f endothelial cells from tumour formation to chronic inflammation and atherosclerosis. Understanding the f 3D assays multistep cell-differentiation programmes and identifying the key molecular players of physiological angiogenesis/vasculogenesis are critical to tackle pathological mechanisms. While many questions are yet to be answered, increasingly sophisticated in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo models of angiogenesis/vasculogenesis, together with cutting-edge imaging techniques, allowed for recent major advances in the field. This review aims to summarise the three-dimensional models available to study vascular network formation and to discuss advantages and limitations of the current systems. Introduction The major role of the vascular system is to supply sufficient vessels, another type of vasculature exists, which form the levels of oxygen and nutrients to the bodily organs. lymphatic network. Lymphatic vessels are unidirectional, Naturally, any disruption to this system manifests itself blind-ended capillaries, which arise from the venous as a host of diseases including, but not limited to, stroke, vasculature, and they are also formed by endothelial peripheral artery disease and other ischaemic cardiovascular cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Architectural Cues Drive Organ Targeting of Human Tumor Cells in Zebrafish
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/233361; this version posted July 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Tissue architectural cues drive organ targeting of human tumor cells in zebrafish 2 3 Colin D. Paula, Kevin Bishopb, Alexus Devinea, Elliott L. Painea, Jack R. Stauntona, Sarah M. a a c b a* 4 Thomas , Lisa M. Miller Jenkins , Nicole Y. Morgan , Raman Sood , and Kandice Tanner 5 6 aLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National 7 Institutes of Health 8 bZebrafish Core, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome 9 Research Institute, National Institutes of Health 10 cNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health 11 12 13 * Corresponding author and Lead Contact information: Dr. Kandice Tanner; Center for Cancer 14 Research, National Cancer Institute, Building 37, Room 2132, Bethesda, MD 20892; Ph: 260-760- 15 6882; Email: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 Keywords: Cancer metastasis; organotropism; extravasation; organ intravital imaging; confined 20 cell migration; topographical cues; tissue mechanics; tissue architecture 21 22 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/233361; this version posted July 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 National Veterinary Scholars Symposium 18Th Annual August 4
    2017 National Veterinary Scholars Symposium 18th Annual August – 4 5, 2017 Natcher Conference Center, Building 45 National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute with The Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges https://www.cancer.gov/ Table of Contents 2017 National Veterinary Scholars Symposium Program Booklet Welcome .............................................................................................................................. 1 NIH Bethesda Campus Visitor Information and Maps .........................................................2 History of the National Institutes of Health ......................................................................... 4 Sponsors ............................................................................................................................... 5 Symposium Agenda .......................................................................................................6 Bios of Speakers ................................................................................................................. 12 Bios of Award Presenters and Recipients ........................................................................... 27 Training Opportunities at the NIH ...................................................................................... 34 Abstracts Listed Alphabetically .......................................................................................... 41 Symposium Participants by College of Veterinary Medicine
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Sciences Meetings and Conferences Section
    page 1349 Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences Thla calandar lists all meetings which have been approved prior to Mathematical Society in the issue corresponding to that of the Notices the date this issue of Notices was sent to the press. The summer which contains the program of the meeting, insofar as is possible. and annual meetings are joint meetings of the Mathematical Associ­ Abstracts should be submitted on special forms which are available in ation of America and the American Mathematical Society. The meet­ many departments of mathematics and from the headquarters office ing dates which fall rather far in the future are subject to change; this of the Society. Abstracts of papers to be presented at the meeting is particularly true of meetings to which no numbers have been as­ must be received at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, signed. Programs of the meetings will appear in the issues indicated Rhode Island, on or before the deadline given below for the meet­ below. First and supplementary announcements of the meetings will ing. Note that the deadline for abstracts for consideration for pre­ have appeared in earlier issues. sentation at special sessions is usually three weeks earlier than that Abatracta of papara presented at a meeting of the Society are pub­ specified below. For additional information, consult the meeting an­ lished in the journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American nouncements and the list of organizers of special sessions. Meetings Abstract Program Meeting# Date Place Deadline Issue
    [Show full text]
  • The Norbert Wiener Prize in Applied Mathematics 39
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS THE NORBERT WIENER PRIZE IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS This prize was established in 1967 in honor of Professor Norbert Wiener and was endowed by a fund from the Department of Mathematics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The prize is awarded for an outstanding contribution to “applied mathematics in the highest and broadest sense.” The award is made jointly by the American Mathematical Society and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The recipient must be a member of one of these societies and a resident of the United States, Canada, or Mexico. Citation James Sethian The Norbert Wiener Prize in Applied Mathematics is awarded to James A. Sethian of the University of California at Berkeley for his seminal work on the computer representation of the motion of curves, surfaces, interfaces, and wave fronts, and for his brilliant applications of mathematical and computational ideas to problems in science and engineering. His earliest work included an analysis of the motion of flame fronts and of the singularities they develop; he found important new links between the motion of fronts and partial differential equations, and in particular found that the correct extension of front motion beyond a singularity follows from an entropy condition as in the theory of nonlinear hyperbolic equations. These connections made possible the development of advanced numerical methods to describe front prop- agation through the solution of regularized equations on fixed grids. In a subsequent work (with S. Osher) Sethian extended this work through an implicit formulation. The resulting methodology has come to be known as the “level set method”, because it represents a front propagating in n dimensions as a level set of an object in (n+1) dimensions.
    [Show full text]