DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Northland Russell Forest and Cape Brett Report(PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Northland Russell Forest and Cape Brett Report(PDF EPA Report: Verified Source: Pestlink Operational Report for Possum, Ship rat Control in the Russell Forest and Cape Brett 12 Sep 2018 - 29 Sep 2018 27/02/2019 Department of Conservation Whangarei Contents 1. Operation Summary Operation Name Possum, Ship rat Control in Russell Forest and Cape Brett Operation Date 12 Sep 2018 - 29 Sep 2018 District Whangarei Region: Northern North Island Pestlink Reference 1819WNG01 Treatment Area Russell Forest and Cape Brett Size (ha) 7936.00 Conservation Unit Name(s) GA Id(s) Taparahaia Stream Marginal Strip 2795376 Russell Forest 2795709 Russell Forest 2797484 Deep Water Cove Scenic Reserve 2797568 Manawahuna Scenic Reserve 2797569 Te Toroa Scenic Reserve 2797570 Whangamumu Scenic Reserve 2797571 Ngaiotonga Scenic Reserve 2797602 Russell Forest 2797603 Treatment Block Details Treatment Blocks Size (ha) Grid Ref GIS Ref Cape Brett 1717.00 AV30 Russell Forest 6219.00 AW30 Contractor Name EPRO Treatment Dates Start Completion Cape Brett 12 Sep 2018 29 Sep 2018 Russell Forest 12 Sep 2018 28 Sep 2018 Target Pest Details Target Treatment Blocks Control Method Name Pests Cape Brett Possum, Pesticide Aerial Pesticide - Aerial in Cape Brett-(1) Ship rat Russell Forest Possum, Pesticide Aerial Pesticide - Aerial in Russell Forest- Ship rat (2) Conservation Outcome(s) Russell Forest Block This operation will not restore the degraded state of Russell Forest alone. It should temporarily reverse the decline of canopy and sub-canopy trees, allow a cohort of seedlings to germinate, and improve the nesting success of most forest birds for up to 2 years. A comprehensive outcome monitoring regime is not yet in place, and time does not allow pre- treatment data to be collected, however there is a commitment to put at least basic outcome monitoring in place following the operation. This regime may include:- • Nest monitoring (including non-treatment control block) • Photo points of foliar browse. • A re-measure of historic foliar browse indices Cape Brett Block At Cape Brett the operation aims to build on the work already being done to rid the headland of introduced predators. An aerial 1080 operation will significantly reduce numbers of possums and rats, enabling populations of some native species to recover and increase. In early July 2018, a team lead by Isabel Castro (Massey University) collected kiwi call count data using automated recorders. This will provide a useful baseline of information from which kiwi population changes can be tracked over time. The team also collected rat tracking and possum bite mark data as a pre-treatment index. Result Target(s) Treatment Area/Block What we got • • A Bite Mark Index Cape Brett 4%BMI (BMI) of less than 10% or a Residual Trap Catch of less than 3% (3 possums per 100 trap-nights) by 30 October 2018 • • A Bite Mark Index Russell Forest 16%BMI (BMI) of less than 10% or a Residual Trap Catch of less than 3% (3 possums per 100 trap-nights) by 30 October 2018 • • Cape Brett 0%RTI • • Russell Forest 0.6%RTI Pestlink Ref: 1819WNG01 Page 2 of 16 Date Printed: 06 Mar 2019 Outcome Targets What we got • Outcome targets have not been well defined but outcomes will be measured via Manaaki Whenua Matauranga Maori project following the operation. • Cape Brett outcomes are being measured by an arrangement with Massey University co-ordinating this work. 2. Introduction 2.1 TREATMENT AREA Non-target species Common Name Scientific Name Pig Sus scrofa Cattle Bos taurus Target benefit species Common Name Scientific Name New Zealand pigeon Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae Petroica macrocephala South Island tomtit macrocephala - Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae Threatened species Common Name Scientific Name North Island brown kiwi Apteryx mantelli king fern Ptisana salicina paua slug Schizoglossa gigantea kauri snail Paryphanta busbyi watti Geographical location The Russell Forest and Cape Brett is situated 12 km West of Kawakawa. TREATMENT BLOCK DETAILS: Treatment block Cape Brett Coastal Broadleaf. Kanuka/ pohutukawa/taraire forest with coastal Vegetation type shrubland in more exposed sites Bioclimatic zone coastal Climate characteristics: Rainfall 1200 mm Temperature: Average Summer 20.0 Average Winter 15.0 Snow level - m Pestlink Ref: 1819WNG01 Page 3 of 16 Date Printed: 06 Mar 2019 Altitude 10-362 m Cape Brett is primarily used by the public for walking and tramping. The Cape Brett track leads to the historic lighthouse which has guided in visitors for the past 100 years. There is a 23 bed DOC serviced hut which will be closed along with the track during the operation. The hut, its water catchment, and three workers huts used by the Rawhiti 3B2 Trust will all have 100 metre exclusion zones applied around Community and Iwi them. The public hut on the Cape Brett peninsula will be booked out interests by DOC from 13th August to 19 October or until the operation is complete, and an alert will be placed on the DOC website. The Cape Brett coastline is also regularly used by private boats, tourism operators and swimmers/snorkelers. Signage will be in place at known landing sites and personel will be present during the actual operation to prevent people entering the treatment area while bait is being applied. Entire peninsular is significant to most Northland Iwi. Historic sites Historic lighthouse at the northern point. Treatment block Russell Forest kauri-broadleaf forest. Towai/taraire/totara/tanakaha/kanuka Vegetation type dominant canopy types with emergent kauri and podocarp species in places. (Natural Areas of Whangaruru Ecological District 2005) Bioclimatic zone semi-coastal Climate characteristics: Rainfall 1500 mm Temperature: Average Summer 20.0 Average Winter 15.0 Snow level - m Altitude 20-430 m Walking and pig hunting are the two main recreational activities undertaken in Russell Forest. The Te Araroa trail crosses the northern end of the treatment area for a length of approximately 3.6 km and the Te Ranga Trig (northern section) track borders the treatment area for approximately 3.1 km. There is a day shelter on the Papakauri track, Community and Iwi which will have a 100m exclusion zone around it. The track itself will interests be cleared of baits following the operation. The Pukemoremore (southern section) track Extends from Punaruku Road to the Te Araroa Trail junction but is subject to a Rahui due to the presence of kauri dieback disease within the Punaruku catchment. Regardless of this, the track will be cleared of baits following the operation. Historic sites A number of Urupa are present within the treatment area 2.2 MANAGEMENT HISTORY Management history was not chosen to be shown in this operational report. This history is, however, available via Pestlink Pestlink Ref: 1819WNG01 Page 4 of 16 Date Printed: 06 Mar 2019 3 Outcomes and Targets 3.1 CONSERVATION OUTCOMES Russell Forest Block This operation will not restore the degraded state of Russell Forest alone. It should temporarily reverse the decline of canopy and sub-canopy trees, allow a cohort of seedlings to germinate, and improve the nesting success of most forest birds for up to 2 years. A comprehensive outcome monitoring regime is not yet in place, and time does not allow pre- treatment data to be collected, however there is a commitment to put at least basic outcome monitoring in place following the operation. This regime may include:- • Nest monitoring (including non-treatment control block) • Photo points of foliar browse. • A re-measure of historic foliar browse indices Cape Brett Block At Cape Brett the operation aims to build on the work already being done to rid the headland of introduced predators. An aerial 1080 operation will significantly reduce numbers of possums and rats, enabling populations of some native species to recover and increase. In early July 2018, a team lead by Isabel Castro (Massey University) collected kiwi call count data using automated recorders. This will provide a useful baseline of information from which kiwi population changes can be tracked over time. The team also collected rat tracking and possum bite mark data as a pre-treatment index. 3.2 TARGETS 3.2.1 Result Targets The result targets for the treatment area were: • • A Bite Mark Index (BMI) of less than 10% or a Residual Trap Catch of less than 3% (3 possums per 100 trap-nights) by 30 October 2018 • • 3.2.2 Outcome Targets The outcome targets for the treatment area were: • Outcome targets have not been well defined but outcomes will be measured via Manaaki Whenua Matauranga Maori project following the operation. • Cape Brett outcomes are being measured by an arrangement with Massey University co- ordinating this work. Pestlink Ref: 1819WNG01 Page 5 of 16 Date Printed: 06 Mar 2019 4 Consultation, Consents & Notifications 4.1 CONSULTATION Representatives from the nine hapu/marae have been working with the Department of Conservation (DOC) and the Northland Regional Council (NRC) to draft a 20-year forest health strategy. Twelve consultation huinga have been held on marae that surround Russell Forest over the last 18 months. The aim of the huinga was to develop the forest health strategy, seek support for the use of appropriate pest control tools including aerial 1080, and agree to a long-term governance structure to implement the forest health strategy. The last four of the twelve huinga was more focused on ratifying the use of aerial 1080 as a start point to the implementation of the 20 year strategy. The roopu (Hapu representatives) gained support for “all the available tools” to be used, including aerial 1080, for pest animal control and a Letter of Agreement was signed by the roopu and the Department of Conservation in July 2018 outlining the conditions under which the respective Hapu agreed not to oppose an aerial 1080 operation. The process for Cape Brett has been driven by the Rawhiti 3B2 Ahuwhenua Trust who administer the majority of the Cape Brett peninsula.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand
    Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS SCIENCE \REPORT 2007/06 May 2007 Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS Science Report 2007/06 May 2007 GNS Science BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Christie, A.B., Barker, R.G. 2007. Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand, GNS Science Report, 2007/06, 179 A B Christie, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt R G Barker, Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, Bucklands Beach, Auckland © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2007 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 0-478-09969-X CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................vii KEYWORDS ..........................................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 2.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS .................................7 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK......................................................................................................................9 4.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................11 5.0 DATA.........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • He Mangōpare Amohia
    He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORS Graham Hingangaroa Smith Rāwiri Tinirau Annemarie Gillies Virginia Warriner RESEARCH PARTNERS Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga EDITORIAL SERVICES Moana Dawson – Simple Media PHOTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Simone Magner – Simone Magner Photography ISBN NUMBER 978-0-473-32355-4 COPYRIGHT © Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi 2015 A report published by Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi Private Bag 1006 Whakatāne 3158 Aotearoa / New Zealand [email protected] 4 | HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NGĀ PAE O TE MĀRAMATANGA HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | 5 HE KUPU WHAKATAKI FOREWORD Rukuhia te mātauranga ki tōna hōhonutanga me tōna whānuitanga. Whakakiia ngā kete a ngā uri o Awanuiārangi me te iwi Māori whānui ki ngā taonga tuku iho, ki te hōhonutanga me te whānuitanga o te mātauranga, kia tū tangata ai rātou i ngā rā e tū mai nei. E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karangatanga maha, tēnā pa, i kaha tautoko hoki i tēnei rangahau me āna kaimahi. koutou i te āhuatanga o tēnei pūrongo rangahau, e kīa Ko te tūmanako ia, ka whai take ngā kōrero nei, kia tū nei, He Mangōpare Amohia. Kei te tangi te ngākau ki a tika ai ngā whare maha o te motu, kia tupu ora ai te ta- rātou kua hinga atu, kua hinga mai, i runga i ngā tini ngata, kia tutuki hoki ngā wawata o ngā whānau, o ngā marae o te motu.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 - NATURAL and PHYSICAL RESOURCES Section 1 – Landscape and Natural Features
    Chapter 12 - NATURAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES Section 1 – Landscape and Natural Features 12 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 12.1 LANDSCAPES AND NATURAL FEATURES Nga Hua Tawhiti Me Nga Tohu Tuturu o Te Whenua He wahi tuturu, he wahi hirahira puta noa i te rohe. Aua enei wahi e whakaitingia e nga mahi whakawehe i nga whenua. Kei a tatou te mahi kia whakauwhia enei wahi hirahira ki te ihi. Landscapes and Natural Features There are many special places which must not be diminished in any way by inappropriate development. Let us make sure that these special places always retain the qualities that make them unique. CONTEXT The over-riding characteristics of the landscapes in the Far North District are diversity and complexity. An extensive coastline with many harbours, large tracts of indigenous vegetation and a wide variety of landforms have combined with several centuries of human settlement to produce natural features and landscapes that are visually outstanding. These facets also contribute to the amenity values of landscapes that are not outstanding. In 1995, the Council commissioned a Landscape Assessment (LA4 Landscape Architects) of the whole District. This assessment identified the outstanding landscape features and landscapes, distinguishing landscapes that are coastal from those that are terrestrial, and evaluating all landscapes in terms of a sensitivity rating with seven categories. Any landscape that scored 6 or 7 on the sensitivity rating was classified as outstanding and therefore was deemed worthy of protection as required by s6(b) of the Act. The landscapes identified by the assessment are relatively large areas of terrain that have relatively consistent characteristics, whereas the landscape features are smaller elements such as volcanic peaks or prominent coastal landforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opua Marina Extension
    NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL & FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Councils, through the Joint Hearings Committee meeting held in the Copthorne Hotel, Paihia on 11, 12 and 13 August 2014, commencing at 10.00 a.m. The Joint Hearings Committee (“the Committee” or “the Commissioners”) of the Northland Regional Council and the Far North District Council was convened to hear resource consent applications lodged by Far North Holdings Limited, C/O Bay of Islands Planning Limited, PO Box 795, Kerikeri relating to dredging, reclamation and construction activities associated with a proposed extension to the Ōpua marina. The applications, made in accordance with the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the Act” or “the RMA”), were lodged with the Northland Regional Council (“NRC”) and Far North District Council (“FNDC”) and referenced as NRC Application No’s.: APP.008385.31.01 APP.008385.32.01 APP.008385.33.01 APP.008385.34.01 APP.008385.35.01 APP.008385.36.01 APP.008385.37.01 APP.008385.38.01 APP.008385.39.01 APP.008385.40.01 APP.008385.41.01 APP.008385.42.01 APP.008385.43.01 APP.008385.44.01 APP.008385.45.01 APP.008385.46.01 APP.005544.12.02 APP.005544.16.01 APP.008320.06.01 and referenced by the FNDC as RC 2140222-RMALUC PRESENT: Joint Hearings Committee, being independent hearings commissioners, appointed pursuant to section 34A of the Act by the respective Councils to hear and decide the applications, Miria Pomare, Greg Shaw and Alan Watson (Chair). APPLICANT: Far North Holdings Limited (“FNHL”) Richard Brabant, Legal Counsel Andrew Nock, Chief Executive Officer, FNHL Gregory Akehurst, Consultant Economist Ian Butt, Architectural Designer Simon Cocker, Consultant Landscape Architect Leigh Johnson, Consultant Archaeologist Grant Stevens, Consultant Civil Engineer (Coastal) Jon Styles, Acoustics and Vibration Consultant Steve Gibson, Consultant Civil Engineer (Traffic) Brett Beamsley, Consultant Oceanographer Mark Poynter, Consultant Marine Ecologist Chris Galbraith, General Manager, FNHL Jeff Kemp, Consultant Resource Management Planner.
    [Show full text]
  • Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: an Overview
    Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: An Overview March 2021 Prepared by: Dr Lily George Dr Sunitha Gowda Mr Khan Buchwald Te Tai Mahere Ngā Tai Ora CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................... i TABLES......................................................................................................................................................................... ii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................11 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................13 3. RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau .........................................................................................................14 3.2 Emergency Housing Grants (EHGs): ..................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Indigenous Vegetation and Habitats of the Far North District - Volume 1
    SIGNIFICANT INDIGENOUS VEGETATION AND HABITATS OF THE FAR NORTH DISTRICT - VOLUME 1 R4899d SIGNIFICANT INDIGENOUS VEGETATION AND HABITATS OF THE FAR NORTH DISTRICT – VOLUME 1 Contract Report No. 4899d December 2019 Project Team: Sarah Beadel - Project management Nick Goldwater - Project management, peer review Keely Paler - Report author Federico Mazzieri - GIS Lynette Deacon - GIS Prepared for: Far North District Council Private Bag 752 Kaikohe 0440 AUCKLAND OFFICE: 12 NIXON STREET, GREY LYNN, AUCKLAND 1021 P.O. BOX 46-299, HERNE BAY, AUCKLAND 1011, Ph 09-360-6083 HEAD OFFICE: 99 SALA STREET, P.O. BOX 7137, TE NGAE, ROTORUA Ph 07-343-9017; Fax 07-343-9018, email [email protected], www.wildlands.co.nz CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODS 1 2.1 Review of significance criteria 1 2.2 Collation of existing information to update site information 2 2.3 Site assessments 2 2.4 GIS assessment and site mapping 4 3. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT - AN OVERVIEW 5 3.1 Overview 5 3.1.1 Land cover 6 3.1.2 Threatened land environments 6 3.1.3 Fauna 7 3.2 Ecological districts of Far North District 7 4. INFORMATION ON EACH ECOLOGICAL DISTRICT 8 4.1 Overview 8 4.2 Ahipara Ecological District 8 4.2.1 Overview 8 4.2.2 Vegetation 9 4.3 Aupouri Ecological District 10 4.3.1 Overview 10 4.3.2 Vegetation 11 4.4 Hokianga Ecological District 13 4.4.1 Overview 13 4.4.2 Vegetation 14 4.5 Kaikohe Ecological District 16 4.5.1 Overview 16 4.5.2 Vegetation 16 4.6 Kerikeri Ecological District 18 4.6.1 Overview 18 4.6.2 Vegetation 19 4.7 Maungataniwha Ecological District 20 4.7.1 Overview 20 4.7.2 Vegetation 22 4.8 Puketi Ecological District 24 4.8.1 Overview 24 4.8.2 Vegetation 25 4.9 Tangihua Ecological District 26 4.9.1 Overview 26 4.9.2 Vegetation 27 4.10 Te Paki Ecological District 29 4.10.1 Overview 29 4.10.2 Vegetation 31 4.11 Tutamoe Ecological District 33 4.11.1 Overview 33 4.11.2 Vegetation 34 © 2019 Contract Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngā Puhi Ki Ngāpuhi a Study of Waiata from the War
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UC Research Repository NGĀ PUHI KI NGĀPUHI A STUDY OF WAIATA FROM THE WAR IN THE NORTH A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Te Reo Māori in the University of Canterbury by J. J. Tana University of Canterbury 2012 Ngā hua o Roto Contents He Kupu Whakamiha – Acknowledgements 2 Ariā – Abstract 5 Chapter 1 Te Whakatakinga – Introduction 6 He Tūtohutanga – Overview 6 Te Whakawhāititanga – Boundaries and limitations 6 Te Tāpua o te mahi – The significance of the work 7 Taku Hononga – Relationship to this study 8 Chapter 2 Te Horopakī – Background 9 Te Tuhinga – The Manuscript 9 Table 1. 10 Table 2. 11 Tā Hori Kerei – Sir George Grey 12 Te Kaitā – The Scribe 14 Chapter 3 Te Huarahi – Method 16 Table 3. 16 Te Whakatāruatanga – Transcription 16 Te Rangahau – The Search 17 Te Whakapākehātanga – Translation 17 Ngā Kōrero Taunaki – Annotations 21 Te Paenga Rangatira – Consultation 22 Chapter 4 Ngā puhi ki Ngāpuhi 24 Map 1. 24 He hari nā Nohotoka 25 He hari 27 He tangi nā Perangi 29 Map 2. 29 He hari nā Te Atua Wera 32 He tau nā Nawemata 35 He tangi nā Te Nehurere 37 He tangi nā Tarehu 39 Chapter 5 He toa nō Ngāti Toa 41 Map 3. 41 He tangi nā Te Rangihaeata 43 He tangi nā Hinewhē 47 Chapter 6 E whangawhanga nei a Whanganui 50 Map 4. 50 He tangi mō Te Uawiri mā 53 He tangi nā Tarawiri 56 Chapter 7 Karakia 58 He karakia 60 He karakia pure 62 He mākutu 65 Chapter 8 He waiata aroha 68 E tō, e te rā, ki tai
    [Show full text]
  • He Puka Aratohu Mō Te Reo Ā-Tuhi O Waikato-Tainui Me Āna Tukanga Whakamāori
    He Puka Aratohu mō te Reo ā-Tuhi o Waikato-Tainui me āna Tukanga Whakamāori Guidelines for Waikato-Tainui Conventions for Writing Te Reo Māori and Translation Processes Prepared by Pānia Papa Takatū Associates Ltd February 2018 1 Table of Contents Background ..................................................................................................................... 3 Who does Waikato-Tainui represent? .............................................................................. 3 Waikato-Tainui Māori Language Strategy - Tikanga Ora, Reo Ora (TORO) ......................... 4 1.1 An Historical Overview of Māori Language Written Conventions ................................ 6 1.2 Key People Who Influenced the Written Conventions in Waikato..............................13 1.3 Waikato-Tainui Written Conventions Survey responses ............................................17 1.4 Written Conventions Policy in Waikato-Tainui ..........................................................19 2.0 Recommended Translation Process ...........................................................................20 3.0 Recommendations ...................................................................................................22 Schedule 1 - Ngaa hapuu e 33 kei raro i te maru o Waikato-Tainui ...................................23 Schedule 2 - Ngaa marae e 68 kei raro i te maru o Waikato-Tainui ...................................24 2 Background This Style Guide aims to assist Waikato-Tainui organisations in their decision-making around written conventions
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Onsite Wastewater Disposal Design
    BAY OF ISLANDS PLANNING LIMITED 2 Cochrane Drive, Kerikeri 127 Commerce Street, Kaitaia PO Box 795 Kerikeri Phone [09] 4075253; Email – [email protected] 23 August 2021 District Services Department Far North District Council John Butler Centre Kerikeri Attention: Trish Routley Dear Trish Re: Proposed 3 lot Subdivision, 362 Waikare Road, Karetu – Our client seeks a subdivision consent to subdivide a 20.4030-hectare rural property into three new lots. The shed building west of the existing dwelling within the 10 metre building setback also requires authorisation. The application is a restricted discretionary activity under the Far North District Plan that can meet the applicable subdivision performance standards specified in the Rural Production Zone. Overall, it is concluded that any potential adverse effects on the environment would be less than minor and that the proposal can satisfy the matters over which the Council has reserved its discretion. We attach information required to be included in this application by the relevant statutory documents as follows: 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 1 • Planning Report and Assessment of Environmental Effects [Bay of Islands Planning Ltd]; • Appendix A – Record of Title; • Appendix B - Subdivision Plan, dated July 2021 [Williams & King]; • Appendix C – Onsite Wastewater Site Suitability Report, dated August 2020 [O’Brien Design Consulting] Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. Yours sincerely, Kenton Baxter Consultant Planner [Graduate] on behalf of Reviewed Jeff Kemp Director 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. The applicant, seeks a combined land use and subdivision consent to subdivide a 20.4030-hectare property at 362 Waikare Road, Karetu into three rural-residential lots.
    [Show full text]
  • Far North District Council Long Term Plan 2015-25 Issn: 1170-5205 Long Term Plan 2015 -25 Contents
    FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL LONG TERM PLAN 2015-25 ISSN: 1170-5205 LONG TERM PLAN 2015 -25 CONTENTS Page Welcome 5 Your Council 9 Council Vision, Mission, and Principles 15 Community Outcomes and Council Goals 19 Council’s Strategic Priorities 25 Planning through Performance Management 27 Key Decisions 29 Corporate Assumptions 47 30 year Infrastructure Strategy 67 Activity Groups 125 Roading and Footpaths Group 127 Stormwater Group 155 Water Supply Group 167 Wastewater Group 183 Waste Management Group 201 District Facilities Group 213 Environmental Management Group 279 Strategic Planning and Policy Group 309 Governance and Strategic Administration Group 339 Council Controlled Trading Organisation 349 Financial Strategy 353 Funding Impact Statement 373 Prospective Financial Statements and Other Information 419 Revenue and Financing Policy 439 Significance and Engagement Policy Summary 468 Statement of Accounting Policies 469 Water, Sanitary Services and Waste Management Assessment Variations 487 Audit Opinion 489 Glossary 493 LONG TERM PLAN 2015-25 4 WELCOMEWELCOME Nau mai, haere mai. Welcome to the Far North District Council’s Long Term Plan for 2015-25. The Long Term Plan is the most important document Council produces. It outlines the infrastructure and financial challenges the Council faces and its strategy for addressing these and other priorities over the next 10 years. The Long Term Plan 2015-25 is part of a series of 10-year plans which Council reviews every years as required by the Government. Each plan builds on the direction set in the previous plan, but it also takes account of how the world and our district have moved on over the last three years and the new issues and challenges we face.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry Report
    Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz T H E N G ā P U H I M A n D A t E I n Q U I R Y R E P O R t Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t h e N g ā p u h i M a n d a t e I n q u i r y R e p o r t W A I 2 4 9 0 W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 5 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The cover design by Cliff Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent interwoven development of Māori and Pākehā history in New Zealand as it continuously unfolds in a pattern not yet completely known National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. The Ngāpuhi mandate inquiry report. ISBN 978-1-86956-317-2 (pbk)—ISBN 978-1-86956-318-9 (PDF) 1. Ngā Puhi (New Zealand people)—Claims. 2. Ngā Puhi (New Zealand people)—Government relations. 3. Māori (New Zealand people)—New Zealand—Far North District—Claims. [1. Kerēme (Tiriti o Waitangi) 2. Kāwanatanga. 3. Mana whenua.] I. Title. ​ II. Ngā Puhi mandate inquiry report. 323.1199442—dc 23 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Typeset by the Waitangi Tribunal This report was previously released on the internet in 2015 in pre-publication format as The Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry Report : Pre-publication Version This edition published 2015 by Legislation Direct, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Printed by Printlink, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 19 18 17 16 15 5 4 3 2 1 Set in Adobe Minion Pro and Cronos Pro Opticals Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz CONTENTS Letter of transmittal .
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevazelanda.Pdf
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV 2003-488-000135 BETWEEN J L TINDALL & OTHERS Plaintiff AND FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: 7-9, 13-17, 20-21, 23, 27-28, 30-31 March 2006 Appearances: C R Pidgeon QC & R S Pidgeon for plaintiffs D J Heaney, D J Neutze & S H Macky for defendants Judgment: 20 October 2006 at 4.00 pm JUDGMENT OF WINKELMANN J This judgment was delivered by me on 20 October 2006 at, 4.00 pm pursuant to Rule540(4) of the High Court Rules. Registrar/ Deputy Registrar Solicitors Urlich McNab Kilpatrick, Whangarei Heaney & Co, Auckland Counsel C R Pidgeon QC, Auckland J L TINDALL & ORS V FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL HC AK CIV 2003-488-000135 20 October 2006 [1] The plaintiffs are oyster farmers in the Waikare Inlet in the Bay of Islands, New Zealand. They lease their farms from the Crown. The defendant, the Far North District Council (FNDC) is the local authority for the region, and operates the Kawakawa sewerage reticulation and treatment plant (the Kawakawa Scheme). Three outbreaks of gastro-enteritis have been linked epidemiologically to the consumption of oysters harvested from oyster farms in the Waikare Inlet; in 1994, 1999 and 2001. The oysters are believed to have been contaminated at the relevant times with norovirus, a virus which causes gastro-enteritis in humans. [2] After the 2001 outbreak of gastro-enteritis, the farms were subject to an emergency closure by Northland Health, the regional health authority. Thereafter the farms were reclassified as restricted which means that harvesting of oysters is only allowed on a limited basis.
    [Show full text]