He Mangōpare Amohia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORS Graham Hingangaroa Smith Rāwiri Tinirau Annemarie Gillies Virginia Warriner RESEARCH PARTNERS Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga EDITORIAL SERVICES Moana Dawson – Simple Media PHOTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Simone Magner – Simone Magner Photography ISBN NUMBER 978-0-473-32355-4 COPYRIGHT © Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi 2015 A report published by Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi Private Bag 1006 Whakatāne 3158 Aotearoa / New Zealand [email protected] 4 | HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NGĀ PAE O TE MĀRAMATANGA HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | 5 HE KUPU WHAKATAKI FOREWORD Rukuhia te mātauranga ki tōna hōhonutanga me tōna whānuitanga. Whakakiia ngā kete a ngā uri o Awanuiārangi me te iwi Māori whānui ki ngā taonga tuku iho, ki te hōhonutanga me te whānuitanga o te mātauranga, kia tū tangata ai rātou i ngā rā e tū mai nei. E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karangatanga maha, tēnā pa, i kaha tautoko hoki i tēnei rangahau me āna kaimahi. koutou i te āhuatanga o tēnei pūrongo rangahau, e kīa Ko te tūmanako ia, ka whai take ngā kōrero nei, kia tū nei, He Mangōpare Amohia. Kei te tangi te ngākau ki a tika ai ngā whare maha o te motu, kia tupu ora ai te ta- rātou kua hinga atu, kua hinga mai, i runga i ngā tini ngata, kia tutuki hoki ngā wawata o ngā whānau, o ngā marae o te motu. Koinei hoki te kotahi tau o te nga- hapū, o ngā iwi. Mā reira, ka whakatinana te whakataukī ronga atu o te mangōpare nei, a Parekura Horomia, o a Metekingi o Whanganui: Whāia te pae tawhiti, kia tata; Hauiti tangata, o Hauiti rohe. Haere atu rā e Pā, moe mai whakamaua te pae tata, kia tīna. rā i te mātotorutanga o te tangata. Kāti. Hoki mai rā ki a tātou te hunga ora, tēnā koutou, tēnā tātou. We cannot have a sustainable socio-economic revolution within Māori communities without a prior or simultaneous education revolution; such a revolution Nau mai, haere atu rā ngā mihi ki a koutou e aronui must build on our own models of transformation that appropriately respond to our aspirations to engage nei ki tēnei kaupapa, ko te ōhanga me te oranga o ngā with the whole world while simultaneously growing our whānau, ngā hapū me ngā iwi. Ka mihi hoki ki ngā iwi e cultural and iwi citizenship responsibilities. (Smith, 2013) whā, arā, ki a Ngāti Awa, Ngāti Kahungunu, Te Whānau-a- This research project has been undertaken with the Apanui me Ngāpuhi. Nā rātou i whakaae ki tēnei kaupa- support and research funding from Ngā Pae o te 6 | HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Māramatanga. It focused on how the emerging Māori transforming ideas with respect to Māori and iwi eco- economy must move from an over-emphasis on de- nomic development; that is, moving from the ‘concept’ scription and theory to a more even balance that also or ‘ideas’ level to the ‘practical enactment’. Second, how accentuates enactment and practice. core intervention elements identified in successful prac- tice models (and the literature) might become more Our thanks to the participating iwi and organisations, portable and therefore transferable across different sites and our researchers, namely: of Māori and iwi need. In this sense, our concern is the more universal issue of how good ideas are ‘bought • Ngāti Awa: Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa, Jeremy into’ by the population at large, or put another way, Gardiner1, Leonie Simpson, Dayle Hunia, Dr Joe how might we shift from an over-emphasis on ‘expert’, Mason, Enid Ratahi-Pryor, Mate Heitia; ‘top down’ change models, to more inclusive, participa- • Ngāti Kahungunu: Ngāti Kahungunu Iwi tory ‘buy-in’ from the very communities for whom the Incorporated, Kahungunu Asset Holding Company changes are purportedly developed. Ltd, Kahungunu Economic Development Board, Jodie Hamilton, Rawinia Kamau (Programme While all iwi that we examined understood the ‘colo- Manager); nising’ potential of uncritically accepting western eco- • Te Whānau-a-Apanui: Te Rūnanga o Te Whānau, nomic models, most did not have confidence in shifting Rikirangi Gage, Rob Whitbourne; away from the old ‘patronising’ models of development. • Ngāpuhi: Te Rūnanga-ā-iwi o Ngāpuhi, Tame Te These forms of colonial development have been chal- Rangi, George Riley, Karleen Everitt, Dr Te Tuhi lenged, for example, within the critiques of Pacific Island Robust; scholars (Halapua, 1993). A key issue for Māori and iwi is • Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga: Daniel Patrick, Dr for greater self-determining influence over the models of Marilyn Brewin, Dr Joseph Te Rito, Dr Dan Hikuroa, development that they utilise, and to ensure that these Professor Charles Te Ahukaramū Royal, Associate models appropriately reflect not only their economic Professor Tracey McIntosh, Sir Tipene O’Regan; interests but also their social and cultural development • Researchers: Richard Jefferies, Dr Lyn Carter, Dr aspirations. The power to self-develop is a key strategy. Mereana Barrett. Māori already have some experience in the education arena around the enactment of self-development, as A key consideration of this overall programme has been seen for example in the alternative education revolution the need to shift from narrow conceptions of iwi eco- initiated with the Kōhanga Reo movement in 1982. A nomic development – for example, an over-emphasis key element in the success of this initiative was the up- on the metrics of wealth creation and subsequent de- take of the ‘language nest’ idea by Māori more generally, scriptive analyses of the pathologies derived from high and by iwi, hapū and whānau. A constant concern since and disproportionate levels of social and economic un- its beginning has been the potential domestication of derdevelopment of Māori and iwi. We argue for a more the intervention promise of this alternative education intentional emphasis on transforming outcomes that and schooling movement by dominant Pākehā ‘cultural embrace the interconnected themes of economic, so- interests’, and its subsequent diminishment by incorpo- cial and cultural development as the basis for improv- ration into the ‘status quo’ system and structures. To em- ing Māori and iwi well-being. This project examines phasise the point we are making here – there is a need ‘best practice’ insights from four iwi and also canvasses a to get beyond shallow, descriptive accounts of the Māori broad range of literature on these matters. economy. Self-development strategies and models need to be defended at the levels of both theory (logic) Our interest in the notion of the evolving Māori econ- and practice (implementation). Moreover we need to omy is twofold. First, the practical implementation of give more attention to its enactment, its ownership by the people, and therefore its transforming potential of the persisting high and disproportionate levels of Māori social, economic and cultural underdevelopment. 1 We acknowledge the initial work of Jeremy Gardiner, who at the time was the Chief Executive Officer of Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa, and was subsequently appointed to a new position in another organisation. An important issue for self-development of iwi has been HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | 7 to ensure that the governance of the iwi, and therefore within their own culturally defined parameters, as op- control by iwi, was maintained and not totally devolved posed to relying on borrowing narrowly defined models to sub-groups such as economic sub-committees. An of economic development that are usually working to issue here is the capacity and capability of the govern- reproduce dominant cultural expectations and inter- ance group itself and the necessity to have economic ests. To be more precise, existing economic models do expertise at the rūnanga level, in order to maintain an not fully embrace Māori or iwi expectations in regard to authority and direction over those responsible for grow- what might count as being important or relevant. In ing and sustaining the wealth of the iwi. Put more suc- this sense, Māori and iwi expectations are not simply fo- cinctly, we raise the concern of insufficient attention by cused on the bottom line; they are also simultaneously some iwi leadership to social and cultural outcomes for focused on the impacts on the people and culture. The its iwi members versus a narrowly defined accent on the bottom-line calculation must also be considered against metrics associated with wealth creation. While all areas its impact on the people. When economic, cultural and (economic, social and cultural development) were con- social outcomes of success are attained as ‘joint out- sidered important – in some contexts the potential for comes’ then we are more likely to be achieving Māori the ‘trickle down impact’ of wealth into supporting the well-being. social and cultural domains was neither clear nor articu- lated coherently. This research brings together multiple sets of informa- tion from iwi interviews, observations, policy docu- We draw attention to the purpose of this research pro- ments, other research reports and literature sources to gramme – transforming Māori/iwi economic develop- enable the projection of a potential futures framework. ment – and argue the need to be critically reflective The futures framework is three-dimensional, and calls for about all of these terms and ‘what counts’ in terms of the simultaneous consideration of economic, social and their meanings. While we ought to critically understand cultural impact as part of both implementing strategic what we mean by each of these individual terms, there intervention, and monitoring what has been engaged are further complications created by different combi- (and what has not).