4.0 Onsite Wastewater Disposal Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.0 Onsite Wastewater Disposal Design BAY OF ISLANDS PLANNING LIMITED 2 Cochrane Drive, Kerikeri 127 Commerce Street, Kaitaia PO Box 795 Kerikeri Phone [09] 4075253; Email – [email protected] 23 August 2021 District Services Department Far North District Council John Butler Centre Kerikeri Attention: Trish Routley Dear Trish Re: Proposed 3 lot Subdivision, 362 Waikare Road, Karetu – Our client seeks a subdivision consent to subdivide a 20.4030-hectare rural property into three new lots. The shed building west of the existing dwelling within the 10 metre building setback also requires authorisation. The application is a restricted discretionary activity under the Far North District Plan that can meet the applicable subdivision performance standards specified in the Rural Production Zone. Overall, it is concluded that any potential adverse effects on the environment would be less than minor and that the proposal can satisfy the matters over which the Council has reserved its discretion. We attach information required to be included in this application by the relevant statutory documents as follows: 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 1 • Planning Report and Assessment of Environmental Effects [Bay of Islands Planning Ltd]; • Appendix A – Record of Title; • Appendix B - Subdivision Plan, dated July 2021 [Williams & King]; • Appendix C – Onsite Wastewater Site Suitability Report, dated August 2020 [O’Brien Design Consulting] Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. Yours sincerely, Kenton Baxter Consultant Planner [Graduate] on behalf of Reviewed Jeff Kemp Director 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. The applicant, seeks a combined land use and subdivision consent to subdivide a 20.4030-hectare property at 362 Waikare Road, Karetu into three rural-residential lots. The site is legally described as Lot 1 DP 168314. A copy of the Record of Title is attached at Appendix A. 2. The site contains an existing dwelling on proposed Lot 1 that is to be retained as the applicant’s residence. The site has been used for farming on what can be called a very small scale. 3. The application is a restricted discretionary activity subdivision under the Far North District Plan, which complies with the minimum alternate subdivision standards for the Rural Production zone. It is concluded that any potential adverse effects arising from the subdivision would be less than minor and that the proposal reflects an anticipated pattern of development that is enabled by the District Plan. Figure 1: Site Location Source: Prover Aerial 2.0 SITE AND LOCALITY DESCRIPTION 4. The application site has frontage to Waikare Road. The property is approximately 5 kilometres from Kawakawa. There is an existing dwelling and ancillary sheds at the northern end of the property near the road. The site has been used for farming. 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 1 5. The topography of the site includes rolling hills with large pastoral paddocks and pockets of plantation forestry and indigenous vegetation surrounding and interspersed within the application site. 6. The site features include an existing dwelling and ancillary sheds that would be contained within proposed Lot 1 except for one shed in Lot 3. Bush areas are a feature throughout the site, with vegetation located along the north boundary and near the southern boundary. There is also an area of pine trees near the middle of the property. The property is currently used for farming and also has a small homebased table grape growing area near the dwellings. 7. The surrounding area is Rural Production zoned land predominantly comprising of pastoral farming properties. 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Subdivision 8. The proposed subdivision would create three rural lots from a parent lot (Lot 1 DP 168314) established 23 August 1995 as follows: • Lot 1 – 2.0084 hectares • Lot 2 – 2.1504 hectares • Lot 3 –16.2630 hectares 9. A copy of the proposed subdivision plan is attached at Appendix B to this application. 10. The existing dwelling, shed and small orchard area would remain with Lot 1. Lot 2 would be furthest northeast also with frontage onto Waikare Road. Lot 3 would comprise the entire southern part of the property and has a much larger land area than the other properties. 11. Vehicle access to all of the proposed Lots will be via the existing crossing and driveway off Waikare Road. The RoW along the western and southern boundary of proposed Lot 1, will provide the necessary access to Lot 2 and 3. Along with the RoW, the necessary easements for electricity, telecommunication and computer media to all Lots is proposed. 12. Telecom and electricity services are available to the site, it is assumed additional connections can be provided for by Top Energy and Chorus. 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 2 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 3 4.0 REASONS FOR CONSENT Far North District Plan 13. Under the Far North District Plan, the site is zoned ‘Rural Production’ (RPZ). The site is also partially within the Coastal Environment and has a small area defined as Outstanding Natural Character on the north-western corner of the property. Parts of the property particularly along the northern, western and southern boundaries are within the Coastal Flood Hazard Zone (current), 50-year, 100 year and the 100 year + Rapid Sea Level Rise Scenario. A small area along the western boundary is also within the “flood susceptible land” area. The west of the property is defined as an orange tsunami evacuation zone with the remainder a yellow zone and a small area defined as safe towards the south east. FNDC Operative District Plan Maps – Rural Production Zone 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 4 NRC RPS Map – Coastal Environment and Outstanding Natural Character 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 5 NRC Natural Hazards Map – Coastal Environment and Outstanding Natural Character 14. Chapter 13 Subdivision Rules 13.7.2.1(i) ‘Allotment Sizes, Dimensions and Other Standards’ and Rule 13.7.8 ‘Restricted Discretionary Activities’ provide for alternate subdivision outcomes on sites existing as at or prior to 28 April 2000 as follows: • Rule 13.3.7.2.1(i)(3) - A maximum of 3 lots with a minimum site size of 4,000m2 and a balance lot of not less than 4 hectares; or • Rule 13.3.7.2.1(i)(4) - A maximum of 5 lots with a minimum site size of 2 hectares 15. In respect of this application, subdivision of a lot existing prior to 28 April 2000 [ issued 23 August 1995 ] as a restricted discretionary activity is applied for under Rule 13.3.7.2.1(i)(3). 16. The subdivision proposal is subject to other performance standards as set out in Table 1 below: 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 6 Table 1 - Subdivision Performance Standards Performance Standard Comment Rule 13.7.2.2 – Allotment The proposed subdivision would achieve the required 30m x dimensions 30m square building envelopes within all of the three lots exclusive of the setback requirements. Rule 13.7.2.3 -Amalgamation Not applicable of land in a rural zone with land in an urban or coastal zone Rule 13.7.2.4 – Lots divided by Not applicable zone boundaries Rule 13.7.2.5 - Not applicable Sites divided by an outstanding landscape, outstanding landscape feature or outstanding natural feature Rule 13.7.2.6 – Activities, Not applicable Utilities, Roads and Reserves Rule 13.7.2.7 – Savings as to Not applicable previous approvals Rule 13.7.2.8 – Proximity to Not applicable Top Energy transmission lines Rule 13.7.2.9 – Proximity to Not applicable National Grid Table 2 - Subdivision Rule 13.7.3 Matters Performance Standard Comment 362 Waikare Road, Karetu August 2021 Page 7 Rule 13.7.3.1 – Property Vehicle access to all of the proposed Lots will be via the existing Access crossing and driveway off Waikare Road. Rule 13.7.3.2 - Natural and The site is not within any identified District Plan hazard area but other Hazards is within hazard areas identified by the NRC Hazard maps. Parts of the property particularly along the northern, western and southern boundaries are within the Coastal Flood Hazard Zone (current), 50-year, 100 year and the 100 year + Rapid Sea Level Rise Scenario. A small area along the western boundary is also within the “flood susceptible land” area. The west of the property is defined as an orange tsunami evacuation zone with the remainder a yellow zone and a small area defined as safe towards the southeast. Development of the site would not be restricted in terms of any identified subsidence hazard under s106 of the Resource Management Act. The existing dwelling is outside flood hazard areas and further dwellings on the proposed Lots can be located outside of these areas. Rule 13.7.3.3 - Water Supply The Lots will be self-sufficient in terms of water supply. This can be addressed at the time of building consent for the vacant Lots. Rule 13.7.3.4 - Stormwater 15% Impermeable surfaces within the Rural Production zone Disposal is permitted. Existing development on proposed Lot 1 can meet this standard and the other proposed Lots are mostly vacant in terms of impermeable areas (See Appendix C). Rule 13.7.3.5 - Sanitary The wastewater report provided by O’Brien Design Consulting Sewage Disposal details this aspect of the proposed subdivision. (See Appendix C). Rule 13.7.3.6 - Energy Supply It is assumed additional connections can be accommodated by Top Energy for the proposed Lots. Rule 13.7.3.7 - It is assumed additional connections can be accommodated Telecommunications by Chorus for the proposed Lots.
Recommended publications
  • Document 2 Contributors
    DOCUMENT 2 CONTRIBUTORS Architects and Builders: Health: Barnaby Bennett, Architect Northland DHB Harnett Building Tiaho Trust NZ Institute of Building Maoridom: Arts: Elizabeth Ellis and Patu Hohepa Hamish Keith Hihiaua Cultural Centre Trust, Richard Drake Barnaby Weir, Musician Maori Advisory Panel, Elizabeth Ellis Jenny Bennett Group, Artists Te Huinga, Pita Tipene Paul McLaney, Mushroom Music Steve Moase, Artist and Musician Sport: Dianne Swann - Musician Activ8 Business: Northland Football League Sport Northland Advantage Business Northland Andrew Garratt, Human Resources Manager Stats and Surveys: Northland Chamber of Commerce Golden Kiwi Holdings Holiday Park Stats Northland Economic Action Group Legacy of Hundertwasser in Kawakawa Sir Michael Hill Survey report for Cruise NZ Webb Ross Lawyers Te Taitokerau Teachers Survey Whangarei Economic Development Group Latest Media Release Cruise NZ_ 30-09-2014 Whangarei CBD Hospitality Group Photgraphic Parking Survey_C King World of Decor Burning Issues Gallery - Jan Twentyman Tourism: Northland Branch Hospitality NZ Jane Scripps, B&B manager Marsden Woods Inskip Smith - Lawyers Positively Wellington Shorestone - Consultants Sir Bob Harvey Hospitality Northland Top Ten Holiday Park, Kevin and Linda Lloyd Tourism Bay of Plenty Education: Tourism N.Z. Adrian Smith, Principals Association Whangarei Visitors Group Julia Parry, Teacher Tourism Industry Association People Potential Pompellier College students Under 40’s: Whangarei Boys High School Board of Trustees Ben Tomason Group Taleesha
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand
    Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS SCIENCE \REPORT 2007/06 May 2007 Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS Science Report 2007/06 May 2007 GNS Science BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Christie, A.B., Barker, R.G. 2007. Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand, GNS Science Report, 2007/06, 179 A B Christie, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt R G Barker, Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, Bucklands Beach, Auckland © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2007 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 0-478-09969-X CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................vii KEYWORDS ..........................................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 2.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS .................................7 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK......................................................................................................................9 4.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................11 5.0 DATA.........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • He Mangōpare Amohia
    He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORS Graham Hingangaroa Smith Rāwiri Tinirau Annemarie Gillies Virginia Warriner RESEARCH PARTNERS Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga EDITORIAL SERVICES Moana Dawson – Simple Media PHOTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Simone Magner – Simone Magner Photography ISBN NUMBER 978-0-473-32355-4 COPYRIGHT © Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi 2015 A report published by Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi Private Bag 1006 Whakatāne 3158 Aotearoa / New Zealand [email protected] 4 | HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT He Mangōpare Amohia STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NGĀ PAE O TE MĀRAMATANGA HE MANGŌPARE AMOHIA – STRATEGIES FOR MĀORI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | 5 HE KUPU WHAKATAKI FOREWORD Rukuhia te mātauranga ki tōna hōhonutanga me tōna whānuitanga. Whakakiia ngā kete a ngā uri o Awanuiārangi me te iwi Māori whānui ki ngā taonga tuku iho, ki te hōhonutanga me te whānuitanga o te mātauranga, kia tū tangata ai rātou i ngā rā e tū mai nei. E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karangatanga maha, tēnā pa, i kaha tautoko hoki i tēnei rangahau me āna kaimahi. koutou i te āhuatanga o tēnei pūrongo rangahau, e kīa Ko te tūmanako ia, ka whai take ngā kōrero nei, kia tū nei, He Mangōpare Amohia. Kei te tangi te ngākau ki a tika ai ngā whare maha o te motu, kia tupu ora ai te ta- rātou kua hinga atu, kua hinga mai, i runga i ngā tini ngata, kia tutuki hoki ngā wawata o ngā whānau, o ngā marae o te motu.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Fallen Plumage': a History of Puhipuhi, 1865-2015
    Wai 1040, #A61 ‘Fallen Plumage’: A history of Puhipuhi, 1865-2015 Mark Derby A report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry (Wai 1040) August 2016 Mark Derby, Fallen Plumage’: A History of Puhipuhi, 1865 – 2015 A The Author Tēnā koutou. My name is Mark Derby. I am a Pākehā of Irish descent, living in Wellington. I hold a Masters in New Zealand Studies, with honours in history and te reo Māori, awarded ‘with distinction’ by the Stout Centre for New Zealand Studies, Victoria University of Wellington. My thesis examined the 1916 arrest of Rua Kēnana by Police Commissioner John Cullen, who was formerly superintendent of the North Auckland police district, in which the Puhipuhi blocks lie. This was later published as The Prophet and the Policeman: the story of Rua Kenana and John Cullen (Nelson: Craig Potton, 2009). I was employed at the Waitangi Tribunal as a researcher and claims facilitator from 2003 to 2007. During that time I completed a commissioned scoping report, ‘‘Undisturbed Possession’ – Te Tiriti o Waitangi and East Coast Maori, 1840 – 1865’ (Wai 900, #A11). I have also worked for the Ministry for Culture and Heritage as a writer on Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand and have published widely on historical issues, both in this country and overseas.1 My research has also appeared in the form of conference papers and peer-reviewed journal articles, and contributions to films, TV series and museum exhibitions on New Zealand history.2 Each of these projects has drawn extensively on unpublished archival as well as secondary research sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 - NATURAL and PHYSICAL RESOURCES Section 1 – Landscape and Natural Features
    Chapter 12 - NATURAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES Section 1 – Landscape and Natural Features 12 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 12.1 LANDSCAPES AND NATURAL FEATURES Nga Hua Tawhiti Me Nga Tohu Tuturu o Te Whenua He wahi tuturu, he wahi hirahira puta noa i te rohe. Aua enei wahi e whakaitingia e nga mahi whakawehe i nga whenua. Kei a tatou te mahi kia whakauwhia enei wahi hirahira ki te ihi. Landscapes and Natural Features There are many special places which must not be diminished in any way by inappropriate development. Let us make sure that these special places always retain the qualities that make them unique. CONTEXT The over-riding characteristics of the landscapes in the Far North District are diversity and complexity. An extensive coastline with many harbours, large tracts of indigenous vegetation and a wide variety of landforms have combined with several centuries of human settlement to produce natural features and landscapes that are visually outstanding. These facets also contribute to the amenity values of landscapes that are not outstanding. In 1995, the Council commissioned a Landscape Assessment (LA4 Landscape Architects) of the whole District. This assessment identified the outstanding landscape features and landscapes, distinguishing landscapes that are coastal from those that are terrestrial, and evaluating all landscapes in terms of a sensitivity rating with seven categories. Any landscape that scored 6 or 7 on the sensitivity rating was classified as outstanding and therefore was deemed worthy of protection as required by s6(b) of the Act. The landscapes identified by the assessment are relatively large areas of terrain that have relatively consistent characteristics, whereas the landscape features are smaller elements such as volcanic peaks or prominent coastal landforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opua Marina Extension
    NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL & FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Councils, through the Joint Hearings Committee meeting held in the Copthorne Hotel, Paihia on 11, 12 and 13 August 2014, commencing at 10.00 a.m. The Joint Hearings Committee (“the Committee” or “the Commissioners”) of the Northland Regional Council and the Far North District Council was convened to hear resource consent applications lodged by Far North Holdings Limited, C/O Bay of Islands Planning Limited, PO Box 795, Kerikeri relating to dredging, reclamation and construction activities associated with a proposed extension to the Ōpua marina. The applications, made in accordance with the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the Act” or “the RMA”), were lodged with the Northland Regional Council (“NRC”) and Far North District Council (“FNDC”) and referenced as NRC Application No’s.: APP.008385.31.01 APP.008385.32.01 APP.008385.33.01 APP.008385.34.01 APP.008385.35.01 APP.008385.36.01 APP.008385.37.01 APP.008385.38.01 APP.008385.39.01 APP.008385.40.01 APP.008385.41.01 APP.008385.42.01 APP.008385.43.01 APP.008385.44.01 APP.008385.45.01 APP.008385.46.01 APP.005544.12.02 APP.005544.16.01 APP.008320.06.01 and referenced by the FNDC as RC 2140222-RMALUC PRESENT: Joint Hearings Committee, being independent hearings commissioners, appointed pursuant to section 34A of the Act by the respective Councils to hear and decide the applications, Miria Pomare, Greg Shaw and Alan Watson (Chair). APPLICANT: Far North Holdings Limited (“FNHL”) Richard Brabant, Legal Counsel Andrew Nock, Chief Executive Officer, FNHL Gregory Akehurst, Consultant Economist Ian Butt, Architectural Designer Simon Cocker, Consultant Landscape Architect Leigh Johnson, Consultant Archaeologist Grant Stevens, Consultant Civil Engineer (Coastal) Jon Styles, Acoustics and Vibration Consultant Steve Gibson, Consultant Civil Engineer (Traffic) Brett Beamsley, Consultant Oceanographer Mark Poynter, Consultant Marine Ecologist Chris Galbraith, General Manager, FNHL Jeff Kemp, Consultant Resource Management Planner.
    [Show full text]
  • Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: an Overview
    Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: An Overview March 2021 Prepared by: Dr Lily George Dr Sunitha Gowda Mr Khan Buchwald Te Tai Mahere Ngā Tai Ora CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................... i TABLES......................................................................................................................................................................... ii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................11 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................13 3. RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau .........................................................................................................14 3.2 Emergency Housing Grants (EHGs): ..................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Northland Russell Forest and Cape Brett Report(PDF
    EPA Report: Verified Source: Pestlink Operational Report for Possum, Ship rat Control in the Russell Forest and Cape Brett 12 Sep 2018 - 29 Sep 2018 27/02/2019 Department of Conservation Whangarei Contents 1. Operation Summary Operation Name Possum, Ship rat Control in Russell Forest and Cape Brett Operation Date 12 Sep 2018 - 29 Sep 2018 District Whangarei Region: Northern North Island Pestlink Reference 1819WNG01 Treatment Area Russell Forest and Cape Brett Size (ha) 7936.00 Conservation Unit Name(s) GA Id(s) Taparahaia Stream Marginal Strip 2795376 Russell Forest 2795709 Russell Forest 2797484 Deep Water Cove Scenic Reserve 2797568 Manawahuna Scenic Reserve 2797569 Te Toroa Scenic Reserve 2797570 Whangamumu Scenic Reserve 2797571 Ngaiotonga Scenic Reserve 2797602 Russell Forest 2797603 Treatment Block Details Treatment Blocks Size (ha) Grid Ref GIS Ref Cape Brett 1717.00 AV30 Russell Forest 6219.00 AW30 Contractor Name EPRO Treatment Dates Start Completion Cape Brett 12 Sep 2018 29 Sep 2018 Russell Forest 12 Sep 2018 28 Sep 2018 Target Pest Details Target Treatment Blocks Control Method Name Pests Cape Brett Possum, Pesticide Aerial Pesticide - Aerial in Cape Brett-(1) Ship rat Russell Forest Possum, Pesticide Aerial Pesticide - Aerial in Russell Forest- Ship rat (2) Conservation Outcome(s) Russell Forest Block This operation will not restore the degraded state of Russell Forest alone. It should temporarily reverse the decline of canopy and sub-canopy trees, allow a cohort of seedlings to germinate, and improve the nesting success of most forest birds for up to 2 years. A comprehensive outcome monitoring regime is not yet in place, and time does not allow pre- treatment data to be collected, however there is a commitment to put at least basic outcome monitoring in place following the operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing the Far-Reaching Ecological Impacts of Human-Induced Terrigenous Sedimentation on Shallow Marine Ecosystems in a Northern-New Zealand Embayment
    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research ISSN: 0028-8330 (Print) 1175-8805 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20 Reviewing the far-reaching ecological impacts of human-induced terrigenous sedimentation on shallow marine ecosystems in a northern-New Zealand embayment John D. Booth To cite this article: John D. Booth (2020): Reviewing the far-reaching ecological impacts of human-induced terrigenous sedimentation on shallow marine ecosystems in a northern- New Zealand embayment, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2020.1738505 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2020.1738505 View supplementary material Published online: 18 Mar 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzm20 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2020.1738505 REVIEW ARTICLE Reviewing the far-reaching ecological impacts of human- induced terrigenous sedimentation on shallow marine ecosystems in a northern-New Zealand embayment John D. Booth Private Researcher, Russell, New Zealand ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Human settlement in Bay of Islands, New Zealand, beginning ∼1300 Received 6 June 2019 AD, wrought immense, conspicuous and enduring change to local Accepted 3 March 2020 shallow-water marine ecologies, this review addressing those HANDLING EDITOR transformations attributable to increased rates of Conrad Pilditch anthropogenically induced, land-derived sedimentation. Elevated silt inflow, particularly after the late-1800s, in course led to ∼130% KEYWORDS expansion in mangrove (Avicennia marina) cover, with Bay of Islands; cockle; estuary; concomitant loss of saltmarsh, uppershore coarse-shell beaches/ mangrove; saltmarsh; cheniers, and (probably) intertidal seagrass (Zostera muelleri).
    [Show full text]
  • Dog Management Policy 2018(PDF, 5MB)
    Document number A1903478 Background The Dog Control Act 1996 (the Act) section 10 requires Council to adopt a policy on dogs. This Policy has been developed in accordance with the Act. As per section 10(4) of the Dog Control Act 1996, in adopting this policy, Council must have regard to: a) the need to minimise danger, distress, and nuisance to the community generally; and b) the need to avoid the inherent danger in allowing dogs to have uncontrolled access to public places that are frequented by children, whether or not the children are accompanied by adults; and c) the importance of enabling, to the extent that is practicable, the public (including families) to use streets and public amenities without fear of attack or intimidation by dogs; and d) the exercise and recreational needs of dogs and their owners. The Council recognises that the majority of dog owners are responsible and that most interaction between dogs and the public is positive. This policy aims to achieve a balance between the control of dogs and recognition of the health benefits of dog ownership. The policy also aims to keep dogs as a positive part of Far North Communities by maintaining opportunities for dog owners to take their dogs into public places, while adopting measures to minimise any inherent problems caused by dogs. As well as protecting the safety of our community and recognising that dog owners are responsible for the exercise of their dogs, Council also recognises the need to protect other animals including wildlife, and significant habitats of indigenous fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Indigenous Vegetation and Habitats of the Far North District - Volume 1
    SIGNIFICANT INDIGENOUS VEGETATION AND HABITATS OF THE FAR NORTH DISTRICT - VOLUME 1 R4899d SIGNIFICANT INDIGENOUS VEGETATION AND HABITATS OF THE FAR NORTH DISTRICT – VOLUME 1 Contract Report No. 4899d December 2019 Project Team: Sarah Beadel - Project management Nick Goldwater - Project management, peer review Keely Paler - Report author Federico Mazzieri - GIS Lynette Deacon - GIS Prepared for: Far North District Council Private Bag 752 Kaikohe 0440 AUCKLAND OFFICE: 12 NIXON STREET, GREY LYNN, AUCKLAND 1021 P.O. BOX 46-299, HERNE BAY, AUCKLAND 1011, Ph 09-360-6083 HEAD OFFICE: 99 SALA STREET, P.O. BOX 7137, TE NGAE, ROTORUA Ph 07-343-9017; Fax 07-343-9018, email [email protected], www.wildlands.co.nz CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODS 1 2.1 Review of significance criteria 1 2.2 Collation of existing information to update site information 2 2.3 Site assessments 2 2.4 GIS assessment and site mapping 4 3. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT - AN OVERVIEW 5 3.1 Overview 5 3.1.1 Land cover 6 3.1.2 Threatened land environments 6 3.1.3 Fauna 7 3.2 Ecological districts of Far North District 7 4. INFORMATION ON EACH ECOLOGICAL DISTRICT 8 4.1 Overview 8 4.2 Ahipara Ecological District 8 4.2.1 Overview 8 4.2.2 Vegetation 9 4.3 Aupouri Ecological District 10 4.3.1 Overview 10 4.3.2 Vegetation 11 4.4 Hokianga Ecological District 13 4.4.1 Overview 13 4.4.2 Vegetation 14 4.5 Kaikohe Ecological District 16 4.5.1 Overview 16 4.5.2 Vegetation 16 4.6 Kerikeri Ecological District 18 4.6.1 Overview 18 4.6.2 Vegetation 19 4.7 Maungataniwha Ecological District 20 4.7.1 Overview 20 4.7.2 Vegetation 22 4.8 Puketi Ecological District 24 4.8.1 Overview 24 4.8.2 Vegetation 25 4.9 Tangihua Ecological District 26 4.9.1 Overview 26 4.9.2 Vegetation 27 4.10 Te Paki Ecological District 29 4.10.1 Overview 29 4.10.2 Vegetation 31 4.11 Tutamoe Ecological District 33 4.11.1 Overview 33 4.11.2 Vegetation 34 © 2019 Contract Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngā Puhi Ki Ngāpuhi a Study of Waiata from the War
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UC Research Repository NGĀ PUHI KI NGĀPUHI A STUDY OF WAIATA FROM THE WAR IN THE NORTH A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Te Reo Māori in the University of Canterbury by J. J. Tana University of Canterbury 2012 Ngā hua o Roto Contents He Kupu Whakamiha – Acknowledgements 2 Ariā – Abstract 5 Chapter 1 Te Whakatakinga – Introduction 6 He Tūtohutanga – Overview 6 Te Whakawhāititanga – Boundaries and limitations 6 Te Tāpua o te mahi – The significance of the work 7 Taku Hononga – Relationship to this study 8 Chapter 2 Te Horopakī – Background 9 Te Tuhinga – The Manuscript 9 Table 1. 10 Table 2. 11 Tā Hori Kerei – Sir George Grey 12 Te Kaitā – The Scribe 14 Chapter 3 Te Huarahi – Method 16 Table 3. 16 Te Whakatāruatanga – Transcription 16 Te Rangahau – The Search 17 Te Whakapākehātanga – Translation 17 Ngā Kōrero Taunaki – Annotations 21 Te Paenga Rangatira – Consultation 22 Chapter 4 Ngā puhi ki Ngāpuhi 24 Map 1. 24 He hari nā Nohotoka 25 He hari 27 He tangi nā Perangi 29 Map 2. 29 He hari nā Te Atua Wera 32 He tau nā Nawemata 35 He tangi nā Te Nehurere 37 He tangi nā Tarehu 39 Chapter 5 He toa nō Ngāti Toa 41 Map 3. 41 He tangi nā Te Rangihaeata 43 He tangi nā Hinewhē 47 Chapter 6 E whangawhanga nei a Whanganui 50 Map 4. 50 He tangi mō Te Uawiri mā 53 He tangi nā Tarawiri 56 Chapter 7 Karakia 58 He karakia 60 He karakia pure 62 He mākutu 65 Chapter 8 He waiata aroha 68 E tō, e te rā, ki tai
    [Show full text]