Venetian Plans Against Mehmed Ii: the Proposals of 'Machomet Bey' and the Case of Yakub Pasha

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Venetian Plans Against Mehmed Ii: the Proposals of 'Machomet Bey' and the Case of Yakub Pasha APPENDIX I VENETIAN PLANS AGAINST MEHMED II: THE PROPOSALS OF 'MACHOMET BEY' AND THE CASE OF YAKUB PASHA Sometime in the summer of 1469, probably in July, the Council of Ten of the Venetian Republic received a letter from Leonardo III Tocco, Despot of Santa Maura and Cephalonia, passing on to Ven­ ice proposals for cooperation from a certain 'Machomet bey' , Sancakbey ('flambolaro') of Angelokastron.! The Council of Ten replied on the 5th ofAugust of the same year. Leonardo Tocco's original letter does not survive, but its contents are reproduced in the registers of the Council ofTen, following the Council's answer. This letter also con­ tained fragments of the original letter, addressed from 'Machomet Bey' to Leonardo Tocco. Leonardo Tocco's communication, as reproduced in the answer ofthe Council ofTen, contains some background information on this 'Machomet bey'. From this letter we learn that he was son of a cer­ tain 'Famiani' or 'Ftamiani' , ex-'dominus' of Thessaloniki.f Leonardo Tocco's letter also informs us that 'Machomet Bey' had served as Sancakbey of Lesbos. He had also served faithfully Sultan Mehmed II in the campaigns ofLesbos and Karaman." However, despite his serv­ ices to the Sultan, 'Machomet Bey' was then dismissed from his of­ fice in an insulting way." For this reason he swore to take revenge on Mehmed II, to do anything in his power to harm him, and to treat him as an enemy.P In order to placate 'Machomet bey', Mehmed II offered him the Sancak of the Morea, but the bey asked for that of 'Argyrokastron' in order to be able to make contacts with Leonardo III Tocco, who also had reasons to wish to harm the Sultan." I ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123r-v. The first entry mentions 'Machomet bey' as 'flambolaro' of cArgirocastron' , something which is corrected by the Venetians in a later entry to that of 'Angelocastron' (ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.124v). 2 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123r-v. Bozic, "Kolebanja", 162-163. 3 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123v. 4 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123v. 5 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123v. 6 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123v. Theoharis Stavrides - 9789004492332 Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 02:41:55AM via free access VENETIAN PLANS AGAINST MEHMED II 403 'Machomet Bey' hoped that Tocco would be able to bring him into contact with Venice, the Pope or any other powerful Italian Signoria, in order to convey the following proposal: The Ottoman official could acquire from the Sultan the Sancak of the Morea any time that he would ask for it. From that position he could hand over to that Christian Signoria the castles of Coranto (Corinth), Mugli and Calaurita, which are 'the keys to the Morea'.7 'Machomet Bey' asked for Tocco's advice as to which Christian power or prince to contact and mentioned the Pope and Venice as possible candidates. It seems, however, that the Christian power aimed at was Venice, which at that time was conducting a war with the Ottomans in the Morea and would have been a prime candidate to accept this proposal. In return for his services, 'Machomet bey' demanded from Ven­ ice one safe-conduct in Latin and one in Greek. In this document it should be promised that he would be allowed to remain in his faith and not be molested or tempted to convert, that his sons and descend­ ants would be servants of the Venetian Signoria, and that after the conquest of the Morea he would receive halfof it, except for the castles and fortresses, all of which would remain in the possession of Ven­ ice. Moreover, he offered that if the Signoria gave him three thou­ sand soldiers, he would attack the Ottoman possessions in the Ro­ mania (ie. the southern Balkans) and would receive one third of all his conquests there, while Venice would get two-thirds." Then 'Machomet Bey' went on to alleviate any possible fears on the part ofVenice that he might hesitate to kill 'Turks', being a 'Turk' himself. For this he gave the examples of Mehmed II, who did not hesitate to fight against Karaman, killing innumerable 'Turks', and ofUzun Hasan, who kills 'Turks' daily. 'Machomet Bey' declared that if he had in his power fifty thousand 'Turks', subjects of Mehmed II, he would kill them all in one day, in order to perform a service to God and satisfy his will." Finally, 'Machomet Bey' asked from the Council of Ten absolute secrecy concerning their dealings, particu­ larly since the Sultan had two spies in Venice, whom he paid four thousand ducats a year, and who conveyed to him all the secrets of the city. Otherwise, the Signoria would miss this opportunity, and 'Machomet Bey' himself would lose his head. to 7 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, [123v. 8 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, [124r. 9 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, [I24r. 10 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, [l24r. Theoharis Stavrides - 9789004492332 Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 02:41:55AM via free access 404 APPENDIX I Together with the affirmative answer of the Council of Ten and the safe-conduct requested by 'Machomet Bey', a formal Patens in the name of the Doge Cristoforo Moro was sent to Leonardo Tocco. In it the Signoria of Venice formally accepted 'Machomet Bey"s pro­ posal and vowed to keep absolute secrecy about the dealings. It is also interesting that the decision to accept the proposals was taken unanimously, sixteen to zero, a fact that points to the enthusiasm with which they were received at this particular time. II The correspondence between the Council of Ten and Leonardo Tocco was continued a few months later. On the 12th of February 1470, the Council ofTen wrote to Tocco expressing their doubts about the truth ofthe proposals, since they had no other proofbut the mere word of 'Machomet Bey'. 12 This was the last mention of 'Machomet Bey' in the Venetian archives. The information in the Venetian document is not enough to help us identify 'Machomet Bey' with any of the known high-ranking of­ ficials of the period of Mehmed II. What we learn about this person from the letter of Leonardo III Tocco to the Council of Ten is the following: First, we may infer that the Bey in question must have been a par­ ticularly powerful and highly-placed one. The Venetians call him 'magnificent and powerful lord' ('magnifico etpotenti domino') and in the letter of Leonardo III Tocco it is mentioned that he had been Sancakbey of the newly-conquered island of Lesbos .l'' Moreover, shortly after his dismissal Mehmed II tried to placate him by offering him the Sancak of the Morea. The mere fact that the Sultan tried to keep the Bey content shows that he must have been a man whom he held in high esteem. Furthermore, the offer of the particular Sancak of the Morea is indicative of the Bey's importance. At that time, the Morea had acquired increased importance since it constituted the main bone of contention between the Ottomans and the Venetians in the Turco­ Venetian war of 1463-1479. Being the main theatre of the war, the Morea could not have been entrusted to a minor bey. The fact that the Sancakbeys of the Morea in the 1460's were major Ottoman com­ manders, who had already distinguished themselves elsewhere, like Turahanoglu Orner Bey, constitutes further proof of the importance of that position. From the above considerations, it follows that this II ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.124v. 12 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.135r. 13 ASV, Consiglio dei Dieci, Misti, 17, f.123v. Theoharis Stavrides - 9789004492332 Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 02:41:55AM via free access VENETIAN PLANS AGAINST MEHMED II 405 'Machomet Bey' must have been a high official possessing great power and influence. In the letter to Leonardo III Tocco, the Bey in question mentions his lineage, saying that he was descended from a certain Famiani or Ftamiani, who was dominus of Thessaloniki.l! Unless this meant that he was the son of an Ottoman governor of the city, this would sug­ gest that the Bey may have been a descendant of a Byzantine aristo­ cratic family and that his ancestors included high Byzantine officials. The last Byzantine governor ofThessaloniki, from 1408 until the sale of the city to the Venetians in 1423, was Andronikos Palaiologos, brother ofJohn VIII and Constantine XL15 'Machomet Bey' says explicitly that he was the son of Famiani ('filio quondam famiani').16 However, we see no one with a name similar to Famiani/Ftamiani being governor in Thessaloniki for more than sixty years before 'Machomet Bey"s letter. The Bey who sent the proposals to Venice through the Despot of Santa Maura is an elusive one to identify. It is possible that he may have been using dissimulation, hiding his true identity, either in or­ der to sound the Venetians and to protect himself against the Sul­ tan's spies in Venice, or in order to deceive, for some reason, the recipients of his proposal. Ifwe take the information that he gives as correct, then the only things we know about him are that he was a high-standing Ottoman official, who held the office of Sancakbey of Lesbos for some time , and that of Sancakbey of Angelokastron, and that he was descended from a lord of Thessaloniki.
Recommended publications
  • Helena Palaiologina (1431-1473) 1
    The last Serbian queen: Helena Palaiologina (1431-1473) 1 The last Serbian queen: Helena Palaiologina (*1431- +1473) Galo Garcés Ávalos / University of Lima “In October of the same year [1446], Lady Helene, Lord Thomas’ daughter, departed from Glarentza to travel to Serbia in order to marry Lazar, the son of despot Lord George. The marriage was celebrated.” George Sphrantzes, Chronicle.1 1 SPHRANTZES, George. The Fall of the Byzantine Empire: A Chronicle by George Sphrantzes, 1401-1477. Translated by Marios Philippides. University of Massachusetts Press (Amherst, 1980), p. 56. Serbian Byzantine Society https://serbianbyzantine.wordpress.com/ The last Serbian queen: Helena Palaiologina (1431-1473) 2 This was not the first time a Byzantine married a Serbian. On February 7, 1392, the young lady Jelena Dragaš arrived in Constantinople, the bride-to-be of Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos (1391-1425). A grand-niece of the great Serbian Emperor Stefan Dušan, and daughter of one of the last great lords of the remnants of the Serbian Empire in Central Greece, she would be the last empress-mother of Byzantium, and the mother of the last Palaeologi.2 Her granddaughter, following her example, would become the last Despoina of Serbia.3 Helena’s father, Thomas, was the youngest son of Manuel II Palaiologos and the last Byzantine Despot to rule over the Morea, as well as a fierce advocate of the Union between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, which he considered was the path for the ultimate salvation of Byzantium. Her mother, Aikaterine Asanina- Zaccaria, was the daughter of the last ruler of Latin Achaea, Centurione Zaccaria, vassal of Ladislas d’Anjou-Durazzo, King of Naples and lord of what remained of Frankish Morea.4 Serbo-Byzantine marriages had occurred many times in the past years, when the Empire was still vast and powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • A12 Nada Zecevic.Vp
    Zbornik radova Vizantolo{kog instituta HßÇÇÇ, 2006 Recueil des travaux de l’Institut d’etudes byzantines XßIIÇ, 2006 UDK 327:94Š(496.5:497.11)“14” Nada Ze~evi} PRVI BRAK DESPOTA LEONARDA III TOKO U radu se razmatraju pitawa direktnih motiva i {ire zainteresovanosti za ugovarawe braka izme|u despota Leonarda III Toko (1449–1479) i Milice, k}erke despota Lazara Brankovi}a i Jelene Paleolog, sklopqenog 1. maja 1463. godine u Dubrovniku. Istorijska analiza, zasnovana uglavnom na dokumentarnim podacima, ali i nekolicini narativnih izve{taja nastalih u vreme blisko skla- pawu braka, navodi na zakqu~ak da je, uprkos evidentnom umawivawu zna~aja te veze, ~emu su neki krugovi izve{ta~a pribegavali, woj u vreme sklapawa ipak bio pridavan {iri politi~ki zna~aj, te da je korist od ovog kratkotrajnog braka Leonardo III Toko imao i posle Mili~ine smrti. Dana 1. maja 1463. godine u velikoj sali Rektorove palate u Dubrovniku sklopqen je brak izme|u Milice Brankovi}, k}erke po~iv{eg srpskog despota Lazara (1456–1458), i Leonarda III Toko (1448–1479), latinskog despota jon- skih ostrva.1 Narativna dela, nastala nekoliko decenija nakon ovoga doga|aja, od stra- ne osoba koje su prostorno i donekle li~no bile bliske supru`nicima,2 opi- 1 Informativno o vladavini Leonarda III Toko (1449–1479), W. Miller, The Latins in the Levant: A History of Frankish Greece (1204–1566) (New York — Cambridge, 1964repr), 483–486; D. M. Nicol, The Despotate of Epiros 1267–1479 (Cambridge, MA 1984), 210–213. Za izvore, literaturu i komentare o Leonardovoj tituli B.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Byzantinischen Kaiser
    Die Byzantinischen Kaiser Genealogie und Herrschaft Byzantinisches Reich: Byzantinischer Kaisertitel „Augustus„ seit 867 „Basileus“ Imperator Kaiserin „Augusta„ Theodosius - Dynastie Kaiser Flavius Arkadius, * 377 in Spanien. Sohn von Kaiser Theodosius I. von Byzanz u. Aelia Arkadius Flaccilla. Bruder des Weströmischen Kaisers Honorius. Spanier 395 - 408 * 377 Imperator Caesar Flavius Arcadius Augustus † 1. 5. 408 Nach dem Tode seines Vaters endgültige Reichsteilung in Ost- u. Westreich. Mitkaiser im Osten Roms seit 19. Januar 383. Kaiser von Byzanz seit 17. Januar 395 - 1. Oströmischer Kaiser - Geistig zurückgeblieben u. abhängig von seinen Ratgebern. Er war der hilfloseste Kaiser auf dem byzantinischen Thron. Erließ mehrere Gesetze gegen Häresien. Kaiser Arkadius Seine Ratgeber: Rufinus, Prätorianerpräfekt, vermutlich der Initiator des Massakers in Thessalonike von 390, der selbst den Kaiserthron erstrebte und versuchte seine Tochter mit Arkadius zu vermählen. Unbeliebt bei der Armee, † am 27. November 396, während einer Parade ermordet. Eutropius, ehemaliger Sklave, entmannter Prostituierter, Haushofmeister, hintertrieb das Vorhaben des Rufinus (den Kaiser mit dessen Tochter zu vermählen) und konnte während dessen Abwesenheit die Verlobung mit Eudoxia herbeiführen. 399 zum Konsul erhoben, † 400 wegen Fehlentscheidungen hingerichtet. Anthemius, Prätorianerpräfekt. Gute Beziehungen zum Sassanidenreich. Usurpator: Gainas (383-388). Feldherr, ließ vermutlich Rufinus ermorden und verlangte vom Kaiser die Überlieferung des Eutropius. Er unternahm eine Palastrevolte und wurde schließlich vom kaisertreuen Heer geschlagen, fiel dem Hunnenkönig Uldin in die Hände und wurde im Jahr 400 enthauptet. Ehe am 27. April 395 mit der Gotin Aelia Eudoxia I., * um 375, † am 6. Oktober 404 nach einer Fehlgeburt, Tochter des heidnischen Rhetors Leontios Bautogast von Athen, als welche sie Athenais hieß. Seit 400 Augusta.
    [Show full text]
  • Enea Ritrova Eleno E Andromaca Enea Gjen Përsëri Eleno Dhe Andromakën
    pagina 1 Anno 17 n.1 Febbraio 2019 Anno 17 Distribuzione gratuita in: Mensile di attualità e cultura italo-albanese Albania, Australia, Numero 1 Belgio, Canada, Germania, Direttore editoriale: Hasan Aliaj Grecia, Francia, Italia, Febbraio 2019 Stati Uniti e Svizera Enea ritrova Eleno e Andromaca Enea gjen përsëri Eleno dhe Andromakën Matrimonio di Preparato da HASAN ALIAJ dal nemico nel sacrificio, e non preda, Përgatitur nga HASAN ALIAJ e Simoenta të re (lumi afër Trojës) për të né del suo vincitore serva, né moglie! Io bërë një sakrificë solemne të varreve dhe, Giovanni Castriota, “Appena mi vide venire e dopo l’incendio di Troja, e dopo aver va- “Sapo më pa duke ardhur dhe si zakonisht, kishte ndërtuar një grumbull riconobbe me, parve che vedesse gato per tanti mari destinata ormai a ser- më njohu, dukej se shihte diçka të madh midis dy areve të mëdha të tufës cosa prodigiosa, perché stupita vire, fui costretta a subire il giogo ed il të mrekullueshme, duke qënë se së gjelbër, monument loti dhe dhimbje; në figlio di Scanderbeg e forsennata rimase prima lusso della stirpe di Achille ed a sopport- ishte e habitur dhe e frikësuar të cilin, me dhuntitë e trishtuara dhe me immobile; quindi smorta e gelata are come sposo il suo superbo figlio Pirro. mbeti fillimisht pa lëvizur; pastaj, zëra të zymta që thërrasin shpirtin e madh Di ALESSANDRO CASTRIOTA SCANDERBEG cadde svenuta. Poi quando noi, Questi poi si invaghì di Ermione (figlia di e shurdhër dhe e akullt, ra pa të Hekorit, nderonte kujtimin e tij. Menelao e di Elena, la triste eroina) e lei dopo lungo tentativo, riuscimmo ndjenja.
    [Show full text]
  • Regesto Maior
    Silvia Ronchey Silvia Ronchey L’enigma di Piero L’enigma di Piero Regesto Maior Regesto Maior Qui chi lo desidera troverà allineate tutte le fonti, primarie e secondarie; esaminate e discusse in dettaglio tutte le prove; squadernato l'intero dossier indiziario di quest'indagine; messo a nudo l'ordito di testimonianze, di ipotesi di congetture che sono il rovescio e il sostegno della trama del libro. Perché il lettore possa sciogliere agevolmente le sigle e le abbreviazioni usate nei rimandi bibliograÞci interni al Regesto, viene fornita anche la Lista delle abbreviazioni già stampata nel libro Regesto Maior Indice Dal cuore delle tenebre ........................................................................................................8 Barrès ....................................................................................................................................9 Un signore addolorato, di grande aspetto ............................................................................11 Un intellettuale sulla cattedra di Pietro................................................................................16 Volti di Enea Silvio ..............................................................................................................19 Le spose occidentali ............................................................................................................22 L’allievo ..............................................................................................................................28 Johann David Passavant
    [Show full text]
  • Bbbs 33 (2007)
    33 2007 BULLETIN OF BRITISH BYZANTINE STUDIES BULLETIN OF BRITISH BYZANTINE STUDIES 33 ISSN 0265-162 2007 being the Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies Chairmen, Secretaries and Addresses of National Committees of the International Association of Byzantine Studies Albania: Dhorka Dhamo, Pellumb Xhufi, Rr Sulejman Pasha Pall 124, Shk. 3, Apart 37 Tirana-Albanie Australia: John Melville-Jones (President), Classics and Ancient History (M205) University of Western Australia, Crawley W.A. 6009, Australia; Kathleen Hay (Secretary) 104, Abbott Street, Sandringham, Victoria 3191, Australia; Lynda Garland (Treasurer) Austria: W. Hörander, Institut für Byzantinistik und Neograzistik der Universität Wien, Postgrasse 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria Belgium: Anne Tihon (President); Jacques Noret (Vice-President and Treasurer); Caroline Mace (Secretary). Address of the Society for Byzantine Studies: Rue Ducale 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; address of the secretariat: Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, B3000 Leuven, Belgium Brazil: Angela Comnene, G. Kambani, 505 St Laurent Blvd, suite 106, Ottowa K1K4-4, Canada Bulgaria: Prof. Vassil Ghiuselev (President), University of Sofia "St Kliment Ohridski", Faculty of History, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Bd., Room 40A, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria. Canada: Antony Littlewood, Dept. of Classical Studies, The University of Western Ontario, Talbot College, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7 Chile: Alejandro Zorbas, Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Filosofia, Centro de Estudios Bizaninos y Neohelenicos, Casilla 10136, Santiago, Chile China: Zhu Huan, Xu Jia-Lin, Wang Yue, History Dept., Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu Province, P. R. China Cyprus: Th. Papadopoullos, K. Kyrris, P.O. Box 22031, 1516 Nicosia, Cyprus Czech Republic: R. Dostalova, V. Vavrinek, Institut des Études Grecques, Romaines et Latines pres l’Academie Tchecoslovaque des Sciences et Lettres, Lazarska 8, 120 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic Denmark: K.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Ties and Written Multilingual Heritage of the Frankapani at the Dawn of the Early Modern Period
    Ivan Jurković Ivan Jurković Family Ties and Written Multilingual Heritage of the Frankapani at the Dawn of the Early Modern Period Pregledni rad Review article UDK 81’246.3:929.737Frankopan>”14/15” 929.737Frankopan:930.85>(4)”14/15” https://doi.org/10.32728/tab.17.2020.7 In the second half of the fifteenth and the first half of the sixteenth century the Frankapani of Krk, Senj, and Modruš were at the peak of their power. This family of Croatian counts was networked through marriage from the Adriatic to the Baltic Sea with Italian, Hungarian, Austrian, and German royal and aristocratic families. Their presence at the courts of their next of kin, as well as their in-laws, is therefore not surprising, whether it be the Roman Curia or the Hohenzollern Branderburger Palace in Berlin. In such a wide system of commu- nications, the Frankapani presented themselves to the European public as a multilingual family ready to promulgate not only the written heritage honoured during the Middle Ages in Croatia (Latin and Glagolitic), but also ready to adopt, promote, and disseminate the written heritage of their spouses (Italian, German, Hungarian).* Key words: the Frankapani of Krk, Senj, and Modruš, the German-Roman Breviary, the anti-Turkish speech Oratio pro Croatia, the translated epistles of Saint Paul Epistolae Pavli lingva Hvngarica donatae, prayer book Hortu- lus Animae, symbolic communication, (self)promotion, sixteenth century In late mediaeval and early modern times, not a soul in Western Christendom questioned the legend that Pope Gregory the Great (590–604) was descended from the Frankapani (It.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary, Venice and the Ottoman Empire After the Fall of Negroponte
    SREDNJI VIJEK Alexandru Simon ISSN 0353-295X UDK 94(450 Venezia)“14“ RADOVI – Zavod za hrvatsku povijest 94(439)“14“ Vol. 42, Zagreb 2010. 94(497)“14“ Original scientific paper Crusading between the Adriatic and the Black Sea: Hungary, Venice and the Ottoman Empire after the Fall of Negroponte In early 1474, almost ten years had elapsed since Matthias Corvinus’ last and failed major anti-Ottoman attempt. The rather peculiar, given previous and later events and developments, Habsburg-Hunyadi ‘crusader’ plan of 1466-1467 had ended in the Transylvanian rebellion and the ensuing Moldavian campaign of king Matthias. Over the next years, the king focused on his Bohemian and Habsburg problems and claims, while the crusader plans drafted in 1471 were once again basically brought to a halt by another conspiracy against John Hunyadi’s son. Less than three years later, the Ottoman raid on Oradea (Nagyvarad, Grosswardein), as well as Venetian financial offers, compelled the king to re-take anti-Ottoman action. His unsuccessful negotiations with sultan Mehmed II (1472-1473), alongside the aid rendered during the Walachian- Moldavian conflict to Stephen III of Moldavia (1470/1471-1473), also brought back the king to the crusader frontline. While having to restore good connections to pope Sixtus IV, eager, in return to strengthen his Western credit by crusader actions and plans, Matthias Corvinus had also to deal with the Habsburg and Jagellonian attempts to weaken his position and diminish his influence in crusader matters too, in Hungary as well as in the neighboring areas. Newfound sources, namely Italian, Milanese in particular, archival data, provided the grounds for new perspectives on Matthias Corvinus’ Ottoman and anti-Ottoman actions in the mid 1470’.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Tocco: Seigneurs, Vassaux, Otages, Renegats
    GAMER, I, 1 (2012) s. 11-22 LES TOCCO: SEIGNEURS, VASSAUX, OTAGES, RENEGATS Elizabeth A. Zachariadou* Özet Toccolar: Derebeyler, Vasallar, Rehineler, Muhtediler Tocco Latin Hanedanının Batı Yunanistan’ın eski Bizans bölgelerine doğru yayılması Osmanlı’nın Trakya’ya genişlemesiyle aynı döneme rastlamaktadır. Çok geçmeden I. Carlo Tocco (ölümü 1429) ancak Sultan Bayezid döneminde Osmanlı’nın vasalı olması durumunda ayakta kalabileceklerinin farkına varmıştır. Carlo’nun torunları, önce Sultan I. Mehmed daha sonra Sultan II. Murad’ın sarayında rehine olarak hizmet etmişlerdir. Tocco Hanedanı Venedikliler ile Osmanlılar arasındaki savaşı sonlandıran 1479 antlaşmasıyla birlikte son bulmuştur. Ancak 1539’da Aya Mavra’nın Sancakbeyi Karluzade Hüseyinşah Bey idi. Tocco’lara ait bölgelerin adı vasal Carlo’ya atfen Osmanlılar tarafından Karluili ya da Karleli olarak adlandırılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Tocco, Osmanlı, Yunanistan, Venedik Abstract The expansion of the Latin dynasty of the Tocco in the old Byzantine territories of western Greece coincided with the expansion of the Ottomans in Thrace. Soon Carlo I Tocco (died in 1429) realized that he could survive only if he accepted to become a vassal of the Ottomans, probably in the time of Sultan Bayezid I. The descendants of Carlo served as hostages in the court of the Sultans Mehemmed I and later Murad II. The dynasty of the Toccos disappeared with the end of the war between the Venetians and the Ottomans which finished with the treaty of 1479. However, a Karluzade Huseynşahbeğ was sancakbeği of Aya Mavra in 1539. The territories of the Toccos * Prof. Dr., University of Crete. Elizabeth A. Zachariadou were named by the Ottomans Karluili or Karleli after their vassal Carlo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Orient
    y^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/latinorienOOmill THE LATIN ORIENT HELPS FOR STUDENTS OF HISTORY, No. 37 Edited by C.Johnson, M.A., H. W. V. Temperley, M.A. and J. P. Whitney, D.D., D.C.L. THE LATIN ORIENT BY WILLIAM MILLER, M.A. HON. LL.D. IN THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF GREECE ; CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE HISTORICAL AND ETHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREECE AUTHOR OF "the LATINS IN THE LEVANT* ST. MICHAEL'S \ 0. \ COLLEGE / i:^ > LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN CO. 1920 m ^o lo CONTENTS PAGE 1. The Crusading States in Palestine - - - 11 2. The Kingdom of Cyprus - - - - 17 3. The Prankish States in Greece - - - 23 4. The Venetian Colonies in Greece and Albania - 41 5. The Genoese Colonies - - - - - 61 6. The Knights of Rhodes - - - - 56 Bibliography - . - - - - 68 .rA5 THE LATIN ORIENT The Latin States, which arose in the Middle Ages in the Near East, may be divided into six groups: 1. The Crusading States in Palestine, which were the offspring of the First Crusade, and comprised: (a) The Kingdom of Jerusalem (1099-1291). lb) The Principality of Antioch (1098-1188; the city till 1268). (c) The County of Edessa (1098-1144). (d) The County of Tripohs (1102-88; the city till 1289). 2. The Kingdom of Cyprus, which, founded by an accident, nominally continued the Kingdom of Jerusalem till it ended as a Venetian colony (1191- 1571). 3. The Frankish States, which sprang from the ruins of the Greek Empire as the result of the Fourth Crusade.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stroll Down the Historic Eras of Kefalonia
    A stroll down the historic eras of Kefalonia Αrchaeology An aition explaining the name of Cephallenia and reinforcing its cultural connections with Athens associates the island with the mythological figure of Cephalus, who helped Amphitryon of Mycenae in a war against the Taphians and Teleboans. He was rewarded with the island of Same, which thereafter came to be known as Cephallenia. Cephalonia has also been suggested as the Homeric Ithaca, the home of Odysseus, rather than the smaller island bearing this name today. Robert Bittlestone, in his book Odysseus Unbound, has suggested that Paliki, now a peninsula of Cephalonia, was a separate island during the late Bronze Age, and it may be this which Homer was referring to when he described Ithaca. A project which started in the Summer of 2007 and lasted three years has examined this possibility. Cephalonia is also referenced in relation to the goddess Britomartis, as the location where she is said to have ‘received divine honours from the inhabitants under the name of Laphria’. Αrchaeology In the Southwest of the island, in the area of Leivathos, an ongoing archaeological field survey by the Irish Institute at Athens has discovered dozens of sites, with dates ranging from the Palaeolithic to the Venetian period. From an archaeological point of view, Cephalonia is an extremely interesting island. Archaeological finds go back to 40,000 BP. Without doubt, the most important era for the island is the Mycenaean era, from approximately 1500-1100 B.C. The archaeological museum in Cephalonia’s capital Argostoli – although small – is regarded as the most important museum in Greece for its exhibits from this era.
    [Show full text]
  • Despre O Carte
    Alexandru Simon Matthias Corvinus’ Anti-Ottoman Policies in the Early 1470’: Political Patterns, Military Actions and Late Medieval Propaganda The ‘low-born’ contested king Matthias Corvinus was enthroned a crusader without having proven to be one. His was a crusader by blood, as the son of athlete John (Ioan/ Iancu, János) Hunyadi. It played a great role, especially on the continental level, ensuring Matthias the im-mediate support of Calixt III and the eventual aid of Pius II. It was both his lasting political safe-conduct (for he was expected to do great things) and political handicap (for his actions turned out to be no match for these expectations). From his failed anti-Ottoman plan of 1467, which helped sparkle the Transylvanian rebellion, a plan drafted together with his previous and future arch-enemy, then his adoptive father, Frederic(k) (Friedrich) III of Habsburg, to the Djem crisis, when he appeared both as the Christian Mars and the blood-relative of the sultans, his ‘crusa-der career’ was a constant and aware mixture of high-profile politically correct speech and equally useful compromise, grounded on the every-day frontier life with the Ottomans and on the limits and resources of the much challenged bulwark of Christendom, the Hungarian realm1. Matthias seemingly never forgot an aspect, which he, like many contemporary “analysts’ and politicians, overlooked in their discourses. Had it not been for the ‘miracle of Belgrade’, Hunyadi’s anti-Ottoman, in particular, career would have ended as a failure, after the defeats of Varna (1444) and Kossovopolje (1448), regardless of who was actually to blame for them.
    [Show full text]