DOCSLIB.ORG

Automatic Detection of Contradictions in Texts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Automatic Detection of Contradictions in Texts Automatic Detection of Contradictions in Texts Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie des Fachbereiches 05 – Sprache, Literatur, Kultur der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen vorgelegt von Natali Karlova-Bourbonus, M.A. Aus Frankfurt am Main 2018 Vorsitzender: Herr Prof. Dr. Thomas Möbius Erstgutachter: Herr Prof. Dr. Henning Lobin Zweitgutachter: Herr Prof. Dr. Helmut Feilke For my little prince Philipp Acknowledgments Five years are now passed since I began my doctoral thesis on contradictions in news texts and at this point, I would like to thank everybody who helped me in finalizing it. First of all, I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my Doktorvater, Prof. Dr. Henning Lobin, who gave me a priceless opportunity to collect new experience in teach- ing and researching and to learn how exciting natural language processing can be. Dear Henning, thank you for supporting me the whole, often thorny, way to the completed mon- ograph from the first half-baked ideas till the last dot on the paper. I would also like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my second supervisor, Prof. Dr. Helmut Feilke. Participation in his GCSC-Kolloquium in the year 2014 led to a long- desired breakthrough in my research. I am grateful for his sharing of precious ideas with me, which laid the groundwork for my research. While reading the present monograph you will come across the statement several times that finding contradictions is a challenging task for a human. I would like to thank all the students at the University of Giessen who did not let this challenge discourage them and who, in the years 2015 and 2016, took part on my surveys conducted within the framework of the present study. Their patience, curiosity, and ability to explore latent things in the texts are admirable. Last but not least, I would like to thank the most important people in my life – my family. My parents, who always let me go my way, who never judged me for my decisions, and patiently and gratuitous supported me in seemingly inextricable moments. My husband Nico, who inspired and motivated me to make possible what, in the beginning, seemed to be impossi- ble. And my brother Denis for the exciting conversations on the processing of natural lan- guages. Table of Contents I Table of Contents Page List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... V List of Figures .............................................................................................................. VIII List of Tables.................................................................................................................. IX 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Statement of Problem and Motivation .............................................................. 11 1.2 Subject of the Study ......................................................................................... 16 1.3 Research Questions and Objectives ................................................................ 17 1.4 Structure of the Thesis ..................................................................................... 18 1.5 How to Read This Thesis ................................................................................. 20 2 State of the Art ........................................................................................................ 21 2.1 Methods and Systems ..................................................................................... 21 2.2 Corpora of Contradictions ................................................................................ 32 2.2.1 FraCas Inference Data Suite ................................................................ 32 2.2.2 RTE Datasets and Their Modifications .................................................. 34 2.2.3 Stanford Corpus of Real-Life Contradictions ......................................... 37 2.2.4 SNLI Corpus ......................................................................................... 38 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................ 39 3 Contradiction in Logic and Language ................................................................... 41 3.1 Contradiction as Concept of Logic ................................................................... 41 3.1.1 Contradiction in Traditional (Aristotelian) Logic ..................................... 41 3.1.2 Contradiction and Contrariety ............................................................... 43 3.1.3 Contradiction and Quantification ........................................................... 43 3.1.4 Related Terms ...................................................................................... 45 3.2 Negation in Natural Languages ........................................................................ 46 3.2.1 Typology of Negation ............................................................................ 46 3.2.2 Negation and Word Order ..................................................................... 52 3.2.3 Scope of Negation ................................................................................ 52 3.2.4 Double and Multiple Negation ............................................................... 55 3.3 Problematic Issues about Contradiction ........................................................... 59 3.3.1 Contradiction and Presupposition ......................................................... 59 3.3.2 Contradiction and Modality ................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Contradiction and Vagueness ............................................................... 64 3.3.4 The Concept of Fake Contradiction ...................................................... 66 Table of Contents II 3.4 Classification of Contradictions ........................................................................ 67 3.4.1 Classification of Svintsov ...................................................................... 67 3.4.2 Classification of Mučnik ........................................................................ 69 3.4.3 Typology according to Contradictory Element ....................................... 71 3.4.3.1 In Educational Psychology ...................................................... 71 3.4.3.2 In Computational Linguistics ................................................... 73 3.5 Causes and Functions of Contradictions .......................................................... 76 3.5.1 Causes ................................................................................................. 76 3.5.2 Functions .............................................................................................. 79 3.6 Summary ........................................................................................................ 81 4 The Characteristics of News Texts ........................................................................ 83 4.1 Introductory Notions ......................................................................................... 83 4.1.1 News as Text Genre ............................................................................. 83 4.1.2 Online Newspaper vs. Printed Newspaper............................................ 86 4.1.3 Values of Selection and Production of News Articles ............................ 88 4.2 Structure and Elements of News Articles ......................................................... 91 4.3 Language of News Article ................................................................................ 95 4.3.1 Reported Speech.................................................................................. 95 4.3.1.1 News as an “embedded talk” .................................................. 95 4.3.1.2 Types of Reported Speech ..................................................... 96 4.3.1.3 Reporting Expressions ............................................................ 98 4.3.2 News Actors Labeling ........................................................................... 99 4.3.3 Event Categories .................................................................................. 99 4.3.4 Time and Place Mentions ................................................................... 100 4.3.5 The Use of Numbers and Figures ....................................................... 101 4.3.6 Other Characteristics .......................................................................... 102 4.4 Summary ...................................................................................................... 102 5 Typology Construction: Types of Contradictions in News Texts ...................... 104 5.1 Compilation of News Text Contradiction Corpus ............................................ 104 5.1.1 Data Collection ................................................................................... 104 5.1.1.1 Collection of News Texts ....................................................... 104 5.1.1.2 Survey 1: Finding the Contradictions..................................... 106 5.1.1.3 Results and Evaluation ......................................................... 107 5.1.2 Data Validation and Filtering ............................................................... 108 5.1.2.1 Survey 2: Contradiction or Not .............................................. 108 5.1.2.2 Results and Evaluation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi OXFORD SURVEYS IN SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS general editors: Chris Barker, NewYorkUniversity, and Christopher Kennedy, University of Chicago advisory editors: Kent Bach, San Francisco State University; Jack Hoeksema, University of Groningen;LaurenceR.Horn,Yale University; William Ladusaw, University of California Santa Cruz; Richard Larson, Stony Brook University; Beth Levin, Stanford University;MarkSteedman,University of Edinburgh; Anna Szabolcsi, New York University; Gregory Ward, Northwestern University published Modality Paul Portner Reference Barbara Abbott Intonation and Meaning Daniel Büring Questions Veneeta Dayal Mood Paul Portner Inquisitive Semantics Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen in preparation Aspect Hana Filip Lexical Pragmatics Laurence R. Horn Conversational Implicature Yan Huang OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics IVANO CIARDELLI, JEROEN GROENENDIJK, AND FLORIS ROELOFSEN 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in Impression: Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms ofa Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives .
    [Show full text]
  • Our Changing World: a Global Assessment
    OUR CHANGING WORLD A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT 1991 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................... ASIA AND THE PACIFIC . ... .. ......... ... ... 35 Japan ........ .......... .... ..... ............ 35 CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . .. .. 2 Republic of Korea ....... .... ............. .... ...... 37 North Korea .... ... ..... .... ..... ............... 38 NATO .................................................. 3 China ... ............... ........ ... .... .... .... 39 Canada . ...... .. ....... ... .... ......... ... 5 Taiwan ... ...... ... ...... ... ................... 39 Great Britain . 5 Philippines ... ....................... .... .... ... 40 France . .. .. 6 Vietnam .......... ....... ....... .... ....... ... 41 Germany .. .. .... ..... ............ ..... .. .. 7 Cambodia . ......... .... .......................... 41 Spain . .................................... ....... 8 Thailand ............ ........ .......... ....... ... 42 Italy . .. .. 8 India ...... ........... .... ..................... 43 Greece . ... ... ... ............ .... ... .... ..... .. 9 Pakistan ..... ....... .. ................. ... ...... 44 Afghanistan ....................................... 44 EASTERN EUROPE . ........ ... ..... ...... .... ... 10 Australia . .......... ....... ............... ...... 45 Poland . ..... ....................... ........... ... 10 Czechoslovakia . .. 12 MEXICO, CENTRAL AMERICA Hungary ...... .............. ....... ....... ... ... 13 AND THE CARIBBEAN . ........................ 46 Romania . ..... ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Snippetssnippets
    snippetssnippets Issue 37 - December 2019 Special issue in honor of Uli Sauerland Contents 1. Andreea C. Nicolae, Patrick D. Elliott, and Yasutada Sudo Introduction ................................................... ..................1 2. DorothyAhn ASL IX to locus as a modifier ................................................... ..2 3. Artemis Alexiadou Decomposing scalar approximatives in Greek ......................................4 4. Anna Alsop, Lucas Champollion, and Ioana Grosu A problem for Fox’s (2007) account of free choice disjunction ........................7 5. Anton Benz and Nicole Gotzner Quantifier irgendein and local implicature ........................................10 6. Jonathan David Bobaljik and Susi Wurmbrand Fake indexicals, binding, and the PCC ............................................13 7. Brian Buccola and Emmanuel Chemla Alternatives of disjunctions: when a disjunct contains the antecedent of a pronoun ....16 8. LukaCrnicˇ and Brian Buccola Scoping NPIs out of DPs ................................................... .....19 9. Chris Cummins Some contexts requiring precise number meanings .................................22 10. Patrick D. Elliott and Paul Marty Exactly one theory of multiplicity inferences .......................................24 11. Anamaria Fal˘ au¸sand˘ Andreea C. Nicolae Two coordinating particles are better than one: free choice items in Romanian ........27 12. DannyFox Individual concepts and narrow scope illusions ....................................30 13. DannyFox Degree concepts
    [Show full text]
  • Typhoon Haiyan 2013 Evacuation Preparations and Awareness
    International Journal of Sustainable Future for Human Security DISASTER MITIGATION J-SustaiN Vol. 3, No. 1 (2015) 37-45 http://www.j-sustain.com MITIGATIONMITIGATION Generally speaking, tropical cyclones can bring about storm Typhoon Haiyan 2013 surges that can cause great damage to unprepared developing countries, though even developed countries like the United States Evacuation Preparations and and Japan can also be greatly affected by these events [2] [3]. Awareness Typhoon Haiyan, in 2013, could be considered another defining event in raising awareness about storm surges, not only in the a* b Philippines but within the entire world. Miguel Esteban , Ven Paolo Valenzuela , Nam Category 5 Typhoon Haiyan (known as Yolanda in the Yi Yunc, Takahito Mikamic, Tomoya Philippines) made landfall in the Philippines on the 8th November Shibayamac, Ryo Matsumarud, Hiroshi Takagie, 2013 at almost the peak of its power, devastating the islands of Leyte f g and Samar and causing large damage to other areas in the Visayas[4, Nguyen Danh Thao , Mario De Leon , 5]. The maximum sustained wind speeds were around 160 knots, Takahiro Oyamac, Ryota Nakamurac. the largest in the recorded history of the Western North Pacific. The strong winds, together with the typhoon’s extremely low aGraduation Program in Sustainability Science, Global Leadership central pressure (895hPa), generated a huge storm surge which Initiative (GPSS-GLI), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan engulfed several coastal towns and caused particularly large b Centre for disaster preparedness, Manila, Philippines damage to Tacloban city. The typhoon’s strong winds caused c Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Waseda devastating damage to the vegetation, leaving behind bare University, Tokyo, Japan mountains and flattened fields only dotted with the rare dead tree d Department of Regional Development Studies, Toyo University eTokyo Institute of Technolgy, Tokyo, Japan trunks that were left standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaina Studies
    JAINA STUDIES Edited by Peter Flügel Volume 1 2016 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden Johannes Klatt Jaina-Onomasticon Edited by Peter Flügel and Kornelius Krümpelmann 2016 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. For further information about our publishing program consult our website http://www.harrassowitz-verlag.de © Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden 2016 This work, including all of its parts, is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the limits of copyright law without the permission of the publisher is forbidden and subject to penalty. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. Printed on permanent/durable paper. Printing and binding: Hubert & Co., Göttingen Printed in Germany ISSN 2511-0950 ISBN 978-3-447-10584-2 Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 7 Life and Work of Johannes Klatt ........................................................................................ 9 (by Peter
    [Show full text]
  • Scalar Implicatures Under Uncertainty
    Scalar implicatures under uncertainty by Cathy Agyemang A thesis submitted to the Institute of Cognitive Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Cognitive Science in Cognitive Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2020 Cathy Agyemang ii Abstract Studies on judgments under uncertainty argue that individuals reason about the likelihoods of events in ways that are inconsistent with the basic axioms of probability. However, such studies fail to consider that the information expressed can be ambiguous between literal and strengthened meanings, through scalar impli- catures. Under a literal interpretation, intuitive judgments may appear to violate the rules of probability. However, scalar implicatures change meanings, such that, probability theory alone does not determine how people make judgments. Instead, individuals rely on experience, prior knowledge and other cognitive fac- tors. I examine the availability of scalar implicatures under uncertainty and its influence on perceived event likelihood. Comparing contexts where an implicature is available to where it is not, I present evidence that violations of probability theory occur only in conditions where scalar implicatures are available. Thus, prob- abilistic judgments must also consider how individuals apply conversational reasoning in order to resolve uncertainty. iii Acknowledgments Completing my Master’s was an incredibly humbling experience. This work would not have been at all pos- sible without the efforts of many people. To avoid waxing poetic, I will briefly acknowledge the contributions of some of these individuals here. First, I would like to thank my thesis committee, Deepthi Kamawar, Ida Toivonen and Ai Taniguchi for their careful consideration of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Logics of Synonymy
    Journal of Philosophical Logic (2020) 49:767–805 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09537-5 Logics of Synonymy Levin Hornischer1 Received: 30 October 2018 / Accepted: 14 November 2019 /Published online: 9 January 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract We investigate synonymy in the strong sense of content identity (and not just meaning similarity). This notion is central in the philosophy of language and in applications of logic. We motivate, uniformly axiomatize, and characterize several “benchmark” notions of synonymy in the messy class of all possible notions of synonymy. This class is divided by two intuitive principles that are governed by a no-go result. We use the notion of a scenario to get a logic of synonymy (SF) which is the canonical rep- resentative of one division. In the other division, the so-called conceptivist logics, we find, e.g., the well-known system of analytic containment (AC). We axiomatize four logics of synonymy extending AC, relate them semantically and proof-theoretically to SF, and characterize them in terms of weak/strong subject matter preservation and weak/strong logical equivalence. This yields ways out of the no-go result and novel arguments—independent of a particular semantic framework—for each notion of synonymy discussed (using, e.g., Hurford disjunctions or homotopy theory). This points to pluralism about meaning and a certain non-compositionality of truth in logic programs and neural networks. And it unveils an impossibility for synonymy: if it is to preserve subject matter, then either conjunction and disjunction lose an essential property or a very weak absorption law is violated.
    [Show full text]
  • Boban Arsijenevic
    Syntactic, semantic and methodological aspects of an expanded ontology in the modal and attitudinal domain1 1. Introduction In the target paper, Moltmann has a twofold goal. She argues for the replacement of possible world semantics by object-based truthmaker semantics in the modelling of attitudinal and modal natural language expressions, and for the introduction of two novel ontological classes for this purpose: modal and attitudinal objects. After outlining the standard view and the main components of the proposed alternative, the paper examines different concrete types of attitudinal and modal expressions which have presented problems for the standard theory, presenting their analysis in the proposed approach, and pointing out the advantages of the latter. Overall, Moltmann’s approach gives a much tighter semantics of modal and attitudinal meanings. Her general preference is for simplex items over complex representations: truthmakers over clauses specifying truth conditions, attitudinal and modal objects over possible-world predicates, attitudinal-and-modal-object predicates over orderings and divisions among possible worlds as attitudinal and modal bases. In all these cases, it is the expansion of ontology that is chosen over deriving the observed phenomena from a minimal ontology. Most prominently, she adds the ontological classes of attitudinal and modal objects, which get further divided into subclasses too, when it turns out that different attitudes or modalities trigger different linguistic effects. This enables her to model attitudinal and modal nuances (beliefs, doubts, claims, suggestions, i.e. permissions, obligations, possibilities, necessities) by assigning each of them a corresponding predicate. Instead of e.g. an existential quantification over Mary-leaving situations within the domain of situations that comply with deontic requirements – in order to capture the semantic nuance of permission, she directly predicates of a modal object that it is a weak or strong permission, and that its truthmaking is determined by the clause Mary is leaving.
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Tropical Cyclones and Unusual Areas of Tropical Cyclone Formation
    A flood is an overflow of an expanse of water that submerges land.[1] The EU Floods directive defines a flood as a temporary covering by water of land not normally covered by water.[2] In the sense of "flowing water", the word may also be applied to the inflow of the tide. Flooding may result from the volume of water within a body of water, such as a river or lake, which overflows or breaks levees, with the result that some of the water escapes its usual boundaries.[3] While the size of a lake or other body of water will vary with seasonal changes in precipitation and snow melt, it is not a significant flood unless such escapes of water endanger land areas used by man like a village, city or other inhabited area. Floods can also occur in rivers, when flow exceeds the capacity of the river channel, particularly at bends or meanders. Floods often cause damage to homes and businesses if they are placed in natural flood plains of rivers. While flood damage can be virtually eliminated by moving away from rivers and other bodies of water, since time out of mind, people have lived and worked by the water to seek sustenance and capitalize on the gains of cheap and easy travel and commerce by being near water. That humans continue to inhabit areas threatened by flood damage is evidence that the perceived value of living near the water exceeds the cost of repeated periodic flooding. The word "flood" comes from the Old English flod, a word common to Germanic languages (compare German Flut, Dutch vloed from the same root as is seen in flow, float; also compare with Latin fluctus, flumen).
    [Show full text]
  • Numerals and Their Modifiers: How Morphology Constrains Alternatives
    Numerals and their modifiers: How morphology constrains alternatives Teodora Mihoc Draft of May 16, 2018 Abstract Bare numerals (three), comparative-modified numerals (more/less than three), and superlative- modified numerals (at most/least three) differ in crucial ways with respect to bounding entailments, scalar implicatures, ignorance implicatures, and acceptability in downward-entailing environments. Many important strides have been made in deriving various subsets of their patterns, yet we still lack a unified account. In this paper I show that the key to such an account lies with the proper understand- ing of the contribution of the morphological pieces of these items – the numeral, much/little, and the comparative/superlative morpheme. From this we can not only obtain truth conditions that straight- forwardly capture just the right bounding entailments for each item, but we can also naturally derive scalar and domain alternatives that yield just the desired scalar implicature, ignorance implicature, and acceptability in downward-entailing environments patterns. The account naturally shares features with existing alternative-based accounts of numerals, especially that of Spector(2015), but improves both empirically and conceptually on them all. Keywords numerals, comparative, superlative, extents, scalar alternatives, domain alternatives, ex- haustification, polarity 1 Introduction Bare numerals (three; henceforth, BNs), comparative-modified numerals (more/less than three; hence- forth, CMs), and superlative-modified numerals (at most/least three; henceforth SMs) are similar and different in interesting ways. There have been many theories trying to capture their behavior. At the same time I believe that none of the existing theories gets right all of the basic features of these items that we may like to understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclones in 1991
    ROYAL OBSERVATORY HONG KONG TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 1991 CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Published March 1993 Prepared by Royal Observatory 134A Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong Permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be obtained through the Royal Observatory This publication is prepared and disseminated in the interest of promoting the exchange of information. The Government of Hong Kong (including its servants and agents) makes no warranty, statement or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, and in so far as permitted by law, shall not have any legal liability or responsibility (including liability for negligence) for any loss, damage or injury (including death) which may result whether directly or indirectly, from the supply or use of such information. This publication is available from: Government Publications Centre General Post Office Building Ground Floor Connaught Place Hong Kong 551.515.2:551.506.1 (512.317) 3 CONTENTS Page FRONTISPIECE: Tracks of tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific and the South China Sea in 1991 FIGURES 4 TABLES 5 HONG KONG'S TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNING SIGNALS 6 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. TROPICAL CYCLONE OVERVIEW FOR 1991 11 3. REPORTS ON TROPICAL CYCLONES AFFECTING HONG KONG IN 1991 19 (a) Typhoon Zeke (9106): 9-14 July 20 (b) Typhoon Amy (9107): 16-19 July 24 (c) Severe Tropical Storm Brendan (9108): 20-24 July 28 (d) Typhoon Fred (9111): 13-l8 August 34 (e) Severe Tropical Storm Joel (9116): 3-7 September 40 (f) Typhoon Nat (9120): 16 September-2 October 44 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer
    ARCHIVES Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer M.A., Humboldt University Berlin (2008) Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2013 © Marie-Christine Meyer, MMXIII. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Certified by................................................. Irene Heim Professor of Linguistics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by..., .... .. .................................... David Pesetsky Professor of Linguistics Head of Department Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy on, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract In this thesis, I propose a new theory of implicature. I argue that the two main theories avail- able so far - the (Neo-)Gricean pragmatic theory on the one hand (e.g., Sauerland (2004)), and the hybrid grammatical theory of scalar implicatures on the other hand (e.g., Fox (2007)) - cannot provide a satisfactory account of disjunctions like Al drank some or all of the beers. As I will show, the meaning of these sentences is characterized by the presence of grammati- cal ignorance implicatures. In this they differ from their simpler alternatives. I will show how the proposed Matrix K theory of implicature derives this result. The new theory is a radically grammatical theory in that all kinds of implicatures - weak, scalar, and ignorance implica- tures - are derived in the grammar.
    [Show full text]