DOCSLIB.ORG

Snippetssnippets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snippetssnippets snippetssnippets Issue 37 - December 2019 Special issue in honor of Uli Sauerland Contents 1. Andreea C. Nicolae, Patrick D. Elliott, and Yasutada Sudo Introduction ................................................... ..................1 2. DorothyAhn ASL IX to locus as a modifier ................................................... ..2 3. Artemis Alexiadou Decomposing scalar approximatives in Greek ......................................4 4. Anna Alsop, Lucas Champollion, and Ioana Grosu A problem for Fox’s (2007) account of free choice disjunction ........................7 5. Anton Benz and Nicole Gotzner Quantifier irgendein and local implicature ........................................10 6. Jonathan David Bobaljik and Susi Wurmbrand Fake indexicals, binding, and the PCC ............................................13 7. Brian Buccola and Emmanuel Chemla Alternatives of disjunctions: when a disjunct contains the antecedent of a pronoun ....16 8. LukaCrnicˇ and Brian Buccola Scoping NPIs out of DPs ................................................... .....19 9. Chris Cummins Some contexts requiring precise number meanings .................................22 10. Patrick D. Elliott and Paul Marty Exactly one theory of multiplicity inferences .......................................24 11. Anamaria Fal˘ au¸sand˘ Andreea C. Nicolae Two coordinating particles are better than one: free choice items in Romanian ........27 12. DannyFox Individual concepts and narrow scope illusions ....................................30 13. DannyFox Degree concepts and narrow scope illusions .......................................33 14. Nicole Gotzner Disjunction, conjunction, and exhaustivity.........................................35 15. Martin Hackl On Haddock’s puzzle and the role of presupposition in reference resolution ...........37 16. Andreas Haida Symmetry, density, and formal alternatives ........................................40 17. Nina Haslinger and Viola Schmitt Strengthened disjunction or non-classical conjunction? .............................43 18. Fabian Heck and Anke Himmelreich Two observations about reconstruction............................................46 19. Aron Hirsch Modal adverbs and constraints on type-flexibility ..................................49 20. Natalia Ivlieva and Alexander Podobryaev On variable agreement and scope reconstruction in Russian ........................52 21. Hadil Karawani The past is rewritten ................................................... .........54 22. Manfred Krifka and Fereshteh Modarresi Persian ezafe and proportional quantifiers ........................................56 23. Paul Marty Maximize Presupposition! and presupposition satisfaction ..........................59 24. Lisa Matthewson, Sihwei Chen, Marianne Huijsmans, Marcin Morzycki, Daniel Reisinger, and Hotze Rullmann Restricting the English past tense.................................................61 25. Clemens Mayr On a seemingly nonexistent cumulative reading ....................................65 26. Marie-Christine Meyer Scalar Implicatures in complex contexts ...........................................67 27. Moreno Mitrovic´ Null disjunction in disguise ................................................... ...70 28. Andreea C. Nicolae and Yasutada Sudo The exhaustive relevance of complex conjunctions..................................72 29. Rick Nouwen Scalar vagueness regulation and locative reference.................................75 30. Robert Pasternak Unifying partitive and adjective-modifying percent.................................77 31. Hazel Pearson and Frank Sode ‘Not in my wildest dreams’: a part time minimizer? ................................80 32. Orin Percus Uli and our generation: some reminiscences.......................................82 33. Jacopo Romoli Why them? ................................................... ..................84 34. Fabienne Salfner The rise and fall of non-conservatives.............................................87 35. Petra B. Schumacher Vagueness and context-sensitivity of absolute gradable adjectives....................90 36. Stephanie Solt More or less an approximator ................................................... .93 37. Giorgos Spathas Plural anaphoric reference and non-conservativity .................................95 38. Benjamin Spector An argument for the trivalent approach to presupposition projection .................97 39. Bob van Tiel ‘The case against fuzzy logic revisited’ revisited ..................................100 40. LynTieu A developmental asymmetry between the singular and plural .......................103 41. TueTrinh A tense question ................................................... ............106 42. Hubert Truckenbrodt On remind-me presuppositions and embedded question acts........................108 43. Michael Wagner Disjuncts must be mutually excludable ...........................................111 44. E. Cameron Wilson Constraints on non-conservative readings in English ..............................114 45. Susi Wurmbrand Indexical shift meets ECM ................................................... ...117 ISSN 1590-1807 Published in Led on Line - Electronic Archive by LED - Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto - Milano - Italy https://www.ledonline.it December 2019 Copyright The works included in Snippets are the property of their authors and are used by permission. Readers must apply the same principles of fair use to the works in this electronic archive that they would to a printed archive. These works may be read online, downloaded and printed for personal use, copied and freely distributed, or the URL of Snippets included in another electronic document. Any reference to material included in Snippets must cite the author and the source. The texts may not be published commercially (in print or electronic form), edited, or otherwise altered without the permission of the author. Guest Editors Andreea C. Nicolae, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Patrick D. Elliott, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Yasutada Sudo, University College London Editors Sam Alxatib, Graduate Center, City University of New York Isaac Gould, Ewha Womans University Orin Percus, Université de Nantes Review Board Simon Charlow (Rutgers University), Christopher Davis (University of the Ryukyus), Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine (National University of Singapore), Ilaria Frana (Università degli Studi di Enna “Kore”), Daniel Gutzmann (University of Cologne), Laura Kalin (Princeton University), Peter Klecha (Swarthmore College), Marie-Christine Meyer (Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft), Neil Myler (Boston University), Michelle Sheehan (Anglia Ruskin University), Yasutada Sudo (University College London), Ayaka Sugawara (Waseda University), Gary Thoms (New York University), Maziar Toosarvandani (University of California, Santa Cruz), Wataru Uegaki (University of Edinburgh), Coppe van Urk (Queen Mary University of London), Alexis Wellwood (University of Southern California), Rebecca Woods (Newcastle University). Note: Submissions to this issue were reviewed anonymously by contributors to the issue. The guest editors would like to thank them for their help, as well as Sam Alxatib, Cory Bill, Winfried Lechner, Guillermo del Pinal, Jack Tomlinson, and Kazuko Yatsushiro. Email: [email protected] iv Editorial Statement 1. Purpose The aim of Snippets is to publish specific remarks that motivate research or that make theoretical points germane to current work. The ideal contribution is brief, self-contained and explicit. One encounters short comments of this kind in earlier literature in linguistics. We feel that there no longer is a forum for them. We want Snippets to help fill that gap. 2. Content We will publish notes that contribute to the study of syntax and semantics in generative grammar. The notes are to be brief, self-contained and explicit. They may do any of the following things: • point out an empirical phenomenon that challenges accepted generalizations or influential theoretical proposals; • point out unnoticed minimal pairs that fall outside the scope of any existing theory; • point out an empirical phenomenon that confirms the predictions of a theory in an area where the theory has not been tested; • explicitly describe technical inconsistencies in a theory or in a set of frequently adopted assumptions; • explicitly describe unnoticed assumptions that underlie a theory or assumptions that a theory needs to be supplemented with in order to make desired predictions; • call attention to little-known or forgotten literature in which issues of immediate relevance are discussed. We also encourage submissions that connect psycholinguistic data to theoretical issues. A proposal for a pilot experiment in language acquisition or language processing could make for an excellent snippet. The earliest Linguistic Inquiry squibs exemplify the kind of remark we would like to publish. Some of them posed unobserved puzzles. For instance, a squib by Postal and Ross in Linguis- tic Inquiry 1:1 (“A Problem of Adverb Preposing”) noted that whether or not we can construe a sentence-initial temporal adverb with an embedded verb depends on the tense of the matrix verb. A squib by Perlmutter and Ross in LI 1:3 (“Relative Clauses with Split Antecedents”), challenging the prevailing analyses of coordination and extraposition, noted that conjoined clauses, neither of which contains a plural noun phrase, can appear next to an “extraposed” relative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi OXFORD SURVEYS IN SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS general editors: Chris Barker, NewYorkUniversity, and Christopher Kennedy, University of Chicago advisory editors: Kent Bach, San Francisco State University; Jack Hoeksema, University of Groningen;LaurenceR.Horn,Yale University; William Ladusaw, University of California Santa Cruz; Richard Larson, Stony Brook University; Beth Levin, Stanford University;MarkSteedman,University of Edinburgh; Anna Szabolcsi, New York University; Gregory Ward, Northwestern University published Modality Paul Portner Reference Barbara Abbott Intonation and Meaning Daniel Büring Questions Veneeta Dayal Mood Paul Portner Inquisitive Semantics Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen in preparation Aspect Hana Filip Lexical Pragmatics Laurence R. Horn Conversational Implicature Yan Huang OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics IVANO CIARDELLI, JEROEN GROENENDIJK, AND FLORIS ROELOFSEN 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in Impression: Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms ofa Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives .
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Is Caring
    Master Thesis 30 hp (Vårterminen 2013) Submitted May 27th 2013 #SharingIsCaring: An Exploratory Study of Content of Tweets, Situation of Tweeting and Motivations to Use Twitter while Watching Television Series By Linda Isabelle Skibbe Supervisor: Sven Ross Stockholm University - Department for Media Studies I Abstract I. Abstract The internet and social media have had a significant impact on recipients’ media consumption. As the converging media environment recipients face today offers not only more media products but also new practices of using certain media products, this study focuses on how the social micro-blogging service Twitter impacts the watching of television series. The presented study aims at explaining a new form of media reception by employing a multi- method approach. A content analysis case study of tweets about the US-American series “Homeland” and the German series “Tatort” will give insight into the Twitter content on two different series. Further, qualitative semi-standardized interviews and a survey will shed light on the situational aspects and motivational factors to use Twitter while watching television series. The uses and gratification theory is used as a backdrop to study the motivations to use Twitter while watching television series. The results of the content analysis on the two series indicate that there is a strong focus on the series itself within the tweets. Nevertheless, both series provide somewhat differing Twitter content. While tweets on “Tatort” are more critical and realistic towards the series, tweets about “Homeland” are more likely to be referential. The situation of tweeting while watching television series seems to be characterized by the usage of a second screen.
    [Show full text]
  • The War and Fashion
    F a s h i o n , S o c i e t y , a n d t h e First World War i ii Fashion, Society, and the First World War International Perspectives E d i t e d b y M a u d e B a s s - K r u e g e r , H a y l e y E d w a r d s - D u j a r d i n , a n d S o p h i e K u r k d j i a n iii BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2021 Selection, editorial matter, Introduction © Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian, 2021 Individual chapters © their Authors, 2021 Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identifi ed as Editors of this work. For legal purposes the Acknowledgments on p. xiii constitute an extension of this copyright page. Cover design by Adriana Brioso Cover image: Two women wearing a Poiret military coat, c.1915. Postcard from authors’ personal collection. This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third- party websites referred to or in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalar Implicatures Under Uncertainty
    Scalar implicatures under uncertainty by Cathy Agyemang A thesis submitted to the Institute of Cognitive Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Cognitive Science in Cognitive Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2020 Cathy Agyemang ii Abstract Studies on judgments under uncertainty argue that individuals reason about the likelihoods of events in ways that are inconsistent with the basic axioms of probability. However, such studies fail to consider that the information expressed can be ambiguous between literal and strengthened meanings, through scalar impli- catures. Under a literal interpretation, intuitive judgments may appear to violate the rules of probability. However, scalar implicatures change meanings, such that, probability theory alone does not determine how people make judgments. Instead, individuals rely on experience, prior knowledge and other cognitive fac- tors. I examine the availability of scalar implicatures under uncertainty and its influence on perceived event likelihood. Comparing contexts where an implicature is available to where it is not, I present evidence that violations of probability theory occur only in conditions where scalar implicatures are available. Thus, prob- abilistic judgments must also consider how individuals apply conversational reasoning in order to resolve uncertainty. iii Acknowledgments Completing my Master’s was an incredibly humbling experience. This work would not have been at all pos- sible without the efforts of many people. To avoid waxing poetic, I will briefly acknowledge the contributions of some of these individuals here. First, I would like to thank my thesis committee, Deepthi Kamawar, Ida Toivonen and Ai Taniguchi for their careful consideration of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Logics of Synonymy
    Journal of Philosophical Logic (2020) 49:767–805 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09537-5 Logics of Synonymy Levin Hornischer1 Received: 30 October 2018 / Accepted: 14 November 2019 /Published online: 9 January 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract We investigate synonymy in the strong sense of content identity (and not just meaning similarity). This notion is central in the philosophy of language and in applications of logic. We motivate, uniformly axiomatize, and characterize several “benchmark” notions of synonymy in the messy class of all possible notions of synonymy. This class is divided by two intuitive principles that are governed by a no-go result. We use the notion of a scenario to get a logic of synonymy (SF) which is the canonical rep- resentative of one division. In the other division, the so-called conceptivist logics, we find, e.g., the well-known system of analytic containment (AC). We axiomatize four logics of synonymy extending AC, relate them semantically and proof-theoretically to SF, and characterize them in terms of weak/strong subject matter preservation and weak/strong logical equivalence. This yields ways out of the no-go result and novel arguments—independent of a particular semantic framework—for each notion of synonymy discussed (using, e.g., Hurford disjunctions or homotopy theory). This points to pluralism about meaning and a certain non-compositionality of truth in logic programs and neural networks. And it unveils an impossibility for synonymy: if it is to preserve subject matter, then either conjunction and disjunction lose an essential property or a very weak absorption law is violated.
    [Show full text]
  • Boban Arsijenevic
    Syntactic, semantic and methodological aspects of an expanded ontology in the modal and attitudinal domain1 1. Introduction In the target paper, Moltmann has a twofold goal. She argues for the replacement of possible world semantics by object-based truthmaker semantics in the modelling of attitudinal and modal natural language expressions, and for the introduction of two novel ontological classes for this purpose: modal and attitudinal objects. After outlining the standard view and the main components of the proposed alternative, the paper examines different concrete types of attitudinal and modal expressions which have presented problems for the standard theory, presenting their analysis in the proposed approach, and pointing out the advantages of the latter. Overall, Moltmann’s approach gives a much tighter semantics of modal and attitudinal meanings. Her general preference is for simplex items over complex representations: truthmakers over clauses specifying truth conditions, attitudinal and modal objects over possible-world predicates, attitudinal-and-modal-object predicates over orderings and divisions among possible worlds as attitudinal and modal bases. In all these cases, it is the expansion of ontology that is chosen over deriving the observed phenomena from a minimal ontology. Most prominently, she adds the ontological classes of attitudinal and modal objects, which get further divided into subclasses too, when it turns out that different attitudes or modalities trigger different linguistic effects. This enables her to model attitudinal and modal nuances (beliefs, doubts, claims, suggestions, i.e. permissions, obligations, possibilities, necessities) by assigning each of them a corresponding predicate. Instead of e.g. an existential quantification over Mary-leaving situations within the domain of situations that comply with deontic requirements – in order to capture the semantic nuance of permission, she directly predicates of a modal object that it is a weak or strong permission, and that its truthmaking is determined by the clause Mary is leaving.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerals and Their Modifiers: How Morphology Constrains Alternatives
    Numerals and their modifiers: How morphology constrains alternatives Teodora Mihoc Draft of May 16, 2018 Abstract Bare numerals (three), comparative-modified numerals (more/less than three), and superlative- modified numerals (at most/least three) differ in crucial ways with respect to bounding entailments, scalar implicatures, ignorance implicatures, and acceptability in downward-entailing environments. Many important strides have been made in deriving various subsets of their patterns, yet we still lack a unified account. In this paper I show that the key to such an account lies with the proper understand- ing of the contribution of the morphological pieces of these items – the numeral, much/little, and the comparative/superlative morpheme. From this we can not only obtain truth conditions that straight- forwardly capture just the right bounding entailments for each item, but we can also naturally derive scalar and domain alternatives that yield just the desired scalar implicature, ignorance implicature, and acceptability in downward-entailing environments patterns. The account naturally shares features with existing alternative-based accounts of numerals, especially that of Spector(2015), but improves both empirically and conceptually on them all. Keywords numerals, comparative, superlative, extents, scalar alternatives, domain alternatives, ex- haustification, polarity 1 Introduction Bare numerals (three; henceforth, BNs), comparative-modified numerals (more/less than three; hence- forth, CMs), and superlative-modified numerals (at most/least three; henceforth SMs) are similar and different in interesting ways. There have been many theories trying to capture their behavior. At the same time I believe that none of the existing theories gets right all of the basic features of these items that we may like to understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Theater As a Vehicle for Change, Inspired by the Poetic Performances of Ancient Andalucía
    MY HEART IS IN THE EAST: EXPLORING THEATER AS A VEHICLE FOR CHANGE, INSPIRED BY THE POETIC PERFORMANCES OF ANCIENT ANDALUCÍA JESSICA LITWAK A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Ph.D. in Leadership and Change Program of Antioch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2015 This is to certify that the Dissertation entitled: MY HEART IS IN THE EAST: EXPLORING THEATER AS A VEHICLE FOR CHANGE, INSPIRED BY THE POETIC PERFORMANCES OF ANCIENT ANDALUCÍA prepared by Jessica Litwak is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership and Change Approved by: Carolyn Kenny, Ph.D., Chair date Elizabeth Holloway, Ph.D., Committee Member date D. Soyini Madison, Ph.D., Committee Member date Dara Culhane, Ph.D., Committee Member date Magdalena Kazubowski-Houston, Ph.D., External Reader date Copyright 2015 Jessica Litwak All rights reserved Acknowledgments No theater project is ever created or produced out by one person. No scholarly work comes out of one mind. No community action is a solo endeavor. The following people have believed in my vision and have edged me toward the completion of this project through many challenges. Their support emotionally, intellectually, and artistically enabled this dissertation to reach fruition. Dr. Carolyn Kenny—A sword in the clouds, an iron orchid, a compassionate warrior and a mother lion, Carolyn was my North Star, my Sherpa, my champion, and my challenger. Without her guidance, this dissertation simply would not have been conceived, written, and finished. During hours of doubt or darkness she offered hope in the form of scholarly articles, poems, stories, parables, gentle scolding, and vigorous pep talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer
    ARCHIVES Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer M.A., Humboldt University Berlin (2008) Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2013 © Marie-Christine Meyer, MMXIII. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Certified by................................................. Irene Heim Professor of Linguistics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by..., .... .. .................................... David Pesetsky Professor of Linguistics Head of Department Ignorance and Grammar by Marie-Christine Meyer Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy on, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract In this thesis, I propose a new theory of implicature. I argue that the two main theories avail- able so far - the (Neo-)Gricean pragmatic theory on the one hand (e.g., Sauerland (2004)), and the hybrid grammatical theory of scalar implicatures on the other hand (e.g., Fox (2007)) - cannot provide a satisfactory account of disjunctions like Al drank some or all of the beers. As I will show, the meaning of these sentences is characterized by the presence of grammati- cal ignorance implicatures. In this they differ from their simpler alternatives. I will show how the proposed Matrix K theory of implicature derives this result. The new theory is a radically grammatical theory in that all kinds of implicatures - weak, scalar, and ignorance implica- tures - are derived in the grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • Training and Timing Local Scalar Enrichments Under Global Pragmatic Pressures
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Training and timing local scalar enrichments under global pragmatic pressures Citation for published version: Chemla, E, Cummins, C & Singh, R 2016, 'Training and timing local scalar enrichments under global pragmatic pressures', Journal of Semantics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw006 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1093/jos/ffw006 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Journal of Semantics Publisher Rights Statement: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in 'Journal of Semantics' following peer review. The version of record 'Emmanuel Chemla, Chris Cummins, Raj Singh; Training and Timing Local Scalar Enrichments under Global Pragmatic Pressures. J Semant 2017; 34 (1): 107-126', is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw006. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
    HEARING OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the Homeland: Six Years After 9/11 WITNESSES: MR. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS); MR. MIKE McCONNELL, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (DNI); MR. ROBERT S. MUELLER, III – DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI); VADM JOHN “SCOTT” REDD, U.S. NAVY (RET.) – DIRECTOR, NATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER (NCTC) CHAIRED BY: SENATOR JOE LIEBERMAN (I-CT) LOCATION: 342 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 9:34 A.M. EDT DATE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 SEN. LIEBERMAN: (Strikes gavel.) The hearing will come to order. I thank everyone who's here, including, of course, our four witnesses. Tomorrow, September 11th, 2007, people across our nation and in fact in many places around the world will pause to mourn and reflect on the terrorist acts -- attacks of September 11th, 2001. Today, in this committee room, we rededicate ourselves to the memories of those lost and the families and the nation that grieve for them. Today we take time to assess the continuing Islamist terrorist threat to America and what our government is doing to protect the American people from an attack like the one that occurred six years ago. Today we ask what lessons were learned, where do we stand in our ability to detect and deter the next attack that we know is being plotted, and is our government ready to respond effectively to mitigate the damage to our citizens and our way of life, should another terrorist attack be carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Keep It Down
    COVER STORY..............................................................2 The Sentinel FEATURE STORY...........................................................3 SPORTS.....................................................................4 MOVIES............................................................8 - 22 WORD SEARCH/ CABLE GUIDE.......................................10 COOKING HIGHLIGHTS..................................................12 SUDOKU..................................................................13 tvweek STARS ON SCREEN/Q&A..............................................23 December 25 - 31, 2016 Keep it down Noah Wyle as seen in “The Librarians” Ewing Brothers 2 x 3 ad www.Since1853.com While the rest of the team sets out to recover the Eye of Ra and solve the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle, Flynn (Noah Wyle, “ER”) learns a great deal about himself in a new episode of “The Librarians,” airing Sunday, 630 South Hanover Street Dec. 25, on TNT. The series follows a group of Librarians tasked with retrieving powerful artifacts, solving Carlisle•7 17-2 4 3-2421 mysteries and battling supernatural threats to mankind. Rebecca Romijn (“X-Men,” 2000) and Christian Kane Steven A. Ewing, FD, Supervisor, Owner (“Leverage”) also star. 2 DECEMBER 24 CARLISLE SENTINEL cover story the other Librarians on their The other members of the many harrowing adventures. team each possess unique skills Stacks of thrills However, now that she and that help them on their many Carsen are romantically in- quests. Kane is Oklahoma-born Season 3 of ‘The Librarians’ in full swing on TNT volved, she struggles to keep cowboy Jacob Stone, the per- her feelings for him from get- fect combination of brains and By Kyla Brewer The big news this season is ting in the way of her duty to brawn, thanks to his knowledge TV Media the return of Noah Wyle, who protect the others. of art, architecture and history.
    [Show full text]