Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, Spi
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi OXFORD SURVEYS IN SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS general editors: Chris Barker, NewYorkUniversity, and Christopher Kennedy, University of Chicago advisory editors: Kent Bach, San Francisco State University; Jack Hoeksema, University of Groningen;LaurenceR.Horn,Yale University; William Ladusaw, University of California Santa Cruz; Richard Larson, Stony Brook University; Beth Levin, Stanford University;MarkSteedman,University of Edinburgh; Anna Szabolcsi, New York University; Gregory Ward, Northwestern University published Modality Paul Portner Reference Barbara Abbott Intonation and Meaning Daniel Büring Questions Veneeta Dayal Mood Paul Portner Inquisitive Semantics Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen in preparation Aspect Hana Filip Lexical Pragmatics Laurence R. Horn Conversational Implicature Yan Huang OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Inquisitive Semantics IVANO CIARDELLI, JEROEN GROENENDIJK, AND FLORIS ROELOFSEN 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in Impression: Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms ofa Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives . International licence (CC BY-NC-ND .), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/./. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of this licence should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press Madison Avenue, New York, NY , United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: ISBN –––– (hbk.) –––– (pbk.) Printedandboundby CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, cr yy Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work. OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Contents General preface vii Acknowledgments ix Sources xi . Introduction .. Motivation .. Main aims and outline of the book . Basic notions .. The standard picture .. Information states .. Issues .. Propositions .. Contexts .. Summary and pointers to possible refinements .. Exercises . Basic operations on propositions .. Algebraic operations .. Projection operators .. Linguistic relevance .. Exercises . A first-order inquisitive semantics .. Logical language and models .. Semantics .. Semantic categories and projection operators .. Examples .. Informative content, truth, and support .. Syntactic properties of non-hybrid sentences .. Sources of inquisitiveness .. Comparison with alternative semantics .. Exercises . Questions .. Polar questions .. Alternative questions OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi vi contents .. Open disjunctive questions .. Wh-questions .. Question coordination and conditionalization .. Limitations and extensions .. Exercises . Disjunction, clause typing, and intonation .. List structures .. Logical forms .. Interpreting logical forms .. Unmarked cases .. Marked cases .. Exercises . Conditionals .. Evidence for truth-conditional effects .. Conditionals in inquisitive semantics .. Further benefits .. Summary .. Exercises . Propositional attitudes .. Propositional attitudes: the standard account .. Inquisitive epistemic logic .. Beyond know and wonder .. Pointers to further work .. Exercises . Comparison to alternative approaches .. Alternative semantics .. Partition semantics .. Inquisitive indifference semantics .. Division of labor .. Exercises . Conclusion .. Overview of main concepts .. Mission accomplished? References Further reading Index OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi General preface Oxford Surveys in Semantics and Pragmatics aims to convey to the reader the life and spirit of the study of meaning in natural language. Its volumes provide distillations of the central empirical questions driving research in contemporary semantics and pragmatics, and distinguish the most important lines of inquiry into these questions. Each volume offers the reader an overview of the topic at hand, a critical survey of the major approaches to it, and an assessment of what consensus (if any) exists. By putting empirical puzzles and theoretical debates into a comprehensible perspective, each author seeks to provide orien- tation and direction to the topic, thereby providing the context for a deeper understanding of both the complexity of the phenomena and the crucial features of the semantic and pragmatic theories designed to explain them. The books in the series offer researchers in linguis- tics and related areas—including syntax, cognitive science, computer science, and philosophy—both a valuable resource for instruction and reference and a state-of-the-art perspective on contemporary semantic and pragmatic theory from the experts shaping the field. In this volume, Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen provide the first comprehensive introduction to Inquisitive Semantics, a theory of linguistic meaning that aims to unify the analysis of declarative and interrogative sentences. Unlike traditional models of meaning, which distinguish declaratives and interrogatives either in terms of semantic type or in terms of force, Inquisitive Semantics builds an integrated analysis of both sentence types around a particular formalization of information states, called “issues.” In the first part of this book, Ciardelli, Groenendijk, and Roelofsen lay out the formal foundations of the theory, showing how it provides a general representation of semantic content and conversational contexts. In the second part, they demonstrate the generality of the framework by first applying it to the analysis of multiple types of interrogatives, extending it to the analysis of disjunction, conditionals and propositional attitudes, and finally comparing it to previous analyses of questions. With its clear exposition, detailed formalization, substantive discussion of empirical phenomena, and carefully constructed exercises in inquisitive OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi viii general preface semantic analysis, this book provides newcomers to the framework with a much-needed introduction, and experienced researchers with a valuable resource for further exploring its applications. Chris Barker New York University Christopher Kennedy University of Chicago OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Acknowledgments ThisbookhasgrownoutoflecturenotesforcoursesattheEuropeanand North American Summer Schools in Logic, Language, and Information (ESSLLI and NASSLLI ), as well as yearly instalments of the course Logic and Conversation at the University of Amsterdam (–). We are very grateful to the students and colleagues who attended these courses and provided insightful feedback. We are espe- cially grateful to Lucas Champollion, Donka Farkas, and Anna Szabolcsi for comments on various parts of the book that led to considerable improvements. Manypeoplehavecontributedtothedevelopmentoftheframework presented here, as will be witnessed by numerous references throughout the book. In particular, Chapters and have grown out of close collab- orations with Donka Farkas and with Lucas Champollion and Linmin Zhang, respectively. These collaborations have been instrumental in shaping the overall argument presented in the book. We are very grateful to three anonymous OUP book reviewers for detailed, constructive feedback on the submitted version of the book manuscript, and to the OUP editorial staff for their help in the publica- tion process. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, grant numbers -- and --) and the European Research Council (ERC, grant number ). OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, //, SPi Sources Many of the papers referred to in this book can be accessed through www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/papers. Some computational tools that might help the reader to become familiar with the framework pre- sented in the book are available at www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/ resources. Thisbookbringstogetheranumberofideasandresultsfrompre- vious publications, manuscripts, and teaching materials. Below we list the main sources for each chapter, which in some cases contain more comprehensive discussion of the ideas presented here. • Chapter : Ciardelli, Groenendijk, and Roelofsen (a) • Chapter : Roelofsen (a) • Chapter : Ciardelli (); Groenendijk and Roelofsen (); Ciardelli and Roelofsen ();