The Economist's Free E-Mail Newsletters Twist and Shout and Alerts

Thursday September 1st 2011

World politics Business & finance Economics Science & technology Culture Blogs Debate & discuss Multimedia Print edition

Fusion power Be the first to comment Print

Next ITERation? E-mail Reprints & permissions Generating electricity by nuclear fusion has long looked like a chimera. A reactor being built in Germany may change that Advertisement Sep 3rd 2011 | from the print edition Like 3 7

Most commented Most recommended

1. China's military power: Modernisation in sheep's clothing 2. Charlemagne: Among the dinosaurs 3. Anti-corruption protests in India: No modern-day AS THE old joke has it, fusion is the power of the future—and always will be. The sales Mahatma pitch is irresistible: the principal fuel, a heavy isotope of hydrogen called deuterium, 4. German business and politics: Goodbye to Berlin can be extracted from water. In effect, therefore, it is in limitless supply. Nor, unlike 5. Libya: The birth of free Libya fusion’s cousin, nuclear fission, does the process produce much in the way of 6. Immigration: Let them come radioactive waste. It does not release carbon dioxide, either. Which all sounds too good 7. Climate science (II): Clouds in a jar to be true. And it is. For there is the little matter of building a reactor that can run for 8. Language learning: No, she's foreign! long enough to turn out a meaningful amount of electricity. Since the first attempt to do 9. Martin Luther King: A blockheaded memorial so, a machine called Zeta that was constructed in Britain in the 1950s, no one has even 10. The world economy: A call to arms come close. Over the past five days

At the moment, the main bet being placed by fusion enthusiasts is on ITER, the Advertisement International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, a research machine that can hold 840 cubic metres of hot, gaseous fuel. It is being bolted together at a projected cost of !15 billion ($22 billion) in the south of France. ITER is what is known as a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device invented in Russia at about the same time Zeta was active. Deuterium (along with an even heavier hydrogen isotope called tritium, which is made by bombarding either deuterium or lithium with neutrons) is injected into the doughnut, heated to the point at which its electrons break free and it forms a plasma, and squeezed by magnetic fields.

If the speed of the nuclei (a consequence of their temperature) and their density (a consequence of the In this section magnetic squeezing) can both be made high enough, that » Next ITERation? will overcome the mutual repulsion of the nuclei’s positive Please be seated electric charges. This allows a short-range phenomenon Gut instinct called the strong nuclear force to take over and causes the nuclei to merge and form helium. The fusion of deuterium Backwards and forwards Latest blog posts - All times are GMT and tritium into helium in this way releases energy—enough Reprints of it, in theory, both to power the reactor and to yield a The rising cost of a night in Istanbul From Gulliver - 23 mins ago surplus that can be converted into electricity. It also A blockage for the package? releases neutrons, which engineers hope to use to make tritium and thus close the fuel From Newsbook - 26 mins ago cycle. The importance of up-to-date propaganda sculpture From Democracy in America - 1 hour 24 mins ago Unfortunately, there is a fundamental snag. The shape of the reactor means that the The secret to growth magnetic field which does the squeezing (and thus also keeps the superhot plasma From Free exchange - 1 hour 50 mins ago away from the walls) produces different forces in the inner and outer parts of the Bourgeois and proud doughnut. That would result in a turbulent release of plasma if it were not counteracted From Daily chart - 1 hour 51 mins ago by a second magnetic field created by an electric current induced in the plasma itself. Germany falling From Buttonwood's notebook - 2 hours 42 mins ago

The problem is that sustaining this second current is hard, and if its level varies too Boarding school much, the system breaks down. That means the reactor is constantly starting and From Gulliver - 2 hours 44 mins ago stopping. This is not a tenable arrangement for a commercial power station. One of More from our blogs » ITER’s goals is to get the length of individual runs up to 50 minutes. (In ITER’s predecessor, the Joint European Torus, runs lasted for a matter of seconds.) Even that, though, is not really satisfactory. Hence the interest in another reactor design, the Products & events stellarator, a rival to the tokamak which fell behind in the 1960s but which is now Stay informed today and every day making a comeback. Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters Twist and shout and alerts. Get e-mail newsletters A stellarator is a tokamak with twists in it. The consequence of its Daliesque geometry is that every particle inside the machine experiences the same forces as it travels Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on around. A stellarator therefore needs only one magnetic field to manage the plasma, Twitter and can be run indefinitely rather than just for a few minutes. Follow The Economist on Twitter

The reason stellarators fell out of fashion was that their magnetic fields used to leak See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, plasma faster than those of a tokamak. That, however, is no longer the case. The latest topical videos and debates on Facebook. stellarators have their magnetic-field-inducing coils sculpted into complex shapes, so as Follow The Economist on Facebook to ensure that forces are uniformly distributed. Unlike their predecessors from the 1960s, modern computers can handle the complex calculations required to come up Advertisement with the right shapes.

The Wendelstein 7-AS, a tiddler with a fuel capacity of but a single cubic metre, was built by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics at Garching, Germany, and operated from 1988 to 2002. An analysis of its performance showed its containment capacity did, indeed, match a tokamak’s. As a result, the 7-AS is being followed by a larger machine, the Wendelstein 7-X, which is being built (see photograph on previous page) by the Max Planck Institute in Greifswald and has a capacity of 30 cubic metres.

The 7-X will cost !377m, to be provided by the German government, the local state government, the European Union—and, since July, by America’s Department of Energy, which agreed to supply $7.5m-worth of magnets, wall cladding and measuring instruments as its contribution. Although nowhere near the size of ITER, the Wendelstein 7-X is still a substantial machine. It should show whether stellarators can be scaled up to a useful size. If they can then, just possibly, the old quip will be shown to be wrong—and the future of fusion might actually arrive. from the print edition | Science and Technology

Recommend Like 3 7 Share 1 Submit to reddit

Be the first to comment

Want more? Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis.

Classified ads

About The Economist online About The Economist Media directory Staff books Career opportunities Contact us Subscribe [+] Site feedback