DOCSLIB.ORG

The Economist's Free E-Mail Newsletters Twist and Shout and Alerts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Economist's Free E-Mail Newsletters Twist and Shout and Alerts Log in Register My account Subscribe Digital & mobile Newsletters RSS Jobs Help Thursday September 1st 2011 Search World politics Business & finance Economics Science & technology Culture Blogs Debate & discuss Multimedia Print edition Fusion power Be the first to comment Print Next ITERation? E-mail Reprints & permissions Generating electricity by nuclear fusion has long looked like a chimera. A reactor being built in Germany may change that Advertisement Sep 3rd 2011 | from the print edition Like 3 7 Most commented Most recommended 1. China's military power: Modernisation in sheep's clothing 2. Charlemagne: Among the dinosaurs 3. Anti-corruption protests in India: No modern-day AS THE old joke has it, fusion is the power of the future—and always will be. The sales Mahatma pitch is irresistible: the principal fuel, a heavy isotope of hydrogen called deuterium, 4. German business and politics: Goodbye to Berlin can be extracted from water. In effect, therefore, it is in limitless supply. Nor, unlike 5. Libya: The birth of free Libya fusion’s cousin, nuclear fission, does the process produce much in the way of 6. Immigration: Let them come radioactive waste. It does not release carbon dioxide, either. Which all sounds too good 7. Climate science (II): Clouds in a jar to be true. And it is. For there is the little matter of building a reactor that can run for 8. Language learning: No, she's foreign! long enough to turn out a meaningful amount of electricity. Since the first attempt to do 9. Martin Luther King: A blockheaded memorial so, a machine called Zeta that was constructed in Britain in the 1950s, no one has even 10. The world economy: A call to arms come close. Over the past five days At the moment, the main bet being placed by fusion enthusiasts is on ITER, the Advertisement International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, a research machine that can hold 840 cubic metres of hot, gaseous fuel. It is being bolted together at a projected cost of !15 billion ($22 billion) in the south of France. ITER is what is known as a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device invented in Russia at about the same time Zeta was active. Deuterium (along with an even heavier hydrogen isotope called tritium, which is made by bombarding either deuterium or lithium with neutrons) is injected into the doughnut, heated to the point at which its electrons break free and it forms a plasma, and squeezed by magnetic fields. If the speed of the nuclei (a consequence of their temperature) and their density (a consequence of the In this section magnetic squeezing) can both be made high enough, that » Next ITERation? will overcome the mutual repulsion of the nuclei’s positive Please be seated electric charges. This allows a short-range phenomenon Gut instinct called the strong nuclear force to take over and causes the nuclei to merge and form helium. The fusion of deuterium Backwards and forwards Latest blog posts - All times are GMT and tritium into helium in this way releases energy—enough Reprints of it, in theory, both to power the reactor and to yield a The rising cost of a night in Istanbul From Gulliver - 23 mins ago surplus that can be converted into electricity. It also A blockage for the package? releases neutrons, which engineers hope to use to make tritium and thus close the fuel From Newsbook - 26 mins ago cycle. The importance of up-to-date propaganda sculpture From Democracy in America - 1 hour 24 mins ago Unfortunately, there is a fundamental snag. The shape of the reactor means that the The secret to growth magnetic field which does the squeezing (and thus also keeps the superhot plasma From Free exchange - 1 hour 50 mins ago away from the walls) produces different forces in the inner and outer parts of the Bourgeois and proud doughnut. That would result in a turbulent release of plasma if it were not counteracted From Daily chart - 1 hour 51 mins ago by a second magnetic field created by an electric current induced in the plasma itself. Germany falling From Buttonwood's notebook - 2 hours 42 mins ago The problem is that sustaining this second current is hard, and if its level varies too Boarding school much, the system breaks down. That means the reactor is constantly starting and From Gulliver - 2 hours 44 mins ago stopping. This is not a tenable arrangement for a commercial power station. One of More from our blogs » ITER’s goals is to get the length of individual runs up to 50 minutes. (In ITER’s predecessor, the Joint European Torus, runs lasted for a matter of seconds.) Even that, though, is not really satisfactory. Hence the interest in another reactor design, the Products & events stellarator, a rival to the tokamak which fell behind in the 1960s but which is now Stay informed today and every day making a comeback. Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters Twist and shout and alerts. Get e-mail newsletters A stellarator is a tokamak with twists in it. The consequence of its Daliesque geometry is that every particle inside the machine experiences the same forces as it travels Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on around. A stellarator therefore needs only one magnetic field to manage the plasma, Twitter and can be run indefinitely rather than just for a few minutes. Follow The Economist on Twitter The reason stellarators fell out of fashion was that their magnetic fields used to leak See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, plasma faster than those of a tokamak. That, however, is no longer the case. The latest topical videos and debates on Facebook. stellarators have their magnetic-field-inducing coils sculpted into complex shapes, so as Follow The Economist on Facebook to ensure that forces are uniformly distributed. Unlike their predecessors from the 1960s, modern computers can handle the complex calculations required to come up Advertisement with the right shapes. The Wendelstein 7-AS, a tiddler with a fuel capacity of but a single cubic metre, was built by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics at Garching, Germany, and operated from 1988 to 2002. An analysis of its performance showed its containment capacity did, indeed, match a tokamak’s. As a result, the 7-AS is being followed by a larger machine, the Wendelstein 7-X, which is being built (see photograph on previous page) by the Max Planck Institute in Greifswald and has a capacity of 30 cubic metres. The 7-X will cost !377m, to be provided by the German government, the local state government, the European Union—and, since July, by America’s Department of Energy, which agreed to supply $7.5m-worth of magnets, wall cladding and measuring instruments as its contribution. Although nowhere near the size of ITER, the Wendelstein 7-X is still a substantial machine. It should show whether stellarators can be scaled up to a useful size. If they can then, just possibly, the old quip will be shown to be wrong—and the future of fusion might actually arrive. from the print edition | Science and Technology Recommend Like 3 7 Share 1 Submit to reddit Be the first to comment Want more? Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis. Classified ads About The Economist online About The Economist Media directory Staff books Career opportunities Contact us Subscribe [+] Site feedback Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2011. All rights reserved. Advertising info Legal disclaimer Accessibility Privacy policy Terms of use Help.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Controlled Nuclear Fusion
    Controlled Nuclear Fusion HANNAH SILVER, SPENCER LUKE, PETER TING, ADAM BARRETT, TORY TILTON, GABE KARP, TIMOTHY BERWIND Nuclear Fusion Thermonuclear fusion is the process by which nuclei of low atomic weight such as hydrogen combine to form nuclei of higher atomic weight such as helium. two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium (composed of a hydrogen nucleus containing one neutrons and one proton) and tritium (a hydrogen nucleus containing two neutrons and one proton), provide the most energetically favorable fusion reactants. in the fusion process, some of the mass of the original nuclei is lost and transformed to energy in the form of high-energy particles. energy from fusion reactions is the most basic form of energy in the universe; our sun and all other stars produce energy through thermonuclear fusion reactions. Nuclear Fusion Overview Two nuclei fuse together to form one larger nucleus Fusion occurs in the sun, supernovae explosion, and right after the big bang Occurs in the stars Initially, research failed Nuclear weapon research renewed interest The Science of Nuclear Fusion Fusion in stars is mostly of hydrogen (H1 & H2) Electrically charged hydrogen atoms repel each other. The heat from stars speeds up hydrogen atoms Nuclei move so fast, they push through the repulsive electric force Reaction creates radiant & thermal energy Controlled Fusion uses two main elements Deuterium is found in sea water and can be extracted using sea water Tritium can be made from lithium When the thermal energy output exceeds input, the equation is self-sustaining and called a thermonuclear reaction 1929 1939 1954 1976 1988 1993 2003 Prediction Quantitativ ZETA JET Project Japanese Princeton ITER using e=mc2, e theory Tokomak Generates that energy explaining 10 from fusion is fusion.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Issue No. 7 September 2017
    NEWSLETTER September 2017 Issue no. 7 Nuclear Industry Group Newsletter September 2017 Contents Notes from the Chair ................................................................................... 3 IOP Group Officers Forum .......................................................................... 4 NIG Committee Elections ............................................................................ 6 Nuclear Industry Group Career Contribution Prize 2017 .......................... 7 Event – Gen IV Reactors by Richard Stainsby (NNL) ................................ 8 Event – Nuclear Security by Robert Rodger (NNL) and Graham Urwin (RWM) ......................................................................................................... 12 Event – The UK’s Nuclear Future by Dame Sue Ion ................................ 13 Event – Regulatory Challenges for Nuclear New Build by Mike Finnerty. .................................................................................................................... 15 Event – European Nuclear Young Generation Forum ............................. 18 Event – Nuclear Fusion, 60 Years on from ZETA by Chris Warrick (UKAEA), Kate Lancaster (York Plasma Institute), David Kingham (Tokamak Energy) and Ian Chapman (UKAEA) ....................................... 19 IOP Materials and Characterisation Group Meetings .............................. 25 “Brexatom” – the implications of the withdrawal for the UK from the Euratom Treaty. ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De
    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Years of Fusion Research
    “50” Years of Fusion Research Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ Independent Activities Period (IAP) January 19, 2011 MIT PSFC Cambridge, MA 02139 1 FiFusion Fi FiPre Powers th thSe Sun “We nee d to see if we can mak e f usi on work .” John Holdren @MIT, April, 2009 3 Toroidal Magg(netic Confinement (1940s-earlyy) 50s) • 1940s - first ideas on using a magnetic field to confine a hot plasma for fusion. • 1947 Sir G.P. Thomson and P. C. Thonemann began classified investigations of toroidal “pinch” RF discharge, eventually lead to ZETA, a large pinch at Harwell, England 1956. • 1949 Richter in Argentina issues Press Release proclaiming fusion, turns out to be bogus, but news piques Spitzer’s interest. • 1950 Spitzer conceives stellarator while on a ski lift, and makes ppproposal to AEC ($50k )-initiates Project Matterhorn at Princeton. • 1950s Classified US Program on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (Project Sherwood) carried out until 1958 when magnetic fusion research was declassified. US and others unveil results at 2nd UN Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva 1958. Fusion Leading to 1958 Geneva Meeting • A period of rapid progress in science and technology – N-weapons, N-submarine, Fission energy, Sputnik, transistor, .... • Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion had great potential – Much optimism in the early 1950s with expectation for a quick solution – Political support and pressure for quick results (but bud gets were low, $56M for 1951-1958) – Many very “innovative” approaches were put forward. – Early fusion reactor concepts - Tamm/Sakharov, Spitzer (Model D) very large. • Reality began to set in by the mid 1950s – Coll ectiv e eff ects - MHD instability ( 195 4), Bo hm d iffus io n was ubi qui tous – Meager plasma physics understanding led to trial and error approaches – A multitude of experiments were tried and ended up far from fusion conditions – Magnetic Fusion research in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ITER Session at the IAEA Fusion Energy Conferencexa304 3
    ITER activities in 2003 is expected to be on the same level as in previous years, It was reported that the mandate of the Russian delegation to participate in the Negotiations in 2003 is expected to be approved soon by the Government. The RF delegation also reported that they had received informal enquiries from the Republic of Korea about possible participation in ITER. Dr. S. Matsuda, Moderator of the Fifth Meeting of the Negotiations Standing Sub-Group (NSSG-5, held in Rokkasho-mura on 7-9 October 2002) introduced the progress report of the NSSG. The delegations noted the progress report from the NSSG on the Joint Assessment of Specific Sites (JASS). The joint assessment of the Japanese site at Rokkasho-mura was conducted on 2-5 October 2002. This followed the assessment in September of the proposed Canadian site at Clarington. With the successful conduct of these two assessments, the JASS process is at the halfway mark. The last two site assessments will be carried out i] December at the two sites proposed by the European Union one at Cadar-ache in France and the other at Vandellos in Spain. It was agreed that the final report of the JASS would be presented at the Eighth Negotiations Meeting (N8), Significant progress was also made on a wide range of other issues, including matters such as the treaty to implement ITER (the Joint Implementation Agreement - JIA), procurement allocation and the intellectual property rights thait would accrue to participants in the project. The Negotiators agreed that the international organization responsible for implementing the project would be called the ITE-R International Fusion Energy Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years on from ZETA …
    Sixty years on from ZETA … Chris Warrick The Sun … What is powering it? Coal? Lifetime 3,000 years Gravitational Energy? Lifetime 30 million years – Herman Von Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin - mid 1800s The Sun … Suggested the Earth is at least 300 million years old – confirmed by geologists studying rock formations … The Sun … Albert Einstein (Theory of Special Relativity) and Becquerel / Curie’s work on radioactivity – suggested radioactive decay may be the answer … But the Sun comprises hydrogen … The Sun … Arthur Eddington proposed that fusion of hydrogen to make helium must be powering the Sun “If, indeed, the subatomic energy is being freely used to maintain their great furnaces, it seems to bring a little nearer to fulfilment our dream of controlling this latent power for the well-being of the human race – or for its suicide” Cambridge – 1930s Cockcroft Walton accelerator, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. But huge energy losses and low collisionality Ernest Rutherford : “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing . Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Oxford – 1940s Peter Thonemann – Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford. ‘Pinch’ experiment in glass, then copper tori. First real experiments in sustaining plasma and magnetically controlling them. Imperial College – 1940s George Thomson / Alan Ware – Imperial College London then Aldermaston. Also pinch experiments, but instabilities started to be observed – especially the rapidly growing kink instability. AERE Harwell Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE) Harwell – Hangar 7 picked up fusion research. Fusion is now classified. Kurchatov visit 1956 ZETA ZETA Zero Energy Thermonuclear Apparatus Pinch experiment – but with added toroidal field to help with instabilities and pulsed DC power supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert
    SE0100262 TRITA-A Report ISSN 1102-2051 VETENSKAP OCH ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE IONST KTH Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert Research and Training programme on CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS (Association EURATOM/NFR) FUSION PLASMA PHYSICS ALFV N LABORATORY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK TRITA-ALF-2001-04 ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert VETENSKAP OCH KONST Stockholm, June 2001 The Alfven Laboratory Division of Fusion Plasma Physics Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (Association EURATOM/NFR) Printed by Alfven Laboratory Fusion Plasma Physics Division Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION RESEARCH DURING HALF A CENTURY Bo Lehnert Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT A review is given on the historical development of research on plasma physics and controlled fusion. The potentialities are outlined for fusion of light atomic nuclei, with respect to the available energy resources and the environmental properties. Various approaches in the research on controlled fusion are further described, as well as the present state of investigation and future perspectives, being based on the use of a hot plasma in a fusion reactor. Special reference is given to the part of this work which has been conducted in Sweden, merely to identify its place within the general historical development. Considerable progress has been made in fusion research during the last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fusion Power – an Overview of History, Present and Future
    International Journal of Advanced Network, Monitoring and Controls Volume 04, No.04, 2019 Nuclear Fusion Power – An Overview of History, Present and Future Stewart C. Prager Department of Physics University of Wisconsin – Madison Madison, WI 53706, USA E-mail: [email protected] Summary—Fusion power offers the prospect of an allowing the nuclei to fuse together. Such conditions almost inexhaustible source of energy for future can occur when the temperature increases, causing the generations, but it also presents so far insurmountable ions to move faster and eventually reach speeds high engineering challenges. The fundamental challenge is to enough to bring the ions close enough together. The achieve a rate of heat emitted by a fusion plasma that nuclei can then fuse, causing a release of energy. exceeds the rate of energy injected into the plasma. The main hope is centered on tokamak reactors and II. FUSION TECHNOLOGY stellarators which confine deuterium-tritium plasma In the Sun, massive gravitational forces create the magnetically. right conditions for fusion, but on Earth they are much Keywords-Fusion Energy; Hydrogen Power; Nuclear Fusion harder to achieve. Fusion fuel – different isotopes of hydrogen – must be heated to extreme temperatures of I. INTRODUCTION the order of 50 million degrees Celsius, and must be Today, many countries take part in fusion research kept stable under intense pressure, hence dense enough to some extent, led by the European Union, the USA, and confined for long enough to allow the nuclei to Russia and Japan, with vigorous programs also fuse. The aim of the controlled fusion research underway in China, Brazil, Canada, and Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted %
    EXAMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES DOMESTIC FUSION PROGRAM ARCHW.$ By MASS ACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Lauren A. Merriman I OF IECHNOLOLGY MAY U6 2015 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING I LIBR ARIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2015 Lauren A. Merriman. All Rights Reserved. - The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly Paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author:_ Signature redacted %. Lauren A. Merriman Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering May 22, 2014 Signature redacted Certified by:. Dennis Whyte Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering I'l f 'A Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by: Richard K. Lester Professor and Head of the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering 1 EXAMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES DOMESTIC FUSION PROGRAM By Lauren A. Merriman Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering on May 22, 2014 In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering ABSTRACT Fusion has been "forty years away", that is, forty years to implementation, ever since the idea of harnessing energy from a fusion reactor was conceived in the 1950s. In reality, however, it has yet to become a viable energy source. Fusion's promise and failure are both investigated by reviewing the history of the United States domestic fusion program and comparing technological forecasting by fusion scientists, fusion program budget plans, and fusion program budget history.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Plasmas
    PSFC/JA-20-4 Nuclear diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) plasmas J. A. Frenje January 2020 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA The work described herein was supported in part by US DOE (Grant No. DE-FG03-03SF22691), LLE (subcontract Grant No. 412160-001G) and the Center for Advanced Nuclear Diagnostics (Grant No. DE-NA0003868). Reproduction, translation, publication, use and disposal, in whole or in part, by or for the United States government is permitted. Submitted to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Nuclear Diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Plasmas J.A. Frenje1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Email: [email protected] The field of nuclear diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) is broadly reviewed from its beginning in the seventies to present day. During this time, the sophistication of the ICF facilities and the suite of nuclear diagnostics have substantially evolved, generally a consequence of the efforts and experience gained on previous facilities. As the fusion yields have increased several orders of magnitude during these years, the quality of the nuclear-fusion-product measurements has improved significantly, facilitating an increased level of understanding about the physics governing the nuclear phase of an ICF implosion. The field of ICF has now entered an era where the fusion yields are high enough for nuclear measurements to provide spatial, temporal and spectral information, which have proven indispensable to understanding the performance of an ICF implosion. At the same time, the requirements on the nuclear diagnostics have also become more stringent.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion Research
    8080 YEARSYEARS OFOF FUSIONFUSION E.E.VelikhovVelikhov KurchatovKurchatov Institute,Institute, Moscow,Moscow, RussianRussian FederationFederation AAASAAAS 20082008 AnnualAnnual MeetingMeeting 1930s1930s TheThe BeginningBeginning 1928.G.Gamov -the theory 1930.Olifant,Kurchatov,Sinelnikov exp.- proton beam,Li target 1932.Bucharin proposals to Gamov. Gamov left USSR 20 years pausa Mid-1940sMid-1940s toto Mid-1950sMid-1950s 1946 J.Tompson,M.Blecman - DD, 9MWthermal, torus , 500 kA. 1944-46 Los Alamos E.Fermi, E. Teller, J.Tac, C.Ulam 1948 P.Tonemann exp.J=27 kA. 1951 X.Peron March 21 1951 L.Spitzer Stellarator B=2T, beta=50% april 1957 ZETA 1950s-Fusion1950s-Fusion inin thethe SovietSoviet UnionUnion 1950 O.Lavrentiev July 1950 A.Sacharov, E.Tamm Linear B=5T, beta=1 aug 1951 Stalin sign Order for MTR may 5 R=12m,a=2m,B=5T,n=1014,T=100kev,W=880 Mw. 1952 Neutrons from pinch! 1955 First tokamak - TMP 1952 OpeningOpening SovietSoviet FusionFusion toto thethe WestWest 1956 Harwell April 1956 Stockholm L.Artsimovich,I.Golovin 1957 Venice Ionized Phenomena in Gases 1958 Geneva Stellarator,but Bohm diffusion! 1960s-1960s- EmergenceEmergence ofof TokamaksTokamaks 1961 Ioffe bars 1965 Culham Artsimovitch: Our confinment 10 tims better! Spitzer: It is not principal. 1968 Novosibirsk T-3 Tel=1kev No Bohm! 1969 The 2nd Workshop on thoroidal systems in Dubna.D.Robinson reports on measurment of the Tel on Tokamak T-3. TRIUMPH OF TOKAMAKS. 1975 T-10 and PLT T10 T10 T7 Tuman T15 ____ ITER TheThe BirthBirth ofof ITERITER 1978 INTOR agreement 1985 Paris meeting may 1985 Geneva Sammit november 1988 ITER conceptual desing april 1990 CDA succesefuly concluded december 1992 EDA start,Canada @ Kasachstan join in association 1988 EDA end, but party decided cut prize by half.
    [Show full text]
  • (TFR-1) Thermonuclear Fusion Reactor: Theoretical Construction and Application
    (TFR-1) Thermonuclear Fusion Reactor: Theoretical Construction and Application Item Type Poster Authors Reyes-Mora, Joe Download date 05/10/2021 22:28:12 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1986 (TFR-1) Thermonuclear Fusion Reactor: Theoretical Construction and Application Reyes - Mora, J. Mentor: Dr. Chawdhury, A. • The other way in which nuclear fusion has been achieved on the earth is in the device commonly Because of the increased height of the Coulomb energy barrier with increasing atomic number, it is generally Introduction TFR-1: Application of Theory Possible Results known as the hydrogen bomb. At the high temperatures produced in a fission reaction, nuclei of true that, at a given temperature, reactions involving the nuclei of hydrogen isotopes take place more readily isotopes of hydrogen undergo fusion with the liberation of energy. In these circumstances, the The TFR-1 would integrate a new system and theory to produce thermonuclear reactions which are based on The possible outcome estimated with the consulted information projects a possibility of a future completion • A Brief History Of Fusion: than do analogous reactions with heavier nuclei. In view of the great abundance of the lightest isotope of nuclear reactions are propagated so rapidly that the energy is released in an uncontrolled (or hydrogen, with mass number 1, it is natural to see if nuclear fusion reactions involving this isotope could be thermonuclear fusion explosive devices, originally created for defense purposes. The increment of yield and and mass production of the project. There are many calculations yet to make, but the theory points in a positive explosive) manner.
    [Show full text]