DOCSLIB.ORG

John Foster Dulles : Pragmatist Or Moralist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Foster Dulles : Pragmatist Or Moralist University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1974 John Foster Dulles : pragmatist or moralist. Harry Park Tolles University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Tolles, Harry Park, "John Foster Dulles : pragmatist or moralist." (1974). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2507. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2507 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHN FOSTER DULLES: PRAGMATIST OR MORALIST A Thesis Presented By Harry Park Tolies Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 1974 (Month) (Year) Major Subject: POLITICAL SCIENCE JOHN FOSTER DULLES: PRAGMATIST OR MORALIST A Thesis By Harry Park Tolies Approved as to style and content by: Peter Fliess, Chairman of the Committee Constance Friesen, Member r i rjO Glen Gordon, Department Head Augu st 1974 TMonthT (Year) To my wife Robbyn Lynn iv CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi INTRODUCTION vii CHAPTER I. DEVELOPMENT OF THE VIEWS OF JOHN FOSTER DULLES Childhood, Formal Education, and Early Diplomatic Experiences 1 Law Career and Diplomacy 6 War, Peace and Change 14 World War Two, Bipartisanship, and Politics 19 War or Peace 23 Japanese Peace Treaty, 1952 Election 28 II. THE ADMISSION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TO THE UNITED NATIONS Early Experiences with China 32 The Communist Revolution 36 Initial Support for United Nations Membership 45 Reversal of Position 49 "Red" China Policy, 1953 and 1954 53 The "Pragmatic Formula". 56 III. THE "PEACEFUL LIBERATION" OF EASTERN EUROPE Evolution of the Concept..... 63 The Policy of Containment 68 1952 Presidential Campaign and the "liberation" 70 Promise ' 7Q East German Riots "Liberation" Policy in the First Four Years 87 V Hungarian Revolt and the "Redefinition" of Liberation 92 IV. CONCLUSION The Pragmatist Versus the Moralist 97 BIBLIOGRAPHY 102 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Words are not adequate to describe my appreciation for the help of Professor Fliess, my thesis advisor, whose many hours of work and innumerable suggestions were most valuable in the preparation of this thesis. I wish also to thank Professor Friesen whose cheerful words of encouragement bolstered my ofttimes sagging spirits. To my mother, Katherine Tolies, goes special appreciation for her seemingly tireless efforts in the arduous task of proof reading this manuscript. Finally, to my wife Robbyn Lynn, who over the past two years has been friend, advisor, critic, and my most ardent supporter, I give my deepest gratitude. vii INTRODUCTION Mr. Dulles' critics have labeled the former Secretary of State as a man obsessed with an overriding moralistic approach to American for- eign policy. This morality, it is argued, often surfaced as a right- eous indignation against what Secretary Dulles derogatorily referred to as "atheistic Communism." As a result, critics contend, Mr. Dulles was unable to deal pragmatically with real opportunities for detente with the Soviet Union and normalization of relations with the People's Republic of China. This thesis will deal with such criticism by first examining Mr. Dulles' views and how they developed from his childhood to the time he became Secretary of State. With this background information covered, the balance of the work will explore two specific aspects of Dulles' foreign policy: First, the question of "Red" Chinese membership in the United Nations; and second, the policy of "peaceful liberation." Dulles had two positions concerning the admission of "Red" China to the United Nations. Not long after the Communist revolution, he favored a policy of "Red" Chinese membership. However, when "Red" China became embroiled in the Korean War, he shifted his position to one of adamant opposition to "Red" Chinese membership. The second chapter will discuss this change of position and whether it was motivated by moral indignation or was a pragmatic decision by Dulles in order to will remain in the mainstream of public opinion. Further discussion center on Dulles' China policy and the reasons behind the failure to normalize relations with the People's Republic of China. viii The policy of "peaceful liberation" was Mr. Dulles' counterpropo- sal to the Truman policy of containment. In the third chapter, Dulles' "liberation" policy and its implementation will be studied. Further examination of this policy will raise the question of whether or not there was a potential for detente with the Soviet Union or whether it was Dulles' dogmatic determination to hold to his "liberation" policy which may have spoiled this chance. Finally, did the Hungarian revolt ultimately represent a failure of the Dulles "liberation" policy? The conclusion of this thesis will address the questions: Was Mr. Dulles predominately an overbearing moralist as his critics assert? Was he a pragmatist operating on a basis of political expedience? Or was he, perhaps, a combination of both of these aspects? CHAPTER I DEVELOPMENT OF THE VIEWS OF JOHN FOSTER DULLES Childhood, Formal Education, and Early Diplomatic Experiences The oldest son born to Reverend Allen Macy Dulles and Edith Foster Dulles on February 25, 1888, John Foster Dulles, was profoundly influ- enced during his childhood by both his father and grandfather. John Watson Foster, Dulles' grandfather, was a prominent American Statesman and former Secretary of State. Dulles' father was a Presbyterian min- ister, who for his time tended toward a "liberal" approach to religion. He emphasized that the Christian religion was not dependent upon belief in the "virgin birth." To his children, Reverend Dulles stressed the importance of religious education. As a result, the young Dulles was exposed to a comprehensive religious upbringing, including as many as three Sunday services, regular attendance in Sunday school, and Wednesday evening prayer meetings. Aside from the formal training there was a family requirement to memorize a passage from the Bible each week. This extensive religious training, Louis Gerson indicates, was not always pleasant; however, as Dulles grew older, "... he appreciated the early religious upbringing, seeing 'how relevant' it was 'in the far-flung and changing scenes of life.'"^ It was this demanding religious education which led to the first indications of Dulles' rather remarkable intellectual capabilities. Diplo- *Louis L. Gerson, The American Secretaries of State and their York: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc., macy XVII John Foster Dulles , (New 1967), p. 7. ^ 2 Townsend Hoopes cites remarks from the diary of Mrs. Dulles relevant to her son's intelligence: ... he has fine acquisitive powers, and such things as interest him he very promptly takes hold of and retains ... mentally, he is really remarkable for his intellectual acuteness. His logical acumen beto- kens a career as a thinker ... he reasons with a clearness far beyond his age. Dulles’ grandfather, John Watson Foster, exerted even more influence upon the young Dulles, an influence which would eventually lead Dulles to a diplomatic career culminating, in 1953, in his becoming the 69th Secre- tary of State. Deane and David Heller in their book note that though Dulles as a boy was devoted to his parents, he "idolized" his grandfather "... more than any other person..." it was grandfather Foster "... who guided 3 the youthful Foster Dulles in his choice of a career." Every summer Mrs. Dulles, accompanied by her children, visited grand- father Foster in Henderson Harbor located on Lake Ontario in upstate New York. There the young Dulles not only learned from his grandfather how to sail and fish, but listened to his stories of diplomatic adventures which were augmented by diplomatic goings on in Henderson Harbor. In his capacity as legal advisor to the Imperial Government of China in the nego- tiation of the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, Mr. Foster entertained sev- eral distinguished guests. This, notes Hoopes, could not help but widen and enrich the perspective of the Dulles children who viewed the (Boston: Atlantic ^Townsend Hoopes, The Devil and John Foster Dulles , Monthly Press Book, Little, Brown and Company, 1973), p. 11, citing Diary of Mrs. Allen Macy Dulles, February 25, 1893, Dulles Papers. 3 Soldier for Peace (New Deane and David Heller, John Foster Dulles: , York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960), p. 23. 6 3 steady ... stream of distinguished visitors to Henderson Harbor: Chinese gentlemen, European ambassadors, American politicians, jour- nalists, and other men of marked or moderate consequence who came briefly to rest and rusticate and talk. 4 John Foster Dulles received his primary education from the Water- town public school system, because his parents could not afford a pri- vate school. Nevertheless, Mr. Dulles was proud of this education em- phasizing that he, "... learned here solidly the fundamentals of read- ing, writing, and arithmetic, plus American history." He was partic- ularly impressed with the way American history was taught then in pub- lic schools, ... so as to emphasize the best in our great American tradition.... Historians today seem to take pride in trying to find defects in our great national figures, and to show hypocrisy in our national conduct. At the age of fifteen, Foster finished high school. Despite his intelligence, his parents felt he was too young to enter college. As a result, in the summer of 1903, Mrs. Dulles took Foster and his sister Eleanor to Europe. They spent most of their time in Lausanne, Switzer- land, where the children studied French. Afterwards, young Foster re- turned to Washington where he was tutored for a year in preparation for entrance into Princeton in the Fall of 1904. Foster was sixteen when he entered Princeton, a young age which certainly must have been a social if not a psychological handicap.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Covert Action to Prevent Realignment by Cullen Gifford Nutt
    Sooner Is Better: Covert Action to Prevent Realignment by Cullen Gifford Nutt September 2019 ABSTRACT Why do states intervene covertly in some places and not others? This is a pressing question for theorists and policymakers because covert action is widespread, costly, and consequential. I argue that states wield it—whether by supporting political parties, arming dissidents, sponsoring coups, or assassinating leaders—when they fear that a target is at risk of shifting its alignment toward the state that the intervener considers most threatening. Covert action is a rational response to the threat of realignment. Interveners correctly recognize a window of opportunity: Owing to its circumscribed nature, covert action is more likely to be effective before realignment than after. This means that acting sooner is better. I test this argument in case studies of covert action decision-making by the United States in Indonesia, Iraq, and Portugal. I then conduct a test of the theory’s power in a medium-N analysis of 97 cases of serious consideration of such action by the United States during the Cold War. Interveners, I suggest, do not employ covert action as a result of bias on the part of intelligence agencies. Nor do they use it to add to their power. Rather, states act covertly when they fear international realignment. 1 Chapter 1: Introduction 1. The Puzzle and Its Importance In April 1974, military officers in Portugal overthrew a right-wing dictatorship. A caretaker government under a conservative officer, Antonio Spínola, set elections for March of 1975. But Spínola resigned at the end of September, frustrated with menacing opposition from the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Allen Dulles - Wikipedia
    8/6/2020 Allen Dulles - Wikipedia Allen Dulles Allen Welsh Dulles (/ˈdʌləs/; April 7, 1893 – January 29, 1969) was an American diplomat and lawyer who became the Allen Dulles first civilian Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), and its longest-serving director to date. As head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) during the early Cold War, he oversaw the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état, the Lockheed U-2 aircraft program, the Project MKUltra mind control program and the Bay of Pigs Invasion. He was dismissed by John F. Kennedy over the latter fiasco. Dulles was one of the members of the Warren Commission investigating the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Between his stints of government service, Dulles was a corporate lawyer and partner at Sullivan & Cromwell. His older brother, John Foster Dulles, was the Secretary of State during the Eisenhower Administration and is the namesake of Dulles Airport.[1] Director of Central Intelligence In office Contents February 26, 1953 – November 29, 1961 Early life and family President Dwight Eisenhower John F. Kennedy Early career OSS posting to Bern, Switzerland in World War II Deputy Charles P. Cabell Preceded by Walter B. Smith CIA career Coup in Iran Succeeded by John McCone Coup in Guatemala Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Bay of Pigs In office Dismissal August 23, 1951 – February 26, 1953 Later life President Harry S. Truman Dwight Eisenhower Fictional portrayals Preceded by William H. Jackson Publications Articles Succeeded by Charles P. Cabell Book reviews Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Books for Plans Books edited In office Book contributions January 4, 1951 – August 23, 1951 President Harry S.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil Mcelroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961
    Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of MassiveSEPTEMBER Retaliation 2012 Evolution of the Secretary OF Defense IN THE ERA OF Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Special Study 3 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Cover Photos: Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, Thomas Gates, Jr. Source: Official DoD Photo Library, used with permission. Cover Design: OSD Graphics, Pentagon. Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Evolution of the Secretary OF Defense IN THE ERA OF Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Special Study 3 Series Editors Erin R. Mahan, Ph.D. Chief Historian, Office of the Secretary of Defense Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. President, Larsen Consulting Group Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense September 2012 ii iii Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Contents Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense, the Historical Office of the Office of Foreword..........................................vii the Secretary of Defense, Larsen Consulting Group, or any other agency of the Federal Government. Executive Summary...................................ix Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D
    Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Place: The Oval Office, the White House Time: May 1953 The President is in the early months of his first term and he recognizes Soviet military aggression and the How Should the subsequent spread of Communism as the greatest threat to the security of the nation. However, the current costs United States of fighting Communism are skyrocketing, presenting a Confront Soviet significant threat to the nation’s economic well-being. President Eisenhower is concerned that the costs are not Communist sustainable over the long term but he believes that the spread of Communism must be stopped. Expansionism? On May 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower has called a meeting in the Solarium of the White House with Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Treasury Secretary George M. Humphrey. The President believes that the best way to craft a national policy in a democracy is to bring people together to assess the options. In this meeting the President makes a proposal based on his personal decision-making process—one that is grounded in exhaustive fact gathering, an open airing of the full range of viewpoints, and his faith in the clarifying qualities of energetic debate. Why not, he suggests, bring together teams of “bright young fellows,” charged with the mission to fully vet all viable policy alternatives? He envisions a culminating presentation in which each team will vigorously advocate for a particular option before the National Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • John Foster Dulles and the Federal Council Of
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES AND THE FEDERAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, 1937-1949 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Albert N. Keim, B.A., M.A. ******* The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by Adviser Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Dr. Constant H. Jacquet, Jr., Director of the Research Library of the National Council of Churches, for giving me access to the National Council of Churches Archives. I am grateful for the assistance rendered by Mrs. Wanda M. Randall, Assistant to the Curator of Manuscripts, during my research in the Dulles Papers at Princeton University Library. Dr. Georgia Harkness, Dr. Roswell P. Barnes, and Dr. Samuel McCrea Cavert all provided valuable advice at various stages of the project. My adviser, Dr. Robert H. Bremner, gave unfailing counsel at every stage of the work, I owe a special debt to my wife, Leanna, who loyally supported the project from beginning to end. VITA October 31, 1935 Born - Uniontown, Ohio 1963 ........... B.A., Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisonburg, Virginia 1965 M.A., University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 1965-1969 Instructor, Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisonburg, Virginia 1969-1970 Teaching Associate, Department of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1970-1971 Dissertation Year Fellow, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Social History of the United States Since 1900. Professor Robert H. Bremner Political History of the United States Since 1900. Professor K. Austin Kerr Political and Social History of the United States, 1850-1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalism As a Current in the Peace Movement
    internationalism as a current in the peace movement: a symposium It is apparent from the literature on the peace movement and diplo­ matic thought throughout this century that an exploration of the some­ times contradictory use of the word internationalism is in order. Not only has it been used for different purposes by competing factions of the anti­ war movement and political leaders, but it has differing connotations for historians. This symposium is a contribution to a discussion of the term. Instead of asking for an abstract formulation, the editors invited several scholars to consider the roles of internationalist ideas in the peace move­ ment in the hope that a functional definition might emerge, one which might stimulate formal analyses and eventuate in a working understand­ ing. By way of opening the discussion, the editors asked Sondra Herman, the author of Eleven Against War: Studies in American Internationalist Thought, 1898-1921 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1969) to identify some conceptual problems that arise from her analysis. From the last decade of the nineteenth Sondra Herman century through the first world war of the University of California, twentieth, a small but prominent group of Santa Cruz American intellectuals and peace advocates argued for a distinctive approach to foreign relations which they called international­ ism. They represented a minority of the articulate public, probably a minority of the peace societies. They advanced ideas that were being heard also in Europe, and they debated the forms of international organi­ zation for years before President Woodrow Wilson took up their cause. When Wilson did use international ideals in his explanation of American mediation policy, and later of American war aims, he adjusted them considerably to the national interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, September 1980
    When you’re going overseas, you have enough to worry about without worrying about your insurance,too. Moving overseas can be a very traumatic time if you Moving overseas is simplified by the AFSA-sponsored don’t have the proper insurance. The fact is, the government insurance program for AFSA members. Our insurance will be responsible for only $15,000 worth of your belongings. program will take care of most of your worries. If any of your personal valuables such as cameras, jewelry, With our program, you can purchase as much property furs and fine arts are destroyed, damaged or stolen, you insurance as you feel you need at only 75tf per $100, and it would receive not the replacement cost of the goods, but only covers you for the replacement cost of household furniture a portion of what you’d have to pay to replace them. and personal effects that are destroyed, damaged or stolen, Claims processes are another headache you shouldn’t with no depreciation. You can also insure your valuable have to worry about. The government claims process is articles on an agreed amount basis, without any limitation. usually lengthy and requires investigation and AFSA coverage is worldwide, whether on business or documentation. pleasure. Should you have a problem, we provide simple, If you limit yourself to the protection provided under the fast, efficient claims service that begins with a simple phone Claims Act, you will not have worldwide comprehensive call or letter, and ends with payment in either U.S. dollars personal liability insurance, complete theft coverage or or local currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Brinksmanship: the Anglo-American
    TRANSATLANTIC BRINKSMANSHIP: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ALLIANCE AND CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY, 1953-1956 by DAVID M. WATRY Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2011 Copyright © by David M. Watry 2011 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have helped me in the preparation of this dissertation. I wish to personally thank and acknowledge Dr. Joyce S. Goldberg, who chaired the dissertation committee. Without her support, encouragement, and direction, this project would have been impossible. Dr. Goldberg fought for this dissertation in many ways and went far beyond the call of duty. I will be forever in her debt and forever grateful for her expertise, passion, patience, and understanding. I also wish to thank the other members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Kenneth R. Philp and Dr. Stanley H. Palmer. Their critiques, evaluations, and arguments made my dissertation a much more polished product than what it would have been without their significant help. Their wealth of knowledge and expertise made the writing of the dissertation a pleasurable experience. I would also like to thank the Dean of Liberal Arts, Dr. Beth Wright, the Associate Dean, Dr. Kim Van Noort, and Assistant Dean, Dr. Eric Bolsterli for providing me with the Dean’s Excellence Award for Graduate Research Travel. With this award, I was able to travel overseas to do research in London, Cambridge, Oxford, and Birmingham. Moreover, I wish to thank Dr. Robert B. Fairbanks, the former Chairman of the History Department at the University of Texas at Arlington.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938
    APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938 THE Munich Agreement, concluded between Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy for the cession of the Sudeten German territory by Czecho­ slovakia, although officially dated 29 September 1938, was in reality signed in the small hours of the morning of 30 September. l To it was annexed a declaration by the British and French Governments guaranteeing the new boundaries of the Czechoslovak state against unprovoked aggression. Germany and Italy also agreed to give a similar guarantee to Czechoslovakia 'when the question of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia had been settled'. It was further declared that the problems of these minorities in Czechoslovakia, if not settled within three months by agreement between the respective Governments, 'shall form the subject of another meeting of the Heads of the Governments of the four Powers here present'. Because of its nature, the Munich Agreement was not subject to the usual forms of ratification, and no provision for such procedure was included in its text. Parliamentary approval was accorded to Mr Chamberlain and to M. Daladier, on 6 and 5 October respectively, by means of votes of confidence but by the time these had been given in the House of Commons and the Chamber of Deputies the terms of the Munich Agreement were already a fait accompli. On 2 November 1938 the German and Italian Foreign Ministers, Ribben­ trop and Ciano, handed down the First Vienna Award, which, without consultation with, or reference to, the British and French Governments, adjudicated the fate of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia, in violation of the annexe to the Munich Agreement.2 The structure set up by the Munich Agreement was destroyed on 15 March 1939 when Hitler proclaimed that 'Czechoslovakia has ceased to exist'.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States, Great Britain, the First World
    FROM ASSOCIATES TO ANTAGONISTS: THE UNITED STATES, GREAT BRITAIN, THE FIRST WORLD WAR, AND THE ORIGINS OF WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919 Mark C. Gleason, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major-Professor Robert Citino, Committee Member Michael Leggiere, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Gleason, Mark C. From Associates to Antagonists: The United States, Great Britain, the First World War, and the Origins of WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 178 pp., bibliography, 144 titles. American military plans for a war with the British Empire, first discussed in 1919, have received varied treatment since their declassification. The most common theme among historians in their appraisals of WAR PLAN RED is that of an oddity. Lack of a detailed study of Anglo- American relations in the immediate post-First World War years makes a right understanding of the difficult relationship between the United States and Britain after the War problematic. As a result of divergent aims and policies, the United States and Great Britain did not find the diplomatic and social unity so many on both sides of the Atlantic aspired to during and immediately after the First World War. Instead, United States’ civil and military organizations came to see the British Empire as a fierce and potentially dangerous rival, worthy of suspicion, and planned accordingly. Less than a year after the end of the War, internal debates and notes discussed and circulated between the most influential members of the United States Government, coalesced around a premise that became the rationale for WAR PLAN RED.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The Personnel Series, consisting of approximately 17,900 pages, is comprised of three subseries, an alphabetically arranged Chiefs of Mission Subseries, an alphabetically arranged Special Liaison Staff Subseries and a Chronological Subseries. The entire series focuses on appointments and evaluations of ambassadors and other foreign service personnel and consideration of political appointees for various posts. The series is an important source of information on the staffing of foreign service posts with African- Americans, Jews, women, and individuals representing various political constituencies. Frank assessments of the performances of many chiefs of mission are found here, especially in the Chiefs of Mission Subseries and much of the series reflects input sought and obtained by Secretary Dulles from his staff concerning the political suitability of ambassadors currently serving as well as numerous potential appointees. While the emphasis is on personalities and politics, information on U.S. relations with various foreign countries can be found in this series. The Chiefs of Mission Subseries totals approximately 1,800 pages and contains candid assessments of U.S. ambassadors to certain countries, lists of chiefs of missions and indications of which ones were to be changed, biographical data, materials re controversial individuals such as John Paton Davies, Julius Holmes, Wolf Ladejinsky, Jesse Locker, William D. Pawley, and others, memoranda regarding Leonard Hall and political patronage, procedures for selecting career and political candidates for positions, discussions of “most urgent problems” for ambassadorships in certain countries, consideration of African-American appointees, comments on certain individuals’ connections to Truman Administration, and lists of personnel in Secretary of State’s office.
    [Show full text]