DOCSLIB.ORG

The United States, Great Britain, the First World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The United States, Great Britain, the First World FROM ASSOCIATES TO ANTAGONISTS: THE UNITED STATES, GREAT BRITAIN, THE FIRST WORLD WAR, AND THE ORIGINS OF WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919 Mark C. Gleason, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major-Professor Robert Citino, Committee Member Michael Leggiere, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Gleason, Mark C. From Associates to Antagonists: The United States, Great Britain, the First World War, and the Origins of WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 178 pp., bibliography, 144 titles. American military plans for a war with the British Empire, first discussed in 1919, have received varied treatment since their declassification. The most common theme among historians in their appraisals of WAR PLAN RED is that of an oddity. Lack of a detailed study of Anglo- American relations in the immediate post-First World War years makes a right understanding of the difficult relationship between the United States and Britain after the War problematic. As a result of divergent aims and policies, the United States and Great Britain did not find the diplomatic and social unity so many on both sides of the Atlantic aspired to during and immediately after the First World War. Instead, United States’ civil and military organizations came to see the British Empire as a fierce and potentially dangerous rival, worthy of suspicion, and planned accordingly. Less than a year after the end of the War, internal debates and notes discussed and circulated between the most influential members of the United States Government, coalesced around a premise that became the rationale for WAR PLAN RED. Ample evidence reveals that contrary to the common narrative of “Anglo-American” and “Atlanticist” historians of the past century, the First World War did not forge a new union of spirit between the English-speaking nations. The experiences of the War, instead, engendered American antipathy for the British Empire. Economic and military advisers feared that the British might use their naval power to check American expansion, as they believed it did during the then recent conflict. The first full year of peace witnessed the beginnings of what became WAR PLAN RED. The foundational elements of America’s war plan against the British Empire emerged in reaction to the events of the day. Planners saw Britain as a potentially hostile nation, which might regard the United States’ rise in strength as a threatening challenge to Britain’s historic economic and maritime supremacy. Copyright 2012 by Mark C. Gleason ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Great thanks is given to Drs. Geoffrey Wawro, Robert Citino, and Michael Leggiere, whom I have been privileged to work with over the past three years; the staff of the office of the North Texas Department of History; and fellow graduate students, who have aided in the development of this work. Additionally, much appreciation is expressed to the most friendly and helpful archivists at the Library of Congress’s Manuscript Division in Washington, D.C., at the Mudd Manuscript Library at Princeton University, and at Sterling Memorial Library at Yale University. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2. CONTROVERSIES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR ...........................................14 CHAPTER 3. RETURN TO RIVALRY BETWEEN WAR AND PEACE .................................48 CHAPTER 4. THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE ...................................................................83 CHAPTER 5. THE ASSOCIATION SOURS .............................................................................118 CHAPTER 6. RED INAUGURATED: THE FOUNDATIONS FOR ANGLO-AMERICAN WAR PLANS...................................................................................................................150 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................161 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................164 iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION WAR PLAN RED occupies a curious position in military historiography. American military plans for a war with the British Empire, first discussed in 1919, finally developed in 1927-1930, and retained up through 1939 – one of many colored plans the Army and Navy jointly developed in the post-First World War period – have received varied treatment since their declassification in 1974. The official plan assumed a long war, “involving the maximum effort of the armed forces and civil power of the United States, directed...toward...the defeat of [the British Empire’s] armed forces in North America and the Western North Atlantic, including the Caribbean Sea and West Indian waters, and finally toward the economic exhaustion of the...United Kingdom.” British forces would concentrate land and naval forces on Canada. Over the course of a year, the Joint Army and Navy Board estimated British and Canadian military forces in the Dominion could amount to 1.29 million men; the Royal Navy in Western Atlantic waters, operating out of Canadian and Caribbean ports, could possess 16 battleships, 5 aircraft-carriers, 143 destroyers, and 52 submarines; and the Royal Air Force could send up to 72 squadrons to North America. PLAN RED anticipated a British-Canadian invasion of the United States, primarily the northeast, at the earliest possible moment to arrest American mobilization. Against this possibility, an American expeditionary force of some 25,000 men would capture Halifax to prevent British reinforcement of Canada, followed by amphibious assaults on other harbors to prevent effective British naval operations in the Western Atlantic. Ultimately, the Joint Board estimated 4.6 million men could be mobilized into 9 armies and support organizations. Besides Canadian ports, 1 other offensive operations into Canada would be launched, as well as against strategic British locations such as Jamaica, Bermuda, and the Bahamas in the Caribbean. Additionally, the United States Navy would embark upon a campaign of guerre de course against Britain’s worldwide commerce, attempt a distant blockade of the home islands, and force the British Empire to terms.1 The most common theme among historians in their appraisals of PLAN RED is that of an oddity. One of the most valuable sources on the details of American war plans, Steven Ross of the Naval War College, dismisses RED as lacking “serious political rationale,” a contention he repeats in several iterations in two separate works on American war planning.2 In full agreement, an Army War College production, Henry Gole’s Road to Rainbow, implies that these plans “bore little relation to contemporary developments in international affairs.”3 Its only value, these scholars contend, existed in providing United States military planners “practice in dealing with problems of a major war,” for study of “the complexities of an Atlantic-centered conflict,” or merely “exercise [of] skills in defending the Atlantic coast.”4 One reviewer reduces it even further: it remained simply “to give colonels and captains something to do.”5 These and other authors maintain that PLAN RED provided little more than a phase on the “Road to Rainbow.” Even those willing to concede some element of the realistic in the plans remain focused more on the premise that, “for both the Army and Navy, planning for war against RED...provided valuable experience from which the services drew when they confronted really 1 Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan – RED, Estimates of the Situation, 16 May 1930, JB 325, Serial No. 436, Records of the Joint Army and Navy Boards and Committees, 1903-1947, Record Group 225, National Archives II, College Park, Maryland, M1421, Roll 10. 2 Steven T. Ross, American War Plans, 1890-1939 (London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2002), 145. 3 Henry G. Gole, Road to Rainbow: Army Planning for Global War, 1934-1940 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2002), x. 4 Steven T. Ross, American War Plans, 1919-1941, vol. 1, Peacetime War Plans, 1919-1935 (New York: Garland Publishing, 1992), ii; idem, American War Plans, 145; Gole, Road to Rainbow, xvii. 5 Thaddeus Holt, “Joint PLAN RED,” Military History Quarterly (1988): 48. 2 dangerous enemies...on the eve of World War II.”6 Indeed, one of Road to Rainbow’s main arguments asserts that, however illogical RED or the other colored plans were, they provided direction on the path to the eventual – presumably more logical – planning for coalition warfare entailed in the Rainbow Plans that emerged in the late 1930s. Near incredulity underlies these perceptions – that American Army and Navy planners would even devise plans for an Anglo-American war. Ross declares, “The idea that the United States and Britain would engage...against each other...was at best remote.”7 Gole counts RED as unrealistic because he considers Britain a most “unlikely foe” during the Inter-War period.8 In this premise, that a serious notion of such a war between 1919 and 1939 must have been “unthinkable,” and such planning therefore nonsensical, Ross and Gole have much company. The idea of a true friendship between the United States and the United Kingdom, emerging prior
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treaty of Versailles I
    Treaty of Versailles I. Wilson’s Vision forWorld Peace A. Fourteen Points to End All Wars 1. Wilson’s first goal was to eliminate the causes of wars by calling for an end to secret agreements and alliances, protecting freedom of the seas, and reducing armaments. 2. Wilson’s second goal was to ensure the right to self-determination so ethnic groups and nationalities could live under governments of their own choosing. 3. The last of the fourteen points called for setting up a League of Nations to ensure world peace. B. Wilson’s Unusual Decisions 1. Wilson broke with tradition by traveling out of the United States while president to lead the U.S. delegation to the peace conference in Paris. 2. Wilson weakened his position when he asked Americans to support Democrats in the 1918 midterm elections, but then the Republicans won a majority in Congress. 3. Wilson made matters worse by choosing all Democrats and only one Republican to serve as the other delegates to the peace conference. II. Ideals Versus Self-Interest at Versailles A. Peace Without Victory Gives Way to War Guilt and Reparations 1. Wilson’s vision for a peaceful world was different from the vision of other Big Four leaders. 2. France’s Georges Clemenceau was most concerned about French security. 3. David Lloyd George wanted Germany to accept full responsibility for the war through a warguilt clause and reparations. 4. Wilson tried to restrain from punishing Germany but ultimately agreed to gain support for the League of Nations. B. Self-Determination Survives, but Only in Europe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan the UNIVERSITY of OKLAHOMA
    This dissertation has been 65-12,998 microfilmed exactly as received MATHENY, David Leon, 1931- A COMPAEISON OF SELECTED FOREIGN POLICY SPEECHES OF SENATOR TOM CONNALLY. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1965 ^eech-Theater University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE A COMPARISON OP SELECTED FOREIGN POLICY SPEECHES OF SENATOR TOM CONNALLY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY DAVID LEON MATHENY Norman, Oklahoma 1965 A COMPARISON OP SELECTED FOREXON POLICY SPEECHES OP SENATOR TOM CONNALLY APPROVED BY L-'iJi'Ui (^ A -o ç.J^\AjLôLe- DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express thanks to Professor Wayne E. Brockriede and members of the University of Oklahoma Speech Faculty for guidance during the preparation of this dissertation. A special word of thanks should go to Profes­ sor George T. Tade and the Administration of Texas Christian University for encouragement during the latter stages of the study and to the three M's — Mary, Melissa and Melanie — for great understanding throughout the entire project. TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................... Ill Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ......................... 1 Purpose of the S t u d y ..................... 6 Previous Research......................... 8 Sources of Material....................... 9 Method of Organization ................... 10 II. CONNALLY, THE SPEAKER....................... 12 Connally's Non-Congresslonal Speaking Career.......... 12 General Attributes of Connally's Speaking............................... 17 Conclusion . ........................... 31 III. THE NEUTRALITY ACT DEBATE, 1939............. 32 Connally's Audience for the Neutrality Act Debate.............. 32 The Quest for Neutrality ............ 44 The Senate, Connally and Neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Republicans on the Run Editor's Column
    December 1984 Volume XX, No.6 Price $ 1.50 ~\- Republicans On The Run Editor's Column One of the first orders of business for RepUblicans on Capitol Hillfollowing the 1984 election was the selection of new Senate leaders. For moderates and progressives, the news was encouraging. Bob D ole was elected majon'ty leader. RIPON fORtJM John Heinz again heads the National Republican Senaton'al Commillee; John Chcifee is in charge ofth e Senate Republi­ can Conference; B ob Packwood is chairman of the Senate Editor's Column 2 Finance Commillee; a nd John Danforth is in charge of the Pronlu and Perspectivu: 3 Senate Commerce Commillee, They join other moderates A Conversation with andprogressives, such as Pete Domenici and M ark Haifield, Donald Shriver in key leadership positions. Our cover design points out that some moderates might, in A P~serlptlon (or Pro&resslves: 7 Dale Curt!, fact, seek the presidency in 1988. Ofcourse, it is too early, if not plain wrong, to start sen'ously hypothesizing about 1988. Editorial: LooklnaBeyond 1984 Yet it isn't too earlyfor GOP moderates and progressives to • begin organizing andfocusing on specific goals. This is the Toward A PrOltenive 12 Repubtlean Alenda: theme of several articles in this edilion oflhe Forum. Dale David L. S.lI acb CUrlis outlines several obstacles thaI must be overcome, but he also claims thatfivefavorable trends existfor moderates Proafuslve Republicans: IS and progressives, David Sallachpresenls theftrst in a sen'es Head Soutb and Go Wu t: William P. McKenzie ofprogressive R epublican "agendas, "focusing pn'man'ly on U.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • Svetozar Borevic, South Slav Habsburg Nationalism, and the First World War
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-17-2021 Fuer Kaiser und Heimat: Svetozar Borevic, South Slav Habsburg Nationalism, and the First World War Sean Krummerich University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Krummerich, Sean, "Fuer Kaiser und Heimat: Svetozar Borevic, South Slav Habsburg Nationalism, and the First World War" (2021). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8808 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Für Kaiser und Heimat: Svetozar Boroević, South Slav Habsburg Nationalism, and the First World War by Sean Krummerich A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Kees Boterbloem, Ph.D. Darcie Fontaine, Ph.D. J. Scott Perry, Ph.D. Golfo Alexopoulos, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 30, 2021 Keywords: Serb, Croat, nationality, identity, Austria-Hungary Copyright © 2021, Sean Krummerich DEDICATION For continually inspiring me to press onward, I dedicate this work to my boys, John Michael and Riley. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support of a score of individuals over more years than I would care to admit. First and foremost, my thanks go to Kees Boterbloem, Darcie Fontaine, Golfo Alexopoulos, and Scott Perry, whose invaluable feedback was crucial in shaping this work into what it is today.
    [Show full text]
  • In New York City
    Outdoors Outdoors THE FREE NEWSPAPER OF OUTDOOR ADVENTURE JULY / AUGUST / SEPTEMBER 2009 iinn NNewew YYorkork CCityity Includes CALENDAR OF URBAN PARK RANGER FREE PROGRAMS © 2009 Chinyera Johnson | Illustration 2 CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION www.nyc.gov/parks/rangers URBAN PARK RANGERS Message from: Don Riepe, Jamaica Bay Guardian To counteract this problem, the American Littoral Society in partnership with NYC Department of Parks & Recreation, National Park Service, NYC Department of Environmental Protection, NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Jamaica Bay EcoWatchers, NYC Audubon Society, NYC Sierra Club and many other groups are working on various projects designed to remove debris and help restore the bay. This spring, we’ve organized a restoration cleanup and marsh planting at Plum Beach, a section of Gateway National Recreation Area and a major spawning beach for the ancient horseshoe crab. In May and June during the high tides, the crabs come ashore to lay their eggs as they’ve done for millions of years. This provides a critical food source for the many species of shorebirds that are migrating through New York City. Small fi sh such as mummichogs and killifi sh join in the feast as well. JAMAICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECTS: Since 1986, the Littoral Society has been organizing annual PROTECTING OUR MARINE LIFE shoreline cleanups to document debris and create a greater public awareness of the issue. This September, we’ll conduct Home to many species of fi sh & wildlife, Jamaica Bay has been many cleanups around the bay as part of the annual International degraded over the past 100 years through dredging and fi lling, Coastal Cleanup.
    [Show full text]
  • << HOPE in CRISIS 2020 ALUMNI
    ALUMNI MAGAZINE • WINTER 2020 << HOPE IN CRISIS 2020 ALUMNI MEDALLION THE GREATEST SHOWMEN “ William & Mary has given me so much, I want to pass it down the line. It’s important for the future of the university.” — Betsy Calvo Anderson ’70, HON J.D. ’15, P ’00 YOUR LEGACY FOR ALL TIME COMING. “ Why do I give? I feel lucky to have a unique perspective on William & Mary. As a Muscarelle Museum of Art Foundation board member, an emeritus member of the William & Mary Law School Foundation board and a past president of the Alumni Association, I’ve seen first-hand the resources and commitment it takes to keep William & Mary on the leading edge of higher education — and how diligently the university puts our contributions to work. My late husband, Alvin ’70, J.D. ’72, would be happy to know that in addition to continuing our more than 40-year legacy of annual giving, I’ve included our alma mater in my estate plans. Although I never could have imagined when I arrived on campus at age 18 what an enormous impact William & Mary would have on my life, I also couldn’t have imagined the opportunity I would have to positively influence the lives of others.” WILLIAM & MARY For assistance with your charitable gift plans, contact OFFICE OF GIFT PLANNING Kirsten A. Kellogg ’91, Ph.D., Executive Director of Principal Gifts and Gift Planning, at (757) 221-1004 or [email protected]. giving.wm.edu/giftplanning BOLD MOMENTS DEFINE US. For Omiyẹmi, that moment was when she stopped waiting for approval to create art and started devising her own opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers Biographies
    7th Annual Sustainable Raritan Conference and Awards Ceremony Two States: One Bay A bi-state conversation about the future of the Raritan Bay Douglass Student Center Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 100 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Friday, June 12, 2015 Participant Biographies Carl Alderson is the Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Habitat Restoration Coordinator for the NOAA Fisheries Restoration Center, stationed at the Howard National Marine Science Lab in Highlands, NJ. Through his career Carl has provided management, restoration planning and technical design guidance to coastal habitat projects valued at over $50 million dollars through NOAA’s Damage Assessment Remedial and Restoration Program and Community- based Restoration Grants Program. Projects improve passage of migratory fish, and enhance shellfish and wetland habitats; often with the additional benefit of site remediation. As coordinator for NOAA efforts in Delaware, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey, Carl has developed relationships between federal, state and local partners that led to significant leveraging of project funds. Carl is a graduate of the Rutgers University, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences - Landscape Architecture Program. Before joining NOAA in 2002, Carl led a team of NYC scientists in a decade long effort to acquire, protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands, marine bird and fish habitat as compensation for natural resources damages resulting from oil spills in NY Harbor. Kate Anderson, Chief, Clean Water Regulatory Branch, USEPA. Kate Anderson is the branch manager for the Clean Water Regulatory Branch in the Environmental Protection Agency‘s Clean Water Division in EPA’s New York office. Her branch is responsible for a variety of CWA regulatory programs in New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, including, NPDES permitting, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), water quality standards, dredged materials management and the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Von Hötzendorf and the “Smoking Gun”: a Biographical Examination of Responsibility and Traditions of Violence Against Civilians in the Habsburg Army 55
    1914: Austria-Hungary, the Origins, and the First Year of World War I Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) Samuel R. Williamson, Jr. (Guest Editor) CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 23 uno press innsbruck university press Copyright © 2014 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, LA 138, 2000 Lakeshore Drive. New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Printed in the United States of America Design by Allison Reu Cover photo: “In enemy position on the Piave levy” (Italy), June 18, 1918 WK1/ALB079/23142, Photo Kriegsvermessung 5, K.u.k. Kriegspressequartier, Lichtbildstelle Vienna Cover photo used with permission from the Austrian National Library – Picture Archives and Graphics Department, Vienna Published in the United States by Published and distributed in Europe University of New Orleans Press by Innsbruck University Press ISBN: 9781608010264 ISBN: 9783902936356 uno press Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Ferdinand Karlhofer, Universität Innsbruck Assistant Editor Markus Habermann
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Yanks are Coming Over There: The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cc4h9md Author Buenviaje, Dino Ejercito Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Yanks are Coming Over There: The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje August 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Brian Lloyd, Chairperson Dr. Roger Ransom Dr. Thomas Cogswell Copyright by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje 2014 The Dissertation of Dino Ejercito Buenviaje is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is truly a humbling experience when I consider the people and institutions that have contributed to this work. First of all, I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Brian Lloyd, for his patience and mentorship in helping me to analyze the role of Anglo- Saxonism throughout American history and for making me keep sight of my purpose. I am also grateful to my other committee members such as Dr. Roger Ransom, for his support early in my graduate program, and Dr. Thomas Cogswell, for his support at a crucial point in my doctorate program. I also would like to thank Dr. Kenneth Barkin for his suggestion that I add a German-American chapter to my dissertation to make my study of American society during the First World War more well-rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historian by Geoffrey Wawro
    The Historian By Geoffrey Wawro ’78 I’ve always been a historian. I remember being curious about the origins of everything as a boy. I remember looking things up — going through encyclopedias and atlases, reading the whole shelf of Landmark biographies in grade school, spending my paper route pay on volumes (there were 156 of them) of Ballantine’s Illustrated History of World War II. Military history was a particular interest because my generation was marinated in war. Most fathers had been in the service and programming on TV was heavily military: Rat Patrol, Combat, Twelve O’Clock High, Hogan’s Heroes, Branded, you name it. Like the producers of those shows, we kids never paused to consider the horrors of war, only the fanfare. My first German class was at Loomis in 1974 with Frau Ursula Uhlig, but I’d been learning German for years in war movies and shows, snippets like: “’raus, Mach schnell, Schweinhund.” We used to play “army” all the time when I was a kid, and — because we always pitted Americans against Krauts — pride of place went to the guy who spoke or approximated the best German. By far the best Kraut in our entourage was a guy whom I lost touch with after grade school and then suddenly met again at Loomis Chaffee (years later): Chuck Daukas. He was as menacing a Landser as any 10-year-old could be. His guttural bits of German, growled from under a plastic Wehrmacht helmet, were pitch-perfect. In the diffident way of adolescents, when we eventually reconnected — at Bill Eaton’s early football tryouts at Loomis, a half dozen years after our last meeting (on a recon mission across the roof of Hughes Convalescent Home in West Hartford, literally running from maintenance personnel and leaping from roof to roof) — we acted as if we’d never met and had had no shared experiences in youth, even though we’d been brothers-in-arms for six years or more.
    [Show full text]