DOCSLIB.ORG

Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan Full Citation: Kendrick A Clements, “Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan,” Nebraska History 77 (1996): 167-176 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1996Bryan_SecState.pdf Date: 4/23/2013 Article Summary: Bryan’s foreign policy alternated between rash interventionism and timid isolationism. He proved to be too idealistic to serve successfully as secretary of state in a time of revolution and world war. Cataloging Information: Names: William Jennings Bryan, Woodrow Wilson, William McKinley, William Howard Taft, Edward M House, Roger Farnham Place Names: Philippines, Panama Canal, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, China, Japan Keywords: William Jennings Bryan, Woodrow Wilson, tariffs, income tax, Federal Reserve, Clayton Antitrust Act, Federal Trade Commission, Edward M House, treaties, German submarine warfare, League of Nations Photographs / Images: Bryan at his desk in the State Department, 1913; President Wilson and his cabinet, 1913; Bryan confirming ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment (direct election of US senators); paperweights that Bryan had had made out of old swords By Kendrick A. Clements William Jennings Bryan looked as little like a secretary of state as anyone who has ever occupied the office. His baggy, countrified clothes were always rumpled, his hair a long, untidy fringe around his bald dome. His pockets were stuffed with official dispatches, letters and memoranda scribbled on the backs of old envelopes, and with radishes, his favorite snack. He preached economy, but sometimes signed vouchers for large sums without being sure what he was authorizing and went unprepared to tes­ tify before congressional appropriations committees. American diplomats over­ seas complained that he often ignored their dispatches. Informal and gregari­ ous, the secretary preferred farmers to foreign dignitaries. Each summer he left Washington to deliver inspirational speeches before rural audiences who gathered by thousands to hear his roIl­ Bryan at his desk in the state department, 1913. NSHS-B915-49x ing baritone voice. To urban critics, his appearances on those Chautauqua order to have him "in Washington and might well have said the same thing. stages, along with magicians, comedi­ in harmony with the administration Moreover, Wilson's adherence to re­ ans and ventriloquists, were proof that rather than outside and possibly in a forms that Bryan had long championed he was unfit to be secretary of state . critical attitude."2 and Bryan's loyal support of the When he refused to serve wine at offi­ Bryan's influence on Wilson adminis­ president's domestic policy drew them cial functions, many people derided his tration policy resulted from his personal together. Had they not disagreed in 1915 "grape juice diplomacy."l relationship with the president. Al­ over the proper response to German That Woodrow Wilson chose such a though Wilson had earlier opposed submarine warfare, Bryan might well seemingly inappropriate person to be Bryan politically, and the two had have served eight years in the cabinet secretary of state was, of course, a result hardly met before 1912, their agreement rather than a little more than two. A few of time-honored tradition. Bryan was ap­ that Christian principles ought to guide days after Bryan's resignation , Wilson pointed because he was the most foreign policy gave them common told a friend that the secretary had al­ prominent figure in the Democratic ground upon which to stand while they ways been "singularly loyal."4 Party, and Wilson asked him to serve in discovered that they liked each other. Aside from two terms in Congress in "My father ... ," Bryan recalled, "saw no the 1890s, Bryan's period as secretary of Kendrick A. Clements is professor ofhistory at necessary conflict-and I have never state was the only public office ever th e University of South Carolina. He is the author of William Jennings Bryan, Missionary been able to see any- between the held by the man who exercised a domi­ Isolationist (J 982) and The Presidency of principles of our government and the nant influence over American politics in Woodrow Wilson (J 992) principles of Christian faith ."3 Wilson the early twentieth century. Born in Sa­ 167 Nebraska History - Fall/Winter 1996 lem, Illinois, on March 19, 1860, Bryan two silverite senators, may have contrib­ ready being laid for a great international was the son of strongly religious parents uted to the narrow margin by which exposition to be held in 1914 to cel­ who taught him that God expected the treaty was approved. Renominated ebrate the opening of the Panama Canal Christians to serve Him by serving their for the presidency in 1900, Bryan tried and a century of peace in Europe. To fellow men. After completing college to combine the old and new by oppos­ the Commoner the moment seemed op­ and law school in 1883, Bryan married ing both the gold standard and imperial­ portune to bring to fruition his dreams and moved to Lincoln, Nebraska, where ism. Americans, prosperous and self­ both of domestic reform and of interna­ he set out to put his convictions into confident, found his message negative tional peace. practice by entering politics. During two and outdated, and he was defeated by Bryan's first and probably greatest terms in the House, as a senatorial aspir­ McKinley more soundly than in 1896. value to the Wilson administration was ant in 1894, and in 1896 as a presiden­ In the long run, even imperialists like in the domestic sphere. A longtime ad­ tial candidate, he defended farmers' val­ Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wil­ vocate of tariff reduction, he called the ues and expressed their conviction that son came to believe that taking the Phil­ president's speech asking for a substan­ their troubles were the result of urban ippines had been a mistake, but that tiallowering of duties "a great state pa­ influences over the tariff and the mon­ conversion was several years in the fu­ per" and also applauded the inclusion etary system. When he proclaimed to ture. Meanwhile, Bryan's influence in in the bill of a progressive income tax the Democratic convention in 1896, the national party diminished between authorized under the Sixteenth Amend­ "You shall not press down upon the 1900 and 1904, until Democrats realized ment to the Constitution. In the House a brow of labor this crown of thorns, you that they could not win the White House large Democratic majority assured easy shall not crucify mankind upon a cross with a conservative. After the defeat of passage of the Underwood tariff bill, but of gold," it was no accident that he used Alton Parker in 1904, it was clear that in the Senate Bryan's personal influence religious imagery.s He was defending a the country was in a reform mood, and with southern Democrats helped to way of life as well as advocating politi­ in 1908 the Democrats turned to Bryan maintain party discipline and assure the cal policies. for the third time. Now plumper and administration's success.s Nominated for the presidency in balder than in 1896 or 1900, he chal­ He played an even more crucial role 1896 by both the Democrats and the lenged William Howard Taft enthusiasti­ in the drafting of the Federal Reserve Populists, Bryan campaigned vigorously cally, but never found an effective cam­ Act, insisting that the government, not but was narrowly defeated by William paign issue, and the Ohioan, endorsed private bankers, must exercise ultimate McKinley. Declaring that the election by the popular Theodore Roosevelt, control and responsibility over the had been only "the first battle," the Ne­ rolled over him. banking system and the currency. His braskan vowed to renew the fight four Bryan's three electoral defeats never announcement that he supported the years later6 Before he could do so, how­ made him bitter or self-doubting. Issues, administration's bill "in all details" ever, the United States recovered from he believed, were more important than helped to arouse public demands for depression and plunged happily into a personal victories, and by 1912, when passage of the legislation and contrib­ "splendid little war" with Spain in 1898. he relinquished party leadership to uted significantly to its passage in De­ Together, prosperity and war trans­ Woodrow Wilson, he knew both parties cember 1913 9 formed the nation beyond anything had adopted ideas he had been among In regard to the third great element of Bryan had imagined in 1896 and made the first to support, and the Democrats, New Freedom reform legislation, control his old issues irrelevant. Opposed to the with majorities in both houses of Con­ of big business, Bryan played a quiet but war, Bryan nevertheless volunteered gress, had become "the party of reform." important part, supporting the passage loyally and served as a colonel in
Recommended publications
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I

    The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I

    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
  • Quintin Paredes 1884–1973

    Quintin Paredes 1884–1973

    H former members 1900–1946 H Quintin Paredes 1884–1973 RESIDENT COMMISSIONER 1935–1938 NACIONALISTA FROM THE PHILIPPINES s the first Resident Commissioner to represent eventually moved to Manila and studied law under the the Philippines after it became a commonwealth direction of another of his brothers, Isidro. He worked during of the United States, Quintin Paredes worked the day, studied at night, and after passing the bar exam, toA revise the economic relationship between his native Paredes briefly took a job with the Filipino government in archipelago and the mainland. Paredes championed Manila before moving to the private sector.4 Paredes married Philippine independence, constantly reminding policymakers Victoria Peralta, and the couple had 10 children.5 of his home’s history as a valuable and vital trading partner. In 1908 Paredes joined the solicitor general’s office In testimony before congressional committees and in in Manila as a prosecuting attorney and rapidly rose to speeches on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, the solicitor general post in 1917. The very next year, Paredes countered common misconceptions about Filipinos Paredes accepted the job as attorney general, becoming and worked to place the islands on stable economic footing as the Philippines’ top lawyer. Within two years, he became they moved toward independence. secretary of justice in the cabinet of Governor General One of 10 children, Quintin Paredes was born in the Francis Burton Harrison, a former Member of the U.S. northwestern town of Bangued, in the Philippines’ Abra House of Representatives from New York. President Province, on September 9, 1884, to Juan Felix and Regina Woodrow Wilson nominated Paredes to serve as an Babila Paredes.
  • Congressional Record-House

    Congressional Record-House

    1903. .CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 531 MESSEN<1ER OF COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR. vention between the United States and the Republic of Cuba, Mr. McCOMAS submitted the following resolution; which was signed on the 11th day of December, in the year 1902. refen-ed to the Committee to Audit and Control the Contingent Mr. CULLOM. If there is any Senator desiring to speak on Expenses of the Senate: the bill to-day, it is in order now to do so. Resolved, That the Committee on Education and Labor be, and is hereby, The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair will be glad to authorized to employ a. messenger at an annual salary at the rate of $1,«0, to recognize any Senator for that purpose. be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate until otherwise provided for Mr. CULLOM. If no Senator desires to speak, I move that the by law. Senate adjourn. .ASSISTANT CLERK TO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS. The motion was agreed to; and (at 12 o'clock and 20 minutes Mr. HANSBROUGH submitted the following resolution; which p.m.) the Senate adjourned until Monday, December 7, 1903, at was refened to the Committee to Audit and Control the Contin­ 11 o'clock and 30 minutes a. m. gent Expenses of the Senate: Resol~Jed, That the salary of the assistant clerk to the Committee on Pub­ lic Lands, authorized by resolution of February 24, 1903, at $1,000 per annum, be, and it hereby is, increased to $1,800 per annum, to take effect January HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
  • The United States, Great Britain, the First World

    The United States, Great Britain, the First World

    FROM ASSOCIATES TO ANTAGONISTS: THE UNITED STATES, GREAT BRITAIN, THE FIRST WORLD WAR, AND THE ORIGINS OF WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919 Mark C. Gleason, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major-Professor Robert Citino, Committee Member Michael Leggiere, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Gleason, Mark C. From Associates to Antagonists: The United States, Great Britain, the First World War, and the Origins of WAR PLAN RED, 1914-1919. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 178 pp., bibliography, 144 titles. American military plans for a war with the British Empire, first discussed in 1919, have received varied treatment since their declassification. The most common theme among historians in their appraisals of WAR PLAN RED is that of an oddity. Lack of a detailed study of Anglo- American relations in the immediate post-First World War years makes a right understanding of the difficult relationship between the United States and Britain after the War problematic. As a result of divergent aims and policies, the United States and Great Britain did not find the diplomatic and social unity so many on both sides of the Atlantic aspired to during and immediately after the First World War. Instead, United States’ civil and military organizations came to see the British Empire as a fierce and potentially dangerous rival, worthy of suspicion, and planned accordingly. Less than a year after the end of the War, internal debates and notes discussed and circulated between the most influential members of the United States Government, coalesced around a premise that became the rationale for WAR PLAN RED.
  • The American Colonization of the Philippines and the Self- Examination, Self-Presentation and Re-Presentation of American Identity

    The American Colonization of the Philippines and the Self- Examination, Self-Presentation and Re-Presentation of American Identity

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects CUNY Graduate Center 2000 The American Colonization of the Philippines and the Self- examination, Self-presentation and Re-presentation of American Identity Jennifer Marie McMahon The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4273 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge.
  • Dos 230Th Anniversary Thos Jefferson First Secretary Of

    Dos 230Th Anniversary Thos Jefferson First Secretary Of

    Thomas Jefferson (1790–1793) ✪ Edmund Jennings Randolph (1794–1795) ✪ Timothy Pickering (1795–1800) ✪ John Marshall (1800– 1801) ✪ James Madison (1801–1809) ✪ Robert Smith (1809–1811) ✪ James Monroe (1811–1817) ✪ John Quincy Adams (1817–1825) ✪ Henry Clay (1825–1829) ✪ Martin Van Buren (1829–1831) ✪ Edward Livingston (1831–1833) ✪ Louis McLane (1833–1834) ✪ John Forsyth (1834– 1841) DanielUnited Webster (1841–1843) Abel ✪ ✪ Parker Upshur (1843–1844) ✪ John Caldwell Calhoun (1844–1845)States ✪ James Buchanan (1845– 1849) ✪ John Middleton Clayton (1849–1850) ✪ Daniel Webster (1850–1852) ✪ Edward Everett (1852–1853)Department ✪ William Learned Marcy (1853– 1857) ✪ Lewis Cass (1857–1860) ✪ Jeremiah Sullivan Black (1860–1861) ✪ William Henry Seward (1861–1869)of ✪ Elihu Benjamin Washburne (1869–1869) ✪ Hamilton Fish (1869–1877) ✪ William Maxwell Evarts (1877–1881) ✪ James Gillespie BlaineState (1881–1881) Frederick ✪ Theodore Frelinghuysen (1881–1885) ✪ Thomas Francis Bayard (1885–1889) ✪ James Gillespie Blaine (1889–1892)1789 ✪ John Watson2019 Foster (1892– 1893) ✪ Walter Quintin• Gresham (1893–1895) ✪ Richard Olney (1895–1897) ✪ John Sherman (1897–1898) William Rufus Day (1898–1898) T✪ H E V O I C E ✪ John Milton Hay (1898–1905) ✪ Elihu Root (1905–1909) Robert Bacon (1909–1909) OF ✪AMERICA TO ✪ Philander Chase Knox (1909–1913) ✪ William Jennings Bryan (1913–1915) Robert Lansing THE WORLD ✪ (1915–1920) ✪ Bainbridge Colby (1920–1921) ✪ Charles Evans Hughes (1921–1925) Frank FOR 230 YEARS ✪ Billings Kellogg (1925–1929) ✪ Henry Lewis Stimson (1929–1933) Cordell Hull (1933–1944) AND BEYOND ✪ ✪ Edward Reilly Stettinius (1944–1945) ✪ James Francis Byrnes (1945–1947) ✪ George Catlett Marshall (1947–1949) ✪ Dean Gooderham Acheson (1949–1953) ✪ John Foster Dulles (1953– 1959) ✪ Christian Archibald Herter (1959–1961) ✪ David Dean Rusk (1961–1969) ✪ William Pierce Rogers (1969–1973) ✪ Henry A.
  • CHAPTER 1 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS: Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933

    CHAPTER 1 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS: Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933

    CHAPTER 1 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS: Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933 CHAPTER 1 8 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933 World War I created a diplomatic security crisis for the United States. Under Secretary of State Joseph C. Grew afterwards would describe the era before the war as “diplomatic serenity – a fool’s paradise.” In retrospect, Grew’s observation indicates more the degree to which World War I altered how U.S. officials perceived diplomatic security than the actual state of pre-war security.1 During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Department had developed an effective set of security measures; however, those measures were developed during a long era of trans-Atlantic peace (there had been no major multi-national wars since Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo in 1814). Moreover, those measures were developed for a nation that was a regional power, not a world power exercising influence in multiple parts of the world. World War I fundamentally altered international politics, global economics, and diplomatic relations and thrust the United States onto the world stage as a key world power. Consequently, U.S. policymakers and diplomats developed a profound sense of insecurity regarding the content of U.S. Government information. The sharp contrast between the pre- and post-World War I eras led U.S. diplomats like Grew to cast the pre-war era in near-idyllic, carefree terms, when in fact the Department had developed several diplomatic security measures to counter acknowledged threats.
  • The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1970 The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ingram, Alton Earl, "The Root Mission to Russia, 1917." (1970). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1786. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1786 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-3418 } INGRAM, Alton Earl, 1934- THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA, 1917. [ [I' The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1970 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan !■ i I ■ 1 ■■ ■■ ■■ !■ ■■ !■■■■! ■' ....... THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA 1917 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Alton Earl Ingram B.A., Northeast Louisiana State College, 1958 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1961 May, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank his faculty advisor, professor Burl Noggle, for his assistance during the preparation of this dissertation and his wife, Mimi, who has given unlimited assistance, encouragement, and under standing throughout the entire course of his graduate program. TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................
  • American History 1020: Lecture Outline

    American History 1020: Lecture Outline

    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government 1992 American History 1020: Lecture Outline Steven Alan Samson Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Samson, Steven Alan, "American History 1020: Lecture Outline" (1992). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 310. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/310 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 AMERICAN HISTORY 1020: LECTURE OUTLINE Steven Alan Samson I. THE STUDY OF HISTORY A. THE NATURE OF HISTORY 1. Role of Ideas and Presuppositions 2. Dual Purpose of History a. Seeking Facts: Reliability and Selectivity b. Interpreting Meaning Reading 1: Philosophies of History: A Secular View B. INESCAPABLE CONCEPTS 1. Sovereignty: Ultimacy 2. Ends: Goal, Purposes 3. Means: Blueprints, Plan, Method 4. Truth: Standard, Epistemology, Infallibility 5. Consequences: Ethics, Accountability, Liability Reading 2: Inescapable Concepts C. TWO EARLY VIEWS OF HISTORY 1. Cyclical a. Revolution b. Sacred Calendar c. Golden Age d. Polytheism e. Eternal Recurrence: Friedrich Nietzsche f. Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee 2. Linear a. Teleology (telos = goal) b. History as a Story c. God's Self-Revelation d. Providence and Theophany (appearance of God) e. "The Greatest Story Ever Told" f.
  • H. Doc. 108-222

    H. Doc. 108-222

    OFFICERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT [ 1 ] EXPLANATORY NOTE A Cabinet officer is not appointed for a fixed term and does not necessarily go out of office with the President who made the appointment. While it is customary to tender one’s resignation at the time a change of administration takes place, officers remain formally at the head of their department until a successor is appointed. Subordinates acting temporarily as heads of departments are not con- sidered Cabinet officers, and in the earlier period of the Nation’s history not all Cabinet officers were heads of executive departments. The names of all those exercising the duties and bearing the respon- sibilities of the executive departments, together with the period of service, are incorporated in the lists that follow. The dates immediately following the names of executive officers are those upon which commis- sions were issued, unless otherwise specifically noted. Where periods of time are indicated by dates as, for instance, March 4, 1793, to March 3, 1797, both such dates are included as portions of the time period. On occasions when there was a vacancy in the Vice Presidency, the President pro tem- pore is listed as the presiding officer of the Senate. The Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution (effective Oct. 15, 1933) changed the terms of the President and Vice President to end at noon on the 20th day of January and the terms of Senators and Representatives to end at noon on the 3d day of January when the terms of their successors shall begin. [ 2 ] EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, 1789–2005 First Administration of GEORGE WASHINGTON APRIL 30, 1789, TO MARCH 3, 1793 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—GEORGE WASHINGTON, of Virginia.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 11961 Llouse Bul 5303

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 11961 Llouse Bul 5303

    1914._ CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 11961 llouse bUl 5303. to tux mail-order houses; to the Committee Troy, nll in the State of New York. protesting against national on Wnys and ~Jeans. prohibition: to the Committee on Rules. Also. petition of sundry citizens of Quincy, Ill., against By :Mr. TRACHEU: Petitions nnd resolutions of sundry citi­ nntionnl prohibition; to tbe Committee on Rnles. zens of Bourne~ the Methodist Episeopal Church of Hanson· By Mr. KALAXIAXAOLE: Petition of 630 citizens of Hono­ sundq' citizens of Scituate; the Baptist Young People's Unl~ lulu, Hawaii. nud 150 citizens of Oahu. Hawaii, favoring na­ of .Mtddleboro; the First Portuguese Alethodist Episcopal tional prohibition; to the Committee on Rules. Chureh of New Bedford; the Methodist Chureh o-f Chilmark; By ~r. KEISTER: Petition of sundry ritizens of Jeannette, tile New England Yearly :lleeting of Friends; sundry citizens ot Pa.. fa,·oring the passage of the Hobson-Sheppard resolutions. Vineyard Hnven. Wareham, and Xew Bedford; the Bnrnstable l\-·hirb pro,·ide for a prohibition :tmendment to the Federal Con­ Woman's Christian Temperance Union; the Falmouth Woman's stitution; to the Committee on Rules. Christian 'l'emperance Union; the Penttlcostnl Church of the Also. petition of J. William Wellen. of Latrobe, Pa., protesting Nazarene, of Wareham; the Plymouth County Womnn's Chris­ against national prohibition; to the ·committee on Rules. tian Temperance Univn; the Qunrterly Conference of the Metho­ Also. petition of the Baptist Young People's Union of New dist E-piscopal Church of Acushnet; the Quarterly Conference Kensington, Pa., favoring national pro-hibition; to tbe Com­ of tbe Methodist Episcopal Church of Umg Plain; the Senior mittee on Rules.
  • Finding a Job

    Finding a Job

    Processed by: VJA DULLES Date: 04/05/06 DULLES, ELEANOR LANSING OH-70 977 pp./w Index PRCQ (M) Diplomat and economist; State Department official. DESCRIPTION: INTERVIEW #1: Early family life; education; memories of life in Washington, D.C.; grandfather, John Foster (Secretary of State, 1892-1893); uncle, Robert Foster (Secretary of State); mother, Edith Foster; father, Allen M.; her pastor; her brothers, John Foster and Allen; her sisters Margaret (later Mrs. Deane Edwards) and Natalie (later Mrs. James S. Seymour); family life; sermons preached by her father; Sunday school and church services; life in Auburn, New York; Auburn Academic High School. INTERVIEW #2: High school; college education at Bryn Mawr; M. Carey Thomas, president of Bryn Mawr; helping war refugees in Paris in 1917; working with 2 different agencies; John Foster and Allen Dulles travel to Paris with Robert Lansing who worked on peace negotiations; Lansing’s problems with Woodrow Wilson; life in Paris. INTERVIEW #3: Robert Lansing’s resignation; Wilson and his second wife; Eleanor Dulles’ return to Bryn Mawr for graduate fellowship in industrial training; internship in factories; labor unionism in the 1920s; Norman Thomas; Allen’s engagement and marriage; working as payroll and employment clerk in a factory; teaching at Bryn Mawr; Hilda W. Smith and labor education. INTERVIEW #4: Going to the London School of Economics in 1921; British labor in the 1920’s; study of wages in British industry; trip to Germany and Austria in summer of 1922; doctoral work at Radcliffe; Harvard professors; teaching at Simmons College; studying French in France in 1924-1925; economic and money theories.