DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 May Engagement Boards-Stage 1 V2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Green Line serves the mobility needs of Calgarians Green Line improves Green Line connects Green Line enhances mobility choices people and places quality of life In its entirety, the Green Line Construction of the Green Line Along with the new MAX bus rapid will deliver high-quality is our next step towards transit lines, Calgarians will have transit service to Calgarians completing Calgary’s transit fast, frequent and reliable transit in north-central and network, as described in service that strategically connects southeast communities. RouteAhead: A Strategic Plan communities, employment hubs, for Transit in Calgary. and key destinations across the city. Future Rapid Transit Network G 160 Av N 144 Av NW 144 Av N B Stonegate Sage Hill 128 Av NE North Pointe R Sherwood Country Hills Bv Tuscany 96 Av N Aurora Aero 36 St NE 88 Av NE Crowfoot Airport Terminal MO Edgemont Beddington Saddletowne Saddletowne Ci Martindale Martindale Bv Dalhousie 64 Av N Northland McKnight-Westwinds Falshire Dr Bow River Thornclie Castleridge Bv MO 44 Av NE Brentwood Whitehorn Bowfort Rd Whitehorn Dr 31 St NW 40 Av N University Canada Olympic Park 77 St NW 32 Av NE 70 St NW Rundleside Dr Alberta 63 St NW 28 Av N 26 Av NE Children’s Rundle Hospital Ban Trail Rundlehorn Dr 4 St NW Edmonton TrRusset Rd 19 St NE North Hill SAIT 16 Av N Lions Park Bowwood Dr Foothills Medical Centre 9 Ave N Marlborough Marbank Dr Bow River Home Rd Sunnyside 29 St NWCrowchild Tr19 St NW 14 St NW 2 Ave SW Bridgeland/ Barlow/ Memorial Zoo Franklin 46 St NW Max Bell Green Line Project Vision Point Dr Memorial Dr Shaganappi 6 St SE Point 12 St SE MT 4 St SE 8 Av SE Sunalta Downtown Westbrook West/Kerby 19 St SE 28 St SE 33 St SE 36 St SE44 St SE 61 St SE 70 St SE East Hills Centre St S B 17 Av SW Ramsay/ MP Victoria Park/Stampede Inglewood Sirocco 69 St SW 45 St 26SW Av SW 26 Av SW 26 Av SE Erlton/Stampede 17 Av/52 St SE Erin Woods N Richmond Rd 33 Av SW Higheld Erin Woods S Sarcee Rd Currie 39 Av S Mount Royal University MRU West 50 Av SE Elbow River Elbow Lynnwood/Millican 54 Av SW 61 Av SE Chinook Ogden 72 Av SE Rockyview Hospital Elbow River Deerfoot Glenmore Reservoir Elbow Dr Fairmount Dr Heritage Meadows 86 Av SE Heritage Park South Hill 94 Av SE CTrain 90 Av SW Oakridge Southland Riverglen Dr Quarry Park Southland 106 Av SE R Red Line Leisure Centre Tuscany – 210 Av S Braeside Dr Quarry Park Bv Douglas Glen Anderson 114 Av SE MT B Blue Line Woodview Dr Stonegate – 69 St. S.W. Douglas Glen Bv Shepard Canyon Meadows G Green Line Woodpark Bv 160 Av N – Seton MY Fish Creek-Lacombe Prestwick MAX James McKevitt Rd MAX Purple Shawbrooke Dr McKenzie Towne MP Bridleridge Wy Shawinigan Dr Shawnessy East Hills – City Centre 61 St SW 53 St SW45 St SW37 St SW 24 St SW MAX Orange MO River Bow Auburn Bay/Mahogany Brentwood – Saddletowne Somerset-Bridlewood MT MAX Teal Westbrook – Douglas Glen Silverado South Hospital MY MAX Yellow Woodpark Bv – City Centre Future Rapid Transit Projects 210 Av S Seton N Airport Link, Shaganappi Tr, 52 St E, 162 Av S, Bowness Rd R G 19-0001409 N 160 AVENUE N 144 AVENUE N NORTH POINTE Evaluating options for a updated Stage 1 96 AVENUE N BEDDINGTON The Green Line team undertook a planning process to evaluate and identify 64 AVENUE N an updated Stage 1 alignment that can be built within our budget of $4.9 billion, minimizes project risks, and helps achieve the project vision. McKNIGHT BOULEVARD 40 AVENUE N To do this, the team reviewed the whole Council Approved Stage 1 alignment from 28 AVENUE N 16 Avenue N to Shepard to nd cost reductions. 16 AVENUE N 2 AVENUE SW Stage 1 Evaluation 7 AVENUE SW 4 STREET SE INGLINGLEWOOD/RAMSAYEWOOD/RAMSAY CENTRE STREET S Goal: Review Stage 1 from 16 Avenue N to Shepard focused on reducing risk, controlling 26 AVENUE SE cost and improving customer experience while respecting the community the project is HIGHFIELD moving through. LYNNWOOLYNNWOOD/MILLICAND/MILLICAN STAGE 1 STAGE OGDEN Options evaluated for Stage 1 include the following in the Centre City: SOUTH HILL • Shortening the length of the tunnel QQUARRYUARRY PPARKARK • Reducing the number of underground stations DOUGDOUGLASLAS GLEN • Surface running trains on Centre Street N, and along 10, 11 and 12 Avenue S • Shifting the underground alignment from 2 Street S.W. to 1 Street S.W. SHESHEPARDPARD • Elevated track through the Centre City PRESTWICK • Bridge over Bow River McKENZIE TOWNE • Value Engineering south of 4 Street S.E. Outside of the Centre City, the complete Stage 1 alignment was evaluated from a value AUBURN BAY/ MAHOGANY engineering perspective to reduce cost and deliver greater value. HOSPITAL SETON Six evaluation criteria Cost and value Connecting Risk and Improves Urban and regional Environmental people to places constructability mobility development Updated Stage 1 Option Updated Stage 1 alignmentN 160 AVENUE N This alignment can be constructed 144 AVENUE N within budget, reduces construction risks, and delivers best value to Calgarians while achieving the NORTH POINTE Green Line Vision. 96 AVENUE N The updated Stage 1 alignment includes the following changes BEDDINGTON compared to the 2017 approved alignment: 64 AVENUE N McKNIGHT BOULEVARD • North Central BRT with 2 Segment MAX level service upgrades 40 AVENUE N • Surface-running LRT on 28 AVENUE N Centre Street N 16 AVENUE N 16 AVENUE N 9 AVENUE N 9 AVENUE NN • Bridge over the Bow River 2 AVENUE S 2 AVENUE SW 6 AVENUE S • 2.4 km of tunnel and three 7 AVENUE SW 4 STREET SE underground stations in the CENTRE STREET S RRAMSAY/INGLEWOODAMSAY/INGLEWOOD Centre City 26 AVENUE SE • Shallower tunnel in Beltline on HIGHFIELD 11 Avenue S From Elbow River to Shepard, there LYNNWOOD/MILLICAN are no alignment changes from the OGDEN 2017 Council approved alignment. SOUTH HILL Segment 1 Segment QQUARRYUARRY PARKPARK DOUGDOUGLASLAS GLEN Maintenance and Storage Facility SHEPARD SHEPARD.
Recommended publications
  • Intergovernmental Affairs Committee Agenda Package

    Intergovernmental Affairs Committee Agenda Package

    AGENDA INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE December 10, 2020, 9:30 AM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER Members Mayor N. Nenshi, Chair Councillor G-C. Carra, Vice-Chair Councillor G. Chahal Councillor P. Demong Councillor J. Farkas Councillor J. Gondek Councillor E. Woolley SPECIAL NOTES: Public are encouraged to follow Council and Committee meetings using the live stream Calgary.ca/WatchLive Members may be participating remotely. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. OPENING REMARKS 3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.1. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Intergovernmental Affairs Committee, 2020 November 12 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. DEFERRALS AND PROCEDURAL REQUESTS 5.1.1. Deferral of Bearspaw Tri-Lateral Task Force in response to IGA2019-0809 to the Intergovernmental Affairs Committee no later than 2021 April 15, IGA2020-1418 5.2. BRIEFINGS 5.2.1. Federation of Canadian Municipalities Update – December 2020, IGA2020-1398 5.2.2. Calgary Metropolitan Region Board – November 2020 Board Meeting Update, IGA2020-1359 5.2.3. Calgary Metropolitan Region Board - November 2020 Governance Committee Meeting Update, IGA2020-1393 6. POSTPONED REPORTS (including related/supplemental reports) None 7. ITEMS FROM OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATION AND COMMITTEES 7.1. Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA) Update – December 2020 (Verbal), IGA2020-1407 7.2. Municipal Measurement Index Update (Verbal), IGA2020-1416 7.3. Chestermere-Calgary Transit Project, IGA2020-1354 8. ITEMS DIRECTLY TO COMMITTEE 8.1. REFERRED REPORTS None 8.2. NOTICE(S) OF MOTION None 9. URGENT BUSINESS 10. CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS 10.1. ITEMS FROM OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATION AND COMMITTEES None 10.2. URGENT BUSINESS 11. ADJOURNMENT Item # 4.1 MINUTES INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE November 12, 2020, 9:30 AM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER PRESENT: Mayor N.
  • Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line Is Important to the Future of Calgary and Benefits All Calgarians

    Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line Is Important to the Future of Calgary and Benefits All Calgarians

    Page 1 of 19 Item # 7.1 Green Line Report to ISC: UNRESTRICTED Green Line Committee GC2020-0583 2020 June 01 Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line is important to the future of Calgary and benefits all Calgarians. It represents a significant investment in our transportation network, in our communities, and the future of our city. In its entirety, Green Line will deliver high-quality transit service to Calgarians in north central and southeast communities, and strategically connect communities, employment hubs, and key destinations for Calgarians who live and work across the city. Green Line will not only provide more mobility choice for Calgarians and enhance future community building, moving forward with Green Line today will ready Calgary for tomorrow’s recovery. Green Line Stage 1 will be an important part of Calgary’s economic recovery. The Stage 1 investment will create an estimated 20,000 jobs and comes at a critical time when it is important to bolster Calgary’s economy. Green Line is also a long-term investment in the growth and development of our city, it will be part of Calgary’s global competitive advantage and will help attract new businesses and a young, talented workforce to our city. In July 2019, Administration advised Council of the need to re-evaluate the scope of Stage 1 to bring the Program’s cost estimates within budget, manage construction risk and improve the customer experience to best achieve the Green Line vision. Council directed Administration to undertake a review of the Stage 1 alignment and to complete a series of due diligence activities to confirm that Stage 1 has the right alignment, that Stage 1 is the right project for Calgary and that it will be delivered using the right approach.
  • No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker

    No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker

    2021 No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker Top100 Projects 2021 Changing the Language of Top100 Projects — 2021 An annual report inserted in Infrastructure ReNew Canada’s had an interesting encounter following the release of last January/February 2021 issue year’s report, and I wanted to share in an effort to get I feedback from the rest of the industry. MANAGING Andrew Macklin We had released the 2020 Top100 Projects report and were EDITOR [email protected] getting set for the Key Players and Owners Dinner, which we host every February in Toronto as a celebration of the accomplishments GROUP Todd Latham PUBLISHER of the industry in developing infrastructure megaprojects. I had heard through one of my colleagues that a couple of well-respected PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski members of the industry wanted to chat with me at the event and I should seek them out. So I did. ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIOR DESIGN My first thought was that, not having nearly the expertise as many of you, that I had somehow managed to royally screw something ASSOCIATE Simran Chattha up. Or perhaps they wanted to tell me that I should try a different EDITOR tact to the report? Maybe a new idea for adding a complementary DIGITAL MARKETING Becky Umweni piece for this report? But as it turned out, they wanted to have a COORDINATOR conversation with me about… language. DIGITAL The language of this report has become, to some, quite convoluted. Connie Vitello EDITOR As different jurisdictions use the language familiar to them, it can often mean that, from one project to the next, different words are EVENT Natasha Mawji MANAGER used to describe the same thing.
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays

    Service Alerts – Digital Displays

    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
  • Climate Resilience Strategy and Action Plans Annual Report 2020

    Climate Resilience Strategy and Action Plans Annual Report 2020

    Climate Resilience Strategy and Action Plans Annual Report 2020 Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 4 The context of climate change 5 The Climate Resilience Strategy progress check 9 Progress summary: Climate governance and outreach 10 Progress summary: Climate change mitigation 11 Progress summary: Climate change adaptation 16 The road ahead 19 Appendix 1 – Climate governance and outreach 20 Appendix 2 – Climate Mitigation Action Plan 26 Appendix 3 – Climate Adaptation Action Plan 42 Executive summary The Climate Resilience Strategy guides The decrease of 14 per cent compared to 2019 – City of Calgary’s approach to climate change which is an unprecedented change The mitigation and adaptation The action plans that decrease in emissions happened for several support the delivery of the Climate Resilience reasons, including COVID-19 restrictions Strategy include efforts to establish climate impacting energy use across all sectors, the change governance; integrate and align climate provincial electricity supply becoming cleaner, change considerations and practices into City and warmer-than-usual weather reducing the services and processes; implement outreach and demand for heating Despite the significant education programs; reduce community and reduction in the last year, Calgary’s 2020 emissions City GHG emissions (climate mitigation); and were still only 0 4 per cent below 2005 levels, reduce climate-related risk to the community thus we are not yet on track to meet our target and in The City’s infrastructure and operations The Adaptation
  • Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project

    Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project

    Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project Phase One: ENVISION Engagement & Communications Summary Stakeholder Report Back – SPRING 2020 Table of Contents Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project .................................................. 1 Project overview .................................................................................................................. 1 Communications and engagement program overview ........................................................ 2 Phase One: ENVISION overview .......................................................................................... 3 What did we do and who did we talk to? ............................................................................. 4 About the Westbrook Communities Working Group ........................................................... 6 What did we ask through engagement? .............................................................................. 8 What did we hear throughout engagement? ....................................................................... 9 Summary of input received ................................................................................................ 10 What did we do with the input received? ........................................................................... 16 Project next steps .............................................................................................................. 17 Appendix: Participant demographic information .............................................................
  • Registrar's Periodical, September 15, 2008

    Registrar's Periodical, September 15, 2008

    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical REGISTRAR’S PERIODICAL, SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 0666193 CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Foreign 1412005 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Corporation Registered 2008 AUG 11 Registered Corporation Continued In 2008 AUG 05 Registered Address: 600, 12220 STONY PLAIN ROAD, Address: 1400, 707 - 7TH AVENUE S.W., CALGARY EDMONTON ALBERTA, T5N 3Y4. No: 2114189174. ALBERTA, T2P 3H6. No: 2014120055. 0707041 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1412730 ALBERTA INCORPORATED Numbered Registered 2008 AUG 14 Registered Address: SUITE Alberta Corporation Incorporated 2008 AUG 10 1608, 10025 - 102A AVENUE, EDMONTON Registered Address: 201 - 11919 102 STREET, ALBERTA, T5J 2Z2. No: 2114197185. EDMONTON ALBERTA, T5G 2G5. No: 2014127308. 101063838 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 1412734 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2008 AUG 14 Corporation Incorporated 2008 AUG 10 Registered Registered Address: #203, 5101 - 48 STREET, Address: 233 SIGNAL HILL CRT SW, CALGARY LLOYDMINSTER ALBERTA, T9V 0H9. No: ALBERTA, T3H 2G8. No: 2014127340. 2114196450. 1412754 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta 101126718 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Corporation Incorporated 2008 AUG 10 Registered Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2008 AUG 05 Address: 2086 TANNER WYND N.W., EDMONTON Registered Address: BOX 1010, 5012 49 ST, ALBERTA, T6R 2S4. No: 2014127548. LLOYDMINSTER ALBERTA, S9V 1E9. No: 2114179191. 1414321 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Corporation Incorporated 2008 AUG 11 Registered 123MC ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. Named Alberta Address: 132 6919 ELBOW DRIVE SW, CALGARY Corporation Incorporated 2008 AUG 12 Registered ALBERTA, T2V 0E6.
  • Bringing Citadel and Hawkwood Residents

    Bringing Citadel and Hawkwood Residents

    MARCH 2021 DELIVERED MONTHLY TO 7,250 HOUSEHOLDS your BRINGING CITADEL AND HAWKWOOD RESIDENTS TOGETHER Your WELLNESS COMMUNITY 10th Ave Market & Cafe Crowfoot Market Chinook Market Home Delivery & Curbside Pick Up $10 OFF your next purchase of $100 or more in store or online. Online use promo: SPRINGWELLNESS Valid March 1st - April 30th, 2021 communitynaturalfoods.com We want to hear from you Have you immigrated to Canada in the last five years? If yes, we would like to know who or what helped you as you settled into life in Calgary. The survey will take 10-15 minutes to complete and is available in 12 languages. Completed survey responses will In partnership with: beFunded placed by / Financé in a par: draw for one of ten $50 gift cards. In partnership with: Funded by/Financé par: Other funding Other funding organization logo organization logo Immigration, Refugees Immigration, Réfugiés and Citizenship Canada et Citoyenneté Canada 21-0012034 Struggling with Connect with a new, FREE set of resources, information, and legal advice designed to navigate this stressful scenario and empower you towards independence and economic recovery. Visit www.helpwithdebtalberta.com Welcoming New Patients • Dental Hygiene • Crowns, Bridges and White Fillings • Children’s Dentistry • Bioclear Method 403.286.2525 • Implants www.lunadental.ca • Invisalign • Root Canals and Extractions � � @lunadentalnw • Snore Guards and Mouth Guards Dr. C. Parekh, DMD We are open early mornings and Northland Professional Building evenings for your convenience. #304 4600
  • Max Purple Bus Rapid Transit (Brt)

    Max Purple Bus Rapid Transit (Brt)

    2020 CANADIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING AWARDS MAX PURPLE BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) Category G: Project Management “It’s about helping people get to where they need to go more quickly and that is ultimately an investment in people’s quality of life” —Naheed Nenshi, Mayor of Calgary Aerial view looking east along the MAX Purple Transit corridor – showing International Avenue in the distance 1 | STANTEC MAX Purple BRT bypassing traffic congestion on the new dedicated transitway INTRODUCTION For decades, the International Avenue community in The consulting team, led by Stantec, was brought on Calgary, Alberta relied on a lack of consistent, reliable, board by The City in October 2015 to complete Phase 1 high-quality public transit as their most common means of the project. Our team worked collaboratively with The of transportation. To revitalize the transportation City to update the conceptual road design, undertake infrastructure in this area, The City of Calgary (The traffic analysis, engage closely with public stakeholders, City) engaged Stantec to design and administer the complete utility, geotechnical and environmental construction of the MAX Purple Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). assessment requirements, deliver a detailed design, and This $180 million infrastructure project is the first undertake construction administration. In late 2016, a piece of a critical multi-modal transportation corridor funding commitment by the federal government pushed connecting downtown Calgary to Chestermere (a for commencement of Phase 2 of the project, which bedroom community on the outskirts of Calgary). The was only at a conceptual design state. Despite this current and future developments along the corridor will tight schedule, our team completed the detailed design, be home to more than 40,000 residents and will provide a construction, and commissioning of both phases on time significant amount of employment in the area.
  • 202 Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route

    202 Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route

    202 light rail time schedule & line map 202 Blue Line - Saddletowne / 69 Street CTrain View In Website Mode The 202 light rail line (Blue Line - Saddletowne / 69 Street CTrain) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) 69 St Station: 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM (2) Saddletowne: 12:06 AM - 11:50 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 202 light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 202 light rail arriving. Direction: 69 St Station 202 light rail Time Schedule 21 stops 69 St Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM Monday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM Sb Saddletowne Ctrain Station 400 Saddletowne Ci Ne, Calgary Tuesday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM Sb Martindale Ctrain Station Wednesday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM 618 Martindale Bv Ne, Calgary Thursday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM Sb Mcknight - Westwinds Ctrain Station Friday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM Sb Whitehorn Ctrain Station Saturday 12:07 AM - 11:51 PM 36 Street NE, Calgary Sb Rundle Ctrain Station Sb Marlborough Ctrain Station 202 light rail Info 815 36 St Ne, Calgary Direction: 69 St Station Stops: 21 Sb Franklin Ctrain Station Trip Duration: 44 min Line Summary: Sb Saddletowne Ctrain Station, Sb Wb Barlow - Max Bell Ctrain Station Martindale Ctrain Station, Sb Mcknight - Westwinds Ctrain Station, Sb Whitehorn Ctrain Station, Sb Wb Zoo Ctrain Station Rundle Ctrain Station, Sb Marlborough Ctrain Memorial Drive NE, Calgary Station, Sb Franklin Ctrain Station, Wb Barlow - Max Bell Ctrain Station, Wb Zoo Ctrain Station, Wb Wb Bridgeland - Memorial Ctrain Station Bridgeland
  • The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6

    The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6

    MTI The InfluenceThe of ServiceTransitPlanning Failure DecisionsSuccess or on Rail Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California The Influence of Service Planning Department of Transportation Decisions on Rail Transit Success or Failure MTI ReportMTI 08-04 MTI Report 08-04 June 2009 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Chair House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee Hans Rat and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des California Institute for community.