Subject Knowledge Notes Middle East Lesson Five: Why Did Israel and Arab Nations Fight Wars, and How Did It Change Who Controlled the Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Subject Knowledge Notes Middle East Lesson Five: Why Did Israel and Arab Nations Fight Wars, and How Did It Change Who Controlled the Region Subject Knowledge Notes Middle East Lesson Five: Why did Israel and Arab nations fight wars, and how did it change who controlled the region The 1947–48 Civil War in Mandatory Palestine was the first phase of the 1948 Palestine war. It broke out after the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution on 29 November 1947 recommending the adoption of the Partition Plan for Palestine. During the civil war, the Jewish and Arab communities of Palestine clashed (the latter supported by the Arab Liberation Army) while the British, who had the obligation to maintain order, organized their withdrawal and intervened only on an occasional basis. When the British Mandate of Palestine expired on 14 May 1948, and with the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, the surrounding Arab states—Egypt, Transjordan, Iraq and Syria—invaded what had just ceased to be Mandatory Palestine, and immediately attacked Israeli forces and several Jewish settlements. The conflict then turned into the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. As a result of the war, the State of Israel controlled both the area that the UN General Assembly Resolution 181 had recommended for the proposed Jewish state as well as almost 60% of the area of Arab state proposed by the 1948 Partition Plan, including the Jaffa, Lydda and Ramle area, Galilee, some parts of the Negev, a wide strip along the Tel Aviv–Jerusalem road, West Jerusalem and some territories in the West Bank. Transjordan took control of the remainder of the former British mandate, which it annexed, and the Egyptian military took control of the Gaza Strip. At the Jericho Conference on 1 December 1948, 2,000 Palestinian delegates called for unification of Palestine and Transjordan as a step toward full Arab unity. No state was created for the Palestinian Arabs. The conflict triggered significant demographic change throughout the Middle East. Around 700,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from their homes in the area that became Israel, and they became Palestinian refugees in what they refer to as Al-Nakba ("the catastrophe"). In the three years following the war, about 700,000 Jews immigrated to Israel, with many of them having been expelled from their previous countries of residence in the Middle East. The Six-Day War was fought between 5 and 10 June 1967 by Israel and the neighboring states of Egypt (known at the time as the United Arab Republic), Jordan, and Syria. The Egyptians were caught by surprise, and nearly the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed with few Israeli losses, giving the Israelis air supremacy. Simultaneously, the Israelis launched a ground offensive into the Gaza Strip and the Sinai, which again caught the Egyptians by surprise. After some initial resistance, Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the evacuation of the Sinai. Israeli forces rushed westward in pursuit of the Egyptians, inflicted heavy losses, and conquered the Sinai. Further Reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict https://www.vox.com/2018/11/20/18079996/israel-palestine-conflict-guide-explainer https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/20436092 Videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHqJ6pgdE-c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWLGaoVunH8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRYZjOuUnlU Lesson Five: Why did Israel and Arab nations fight wars, and how did it change who controlled the region? • Introduce the question for this lesson, explaining that we will look at some of the major wars between Israel and the surrounding nations, and how this changed who controlled different regions (slide 2). • Children independently complete the retrieval practice (slide 4) 5 minutes • Pupils should complete from memory, leaving answers if they are stuck • Circulate to spot common misconceptions. • Display answers for pupils to self-/peer-mark (slide 5) • Remind pupils, again, that this is a contentious and ongoing subject. There is still fighting happening in this region. There are different ‘narratives’ presented by each side. • Everybody reads 1948 Arab-Israeli War. 5 minutes • Partners to complete table for Task 1, revisiting text from previous lesson one if necessary (King David). • Continue reading, and explain that both sides (Jews and Palestinians) felt aggrieved at this point. • Ask pupils to work in partners to revisit the text from the previous lessons to jot notes of reasons that each side might feel aggrieved (slide 6) 10 minutes • Share these notes so that all pupils can improve their own lists. • Read about the 1947 Partition plan (slide 7) • Ask pupils to list choose one of the countries which became involved in the establishment of Israel, and what their motivations might have been. • Share these thoughts to challenge misconceptions and model disciplinary 10 minutes thought. • Continue reading about the establishment of Israel following the 1948 war. • Pupils should look at the map and ask pupils to complete task 3, filling in the gaps. • Display the map on slide 8 to make clear the changing control. 5 minutes • Explain that we will now zoom forward in time to one of the next major conflicts, the Six Day War. • Pupils to analyse the maps (slide 8) to complete Task 4 independently. • Pupils should mention the different sections which were under Israeli control after the Six Day War. 5 minutes • Everybody reads the text on the Six Day War. • Pupils to answer Task 5 and feedback answers to the class. • Ensure pupils are clear about how Israel was fighting Syria, Egypt and Jordan, 5 minutes the surrounding Arab nations in this war. • Read the remaining text, and ask pupils to study the map showing the Israeli offensive in Sinai. • Ask pupils to return to the text and note two reasons that Israel were able to defeat the Arab nations in the Six Day War. 10 minutes • Display the map on slide 9 to show how much land Israel now controlled in the area. • Pupils record 3 key things they have learnt. 5 minutes .
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study of Palestinian Identity in Jordan and Saudi Arabia
    i Abstract Title of Thesis: Distinctions in Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Palestinian Identity in Jordan and Saudi Arabia Erin Hahn, Bachelor of Arts, 2020 Thesis directed by: Professor Victor Lieberman The Palestinian refugee crisis is an ongoing, divisive issue in the Middle East, and the world at large. Palestinians have migrated to six out of seven continents, and formed diaspora communities in all corners of the world. Scholars affirm that the sense of Palestinian national identity is recent, only having formed as a response to the Israeli occupation of the 20th century. This thesis explores the factors that constitute that identity, and asks the question: How have the policies implemented by the Jordanian and Saudi Arabian governments influenced the formation of a national identity among Palestinians in both countries? Through conducting semi-structured interviews, it became apparent that policies of the host countries can have a powerful influence on the formation of identity among groups of displaced people. I argue that Palestinians in Jordan have widely developed a dual sense of national identity, in which they identify with both Jordan and Palestine, to varying degrees. In contrast, due to the more exclusive policies enacted by Saudi Arabia, Palestinians living there feel more isolated from their community, and do not identify as Saudi Arabian. Palestinian identity does not look the same between the two groups, the differences can be traced to policy. This thesis will explore the current state of Palestinian identity in
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory File
    Nuclear Peace in the Levant By: Gregory A. File, B.S. Political Science Thesis Director: Dr. Peter Rudloff, PhD Political Science Second Reader: Dr. James Scott, PhD Political Science 1 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………..3 I. Introduction………………………………………………………..4 II. Literature Review…………………………………………………5 Nuclear Proliferation: The Good…………………………….5 Nuclear Proliferation: The Bad………………………………16 III. Theory………………………………………………………………19 IV. Case Studies………………………………………………………...24 Iraq………………………………………………………………25 Egypt…………………………………………………………….32 Jordan……………………………………………………………40 Lebanon……………………………………………………….....48 Syria……………………………………………………………...56 Summation…………………………………………………….....66 V. The Iranian Threat………………………………………………….69 Friends Now Enemies…………………………………………..70 Going Nuclear…………………………………………………...71 Apocalyptic Government……………………………………….72 The People……………………………………………………….73 Conclusion……………………………………………………….75 VI. Bringing Nuclear Peace to the Levant……………………………..75 Problem………………………………………………………….76 Policy Recommendation………………………………………..77 Summary………………………………………………………..78 VII. Conclusion…………………………………………………………..79 VIII. Bibliography…………………………………………………………82 2 Abstract Ever since the first atomic bomb was dropped over Japan to end World War II, there have been many questions that arise from the use of nuclear bombs. There are two basic arguments for the employment of nuclear weapons. One is the deterrence policy. This ensures that a state will not be attacked by its hostile neighbors. The second is a policy of brinkmanship. This is the policy of using one’s nuclear arsenal to coerce others to give into one’s demands. Both of these policies will be explored in this paper. The main point of this paper is to explore the relations between Israel and the Arab neighbors who were involved in the Arab-Israeli wars. Specifically, the paper will look at when Israel proliferated in order to gain a better understanding if that event played any factor in producing peace/cold peace between Israel and these Arab countries.
    [Show full text]
  • British Army and Palestine Police Deserters and the Arab–Israeli War
    This is a repository copy of British Army and Palestine Police Deserters and the Arab– Israeli War of 1948. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/135106/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Caden, C and Arielli, N (2021) British Army and Palestine Police Deserters and the Arab– Israeli War of 1948. War in History, 28 (1). pp. 200-222. ISSN 0968-3445 https://doi.org/10.1177/0968344518796688 This is an author produced version of a paper accepted for publication in War in History. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 British Army and Palestine Police Deserters and the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 British servicemen and policemen who had been stationed in Palestine towards the end of the British Mandate and deserted their units to serve with either Jewish or Arab forces have only received cursory academic attention.1 Yet, this is a relatively unique occurrence, in the sense that in no other British withdrawal from colonial territories did members from the security forces desert in notable numbers to remain in the territory to partake in hostilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian People
    The Palestinian People The Palestinian People ❖ A HISTORY Baruch Kimmerling Joel S. Migdal HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2003 Copyright © 1994, 2003 by Baruch Kimmerling and Joel S. Migdal All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America An earlier version of this book was published in 1994 as Palestinians: The Making of a People Cataloging-in-Publication data available from the Library of Congress ISBN 0-674-01131-7 (cloth) ISBN 0-674-01129-5 (paper) To the Palestinians and Israelis working and hoping for a mutually acceptable, negotiated settlement to their century-long conflict CONTENTS Maps ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xxi Note on Transliteration xxiii Introduction xxv Part One FROM REVOLT TO REVOLT: THE ENCOUNTER WITH THE EUROPEAN WORLD AND ZIONISM 1. The Revolt of 1834 and the Making of Modern Palestine 3 2. The City: Between Nablus and Jaffa 38 3. Jerusalem: Notables and Nationalism 67 4. The Arab Revolt, 1936–1939 102 vii Contents Part Two DISPERSAL 5. The Meaning of Disaster 135 Part Three RECONSTITUTING THE PALESTINIAN NATION 6. Odd Man Out: Arabs in Israel 169 7. Dispersal, 1948–1967 214 8. The Feday: Rebirth and Resistance 240 9. Steering a Path under Occupation 274 Part Four ABORTIVE RECONCILIATION 10. The Oslo Process: What Went Right? 315 11. The Oslo Process: What Went Wrong? 355 Conclusion 398 Chronological List of Major Events 419 Notes 457 Index 547 viii MAPS 1. Palestine under Ottoman Rule 39 2. Two Partitions of Palestine (1921, 1949) 148 3. United Nations Recommendation for Two-States Solution in Palestine (1947) 149 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Nationalism
    Arab Nationalism Journal of Integrative International Relations, 5:1 (2020) 1-32 Copyright © Department of International Relations UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ISSN 2477-3557 (Print) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4785114 Arab Nationalism: Past, Present, and Future Hadza Min Fadhli Robby Department of International Relations, Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta Email: [email protected] Abstract This article would like to discuss the development of Arab Nationalism throughout history. Arab Nationalism is discussed intially as a part of resistance against Turkish and Ottoman power. The construction of enmity between Arab and Turkish nation became one of the most important feature of Arab Nationalism. However, the enmity against Turkish nation was not the only factor contributing to the Arab Nationalism. The existence of Arab nationalist movement and rise of Arab intellectuals gave the momentum for Arab nationalism to obtain a prominent place. As Arab nations declared their independence, there are aspirations which seeks Arab nations to be united into one country. One such ideal was brought up by Gamal Abdel Nasser, previously the President of Arab Republic of Egypt. Arab Nationalism experienced its hey-day during these days, but soon after, loses its charm after the war with Israel. This paper will also discuss the problems and reasons behind the decline of Arab Nationalism. Tulisan ini akan membahas tentang perkembangan nasionalisme Arab sepanjang sejarah. Awalnya, nasionalisme Arab tumbuh sebagai sebuah konstruk dan perlawanan terhadap kuasa Turki dan Usmani. Namun, seiring dengan tumbuhnya pergerakan akar rumput yang memperjuangkan nasionalisme Arab dan kebangkitan intelektual Arab, gerakan nasionalisme Arab mulai mendapatkan pamornya di tengah masyarakat Arab.
    [Show full text]
  • 1948 Arab‒Israeli
    1948 Arab–Israeli War 1 1948 Arab–Israeli War מלחמת or מלחמת העצמאות :The 1948 Arab–Israeli War, known to Israelis as the War of Independence (Hebrew ,מלחמת השחרור :, Milkhemet Ha'atzma'ut or Milkhemet HA'sikhror) or War of Liberation (Hebrewהשחרור Milkhemet Hashikhrur) – was the first in a series of wars fought between the State of Israel and its Arab neighbours in the continuing Arab-Israeli conflict. The war commenced upon the termination of the British Mandate of Palestine and the Israeli declaration of independence on 15 May 1948, following a period of civil war in 1947–1948. The fighting took place mostly on the former territory of the British Mandate and for a short time also in the Sinai Peninsula and southern Lebanon.[1] ., al-Nakba) occurred amidst this warﺍﻟﻨﻜﺒﺔ :Much of what Arabs refer to as The Catastrophe (Arabic The war concluded with the 1949 Armistice Agreements. Background Following World War II, on May 14, 1948, the British Mandate of Palestine came to an end. The surrounding Arab nations were also emerging from colonial rule. Transjordan, under the Hashemite ruler Abdullah I, gained independence from Britain in 1946 and was called Jordan, but it remained under heavy British influence. Egypt, while nominally independent, signed the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936 that included provisions by which Britain would maintain a garrison of troops on the Suez Canal. From 1945 on, Egypt attempted to renegotiate the terms of this treaty, which was viewed as a humiliating vestige of colonialism. Lebanon became an independent state in 1943, but French troops would not withdraw until 1946, the same year that Syria won its independence from France.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on the Question of Jerusalem
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE QUESTION OF JERUSALEM "Preserving the cultural and religious cliarater of Jerusalem" Geneva, 27 - 28 June 2019 CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY PLENARY II Challenges to safeguarding the cultural heritage of Jerusalem Restoration of Islamic cultural sites and the Hashemite custodianship in Jerusalem Paper presented by Mr. Wasfi Kailani Director of the Royal Hashemite Fund for the Restoration of Al-Aqsa CPR/ICQJ/5 aThe Hashemite Kings' Custodianship and Consenrahon of Jerusalem Muslim and Christian Holy Sites 1917-2019 BY Wasfi Kailani (PhD), Jerusalem Affairs Manager at the Royal Hashemite Court; Director of the Hashemite Fund for the Restoration of Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock; Presented to The International Conference of on the Question of Jerusalem, under the theme of (Preserving the cxdtural and religious character ofJerxisalenl' 27-28 June 2019, UN Office in Geneva (UNOG) Organized by United Nations Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People in Cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Introduction Starting from 1917 and continuing through 2019, the Hashemite Kings' Custodianship of Je;salem Holy Sites noticeably contributed to the preservation of the authentic cultural and religious chajacter of Jerusalem and its holy sites. His Majesty King Abdullah II inherited the custodianship of Jerusalem Muslim and Cbristian holy sites from his Hashemite fathers starting by his Grand Father King and Sabrif Husseinl Bin Ali. Recent confirmation of this role. was the 1988 King Hussein's exclusion of East Jerusalem Holy Sites and Waqf properties from the declaration of Jordan's disengagement with the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Factionalism and the Traditional Palestinian Arab Leadership's Resistance to British and Jordanian Political Policy (1920-1967): a Reconsideration
    Bibliotheque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographic Services Branch des services Dibliographiques 395 Wellinaton Street 395. rue Wellingron Ottawa (Ontarlo) KIA ON4 NOTICE The quality of this microform is La qualite de cette microforme heavily dependent upon the depend grandement de la qualit6 quality of the original thesis de la thhe soumise au submitted for microfilming. microfilmage. Nous avons tout Every effort has been made to fait pour assurer une qualite ensure the highest quality of superieure de reproduction. reproduction possibie. If pages are missing, contact the S'il manque des pages, veuillez university which granted the communiquer avec I'universite degree. qui a confere le grade. Some pages may have indistinct La qualite d'impression de print especially if the original certaines pages peut hisser a pages were typed with a poor desirer, surtout si les pages typewriter ribbon or if the originales ont &e university sent us an inferior dactylographiees a I'aide d'un photocopy. ruban use ou si I'universite nous a fait parvenir une photocopie de qualite inferieure. Reproduction in full or in part of La reproduction, mlme partielle, this microform Is governed by de cette microfarme es! soumise the Canadian Copyright Act, a la Loi canadienne sur le droit R.S.C. 1970, c. C-30, and d'auteur, SRC 1970, c. C-30, et subsequent amendments. ses amendements subsbquents. FACTJONALISM AND THE TRADITIONAL PALESTINIAN ARAB LEADERSHIP'S RESISTANCE TO BRITISH AND JORDANIAN POLITICAL POLICY (1920-1967): A RECONSIDERATION Roger P. Dietrich B .A. (Honours), Simon Fraser University, 1991 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History O Roger P.
    [Show full text]
  • Statiscal Data Collection Project on Film and Audiovisual Markets in 9 Mediterranean Countries
    EU funded Programme STATISCAL DATA COLLECTION PROJECT ON FILM AND AUDIOVISUAL MARKETS IN 9 MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES Country Profile: 5. Palestine EUROMED AUDIOVISUAL III / CDSU in collaboration with the EUROPEAN AUDIOVISUAL OBSERVATORY Dr. Sahar Ali, Media Expert, CDSU Euromed Audiovisual III Under the supervision of Dr. André Lange, Head of the Department for Information on Markets and Financing, European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe) Tunis, November 10, 2013 Responsibility Disclaimer “The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Euromed Audiovisual III programme and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union, or of the European Audiovisual Observatory or of the Council of Europe of which it is part.” The report is available on the programme website: www.euromedaudiovisual.net Film and audiovisual data collection project NATIONAL AUDIOVISUAL LANDSCAPES IN NINE PARTNER COUNTRIES PALESTINE 1. BASIC DATA ..................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Benchmarks ............................................................................................................................7 1.3 Domestic policy ........................................................................................................................8 1.4 Membership of Palestine and
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Lewis: the Middle East Study Guide
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government 2004 Bernard Lewis: The Middle East Study Guide Steven Alan Samson Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Samson, Steven Alan, "Bernard Lewis: The Middle East Study Guide" (2004). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 152. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/152 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BERNARD LEWIS: THE MIDDLE EAST STUDY GUIDE, 2004 Steven Alan Samson CHAPTER EIGHTEEN: FROM WAR TO WAR Outline A. OTTOMAN EMPIRE (332-34) 1. Ottoman-Iranian Contest for Regional Hegemony a. Eclipse of Both Contenders b. Replacement by External Powers 2. Ottoman Wars against Internal Enemies a. Nationalist Christian Movements b. Ottoman Pashas 1) Muhammad Ali 3. Arab Leaders a. Lebanon b. Arabian Peninsula 1) Kuwait 4. Wahhabism a. Abd al-Wahhab b. Muhammad ibn Saud [ancestor of Saudi Arabia’s founder] c. Attack Repelled by Ottomans 5. European Powers a. Russia 1) Western Intervention 6. Eastern Question a. European Rivalries b. Austria, France, and Russia Blocked c. Crimean War d. British Diplomatic Intervention, 1878: Postponed Dissolution B. IRAN (334-36) 1. Napoleon 2. Russian and British Expansionism [Struggle to Control Central Asia known as the “Great Game”] a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Palestinian Centrality
    The Myth of Palestinian Centrality Efraim Karsh Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 108 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 108 The Myth of Palestinian Centrality Efraim Karsh The Myth of Palestinian Centrality Efraim Karsh © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] http://www.besacenter.org ISSN 1565-9895 July 2014 Cover picture: The State of Israel National Photo Collection/ Avi Ohayon The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies advances a realist, conservative, and Zionist agenda in the search for security and peace for Israel. It was named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace lay the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. The center conducts policy-relevant research on strategic subjects, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and Middle East regional affairs. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]