DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 5 Lincoln Laboratory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 5 Lincoln Laboratory Section 5 Lincoln Laboratory Lincoln Laboratory—Past and Future 77 Major Programs/Prototypes 79 Major Technology Transfers 80 Lincoln Laboratory Mission Areas 81 Lincoln Laboratory Technical Staff 82 Lincoln Laboratory’s Economic Impact 82 MIT/Lincoln Laboratory Interactions 83 Test Facilities and Field Sites 84 Lincoln Laboratory Outreach Metrics 85 75 MIT Briefing Book • The Laboratory’s advanced imaging ladar system Lincoln Laboratory was flown over Puerto Rico to generate a base- MIT Lincoln Laboratory is a federally funded research line map of ground conditions that will be used and development center (FFRDC) operated by the Insti- to direct U.S. recovery efforts if a disastrous tute under contract with the Department of Defense hurricane hits again. (DoD). The Laboratory’s core competencies are in • The Micro-sized Microwave Atmospheric sensors, information extraction (signal processing and Satellite CubeSat, launched into low Earth orbit embedded computing), communications, integrated in early 2018, successfully demonstrated an sensing, and decision support, all supported by a advanced compact microwave sounder and strong program in advanced electronics technology. provided the first multiband radiometer measurements from a CubeSat payload. Lincoln Laboratory’s mission is to apply technology to problems of national security. Technology devel- • A NASA probe called the Transiting Exoplanet opment is focused on these research areas—space Survey Satellite (TESS) was launched into orbit control; air, missile, and maritime defense technology; last spring. This probe, developed with the MIT communication systems; cyber security and informa- Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Re- tion sciences; intelligence, surveillance, and recon- search, and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, naissance systems; advanced technologies; artificial will search for Earth-like planets that may have intelligence; bioengineering and biomedical research; the possibility of harboring life. autonomous systems; microelectronics; quantum systems; energy; tactical systems; and homeland • Through our R&D into technology to protect protection; as well as nondefense projects in air traffic the nation’s critical infrastructure, such as control and weather surveillance. mass transit systems, against explosive attacks, we demonstrated a system to detect threats Two of our principal objectives are (1) development concealed on persons who are in areas of high of components and systems for experiments, engi- pedestrian traffic. neering measurements, and tests under field oper- ating conditions and (2) dissemination of information • A new field-programmable imaging array inte- to the government, academia, and industry. Program grated circuit that can be reused by multiple activities extend from fundamental investigations ladar and imaging systems greatly extends the through the design process, to field demonstrations of capabilities of the widely adaptable digital focal prototype systems. Emphasis is placed on transitioning plane array we developed. systems and technology to operational use in military • We successfully demonstrated the first deployments and to the defense industry. balloon-based communications relay array, which used ten balloon-borne payloads to MIT Lincoln Laboratory also maintains long-term achieve over-the-horizon communications competency, retains high-quality staff, provides inde- despite co-channel interference. pendent perspective on critical issues, sustains stra- tegic sponsor relationships, and develops technology • Our energy resilience analysis methodology for long-term interests and short-term, high-priority and software were deployed to 27 Depart- needs of our DoD sponsors. Significant milestones ment of Defense installations around the world reached in several areas represent only a fraction of and are slated to be adopted by more military the technology developed over the past year. installations for future energy assessments. • A novel infrared search-and-track system that was tested in maritime environments will be • We have developed architectures that allow us used to inform the design of a future naval to integrate cyber security into small satellites. sensor for persistent surveillance. 76 MIT Briefing Book Lincoln Laboratory Lincoln Laboratory—Past and Future 100s of radars to an array of command centers, trans- formed computing by pioneering the magnetic core The Founding of MIT Lincoln Laboratory memory, and spawned several defense companies. In September 1949, President Truman announced that the rumors of a Soviet nuclear capability were Lincoln Laboratory as an FFRDC well founded; the world had evidence that an atomic Lincoln Laboratory was founded as a federally funded bomb had been tested by the Soviets in August. research and development center (FFRDC). An FFRDC This news and the subsequent confirmation that assists the U.S. government with scientific research the Soviet Union had developed long-range aircraft and analysis, systems development, and systems capable of reaching the United States via an Arctic acquisition to provide novel, cost-effective solutions route caused the Department of Defense to examine to complex government problems. Combining the its defenses against an air attack. When the DoD expertise and outlook of government, industry, and determined that the nation did not have an effective, academia, FFRDCs are independent, nonprofit labs modern system that would provide timely warning that are prohibited from competing with industry or of, and then engage countermeasures to, a nuclear working for commercial companies. air strike, it tasked the Air Force with improving U.S. air defenses. Each FFRDC is sponsored by a government agency but is privately managed by a university or another A committee led by the Air Force and made up of not-for-profit organization. Currently, 42 FFRDCs are experts in aeronautics, physics, and radar studied providing various U.S. government agencies with the problem and proposed the creation of a labora- R&D in fields ranging from defense to energy, space, tory to develop a new air defense system. Because and health and human services. Lincoln Laboratory of the seminal, and revolutionary, work on radar is a Department of Defense FFRDC, managed by MIT systems done at MIT’s Radiation Laboratory to under a contract with the U.S. Air Force. support the Allies’ efforts during World War II, this Air Defense Systems Engineering Committee Lincoln Laboratory’s Move to the Future proposed the laboratory be run by MIT. After the SAGE system was completed, Lincoln Laboratory—with its technological experience, The Lincoln Laboratory Site at Hanscom AFB excellent technical staff, and lab and computing MIT President James Killian initially was not eager to facilities—was positioned to tackle new DoD prob- engage the Institute in another long-term, complex, lems, a chief one being the advent of ballistic missiles. and classified military project, preferring to see MIT For 68 years, Lincoln Laboratory has found new resources return to the mission of education and challenges to undertake, applying its deep and broad open research. However, he finally agreed to this knowledge of sensors and signal processing to devel- new venture, but with the stipulation that the labo- oping technology for not only air and missile defense ratory be located away from the MIT campus, which but also communication systems, space systems, he wished to maintain as a research environment advanced imaging, and more recently bioengineering, unencumbered by security restrictions. cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. The Air Force, which was the sponsor for the new To support the wide variety of its work that requires air defense system, already owned the Hanscom advanced microelectronics, Lincoln Laboratory is AFB site. It had ample space for a new facility and undertaking the construction of a Compound Semi- access to Air Force consultants. So in 1951, construc- conductor Laboratory and Microsystem Integration tion began on the buildings that would be the home Facility. The new facility will be part of the research of R&D into the radar-based air defense system called complex that still contains the four original 1951-era SAGE (for Semi-Automatic Ground Environment). For buildings, the Microelectronics Laboratory built in the the next six years, Lincoln Laboratory developed the early 1990s, and South Laboratory completed in 1995. SAGE system, which eventually digitally connected 77 MIT Briefing Book Breakdown of Laboratory Program Funding Total Funding FY2018*= $1,027.1 million Sponsor Mission Area Tactical Systems Advanced Technology 11% 12% Non- Advanced Research Department ISR Systems and of Defense Portfolio 13% Technology 4% 8% Homeland Protection 9% Aviation Space Control Research—FAA 15% 3% Air Defense 6% Department of Defense Cyber Security and 87% Information Sciences Ballistic Missile 7% Defense 8% Communication Systems 17% Total Funding Fiscal Years 2014–2018* $1,200 $1,000 137.7 91.8 128.4 80.5 94.5 881.0 886.9 889.4 $800 851.3 842.8 $600 $400 Authorized Funding in Millions in Funding Authorized $200 $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Fiscal Year Department of Defense Other Programs *Lincoln Laboratory fiscal year runs concurrent with the U.S. Government fiscal year, October 1–September 30. 78 MIT Briefing Book Lincoln Laboratory Major Programs/Prototypes the CCDs, which allows the CCD to collect more light at the pixel level. Scientists expect TESS to discover Early Alerts to Pathogen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LORAN-A Historic Context
    ' . Prepared by Alice Coneybeer U.S. Coast Guard, MLCP (se) Coast Guard Island, Bldg. 540 Alameda, CA 94501-5100 Phone 510.437.5804 Fax 510.437.5753 U.S. Coast Guard- Maintenance & Logistics Command Pacific • • • • • • • • • • LORAN-A Historic Context Alaska (District 17) September 1998 ENCLOSURE(2.} ( LORAN-A Context 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS .........•.....................................................•......................•........•..................................•. 1 2. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 2 3. IDSTORY OF LORAN-A STATIONS.............................................................................................................. 2 4. LORAN-A IN ALASKA. ..................................................................................................................................... 3 5. LORAN-A DURING THE COLD WAR IN ALASKA (1945-1989) ............................................................... 4 6. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGffiiLITY EVALUATION .............................................................................. 4 6.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF TilE DEVELOPMENT OF AIDS TONAVIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF WORLD WAR II IN ALASKA .............. 5 6.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE HISTORIC CONTEXT
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing the Endless Frontier: the Effects of the World War II Research
    Inventing the Endless Frontier: The Effects of the World War II Research Effort on Post-war Innovation∗ Daniel P. Gross† Bhaven N. Sampat‡ Harvard Business School and NBER Columbia University and NBER June 2, 2020 first draft: June 2, 2020 Abstract: During World War II, the U.S. government launched an unprecedented effort to mobi- lize science for war: the newly-established Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) entered thousands of R&D contracts with industrial and academic contractors, spending one to two orders of magnitude more than what the government was previously investing in science. In this pa- per, we study the long-run effects of the OSRD-supported research effort on U.S. invention. Using data on all OSRD contracts, we show that these investments had large effects on the direction and location of U.S. invention and high-tech industrial employment, setting in motion agglomeration forces which shaped the technology clusters of the postwar era. Our results demonstrate the effects of a large, mission-driven government R&D program on the growth of domestic technology clusters and long-run technological progress. JEL Classification: H56, N42, N72, O31, O32, O33, O38, R11 Keywords: World War II; Vannevar Bush; OSRD; Mission-oriented R&D; Direction of Innovation; Geography of Innovation; Technology Clusters; U.S. Innovation System ∗We thank Ashish Arora, Pierre Azoulay, Wes Cohen, Jon Gruber, Adam Jaffe, Simon Johnson, Tom Nicholas, Scott Stern, and audiences at the HBS Faculty Research Symposium and the Urban Economics Association meetings (discussant Alex Whalley) for helpful comments. We also thank Hayley Pallan, Greg Saldutte, and Innessa Colaiacovo for outstanding research assistance, and the Harvard Business School Division of Faculty and Research Development and NBER Innovation Policy grant (2016) for financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Waveguide Handbook 1946
    WAVE GUIDE HANDBOOK 1 \L.—‘. i “; +’/ i MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY RADIATION LABORATORY SERIES Boardof Editors LouM N. RIDENOUR, Editor-in-Chief GEORQE 13. COLLINS, Deputy Editor-in-Chief BRITTON CHANCE, S. A. GOUDSMIT, R. G. HERB, HUBERT M. JAMES, JULIAN K. KNIPP, JAMES L. LAWSON, LEON B. LINFORD, CAROL G. MONTGOMERY, C. NEWTON, ALRERT M. STONE, LouIs A. TURNER, GEORCE E. VALLEY, JR., HERBERT H. WHEATON 1. RADAR SYSTEM ENGINEERING—Ridenour 2. RADAR AIDS TO NAVIGATION-HU1l 3. RADAR BEAcoNs—RoberL9 4. LORAN—P&Ce, McKen~ie, and Woodward 5. PULSE GENERATORS<laSOe and Lebacqz 6. MICROWAVE MA~NETRoNs—Co~ks 7. KLYSTRONS AND MICROWAVE TRIoDEs—Hamalton, Knipp, and Kuper 8. PRINCIPLES OF MICROWAVE Cmcums-Montgornery, Dicke, and Purcell I 9. MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION CIRc!uITs-Ragan 10.WAVEGUIDE HANDBooK—Marcuuitz 11.TECIINIQUE OF MICROWAVE MEASUREMENTS—MOnlgO?Wry 12.MICROWAVE ANTENNA THEORY AND DEslaN—Siker 13.PROPAGATION OF SHORT RADIO WAvEs—Kerr 14.MICROWAVE DUPLEXERS—&72Ulk and Montgomery 15.CRYSTAL Rectifiers—Torrey and Whitmer 16.MICROWAVE Mxxrms—pound 17.COMPONENTS Hm’mBooK—Blackburn 18.VACUUM TUBE AWPLIFIERs—Valley and Wazlman 19.WAVEFORMS—ChanC.?, Hughes, MacNichol, Sayre, and Williams 20.ELECTRONIC TIME Measurements—Chance, Hulsizei’, MacNichol, and Williams 21.ELECTRONIC lNsTRuMENTs~reenwood, Holdam, and MacRae 22.CATHODE RAY TUBE DIsPLAYs—Soiler, ~tarr, and Valley 23.MICROWAVE RECEIVERS—Van Voorhis 24.THRESHOLD &QNALS-LaW90n and Uhlenbeck 25.THEORY OF SERvoMEcIIANIsh f-James, Nichols, and Phillips 26.RADAR SCANNERS AND RADoMEs—Cady, Karelitz, and Turner 27.COMPUTINQ MECHANISMS AND LINKA~E9—&ObOdO 28.lNDEX—Ht?nneY . LL WAVEGUIDE ~HANDBOOK Edited by N. MARCUVITZ - ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR Ok- ELECTIUC.4L ENGINEERING POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF BROOKLYN OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC REsEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH COMMITTEE FIRST EDITION NEW YORK .
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Development at Lincoln Laboratory: an Overview of the First Fifty Years Radar Development at Lincoln Laboratory: an Overview of the First Fifty Years
    • DELANEY AND WARD Radar Development at Lincoln Laboratory: An Overview of the First Fifty Years Radar Development at Lincoln Laboratory: An Overview of the First Fifty Years William P. Delaney and William W. Ward I This article provides an overview of the first fifty years of radar development at Lincoln Laboratory. It begins by reviewing early Laboratory efforts in North American air defense, which quickly branched into efforts in missile defense and space surveillance as the Soviet Union developed missiles and launched satellites into space. In the 1970s, two other radar-intensive activities began at the Laboratory: a program in tactical surveillance arose out of the challenges of the Vietnam War, and a program in air traffic control responded to the need to modernize systems for control of civilian aircraft. Research in advanced air defense also returned to the Laboratory with the advent of the modern cruise missile. This article summarizes these major Laboratory radar programs in a synoptic fashion, which can serve the reader as a road map to the ensuing fourteen articles, each of which provides a more in-depth view of the Laboratory’s radar developments. - Laboratory directly involve radar development, tech- ogy has been involved in radar development nology, or experimentation. Tsince 1940, when the security challenges of World War II inspired the development of working Fifty Years of Radar Development military radars based on ideas and crude experiments The cartoon “tree” of Figure 1 is a simple graphic way of earlier decades. The MIT Radiation Laboratory to convey a macroscopic view of radar developments was a focal point for much of the Allied development at Lincoln Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP
    ApJ, in press, January 5, 2007 Three Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Polarization Analysis L. Page1, G. Hinshaw2, E. Komatsu 12, M. R. Nolta 9, D. N. Spergel 5, C. L. Bennett10, C. Barnes1, R. Bean5,8, O. Dor´e5,9, J. Dunkley1,5, M. Halpern 3, R. S. Hill2, N. Jarosik 1, A. Kogut 2, M. Limon 2, S. S. Meyer 4, N. Odegard 2, H. V. Peiris 4,14, G. S. Tucker 6, L. Verde 13, J. L. Weiland2, E. Wollack 2, E. L. Wright 7 [email protected] ABSTRACT The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) has mapped the entire sky in five frequency bands between 23 and 94 GHz with polarization sensitive radiometers. We present three-year full-sky maps of the polarization and analyze 1Dept. of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-0708 2Code 665, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 3Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z1 4Depts. of Astrophysics and Physics, KICP and EFI, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 5 arXiv:astro-ph/0603450v2 27 Feb 2007 Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001 6Dept. of Physics, Brown University, 182 Hope St., Providence, RI 02912-1843 7UCLA Astronomy, PO Box 951562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562 8612 Space Sciences Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 9Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, 60 St. George St, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada M5S 3H8 10Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218-2686 12Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report Issue I ~-- __ - Volume 81 Number 1
    MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN PRESIDENT'S REPORT ISSUE I ~-- __ - VOLUME 81 NUMBER 1 OCTOBER, 1945 Published by Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Entered July 3, 1933, at the Post Office, Boston, Massachusetts, as second-class matter under Act of Congress of August 24, 1912z. Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Station, Boston, Massachusetts, in February, June, August, and October. Issues of the BULLETIN include the reports of the President and of the Treasurer, the General Catalogue, the Undergraduate Course Schedules, and the Directory of Officers and Students. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN President's Report Issue I944-1945 VOLUME 81 NUMBER I OCTOBER, 1945 PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE, CAMBRIDGE THE CORPORATION 1945-1946 President KARL T. COMPTON Secretary Treasurer WALTER HUMPHREYS HORACE S. FORD LIFE MEMBERS W. CAMERON FORBES JOHN R. MACOMBER WILLIS R. WHITNEY EDWIN S. WEBSTER ALFRED L. LooMIs* GORDON S. RENTSCHLER PIERRE S. DU PONT HARLOW SHAPLEY VANNEVAR BUSH* HARRY J. CARLSON ALFRED P. SLOAN, JR. WILLIAM EMERSON GERARD SWOPE LAMMOT DU PONT RALPH E. FLANDERS FRANKLIN W. HOBBS FRANK B. JEWETT JAMES M. BARKER JOSEPH W. POWELL REDFIELD PROCTOR THOMAS C. DESMOND JOHN E. ALDRED GODFREY L. CABOT J. WILLARD HAYDEN WALTER HUMPHREYS WILLIAM C. POTTER WILLIAM S. NEWELL VICTOR M. CUTTER BRADLEY DEWEY Lou's S. CATES ALBERT H. WIGGIN HENRY E. WORCESTER MARSHALL B. DALTON FRANCIS J. CHESTERMAN SPECIAL TERM MEMBERS Term Expires January, 1946 Term Expires January, 1947 Term Expires January,1948 CHARLES E. SPENCER, JR. WILLARD H. Dow PHILLIPS KETCHUM Term Expires January, 1949 Term Expires January, Q950 GEORGE A.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory and MIT Campus [PDF]
    Topics in Research Administration MIT Lincoln Laboratory and MIT Campus April 2, 2019 Topics in Research Administration Agenda 10:30 Welcome and Introductions Carol Wood, Director, Research Administration Support, Office of the Vice President for Research Claude Canizares, former Vice President for Research at MIT and Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics, Session Moderator 10:35 MIT Lincoln Lab Overview Scott Anderson, Assistant Director for Operations, MIT Lincoln Laboratory MIT Lincoln Lab and MIT Campus Interactions Robert Bond, Chief Technology Officer, MIT Lincoln Laboratory 11:15 Panel Discussion – MIT Lincoln Lab and MIT Campus operations Scott Anderson, Assistant Director for Operations, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Mike Corcoran, Assistant Director, Grant and Contracts Administration, Office of Sponsored Programs Kara DeNutte, Senior Fiscal Officer, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research Questions & Answers 12:00 Close MIT Lincoln Laboratory Overview Scott Anderson, Assistant Director for Operations Presentation to MIT Research Administration 2 April 2019 This work is sponsored by the Department of the Air Force under contract FA8721- 05--C-0002 and FA8702-15-D-0001 Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government. MIT Lincoln Laboratory The Beginning World War II Support Support Following World War II MIT Building 20 Hanscom AFB MIT Radiation Laboratory MIT
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Radiation Laboratory Series: Chapter Headings and Authors
    MIT Radiation Laboratory Series: Chapter headings and authors. v1.01 4th March 2013. D W Knight. Volumes (pdf) can be downloaded from: http://www.febo.com/pages/docs/RadLab/ [accessed 4th March 2013] http://www.bunkerofdoom.com/lit/mitser/ [accessed 4th March 2013] 1. Radar System Engineering. Louis N Ridenour. 1947. 1. Introduction. L N Ridenour. p1. 2. The Radar equation. E M Purcell. p18. 3. Properties of Radar targets. A J F Siegert, L N Ridenour, M H Johnson. p63. 4. Limitations of pulse Radar. E M Purcell. p116. 5. CW Radar systems. W W Hansen. p127. 6. The gathering and presentation of Radar data. L N Ridenour, L J Haworth, B V Bowden, E C Pollard. p160. 7. The employment of Radar data. B V Bowden, L J Haworth, L N Ridenour & C L Zimmerman. p213. 8. Radar beacons. L A Turner. p243. 9. Antennas, scanners and stabilization. W M Cady, C V Robinson, F B Lincoln & F J Mehringer. p271. 10. The Magnetron and the pulser. G B Collins, J V Lebacqz & M G White. p320. 11. RF components. A E Whitford. p291. 12. The receiving system - Radar receivers. L J Haworth & W H Jordan. p433. 13. The receiving system - Indicators. L J Haworth, p475. 14. Prime power supplies for Radar. M M Hubbard & P C Jacobs, p555. 15. Examples of Radar system design. R G Herb & R L Sinsheimer. p588. 16. Moving target indication. A G Emslie & R A McConnell. p626. 17. Radar relay. L J Haworth and G F Tape. p680. Index. p737 - 748. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Lax 1915–2015
    Benjamin Lax 1915–2015 A Biographical Memoir by Roshan L. Aggarwal and Marion B. Reine ©2016 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. BENJAMIN LAX December 29, 1915–April 21, 2015 Elected to the NAS, 1969 Benjamin Lax made significant and lasting contributions to solid-state physics and engineering. He innovated new resonance phenomena, including cyclotron reso- nance, to determine the basic band structure of semi- conductors. He pioneered the field of magneto-optics and made important theoretical contributions that led to the demonstration of the first semiconductor GaAs diode laser. His seminal basic and applied research on semicon- ductor physics and engineering, which included solid- state plasmas and quantum electronics, provided a foun- dation for the development of semiconductor technology. The locus of Ben’s sixty-year career was the Massachu- setts Institute of Technology (MIT). His career began By Roshan L. Aggarwal1 during World War II at the MIT Radiation Laboratory on and Marion B. Reine2 the MIT campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. After the war, in 1951, he joined the recently formed MIT Lincoln Laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts, where in 1958 he became the head of the Solid State Division and in 1964 the associate director of the Lincoln Laboratory. He champi- oned and secured funding for the Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory located on the MIT campus, and in 1960 he became the founding director of that laboratory. In 1965, he became a professor in the MIT Department of Physics, where he supervised thirty-six MIT doctoral students over a thirty-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Office of Public Relations Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetta 0213C Telephone: UN 4-6900, Ext
    MIT Institute Archives & Special Collections. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. News Office (AC0069) From the Office of Public Relations Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetta 0213c Telephone: UN 4-6900, Ext. 2701-5 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Dr. John Clarke Slater, Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology and one of the world's leading solid state physicists, will retire effective July 1 after 36 years of teaching and research at M.I.T. Dr. Slater for the past several years has been dividing his time between M.I.T. and the University of Florida at Gainesville where he holds appointment as Graduate Research Professor of Physics. Following official retirement with the title of Institute Professor Emeritus, Dr. Slater plans to continue both associations. Always at the forefront of major scientific advances of his time, Dr. Slater as a young scientist studied with the great physicists Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr and over the years has been closely associated with the development of quantum theory and modern physics. In his research, Dr. Slater made such fundamental contributions to the science underlying the transistor that Dr. Mervin J. Kelly, former president of Bell Telephone Labora- tories, was to say of him: "As organizer of the basic research program in semiconductors at Bell Laboratories that led to the monumental invention of the transistor, may I say that had it not been )or the prior work of M.I.T.'s Professor John C. Slater and a few other academi- cians in solid state physics, the team of scientists at Bell Laboratories could not have made the transistor invention." Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Loran-C Navigation and Timing
    narionsi t5urea« or standarefl FEB 2 0 1973 (Pdico the Development of Loran-C 7^^"^ Navigation and Timing Gifford Hefley Institute for Basic Standards U > i National Bureau of Standards Boulder, Colorado 80302 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Peter G. Peterson, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Lawrence M. Kushner, Aciing D/rec/or, Issued October 1972 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 72-600267 National Bureau of Standards Monograph 129 Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Monogr. 129, 157 pages (Oct. 1972) CODEN: NBSMA6 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Order by SD Catalog No. C13.44:129). Price $4.50. Stock Number 0303-01060 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page iv LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES viii ABSTRACT ix FOREWORD, L. E. Gatterer X FOREWORD, Robert H. Doherty xi PREFACE 1 1. INTRODUCTION 5 EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF LORAN AND GEE 2. 8 3. LOW- FREQUENCY LORAN, CYCLAN AND WHYN 25 4. CYTAC DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY TESTS 35 5. CYTAC FIELD TESTS 35 5.1. General Description of Test Program 39 5.2. Summary of Field Measurements 39 5.2.1. Baseline Extension Measurements 42 5.2.2. Random Errors 47 5.2.3. Systematic Errors 47 5.2.4. Flight Tests (Random and Systematic Errors) 59 5.3. Rate of Change of Systematic Errors 63 5.4. Localized Phase Errors 64 5.5. Instrumentation Errors 66 5.6. Temporal Variations 68 5.7. Skywaves 6. LORAN-C — AN OPERATIONAL SYSTEM 72 7. LORAN-C TIMING 9 3 7.1. Background 9 3 7.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Radar
    Under the Radar Physics, Engineering, and the Distortion of a World War Two Legacy A thesis presented by Raphael Chayim Rosen to The Department of the History of Science in partial fulfillment for an honors degree in History and Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2006 Under the Radar Physics, Engineering, and the Distortion of a World War Two Legacy Raphael Chayim Rosen Abstract This thesis examines the historical legacy of microwave radar development during World War II. At the M.I.T. Radiation Laboratory in 1940-1941, physicists attempted to construct a working microwave radar set. These physicists heavily relied upon engineering skills: focusing on enhancing the efficiency and efficacy of specific components of radar technology. In the postwar era, as a result of the new celebrity of physicists, their wartime inventions, including microwave radar, became associated with physics itself, not engineering. The community of engineers lacked the authority and recognition necessary to reclaim a share of the credit for their discipline. Physicists never emphasized engineering’s importance, because they did not see it as containing independent forms of knowledge or creativity and so did not believe it had played a key role in their inventiveness. This thesis concludes with a brief investigation of engineering’s endogenous forms of knowledge and their relation to the Radiation Laboratory. Keywords M.I.T. Radiation Laboratory Microwave Radar World War II Engineering History of Physics Public Opinion Epistemology Contents Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………..5 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 7 One: Engineering Ascendant…………………………………………………….. 14 Irradiating the Heavens: Radar Physics in November 1940…………. 21 Targets Acquired: Radar Components in November 1940…………..
    [Show full text]