Caitlin Elaine Mader

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Caitlin Elaine Mader Ecology and life history of Coccophagus gossypariae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of Eriococcus spurius (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) by Caitlin Elaine Mader A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Forest Biology and Management Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta © Caitlin Elaine Mader, 2018 Abstract The American elm (Ulmus americana) is a valuable component of urban forests in Alberta. In many Alberta municipalities, the health of these trees is being heavily impacted by the invasive scale insect Eriococcus spurius (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae). Biological control of scales using hymenopteran parasitoids can be an effective replacement or addition to control using chemical insecticides. However, no effective biological control agent has been found for E. spurius. This project investigates the life history and host interactions of Coccophagus gossypariae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid wasp that was discovered parasitizing E. spurius in Calgary. Field studies took place at 46 sites in Calgary during 2015, and 44 of the same sites in 2016. At each site, I conducted repeated-measures sampling every two weeks for eight rounds in 2015, and 5 rounds in 2016. At each site and sampling round, I collected three types of samples: Adult C. gossypariae that had emerged from their hosts and had been caught in mesh traps over the preceding two weeks; first instar E. spurius nymphs that had been caught on sticky traps over the preceding two weeks; and live adult scale insects, which I later dissected in the laboratory for fecundity and parasitism data. I used various combinations of the resulting datasets, along with climate data and urban forest inventory data supplied by the City of Calgary to answer different questions in three investigative chapters. The chapters 2-4 each provide a different area of focus in better understanding this tri-trophic system. In the first chapter, I undertook basic investigations of C. gossypariae life history traits. I found that it is well established throughout Calgary, and accounts for 98% of the parasitism of E. spurius. Parasitism rates varied greatly between sites, ranging from 6.8% to 81.0%. I recorded a sex ratio of 7% males, and a strong avoidance of superparasitism. In the second chapter, I adopted a much broader focus, conducting spatial analyses on how urban landscape factors influence E. spurius populations. I found that the amount of impermeable surfaces within 10 m from a tree, and the number of other elm trees ii upwind of it are both positively associated with higher E. spurius densities. Finally, I examine how E. spurius and C. gossypariae interact over the course of the season, comparing their relative phenologies, and the effects of parasitism on E. spurius reproduction. I found that E. spurius have already finished reproduction before the point in the season when the majority of parasitism-induced mortality occurs. Because E. spurius adults will not live to reproduce again, most mortality induced by C. gossypariae emergence after reproduction will have little impact on its host’s population. However, E. spurius that are parasitized by C. gossypariae produce significantly fewer eggs than those that are not. I conclude that if C. gossypariae has any suppressive effects on its host`s population, it is likely due to fecundity effects, rather than mortality effects. I did not, however, document any influence of C. gossypariae parasitism on changes in E. spurius population. This study provides some first steps for future work on whether C. gossypariae can be used in biological control of E. spurius. iii Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the funding provided by the City of Calgary`s Urban Conservation Unit, the Alberta Conservation Association`s Grants in Biodiversity, and the Anina Hundsdoerfer Memorial Graduate Scholarship. Thanks to Dr. Nadir Erbilgin for the tremendous scientific and logistical support, Jim Watts for supporting this project from the very beginning, Lien Luong and John Acorn for serving as my defense committee, Zhong Li and Todd Kemper for the kind references that got me here and helped with funding, Susan Ryan, John Mader, and Emily Upham-Mills for editing help, my family, Amélie Roberto-Charron, Kelli Luber, Chris Parsonage, Meghan Schech, and Patrick Chan for moral support when it was needed most, the extended Edmonton circus community, Linnea’s Legion, and all of my house- mates for keeping me sane, Daniel Gorham, Pranamika Dutta, April Papequash, and Ashley Pisesky for your care and attention to thousands of incredibly tiny samples, Erik Luber for answering all of my math questions, especially the ones I never ended up using, Jonathan Cale for answering all of my stats and R questions, Evelyn Merrill for guidance in spatial analyses, Violet Zhao, Sanat Kanekar and Jen Klutsch for making the office so enjoyable, and everyone in the Erbilgin lab for their feedback and camaraderie. iv Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1: Thesis Introduction........................................................................................................ 1 Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Life history traits of Coccophagus gossypariae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in field studies ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 8 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................. 13 Sampling scheme .................................................................................................................. 13 Tree selection ........................................................................................................................ 13 Sampling Eriococcus spurius and parasitoid specimens ...................................................... 14 Sample Processing ................................................................................................................ 16 Descriptive statistics ............................................................................................................. 16 Analysis of superparasitism .................................................................................................. 17 Analysis of prolonged effects of imidacloprid on percent parasitism .................................. 17 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Parasitoid emergence rates and species assemblage ............................................................. 18 Coccophagus gossypariae sex ratios .................................................................................... 19 Parasitism and superparasitism rates .................................................................................... 19 Effect of imidacloprid on hymenopteran parasitism ............................................................. 20 Anecdotal field observations................................................................................................. 20 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 21 Parasitoid species assemblage and geographic distributions ................................................ 21 Coccophagus gossypariae sex ratios .................................................................................... 23 Long-term imidacloprid effects on parasitoids ..................................................................... 23 Rates of parasitism and superparasitism ............................................................................... 24 Anecdotal field observations................................................................................................. 26 Future directions ................................................................................................................... 27 Tables and Figures .................................................................................................................... 29 v Chapter 3: Spatial and environmental predictors of ..................................................................... 36 post-insecticide Eriococcus spurius recolonization of urban elm trees ........................................ 36 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 36 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Its Parasitoids from the Genus Coccophagus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), with Description of a New Species from Tamaulipas, México
    Myartseva et al.: Parasitoids of Parasaissetia nigra in Mexico 1015 PARASAISSETIA NIGRA (HEMIPTERA: COCCIDAE) AND ITS PARASITOIDS FROM THE GENUS COCCOPHAGUS (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE), WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM TAMAULIPAS, MÉXICO SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA MYARTSEVA, ENRIQUE RUÍZ-CANCINO AND JUANA MARIA CORONADO-BLANCO* Facultad de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, 87149 Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A list of parasitoids of the genus Coccophagus Westwood that parasitize the soft scale Para- saissetia nigra (Nietner), in the world, is given. Data on the biology of P. nigra in Mexico are presented. A key to species of Coccophagus associated to P. nigra in Mexico, including possible species of parasitoids, was prepared. A new species, Coccophagus minor Myartseva sp. nov., reared from P. nigra on mistletoe, Phoradendron quadrangulare (Kunth) Griseb., growing over leaves and shoots of huisache, Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd., in Tamaulipas, Mexico, is described. Key Words: Phoradendron quadrangulare, mistletoe, Acacia farnesiana; Coccophagus RESUMEN Se elaboró una lista de parasitoides del género Coccophagus Westwood que parasitan la escama blanda Parasaissetia nigra (Nietner) a nivel mundial. Se presentan datos de la biología de P. nigra en México. Se preparó una clave de especies de Coccophagus asociados a P. nigra en México, incluyendo posibles especies parasitoides de la plaga. Se describe la nueva especie Coccophagus minor Myartseva sp. nov., emergida de P. nigra en el muérdago Phoradendron quadrangulare (Kunth) Griseb. sobre hojas y ramitas de huizache Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. en Tamaulipas, México. Palabras Clave: Phoradendron quadrangulare, muérdago, Acacia farnesiana, Coccopha- gus Soft scales of the family Coccidae (Hemip- Parasaissetia nigra is polyphagous, feeding on tera: Coccoidea) are phytophagous insects that host plants from 80 families (Ben-Dov 1993), es- infest leaves, branches and fruits of various pecially on ornamental plants of tropical origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Morocco and Comparison with North Africa Region Fauna 55 Khadija Kissayi, Souâd Benhalima and Moulay Chrif Smaili
    Journal of Entomology and Nematology Volume 9 Number 7, December 2017 ISSN 2006-9855 ABOUT JEN The Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) (ISSN: 2006-9855) is published monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as applications of entomology in solving crimes, taxonomy and control of insects and arachnids, changes in the spectrum of mosquito-borne diseases etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in JEN are peer-reviewed. Contact Us Editorial Office: [email protected] Help Desk: [email protected] Website: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JEN Submit manuscript online http://ms.academicjournals.me/ Associate Editors Editor Dr. Sam Manohar Das Dept. of PG studies and Research Centre in Zoology, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Prof. Mukesh K. Dhillon Nagercoil – 629 003, ICRISAT Kanyakumari District,India GT-Biotechnology, ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, Dr. Leonardo Gomes India UNESP Av. 24A, n 1515, Depto de Biologia, IB, Zip Code: Dr. Lotfalizadeh Hosseinali 13506-900, Department of Insect Taxonomy Rio Claro, SP, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection Brazil. Tehran, P. O. B. 19395-1454, Iran Dr. J. Stanley Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture Prof. Liande Wang Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Almora– Faculty of Plant Protection, 263601, Uttarakhand, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University India Fuzhou, 350002, P.R. China Dr. Ramesh Kumar Jain Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007)
    Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007) John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek (a work in progress) Note: names in parentheses refer to species groups, not subgenera. Encarsia Foerster, 1878. Type species: Encarsia tricolor Foerster, by original designation. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Subsequently designated by ICZN, Opinion 845, 1968: 12-13. Homonym; discovered by ??. Encarsia of the World 2 Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Homonym of Prospalta Howard; discovered by ??. Encarsia; Howard, 1895b. Subsequent description. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name; synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name for Prospalta Howard Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Mimatomus Cockerell, 1911. Type species: Mimatomus peltatus Cockerell, by monotypy. Synonymy by Girault, 1917[312]: 114. Doloresia Mercet, 1912. Type species: Prospaltella filicornis Mercet, by original designation. Synonymy by Mercet, 1930a: 191. Aspidiotiphagus; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltella; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltoides Bréthes, 1914. Type species: Prospaltoides
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperparasitoids As New Targets in Biological Control in a Global Change Context Kévin Tougeron, a Tena
    Hyperparasitoids as new targets in biological control in a global change context Kévin Tougeron, A Tena To cite this version: Kévin Tougeron, A Tena. Hyperparasitoids as new targets in biological control in a global change context. Biological Control, Elsevier, 2019, 130, pp.164-171. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.09.003. hal- 01929186 HAL Id: hal-01929186 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929186 Submitted on 21 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Hyperparasitoids as new targets in biological control in a global change context Authors and affiliations: The authors contributed equally to this work. Tougeron K.1, 2 & Tena A.3 1 The University of Wisconsin – La Crosse, Department of Biology, La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States of America, 1725 State street, 54601 2 Univ Rennes, CNRS, ECOBIO (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution) - UMR 6553, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France.) 3 Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Unidad Asociada de Entomología UJI-IVIA, Moncada, València 46113, Spain. Corresponding author: [email protected] Cite as: Tougeron K. & Tena A. Hyperparasitoids as new targets in biological control in a global change context.
    [Show full text]
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Pest Management APRIL 2019
    biodiversity and pest management APRIL 2019 EIP-AGRI Focus Group ‘Pests and diseases of the olive tree’ Biodiversity and pest management AUTHORS: MARÍA TERESA MARTÍNEZ FERRER, TÂNIA NOBRE, VASILEIOS GKISAKIS, FRANÇOIS WARLOP, JUAN OLIVARES, SUSANA PASCUAL 1 biodiversity and pest management APRIL 2019 1. Introduction Maintaining biodiversity and the associated ecosystem services is an objective of the European Union, implemented through agri-environmental programmes. Biodiversity decline is occurring at a worldwide scale and has twofold implications. From a conservation point of view, the number of extinct and endangered species increases, and this impoverishment of natural ecosystems reduces their resilience. From an agronomical point of view, reduction of biodiversity affects processes that hamper crop productivity, such as pollination or pest management, being the consequence of this biodiversity decline a reduction in agroecosystem sustainability. But both, ecosystem resilience and agro ecosystem sustainability are not isolated. In the case of pest control, in many cases it is assumed that it depends on biodiversity. However, a positive relationship between biodiversity of natural enemies and pest suppression is not always the case. In fact, in some cases this relationship does not occur (Fig.1), and the success of biological control depends not on biodiversity, but on the presence of one or only few species of natural enemies. As an example, in the case of olive trees, a single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis or relatively simple predator assemblages are associated with better biological control than complex assemblages (Paredes et al., 2015). However, it seems that the general rule in different agroecosystems is that biodiversity rather than abundance of natural enemies is linked to pest control, although this has been proven mainly in annual crops and in non- mediterranean environmental conditions (Dainese et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A New Species of Coccophagus from Nuevo Leon
    Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) ISSN: 0065-1737 [email protected] Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México Myartseva, S. N. A new species of Coccophagus from Nuevo Leon, Mexico (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie), vol. 22, núm. 1, 2006, pp. 95-101 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57522107 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 22(1):95-101 (2006) A NEW SPECIES OF COCCOPHAGUS FROM NUEVO LEON, MEXICO (HYMENOPTERA: CHALCIDOIDEA: APHELINIDAE) S. N. MYARTSEVA División de Estudios de Postgrado e Investigación, UAM Agronomía y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, CP 87149, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, MÉXICO e-mail: [email protected] RESUMEN Se describe e ilustra una nueva especie del afelínido Coccophagus gonzalezi sp.nov., con base en especímenes colctados en el estado de Nuevo León, México. Palabras Clave: Coccophagus gonzalezi, nueva especie, Aphelinidae, Coccidae, México. ABSTRACT A new species of aphelinids, from the state of Nuevo León, Mexico, Coccophagus gonzalezi sp.nov., is described and illustrated. Key Words: Coccophagus gonzalezi, new species, Aphelinidae, Coccidae, Mexico. INTRODUCTION The genus Coccophagus Westwood, 1833, includes more than 200 described species and it is one of the largest genera in Aphelinidae. Its distribution is cosmopolitan. The first regional revision of Coccophagus was published in Australia (Girault 1915). Later Coccophagus species in the Ethiopian region (Annecke & Insley 1974), China (Huang 1994) and India (Hayat 1998) were revised.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmyra Atoll
    Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Biosecurity Plan for Palmyra Atoll Open-File Report 2010–1097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Images showing ants, scale, black rats, and coconut trees found at Palmyra Atoll. (Photographs by Stacie Hathaway, U.S. Geological Survey, 2008.) Biosecurity Plan for Palmyra Atoll By Stacie A. Hathaway and Robert N. Fisher Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Open-File Report 2010–1097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Hathaway, S.A., and Fisher, R.N., 2010, Biosecurity plan for Palmyra Atoll: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1097, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Natural Enemies of Pseudococcidae in the Semiarid Region of Brazil
    Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 12, No. 7; 2020 ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Biodiversity of Natural Enemies of Pseudococcidae in the Semiarid Region of Brazil Maria G. R. Sá1, José E. M. Oliveira2, Valmir A. Costa3 & Paulo R. C. Lopes2 1 Agricultural Sciences Campus, Federal University of São Francisco Valley, Petrolina, Pernambuco State, Brazil 2 Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina State, Brazil 3 Biological Institute, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence: Maria G. R. Sá, Agricultural Sciences Campus, Federal University of São Francisco Valley, Highway BR 407, 12 Lot 543, Nilo Coelho Irrigation Project, S/N C1, Petrolina, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Tel: 55-87-99618-4185. E-mail: [email protected] Received: February 10, 2020 Accepted: May 4, 2020 Online Published: June 15, 2020 doi:10.5539/jas.v12n7p24 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n7p24 Abstract Pseudococcidae species, also known as mealybugs, comprises a complex of pests in various cultivated and non-cultivated plant species, among which fruit plants are most affected by both direct and indirect damage. The incidence of these pest species has been constant in productive environments, causing significant losses due to sap suction, virus transmission, and damage to fruit quality. Thus, this study aimed to know and investigate the population dynamics of natural enemies of Pseudococcidae in different fruit plants cultivated in the semiarid region of Brazil. For this, mealybugs associated with roots, stems, leaves, and fruits of vine, pear, apple, persimmon, guava, and acerola trees were collected biweekly in 14 properties in the São Francisco Valley region, from July 2016 to June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Coccids (Hemiptera: Coccidae: Coccus
    Zootaxa 4521 (1): 001–051 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4521.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D2096E74-49D8-4235-B26C-2C97170DBDC7 Taxonomy of coccids (Hemiptera: Coccidae: Coccus L.) associated with Crematogaster ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the stems of Macaranga plants (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia PENNY J. GULLAN1, TAKUMASA KONDO2, BRIGITTE FIALA3 & SWEE-PECK QUEK4 1Division of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, College of Science, The Australian National University, Acton, Can- berra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia), Centro de Investigación Palmira, Calle 23, Carrera 37 Con- tinuo al Penal, Palmira, Valle, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. E- mail:[email protected] 4Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Table of content Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Materials and methods . 4 Taxonomy . 8 Coccus Linnaeus . 8 Diagnosis for Coccus species associated with Macaranga. 9 Key to adult females of Coccus species associated with Macaranga . 12 Coccus caviramicolus Morrison . 13 Coccus circularis Morrison. 14 Coccus heckrothi Gullan & Kondo sp. n. 18 Coccus lambirensis Gullan & Kondo sp. n. 20 Coccus macarangae Morrison . 22 Coccus macarangicolus Takahashi . 25 Coccus penangensis Morrison . 30 Coccus pseudotumuliferus Gullan & Kondo sp. n. 34 Coccus secretus Morrison . 39 Coccus tumuliferus Morrison .
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of Armored Scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and Soft Scales (Hemiptera
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/429357; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Natural enemies of armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and soft scales (Hemiptera: 2 Coccoidae) in Chile: molecular and morphological identification 3 4 Amouroux, P.1*; Crochard, D.2; Correa, M.C.G. 2,3; Groussier, G. 2; Kreiter, P. 2; Roman, C.4; 5 Guerrieri, E.5,6; Garonna, A.P.7; Malausa, T. 2 & Zaviezo, T1. 6 7 1 Departamento de Fruticultura y Enología, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, 8 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 9 2 Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, France. 10 3 Centre for Molecular and Functional Ecology in Agroecosystems, Universidad de Talca, Talca, 11 Chile 12 4 Xilema-ANASAC Control Biológico, San Pedro, Quillota, Chile. 13 5 Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Portici 14 (NA), Italy 15 6 Department of Life Sciences, the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 16 7 Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Portici (NA), Italy. 17 18 * Corresponding author e-mail: 19 [email protected] (AP) 20 [email protected] (EG) 21 22 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/429357; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]