DOCSLIB.ORG

Palmyra Atoll

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palmyra Atoll Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Biosecurity Plan for Palmyra Atoll Open-File Report 2010–1097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Images showing ants, scale, black rats, and coconut trees found at Palmyra Atoll. (Photographs by Stacie Hathaway, U.S. Geological Survey, 2008.) Biosecurity Plan for Palmyra Atoll By Stacie A. Hathaway and Robert N. Fisher Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Open-File Report 2010–1097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Hathaway, S.A., and Fisher, R.N., 2010, Biosecurity plan for Palmyra Atoll: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1097, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Study Site ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Terrestrial Non-Native or Invasive Species at Palmyra Atoll....................................................................................... 5 Non-Native or Invasive Vascular Plants.................................................................................................................. 5 Non-Native Animals ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Marine Non-Native or Invasive Species...................................................................................................................... 8 Existing Non-Native Species Laws, Policies, Protocols .............................................................................................. 9 International ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 National................................................................................................................................................................... 9 State of Hawai`i..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Palmyra Atoll......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Goals and Objectives of the Biosecurity Plan for Palmyra Atoll................................................................................ 12 Goal (G1) Reinstate Ecosystem Security.............................................................................................................. 12 Goal (G2) Evaluate New Risk Factors .................................................................................................................. 12 Scope and Limitations of this Biosecurity Plan...................................................................................................... 12 Palmyra Atoll Biosecurity Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .................................................................................... 13 Goal (G1) Reinstate Ecosystem Security.............................................................................................................. 13 Desired Future Conditions................................................................................................................................. 13 Goal (G1) Objectives............................................................................................................................................. 13 (G1-O1) Prevention ........................................................................................................................................... 13 (G1-O2) Early Detection.................................................................................................................................... 15 (G1-O3) Eradicate Incipient Invasive Species................................................................................................... 17 (G1-O4) Eradicate or Control the Spread of Established Non-Native and (or) Invasive Species....................... 18 (G1-O5) Support, Promote, and Coordinate Research and Monitoring that Increases the Understanding of Non-Native and Invasive Species at Palmyra Atoll and Improves Non-Native Species Management Decision Making............................................................................................................................................................... 19 (G1-O6) Educate to Ensure Awareness of Threats and Protocols ....................................................................19 Goal (G2) Monitor New Risk Factors—Develop Ongoing Assessment................................................................. 20 Desired Future Conditions................................................................................................................................. 20 Goal (G2) Objectives............................................................................................................................................. 20 (G2-O1) Adaptive Management Audit and Review............................................................................................ 20 (G2-O2) Identify Priority Risks........................................................................................................................... 21 (G2-O3) Develop Offsite Controls. .................................................................................................................... 22 Potential Workplan.................................................................................................................................................... 25 Phase 1................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Phase 2................................................................................................................................................................. 26 References Cited...................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix 1. Potential Non-Native Species Introduction Pathways Relevant to Palmyra Atoll ................................. 41 Appendix 2. Special Conditions and Rules for Visiting and Departing Palmyra Atoll and Moving Intra-Atoll ............ 42 Appendix 3. Additional Special Conditions for Food Provisions Destined for Palmyra Atoll..................................... 46 Appendix 4. Conditions and Rules for Air Transport to Palmyra Atoll ....................................................................... 47 iii Contents—Continued Appendix 5. Conditions and Rules for Shipping Vessels, Containers, and Other Cargo Destined for Palmyra Atoll.............................................................................................................................. 49 Appendix 6. Disinfection Standards for Used Vehicle, Machinery, and Equipment Destined for Palmyra Atoll ........ 54 Appendix 7. Disinfection Protocol for Boats and Trailers Destined for Palmyra Atoll................................................ 57 Appendix 8. Hawai`i Department of Land and Natural Resources, Adoption of Chapter 13–76, Hawai`i Administrative Rules, “Non-Indigenous Aquatic Species”......................................................................................... 60 Appendix 9. Disinfection of Scientific/Recreational Equipment, Dive Gear, and Subsistence or Other Fishing Gear for Prevention of Disease and Introduced Species.............................................................................. 76 Appendix 10. Draft of Communications Strategy Components for Awareness of Non-Native/Invasive Species at Palmyra Atoll........................................................................................................................................... 79 Figure Figure 1. Map of Palmyra Atoll................................................................................................................................ 30 Tables Table 1. Experts consulted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous
    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera, Phoridae) from Iran
    Archive of SID J Insect Biodivers Syst 04(3): 147–155 ISSN: 2423-8112 JOURNAL OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS Research Article http://jibs.modares.ac.ir http://zoobank.org/References/578CCEF1-37B7-45D3-9696-82B159F75BEB New records of the scuttle flies (Diptera, Phoridae) from Iran Roya Namaki Khameneh1, Samad Khaghaninia1*, R. Henry L. Disney2 1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, I.R. Iran. 2 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, U.K. ABSTRACT. The faunistic study of the family Phoridae carried out in northwestern of Iran during 2013–2017. Five species (Conicera tibialis Schmitz, Received: 1925, Dohrniphora cornuta (Bigot, 1857), Gymnophora arcuata (Meigen, 1830), 06 August, 2018 Metopina oligoneura (Mik, 1867) and Triphleba intermedia (Malloch, 1908)) are newly recorded from Iran. The genera Conicera Meigen, 1830, Dohrniphora Accepted: 14 November, 2018 Dahl, 1898, Gymnophora Macquart, 1835 and Triphleba Rondani, 1856 are reported for the first time from the country. Diagnostic characters of the Published: studied species along with their photographs are provided. 20 November, 2018 Subject Editor: Key words: Phoridae, Conicera, Dohrniphora, Gymnophora, Triphleba, Iran, New Farzaneh Kazerani records Citation: Namaki khameneh, R., Khaghaninia, S. & Disney, R.H.L. (2018) New records of the scuttle flies (Diptera, Phoridae) from Iran. Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 4 (3), 147–155. Introduction Phoridae with about 4,000 identified insect eggs, larvae, and pupae. The adults species in more than 260 genera, is usually feed on nectar, honeydew and the considered as one of the largest families of exudates of fresh carrion and dung, Diptera (Ament & Brown, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
    [Show full text]
  • False Black Widows and Other Household Spiders
    False Black Widows and Other Household Spiders Spiders can quite unnecessarily evoke all kinds of dread and fear. The Press does not help by publishing inaccurate and often alarmist stories about them. Spiders are in fact one of our very important beneficial creatures. Spiders in the UK devour a weight of insect 'pests' equivalent to that of the nation's human population! During the mid-late summer, many spiders mature and as a result become more obvious as they have then grown to their full size. One of these species is Steatoda nobilis. It came from the Canary and Madeiran Islands into Devon over a 100 years ago, being first recorded in Britain near Torquay in 1879! However it was not described from Britain until 1993, when it was known to have occurred since at least 1986 and 1989 as flourishing populations in Portsmouth (Hampshire) and Swanage (Dorset). There was also a population in Westcliff-on-Sea (Essex) recorded in 1990, and another in Littlehampton and Worthing (West Sussex). Its distribution is spreading more widely along the coast in the south and also inland, with confirmed records from South Devon, East Sussex, Kent, Surrey and Warwick. The large, grape-like individuals are the females and the smaller, more elongate ones, the males. These spiders are have become known as False Widows and, because of their colour, shape and size, are frequently mistaken for the Black Widow Spider that are found in warmer climes, but not in Britain (although some occasionally come into the country in packaged fruit and flowers). Black Widow Spiders belong to the world-wide genus Latrodectus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behavioural Ecology of Latrodectus Hasselti (Thorell), the Australian Redback Spider (Araneae: Theridiidae): a Review
    Records of the Western Australian MIISellnl Supplement No. 52: 13-24 (1995). The behavioural ecology of Latrodectus hasselti (Thorell), the Australian Redback Spider (Araneae: Theridiidae): a review Lyn Forster McMasters Road, RD 1, Saddle Hill, Dunedin, New Zealand Abstract - Aspects of the biogeographical history and behavioural ecology of the AustralIan Latrodectus hasseIti provide support for the endemic status of this species. Cannibalism, prey stealing and short instar lengths are growth strategies for. female spiders whereas early maturation, small size, hiding and scavengmg are useful survival tactics for males. Moreover male complicity is an important component of sexual cannibalism which is ~hown to be a highly predictable event. Latrodectus hasseIti males hybridize with female L. katlpo (a New Zealand species) and fertile Fl and F2 generations Imply genetic relatedness. Hence, it is likely that L. hasselti and L. katipo evolv~d from a common ancestor in ancient Pangaea, a feasible explanation only If L. hasseItl IS endemic to Australia. It is concluded that L. hasseIti would have been able to persist in outback Australia for millions of years, with ItS mtraspeClfJc predatory habits aiding subsistence and the evolution of sexual cannibalism providing a way of coping with infrequent meeting and matmg opportunities. INTRODUCTION indigenous status, Main (1993) notes that, (as a Many stories and articles have been written consequence of its supposed introduction), "the about the redback spider (McKeown 1963; Raven absence of Latrodectus in the Australian region, 1992) with considerable attention being devoted to prior to human habitation, poses a curious its venomous nature (Southcott 1978; Sutherland zoogeographic dilemma". This comment raises an and Trinca 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hym.: Eulophidae) New Larval Ectoparasitoids of Tuta Absoluta (Meyreck) (Lep.: Gelechidae)
    J. Crop Prot. 2016, 5 (3): 413-418______________________________________________________ Research Article Two species of the genus Elachertus Spinola (Hym.: Eulophidae) new larval ectoparasitoids of Tuta absoluta (Meyreck) (Lep.: Gelechidae) Fatemeh Yarahmadi1*, Zohreh Salehi1 and Hossein Lotfalizadeh2 1. Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran. 2. East-Azarbaijan Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tabriz, Iran. Abstract: This is the first report of two ectoparasitoid wasps, Elachertus inunctus (Nees, 1834) in Iran and Elachertus pulcher (Erdös, 1961) (Hym.: Eulophidae) in the world, that parasitize larvae of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lep.: Gelechiidae). The specimens were collected from tomato fields and greenhouses in Ahwaz, Khouzestan province (south west of Iran). Both species are new records for fauna of Iran. The knowledge about these parasitoids is still scanty. The potential of these parasitoids for biological control of T. absoluta in tomato fields and greenhouses should be investigated. Keywords: tomato leaf miner, parasitoids, identification, biological control Introduction12 holometabolous insects, the overall range of hosts and biologies in eulophid wasps is remarkably The Eulophidae is one of the largest families of diverse (Gauthier et al., 2000). Chalcidoidea. The chalcid parasitoid wasps attack Species of the genus Elachertus Spinola, 1811 insects from many orders and also mites. Many (Hym.: Eulophidae) are primary parasitoids of a eulophid wasps parasitize several pests on variety of lepidopteran larvae. Some species are different crops. They can regulate their host's polyphagous that parasite hosts belonging to populations in natural conditions (Yefremova and different insect families. The larvae of these Myartseva, 2004). Eulophidae are composed of wasps are often gregarious and their pupae can be four subfamilies, Entedoninae (Förster, 1856), observed on the surface of plant leaves or the Euderinae (Lacordaire, 1866), Eulophinae body of their host.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mercet, 1924) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in the Middle East
    J. Crop Prot. 2016, 5 (2): 307-311______________________________________________________ doi: 10.18869/modares.jcp.5.2.307 Short Paper First record of Hemiptarsenus autonomus (Mercet, 1924) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in the Middle East Amir-Reza Piruznia1, Hossein Lotfalizadeh2* and Mohammad-Reza Zargaran3 1. Department of Plant Protection, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of Plant Protection, East-Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Tabriz, Iran. 3. Department of Forestry, Natural Resource Faculty, University of Urmia, Urmia, Iran. Abstract: Hemiptarsenus autonomus (Mercet, 1924) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae, Eulophinae) was found for the first time outside of Europe. Studied specimen was collected by a Malaise trap in the north west of Iran, East-Azarbaijan province, Khajeh (46°38'E & 38°09'N). Current record of Hemiptarsenus species of Iran adds up to seven species. These species and their geographical distribution in Iran are listed. Keywords: Chalcidoidea, new distribution, record, Iran, fauna Introduction12 Materials and Methods Eulophidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Iran Samplings were made in using the Malaise trap has been listed by Hesami et al. (2010) and Talebi in East-Azarbaijan province, Khajeh, Iran during et al. (2011). They listed 122 eulophid species summer of 2015. All the materials were from different parts of Iran including three species subsequently transferred to the laboratory at of the genus Hemiptarsenus Westwood, 1833 Department of Plant Protection, East-Azarbaijan (Hesami et al., 2010; Talebi et al., 2011). Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Recently Lotfalizadeh et al. (2015) reported Resources, Tabriz. External morphology was Hemiptarsenus waterhousii Westwood, 1833 as a illustrated using an Olympus™ SZH, equipped parasitoid of alfalfa leaf miners in the northwest with a Canon™ A720 digital camera.
    [Show full text]
  • B: Other U.S. Island Possessions in the Tropical Pacific
    Appendix B Other U.S. Island Possessions in the Tropical Pacific1 Introduction Howland, Jarvis, and Baker Islands There are eight isolated and unincorporated is- Howland, Jarvis and Baker are arid coral islands lands and reefs under U.S. control and sovereignty in the southern Line Island group (figure B-l). Aside in the tropical Pacific Basin. Included in this cate- from American Samoa, Jarvis Island is the only gory are: Kingman Reef, Palmyra and Johnston other U.S.-affiliated island in the Southern Hemi- Atolls in the northern Line Island group; Howland, sphere. These islands lie within one-half degree Baker and Jarvis Islands in the southern Line Is- from the equator, in the equatorial climatic zone. land group; Midway Atoll at the northwest end of During the 19th century the United States and the Hawaiian archipelago; and Wake Island north Britain actively exploited the significant guano de- of the Marshall Islands. Evidence indicates that posits found on these three islands. Jarvis Island some of these islands were not inhabited prior to was claimed by the United States in 1857, and sub- “Western” discovery; and today some remain unin- sequently annexed by Britain in 1889. Jarvis, Howland, habited. and Baker Islands were made territories of the These islands range from less than 1 degree south United States in 1936, and placed under the juris- latitude to nearly 29 degrees north latitude and from diction of the Department of the Interior. The is- 162 degrees west to 167 east longitude. The climate lands currently are uninhabited. regimes range from arid to wet and equatorial to These atolls were used as weather stations and subtropical.
    [Show full text]
  • And Its Parasitoids from the Genus Coccophagus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), with Description of a New Species from Tamaulipas, México
    Myartseva et al.: Parasitoids of Parasaissetia nigra in Mexico 1015 PARASAISSETIA NIGRA (HEMIPTERA: COCCIDAE) AND ITS PARASITOIDS FROM THE GENUS COCCOPHAGUS (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE), WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM TAMAULIPAS, MÉXICO SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA MYARTSEVA, ENRIQUE RUÍZ-CANCINO AND JUANA MARIA CORONADO-BLANCO* Facultad de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, 87149 Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A list of parasitoids of the genus Coccophagus Westwood that parasitize the soft scale Para- saissetia nigra (Nietner), in the world, is given. Data on the biology of P. nigra in Mexico are presented. A key to species of Coccophagus associated to P. nigra in Mexico, including possible species of parasitoids, was prepared. A new species, Coccophagus minor Myartseva sp. nov., reared from P. nigra on mistletoe, Phoradendron quadrangulare (Kunth) Griseb., growing over leaves and shoots of huisache, Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd., in Tamaulipas, Mexico, is described. Key Words: Phoradendron quadrangulare, mistletoe, Acacia farnesiana; Coccophagus RESUMEN Se elaboró una lista de parasitoides del género Coccophagus Westwood que parasitan la escama blanda Parasaissetia nigra (Nietner) a nivel mundial. Se presentan datos de la biología de P. nigra en México. Se preparó una clave de especies de Coccophagus asociados a P. nigra en México, incluyendo posibles especies parasitoides de la plaga. Se describe la nueva especie Coccophagus minor Myartseva sp. nov., emergida de P. nigra en el muérdago Phoradendron quadrangulare (Kunth) Griseb. sobre hojas y ramitas de huizache Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. en Tamaulipas, México. Palabras Clave: Phoradendron quadrangulare, muérdago, Acacia farnesiana, Coccopha- gus Soft scales of the family Coccidae (Hemip- Parasaissetia nigra is polyphagous, feeding on tera: Coccoidea) are phytophagous insects that host plants from 80 families (Ben-Dov 1993), es- infest leaves, branches and fruits of various pecially on ornamental plants of tropical origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0028 Autor(en)/Author(s): Yefremova Zoya A., Ebrahimi Ebrahim, Yegorenkova Ekaterina Artikel/Article: The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 28, Heft 25: 321-356 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 30. November 2007 The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Zoya YEFREMOVA, Ebrahim EBRAHIMI & Ekaterina YEGORENKOVA Abstract This paper reflects the current degree of research of Eulophidae and their hosts in Iran. A list of the species from Iran belonging to the subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae is presented. In the present work 47 species from 22 genera are recorded from Iran. Two species (Cirrospilus scapus sp. nov. and Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) are described as new. A list of 45 host-parasitoid associations in Iran and keys to Iranian species of three genera (Cirrospilus, Diglyphus and Aprostocetus) are included. Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel zeigt den derzeitigen Untersuchungsstand an eulophiden Wespen und ihrer Wirte im Iran. Eine Liste der für den Iran festgestellten Arten der Unterfamilien Eu- lophinae, Entedoninae und Tetrastichinae wird präsentiert. Mit vorliegender Arbeit werden 47 Arten in 22 Gattungen aus dem Iran nachgewiesen. Zwei neue Arten (Cirrospilus sca- pus sp. nov. und Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) werden beschrieben. Eine Liste von 45 Wirts- und Parasitoid-Beziehungen im Iran und ein Schlüssel für 3 Gattungen (Cirro- spilus, Diglyphus und Aprostocetus) sind in der Arbeit enthalten.
    [Show full text]