DOCSLIB.ORG

Norfolk Rivers Trust Partnership River Stiffkey Total Catchment Solution Balancing Nutrients

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norfolk Rivers Trust Partnership River Stiffkey Total Catchment Solution Balancing Nutrients Norfolk Rivers Trust Partnership River Stiffkey Total Catchment Solution Balancing Nutrients 1 Mission Statement: Norfolk Rivers Trust’s mission is to enhance the value of the aquatic landscape through encouraging natural processes, with benefits for wildlife and people. Funding for this project • Environment Agency 4 Years • Natural England • World Wildlife Fund • Tesco, Asda, J Sainsbury,Courtauld 2025 • Utility Companies • Land Owners • Local Funders – Wind – Solar - Other Phases of the Project • Phase 1 Current – Walk Overs – Farm Visits – Establish nutrient inflows and Create total Catchment Partnership Plan • Phase 1 a Deliver plan to local community and partners • Phase 2 Establish Additional Funding – Permissions – Permits and Water planning • Phase 3 Deliver improvement • Phase 4 Measure against set Catchment Water Quality Objectives 4 Examples of Silt Trap Interventions Integrated Constructed Wetlands Options Forest and Industrial (food ponds processing) intercepting Flood attenuation wastewater land drainage and treatment treatment Water management through the coherent reanimation of ‘integrated’ constructed wetland types In situ Recreational treatment of Municipal wastewater self cleansing landfill leachate treatment swimming pond Impact Nar silt traps and LWD 350 300 250 Lexham 200 Castle 150 Acre Manor 100 Farm 50 0 2010 2013 2015 Fish numbers on Nar: EA Electro-fishing data 2015 EA Stiffkey Map 8 WATER QUALITY IN THE STIFFKEY AND GLAVEN CATCHMENTS AND BLAKENEY HARBOUR Estuaries and Coasts Partnership Fund Project Summary ABOUT THE PROJECT WE DID NOT FIND EVIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS POSED TO THE ESTUARY FROM THE STIFFKEY AND GLAVEN CATCHMENTS Blakeney Harbour (Norfolk) offers excellent opportunities for Why do we think this? fishing, sailing and bathing and functions as a nursery and feeding ground for many species of birds, finfish and shellfish. FAECAL INDICATOR BACTERIA NUTRIENTS In 2015, the Stiffkey & Glaven transitional waters was given a “bad” classification on the basis of biological criteria § On average, bacterial loadings from sewage § The water samples had low concentrations of nutrients. (phytoplankton) under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). treatment works (STW) in the upper catchment are, The River Glaven was given “moderate” classification under on average, 100 times higher than the loadings from § The sites with higher levels of phosphates were: Binham WFD. STW in the lower catchment. Tributary, Stiffkey Bridge, Wighton Bridge (River Stiffkey) and Wiveton Bridge (River Glaven). We carried out an investigation in the Stiffkey & Glaven § Bacterial loadings from the River Stiffkey are, on catchments and in Blakeney Harbour to better understand the average, 10 times higher than the loadings from the § The ratio of nitrate:phosphate was higher in April– causes of these classifications and the sources of faecal River Glaven. September indicating greater mobilisation of nutrients in indicator bacteria (FIB) (E. coli), nutrients and phytoplankton. the growing season. § In the harbour, mean levels of E. coli in seawater WATER QUALITY INVESTIGATIONS were low (<10 cfu/100ml) at sites in the main harbour § At marine sites, the levels of dissolved inorganic channel. nitrogen decreased as salinity increased and were We collected water samples at 4 freshwater sites and at 7 characteristic of waters of “moderate” quality under marine sites during the period November 2016–September 2017 § Wildlife (seals, birds) contribute higher levels of E. WFD. during dry and wet-weather. Water samples were analysed for: coli to the harbour than river dischargesPHYTOPLANKTON. § Escherichia coli § Species of Alexandrium and Dinophysis were not found in any of the water samples. § Nutrients (nitrogen, nitrite, phosphate, silicate, ammonium) Most species of § Chlorophyll-a phytoplankton identified, § Karenia mikimotoi was found in two samples at low concentrations (100 cells/l). The such as Asterionellopsis § Suspended particulate matter highest concentration of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. was 140,910 cells/l. glacialis, were typically § Phytoplankton marine and harmless. We also measured salinity, temperature, phaeopigments, PROPOSED MEASURES TO ACHIEVE “GOOD” STATUS OF THE WATERS UNDER THE WFD fluorescence, turbidity, oxygen, salinity, temperature and photosynthetically active radiation at the water sampling sites. Farmers should apply fertilisers taking into account Water company could consider installing The investigation also included a re-analysis of historical WFD soil reserves and organic manure supply as advanced forms of treatment at Holt STW and monitoring data available for the study catchments. recommended by best practice Great Walsingham STW Maintenance of “good” status of the waters Escherichia coli are faecal is important to support a healthy bacteria used indicate Farmers should spread fertilisers and manures in Owners of septic tanks/small package sewage environment and protect human health contamination of human and low risk areas and at low risk times, avoiding treatment plants must ensure that tanks animal origins periods of rainfall perform well and do not contaminate surface waters Farmers should keep livestock away from Boat owners should adopt the watercourses through streambank fencing or recommendations of the RYA/British Marine bridging of streams Federation Love where you sail campaign WFD EA website – compare with CEFAS 2009 2016 OBJECTIVE Overall POOR Moderate GOOD by 2027 Eco POOR MODERATE GOOD by 2027 CHEMICAL NRA GOOD Protected Areas Nitrate NN SAC 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • River Glaven State of the Environment Report
    The River Glaven A State of the Environment Report ©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative ©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence © Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this C reative ©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence Produced by Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Spring 201 4 i Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (NBIS) is a Local Record Centre holding information on species, GEODIVERSITY , habitats and protected sites for the county of Norfolk. For more information see our website: www.nbis.org.uk This report is available for download from the NBIS website www.nbis.org.uk Report written by Lizzy Oddy, March 2014. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following people for their help and input into this report: Mark Andrews (Environment Agency); Anj Beckham (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Andrew Cannon (Natural Surroundings); Claire Humphries (Environment Agency); Tim Jacklin (Wild Trout Trust); Kelly Powell (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Carl Sayer (University College London); Ian Shepherd (River Glaven Conservation Group); Mike Sutton-Croft (Norfolk Non-native Species Initiative); Jonah Tosney (Norfolk Rivers Trust) Cover Photos Clockwise from top left: Wiveton Bridge (©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Glandford Ford (©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); River Glaven above Glandford (©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Swan at Glandford Ford (© Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence). ii CONTENTS Foreword – Gemma Clark, 9 Chalk Rivers Project Community Involvement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLAVEN HISTORIAN the Journal of the Blakeney Area Historical Society
    THE GLAVEN HISTORIAN The Journal of the Blakeney Area Historical Society Issue No. 1 June 1998 CONTENTS Editorial 2 Jonathan Hooton 1586 Map of Blakeney Haven and Port of Cley: Part I 3 Mary Ferroussat Norfolk War Memorials Project 1918-1998 8 Jean George The Reverend James Pointer: Rector of Blakeney (1584-1621) and Wiveton (1591-1621) 15 Monica White Taylor’s Wood 20 Richard Kelham The Blakeney and Cley Port Books 22 The editor Sounds familiar ..... but what does it mean? 27 Peter Carnell & John Wright Bayfield Church: Resistivity Survey 1998 30 The editor What the papers said 43 John Wright Domesday Blakeney 46 1 EDITORIAL Dear Founder Members, welcome to the first issue of our new Journal! This first issue is bound to be somewhat experimental in both content and format, for the Journal can and should evolve according to the needs of the Society. ‘Journal’ sounds a rather grand title for a relatively small Society to adopt but it is the term often used to distinguish a permanent record of articles from the more ephemeral contents of a Newsletter. The Journal will be annual and its principal function will be to further the objectives of the Society. These are set out in the constitution and in summary are: • to study the local history of this area • to publish the results. The Journal can therefore carry a wide range of topics covering all periods. The most important point to make is that the contents must be contributed by members. The editor will supply some material but is not going to fill each issue – no contributions, no Journal! Local history is not confined to the distant past, even yesterday is now history and the sooner changes are recorded the better, before the evidence is lost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cromer Moraine
    THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro­ nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama­ tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaven Historian
    the GLAVEN HISTORIAN No 16 2018 Editorial 2 Diana Cooke, John Darby: Land Surveyor in East Anglia in the late Sixteenth 3 Jonathan Hooton Century Nichola Harrison Adrian Marsden Seventeenth Century Tokens at Cley 11 John Wright North Norfolk from the Sea: Marine Charts before 1700 23 Jonathan Hooton William Allen: Weybourne ship owner 45 Serica East The Billyboy Ketch Bluejacket 54 Eric Hotblack The Charities of Christopher Ringer 57 Contributors 60 2 The Glaven Historian No.16 Editorial his issue of the Glaven Historian contains eight haven; Jonathan Hooton looks at the career of William papers and again demonstrates the wide range of Allen, a shipowner from Weybourne in the 19th cen- Tresearch undertaken by members of the Society tury, while Serica East has pulled together some his- and others. toric photographs of the Billyboy ketch Bluejacket, one In three linked articles, Diana Cooke, Jonathan of the last vessels to trade out of Blakeney harbour. Hooton and Nichola Harrison look at the work of John Lastly, Eric Hotblack looks at the charities established Darby, the pioneering Elizabethan land surveyor who by Christopher Ringer, who died in 1678, in several drew the 1586 map of Blakeney harbour, including parishes in the area. a discussion of how accurate his map was and an The next issue of Glaven Historian is planned for examination of the other maps produced by Darby. 2020. If anyone is considering contributing an article, Adrian Marsden discusses the Cley tradesmen who is- please contact the joint editor, Roger Bland sued tokens in the 1650s and 1660s, part of a larger ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Highfield House| Norfolk
    GROUND FLOOR APPROX. FLOOR AREA 1922 SQ.FT. (178.5 SQ.M.) TOTAL APPROX. FLOOR AREA: 4100 SQ.FT. (380.8 SQ.M.) EXCLUDES VOID. HIGHFIELD HOUSE | NORFOLK Whilst every attempt has been A unique detached period residence situated in an idyllic location made to ensure the accuracy of the floor plan contained here, measurements of doors, windows GUIDE PRICE £1,250,000 and rooms are approximate and no responsibility is taken for any error, omission or misstatement. These plans are for representation purposes only and should be used a such by any prospective purchaser. The services, systems and appliances shown have not been tested and no guarantee as to their operability or efficiency can be given. Made with Metropix c 2017 GENERAL REMARKS LOCATION DIRECTIONS HIGHFIELD HOUSE, LOWER BODHAM, AND STIPULATIONS Highfield House is situated in the quiet hamlet of Lower Bodham, an attractive rural location with rolling open coun- NORFOLK, NR25 6RN Intending purchasers will be asked to produce original Identity tryside, mixed woodland and the picturesque fishing lake, Selbrigg Pond, nearby. There is a footpath leading south- Documentation and Proof of Address before solicitors are instructed. wards to Hempstead and Baconsthorpe and another leading northwards through Bodham Common and Hundred Leave Holt on the A148 towards High Kelling and Acre Wood around High Kelling to Kelling Heath. Here, the headwaters of the river Glaven run through undulating Sheringham. On entering High Kelling turn right arable and wooded countryside in a tranquil backwater that is only a short drive from Holt. on to Selbrigg Road, signposted Lower Bodham.
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk Custom & Self Build Housing Register Part 1
    North Norfolk Custom & Self Build Housing Register Part 1 Registrations during the period: 31 October 2019 to 30 October 2020 Ref Date Type of Build Serviced Plots Size of Plot Preferred Preferred Location Date of Entry Application Required Received CSB 25127* 24/10/2019 Individual 1 0.50h - 0.75 (ha) Broads 31/10/2019 CSB 196765* 07/10/2019 Individual 1 Unknown Any location 31/10/2019 Little Walsingham, Great CSB 82579* 08/10/2019 Individual 1 Less than 0.25 (ha) Walsingham, Great Snoring, 31/10/2019 Wighton, North Barsham, Egmere CSB 13533* 09/10/2019 Individual 1 Less than 1 (ha) Cromer, Sheringham 31/10/2019 CSB 23587* 18/10/2019 Individual 1 Less than 0.25 (ha) Holt, Sheringham 31/10/2019 Holt, Langham, Blakeney, Morston, Cley-Next-The-Sea, Kelling, CSB 12207* 21/10/2019 Individual 1 0.5 (ha) Salthouse, Weybourne, Beeston 31/10/2019 Regis, Sheringham, Stiffkey, North Norfolk Coast. Wells, Morston, Stiffkey, Wiveton, CSB 21661* 22/10/2019 Individual 1 Unknown 31/10/2019 Cley CSB 10299* 05/11/2019 Individual 1 Unknown Salthouse 05/11/2019 CSB 18499* 05/11/2019 Individual 1 0.25h - 0.50h Any location 05/11/2019 Ref Date Type of Build Serviced Plots Size of Plot Preferred Preferred Location Date of Entry Application Required Received Overstrand, Northrepps, Mundesley, Sidestrand, Southrepps, CSB 323411 17/01/2020 Individual 1 Less than 0.25 (ha) 23/01/2020 Thorpe Market, Cromer, Roughton, Felbrigg Sheringham, Gresham, Holt, CSB 414749 18/06/2020 Individual 1 Less than 0.25 (ha) Saxthorpe, Corpusty, Baconsthorpe, 02/07/2020 Matlsake, Bessingham, Aldborough Warham, Wells next the Sea, Stiffkey, Morston, Castle Acre, CSB 426833 30/06/2020 Individual 1 Less than 0.25 (ha) 09/07/2020 Walsingham, Wighton, Binham, Langham and surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Maker
    Descendants of Henry High 1 Henry High b: Abt. 1745 . +Elizabeth Fill m: 06 Aug 1764 in Briston .... 2 Benjamin High b: 09 Sep 1764 in Briston d: 12 Nov 1848 in Cley next the Sea ........ +Mary Wilkinson b: 1769 m: 29 Dec 1791 in Booton d: 19 Apr 1829 in Cley next the Sea ........... 3 Benjamin High b: 29 Apr 1792 in Booton d: Abt. Jun 1879 in Walsingham District ............... +Mary Josh b: Abt. 1792 in Mattishall d: Abt. Dec 1880 in Walsingham District .................. 4 Benjamin High b: 03 Feb 1817 in Glandford d: Bef. 1841 .................. 4 Henry High b: 01 Apr 1818 in Glandford d: 05 Nov 1886 in Wood Norton ..................... +Mary Ann Pitcher b: Abt. 1824 in Weybourne m: Abt. Jun 1845 in Walsingham District ........................ 5 Benjamin High b: 07 Sep 1845 in Weybourne d: 28 Jul 1851 in Wiveton ........................ 5 Mary Elizabeth High b: Abt. 1847 in Wiveton ........................ 5 William Henry High b: 10 Sep 1854 in Wiveton Norfolk ............................ +Elizabeth Handley b: Abt. 1858 in Carlton Notts m: Abt. Dec 1876 in Leeds District ............................... 6 Ada Florry High b: Abt. 1878 in Wortley Leeds Yorkshire ................................... +Henry Knaggs b: Abt. 1879 m: Abt. Sep 1907 in Hunslet District ............................... 6 Gertrude Annie High b: Abt. Dec 1884 in Hunslet Leeds ............................... 6 William Martin High b: Abt. Mar 1887 in Hunslet Leeds ............................... 6 Nellie High b: Abt. Sep 1889 in Hunslet Leeds .................. *2nd Wife of Henry High: ..................... +Charlotte Edwards b: Abt. 1857 in Mattishall m: Abt. Sep 1880 in Mitford District ........................ 5 Beatrice High b: Abt. 1878 in Wood Norton .......................
    [Show full text]