DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatic Invertebrates of the Moose River Basin · an Initial Characterization of Aquatic Invertebrate Community :~Tructure in the Moose River Basin, Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatic Invertebrates of the Moose River Basin · an Initial Characterization of Aquatic Invertebrate Community :~Tructure in the Moose River Basin, Ontario AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES OF THE MOOSE RIVER BASIN · AN INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY :~TRUCTURE IN THE MOOSE RIVER BASIN, ONTARIO by CATRIEN WILLEMINA BOUWMAN, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofScience McMaster University ©Copyright by Catrien Willemina Bouwman, Aprill996. MASTER OF SCIENCE (1996) McMaster University (Biology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Aquatic Invertebrate Community Structure in the Moose ruver Basin. AUTHOR: Catrien W. Bouwman, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Jurek Kolasa NUMBER OF PAGE~:: xi, 96 ii Abstract The Moose River Basin in northern Ontario is an important large river system, however very little is known about its aquatic invertebrate community. As macroinvertebrates are an integral part ofriver ecosystems, I conducted an initial assessment ofthe aquatic invertebrate community structure in the Moose River Basin, at both a fine, and a basin-wide, scale. The fine scale study used invertebrate data collected at five reaches within~. 30km stretch ofthe Groundhog River. The examination ofthe invertebrate community at a basin-wide scale was accomplished using meta-analysis techniques on twenty-two studies conducted on various rivers within the Basin. The effect ofthe following factors on community structure were examined: i) the use of different sampling devices, ii) water depth, iii) substrate type, iv) sampling in two consecutive years, and v) spatial scale. I found that the use ofvarious sampling devices resulted in significantly different estimates ofcommunity structure. This strongly suggests that consistent sampling protocols are necessary to effectively compare results within, and among, studies. The etfect ofwater depth on community structure was inconclusive, as too few samples were ,:ollected to overcome the confounding effects of substrate type. Substrate type had a significant effect on community structure, with greater invertebrate richness and diversity iound in fine substrate in the Groundhog River study, but with no consistent patterns at the basin-wide scale. Invertebrate richness and diversity did not differ significantly in tbe Groundhog River between two consecutive years. In both the iii fine-scale and the basin-wide studies, the distribution ofaquatic invertebrates varied among sites within a river reach, and among reaches within a river. To further examine the biological and phy~•ical processes affecting community structure at the fine-scale, consistent sampling protocols should be employed, which may also allow basin-wide trends to emerge. iv Acknowledgments Thank-you Juwk, for such a friendly work environment, for your insights and ideas, and for the many cups oftea and coffee. The following t:mployees ofthe Ontario Ministry ofNatural Resources provided invaluable assistance in the field, and the occasional rescue when outboard motors became temperamental: Wayne Fiset, Charles Hendrie, Dean Phoenix, and John Sadowski. Many painstaki11g hours wer:e spent by Tracy Jolley and Danielle Dingle at the microscope, and by Wtmdy Sing Gen at the computer, never without good laughs, and always with unflagging friendship. My family is my mainstay; supporting me in hard times, sharing in my victories, I will never be able to thank you enough. Mark Conrad, my partner in the lab, now my partner in life, you never cease to motivate and inspire. The person to whom I am most indebted, for her prayers to the gods ofthe outboard motor, for ro:td-tripping and singing along with Indigo Girls, for swearing a blue streak with me, for being able to laugh, anytime, anyplace, in any situation, and for always, always being there, is Erin Fitzgerald. Erin, words can't express what we've been through together these last two years, and how much your friendship means to me. Thank­ you. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ........................................................................................................................ i .. N .. Descrtpttve ote.............................................................................................................. n Abstract. .......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgtnents........................................................................................................... v Table ofContents............................................................................................................. vi List ofTables................................................................................................................... ix List ofFigures.................................................................................................................. x 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... I 1.1 General Introduction ............................................................................................. I 1.2 Clarification of Contribution............................................................................... 6 2.0 A FINE-SCALE :~TUDY OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN THE GROUNDHOG RIVER ............................ 7 2.1 Abstract................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Methods and Materials........................................................................................ 13 2.3.1 Study Ar<::a.................................................................................................. 13 vi 2.3.2 Sampling..................................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Taxonomic Groups ..................................................................................... 18 2.3.4 Analysis....................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Results.................................................................................................................. 21 2.4.1 Year............................................................................................................. 21 2.4.2 Method........................................................................................................ 21 2.4.3 Substratt:......................................................................................................27 2.4.4 Area anc. Site............................................................................................... 32 2.4.5 Depth.......................................................................................................... 35 2.5 Discussion............................................................................................................ 36 2.6 References...........................................................................................................41 3.0 A META-ANALYSIS OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE DIVERSITY IN THE MOOSE RIVER BASIN................................................................................. 46 3. 1 Abstract. ............................................................................................................... 4 7 3.2 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 48 3.3 Method................................................................................................................. 51 3.3.1 Omnibus Tests ............................................................................................ 56 3.3.2 Meta-Analyses............................................................................................ 58 3.4 Results.................................................................................................................. 61 3.4.1 Omnibus Tests ............................................................................................ 61 3.4.2 Meta-Analyses............................................................................................ 63 vii 3.5 Discussion........................................................................................................... 67 3.6 References ............................................................................................................71 4.0 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................... 78 5.0 GENERAL REFERENCES.................................................................................... 79 6.0 APPENDIX................................................................................................................ 82 Vlll substrate type:....................................................................................................... 28 Figure 10: The mean abundance for each ofthe ten most abundant genera, for each substrate type.........................................................................................29 Figure 11: Total invertebrate richness vs. sample number, for each substrate type, and for all samples combined...................................................... 30 Figure 12: Total invertebrate richness vs. sample number for each substrate type, with 95% confidence limits for each.......................................................... 31 Figure 13: Total invertebrate richness vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Ecology of Certain Bottcm-Living
    DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF CERTAIN BOTTCM-LIVING INVERTEBRATES OF THE ii'/ESTERN BaSIN OF IAKE ERIE DISSERTATION Presented in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U n iv e r s ity by Kenneth George Wood, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 1953 «4 * ** Approved by* » i * ♦ , t • • < ■ i « A d v is e r i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOiYlE DC M EN TS....................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ............... 2 S a m p l i n g............................................................................................................ 2 Analysis of sediments ............................................................................... 9 Organic matter content ................................................................ 9 Particle size com position...................................................... 10 Moisture content ....... ............................................. 11 S tatistical representation ...................................................... 11 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE L a KE ....................................................... lU MorphoroetQr .................................. 1U G e o l o g y.................................................................................................................. 15 D r a i n a g e ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of a Hydropeaking Dam on River Health and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Secondary Production in a Northern Great Plains Rive
    EFFECTS OF A HYDROPEAKING DAM ON RIVER HEALTH AND BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SECONDARY PRODUCTION IN A NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RIVER A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Environment and Sustainability in the School of Environment and Sustainability University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Jordan Edward Mihalicz © Copyright Jordan Edward Mihalicz, January 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use that may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or make other uses of materials in this thesis, in whole or in part, should be addressed to: Head, School of Environment and Sustainability University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i ABSTRACT Hydroelectric dams represent an ever-growing portion of the global energy grid, and the number of operations practicing hydropeaking is on the rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw Bay Lake Huron
    Final Report to Michigan Great Lakes Protection Fund Office of Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Development of Indices of Biotic Integrity for Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Thomas M. Burton1,2 and Donald G. Uzarski3 Departments of Zoology1 and Fisheries and Wildlife2 Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824 and Annis Water Resources Institute3 Grand Valley State University Lake Michigan Center 740 West Shoreline Drive Muskegon, MI 49441 This research was made possible with funding from the Office of Great Lakes through the Great Lakes Protection Fund July 2003 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 Methods ................................................................................................................. 2 Site Selection ................................................................................................ 2 Sampling Procedures .................................................................................... 2 Results ................................................................................................................... 5 Invertebrates - Drowned River Mouth Wetlands ......................................... 6 Invertebrates - Fringing Wetlands ................................................................ 7 Fish Results .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 6, Issue 1, Fall 2015
    Journal of the Forest History Society of Ontario Forestory Volume 6, Issue 1, Fall 2015 Contents Forestry Research in Sault Ste. Marie - 3 Boom-and-Bust in Northwestern Ontario - 8 Loggers in Ontario, Alternative Pest Control - 13 Kettle Creek – 16 Central Experimental Farm - 1899 20 Art in the Park - 23 People Dr. Walter Plonski - 28 Martin Sugden - 31 Dr. Stephen Bocking - 32 Personal Recollections Garry Paget - 34 John Macfie – 37 Species American Black Bear - 42 Museum Corner NORMHC - 46 Sylva Recap – 48 Book Review – 52 Renewing Nature’s Wealth - 53 Events and News - 55 About the Authors - 57 Membership - 58 We want to hear from you! If you have articles, photographs or images, interesting facts, web links, Rob Galloway personal reflections or events that would be suitable for this newsletter, please contact the editor. Board of Directors Chair Mark Kuhlberg, PhD Past Chair Ken Armson, RPF (Ret.) Member, Ontario Historical Society Members Rob Galloway, Vice Chair http://www.ontariohistoricalsociety.ca/en/ Sarah Bros RPF Rob Galloway RPF Tom Griffiths RPF Front Cover Photo Credits: Mike Commito, PhD Mike Rosen RPF See John Bacher’s article on Kettle Creek (page #16). Secretary-Treasurer Patricia Hammond, Forests Ontario Journal Editor Scott Miller Contact Information Address Forest History Society of Ontario 144 Front Street West, Suite 700 Toronto, ON M5J 2L7 Tel: (416) 493-4565 Toll Free: 1-800-387-0790 Fax: (416) 493-4608 Web Site: http://www.ontarioforesthistory.ca Face Book Site: http://www.facebook.com/forest.history.society.of.ontario
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Micronectidae (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) from Vietnam, with Descriptions of 11 New Species
    European Journal of Taxonomy 756: 1–82 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.756.1407 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Ha T.N. & Tran A.D. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4A60FB62-20D7-4DC9-A4EA-BCE633730111 Taxonomy of Micronectidae (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) from Vietnam, with descriptions of 11 new species Tuyet Ngan HA 1 & Anh Duc TRAN 2,* 1,2 Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:568A022B-D36D-4147-8B0D-FB35B2A4D197 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3CB36F17-D917-4600-B888-C33B1C04259F Abstract. The taxonomy of Micronectidae in Vietnam is reviewed. Based on our cumulative collections during 2001–2020, 11 new species of Micronecta Kirkaldy, 1897 are documented and described in this study: M. acuminata sp. nov., M. arcuata sp. nov., M. caperata sp. nov., M. clavata sp. nov., M. cultellata sp. nov., M. fulvopicta sp. nov., M. nieseri sp. nov., M. pingae sp. nov., M. sinuata sp. nov., M. undulata sp. nov., and M. vietnamica sp. nov. Nine species are recorded from Vietnam for the fi rst time: M. decorata Lundblad, 1933, M. drepani Nieser, 2000, M. erythra Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. fugitans Breddin, 1905, M. johorensis Fernando, 1964, M. melanochroa Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. ornitheia Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. sahlbergi (Jakovlev, 1881), and M. tuwanoni Nieser, Chen, Leksawasdi, Thanyakam & Duangsupa, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • M.Sc Final Thesis
    INDICATOR INVERTEBRATES: DETERMINING CHANGE IN BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES DUE TO DEPOSITED SEDIMENT IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Brittney Marie Hoemsen Copyright Brittney Marie Hoemsen, April, 2015. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (S7N 5E2) i ABSTRACT Excessive sedimentation is a major stressor to ecosystem health in freshwater systems globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Tourism Project Underway Part of Master Plan for Game Preserve by Jim Prince Eco-Friendly Vacation Made As the CRDC Preserve
    Talk about PIZZA HUT & KFC There’s a Reason good coffee! We’re Number 1 864-0911 Miss Muggins Coffee and Fresh Donuts Vol. 9, Issue 7, October 17, 2004 Eco-tourism project underway Part of master plan for Game Preserve By Jim Prince eco-friendly vacation made as the CRDC preserve. When the Chapleau packages and as the unveiled its plans for “We were lucky to Regional Development c h a i r m a n o f t h e developing the Game to have the Town of Corporation officially d e v e l o p m e n t Preserve for tourists and Chapleau, Industry opened the Chapleau c o r p o r a t i o n a n d the design of a structure Canada FedNor and the Crown Game Preserve township Councillor to be erected in town N o r t h e r n O n t a r i o last week, it was Richard Bignucolo noted which will serve as the H e r i t a g e F u n d capitalizing on the at last week’s official physical entrance to the C o r p o r a t i o n c o m e leading tourism trend in opening ceremonies, Preserve. forward with the funds the world today. Chapleau is already a The unveiling and necessary to develop our According to many tourist destination with official opening came project,” Bignucolo told recognized authorities more than 25 tourist after a lengthy lead up of the crowd gathered for Above, Camille Robitaille, of Four Seasons and organizations o u t f i t t e r s o ff e r i n g p l a n n i n g b y l o c a l the official opening.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Ontario Fishing Regulations Summary
    ZONE 8 42 James Bay Recreational FishingRegulations 2014 Moosonee Key Plan River Moose River 3 Provincial Boundary FISHERIES MANAGEMENTZONE8 Kesagami River Lake Missinaibi River 11 Hearst Mattice 652 634 Railway Kapuskasing NOTE: Kabinakagami Cochrane - Those portions of the Missinaibi River Lake and Moose River that are between Zone 3 631 and Zone 8 are wholly within Zone 8 7 Railway 8 Lake 11 655 Iroquois Falls Abitibi Chapleau Crown Provincial Boundary Legend Timmins South Porcupine City/Town/Community Missinaibi Night MNR District Office Hawk 17 Major Road 101 L. Kirkland Lake Major Railway Game Preserve Wawa Zone Boundary 101 66 144 Major Lake Chapleau Park or Crown Game Preserve Elk Lake Lake Superior 129 Gogama Lake Sturgeon - Sultan 560 65 Closed All Year 9 667 Lake Sultan New Liskeard Timiskaming Industrial Rd 560 129 Lake Superior Lady-Evelyn Haileybury 0 20 40 60 80 100 Smoothwater 10 11 12 km ZONE 8 SEASONS AND LIMITS SPECIES OPEN SEASONS LIMITS SPECIES OPEN SEASONS LIMITS Walleye & Jan. 1 to Apr. 14 S - 4; not more than 1 greater than Sunfish Open all year S - 50 Sauger or any & 3rd Sat. in 46 cm (18.1 in.) C - 25 combination May to Dec. 31 C - 2; not more than 1 greater than 46 cm (18.1 in.) Brook Trout* Jan. 1 to Sept. 15 S - 5 C - 2 Largemouth Open all year S - 6 & Smallmouth C - 2 Rainbow Open all year S - 5 Bass or any Trout* C - 2 combination Lake Trout* Feb. 15 to Mar. 15 S - 3 Northern Pike Open all year S - 6; not more than 2 greater than & 3rd Sat.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide D'accueil Chapleau
    4th Edition Welcome Guide Guide d’accueil www.Chapleau.ca Table of Contents Chapleau Public Library Table des matières WELCOME Welcome! / Un mot de bienvenue 3 Welcome Visitors! Map (Chapleau Downtown) / Carte (Centre-ville de Chapleau) 5 Do-It-Yourself Adventures / Activités autoguidées 7 Go For a Drive / Prenez la route 9 Annual Events / Évènements Annuels 11 Accommodations / Hébergement 14 20 Pine Street West Recreation in Chapleau / Sports et loisirs à Chapleau 17 Restaurants / Restaurants 19 Tel: (705) 864-0852 Community Services / Services communautaires 20 Local Clubs / Clubs locaux 21 Monday to Thursday: Waterfront Park / Les rives de la rivière Chapleau 23 Winter Fun / Plaisir d’hiver 27 12pm-7pm Summer Fun / Plaisir d’été 28 Friday: 1pm-5pm Chapleau Crown Game Preserve / Réserve faunique de la Couronne de Chapleau 29 Provincial Parks / Les parcs provinciaux 31 August & September Map (Algoma) / Carte (Algoma) 34 Saturday: 10am-2pm Published by the Publié par le www.olsn.ca/chapleau Corporation of the Township of Chapleau Canton de Chapleau 20 Pine Street West Chapleau, Ontario, Canada P0M 1K0 20, rue Pine Ouest Chapleau, Ontario, Canada P0M 1K0 705-864-1330 705-864-1330 Photo Credits: Luhtasaari Industries, Moose Horn Lodge, Camille Cooper and Algoma Country. HUDSON MANITOBA Fort Severn BAY Welcome! Getting to Chapleau | Arriver à Chapleau JAMES Un mot de bienvenue BAY Pickle Lake Red Lake Moosonee 599 ONTARIO Ear Falls LAC 105 SEUL Armstrong Nakina Vermilion Bay Dryden Longlac Welcome to the Friendliest Town in the North. Kenora
    [Show full text]